DOCSLIB.ORG

1979-02-13 BCC Meeting Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1979-02-13 BCC Meeting Minutes i ;i February 13, 1979 Page 417 In ti Ir Meeting The Board of County Commissioners met in Commission Chambers in the Courthouse 11 11 Opened 1: on Tuesday, February 13, 1979. Commissioners Allen E. Arthur, Jr.; Lamar Thomas; I ! Dick Fischer; Lee Chira and Ed Mason were present. Also present were County 1 i Administrator James Harris, Assistant County Attorney Tom Wilkes and Deputy 1 j /I Clerk Mary Jo Hudson. There being a quorum, the Chai rman cal led the meeting to I/ order at 9:00 a.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Board /I f 1 paused for a moment of silent invocation. i! it 1. Upon a motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1; I; 1 the Board approved the minutes of the meeting of January 23, 24, 25 and 1:- I i1 February 1, 1979, and waived the reading of same. I I I Warrants and Upon a motion duly made, seconded and carried, the following warrants were Vouchers approved by the Board having been certified by the Finance Director that same had not been drawn on overexpended accounts: List # Amoun t Handicapped Chi 1 d Program Head Start Program Victim Advocate Program Spouse Abuse Youth P rograms Rehabi 1 i tat ion Center Green House I I Green House Citizens Dispute Settlement Diversion Project CSA Energy Program Neighborhood Services C. D., Housing Repair CETA I CETA I I CETA I I I YETP CETA VI Child Support Enforcement Program Commun i ty Development , 4th year Commun i ty Deve 1 opmen t , 3 rd year CETA VI Pub1 ic Works Sewer Grant Solid Waste Regular Board Civic Center Fund 53 Self Insurance Fund 58 7th Gas Tax Fund 82 Attorney Upon a mot ion by Commissioner Chi ra, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1 Payment 1, the Board accepted the recommendations of staff and approved payment of $219.73 ! to Mateer, Harbert, Bechtel & Phal in for attorney costs for the month of 1 January, 1979. I ! Charge Account No. 01-2-21011-334-0-5, 2-20010-334-0-0 February 13, 1979 Page 417 Consumer Mr. Barnhill told the Board that there was insufficient advertising about Protection - i; Barnhi 11 the Orange County Consumer Protection Agency and citizens didnot know itexisted. li 1: I ! Commissioner Arthur informed him that later in the month there was to be an I. i ad placed in the local newspaper telling the citizens about the different 1; II departments in the County. :j Ij /I North Orange Upon a motion by Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Chira and carried, I; Memor ia1 11 Hospital the Board accepted the recommendations of staff and accepted an audit of the Aud i t I North Orange Memorial Hospital Tax District for fi 1 ing. I, Ii ' /j Upon a motion by Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Chira and carried, I/1; the Board accepted the recommendations of the Publ ic Works Director and approved 1' the fol1owing.andasked theclerkof the Real EstateDept. to record same : R i g ht of Way Ag reemen t The South 30 ft. of: Lots 25 & 26 Willis R. Munger's Lands, in Section G, Township 22 South, Range 29 East, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "E", Pages 3, 7, 22 & 23, Publ ic Records of Orange County, Florida. li Granted by: lrvin F.and Louise B. Whitten / 1 I! Clarion Drive, Road Improvement Agreement I;1 The South 300 ft. of: Lots 25 & 26, Willis Munger's Lands, in Section G. /I Township 22, Lots 25 & 26 East as per plat book thereof recorded in Plat Book "E", Pages 3, 7, 22, & 23 Publ ic Records of Orange County, Florida. / Granted by: lrvin F. and Louise B. Whitten i i McKinley Avenue, Road Improvement Agreement Commencing at the NW corner of the SE& of the SW& of Section 30, Twp. 22 S, Rge. 29 E, County of Orange State of Florida, thence south 660.00 feet to the P.O.B, thence continuing south 135.42 feet to the north side of Old Winter Garden Road (60' wide) thence along said north R/W line N 68 26'00" E, 60.95 feet to a point of curve, thence along a curve concave to the N. E. on the N'ly R/W of Old Winher Garden Road having a radius of 3009.60 feet hhru a delta angle of 03 50140", aodistance of 201.88 feet thence N 19 54'00" E, 47.20 feet, thence N 89 50'00'' W, 262.90 feet to the P.O.B. Granted by: Robert L. Caudi 11 Right of Way Agreement The West 17.5 feet of: Commencing at the NW corner of the SEt of the SWt of Sec. 30, Twp. 22 S, Rge. 29 E, County of Orange, State of Florida; thence South 660.00 feet to the P. 0. B., thence continuing South 135.42 feet to the North side of Old Winter Garden Road (60' wide), thence along said North R/W 1 ine, N 68'26' 00" E, 60.95 feet to a point of curve, thence along a curve concave to the N. E. on the N'ly R/W of Old Winher Garden Road having a radius of 3009.60 feet thrg a delta angle of 03 50' 40", a distance of 201.88 feet, thence N 19 54' 00" E, 47.20 feet, thence N 89 50'00" W, 262.90 feet to the P. 0. B. Granted by: Robert L. Caudi 11 1) February 13, 1979 Page 418 \ i /I 4 February 13, 1979 Page 41 9 Petition to Notice having been given that the Board would hold a public hearing at 9:30 a.m. Vacate to hear those for or against the vacating of property described as follows: Troynel le by ' Big Lake A part of Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision as per plat thereof Apop ka recorded in Plat Book 0, Page 152, which part is more particularly described as follows: i 1. All of blocks A & B of Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 0, Page 152, Public : I Records of Orange County, Florida (including all areas designated "P.R.M." contiguous to said blocks.) 2. All of that platted street identified as Orange Plazza lying North of an extension of the Southern Boundary of Lot 10, Block A. 3. All that part of the platted street identified as Lakeshore Drive, lying West of an extension of the Eastern Boundary of Lot 6, Block B. 4. All that part of the West 1/2 of the platted area identified as Killarney Plazza immediately contiguous to the Eastern Boundary of Block B, including all property lying between an extension of the Southern Boundary of Block B and an extension of the Southern Boundary of that area desi gnated "Park" located wi thin Lakeshore Drive. 5. All areas designated "Park" on said Plat and lying within the areas described above, and the hour having arrived, the Chairman called the hearing to order. Pub1 ic Works Di rector Tom Hast ings said Engineering had no object ions to vacating of the subdivision subject to conditions they had outlined on the plat. : No one appeared in opposition, and the Chairman closed the hearing. Upon a motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Chira and carried, the Board accepted the recommendations of staff and adopted the following:l' ! RESOLUTION VACATING A PART OF THE PLAT OF TROYNELLE BY BIG LAKE APOPKA SUBDIVISION AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT i BOOK 0, PAGE 152, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORl DA WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 32, Orange County Code, Robert W. Sherman and Katherine L. Sherman, his wife, have petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County, Florida, for the adoption of a resolution vacating a part of the following described recorded plat of lands situated in Orange County, Florida, to-wit: A part of Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 0, Page 152, which part is more particularly described ,, as follows: 1. All of Blocks A and B of Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision as 1 per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 0, Page 152, Public Records of Orange County, Florida (including all areas designated "P.R.M1' contiguous to said blocks). 2. All of that platted street identified as Orange Plazza lying North of an extension of the Southern Boundary of Lot 10, Block A. 3. All that part of the platted street identified as Lakeshore Drive, lying West of an extension of the Eastern boundary of Lot 6, Block B. February 13, 1979 Page 419 February 13, 1979 Page 420 4. All that part of the West 3 of the platted area identified as Killarney Plazza immediately contiguous to the Eastern boundary of Block B, including all property lying between an extension of the Southern boundary of Block B and an extension of the Southern boundary of that area designated "Park" located within Lakeshore Drive. 5. All areas designated "Park" on said Plat and lying within the areas described above. and ; WHEREAS, Petitioners own the fee simple title to all the land above described, and the vacation of those lands will not affect the ownership or right of convenient access of persons owning other parts of the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Petitioners have given notice of their intention to apply to this Commission for vacation of the above-described part of the plat by publication of such notice in two weekly issues of a newspaper of general circulation in Orange County, Florida, the county in which this land is located, and have attached to their Petition proof of such publication; and WHEREAS, Petitioners have paid all State and County taxes owing on said property and have attached certificates to their Petition showing that all State and County taxes on lands encompassed in their Petition have been paid; and WHEREAS, none of the streets or alleys in the part of the plat of the Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision sought to be vacated have been taken over by the County for maintenance and are not part of the County road system, and they serve no useful purpose to any of the public except the Petitioner; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that said Petition and supporting documents are in accordance with the requirements of Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 32, Orange County, Code; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County, Florida, that the part of the plats of the Troynelle by Big Lake Apopka Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 0, Page 152, of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, as above described, pursuant to the Petition of Robert W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Permit to Erect and Maintain Custom Street Signs On
    Permit To Erect & Maintain Custom Street & Traffic Signs On Gwinnett County Street Rights-Of-Way (Revised November 2004) The intent of this permit is to grant (hereinafter called the “maintaining authority”) the authority to erect and maintain traffic signs within the boundaries of that includes the streets named as follows: The maintaining authority is granted the permission to erect and maintain signs of the following types: Street Name Signs Stop Signs and Yield Signs Other Regulatory Signs Other Warning Signs The maintaining authority is granted this permit with the following stipulations: • No cost to Gwinnett County shall arise from the maintenance of these custom signs. • The maintaining authority agrees to indemnify Gwinnett County of any liability incurred by these signs. • In the case of residential subdivisions, the maintaining authority will be the developer and a legally constituted homeowners association mandated by the restrictive covenants. • The restrictive covenants shall contain an express provision referencing the association’s responsibility to erect and maintain signage within the subdivision in accordance with the permit. • The final plat will contain a notice signed by the developer which notifies all property owners of their responsibility for erecting and maintaining signage in the subdivision in accordance with this permit. • Installation of Street Name Signs. All street name sign blades shall be installed on top of traffic control signs (Stop, Yield, etc.) – NO EXCEPTIONS. WDJ: J & X: Custom Traffic Sign Application Form Page 1 of 8 6” Maximum clearance from top of traffic control sign to the bottom of first street name sign. 3” Maximum clearance between street name sign blades.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018-19 to FY 2022-23
    Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2018-2019 to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018‐19 to FY 2022‐23 City Council Jonathan Ingram, Mayor Alan Long, Mayor Pro Tem Rick Gibbs, Councilmember Randon Lane, Councilmember Kelly Seyarto, Councilmember Kim Summers, City Manager Ivan Holler, Assistant City Manager Stacey Stevenson, Administrative Services Director Jeff Murphy, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 8 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 9 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 23 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................. 35 Parameters for Budget Cost Estimates ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Font Design for Street Name Signs
    PennDOT LTAP technical INFORMATION SHEET Font DesigN for Street Name SIgns #174 The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has terminated its approval of the Clearview Highway font, summer/2016 which PennDOT had specified as the standard font for freeway guide signs and conventional highway street name signs. Standard Alphabets for Traffic Control Devices, more commonly referred to as Highway Gothic, is now the only approved font for the design of traffic signs. FHWA has not issued a mandate on the replacement of signs using the Clearview font, but all future sign installations are to use the Highway Gothic font. This means existing signs may remain in use for their normal service life but should be replaced with a sign using Highway Gothic, when appropriate, as part of routine maintenance. Highway Gothic is a modified version of the standard Gothic font and was originally developed in the late 1940s by the California Department of Transportation. The font has six configurations known as letter series (B, C, D, E, E (modified), and F). Each series increasingly widens the individual letter sizing and expands the spacing between the letters. D3-1 street name sign with Street name signs (D3-1) and most other guide signs must be Highway Gothic font. designed separately because of variability in the message or legend that limits the ability to standardize sizes. PennDOT Publication 236, Handbook of Approved Signs, provides the minimum requirements for street name signs (D3-1). Additionally, the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states that letters used on street name signs (D3-1) must be composed of a combination of lowercase letters with initial uppercase letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifting the Veil of the Borderscape
    qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqLifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiexperience and societal processes in Northern Ireland opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg31-7-2020 Marnix Mohrmann hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert i yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas df h kl b df h kl i ‘While we have shared past, we do not have a shared memory’ Ulster Museum Lifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived experience and societal processes in Northern Ireland to contribute to the critical potential of the borderscape concept A thesis by Marnix Mohrmann Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Human Geography with specialization in Europe: Borders, Identity and Governance Under supervision of Dr. Olivier Kramsch Second reader: Prof. Dr. Henk van Houtum Internships: Visiting Research Associate at Queen’s University Belfast Radboud University Nijmegen, July 2020 Table of Contents List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................... i Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 SIGNS
    Chapter 2 SIGNS Topic No. 750-000-005 March 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual Revised: November 2017 Signs Section 2.1 USE OF SLIPPERY WHEN WET SIGNS 2.1.1 CONDITIONS FOR USE The District Traffic Operations Engineer shall request the District Maintenance Engineer to erect SLIPPERY WHEN WET (W8-5) signs at locations where it has been determined there is a slippery pavement condition. A slippery pavement is defined when a standard friction test at 40 mph has determined the skid numbers are less than 25. When the posted highway speed is above 45 mph, SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs should be installed when the skid numbers are less than 30, and also one of the following conditions is met: • When the Safety Ratio (Actual Crash Rate divided by the Critical Crash Rate) is greater than or equal to one. • Any downgrade greater than 3 percent. • At intersections with traffic signals. 2.1.2 LOCATION AND PLACEMENT Additional signs may be needed at locations with the following conditions: (1) Horizontal Curves. SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs are to be placed prior to the CURVE sign with an advisory speed plate. The ball-bank indicator provides a reasonable speed through the curve; however, a lower speed may be desired if there are known extraordinary hazards such as hydroplaning. (2) Hydroplaning. Generally, hydroplaning only occurs at speeds above 47 mph; however, excessive runoff across travel lanes may produce hydroplaning at lower speeds. Multi-lane facilities, rutted lanes, built-up shoulders, and downgrades are candidate locations. If excessive water buildup cannot be corrected, then SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs may be appropriate even when skid numbers are greater than 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Non-Mutcd Traffic Signing
    SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1SOo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HOP-06-074 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'l'OV Administration December 2005 NOTICE The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1Wo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-091 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'!,1ay AdmlnistraNon December 2005 Author The author of this report is W. Scott Wainwright, P.E., PTOE. He is a Highway Engineer with the MUTCD Team in FHWA’s Office of Transportation Operations in Washington, DC. Acknowledgements The author wishes to express appreciation to the FHWA Division Office staff in each State and to the many individuals in the State and local transportation departments. Without the assistance of these professionals, who provided the many documents, plans, drawings, and other information about special non-MUTCD signs, this synthesis would not have been possible. Special thanks are also extended to Mr. Fred Ranck of FHWA’s Resource Center in Olympia Fields, Illinois, who provided valuable review comments and suggestions that improved this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Regional Activities and Different Applications Chapter 7
    “An odonym or street name is a proper name that names selected should refer to the history of the country Section 3 Regional activities and different designates a street.” or the city and its memories, to the flora and fauna in its environment. These street names should open up the applications In the same way one could define odonymy as the study world nearby or further away by referring to places or of street names, or, more general, as the study of urban Chapter 7 Street name standardisation countries with which relationships or bonds of friendship names, whether it is street names, names of buildings, exist, with whom cooperation has been established, or institutions, constructions like bridges, public parks, or Brahim Atoui with the world of science, of arts or of sports., etc. even monuments that have an important commemorative character. The attribution of names can be an act of homage or recognition for the great personalities that have marked 7.1 Introduction the history of the location, of the city or the country as Street name standardisation is just as necessary, for both 7.2 Short historical development of street naming: well as of persons with a global impact such as Nobel national and international communication, as place between popular spontaneity and political prize laureates who, by their work or by their acts, have name standardisation. interventions delivered an important contribution to the development and well-being of humanity. In place name standardisation, place names are In the past, it did not use to be the task of the processed by a recognised toponymical authority on the administrative or political authorities in a country to take That is why, in order to give concrete form to this basis of a number of rules and normative criteria that are charge of the street naming process, just as it did not approach, criteria for street name selection will be essentially aimed at guaranteeing the univocity of these take charge of toponymy either.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2D. Guide Signs—Conventional Roads
    201109 Edition Page 151 CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS—CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard: 01 The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any road or street other than low-volume roads (as defined in Section 5A.01), expressways, and freeways. Section 2D.02 Application Support: 01 Guide signs are essential to direct road users along streets and highways, to inform them of intersecting routes, to direct them to cities, towns, villages, or other important destinations, to identify nearby rivers and streams, parks, forests, and historical sites, and generally to give such information as will help them along their way in the most simple, direct manner possible. 02 Chapter 2A addresses placement, location, and other general criteria for signs. Section 2D.03 Color, Retroreflection, and Illumination Support: 01 Requirements for illumination, retroreflection, and color are stated under the specific headings for individual guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard: 02 Except where otherwise provided in this Manual for individual signs or groups of signs, guide signs on streets and highways shall have a white message and border on a green background. All messages, borders, and legends shall be retroreflective and all backgrounds shall be retroreflective or illuminated. Support: 03 Color coding is sometimes used to help road users distinguish between multiple potentially confusing destinations. Examples of valuable uses of color coding include guide signs for roadways approaching or inside an airport property with multiple terminals serving multiple airlines, and community wayfinding guide signs for various traffic generator destinations within a community or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21
    City of Murrieta, California www.MurrietaCA.gov Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21 Cover photo: I‐15/Los Alamos Overcrossing project | Taken by: Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016‐17 to FY 2020‐21 City Council Randon Lane, Mayor Rick Gibbs, Mayor Pro Tem Jonathan Ingram, Councilmember Alan Long, Councilmember Harry Ramos, Councilmember Rick Dudley, City Manager Kim Summers, Assistant City Manager Joy Canfield, Administrative Services Director Ivan Holler, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 6 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 7 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 17 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE of CONTENTS
    STREET NAME SIGNS SPECIFICATIONS FOR FABRICATING AND INSTALLING Public Works Department Capital Projects Division Traffic Engineering Section City of Kansas City, Missouri March 2013 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………....1 SIZE AND SHEETING REQUIREMENTS FOR STREET NAME SIGNS …………..2 INSTALLATION OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES……………………...3 - 4 LOCATION OF STREET NAME SIGNS………………………….…………………...5 TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LOCATIONS………………………………………6 NUMBER OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED………..………….7 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLES AND DRAWINGS TABLE I - LIST OF STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS FOR STREET NAME PREFIXES AND SUFFIXES FIGURE I - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN STANDARD & ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION FIGURE II - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 4 inches) FIGURE III - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 6 inches) FIGURE IV- TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (Private Streets) FIGURE V - DIMENSIONS OF STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division INTRODUCTION Kansas City, Missouri Subdivisions Regulations adopted (City Ordinance Number 41498) March 30, 1973 require land developers to provide street name signs in accordance with city specifications at each intersection within new subdivisions. This includes intersections created along the perimeter of developments when new streets are opened and connected to existing streets. All street name sign installations are subject to the approval of the Capital Projects Division and will be considered as part of the overall construction requirements for subdivisions. The approved street name signs must be installed in their proper locations by the developer before final acceptance of street and sidewalk construction by the City Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Minneapolis
    CityofMinneapolis DepartmentofPublicWorks TrafficandParkingServicesDivision PreparedFor: CityofMinneapolis 300BorderAvenueN DesignGuidelines Minneapolis,MN55405 ForBicycleBoulevards PreparedBy: AlliantEngineering,Inc. 233ParkAvenueS,Suite300 Minneapolis,MN55415 FundedBy: April1,2011 April 1, 2011 Minneapolis Public Works Traffic and Parking Services Division Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines The Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) has been prepared for the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department with federal funding provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Non-Motorized Transportation Pilot (NTP) Program. The NTP projects are administered by a non-profit Transit for Livable Communities and implemented through Bike Walk Twin Cities. 1. Bicycle Boulevard Purpose Bicycle boulevards are low-volume and low-speed streets that have been optimized for bicycle travel through treatments such as traffic calming and traffic reduction, roadway signing and pavement markings, and intersection crossing treatments. The purpose of a bicycle boulevard is to improve bicycle safety and circulation, by providing cyclists a designated travel route as an alternative to or as a companion route to using lanes on higher motor vehicle volume streets. Bicycle boulevards take the shared roadway concept to a new level, creating an attractive, comfortable and convenient cycling environment that caters to all cyclist abilities. Although each bicycle boulevard may vary greatly in specific design features, they will all have the same purpose to maintain a low motor vehicle volume and a low motor vehicle speed street with consistent route signing and markings. 2. Goals and Objectives The goal of the Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) is to establish minimum design standards for bicycle boulevards within the City. The minimum design standards (or basic signing and pavement marking elements) will work to maintain consistency and to create an identity for these types of corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Review ROAD SAFETY
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Review First edition - November 2008 ROAD SAFETY ybybyxbyxbyxbyxbyxbyxbxb United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Review First edition - November 2008 ROAD SAFETY New York and Geneva, 2008 Note The designati ons employed and the presentati on of the material in this publicati on do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nati ons concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authoriti es, or concerning the delimitati on of its fronti ers or boundaries. Acknowledgements The UNECE Transport Division wishes to express its sincere thanks to all those who contributed to this issue of the Transport Review, either with arti cles or through administrati ve services. Copyright noti ce Arti cles are copyright of the author(s) att ributed to it. All other text is copyright of the United Nati ons. All photos and illustrati ons, unless otherwise menti oned, are copyright of UNECE. All rights reserved. Publishing and contact details Published by the United Nati ons Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Transport Division Palais des Nati ons, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland, Tel: +41 (0) 22 917 2401, Fax: +41 (0) 22 917 0039 Email: [email protected], Website: www.unece.org/trans Subscripti ons To subscribe or unsubscribe to the UNECE Transport Review, please send an email to [email protected] Message from Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon This year, more than one million people across the world will die from road traffi c injuries.
    [Show full text]