DOCSLIB.ORG

Preserving the Archaeological Past in Turkey and Greece the J.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preserving the Archaeological Past in Turkey and Greece the J.M Preserving the Archaeological Past in Turkey and Greece THE J.M. KAPLAN FUND GRANTMAKING INITIATIVE, 2007-2015 PRESERVING THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PAST IN TURKEY AND GREECE The J.M. Kaplan Fund Grantmaking Initiative, 2007 –2015 2 THE J.M. KAPLAN FUND www.jmkfund.org Published by The J.M. Kaplan Fund 71 West 23rd Street, 9th Floor New York, NY 10010 Preserving the Archaeological Past in Turkey and Greece publication copyright © 2017 The J.M. Kaplan Fund. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. Publication design by BRADY ART www.bradyart.com Cover: Anastylosis of the Propylon at Aphrodisias, Turkey Right: Temple of Artemis at Sardis, Turkey 3 4 CONTENTS 6 FOREWORD By Ken Lustbader 8 INTRODUCTION 12 GRANTMAKING MAP SITE PRESERVATION GRANTS NEOLITHIC PERIOD 14 Göbekli Tepe 20 Çatalhöyük BRONZE AGE PERIOD 24 Mochlos & Ayios Vasileios 30 Pylos 32 Tell Atchana & Tell Tayinat IRON AGE PERIOD 36 Kınık Höyük 38 Gordion ARCHAIC-CLASSICAL PERIOD 42 Labraunda HELLENISTIC PERIOD 46 Delos ROMAN PERIOD 50 Aphrodisias 56 Ephesus BYZANTINE PERIOD 60 Hierapolis 64 Kızıl Kilise (Red Church), Cappadocia 66 Meryem Ana Kilise (Mother of God Church), Cappadocia 68 Ani 5 MULTI-PERIOD SITES 72 Pergamon 76 Sardis 80 Karkemish CAPACITY BUILDING GRANTS 82 REGRANTING PROGRAM Institute for Aegean Prehistory Study Center for East Crete 83 CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, & WORKSHOPS Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations Istanbul Kultur University German Archaeological Institute at Athens Technical Educational Institute of Athens 86 SITE MANAGEMENT & PLANNING American School of Classical Studies at Athens 87 FELLOWSHIP & INTERNSHIP FOR SITE MANAGEMENT Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations University of Pennsylvania 88 DOCUMENTATION Archaeological Settlements of Turkey Project APPENDIX 89 Index of Awards in Turkey and Greece, 2007–2015 93 Site Visits 94 Photography Credits 95 Acknowledgments image: Church of the Holy Redeemer 6 FOREWORD Between 2007 and 2015, I was fortunate to work with the By the end of 2008, it became clear that the board had a collective board and staff of The J.M. Kaplan Fund overseeing its cultural interest in Ancient Greek and Roman architecture and archaeol- heritage grantmaking.This was a dream job, since I had previously ogy, but I still needed to devise a grantmaking rationale. The best worked on the other side of the table in the not-for-profit pres- approach would be to develop a multi-year program to support ervation sector. Now I had the resources to develop grantmaking site preservation projects in a specific country or region, based on strategies that could catalyze projects, with potential funding a specific period of significance. To this end, we explored countries already in hand. in the Near to Middle East with a significant number of ancient sites, identifying potential partners and projects. Turkey was a This publication summarizes a portion of the preservation pro- lead contender, with its renowned collection of historic resourc- gram during my tenure focused on architectural and archaeologi- es spanning multiple eras, including Ancient Greek and Roman cal conservation projects in the Aegean Basin, specifically in Turkey archaeological sites in need of conservation. Additionally, Turkey and Greece. Through research, pluck, and serendipity, I worked was a good fit due to the board’s prior familiarity with Meryem with the board to develop a diverse portfolio of almost 30 projects Ana Kilise (Mother of God Church) in Cappadocia, where it that ranged from a prominent reconstruction at Aphrodisias, funded a project in 2007 through the World Monuments Fund. to installing a massive chain link security fence at Göbekli Tepe, to training Greek and Turkish conservators, to land acquisition The country was also a logical choice since the Turkish Ministry at Ayios Vasileios. of Culture and Tourism had recently begun promulgating the conservation of its archaeological heritage as part of licensed When I joined the Fund, I was familiar with its reputation and excavation projects. Historically, such projects focused on pedigree as one of the country’s most influential supporters of research and publication, but the Ministry was now emphasizing historic preservation, especially in New York City and New York archaeological conservation to ensure the preservation of sites State. What I didn’t know was that the Fund had embarked upon vital to its tourism industry. This presented an opportunity for preservation initiatives around the world, beginning in 2000 under the Fund to support conservation projects in Turkey, since most the leadership of J.M.’s grandchildren. excavation teams had little or no funding for this critical work. One of my initial tasks was to develop a strategy for this inter- I then began the task of identifying potential partners and projects national preservation portfolio. The board asked me to identify for site preservation projects in Turkey by cold-calls, emails, and projects where the Fund’s support would help conserve great word-of-mouth inquiries. To survey potential projects first-hand, works of archaeology and architecture. This was akin to finding a group of board members and I made an expedition to Turkey in a needle in a haystack, given the wide parameters of exploration June 2009, which included site visits, meetings with archaeologists and vast number of sites where the Fund’s philanthropic support and architects, and exposure to cultural heritage practices. This could create change. It was also a crash course in archaeology, since one-week trip was a primer on all things related to historic preser- my professional background had primarily focused on 19th- and vation and site conservation. From early morning to late at night, 20th-century architecture in New York City. we crisscrossed the country from Istanbul to Cappadocia and places in between, including Aphrodisias and Ephesus. Our bus Over the next year I reached out to experts and organizations became a traveling classroom, where board members peppered in the field of international cultural heritage to identify issues, me with questions on topics from archaeological management opportunities, and needs. This wide-ranging inquiry offered a to materials testing. We also tried to seize every opportunity. In wealth of ideas and advice, if not a clear-cut strategy. Through one instance, we learned that Kızıl Kilise (Red Church), a dete- the generous guidance of colleagues, I identified a number of riorating 5th-century church, wasn’t far from where we were in potential projects, which culminated in a handful of site preser- Cappadocia. So we detoured an extra two hours to visit this ruin, vation grants awarded in Turkey, Tunisia, Pakistan, and India in set amid a picturesque field. On the trip back to our hotel, we partnership with the World Monuments Fund and the Aga Khan strategized how the Fund could help, and six months later a grant Historic Cities Programme. was awarded to stabilize this important site. 7 Upon our return, I worked with the board to develop projects Collectively, the grants profiled in this publication embody the based on criteria including resource significance, organizational Fund’s entrepreneurial history while meeting the program’s goal capacity, project budget, risk and reward, and completion sched- of using philanthropic support to conserve significant sites for ule. Over time, I was introduced to a number of excavation teams, the public. The images and text provide the facts, but they don’t enabling me to develop a portfolio of potential site preserva- convey the importance of the valuable relationships that were tion projects that focused on prioritized conservation. The first cultivated over nine years. Those personal connections, and the grants were awarded in late 2009, primarily focusing on specific board’s nimble grantmaking, allowed me to respond to wonder- conservation projects. ful restoration projects as well as to the chance encounters that were cultivated into funding opportunities. Grantmaking continued through 2010 and 2011, as I built rela- tionships with American, European, and Turkish colleagues to I am grateful for this rewarding professional experience that develop specific projects. Following productive conversations helped address pragmatic conservation needs in the Aegean and exchanges with these archaeologists, architects, and con- Basin. I hope that this publication offers a glimpse into our work servators, I recommended expanding the initial site preservation in these two culturally rich countries. strategy to include conservation training and education. New grants were awarded that included opportunities for Turkish na- Ken Lustbader tionals to partake in conservation training, seminars in archaeo- Director logical management, and conservation fellowships. Historic Preservation (2007–2015) By 2014, the Fund had built a strong track record as a respected funder of conservation projects in Turkey. It became clear that we couldn’t ignore the reality that nearby Greece was in the midst of an economic crisis, with severe impacts upon cultural resources: sites were closed, conservation staffs eliminated, and government employees forced into early retirement. These cuts were creating long-term, corrosive problems, and the board and I agreed to explore how philanthropic support could help. These inquiries led to my recommendation that we expand the geo- graphic focus of grantmaking across the Aegean Basin to include both Turkey and Greece. The Fund thus set out to identify promising opportunities in Greece. To address the unemployment and under-employment of Greek cultural heritage professionals, grantmaking focused on training and education tied to archaeological conservation proj- ects. This provided ongoing opportunities for hands-on training in the field, classroom education, and emergency repairs in need of funding. As in Turkey, I identified committed partners at insti- tutes and universities in order to develop potential grants that would assist with the training of Greek conservators in tandem with site preservation. 8 INTRODUCTION Giving the past a future Between 2007 and 2015, The J.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Late Roman Unguentaria of Sagalassos
    BaBesch 74 (1999) The Late Roman Unguentaria of Sagalassos R. Degeest, R. Ottenburgs, H. Kucha, W. Viaene, P. Degryse, M. Waelkens 1. INTRODUCTION them, as was for instance the case with the publica- tion of the Ernst von Sieglin collection8. The precise The city of Sagalassos, the ruins of which are situ- origin of this pottery type could never be determined, ated on the western slopes of the Taurus mountain although Hayes considered a possible production range in southern Asia Minor, was already a town centre located somewhere in the Palestine-Lebanon in its own right when Alexander the Great subdued area. The vessels bear a marked resemblance to ear- it by force in 333 B.C. After this event the city lier Nabataean ceramics, at least as far as ware fab- remained in existence for nearly a millennium until ric and colouring are concerned9. The vessel shapes it was finally abandoned somewhere around the are different however, and there is a hiatus of sev- middle of the 7th century. The site has been under- eral centuries between the wares. Also, publications going excavation by an international team directed of archaeological material from this region fail to by M. Waelkens since the beginning of the nineties1. produce significant numbers of these vessels. Among the many finds a series of slender fusiform Logically it could be assumed that greater numbers vessels, called “Late Roman Unguentaria” by J.W. of finds would be present near the production area. Hayes2, have always attracted attention in In fact based on the quantitative evidence so far Sagalassos, because they are so distinctive when available for Constantinople, Limyra, Perge, and compared to the usual Sagalassos wares.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Çakirlar, Canan; Marston, John
    University of Groningen Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Çakirlar, Canan; Marston, John Published in: Environmental Archaeology DOI: 10.1080/14614103.2017.1385890 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2019 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Çakirlar, C., & Marston, J. (2019). Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey). Environmental Archaeology, 24(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2017.1385890 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 25-09-2021 Environmental Archaeology The Journal of Human Palaeoecology ISSN: 1461-4103 (Print) 1749-6314 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yenv20 Rural Agricultural Economies and Military Provisioning at Roman Gordion (Central Turkey) Canan Çakırlar & John M.
    [Show full text]
  • Concert Choir Tour in TURKEY an Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations
    Concert Choir Tour in TURKEY An Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations Choir Tour in rt U R K E T U R K E ce T Y UR T Y n KE U R K E Co Y T Y s A n n CHOIR o CHOIR O i p t p a o c r o GROUPS t L u GROUPS n n i a t i y t s t i o r T S h C T U Si n c T R g U S i r K U i o n Ut O R H s T i T T K U T O U U T R S K U T O U An Opportunity to Sing in Historic Christian Locations alk in the footsteps of Paul and John. Travel to sites connected with Paul’s First, Second and Third Missionary Journeys W(Attalia, Perge, Aspendos, Pisidian Antioch, Loadicea, Hierapolis, Ephesus) and the Seven Churches (Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea) to whom John wrote the Book of Revelation. Added to these magnificent biblical sites is a two-day visit to Istanbul where you can enjoy its rich historical sites and impressive archeological museum, as well as a short cruise on the Bosphorus Sea. BLACK SEA ISTANBUL CANAKKALE ALEXANDER TROAS TURKEY A PERGAMON E S SARDIS PHILADELPHIA PSIDIAN ANTIOCH N IZMIR PAMUKKALE A EPHESUS (HIERAPOLIS) E LAODICEA G E A ANTALYA PERGE DAY 01 FRI DEPART USA EA DAY 02 SAT ARRIVE ISTANBUL MEDITERRANEAN S DAY 03 SUN ISTANBUL DAY 04 MON ISTANBUL - FLY ANTALYA DAY 05 THU PERGA - ASPENDOS - ANTALYA DAY 06 FRI ANTIOCH OF PISIDIA – LAODICEA - PAMUKKALE DAY 07 SAT HIERAPOLIS - PHILADELPHIA - SARDIS - IZMIR DAY 08 SUN PERGAMUM - IZMIR DAY 09 MON EPHESUS - KUSADASI DAY 10 TUE SMYRNA - IZMIR DAY 11 WED IZMIR AIRPORT - FLY BACK HOME PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE: Sun, Day 3 Morning Worship Service followed by a short concert performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silk Roads Mecca (Haiphong) Hanoi PACIFIC Suakin INDIAN the Silk Roads Are Part of a Vast Region Comprised SUBCONTINENT OCEAN
    l a r Prague Krakow Kiev U Seine Volga Paris Rostov On Don EURASIAN STEPPES Karakorum Rhone Elista Lyon Venice Crimea Astrakhan Syr Darya (Iaxartes) MONGOLIAN STEPPES Shanh-du CAUCASUS A RA L Urumqi (Xanadu) Genoa CA S P I A N S E A Danube Turfan BLACK SEA Amu Darya (Oxus) Otrar Porto BALKANS DerbentSEA Khiva Istanbul Tbilisi Kuqa GOBI DESERT Barcelona (Constantinople) (Khwarezm) Beijing Rome Trebizond Kokand Ferghana Dunhuang Bursa Shaki He Huang (Khanbalik) Valencia CENTRAL ASIA Xinjiang Sardis Baku P K JAPAN Lisbon ANATOLIA Erzurum Bukhara E O Aras Samarkand Kashgar N R Ephesus Konya Tabriz Nisa Merv Pyongyang IN E Athens Dara S A Cordoba Granada Gorgan U N Alanya Antioch Nishapur Khotan Penglai Seoul L Nisibis Balkh A Gyengju Aleppo (Bactra) YELLOW Busan Palmyra Rayy Osaka Fez Ecbatana Loyang SEA MEDITERRANEAN SEA Tyre Bagdad IRANIAN Taxila PLATEAU OF TIBET Fukuoka Nara Damascus Ctesiphon PLATEAU Xi'an Yangzhou Tigris Nagasaki Tripoli Jerusalem MESOPOTAMIA (Changan) Alexandria Gaza E Isfahan Nanjing u Harappa Petra p Qalhat Cairo hr ArvandSusa Chengdu Hangzhou ate Chang JiangWuhan s PERSIAN GULF Ningbo Apologos Delhi Qusair Siraf s ( Myos-Hormos) Hormuz u Ganges d n I Foochow Leuce Come Karachi CHINA (Fuzhou) GULF Brahamaputra Medina Zaitun Sohar OF OMAN Canton ARABIAN Barbaricon (Ghuangzhou) (Qhuanzhou) Jeddah Muscat PENINSULA Barygaza Tamralipti Cattigara Nile R E D S E A Qalhat Macau The Silk Roads Mecca (Haiphong) Hanoi PACIFIC Suakin INDIAN The Silk Roads are part of a vast region comprised SUBCONTINENT OCEAN Salalah Pegu M of a network of maritime and land routes. ARABIAN SEA e k o Bolinao n San’a Goa g Hội An They pass through South Asia and Southeast Cana Muza BAY OF BENGAL SOUTH Asia, crossing the Central Asian subcontinent, Aden Madras CHINA the Russian steppes, the Iranian and Anatolian Calicut Pondicherry SEA plateaus, and the Arabian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • 1957'Den Bugüne Türkiye'deki İtalyan Arkeoloji Heyetleri
    Missioni Archeologiche Italiane in Turchia dal 1957 ad Oggi 1957’den Bugüne .. Türkiye’deki İtalyan Arkeoloji Heyetleri Il 1957 ha segnato l'avvio delle attività di ricerca archeologica italiana in Turchia. Questa pubblicazione è dedicata alle numerose missioni archeologiche italiane che da allora continuano l'opera di ricostruzione della millenaria storia di questo Paese e costituiscono un eccezionale ponte culturale tra Italia e Turchia. Türkiye’deki İtalyan arkeolojik araştırmaları 1957 yılında başlamıştır. Bu yayın, o zamandan beri bu topraklardaki binlerce yıllık tarihin yeniden yazılmasını sağlayan ve iki ülke arasında mükemmel bir kültürel köprü oluşturan çok sayıdaki İtalyan arkeoloji heyetine adanmıştır. 1 Saluto dell’Ambasciatore d’Italia in Turchia Luigi Mattiolo uesta pubblicazione intende rendere omaggio alla nostro Paese di proporsi come uno straordinario punto di Qprofessionalità, all’entusiasmo ed alla dedizione che gli riferimento in materia di ricerca, tutela e valorizzazione dei archeologi ed i ricercatori italiani quotidianamente beni culturali a livello globale. Si tratta infatti di un settore in profondono nella complessa attività di studio, tutela e cui l’Italia è in grado di esprimere professionalità di spicco a valorizzazione del patrimonio storico-architettonico di cui le livello scientifico-accademico e - in un ponte ideale di numerose civiltà che nel corso dei secoli si sono succedute collegamento fra passato e futuro - tecnologie, design, sistemi hanno lasciato traccia nel territorio dell’odierna Turchia. e materiali all’avanguardia. Non è un caso che siano sempre L’indagine archeologica, attraverso l’analisi di reperti e più numerose le aziende italiane specializzate che offrono testimonianze, risulta infatti un passaggio fondamentale per sistemi e servizi avanzati per il restauro, la tutela e la ricostruire l’eredità storica ed - in un’ultima analisi - l’identità valorizzazione del patrimonio archeologico ed architettonico.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Immaculate Parish 716 E
    Mary Immaculate Parish 716 E. Washington Kirksville, MO 63501 May 12, 2019 Fourth Sunday of Easter Mothers’ Day Office Hours Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.—3:00 p.m. Phone Number 660-665-2466 Office Fax 660-665-8955 Website www.miparish.org Msgr. David Cox [email protected] Mary Immaculate School Welcome to Mary Immaculate Parish! We extend a Phone Number….660-665-1006 warm welcome to all who attend our church. We hope our Hope’s Kitchen parish community will nourish your faith and that you will Phone Number….660-988-8972 share your special gifts with us. Your prayers, your presence Sacrament of Reconciliation and your talents are most welcome. If you are settling into Mary Immaculate full time, please register! Parish registra- Saturday, 4:30 p.m. and by appointment. tion packets are in a literature rack near the side entrance in Baptism church or on our website, miparish.org. Fill it out and drop Contact the Parish Center for requirements. it in the offering basket, bring it by the Parish Center, or Marriage email it to the secretary. We take this opportunity to wel- come all of you, our parishioners and visitors, to church to- Six (6) months notice required for preparation. day. We thank you for making us a part of your day! Communion to the Sick We are happy to bring Communion to those St. Rose of Lima confined to their homes. Please contact the Novinger, Mo. 63559 Parish Center. Also, please inform the (660) 488-6680 office if a parishioner is in the hospital or nursing home.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphiletos' House: Lysias I Author(S): Gareth Morgan Source: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014), Vol
    Euphiletos' House: Lysias I Author(s): Gareth Morgan Source: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014), Vol. 112 (1982), pp. 115-123 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284074 Accessed: 13-09-2018 13:27 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284074?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014) This content downloaded from 69.120.182.218 on Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:27:29 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Transactions of the American Philological Association 112 (1982) 115-123 EUPHILETOS' HOUSE: LYSIAS I GARETH MORGAN University of Texas at Austin Lysias I, On the killing of Eratosthenes, is often cited in discussions of Greek domestic architecture for the details incidentally given about the house of the defendant, Euphiletos. This paper attempts to define rather more closely than before what we know about Euphiletos' house, and to relate it to archaeological evidence on Athenian private dwellings.' We may examine the relevant passages in the order they are presented by Euphiletos: (1) fHproV .ErV O VV, w aV8pES, .
    [Show full text]
  • Anatolian Crossroads: Achaemenid Seals from Sardis and Gordion Elspeth M
    31 Anatolian Crossroads: Achaemenid Seals from Sardis and Gordion Elspeth M. Dusinberre Seals can provide a unique entry into under- in one of the so-called “Greco-Persian” styles. standing ancient societies: used by individuals They were excavated from tombs of elite or offices for ratification, identification and Sardians. (2) The seals from Gordion, by con- ornamentation, they functioned simultane- trast, come in a wide variety of shapes and ously as official insignia and indicators of materials, including a fairly large number in personal taste. (1) The differences and simi- glass. A significant number were imported larities between the Achaemenid seals found from places far to the east, west and south. at the satrapal capital of Sardis and the large They exhibit a tremendous variety in artistic but second-tier city of Gordion are therefore style and imagery. Most of them were found especially interesting. This paper considers reused in post-Achaemenid domestic and the seals from Sardis and Gordion, exploring work contexts. (3) their shapes, sizes, materials, style, iconogra- The seals from Sardis demonstrate the phy and findspots. It situates them in their cohesion of the Achaemenid elite and the over- historical, political and geographic contexts whelming adoption of Achaemenid ideology to examine the Achaemenid Empire itself and at this satrapal capital. The lack of pre-Achae- the different ways in which Achaemenid hege- menid seals from Sardis and the preponder- mony affected different types of sites. ance of high-status ones in the Achaemenid period reiterate the importance of the Seals and society in Achaemenid administration at this satrapal Achaemenid Anatolia: headquarters.
    [Show full text]