DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Ideas for the Future of Europe in the Context of Germany's EU Council Presidency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Ideas for the Future of Europe in the Context of Germany's EU Council Presidency Green Ideas for the Future of Europe In the Context of Germany's EU Council Presidency Published by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union, Brussels ' ' Green Ideas for the Future of Europe In the Context of Germany's EU Council Presidency Published by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union, Brussels Published by: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union, Rue du Luxembourg 47-51, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Contact: Zora Siebert, Head of EU Policy Programme, [email protected] Place of publication: https://eu.boell.org/, Brussels December 2020 Contributors: Dr. Jens Althoff, Katrin Altmeyer, Rasmus Andresen, Dr. Annegret Bendiek, Marc Berthold, Michael Bloss, Dr. Franziska Brantner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Anna Cavazzini, Dr. Christine Chemnitz, Florian Christl, Pieter de Pous, Karima Delli, Anna Depar- nay-Grunenberg, Bas Eickhout, Gisela Erler, Romeo Franz, Daniel Freund, Alexandra Geese, Sven Giegold, Céline Göhlich, Jörg Haas, Henrike Hahn, Martin Häusling, Heidi Hautala, Bastian Hermisson, Dr. Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, Dr. Cornelia Hoffmann, Benedek Jávor, Dr. Ines Kappert, Walter Kaufmann, Martin Keim, Ska Keller, Dr. Lina Khatib, Alice Kuhnke, Dr. Sergey Lagodinsky, Joan Lanfranco, Katrin Langensiepen, Josephine Liebl, Hannes Lorenzen, Cornelia Maarfield, Erik Marquardt, Joanna Maycock, Alfonso Medinilla, Diego Naranjo, Dr. Hannah Neumann, Niklas Nienaß, Dr. Janka Oertel, Jutta Paulus, Michael Peters, Dr. Christine Pütz, Terry Reintke, Gert Röhrborn, Klaus Röhrig, Dr. Bente Scheller, Anna Schwarz, Dr. Daniela Schwarzer, Molly Scott Cato, Zora Siebert, Claudia Simons, Johanna Maria Stolarek, Patrick ten Brink, Petar Todorov, William Todts, Lisa Tostado, Malgorzata Tracz, Eva van de Rakt, Viola von Cramon, Richard Youngs, Clara Zeeh, Dr. Fabian Zuleeg. More publications: https://eu.boell.org/publications ISBN 978-9-46400744-2 D/2020/11.850/4 Table of Contents Foreword – Taking stock of Germany's EU Council Presidency 2020 9 1. Introduction – European Responses to Multiple Crises 15 2. The European Green Deal 2.1. Reform of EU Agriculture Policy and Biodiversity Protection 27 2.2. The European Green Deal and Digitalisation 35 2.3. The European Green Deal and the Future of Mobility 45 2.4. The European Green Deal and Gender Diversity 55 2.5. The Social Dimension of the European Green Deal 63 2.6.The European Green Deal and the Multiannual Financial Framework 71 2.7. Facing the Climate Crisis 81 3. The Future of the EU 3.1. Safeguarding the Rule of Law in EU Member States 89 3.2. Conference on the Future of Europe 99 3.3. The EU's Neighbourhood and Enlargement Policy 109 3.4. Post-Brexit: What Future for the EU-UK Relationship? 117 3.5. The EU's Digital Policy 125 4. The EU's Role in the World 4.1. EU-Africa: A Close and Intense Relationship 133 4.2. Between Cooperation and Systemic Rivalry: The EU-China Relationship 141 4.3. EU Trade Policy: More Transparency, Environmental and Climate Protection! 149 4.4. The EU Migration Policy: More Solidarity Is Needed! 157 4.5. The EU Must Speak With One Voice: Its Role in the Middle East 165 4.6. Democracy Support Outside the EU 173 4.7. The Future of Multilateralism 181 5. Policy Recommendations – Key Green Ideas for the Future of Europe 189 References 195 8 Foreword – Taking stock of Germany's EU Council Presidency 2020 Germany’s EU Council Presidency faced major challenges given the impacts of the Co- vid-19 pandemic. The pandemic overwhelmed healthcare systems and plunged the world into a deep economic crisis. Ill-coordinated measures and reactions, especially at the be- ginning of the year, have endangered European cohesion, with the pandemic showing us how fragile the EU is. The German EU Council Presidency had to shift from its original working programme to encouraging Member States to work together in solidarity and to find common ways out of the crisis. Its main success has been the adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021-2027 (MFF) and the recovery instrument “Next Generation EU” (NGEU) in order to support Member States hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. The moderation of the process has not been an easy task at all. During the negotiations, many fault lines between the governments of the 27 Member States became visible and had to be addressed. It me- rits respect that a package of 1.8 trillion euros was adopted. Without the joint proposal for an EU recovery instrument, presented by Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel in May 2020, it would have almost certainly been impossible to reach an agreement. The fact that the European Commission, in order to finance the recovery, will borrow from the international capital markets on behalf of the EU (joint debts) and redistribute the money between the Member States is a historic step and would have been unimaginable prior to the pandemic. It has to be stressed that the role of the European Parliament was extremely important in preventing attempts by the European Council to undermine the European Commission’s proposals, especially regarding tackling the climate crisis, future-oriented EU funding programmes and safeguarding the rule of law in the EU. After months of negotiations, the European Commission, the Council and the European Parliament agreed on the introduction of a rule of law conditionality. For the first time in the history of the EU, the disbursement of EU funds is linked to compliance with the rule of law, with the aim of combating corruption and illiberal attacks on democracy and fundamental values. The conditionality mechanism, however, is not a panacea. Unfortu- nately, the Hungarian and Polish governments managed to weaken the original proposal of the European Commission by threatening to veto the MFF and NGEU. Nevertheless, it has to be emphasised that Hungary and Poland were not able to stop the conditiona- lity as such, and despite all justified criticism, the rule of law conditionality is a step in the right direction. It now has to be ensured that the compromise reached during the December 2020 Summit of the European Council will not result in the conditionality’s delayed implementation. In hindsight, the German government disappointed by not de- Foreword – Taking stock of Germany's EU Council Presidency 2020 9 monstrating leadership on the rule of law, despite declaring this topic a priority back in July 2020. The inaction of the German government during its EU Council Presidency in ongoing Article 7 proceedings against Poland and Hungary was deplorable. While Germany’s EU Council Presidency has officially always spoken in favour of the European Green Deal (EGD), a more detailed analysis shows that it has also stepped on the breaks regarding more ambitious, concrete policy proposals. During its first year, the EGD consisted mainly of non-legislative strategies, but it also included proposals for some binding measures, such as the Climate Law and the Just Transition Fund. The most prominent feature of the former is the updated greenhouse gas emissions reduction tar- get by 2030: from -40 to at least -55 percent. Yet, natural gas was embraced as a tran- sition fuel and Europe’s land use and forests were allowed to count toward the emissions reductions. A more progressive move was the exclusion of monies for fossil gas within the Just Transition Fund, which aims at providing the most affected regions with financi- al and technical assistance. Germany‘s official support for the EU Biodiversity Strategy has unfortunately not been followed by coherent actions. The need for more funding to protect and restore eco- systems, as well as a substantial restructuring of payments to farmers, have not been reflected in the German EU Council Presidency. One of the most disappointing aspects is the reform of the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), accounting for about one third of the EU budget. Loopholes for the already underfunded eco-schemes, disregard for the Farm-to-Fork and Biodiversity Strategy, and a big majority of the funding still paid per hectare with barely any strings attached, make the agreement between the Council and the European Parliament incompatible with the EGD. The MFF proposals are respecta- ble with regard to an increased spending target on climate, a first ever spending target on biodiversity, and own resources derived from environmental measures, such as a tax on unrecycled plastic, an extension of the EU‘s Emission Trading System (ETS) and a carbon border adjustment mechanism. Nevertheless, this success can be attributed to efforts stemming from the European Parliament rather than the German EU Council Presidency. The long-awaited New EU Pact on Migration and Asylum was published in September 2020. In practice, the proposal on the table does not mean an end to the dysfunctional Dublin regulation, but a continuation, and even an intensification, of it. It keeps a major focus on the externalisation of the EU’s responsibilities and external borders manage- ment. Since 2015, the question of how to organise a fair distribution of asylum seekers within the EU has caused serious conflicts. The European Commission’s vision of “fle- xible solidarity”, and especially its concept of the so-called “return sponsorships”, are unfortunately an absolute boon for governments that have been trying to block all soli- darity-based approaches for years, and who refuse to receive and welcome any refugees at all. Additionally, the European Commission is not planning to resume EU sea rescue operations in the Mediterranean. The German EU Council Presidency’s plan to achieve an agreement between all Member States on the Pact’s major lines by the end of 2020 failed. Foreword – Taking stock of Germany's EU Council Presidency 2020 10 After the US Elections in November 2020, EU institutions are hoping for a fresh start to transatlantic relations based on trust and predictability. Germany’s EU Council Pre- sidency, however, did not succeed in advancing the internal discussions on what future role the EU would like to play in order to strengthen multilateral cooperation, structu- res and organisations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The New European Parliament: Post-Election Analysis
    Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Europäische Union Rue du Luxembourg,47- 51 - 1050 Brussels, Belgium T+32 2 743 41 00 E [email protected] I eu.boell.org SAVE THE DATE The New European Parliament: Post-Election Analysis From 23 to 26 May, EU citizens will be called to the polls to elect a new European Parliament. The elections will challenge the two largest political groups, as they will most probably face serious losses. The European People's Party (EPP) and the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) are unlikely to hold on to all of their mandates. Far-right and anti-estab- lishment parties could gain more seats than in 2014. Even though the ‘worst case’ scenario of an anti-EU majority is unlikely, the project of European integration might lose momentum as a destructive minority in the European Parliament is likely to grow. On the other hand, smaller groups such as the Liberals and Greens could play a new role in forming majorities in the newly elected Parliament. During the debate, we will examine the election results and analyse voting behaviour in individ- ual EU member states. What will the new European Parliament’s composition look like? What are the implications for coalition-building, the interaction between the EU institutions and the future of the European project? Date Tuesday, 29 May 2019 Time 10 :00 – 12 :00 Venue Atelier29, Rue Jacques de Lalaing 29, 1000 Brussels (Mezzanine) Programme 09:30 – 10:00 Registration & coffee 10:00 – 10:15 Welcome remarks by Eva van de Rakt, Head of Office, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement
    Brussels, Wednesday 26th of May To: Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Mr Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market Mr Frans Timmermans, European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal We urge the European Commission to keep its promises and propose a regulatory measure addressing the durability and repairability of printers as well as the reusability of cartridges as part of the forthcoming Circular Electronics Initiative. And we ask that the Commission rejects the proposed voluntary agreement drafted by manufacturers. The Commission's flagship Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020, has set out to address the entire life cycle of products and tackle their premature obsolescence notably by promoting the right to repair for ICT products. In addition to mobile phones, laptops and tablets, the Plan has rightfully identified printers as a particularly wasteful product category, and has included a commitment to tackle them by means of a dedicated regulatory instrument “unless the sector reaches an ambitious voluntary agreement” by September 2020. Nearly one year later, the discussions on the voluntary agreement have not yielded any tangible results. Voluntary approaches clearly do not work. We need strong regulatory action now. We are extremely concerned by this situation. Not only because of the negative impacts of short-lived printers on the environment and on consumers but also because we are witnessing promises made being walked back on. Printers are one of the most iconic examples of premature obsolescence. Our analysis of printers in use today suggests that over 80% of them have been in use for less than 3 years, and only about 4% have been in use for 5 years or longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Local Benefits of Europe
    Local Benefits of Europe 1 European Green Party Rue Wiertz 31, 1050 Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Funded by the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author. Printed in Brussels, Belgium on recycled paper Designed by Mijuro © 2018 DEAR FRIENDS European politics have a signifi cant Evelyne Huytebroeck influence on the lives of people at the (Member of the EGP Committee) local level. In many EU Member States, the local elections are held simulta- neously with the European elections providing a huge opportunity to link the two election campaigns. Against this background, we would like to provide you with some practical background material and answer your questions on how European decisions in various policy areas influence your municipality by means of this booklet ‘Local Benefi ts of Europe’. This booklet is based on a work that was done by the German Greens lead by Anna Cavazzini and Reinhard Bütikofer. The information can also help you prepare for your local election programmes or campaigns. We place particular emphasis on how the people in your community benefi t practically from Europe, ranging from (Secretary General EGP) environmental protection to structural Mar Garcia policy, and what the Greens in Europe have achieved for European communi- ties. If you need more information on a spe- cifi c topic - no problem: in each chapter, you will fi nd a contact person who has contributed to this handbook and can answer your questions. We hope that this handbook will help you to prepare for the upcoming Euro- pean and local elections. Best regards 1. How do cities and municipalities benefi t from Europe? 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • E-9-2021-000946 EN.Pdf
    Question for written answer E-000946/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Radka Maxová (Renew), Ondřej Kovařík (Renew), Markéta Gregorová (Verts/ALE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Juozas Olekas (S&D), Tomasz Frankowski (PPE), Luděk Niedermayer (PPE), Andrzej Halicki (PPE), Liudas Mažylis (PPE), Tomáš Zdechovský (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Bronis Ropė (Verts/ALE), Ondřej Knotek (Renew), Tineke Strik (Verts/ALE), Nils Torvalds (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Maria Arena (S&D), Krzysztof Hetman (PPE), Vlad-Marius Botoş (Renew), Rasa Juknevičienė (PPE), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Erik Marquardt (Verts/ALE), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Michaela Šojdrová (PPE), Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel (Verts/ALE), Michael Bloss (Verts/ALE), Malik Azmani (Renew), Hildegard Bentele (PPE), Eugen Jurzyca (ECR) Subject: Support for students from Belarus to study at universities in the EU In Belarus, thousands are struggling for democracy, as violent protests continue to rage. In a desperate attempt to curb the young protesters’ activities, Lukashenko called for those publicly supporting the protests to be dismissed from their studies and jobs. The EU needs to act fast. Those who fight for democratic values cannot be punished by stripping them of their right to education, and drafting them for military service. Therefore, we welcome the EU4Belarus programme pledging to contribute EUR 24 million to reinforcing resilience and empowering civil society in Belarus, of which EUR 8 million will go to scholarships and stipends for study in the EU. Unfortunately, the basis for the distribution of these funds is still unknown, so the money is still waiting to be allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbandsnachrichten 1/2020
    VERBANDSNACHRICHTEN AUSGABE 1 | 2020 AUS DEM HAMBURGER VERBAND 54. Steuerberaterball im Hotel Atlantic, S. 6 BERUFSAUSÜBUNG Musterverfahrensdokumentation Mobiles Scannen, S. 29 BERUFSRECHT Anpassungen im Berufsrecht der Steuerberater, S. 38 Das Magazin des Steuerberaterverbandes Hamburg Was Steuerberater heute so im Kopf haben? CHIPS Denn mit Software-Lösungen von Agenda geht die tägliche Arbeit ganz leicht von der Hand. So haben Sie vor allem eines im Kopf: den Erfolg Ihrer Mandanten. Zum Beispiel den des IT-Start-ups und wie es am besten von ö entlichen Fördergeldern pro tiert. agenda-steuerberater.de 11:46:10 STEUERBERATERVERBAND HAMBURG INHALTSVERZEICHNIS AUS DEM HAMBURGER VERBAND Schadenersatz wegen verzögerter Mandatsbearbeitung? 42 54. Steuerberaterball im Hotel Atlantic 6 Beurteilung der SV-Pflicht von Geschäftsführern durch StB 42 Der Verband spendet Erlös der Steuerberaterball-Tombola 11 Übermittlung gemeinsamer Steuererklärungen bei fehlender Zustimmung eines Ehegatten Bezirksgruppen stellen sich vor – Bezirksgruppe Ost 12 42 Abrechnungsfragen bei interdisziplinären Kanzleien Gehen Sie am 16. August 2020 an den Start der 46 25. EuroEyes Cyclassics im Team „Steuerberaterverband HH“ 13 STEUERRECHT Einladung zur 17. Norddeutschen Steuer-Open 2020 13 Steuerfreie Veräußerung von Kapitallebensversicherungen 56. Steuerrechtliches Seminar Westerland auf dem Zweitmarkt 49 07. bis 14. September 2020 14 Untergang von Gewerbeverlusten bei Betriebsverpachtung 49 Vom Vorstand und der Geschäftsführung wahrgenommene Finanzgericht Hamburg Termine
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary Covering the Period of January to December 2020
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS, AND INTERSEX PEOPLE IN HUNGARY COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2020 Hungary ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES EDUCATION In December, the Equal Treatment Authority (ETA) found that On 15 December, parliament amended the Fundamental Law a hotel discriminated when refusing to host an event of a local to further entrench the anti-trans framework by establishing NGO that organised Pécs Pride. children’s “right” to identify with their birth sex, to be ‘protected’ from interventions to change it, and to be educated according to Christian values. ASYLUM On 16 July, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the Gergely Gulyás, Minister of the Prime Minister said educators Rana v. Hungary case that an Iranian trans refugee had the who use ‘Wonderland is for Everyone’ (see Bias-motivated right to legal gender recognition. The government paid the speech and violence) may face criminal charges. Two local compensation, but the man’s documents have still not been governments banned the book in kindergartens, and a third one changed. banned LGBTQ propaganda in all institutions. BIAS-MOTIVATED SPEECH AND VIOLENCE EMPLOYMENT In August, PM Viktor Orbán called on neighbouring governments Háttér Society prepared a detailed practical guide to help to stand up for Christian values, warning against Western employers navigate difficulties arising from the ban of legal efforts to “experiment with a godless cosmos, rainbow families, gender recognition in an employment context. migration and open societies”. A coalition of NGOs issued a guide for employers on the COVID-19 Several local governments raised the rainbow flag during the pandemic’s impact on vulnerable employees, including LGBTQI Pride Festival, some of which were forcibly removed or burned by people.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0271/2021 12.5.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP)) Reinhard Bütikofer, Markéta Gregorová, Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel, Sara Matthieu, Francisco Guerreiro, Alice Kuhnke, Bas Eickhout, Pär Holmgren, Jakop G. Dalunde, Anna Cavazzini, Yannick Jadot, Saskia Bricmont on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group RE\1231430EN.docx PE692.538v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0271/2021 European Parliament resolution on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU- China relations, in particular those of 21 January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong1 and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region2 (XUAR), – having regard to its previous recommendations relating to Hong Kong, in particular that of 13 December 2017 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on Hong Kong, 20 years after handover3, – having regard to the statement by leading MEPs following the decision by Chinese authorities to sanction
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation
    GREEN YOUTH FOR A GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress Berlin, 8th to 14th of August 2010 Dear readers! 3 A short history of the Global Young Greens 4 HISTORY 2nd Congress 8 programmE 9 Regional Meetings 10 Workshops 12 the perspectives of small content scale farming and the agricultural issues 16 Green New Deal – A Concept for a Global Economic Change? 17 Impressions 18 General Assembly of GYG Congress Berlin 2010 20 Summary of our Structure Reform 21 GYG in Action 22 Passed Proposals 23 Statements 25 Participants 26 Introduction of the new Steering Committee 28 Plans 32 THANK-YOU‘S 30 IMPRINT 31 2 global young greens—Congress 2010 Dear readers! We proudly present to you the documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress held in Berlin from 8th to 14th of August 2010! More than 100 participants from over 50 countries spent five days of discussing as well as exchanging opinions and experiences from their homecountries in order to get closer together and fight with “Youth Power for a Global Green Change“. Workshops, fishbowl discussions and a world café were organised as parts of the congress. The debated topics were endless – reaching from economics and gender issues to social justice, peace and conflicts and - of course - climate change. After three days of debating, two days of General Assem- bly followed. In this, new structures were adopted as well as several topical proposals to form a wider political platform. With this documentation, we are trying to show what the congress was about and what was behind.
    [Show full text]