Analysis of E. T. Hall's Intercultural Communication Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of E. T. Hall's Intercultural Communication Theory A DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION THEORIES OF EDWARD TWITCHEL HALL Introduction Michael has just graduated from a respected college with a major in Spanish. He had four years of vocabulary, grammar, and mock business scenarios, all thoughtfully arranged by his American Spanish professor who had been teaching Spanish for twenty years. Michael could conjugate verbs without thinking, he could translate volumes of Spanish writing accurately, and he was one of the best Spanish speakers among his classmates during weekly presentations. Michael decided to go on a mission trip the summer after his graduation. He was part of a team ministering in Ecuador, a country where nearly everyone speaks Spanish. Michael assumed the transition from the classroom to the real world would not be that difficult. Michael headed to the elevator of the hotel he was staying at in Quito. As the door opened, Michael and three Ecuadorians stepped into the elevator. Michael, nervous, but eager to practice his Spanish said hello and made small talk. He noticed an announcement on the wall of the elevator and turned to read it, all the while continuing his conversation with the Ecuadorians. All of a sudden, no one spoke any more and as the door opened and Michael attempted to say goodbye, all he received were angry looks from the Ecuadorians. What had happened? What had Michael said? The truth is, nothing Michael ‘said’ was offensive. Rather, what his body said for him was the culprit. When Michael had turned his back to read the announcement, the Ecuadorians had been deeply insulted by this offensive gesture. Michael had not realized that communication is much more than speaking the language. More than that, communication looks differently among different cultures. As well prepared as Michael thought he was, he still 1 2 had much to learn about intercultural communication. This paper will examine these deeper aspects of intercultural communication by describing and then analyzing the theories of intercultural communication pioneer Edward T. Hall. It will be shown that Hall relied heavily on insights from the animal kingdom that he attempted to carry over into human behavior. This approach allowed for several new and helpful insights but also prevented Hall from exploring the full range of cultural distinctions existing in a world created in accordance with biblical truth. The Communication Theories of E.T. Hall E. T. Hall is a recognized pioneer for the study of intercultural communication. Hall developed his preliminary positions through years of personal observations of the animal world, living with various cultures, and then completing a doctoral degree in anthropology from Columbia University in 1945. Much of Hall’s work has become the basis for later expansion by other writers. Hall’s main effort was to provide a tool allowing for the categorization and comparison of other cultures so that one might clarify one’s own way of life first, and then to begin to understand something of the other cultures one might encounter. One of Hall’s main contributions to the discussion is his theory that culture is communication. Prior to Hall, a complete theory of culture as communication had not been presented in one place.1 The following section will survey Hall’s cultural distinctions that he has used to prove that culture communicates. Culture: The Hidden Dimension Culture is everywhere but is so innate that it is often not recognized until one ventures elsewhere. A proverb says, “A man who has never travelled thinks his mama’s cooking is the 1Edward Hall, The Silent Language (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1959), 55. 3 best.” There certainly are visible aspects of a culture such as the dress of the locals. However, Hall notes that the most important aspects of differing cultures are likely to be those “out-of- awareness” features, the hidden dimension of the new culture.2 One might think that this hidden aspect of culture would pale in comparison to the visible behaviors but Hall goes on to say, “Culture hides much more than it reveals, and strangely enough what it hides, it hides most effectively from its own participants.”3 The hidden dimension of a culture, much like the submerged part of an iceberg, makes up the bulk of the culture and keeps the visible component afloat. Each aspect of culture carries with it a message that is read one way by the insider and read, perhaps, another way by the outsider. Culture communicates, but, prior to Hall, its message was not clearly discernable. Upon first notice, language is a blur of sound, an indistinguishable jumble. As the learner perseveres, syllables become coherent, then words, then a pattern of grammar, then how something is said, and then, why something is said the way it was. Educated and insightful observation reveals more and more subtleties within the spoken language. Learning a culture is similar to learning a language. At first the new sights, sounds, and smells are a blur of confusion. Everything blends together. As time goes by, however, the acute observer will begin to notice certain distinctions. What is done and how it is done begin to communicate a message just as powerful as the spoken language.4 Hall was the first to develop a framework for observing culture. He notes that the first step is to learn how to recognize cultural distinctives. First, it is important to see that Hall has 2Ibid., 52. 3Ibid., 53. 4Ibid., 124. 4 broken culture into two broad components, what he calls Set Theory. The pervasive set is that which is first noticeable.5 The tip of the cultural iceberg might be composed of dress, language, seating arrangements, or greeting protocol. The second half of Hall’s Set Theory is the illusive set, the phantom component of culture.6 The illusive set contains stress on words, pitch, or tone. Other examples would be worldview, gender roles, and status roles. Set Theory helps the cultural observer to look for the complete picture of culture. Hall has pioneered what he calls the Primary Message Systems (PMS) that are present in every culture. These systems were largely lifted from Hall’s and others observations of animal communities. The perceptive observer will look for the pervasive and illusive components within each system. The ten dimensions of the PMS are outlined below: Hall’s Primary Message Systems7 1. Interaction – speech, tone, voice, gesture, play, and defense. 2. Association – The ‘pecking order.’ Rank and societal structure. 3. Subsistence – Food, work, distinction within work (who cleans the toilet?). 4. Bisexuality – gender roles, sexual norms, and expectations. 5. Territoriality – use of space. 6. Temporality – rhythm of life, linear or cyclical history, rate of speech. 7. Learning – Logical vs. experiencial. How is knowledge transferred? Who goes to school? 8. Play – intertwined with the other systems. 9. Defense – Against nature, against the spiritual - religion, and against enemies. 10. Exploitation – of society, nature, ect. for the culture’s own gain. Space constraints prevent a more detailed explanation of each system. Hall’s point is that these ten systems are present in every culture and are interrelated. The categories provide a framework by which to systematically observe and learn a new culture. Notice that language is only one small aspect of culture and all ten systems work together to allow cultural communication to 5Ibid., 129. 6Ibid., 136. 7Ibid., 61-81. 5 occur. A further distinction made by Hall is that these systems are played out on three levels in a society: the formal, informal, and the technical. Hall calls these levels the major triad.8 Time is useful to illustrate the distinctions of the triad. Formal time would be what the clock says. An important meeting is scheduled to begin at 10:00 A.M. Informal time would be saying it is 10:00 A.M. when it is really 10:02 A.M. Precision is not needed because a general, informal answer is sufficient. Technical time might come into play in the finals of the 100-meter dash at the Olympics. It is not enough to say the winner clocked 9.7 seconds (formal time) or 10 seconds (informal time), when he actually clocked precisely 9.73 seconds – ahead of second place in 9.77 seconds. This level of technical precision would seem culturally out of place if the boss called a meeting to begin at exactly 10:08.05 A.M., not before or after. Now that some of Hall’s general theories such as PMS and set theory have been introduced, it is helpful to describe several of Hall’s sub-categories of culture. The cultural distinctions listed below are those primarily developed by Hall. Chronemics The first distinction to be understood is chronemics or the use of time. Time is a language of its own. Time can speak more plainly than words, coming through loud and clear. Various cultures view and use time differently. In the U.S., a mid-day call may be viewed neutrally and not be answered, while an early morning call brings urgency, and a middle of the night call could signal a matter of life or death.9 Time can be used to send a message of coldness 8Ibid., 87. 9Ibid., 25. 6 if an appointment is kept waiting or time can convey importance if an unexpected appointment is ‘squeezed in’ right away. Navajo and other indigenous peoples can view time like space, whereas only what is immediately visible is real. The future has little reality because it cannot be seen and we are not ‘there’ yet.10 Other cultures have an orientation toward the past, where events can ‘stack up’ and weigh heavily on the present.
Recommended publications
  • Central Problems in Cultural Studies
    Central Problems in Cultural Studies 1 Language and Material For Marxism, culture is a corporeal force locked into the socially organized production of the material conditions of existence. Marxism has argued that the material mode of production is ‘the real foundation’ of cultural superstructures. That is, the material – understood here as the economic – determines the cultural. However, this orthodox reading of Marx proved to be too mechanical and deterministic in exploring the specific features of culture. Consequently, the narrative of cultural studies involves a distancing of itself from Marxist reductionism. Instead, the analysis of the autonomous logic of language, culture, representation and consumption was placed in the foreground. – Barker, pp. 25-26 2 The Textual Character of Culture Most students of cultural studies are aware that culture can be read as a text, using concepts like signification, code or discourse. However, an emphasis on structuralist and poststructuralist accounts of signification has sometimes led cultural studies to reify language as a ‘thing’ or ‘system’ rather than grasp it as a social practice. – Barker, p. 26 3 The metaphor of culture as ‘like a language’ has a great deal to recommend it. However, there is also much to be gained by describing culture in terms of practices, routines and spatial arrangements. Not only is language always embedded in practice, but also all practices signify. Further, the identification of textual codes and subject positions does not guarantee that the proscribed meanings are ‘taken up’ by concrete persons in daily life (see Ang, 1985; Morley, 1992). – Barker, p. 26 4 The Location of Culture For Raymond Williams (1981, 1983) culture is located, for all intents and purposes, within flexible but identifiable boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ART, TECHNOLOGY, and HIGH ART/LOW CULTURE DEBATES in CANONICAL AMERICAN ART HISTORY I. Overview in His Media Ar
    CHAPTER ONE: ART, TECHNOLOGY, AND HIGH ART/LOW CULTURE DEBATES IN CANONICAL AMERICAN ART HISTORY I. Overview In his Media Art History, Hans-Peter Schwarz of the Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe, Germany (ZKM) wrote: “The history of the new media [sic] is inextricably linked with the history of the project of the modern era as a whole. It can only be described as the evolution of the human experience of reality, i.e. of the social reality relationship in the modern age.” I begin with his words, which have strong resonance for me, perhaps beyond his initial intent or ultimate direction. His astute triangulation of those three concepts—new media history, the project of the modern era, and “social reality”—form the nexus of my theoretical investigation. For it seems that current social realities and the project of the modern era largely govern new media’s reception within the Western art history canon. Perhaps clarity regarding the ideological interconnection of these three elements will only be possible with more historical distance. However, this dissertation represents a step toward a better understanding of the sometimes-vicious canonical opposition to the fusion of art and technology, in light of these intersections. Key are his two phrases: “the project of the modern era,” and “the evolution of the human experience of reality, i.e. of the social reality relationship in the modern age.” On the basis of Schwarz’s text, I take the second phrase to mean the dehumanization that results from industrialization and modern warfare. In regard to artistic production, he rightly underscores the abrupt reorganization of vision precipitated by, for example, developments in photography and cinematography during the early modernist period.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturalistic Design: Design Approach to Create Products
    CULTURALISTIC DESIGN: DESIGN APPROACH TO CREATE PRODUCTS FOR SPECIFIC CULTURAL AND SUBCULTURAL GROUPS Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not include proprietary or classified information. Brandon J. Allen Certificate of Approval: Bret Smith Tin Man Lau, Chair Professor Professor Industrial Design Industrial Design Tsai Lu Liu George T. Flowers Assistant Professor Dean Industrial Design Graduate School CULTURALISTIC DESIGN: DESIGN APPROACH TO CREATE PRODUCTS FOR SPECIFIC CULTURAL AND SUBCULTURAL GROUPS Brandon J. Allen A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Industrial Design Auburn, Alabama May 9, 2009 CULTURALISTIC DESIGN: DESIGN APPROACH TO CREATE PRODUCTS FOR SPECIFIC CULTURAL AND SUBCULTURAL GROUPS Brandon J. Allen Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. Signature of Author Date of Graduation iii THESIS ABSTRACT CULTURALISTIC DESIGN: DESIGN APPROACH TO CREATE PRODUCTS FOR SPECIFIC CULTURAL AND SUBCULTURAL GROUPS Brandon J. Allen Master of Industrial Design, May 9, 2009 (B.I.D., Auburn University, 2005) 93 Typed Pages Directed by Tin Man Lau Designers have a unique process for solving problems commonly referred to as design thinking. Design thinking, especially on a cultural level can be used to tackle a wide range of creative and business issues. Design thinking with true cultural infusion is known as “Culturalistic Design”, and can have profound and varying effects on product designs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Straightedge Subculture on the Internet: a Case Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2003 The Straightedge Subculture on the Internet: A Case Study James Patrick Williams University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, James Patrick, "The Straightedge Subculture on the Internet: A Case Study. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2358 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by James Patrick Williams entitled "The Straightedge Subculture on the Internet: A Case Study." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology. , Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Thomas C. Hood, Suzanne B. Kurth, Sherry Cable, Handel Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by J. Patrick Williams entitled “The Straightedge Subculture on the Internet: A Case Study.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Theory and Popular Culture by John Storey
    CUL T CULTURAL FIFTH EDITION U FIFTH EDITION R THEORYAND JOHN STOREY AL POPULAR THEORY CULTURE AN INTRODUCTION AN CULTURAL D In this fifth edition of his successful Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction, John Storey has extensively revised the text throughout. As before, the book presents a clear and critical survey P of competing theories of and various approaches to popular culture. O PULA Retaining the accessible approach of previous editions, and using relevant and appropriate examples from the texts and practices of popular culture, this new edition remains a key introduction to the area. AND R THEORY NEW TO THIS EDITION CUL • Extensively revised, rewritten and updated • Improved and expanded content throughout including: • New chapter on ‘Race’, racism and representation T U • New sections on the Panoptic Machine and Convergence Culture RE • Continued explicit links to the new edition companion reader Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader POPULAR • More illustrative diagrams and images AN INTRODUCTION • Fully revised, improved and updated companion website at www.pearsoned.co.uk/storey providing practice questions and extension activities, as well as annotated links to relevant sites on the web and further reading, and a glossary of key terms, to promote further understanding of the study of cultural theory and popular culture The new edition remains essential reading for undergraduate and postgraduate students of cultural studies, media studies, communication studies, the sociology of culture, popular culture and other related subjects. CULTURE JOHN STOREY is Professor of Cultural Studies and Director of the Centre for Research in Media and Cultural Studies at the University of Sunderland.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Why Popular Culture Matters
    Introduction: Why Popular Culture Matters CARRIELYNN D. REINHARD This is my first issue as the new editor for this journal, so please grant me some leeway to address the question of why popular culture matters being highlighted in these pages, including with our first attempt at a multimedia, interactive component. Please indulge my brief time on the soap box to explain my perspective to hopefully clarify my approach as the Editor of this journal. I come to this—field? discipline? interest? passion?—from three separate perspectives: communication studies, fan studies, and psychology. I am fascinated with how people make sense of themselves, each other, and the world around them. Being a fan provides a particular slant to these sense-makings and can shape, and be shaped by, communication. I see all interactions with others as communicating because meaning is always exchanged. Sometimes that meaning is exchanged in a word; sometimes a picture; sometimes a cake; sometimes a slap. As a part of a person’s identity, fandom informs, is created through, and impacts others through communication. The context or situation in which the communication occurs also shapes these interactions. Time of day. Place. Participants. So many factors impact what we communicate, how, and why. Popular culture comes in through our fandoms and our situations. Popular culture is popular. It is for the public. The masses. For everyday working folk who perhaps could not afford the “finer” things of a society or culture but still find meaning and solidarity through so-called “low culture.” Popular culture helps people handle the drudgery of labor for the profit of others.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Proposing a Multiplicity of Meanings
    SHIRLEY R. STEINBERG 5. PROPOSING A MULTIPLICITY OF MEANINGS Research Bricolage and Cultural Pedagogy In the contemporary information environment of the twenty-first century-so aptly named hyperreality by Jean Baudrillard, knowledge takes on a different shape and quality. What appears to be commonsense dissipates slowly into the ether, as electronic media refract the world in ways that benefit the purveyors of power. We have never seen anything like this before, a new world – new forms of social regulation, new forms of disinformation, and new modes of hegemony and ideology. In such a cyber/mediated jungle new modes of research are absolutely necessary. This chapter proposes a form of critical cultural studies research that explores what I refer to as cultural pedagogy. Cultural pedagogy is the educational dimension of hyperreality, as learning migrates into new socio-cultural and political spaces. In these pages, I will focus my attention on my research with film, specifically on doing educational research with a bricolage of methods leading to tentative interpretations. Relating to the hyperreality of the times, I am asserting that the notion of one orthodox methodology cannot achieve a rich text and present a multiplicity of meanings: essential components in contemporary research. CRITICAL CULTURAL STUDIES Observing that the study of culture can be fragmented between the disciplines, those who advocate cultural studies look at an interdisciplinary approach, that which transcends any one field. Additionally, a critical cultural studies does not commit a qualitative evaluation of culture by a definition of “high” or “low” culture, and culture may be the most ambiguous and complex term to define in the domain of the social sciences and humanities.
    [Show full text]
  • High Culture As Subculture: Brisbane’S Contemporary Chamber Music Scene
    HIGH CULTURE AS SUBCULTURE: BRISBANE’S CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER MUSIC SCENE By Jean Burgess B. Mus (Hons), B. Arts (Hons) A Dissertation presented in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History at the University of Queensland. January 2004 Declaration The work presented in this dissertation is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original and my own work, except as acknowledged in the text, and the material has not been submitted, either in whole or in part, for a degree at this or any other university. The primary research project on which parts of this dissertation are based was subject to and cleared by a departmental ethical review according to the requirements of the University of Queensland. Jean Burgess ii Abstract The aim of the dissertation is to discover the extent to which methodologies and conceptual frameworks used to understand popular culture may also be useful in the attempt to understand contemporary high culture. The dissertation addresses this question through the application of subculture theory to Brisbane’s contemporary chamber music scene, drawing on a detailed case study of the contemporary chamber ensemble Topology and its audiences. The dissertation begins by establishing the logic and necessity of applying cultural studies methodologies to contemporary high culture. This argument is supported by a discussion of the conceptual relationships between cultural studies, high culture, and popular culture, and the methodological consequences of these relationships. In Chapter 2, a brief overview of interdisciplinary approaches to music reveals the central importance of subculture theory, and a detailed survey of the history of cultural studies research into music subcultures follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    Notes Introduction 1. I include in the Caribbean not only the islands of the Caribbean archipelago but the circum-Caribbean coasts of the mainland Americas, which were characterized by plantation and slave societies; thus, parts of Brazil, Mexico, Guyana, and other mainland nations are included in my discussion. Although I have made a conscious effort not to gener- alize on the basis of the English-speaking Caribbean, and have drawn on the discursive histories of hybridity in the French and Spanish Caribbean, my linguistic competence does not extend to all of the region’s numerous colonial, indigenous, and contact languages. Regrettably, this study repeats Caribbean Studies’ marginalization of the Dutch Caribbean—a marginalization that arises from the number of local Dutch Caribbean contact/languages, the paucity of transla- tions, and the Netherlands’ own relative marginality to the centers of European power. I also dwell only briefly in this book on the large dias- poric Caribbean populations and hybridities. Both these omissions are corrected in Puri, ed., Marginal Migrations: The Circulation of Cultures within the Caribbean. 2. The Predicament of Culture 173. Conversely, García Canclini, writing from within the discipline of Latin American Studies, writes “All cultures are frontier cultures.” 3. For an argument that shares my critique, see Mimi Sheller, “Theoretical Piracy on the High Seas of Global Culture.” 4. Nor did this usage die with the nineteenth century. In South Africa, the rhetoric of pluralism often operated as a code word for apartheid. In the context of tensions between Afro- and Indo-Caribbean populations in the present-day Caribbean, the invocation of “pluralism” by some conservative cultural nationalists is also a euphemism for “separate but equal.” (See chapters six and seven.) Although the emphasis today may have shifted from racial to cultural hybridity, the distinctions between race and culture—or for that matter between race and ethnicity—are far from secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Identity
    AS Sociology For AQA [2nd Edition] Chris. Livesey and Tony Lawson Unit 1: Culture and Identity Contents 1. Different conceptions of culture, including subculture, mass 107 culture, high and low culture, popular culture, global culture. 2. The Socialisation Process and the Role of Agencies of 120 Socialisation. 3. Sources and Different Conceptions of the Self, Identity and 126 Difference. 4. The Relationship of Identity to Age, Disability, Ethnicity, 135 Gender, Nationality, Sexuality and Social Class in Contemporary Society. 5. Leisure, consumption and identity. 158 1. Different conceptions of culture, including subculture, mass culture, high and low culture, popular culture, global culture. Secondly, we can note a basic distinction between two Culture: Introduction dimensions of culture: Material culture consists of the physical objects Culture is a significant concept for sociologists because (“artifacts”), such as cars, mobile phones and books, a it both identifies a fundamental set of ideas about what society produces and which reflect cultural knowledge, sociologists’ study and suggests a major reason for the skills, interests and preoccupations. existence of Sociology itself – that human social behaviour can be explained in the context of the social Non-Material culture, on the other hand, consists of the groups into which people are born and within which knowledge and beliefs that influence people’s they live their lives. behaviour. In our culture, for example, behaviour may be influenced by religious beliefs (such as Christianity, In this Chapter we’re going to explore a range of ideas Islam or Buddhism) and / or scientific beliefs – your relating to both culture and its counterpart, identity view of human evolution, for example, has probably and to do this we need to develop both a working been influenced by Darwin’s (1859) theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Intercultural Learning in English for Specific Academic Purposes
    INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL LEARNING IN ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC ACADEMIC PURPOSES MICHAEL JOSEPH ENNIS LANGUAGE CENTRE, FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN-BOLZANO Abstract This chapter describes the application of an integrated approach to teaching foreign languages and intercultural competence to English for Specific Academic Purposes. The chapter summarizes how aspects of intercultural learning were integrated in an English for Tourism Studies course offered within the framework of a Bachelor’s Degree program in Tourism, Sport, and Event Management at a trilingual university in northern Italy. After an overview of the most common approaches, models, and methods used to teach culture and intercultural competence in foreign language education in Europe and North America, the chapter discusses the reasons these tend to be ineffective in this unique learning context: namely due to their separate treatment of language and culture, which would require the reallocation of scarce instructional hours from language learning to intercultural learning. The chapter then briefly summarizes a fully integrated model of teaching language, culture, and communication as a more viable alternative. The chapter concludes with a description of a sample lesson as a demonstration of how intercultural learning was integrated without losing focus on learning specific language features, discourse patterns, and communication skills, which are necessary in all ESAP contexts. Keywords: English for Specific (Academic) Purposes; English for Tourism (Studies); Integrated/Integrative Approaches to Language and Culture; Intercultural Competence; Intercultural Education Ennis, M. J. (2017b). Integrating intercultural learning in English for specific academic purposes. In M. J. Ennis & C. E. Riley (Eds.), Practices in intercultural language teaching and learning (pp. 145-168).
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Communication Globalization and Social Justice Second Edffion
    Intercultural Communication Globalization and Social Justice Second Edffion Kathryn Sorrells 50YEARS California State University, Northridge SAGE was founded in 1965 by Sara Miller McCune to support the dissemination of usable knowledge by publishing innovative and high-quality research and teaching content. Today, we publish more than 850 journals, including those of more than 300 learned societies, more than 800 new books per year, and a growing range of library products including archives, data, case studies, reports, and video. SAGE remains majority-owned by our founder, and after Sara's lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures our continued independence. Los Angeles ILondon INew Delhi ISingapore IWashington DC ()SAGE Los Angeles ILondon INew Delhi Singapore IWashington DC 4 INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION CHAPTER 1 Opening the Conversation 5 and ethnocentrism. This chapter ends a discussion of intercultural praxis. As we "open the originator of the field of intercultural communication, were trained as anthropologists. the conversation," I invite you to engage with me in an ongoing process of learning, reflect with training programs on culture and communication for diplomats going abroad on assign In the 1950s, Edward T. Hall, along with others at the Foreign Service Institute, developed to your everyday experiences. ing, and critiquing what I have to say about intercu!tural communication and how it applies particular attention to nonverbal communication and tacit or out of awareness levels of ment. Hall's applied approach, focusing on the micro-level of human interaction with DEFINITIONS OF CULTURE information exchange, established the foundation for the field of intercultural communica- tion (Rogers, Hart, & Miike, 2002).
    [Show full text]