DOCSLIB.ORG

Manual of Acid in Situ Leach Uranium Mining Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manual of Acid in Situ Leach Uranium Mining Technology IAEA-TECDOC-1239 Manual of acid in situ leach uranium mining technology August 2001 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria MANUAL OF ACID IN SITU LEACH URANIUM MINING TECHNOLOGY IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-TECDOC-1239 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria August 2001 FOREWORD An important part of the IAEA programme for reactor fuels involves eliciting and circulating information on innovative uranium production technologies. As compared with conventional mining, in situ leach (ISL) technology is both innovative and relatively young. It is recognized as having economic and environmental advantages when properly employed by knowledgeable specialists to extract uranium from suitable sandstone type deposits. In recent years ISL uranium mining has been producing about 13 to 15 per cent of world output. Because of its potential for both low cost recovery and having environmental advantages, the use of the technology will very probably increase. This may occur because sandstone hosted uranium deposits amenable to ISL recovery are relatively widespread in the world. ISL technology recovers uranium using two alternative chemical leaching systems — acid and alkaline. Acid leach is the more widely employed and has historically produced a majority of the world’s ISL production. This technology, with its origins in the 1960s, was developed and employed in the former Soviet Union and the successor states, as well as in central and eastern Europe. The report describes operational practices developed under the economic systems, together with the governmental policies and programmes prevailing over this period. The United States of America is the only other country with an extended history of ISL uranium production. In the USA, both acid and alkaline leach systems were tested before alkaline technology was exclusively adopted for environmental reasons. As with all mining technology, any project must be planned, developed, operated and closed, only when appropriate consideration is made for environmental impacts. This report brings together information from several technical disciplines that are an essential part of ISL technology. They include uranium geology, geohydrology, chemistry, as well as reservoir engineering and process engineering, It is not intended as a how to do it manual. However, it does provide insights into many of the considerations related to the technical feasibility of planning, operating and closing ISL uranium mining projects. No comprehensive report exits for either acid or alkaline ISL uranium mining. Furthermore, while there is a significant amount of literature on alkaline leach systems, almost no English language literature is available for acid technology. Therefore this manual is the first report published in English providing an extensive description of acid ISL uranium mining technology. It should also be noted that much of the material may also be of value for planning or operating alkaline ISL projects. The IAEA wishes to thank the consultants who took part in the preparation of this report for their valuable contributions. The IAEA is also grateful to the Member States and individual organizations for their generous support in providing experts to assist in this work. In particular it expresses its appreciation to the staff of the All Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology for its major contribution. The IAEA officer responsible for this publication was D.H. Underhill of the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology. EDITORIAL NOTE The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND THEORY OF IN SITU LEACH (ISL) URANIUM MINING TECHNOLOGY................................................1 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 1.2. Geochemical characteristics of ISL sites...........................................................................3 1.3. Reactants — chemistry of leaching ...................................................................................5 1.3.1. General information on reactants...........................................................................5 1.3.2. Chemical reactions in sulphuric acid leaching ......................................................8 1.3.3. Chemical reactions in alkaline leaching ..............................................................10 1.3.4. Criteria for choosing leaching chemistry.............................................................11 1.4. Theoretical background of the uranium ISL process.......................................................12 1.4.1. Principal processes for ISL..................................................................................12 1.4.2. General mechanism of ISL in unconsolidated sedimentary deposits ..................13 1.5. Characteristic features of solution flow in ISL................................................................22 1.5.1. Physical properties of solutions affecting migration in the aquifer; density stratification in the aquifer ......................................................................22 1.5.2. Solution flow with pore plugging........................................................................28 1.5.3. Solution flow with gas formation........................................................................42 1.5.4. Dilution of solutions during leaching ..................................................................46 1.5.5. Lag of production solutions behind flow.............................................................49 References to Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................50 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS FOR IN SITU LEACH (ISL) MINING.................................................................51 2.1. Classification of deposits amenable to ISL mining .........................................................51 2.2. Hydrogeological conditions for ISL ................................................................................56 2.3. Influence of composition of ores and rocks on the ISL process......................................59 2.3.1. General.................................................................................................................59 2.3.2. Influence of mineral composition of ores on the ISL process .............................60 2.3.3. Effect of host rock composition on the ISL process............................................60 2.4. Uranium ores and ore-forming minerals..........................................................................63 2.5. Minerals formed during ISL and their influence on the process .....................................65 References to Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................67 CHAPTER 3. GEOLOGY OF SANDSTONE TYPE URANIUM DEPOSITS..................69 3.1. Lithology and facies of deposits. Classification by lithology and permeability of ore and host rocks...................................................................................69 3.2. Investigation of geochemical features of deposits and epigenetic alteration...................72 3.3. Study of the morphology of ore bodies and parameters of uranium mineralization .......73 3.3.1. Orebody morphology...........................................................................................73 3.3.2. Mapping uranium mineralization ........................................................................76 3.4. Study of the composition of ores and host rocks.............................................................80 3.5. Exploration for uranium deposits for ISL........................................................................86 3.5.1. Exploring and delineating uranium deposits for ISL extraction..........................86 3.5.2. Parameters for resource evaluation for ISL extraction ........................................88 3.6. Geophysical studies used in uranium ISL........................................................................91 3.6.1. General.................................................................................................................91 3.6.2. Investigations of ore and host rocks using logging methods ...............................94 3.6.3. Surveying drift, drill hole diameter and geothermal characteristics of measurements ..........................................................................94 References to Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................95 Bibliography to Chapter 3.........................................................................................................95 CHAPTER 4. HYDROGEOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF URANIUM DEPOSITS................................................................................97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium
    In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium (June 2009) l Most uranium mining in the USA and Kazakhstan is now by in situ leach methods, also known as in situ recovery (ISR). l In USA ISL is seen as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable method of mining, and Australian experience supports this. l Australia's first ISL uranium mine is Beverley, which started operation late in 2000. The proposal for Honeymoon has government approval and it is expected to be operating in 2008. Conventional mining involves removing mineralised rock (ore) from the ground, breaking it up and treating it to remove the minerals being sought. In situ leaching (ISL), also known as solution mining, or in situ recovery (ISR) in North America, involves leaving the ore where it is in the ground, and recovering the minerals from it by dissolving them and pumping the pregnant solution to the surface where the minerals can be recovered. Consequently there is little surface disturbance and no tailings or waste rock generated. However, the orebody needs to be permeable to the liquids used, and located so that they do not contaminate ground water away from the orebody. Uranium ISL uses the native groundwater in the orebody which is fortified with a complexing agent and in most cases an oxidant. It is then pumped through the underground orebody to recover the minerals in it by leaching. Once the pregnant solution is returned to the surface, the uranium is recovered in much the same way as in any other uranium plant (mill). In Australian ISL mines (Beverley and the soon to be opened Honeymoon Mine) the oxidant used is hydrogen peroxide and the complexing agent sulfuric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Extractive Metallurgy Lectures Note
    PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY B.TECH, 3RD SEMESTER LECTURES NOTE BY SAGAR NAYAK DR. KALI CHARAN SABAT DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING PARALA MAHARAJA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BERHAMPUR DISCLAIMER This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by the author for their respective teaching assignments as an additional tool for the teaching-learning process. Various sources as mentioned at the reference of the document as well as freely available material from internet were consulted for preparing this document. The ownership of the information lies with the respective author or institutions. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the faculty is not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The committee faculty members make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. BPUT SYLLABUS PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY (3-1-0) MODULE I (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Pyro metallurgy: Calcination and roasting, sintering, smelting, converting, reduction, smelting-reduction, Metallothermic and hydrogen reduction; distillation and other physical and chemical refining methods: Fire refining, Zone refining, Liquation and Cupellation. Small problems related to pyro metallurgy. MODULE II (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Hydrometallurgy: Leaching practice: In situ leaching, Dump and heap leaching, Percolation leaching, Agitation leaching, Purification of leach liquor, Kinetics of Leaching; Bio- leaching: Recovery of metals from Leach liquor by Solvent Extraction, Ion exchange , Precipitation and Cementation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Fluid–Rock Interactions and Lixiviant/Oxidant Behaviour for the In-Situ Recovery of Metals from Deep Ore Bodies
    School of Earth and Planetary Science Department of Applied Geology Understanding Fluid–Rock Interactions and Lixiviant/Oxidant Behaviour for the In-situ Recovery of Metals from Deep Ore Bodies Tania Marcela Hidalgo Rosero This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University February 2020 1 Declaration __________________________________________________________________________ Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief, I declare that this work of thesis contains no material published by any other person, except where due acknowledgements have been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Tania Marcela Hidalgo Rosero Date: 28/01/2020 2 Abstract __________________________________________________________________________ Abstract In-situ recovery (ISR) processing has been recognised as a possible alternative to open- pit mining, especially for low-grade resources. In ISR, the fluid–rock interaction between the target ore and the lixiviant results in valuable- (and gangue-) metal dissolution. This interaction is achieved by the injection and recovery of fluid by means of strategically positioned wells. Although the application of ISR has become more common (ISR remains the preferential processing technique for uranium and has been applied in pilot programs for treating oxide zones in copper deposits), its application to hard-rock refractory and low-grade copper-sulfide deposits is still under development. This research is focused on the possible application of ISR to primary copper sulfides usually found as deep ores. Lixiviant/oxidant selection is an important aspect to consider during planning and operation in the ISR of copper-sulfide ores.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment and Microscopy of Gold
    TREATMENT AND MICROSCOPY OF GOLD AND BASE METAL ORES. (Script with Sketches & Tables) Short Course by R. W. Lehne April 2006 www.isogyre.com Geneva University, Department of Mineralogy CONTENTS (Script) page 1. Gold ores and their metallurgical treatment 2 1.1 Gravity processes 2 1.2 Amalgamation 2 1.3 Flotation and subsequent processes 2 1.4 Leaching processes 3 1.5 Gold extraction processes 4 1.6 Cyanide leaching vs. thio-compound leaching 5 2. Microscopy of gold ores and treatment products 5 2.1 Tasks and problems of microscopical investigations 5 2.2 Microscopy of selected gold ores and products 6 (practical exercises) 3. Base metal ores and their beneficiation 7 3.1 Flotation 7 3.2 Development of the flotation process 7 3.3 Principles and mechanisms of flotation 7 3.4 Column flotation 9 3.5 Hydrometallurgy 10 4. Microscopy of base metal ores and milling products 10 4.1 Specific tasks of microscopical investigations 11 4.2 Microscopy of selected base metal ores and milling products 13 (practical exercises) 5. Selected bibliography 14 (Sketches & Tables) Different ways of gold concentration 15 Gravity concentration of gold (Agricola) 16 Gravity concentration of gold (“Long Tom”) 17 Shaking table 18 Humphreys spiral concentrator 19 Amalgamating mills (Mexican “arrastra”, Chilean “trapiche”) 20 Pressure oxidation flowsheet 21 Chemical reactions of gold leaching and cementation 22 Cyanide solubilities of selected minerals 23 Heap leaching flowsheet 24 Carbon in pulp process 25 Complexing of gold by thio-compounds 26 Relation gold content / amount of particles in polished section 27 www.isogyre.com Economically important copper minerals 28 Common zinc minerals 29 Selection of flotation reagents 30 Design and function of a flotation cell 31 Column cell flotation 32 Flowsheet of a simple flotation process 33 Flowsheet of a selective Pb-Zn flotation 34 Locking textures 35 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Description of Mineral Processing Sectors And
    V. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS As shown in Exhibit 5-1, EPA determined that 48 commodity sectors generated a total of 527 waste streams that could be classified as either extraction/beneficiation or mineral processing wastes. After careful review, EPA determined that 41 com modity sectors generated a total of 354 waste streams that could be designated as mineral processing wastes. Exhibit 5-2 presents the 354 mineral processing wastes by commodity sector. Of these 354 waste streams, EPA has sufficient information (based on either analytical test data or engineering judgment) to determine that 148 waste streams are potentially RCRA hazardous wastes because they may exhibit one or more of the RCRA hazardous characteristics: toxicity, ignitability, corro sivity, or reactivity. Exhibit 5-3 presents the 148 RCRA hazardous mineral processing wastes that will be subject to the Land Disposal Restrictions. Exhibit 5-4 identifies the mineral processing commodity sectors that generate RCRA hazardous mineral processing wastes that are likely to be subject to the Land D isposal Restrictions. Exhibit 5-4 also summarizes the total number of hazardous waste streams by sector and the estimated total volume of hazardous wastes generated annually. At this time, however, EPA has insufficient information to determine whether the following nine sectors also generate wastes that could be classified as mineral processing wastes: Bromine, Gemstones, Iodine, Lithium, Lithium Carbonate, Soda Ash, Sodium Sulfate, and Strontium.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Extraction from Paleochannel Ores Using an Aerated Alkaline Glycine Lixiviant for Consideration in Heap and In-Situ Leaching Applications E.A
    Gold extraction from paleochannel ores using an aerated alkaline glycine lixiviant for consideration in heap and in-situ leaching applications E.A. Orabya,c, J.J. Eksteena*, A. Karrechb, M. Attarb aFaculty of Science and Engineering, Western Australian School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia bDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Australia c Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Egypt *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The decreasing grades of some gold deposits combined with the increasing depths, difficult surface topography, socioeconomic and geopolitical pressures often make the processing of such deposits infeasible by conventional mining, comminution and leaching technologies. To overcome these problems, the application of in-place, in-situ, and heap leaching often represent an optimal solution that minimises the capital and operating costs associated with mining and processing operations. Non- toxic, low cost lixiviants that are stable over an extended range of pH and Eh are required to provide any practical solution to ISL. Since ISL has the inherent benefit of increased natural rock temperature and pressure, glycine-based systems can be considered to extract valuable metals. Based on earlier studies on glycine leaching of pure gold foil, this research shows that Western Australian paleochannel ores are amenable to glycine-based ISL, at elevated alkalinity. The effects of pH, temperature, free glycine, ferric ions, sodium chloride and solids percentages on the kinetics of gold extraction were assessed. More than 85% of the gold can be extracted from ore with solutions containing 15 g/L glycine at pH 12.5 in 336 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-1559, Leaching
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metallurgy of Antimony
    Chemie der Erde 72 (2012) S4, 3–8 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Chemie der Erde journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/chemer The metallurgy of antimony Corby G. Anderson ∗ Kroll Institute for Extractive Metallurgy, George S. Ansell Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, United States article info abstract Article history: Globally, the primary production of antimony is now isolated to a few countries and is dominated by Received 4 October 2011 China. As such it is currently deemed a critical and strategic material for modern society. The metallurgical Accepted 10 April 2012 principles utilized in antimony production are wide ranging. This paper will outline the mineral pro- cessing, pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical and electrometallurgical concepts used in the industrial Keywords: primary production of antimony. As well an overview of the occurrence, reserves, end uses, production, Antimony and quality will be provided. Stibnite © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Tetrahedrite Pyrometallurgy Hydrometallurgy Electrometallurgy Mineral processing Extractive metallurgy Production 1. Background bullets and armory. The start of mass production of automobiles gave a further boost to antimony, as it is a major constituent of Antimony is a silvery, white, brittle, crystalline solid that lead-acid batteries. The major use for antimony is now as a trioxide exhibits poor conductivity of electricity and heat. It has an atomic for flame-retardants. number of 51, an atomic weight of 122 and a density of 6.697 kg/m3 ◦ ◦ at 26 C. Antimony metal, also known as ‘regulus’, melts at 630 C 2. Occurrence and mineralogy and boils at 1380 ◦C.
    [Show full text]
  • Extractive Metallurgy of Copper This Page Intentionally Left Blank Extractive Metallurgy of Copper
    Extractive Metallurgy of Copper This page intentionally left blank Extractive Metallurgy of Copper Mark E. Schlesinger Matthew J. King Kathryn C. Sole William G. Davenport AMSTERDAM l BOSTON l HEIDELBERG l LONDON NEW YORK l OXFORD l PARIS l SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO l SINGAPORE l SYDNEY l TOKYO Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands First edition 1976 Second edition 1980 Third edition 1994 Fourth edition 2002 Fifth Edition 2011 Copyright Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: permissions@ elsevier.com. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN: 978-0-08-096789-9 For information on all Elsevier publications visit our web site at elsevierdirect.com Printed and bound in Great Britain 11 12 13 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 Photo credits: Secondary cover photograph shows anode casting furnace at Palabora Mining Company, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Technospheric Mining of Rare Earth Elements from Bauxite
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Technospheric Mining of Rare Earth Elements from Bauxite Residue (Red Mud): Process Optimization, Received: 3 May 2017 Accepted: 3 October 2017 Kinetic Investigation, and Published: xx xx xxxx Microwave Pretreatment Sable Reid1, Jason Tam2, Mingfan Yang1 & Gisele Azimi 1,2 Some rare earth elements (REEs) are classifed under critical materials, i.e., essential in use and subject to supply risk, due to their increasing demand, monopolistic supply, and environmentally unsustainable and expensive mining practices. To tackle the REE supply challenge, new initiatives have been started focusing on their extraction from alternative secondary resources. This study puts the emphasis on technospheric mining of REEs from bauxite residue (red mud) produced by the aluminum industry. Characterization results showed the bauxite residue sample contains about 0.03 wt% REEs. Systematic leaching experiments showed that concentrated HNO3 is the most efective lixiviant. However, because of the process complexities, H2SO4 was selected as the lixiviant. To further enhance the leaching efciency, a novel process based on microwave pretreatment was employed. Results indicated that microwave pretreatment creates cracks and pores in the particles, enabling the lixiviant to difuse further into the particles, bringing more REEs into solution, yielding of 64.2% and 78.7% for Sc and Nd, respectively, which are higher than the maximum obtained when HNO3 was used. This novel process of “H2SO4 leaching-coupled with-microwave pretreatment” proves to be a promising technique that can help realize the technological potential of REE recovery from secondary resources, particularly bauxite residue. Rare earth elements (REEs) have unique physicochemical properties that make them indispensable in many emerging critical and green innovations.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,097,227 B2 Hacklet Al
    USO0809.7227B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,097,227 B2 Hacklet al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 17, 2012 (54) METHOD FOR THOSULFATE LEACHING 4,721,526 A 1/1988 Elmore et al. OF PRECIOUS METAL-CONTAINING 4,723,998 A 2, 1988 O’Neil 4,738,718 A 4, 1988 Bakshani et al. MATERLALS 4,740,243 A 4, 1988 Krebs-Yuillet al. 4,765,827 A 8/1988 Clough et al. (75) Inventors: Ralph Peter Hackl, Vancouver (CA); 4,778,519 A 10, 1988 Pesic Jinxing Ji, Burnaby (CA); Paul George 4,801,329 A 1/1989 Clough et al. 4,816,234 A 3, 1989 Brison et al. West-Sells, Vancouver (CA) 4,816,235 A 3, 1989 Pesic 4.902,345 A 2f1990 Ball et al. (73) Assignee: Placer Dome Technical Services 4,913,730 A 4, 1990 Deschenes et al. Limited, Vancouver (CA) 4,923,510 A 5/1990 Ramadorai et al. 4,925.485 A 5, 1990 Schulze (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,980,134 A 12, 1990 Butler 5,051,128 A 9, 1991 Kubo patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,071.477 A 12/1991 Thomas et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,114,687 A 5/1992 Han et al. 5,127.942 A 7/1992 Brierley et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/683,967 5,147,617 A 9, 1992 Touro et al. 5,147,618 A 9, 1992 Touro et al. (22) Filed: Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ
    GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IN-SITU LEACH URANIUM MILLING FACILITIES SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 2008 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland 1. INTRODUCTION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) expects to receive a number of new license applications for uranium milling at sites in the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, Wyoming and New Mexico over the next several years. NRC anticipates that most of these potential license applications will involve uranium milling facilities that would use the in-situ leach (ISL) process. Because there are environmental issues common to ISL milling facilities, NRC has prepared a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the construction, operation, aquifer restoration, and decommissioning at future ISL milling facilities in specific regions of interest within these four western states, where NRC is the licensing authority for uranium milling. In the ISL process, a leaching agent, such as oxygen with sodium bicarbonate, is added to native ground water for injection through wells into the subsurface ore body to dissolve the uranium. The leach solution, containing the dissolved uranium, is pumped back to the surface and sent to a processing plant, where ion exchange is used to separate the uranium from the solution. The underground leaching of the uranium also frees other metals and minerals from the host rock. Operators of ISL facilities are required to restore the ground water affected by the leaching operations. The milling process concentrates the recovered uranium into the product known as "yellowcake" (U3O8). This yellowcake is then shipped to uranium conversion facilities for further processing in the overall uranium fuel cycle.
    [Show full text]