DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21 City of Murrieta, California www.MurrietaCA.gov Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21 Cover photo: I‐15/Los Alamos Overcrossing project | Taken by: Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Capital Improvement Plan FY 2016‐17 to FY 2020‐21 City Council Randon Lane, Mayor Rick Gibbs, Mayor Pro Tem Jonathan Ingram, Councilmember Alan Long, Councilmember Harry Ramos, Councilmember Rick Dudley, City Manager Kim Summers, Assistant City Manager Joy Canfield, Administrative Services Director Ivan Holler, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 6 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 7 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 17 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................. 25 Parameters for Budget Cost Estimates ....................................................................................................... 28 BRIDGES I‐15 Interchange at California Oaks Road ‐ 8147 ........................................................................................ 29 I‐215 Interchange at Clinton Keith Road ‐ 8303 .......................................................................................... 30 I‐15 Overcrossing at Los Alamos Road ‐ 8311 ............................................................................................. 31 Ivy Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek ‐ 8322 ............................................................................................. 32 Guava Bridge over Murrieta Creek ‐ 8323 .................................................................................................. 33 Jackson Avenue and Warm Springs Creek ‐ 8335 ....................................................................................... 34 I‐15 at Murrieta Hot Springs Modification ‐ 8411 ....................................................................................... 35 Keller Road at I‐215 Interchange ‐ 8449 ..................................................................................................... 36 STREETS & HIGHWAYS Madison Avenue/Jefferson Avenue Intersection ‐ 8026 ............................................................................ 37 Date Street Improvements: Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road ‐ 8040 ................................... 38 Pavement Resurfacing – Asphalt Overlay ‐ 8043 ........................................................................................ 39 Washington Avenue: Lemon to Magnolia ‐ 8047 ....................................................................................... 40 Guava Street: Jefferson to Murrieta Creek ‐ 8059 ..................................................................................... 41 MHSR Widening: Margarita to Date ‐ 8079 ................................................................................................ 42 Pavement Resurfacing – Slurry Seal ‐ 8137 ................................................................................................ 43 Traffic Striping Modifications – Citywide ‐ 8283 ......................................................................................... 44 Sidewalk Replacement – Citywide ‐ 8293 ................................................................................................... 45 Madison: Murrieta Hot Springs to Elm ‐ 8357 ............................................................................................ 46 Jefferson Widening at Ballesteros Road ‐ 8380 .......................................................................................... 47 Hancock Widening at Walsh Center Drive ‐ 8381 ....................................................................................... 48 Whitewood Widening: Hunter to Clinton Keith (east) ‐ 8389 ................................................................... 49 Regency Development Agreement ‐ 8425 .................................................................................................. 50 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program ‐ 8430 ................................................................................. 51 MHSR Medians: Alta Murrieta to Margarita Road ‐ 8433 .......................................................................... 52 Los Alamos I‐215 Landscaping ‐ 8435 ......................................................................................................... 53 Meadowlark Lane Improvements ‐ 8448 .................................................................................................... 54 Whitewood Road Extension ‐ 8456 ............................................................................................................ 55 Jackson Avenue Median ‐ 10012 ................................................................................................................ 56 Street Name Sign Replacement Program ‐ 10014 ...................................................................................... 57 Pavement Management System ‐ 10015 .................................................................................................... 58 Pedestrian Safety Enhancements – 2015/16 ‐ 13025 ................................................................................. 59 i Table of Contents Pedestrian Safety Enhancements – 2016/17 ‐ 13026 ................................................................................. 60 MHSR and Alta Murrieta Drive Intersection ‐ 13027 .................................................................................. 61 TRAFFIC SIGNALS Historic Downtown Traffic Signal Modifications ‐ 8095 ............................................................................. 63 Citywide Signal Modifications ‐ 8257 .......................................................................................................... 64 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management ‐ 8330 .................................................................... 65 Priority Traffic Signal ‐ 8438 ........................................................................................................................ 66 Traffic Center ‐ 17005 ................................................................................................................................. 67 STORM DRAINS Line D and D1 – Madison to Jefferson ‐ 8157 ............................................................................................. 69 Line E Storm Drain ‐ 8202 ........................................................................................................................... 70 Murrieta Creek Design ‐ 8345 ..................................................................................................................... 71 Clinton Keith Road Culvert Rehabilitation ‐ 19001 ..................................................................................... 72 Storm Drain Master Plan ‐ 19002 ............................................................................................................... 73 BUILDINGS Fire Station #4 Training Facility ‐ 8232 ........................................................................................................ 75 Town Square Signage ‐ 8414 ....................................................................................................................... 76 Senior Center Expansion ‐ 10013 ................................................................................................................ 77 Community Center ADA Restrooms ‐ 21010 .............................................................................................. 78 Police Station Front Door Replacement ‐ 21011 ........................................................................................ 79 Police Station Roof Repair ‐ 21012 ............................................................................................................. 80 PARKS Los Alamos Hills Sports Park – Phase II ‐ 8082 ............................................................................................ 81 Pond Park Improvements – Parking Lot ‐ 8093 .......................................................................................... 82 Second Avenue Park ‐ 8094 ........................................................................................................................ 83 Los Alamos Hills Sports Park – Phase I ‐ 8195 ............................................................................................. 84 Glen Arbor Park Improvements ‐ 8273 ....................................................................................................... 85 Town Square Park ‐ Phase I ‐ 8349 .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Permit to Erect and Maintain Custom Street Signs On
    Permit To Erect & Maintain Custom Street & Traffic Signs On Gwinnett County Street Rights-Of-Way (Revised November 2004) The intent of this permit is to grant (hereinafter called the “maintaining authority”) the authority to erect and maintain traffic signs within the boundaries of that includes the streets named as follows: The maintaining authority is granted the permission to erect and maintain signs of the following types: Street Name Signs Stop Signs and Yield Signs Other Regulatory Signs Other Warning Signs The maintaining authority is granted this permit with the following stipulations: • No cost to Gwinnett County shall arise from the maintenance of these custom signs. • The maintaining authority agrees to indemnify Gwinnett County of any liability incurred by these signs. • In the case of residential subdivisions, the maintaining authority will be the developer and a legally constituted homeowners association mandated by the restrictive covenants. • The restrictive covenants shall contain an express provision referencing the association’s responsibility to erect and maintain signage within the subdivision in accordance with the permit. • The final plat will contain a notice signed by the developer which notifies all property owners of their responsibility for erecting and maintaining signage in the subdivision in accordance with this permit. • Installation of Street Name Signs. All street name sign blades shall be installed on top of traffic control signs (Stop, Yield, etc.) – NO EXCEPTIONS. WDJ: J & X: Custom Traffic Sign Application Form Page 1 of 8 6” Maximum clearance from top of traffic control sign to the bottom of first street name sign. 3” Maximum clearance between street name sign blades.
    [Show full text]
  • 1979-02-13 BCC Meeting Minutes
    i ;i February 13, 1979 Page 417 In ti Ir Meeting The Board of County Commissioners met in Commission Chambers in the Courthouse 11 11 Opened 1: on Tuesday, February 13, 1979. Commissioners Allen E. Arthur, Jr.; Lamar Thomas; I ! Dick Fischer; Lee Chira and Ed Mason were present. Also present were County 1 i Administrator James Harris, Assistant County Attorney Tom Wilkes and Deputy 1 j /I Clerk Mary Jo Hudson. There being a quorum, the Chai rman cal led the meeting to I/ order at 9:00 a.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Board /I f 1 paused for a moment of silent invocation. i! it 1. Upon a motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1; I; 1 the Board approved the minutes of the meeting of January 23, 24, 25 and 1:- I i1 February 1, 1979, and waived the reading of same. I I I Warrants and Upon a motion duly made, seconded and carried, the following warrants were Vouchers approved by the Board having been certified by the Finance Director that same had not been drawn on overexpended accounts: List # Amoun t Handicapped Chi 1 d Program Head Start Program Victim Advocate Program Spouse Abuse Youth P rograms Rehabi 1 i tat ion Center Green House I I Green House Citizens Dispute Settlement Diversion Project CSA Energy Program Neighborhood Services C. D., Housing Repair CETA I CETA I I CETA I I I YETP CETA VI Child Support Enforcement Program Commun i ty Development , 4th year Commun i ty Deve 1 opmen t , 3 rd year CETA VI Pub1 ic Works Sewer Grant Solid Waste Regular Board Civic Center Fund 53 Self Insurance Fund 58 7th Gas Tax Fund 82 Attorney Upon a mot ion by Commissioner Chi ra, seconded by Commissioner Mason and carried, 1 Payment 1, the Board accepted the recommendations of staff and approved payment of $219.73 ! to Mateer, Harbert, Bechtel & Phal in for attorney costs for the month of 1 January, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018-19 to FY 2022-23
    Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2018-2019 to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Plan FY 2018‐19 to FY 2022‐23 City Council Jonathan Ingram, Mayor Alan Long, Mayor Pro Tem Rick Gibbs, Councilmember Randon Lane, Councilmember Kelly Seyarto, Councilmember Kim Summers, City Manager Ivan Holler, Assistant City Manager Stacey Stevenson, Administrative Services Director Jeff Murphy, Development Services Director This Page Left Blank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Guide to Reading the CIP Project Detail ....................................................................................................... 8 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Capital Improvement Plan Sources & Uses ................................................................................................... 9 Revenue Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Revenue Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source ...................................................................................... 23 Unfunded Projects by Category .................................................................................................................. 35 Parameters for Budget Cost Estimates ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Font Design for Street Name Signs
    PennDOT LTAP technical INFORMATION SHEET Font DesigN for Street Name SIgns #174 The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has terminated its approval of the Clearview Highway font, summer/2016 which PennDOT had specified as the standard font for freeway guide signs and conventional highway street name signs. Standard Alphabets for Traffic Control Devices, more commonly referred to as Highway Gothic, is now the only approved font for the design of traffic signs. FHWA has not issued a mandate on the replacement of signs using the Clearview font, but all future sign installations are to use the Highway Gothic font. This means existing signs may remain in use for their normal service life but should be replaced with a sign using Highway Gothic, when appropriate, as part of routine maintenance. Highway Gothic is a modified version of the standard Gothic font and was originally developed in the late 1940s by the California Department of Transportation. The font has six configurations known as letter series (B, C, D, E, E (modified), and F). Each series increasingly widens the individual letter sizing and expands the spacing between the letters. D3-1 street name sign with Street name signs (D3-1) and most other guide signs must be Highway Gothic font. designed separately because of variability in the message or legend that limits the ability to standardize sizes. PennDOT Publication 236, Handbook of Approved Signs, provides the minimum requirements for street name signs (D3-1). Additionally, the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states that letters used on street name signs (D3-1) must be composed of a combination of lowercase letters with initial uppercase letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifting the Veil of the Borderscape
    qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqLifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiexperience and societal processes in Northern Ireland opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg31-7-2020 Marnix Mohrmann hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert i yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas df h kl b df h kl i ‘While we have shared past, we do not have a shared memory’ Ulster Museum Lifting the veil of the borderscape A phenomenological research on lived experience and societal processes in Northern Ireland to contribute to the critical potential of the borderscape concept A thesis by Marnix Mohrmann Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Human Geography with specialization in Europe: Borders, Identity and Governance Under supervision of Dr. Olivier Kramsch Second reader: Prof. Dr. Henk van Houtum Internships: Visiting Research Associate at Queen’s University Belfast Radboud University Nijmegen, July 2020 Table of Contents List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................... i Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 SIGNS
    Chapter 2 SIGNS Topic No. 750-000-005 March 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual Revised: November 2017 Signs Section 2.1 USE OF SLIPPERY WHEN WET SIGNS 2.1.1 CONDITIONS FOR USE The District Traffic Operations Engineer shall request the District Maintenance Engineer to erect SLIPPERY WHEN WET (W8-5) signs at locations where it has been determined there is a slippery pavement condition. A slippery pavement is defined when a standard friction test at 40 mph has determined the skid numbers are less than 25. When the posted highway speed is above 45 mph, SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs should be installed when the skid numbers are less than 30, and also one of the following conditions is met: • When the Safety Ratio (Actual Crash Rate divided by the Critical Crash Rate) is greater than or equal to one. • Any downgrade greater than 3 percent. • At intersections with traffic signals. 2.1.2 LOCATION AND PLACEMENT Additional signs may be needed at locations with the following conditions: (1) Horizontal Curves. SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs are to be placed prior to the CURVE sign with an advisory speed plate. The ball-bank indicator provides a reasonable speed through the curve; however, a lower speed may be desired if there are known extraordinary hazards such as hydroplaning. (2) Hydroplaning. Generally, hydroplaning only occurs at speeds above 47 mph; however, excessive runoff across travel lanes may produce hydroplaning at lower speeds. Multi-lane facilities, rutted lanes, built-up shoulders, and downgrades are candidate locations. If excessive water buildup cannot be corrected, then SLIPPERY WHEN WET signs may be appropriate even when skid numbers are greater than 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Non-Mutcd Traffic Signing
    SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1SOo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HOP-06-074 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'l'OV Administration December 2005 NOTICE The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. SYNTHESIS OF NON-MUTCD TRAFFIC SIGNING - [TURNING .. ONE VEHICLES • P VEHICLE PER j GREEN FREEWAY ENDS 1 MILE Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations .~ u,s Departrnonlo1 IrO'1Wo1ation Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-091 If..... Federal Hlgh'l'!,1ay AdmlnistraNon December 2005 Author The author of this report is W. Scott Wainwright, P.E., PTOE. He is a Highway Engineer with the MUTCD Team in FHWA’s Office of Transportation Operations in Washington, DC. Acknowledgements The author wishes to express appreciation to the FHWA Division Office staff in each State and to the many individuals in the State and local transportation departments. Without the assistance of these professionals, who provided the many documents, plans, drawings, and other information about special non-MUTCD signs, this synthesis would not have been possible. Special thanks are also extended to Mr. Fred Ranck of FHWA’s Resource Center in Olympia Fields, Illinois, who provided valuable review comments and suggestions that improved this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Regional Activities and Different Applications Chapter 7
    “An odonym or street name is a proper name that names selected should refer to the history of the country Section 3 Regional activities and different designates a street.” or the city and its memories, to the flora and fauna in its environment. These street names should open up the applications In the same way one could define odonymy as the study world nearby or further away by referring to places or of street names, or, more general, as the study of urban Chapter 7 Street name standardisation countries with which relationships or bonds of friendship names, whether it is street names, names of buildings, exist, with whom cooperation has been established, or institutions, constructions like bridges, public parks, or Brahim Atoui with the world of science, of arts or of sports., etc. even monuments that have an important commemorative character. The attribution of names can be an act of homage or recognition for the great personalities that have marked 7.1 Introduction the history of the location, of the city or the country as Street name standardisation is just as necessary, for both 7.2 Short historical development of street naming: well as of persons with a global impact such as Nobel national and international communication, as place between popular spontaneity and political prize laureates who, by their work or by their acts, have name standardisation. interventions delivered an important contribution to the development and well-being of humanity. In place name standardisation, place names are In the past, it did not use to be the task of the processed by a recognised toponymical authority on the administrative or political authorities in a country to take That is why, in order to give concrete form to this basis of a number of rules and normative criteria that are charge of the street naming process, just as it did not approach, criteria for street name selection will be essentially aimed at guaranteeing the univocity of these take charge of toponymy either.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2D. Guide Signs—Conventional Roads
    201109 Edition Page 151 CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS—CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard: 01 The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any road or street other than low-volume roads (as defined in Section 5A.01), expressways, and freeways. Section 2D.02 Application Support: 01 Guide signs are essential to direct road users along streets and highways, to inform them of intersecting routes, to direct them to cities, towns, villages, or other important destinations, to identify nearby rivers and streams, parks, forests, and historical sites, and generally to give such information as will help them along their way in the most simple, direct manner possible. 02 Chapter 2A addresses placement, location, and other general criteria for signs. Section 2D.03 Color, Retroreflection, and Illumination Support: 01 Requirements for illumination, retroreflection, and color are stated under the specific headings for individual guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard: 02 Except where otherwise provided in this Manual for individual signs or groups of signs, guide signs on streets and highways shall have a white message and border on a green background. All messages, borders, and legends shall be retroreflective and all backgrounds shall be retroreflective or illuminated. Support: 03 Color coding is sometimes used to help road users distinguish between multiple potentially confusing destinations. Examples of valuable uses of color coding include guide signs for roadways approaching or inside an airport property with multiple terminals serving multiple airlines, and community wayfinding guide signs for various traffic generator destinations within a community or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE of CONTENTS
    STREET NAME SIGNS SPECIFICATIONS FOR FABRICATING AND INSTALLING Public Works Department Capital Projects Division Traffic Engineering Section City of Kansas City, Missouri March 2013 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………....1 SIZE AND SHEETING REQUIREMENTS FOR STREET NAME SIGNS …………..2 INSTALLATION OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES……………………...3 - 4 LOCATION OF STREET NAME SIGNS………………………….…………………...5 TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LOCATIONS………………………………………6 NUMBER OF STREET NAME SIGN ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED………..………….7 Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division TABLES AND DRAWINGS TABLE I - LIST OF STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS FOR STREET NAME PREFIXES AND SUFFIXES FIGURE I - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN STANDARD & ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION FIGURE II - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 4 inches) FIGURE III - TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (For Street Name Signs with lettering height of 6 inches) FIGURE IV- TYPICAL STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS (Private Streets) FIGURE V - DIMENSIONS OF STREET NAME SIGN LAYOUTS Street Name Signs Specifications Capital Projects Division INTRODUCTION Kansas City, Missouri Subdivisions Regulations adopted (City Ordinance Number 41498) March 30, 1973 require land developers to provide street name signs in accordance with city specifications at each intersection within new subdivisions. This includes intersections created along the perimeter of developments when new streets are opened and connected to existing streets. All street name sign installations are subject to the approval of the Capital Projects Division and will be considered as part of the overall construction requirements for subdivisions. The approved street name signs must be installed in their proper locations by the developer before final acceptance of street and sidewalk construction by the City Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Minneapolis
    CityofMinneapolis DepartmentofPublicWorks TrafficandParkingServicesDivision PreparedFor: CityofMinneapolis 300BorderAvenueN DesignGuidelines Minneapolis,MN55405 ForBicycleBoulevards PreparedBy: AlliantEngineering,Inc. 233ParkAvenueS,Suite300 Minneapolis,MN55415 FundedBy: April1,2011 April 1, 2011 Minneapolis Public Works Traffic and Parking Services Division Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines The Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) has been prepared for the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department with federal funding provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Non-Motorized Transportation Pilot (NTP) Program. The NTP projects are administered by a non-profit Transit for Livable Communities and implemented through Bike Walk Twin Cities. 1. Bicycle Boulevard Purpose Bicycle boulevards are low-volume and low-speed streets that have been optimized for bicycle travel through treatments such as traffic calming and traffic reduction, roadway signing and pavement markings, and intersection crossing treatments. The purpose of a bicycle boulevard is to improve bicycle safety and circulation, by providing cyclists a designated travel route as an alternative to or as a companion route to using lanes on higher motor vehicle volume streets. Bicycle boulevards take the shared roadway concept to a new level, creating an attractive, comfortable and convenient cycling environment that caters to all cyclist abilities. Although each bicycle boulevard may vary greatly in specific design features, they will all have the same purpose to maintain a low motor vehicle volume and a low motor vehicle speed street with consistent route signing and markings. 2. Goals and Objectives The goal of the Minneapolis Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines (MBBDG) is to establish minimum design standards for bicycle boulevards within the City. The minimum design standards (or basic signing and pavement marking elements) will work to maintain consistency and to create an identity for these types of corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Review ROAD SAFETY
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Review First edition - November 2008 ROAD SAFETY ybybyxbyxbyxbyxbyxbyxbxb United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Review First edition - November 2008 ROAD SAFETY New York and Geneva, 2008 Note The designati ons employed and the presentati on of the material in this publicati on do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nati ons concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authoriti es, or concerning the delimitati on of its fronti ers or boundaries. Acknowledgements The UNECE Transport Division wishes to express its sincere thanks to all those who contributed to this issue of the Transport Review, either with arti cles or through administrati ve services. Copyright noti ce Arti cles are copyright of the author(s) att ributed to it. All other text is copyright of the United Nati ons. All photos and illustrati ons, unless otherwise menti oned, are copyright of UNECE. All rights reserved. Publishing and contact details Published by the United Nati ons Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Transport Division Palais des Nati ons, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland, Tel: +41 (0) 22 917 2401, Fax: +41 (0) 22 917 0039 Email: [email protected], Website: www.unece.org/trans Subscripti ons To subscribe or unsubscribe to the UNECE Transport Review, please send an email to [email protected] Message from Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon This year, more than one million people across the world will die from road traffi c injuries.
    [Show full text]