DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice to Contractor Packet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice to Contractor Packet September 07, 2018 TO ALL CONCERNED: The Department of Transportation has scheduled a bid letting to be held in this office October 04, 2018 at 1:30 PM The Notice to Contractors includes: 1. Website Information 2. Notice to all Bidders 3. Notices to Contractors Projects containing DBE Goals are indicated in the "Notice to Contractors". Please check the important letting information on the website frequently. The last day to submit acceptable prequalification statements for this letting is by 5:00 P.M. on Monday September 24, 2018. WEBSITE INFORMATION The Nebraska Department of Transportation, Contract Lettings Section, will be utilizing the Internet as our means of communicating with the contracting industry. Documents that are posted on the web are: Letting Schedule Notices to Contractors Informational Proposals Letting Plans List of Prequalified Contractors Planholders List Informational Addendums EBS (Electronic Bidding System) Apparent Low Bidders Bid Tabulations Standard Item Listing Awarded Average Unit Prices (AUP) Report Hard copies of these documents will be available for inspection in the Contracts Office. There will be a charge for reproduction of any of these documents. The Website address is: dot.nebraska.gov If you have any questions as you are using our Website, please contact us at: Nebraska Department of Transportation Contract Lettings Section P.O. Box 94759 Lincoln, NE 68509-4759 Phone (402) 479-4525 FAX (402) 479-3803 Email: [email protected] NOTICE TO ALL BIDDERS To report bid rigging activities call: 1-800-424-9071 The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) operates the above toll-free “hotline” Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. eastern time. Anyone with knowledge of possible bid rigging, bidder collusion, or other fraudulent activities should use the “hotline” to report such activities. The “hotline” is part of the DOT’s continuing effort to identify and investigate highway construction contract fraud and abuse and is operated under the direction of the DOT Inspector General. All information will be treated confidentially and caller anonymity will be respected. CALL ORDER: 100 CONTRACT ID: 1198X FEDERAL PROJECT NO. STP-S34D(103) LOCATION: S34D, PICKRELL SPUR BRIDGE IN COUNTY: GAGE The Nebraska Department of Transportation will receive sealed bids in Room 104 of the Central Office Building at 1500 Hwy. 2 in Lincoln, until 1:30 PM on October 04, 2018. At that time the bids will be opened and read. BIDDING PROPOSAL FORMS WILL BE ISSUED AND A CONTRACT AWARDED TO A CONTRACTOR WHO IS QUALIFIED FOR: CULVERTS START DATE: 06/17/2019 WORKING DAYS: 80 PRICE RANGE: $0.00 to $5,000,000.00 Plans, specifications, and additional letting information may be found at the Nebraska Department of Transportation's Web Site at http://dot.nebraska.gov/business-center/business-opp/hwy-bridge-lp/. This project is funded under the Federal-Aid Highway Act, all appropriate Federal requirements will apply. Quantities shown herein are FOR INFORMATION ONLY and should not be used for bidding purposes. The Department reserves the right to change these quantities without notice. GROUP 1 GRADING 0001 0030.10 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0002 1009.00 GENERAL CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1.000 LUMP 0003 1010.00 EXCAVATION 2410.000 CY 0004 1010.10 EXCAVATION, BORROW 452.000 CY 0005 1011.00 WATER 14.000 MGAL 0006 1012.00 RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKERS 7.000 EACH 0007 1041.00 SALVAGING AND PLACING TOPSOIL 9088.000 SY 0008 1101.00 REMOVE PAVEMENT 360.000 SY 0009 1102.00 REMOVE ASPHALT SURFACE 216.000 SY 0010 7017.00 REMOVE GUARDRAIL 310.000 LF GROUP 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0011 0030.30 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0012 3075.36 8" DOWELED CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CLASS 47B-3500 507.000 SY 0013 3089.25 TEMPORARY SURFACING 8" 1100.000 SY 0014 8029.25 FOUNDATION COURSE 6" 507.000 SY 0015 8060.05 GRANULAR SUBDRAIN 6.000 EACH 0016 9111.00 WATER 3.000 MGAL 0017 9170.00 EARTH SHOULDER CONSTRUCTION 3.800 STA 0018 9173.20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 507.000 SY GROUP 4 CULVERTS 0019 0030.40 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0020 4050.01 EXCAVATION FOR PIPE, PIPE-ARCH CULVERTS, AND HEADWALLS 256.000 CY 0021 4100.06 CLASS 47B-3000 CONCRETE FOR HEADWALL 10.500 CY 0022 4150.00 REINFORCING STEEL FOR HEADWALL 1205.000 LB 0023 4360.24 24" METAL FLARED-END SECTION 2.000 EACH 0024 P300.42 42" CULVERT PIPE, TYPE 3,4 OR 5 84.000 LF 0025 P402.24 24" CULVERT PIPE, TYPE 3,4,5 OR 6 122.000 LF GROUP 4A CULVERT AT STATION 20+36.00 0026 0030.40 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0027 4051.01 EXCAVATION FOR BOX CULVERTS 2289.000 CY 0028 4101.06 CLASS 47B-3000 CONCRETE FOR BOX CULVERT 535.650 CY 0029 4151.00 REINFORCING STEEL FOR BOX CULVERT 57028.000 LB 0030 6040.00 REMOVE STRUCTURE AT STATION 20+36.00 1.000 EACH 0031 8010.03 CRUSHED ROCK FOR BASE COURSE 95.760 CY GROUP 5 SEEDING 0032 0030.50 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0033 L019.13 EROSION CONTROL, CLASS 1D 8240.000 SY 0034 L019.20 EROSION CONTROL, CLASS 2A 848.000 SY 0035 L022.11 FABRIC SILT FENCE-LOW POROSITY 564.000 LF 0036 L022.81 SILT CHECK, TYPE 1-HIGH 1170.000 LF 0037 L022.83 SILT CHECK, TYPE 2-HIGH 176.000 LF GROUP 10 GENERAL ITEMS 0038 0001.08 BARRICADE, TYPE II 2724.000 BDAY 0039 0001.10 BARRICADE, TYPE III 1086.000 BDAY 0040 0001.90 SIGN DAY 7713.000 EACH 0041 0002.28 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL 6000.000 LF 0042 0002.30 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL 5000.000 LF 0043 0002.44 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING, TYPE PAINT 6000.000 LF 0044 0002.47 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING SURFACE PREPARATION 6000.000 LF 0045 0003.10 FLAGGING 32.000 DAY 0046 0003.50 CONCRETE PROTECTION BARRIER 325.000 LF 0047 0003.56 RELOCATE CONCRETE PROTECTION BARRIER 287.500 LF 0048 0003.58 INERTIAL BARRIER SYSTEM 2.000 EACH 0049 0003.70 TEMPORARY RUMBLE STRIP 4.000 EACH 0050 0003.74 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1.000 EACH 0051 0020.00 TRAINING 100.000 HOUR 0052 0030.00 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0053 4022.05 TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN 200.000 LF 0054 9110.01 RENTAL OF LOADER, FULLY OPERATED 5.000 HOUR 0055 9110.03 RENTAL OF DUMP TRUCK, FULLY OPERATED 5.000 HOUR 0056 9110.07 RENTAL OF SKID LOADER, FULLY OPERATED 5.000 HOUR 0057 9110.27 RENTAL OF CRAWLER MOUNTED HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR, FULLY 5.000 HOUR OPERATED 0058 L006.50 TEMPORARY SEEDING 2.000 ACRE 0059 L022.75 TEMPORARY SILT CHECK 200.000 LF 0060 L022.90 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE 200.000 LF 0061 L022.92 TEMPORARY EARTH CHECK 200.000 LF 0062 L032.70 TEMPORARY MULCH 1.000 TON 0063 L860.24 STORM EVENT RESTORATION - INCENTIVE 4.000 EACH 0064 L860.50 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS - CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE 1.000 LUMP CALL ORDER: 110 CONTRACT ID: 1296Y FEDERAL PROJECT NO. NH-136-6(125) LOCATION: US-136, BEATRICE EAST IN COUNTY: GAGE The Nebraska Department of Transportation will receive sealed bids in Room 104 of the Central Office Building at 1500 Hwy. 2 in Lincoln, until 1:30 PM on October 04, 2018. At that time the bids will be opened and read. BIDDING PROPOSAL FORMS WILL BE ISSUED AND A CONTRACT AWARDED TO A CONTRACTOR WHO IS QUALIFIED FOR: BITUMINOUS LENGTH: 7.9 MILES START DATE: 06/10/2019 WORKING DAYS: 85 PRICE RANGE: $0.00 to $5,000,000.00 Plans, specifications, and additional letting information may be found at the Nebraska Department of Transportation's Web Site at http://dot.nebraska.gov/business-center/business-opp/hwy-bridge-lp/. This project is funded under the Federal-Aid Highway Act, all appropriate Federal requirements will apply. Quantities shown herein are FOR INFORMATION ONLY and should not be used for bidding purposes. The Department reserves the right to change these quantities without notice. GROUP 1 GRADING 0001 0030.10 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0002 1009.00 GENERAL CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1.000 LUMP 0003 1011.00 WATER 2.000 MGAL 0004 1021.10 REMOVE DELINEATOR UNITS 31.000 EACH 0005 1030.00 EARTHWORK MEASURED IN EMBANKMENT 218.000 CY 0006 1102.00 REMOVE ASPHALT SURFACE 1095.000 SY 0007 4040.00 REMOVE HEADWALLS FROM CULVERTS 2.000 EACH 0008 4050.01 EXCAVATION FOR PIPE, PIPE-ARCH CULVERTS, AND HEADWALLS 8.000 CY 0009 4107.07 CLASS 47B-3000 CONCRETE FOR CONCRETE COLLARS 1.060 CY 0010 4157.00 REINFORCING STEEL FOR COLLARS 86.000 LB 0011 4360.24 24" METAL FLARED-END SECTION 2.000 EACH 0012 7017.00 REMOVE GUARDRAIL 991.000 LF 0013 L006.00 COVER CROP SEEDING 17.000 ACRE 0014 L022.11 FABRIC SILT FENCE-LOW POROSITY 2358.000 LF 0015 P300.24 24" CULVERT PIPE, TYPE 3,4 OR 5 24.000 LF GROUP 5 SEEDING 0016 0030.50 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0017 L001.02 SEEDING, TYPE B 17.000 ACRE 0018 L019.13 EROSION CONTROL, CLASS 1D 1674.000 SY 0019 L019.20 EROSION CONTROL, CLASS 2A 94.000 SY 0020 L032.75 MULCH 38.000 TON GROUP 6 BRIDGE AT STATION 138+17.19 0021 0030.60 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0022 6004.98 ASPHALT PLUG JOINT SYSTEM 88.000 LF 0023 6007.12 CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK REPAIR 14.800 SY 0024 6010.26 CLASS 47BD-4000 CONCRETE FOR BRIDGE 3.900 CY 0025 6030.00 PREPARATION OF BRIDGE AT STATION 138+17.19 1.000 EACH 0026 6131.50 EPOXY COATED REINFORCING STEEL 980.000 LB 0027 6617.30 CONCRETE PATCHING 34.300 SF 0028 6960.11 BRIDGE APPROACH REPAIR 19.200 SY GROUP 6A BRIDGE AT STATION 369+73.24 0029 0030.60 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0030 3089.80 FLOWABLE FILL CONCRETE 1.600 CY 0031 6004.98 ASPHALT PLUG JOINT SYSTEM 88.000 LF 0032 6007.12 CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK REPAIR 40.600 SY 0033 6010.26 CLASS 47BD-4000 CONCRETE FOR BRIDGE 3.900 CY 0034 6030.00 PREPARATION OF BRIDGE AT STATION 369+73.24 1.000 EACH 0035 6131.50 EPOXY COATED REINFORCING STEEL 980.000 LB 0036 6617.30 CONCRETE PATCHING 64.000 SF 0037 6960.11 BRIDGE APPROACH REPAIR 33.900 SY GROUP 7 GUARDRAIL 0038 0030.70 MOBILIZATION 1.000 LUMP 0039 7011.20 W-BEAM GUARDRAIL 300.000 LF 0040 7020.00 BRIDGE APPROACH SECTIONS 8.000 EACH
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Permit to Erect and Maintain Custom Street Signs On
    Permit To Erect & Maintain Custom Street & Traffic Signs On Gwinnett County Street Rights-Of-Way (Revised November 2004) The intent of this permit is to grant (hereinafter called the “maintaining authority”) the authority to erect and maintain traffic signs within the boundaries of that includes the streets named as follows: The maintaining authority is granted the permission to erect and maintain signs of the following types: Street Name Signs Stop Signs and Yield Signs Other Regulatory Signs Other Warning Signs The maintaining authority is granted this permit with the following stipulations: • No cost to Gwinnett County shall arise from the maintenance of these custom signs. • The maintaining authority agrees to indemnify Gwinnett County of any liability incurred by these signs. • In the case of residential subdivisions, the maintaining authority will be the developer and a legally constituted homeowners association mandated by the restrictive covenants. • The restrictive covenants shall contain an express provision referencing the association’s responsibility to erect and maintain signage within the subdivision in accordance with the permit. • The final plat will contain a notice signed by the developer which notifies all property owners of their responsibility for erecting and maintaining signage in the subdivision in accordance with this permit. • Installation of Street Name Signs. All street name sign blades shall be installed on top of traffic control signs (Stop, Yield, etc.) – NO EXCEPTIONS. WDJ: J & X: Custom Traffic Sign Application Form Page 1 of 8 6” Maximum clearance from top of traffic control sign to the bottom of first street name sign. 3” Maximum clearance between street name sign blades.
    [Show full text]
  • 1979-02-13 BCC Meeting Minutes
    i ;i February 13, 1979 Page 417 In ti Ir Meeting The Board of County Commissioners met in Commission Chambers in the Courthouse 11 11 Opened 1: on Tuesday, February 13, 1979. Commissioners Allen E. Arthur, Jr.; Lamar Thomas; I ! Dick Fischer; Lee Chira and Ed Mason were present. Also present were County 1 i Administrator James Harris, Assistant County Attorney Tom Wilkes and Deputy 1 j /I Clerk Mary Jo Hudson. There being a quorum, the Chai rman cal led the meeting to I/ order at 9:00 a.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Board /I f 1 paused for a moment of silent invocation. i! it 1. Upon a motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1; I; 1 the Board approved the minutes of the meeting of January 23, 24, 25 and 1:- I i1 February 1, 1979, and waived the reading of same. I I I Warrants and Upon a motion duly made, seconded and carried, the following warrants were Vouchers approved by the Board having been certified by the Finance Director that same had not been drawn on overexpended accounts: List # Amoun t Handicapped Chi 1 d Program Head Start Program Victim Advocate Program Spouse Abuse Youth P rograms Rehabi 1 i tat ion Center Green House I I Green House Citizens Dispute Settlement Diversion Project CSA Energy Program Neighborhood Services C. D., Housing Repair CETA I CETA I I CETA I I I YETP CETA VI Child Support Enforcement Program Commun i ty Development , 4th year Commun i ty Deve 1 opmen t , 3 rd year CETA VI Pub1 ic Works Sewer Grant Solid Waste Regular Board Civic Center Fund 53 Self Insurance Fund 58 7th Gas Tax Fund 82 Attorney Upon a mot ion by Commissioner Chi ra, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1 Payment 1, the Board accepted the recommendations of staff and approved payment of $219.73 ! to Mateer, Harbert, Bechtel & Phal in for attorney costs for the month of 1 January, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018-19 to FY 2022-23
    Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2018-2019 to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018‐19 to FY 2022‐23 City Council Jonathan Ingram, Mayor Alan Long, Mayor Pro Tem Rick Gibbs, Councilmember Randon Lane, Councilmember Kelly Seyarto, Councilmember Kim Summers, City Manager Ivan Holler, Assistant City Manager Stacey Stevenson, Administrative Services Director Jeff Murphy, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 8 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 9 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 23 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................. 35 Parameters for Budget Cost Estimates ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Font Design for Street Name Signs
    PennDOT LTAP technical INFORMATION SHEET Font DesigN for Street Name SIgns #174 The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has terminated its approval of the Clearview Highway font, summer/2016 which PennDOT had specified as the standard font for freeway guide signs and conventional highway street name signs. Standard Alphabets for Traffic Control Devices, more commonly referred to as Highway Gothic, is now the only approved font for the design of traffic signs. FHWA has not issued a mandate on the replacement of signs using the Clearview font, but all future sign installations are to use the Highway Gothic font. This means existing signs may remain in use for their normal service life but should be replaced with a sign using Highway Gothic, when appropriate, as part of routine maintenance. Highway Gothic is a modified version of the standard Gothic font and was originally developed in the late 1940s by the California Department of Transportation. The font has six configurations known as letter series (B, C, D, E, E (modified), and F). Each series increasingly widens the individual letter sizing and expands the spacing between the letters. D3-1 street name sign with Street name signs (D3-1) and most other guide signs must be Highway Gothic font. designed separately because of variability in the message or legend that limits the ability to standardize sizes. PennDOT Publication 236, Handbook of Approved Signs, provides the minimum requirements for street name signs (D3-1). Additionally, the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states that letters used on street name signs (D3-1) must be composed of a combination of lowercase letters with initial uppercase letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifting the Veil of the Borderscape
    qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqLifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiexperience and societal processes in Northern Ireland opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg31-7-2020 Marnix Mohrmann hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert i yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas df h kl b df h kl i ‘While we have shared past, we do not have a shared memory’ Ulster Museum Lifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived experience and societal processes in Northern Ireland to contribute to the critical potential of the borderscape concept A thesis by Marnix Mohrmann Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Human Geography with specialization in Europe: Borders, Identity and Governance Under supervision of Dr. Olivier Kramsch Second reader: Prof. Dr. Henk van Houtum Internships: Visiting Research Associate at Queen’s University Belfast Radboud University Nijmegen, July 2020 Table of Contents List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................... i Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 SIGNS
    Chapter 2 SIGNS Topic No. 750-000-005 March 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual Revised: November 2017 Signs Section 2.1 USE OF SLIPPERY WHEN WET SIGNS 2.1.1 CONDITIONS FOR USE The District Traffic Operations Engineer shall request the District Maintenance Engineer to erect SLIPPERY WHEN WET (W8-5) signs at locations where it has been determined there is a slippery pavement condition. A slippery pavement is defined when a standard friction test at 40 mph has determined the skid numbers are less than 25. When the posted highway speed is above 45 mph, SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs should be installed when the skid numbers are less than 30, and also one of the following conditions is met: • When the Safety Ratio (Actual Crash Rate divided by the Critical Crash Rate) is greater than or equal to one. • Any downgrade greater than 3 percent. • At intersections with traffic signals. 2.1.2 LOCATION AND PLACEMENT Additional signs may be needed at locations with the following conditions: (1) Horizontal Curves. SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs are to be placed prior to the CURVE sign with an advisory speed plate. The ball-bank indicator provides a reasonable speed through the curve; however, a lower speed may be desired if there are known extraordinary hazards such as hydroplaning. (2) Hydroplaning. Generally, hydroplaning only occurs at speeds above 47 mph; however, excessive runoff across travel lanes may produce hydroplaning at lower speeds. Multi-lane facilities, rutted lanes, built-up shoulders, and downgrades are candidate locations. If excessive water buildup cannot be corrected, then SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs may be appropriate even when skid numbers are greater than 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Non-Mutcd Traffic Signing
    SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1SOo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HOP-06-074 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'l'OV Administration December 2005 NOTICE The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1Wo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-091 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'!,1ay AdmlnistraNon December 2005 Author The author of this report is W. Scott Wainwright, P.E., PTOE. He is a Highway Engineer with the MUTCD Team in FHWA’s Office of Transportation Operations in Washington, DC. Acknowledgements The author wishes to express appreciation to the FHWA Division Office staff in each State and to the many individuals in the State and local transportation departments. Without the assistance of these professionals, who provided the many documents, plans, drawings, and other information about special non-MUTCD signs, this synthesis would not have been possible. Special thanks are also extended to Mr. Fred Ranck of FHWA’s Resource Center in Olympia Fields, Illinois, who provided valuable review comments and suggestions that improved this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Regional Activities and Different Applications Chapter 7
    “An odonym or street name is a proper name that names selected should refer to the history of the country Section 3 Regional activities and different designates a street.” or the city and its memories, to the flora and fauna in its environment. These street names should open up the applications In the same way one could define odonymy as the study world nearby or further away by referring to places or of street names, or, more general, as the study of urban Chapter 7 Street name standardisation countries with which relationships or bonds of friendship names, whether it is street names, names of buildings, exist, with whom cooperation has been established, or institutions, constructions like bridges, public parks, or Brahim Atoui with the world of science, of arts or of sports., etc. even monuments that have an important commemorative character. The attribution of names can be an act of homage or recognition for the great personalities that have marked 7.1 Introduction the history of the location, of the city or the country as Street name standardisation is just as necessary, for both 7.2 Short historical development of street naming: well as of persons with a global impact such as Nobel national and international communication, as place between popular spontaneity and political prize laureates who, by their work or by their acts, have name standardisation. interventions delivered an important contribution to the development and well-being of humanity. In place name standardisation, place names are In the past, it did not use to be the task of the processed by a recognised toponymical authority on the administrative or political authorities in a country to take That is why, in order to give concrete form to this basis of a number of rules and normative criteria that are charge of the street naming process, just as it did not approach, criteria for street name selection will be essentially aimed at guaranteeing the univocity of these take charge of toponymy either.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2D. Guide Signs—Conventional Roads
    201109 Edition Page 151 CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS—CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard: 01 The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any road or street other than low-volume roads (as defined in Section 5A.01), expressways, and freeways. Section 2D.02 Application Support: 01 Guide signs are essential to direct road users along streets and highways, to inform them of intersecting routes, to direct them to cities, towns, villages, or other important destinations, to identify nearby rivers and streams, parks, forests, and historical sites, and generally to give such information as will help them along their way in the most simple, direct manner possible. 02 Chapter 2A addresses placement, location, and other general criteria for signs. Section 2D.03 Color, Retroreflection, and Illumination Support: 01 Requirements for illumination, retroreflection, and color are stated under the specific headings for individual guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard: 02 Except where otherwise provided in this Manual for individual signs or groups of signs, guide signs on streets and highways shall have a white message and border on a green background. All messages, borders, and legends shall be retroreflective and all backgrounds shall be retroreflective or illuminated. Support: 03 Color coding is sometimes used to help road users distinguish between multiple potentially confusing destinations. Examples of valuable uses of color coding include guide signs for roadways approaching or inside an airport property with multiple terminals serving multiple airlines, and community wayfinding guide signs for various traffic generator destinations within a community or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21
    City of Murrieta, California www.MurrietaCA.gov Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21 Cover photo: I‐15/Los Alamos Overcrossing project | Taken by: Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016‐17 to FY 2020‐21 City Council Randon Lane, Mayor Rick Gibbs, Mayor Pro Tem Jonathan Ingram, Councilmember Alan Long, Councilmember Harry Ramos, Councilmember Rick Dudley, City Manager Kim Summers, Assistant City Manager Joy Canfield, Administrative Services Director Ivan Holler, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 6 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 7 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 17 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE of CONTENTS
    STREET NAME SIGNS SPECIFICATIONS FOR FABRICATING AND INSTALLING Public Works Department Capital Projects Division Traffic Engineering Section City of Kansas City, Missouri March 2013 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………....1 SIZE AND SHEETING REQUIREMENTS FOR STREET NAME SIGNS …………..2 INSTALLATION OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES……………………...3 - 4 LOCATION OF STREET NAME SIGNS………………………….…………………...5 TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LOCATIONS………………………………………6 NUMBER OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED………..………….7 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLES AND DRAWINGS TABLE I - LIST OF STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS FOR STREET NAME PREFIXES AND SUFFIXES FIGURE I - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN STANDARD & ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION FIGURE II - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 4 inches) FIGURE III - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 6 inches) FIGURE IV- TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (Private Streets) FIGURE V - DIMENSIONS OF STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division INTRODUCTION Kansas City, Missouri Subdivisions Regulations adopted (City Ordinance Number 41498) March 30, 1973 require land developers to provide street name signs in accordance with city specifications at each intersection within new subdivisions. This includes intersections created along the perimeter of developments when new streets are opened and connected to existing streets. All street name sign installations are subject to the approval of the Capital Projects Division and will be considered as part of the overall construction requirements for subdivisions. The approved street name signs must be installed in their proper locations by the developer before final acceptance of street and sidewalk construction by the City Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Minneapolis
    CityofMinneapolis DepartmentofPublicWorks TrafficandParkingServicesDivision PreparedFor: CityofMinneapolis 300BorderAvenueN DesignGuidelines Minneapolis,MN55405 ForBicycleBoulevards PreparedBy: AlliantEngineering,Inc. 233ParkAvenueS,Suite300 Minneapolis,MN55415 FundedBy: April1,2011 April 1, 2011 Minneapolis Public Works Traffic and Parking Services Division Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines The Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) has been prepared for the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department with federal funding provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Non-Motorized Transportation Pilot (NTP) Program. The NTP projects are administered by a non-profit Transit for Livable Communities and implemented through Bike Walk Twin Cities. 1. Bicycle Boulevard Purpose Bicycle boulevards are low-volume and low-speed streets that have been optimized for bicycle travel through treatments such as traffic calming and traffic reduction, roadway signing and pavement markings, and intersection crossing treatments. The purpose of a bicycle boulevard is to improve bicycle safety and circulation, by providing cyclists a designated travel route as an alternative to or as a companion route to using lanes on higher motor vehicle volume streets. Bicycle boulevards take the shared roadway concept to a new level, creating an attractive, comfortable and convenient cycling environment that caters to all cyclist abilities. Although each bicycle boulevard may vary greatly in specific design features, they will all have the same purpose to maintain a low motor vehicle volume and a low motor vehicle speed street with consistent route signing and markings. 2. Goals and Objectives The goal of the Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) is to establish minimum design standards for bicycle boulevards within the City. The minimum design standards (or basic signing and pavement marking elements) will work to maintain consistency and to create an identity for these types of corridors.
    [Show full text]