DOCSLIB.ORG

Austrailia Railroad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Austrailia Railroad Australia: Railroad Equipment Australia: Railroad Equipment Page 1 of 6 John Kanawati 08/200 9 Summary The Australian railroad industry generates about US$ 5 billion in goods and services, or 1.7 percent of the nation’s total output. The market for railroad equipment is valued at US$ 915 million and will grow by five percent annually over the next three years. Despite the world economic crises, demand for railroad technology is being fueled by Australia’s buoyant minerals industry, an industry structure which encourages investment by ma jor operators, and the Federal Government’s economic stimulus plan. Rail reform has increased the number of private rail operators from ten in the 1990s to thirty today . C ontracting out has created new work for rail maintenance and engineering firms. U. S. -based consortia have been among the successful bidders for government -owned rail assets and t he presence of more private rail operators has increased pressure to upgrade and refurbish existing state -owned and managed infrastructure. Following the priva tization of many federal and state gove rnment rail assets between 1995 and 2002, the industry has recently emerged from a period of inevitable rationalization. Demand for equipment and technology is enjoying considerable growth. Market Demand With the completion of the Alice Springs to Darwin Railway, Australia has approximately 37,000 route kilomet er s of standard, broad , and narrow track , compared with 34,480 km in 1990 . Annual engineering construction work is in the vicinity of US$1,800 million. This represents 20 percent of the value of expenditure on roads and bridges. Rail infrastruct ure can be divided into the following categories : - Mining Rail roads include i ron ore rail roads in the Pilbara Region of W estern Australia and coal rail roads in Qu eensland . The remaining significant mining rail road is the Hunter Valley coal lines in New S outh Wales. - The Defined Interstate Rail Network (DIRN) includes over 8000 km of standard gauge track joining the mainland capital cities and their ports with connecting lines to Whyalla, Port Kembla and Newcastle . - Urban Rail roads are standard among the five largest capital cities of Australia . Perth is the only city to have significantly extended its network recently with new lines . There are two key players in the rail transport industry, QR (37 percent market share) and Pacific National (27 percent ma rket share), which both represent almost two thirds of inter -modal rail freight business. There are other major participants in the bulk freight market – most operate on the private rail lines managed by major mining companies. In road transport, the la rgest two firms, Toll and Linfox, have 10 percent o f the road freight market but the majority of participants are single person operators. This reflects the low barriers to entry of road freight . The cost of fuel represent s 50 percent o f the total cost st ructure for road transport and 25 percent for rail transport. As the cost of fuel continues to rise, the railroad sector is likely to win more business from road. Let us help you export. export. gov The U.S. Commercial Service — Your global business partner. 800 -USA -TRADE Australia: Railroad Equipment Page 2 of 6 According to a 2008 Australasian Railway Association (ARA) report, non -urban passenger and freight sectors operated 1,829 locomotives and 39,169 wagons in 2007. A pproximately 50 percent of the locomotive fleet was less than 17 years old while 50 percent of the wagon fleet was less than 25 years old. Since the beginning of 2008, Australian rail operators purchased 30 new diesel electric locomotives – three times more than they purchased between 1997 and 2007. The growth of Queensland’s coal industry and Pacific National’s entry into Qu eensland’s coal haulage market have helped fuel n ew locomoti ve orders . Pacific National is Australia’s largest private rail freight business. In March 2009, the Australian Government announced a US $1.6 billion investment in rail infrastructure improvements on the National Land Transport Network and the interstate rail network . The Government will provide US$420 million for rail projects, and US$570 million to the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) to further develop the Melbourne -Sydney -Brisbane rail corridor. A public company (although its shares are who lly owned by the Australian Government), ARTC has also committed its own funds toward the project. The proposal is expected to shift an extra 300,000 tons of freight per year by rail instead of road . The majority of interstate goods continue to be transpo rted via road in Australia. Road funding remains predominant in both state and federal government budgets but invest ment in off -track infrastructure and new forms of rolling stock have seen rail’s share of freight transport grow in recent years. Market Data Table 1: MARKET FOR RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (US DOLLARS MILLIONS) 200 7 200 8 200 9 Total Market Size 648.5 871.6 914.9 Total Local Production 621.5 835.4 876.9 Total Exports 80.8 108.6 114.0 Total Imports 107.8 144.8 152 .0 Imports from the U.S. 40.9 55.0 57.8 The above figures are unofficial estimates. Best Prospects Distributors and rail operators have demonstrated an openness to reviewing technology designed to increase the capacity and efficiency of bulk freight, inter -modal freigh t, and urban -passenger traffic. Distributors of railroad equipment have expressed an interest in contacting U.S. manufacturers of: - Resurfacing and track maintenance equipment . - Track construction and laying equipment . - Wayside monitoring equipment . - Rolling stock accessories and parts . - Workshop systems . - Measurement technology . - Safety equipment . - Railroad t ools . Existing research projects within the industry also suggest opportunities in: Let us help you export. export. gov The U.S. Commercial Service — Your global business partner. 800 -USA -TRADE Australia: Railroad Equipment Page 3 of 6 - Technology designed to improve the railroad industry’s environmental p erformance, particular ly in the area of emission and noise reductions. - Collision -avoidance systems. - Measurement systems for welds. - Longer life insulated rail joints. Key Suppliers The Australasian Railway Association considers e ight wholly -owned Austral ian divisions of multinational corporations as Tier 1 suppliers. These companies include: United Group Limited ; Downer EDI Rail ; Bombardier Transportation ; Bradken ; Siemens ; Alstom Transport ; QR Limited ; and Railcorp. Both QR Limited and Railcorp have sig nificant capabilities in manufacturing and maintenance. With 38 percent o f goods originating in the U.S., the United States is the single leading country of origin for Australian imports of rail road parts and rolling stock. Other major suppliers are China (22%), Germany (12%), and the Czech Republic (7%) . Sources: Australian Bureau of Statistics and Industry Estimates Prospective Buyers End -users of rail road equipment fall into four groups: 1. State -owned rail operations 2. Private rail operators 3. Maintenance/infrastructure engineering firms 4. EPCM (engineering, procurement, construction, management) contractors At the Federal level, the Australian National Railways Commission (AN) previously operated intrastate freight services in South Austral ia and Tasmania as well as transcontinental rail passenger services. In 1997, the government split AN into three businesses and sold them to: - U.S. based Genesee & Wyoming in consortia with Transfield, a major Australian civil engineering and constructio n firm, and Clyde Engineering (now known as Downer EDI rail) , one of two Australian locomotive and rolling stock manufacturers, which runs South Australia’s rail business . Let us help you export. export. gov The U.S. Commercial Service — Your global business partner. 800 -USA -TRADE Australia: Railroad Equipment Page 4 of 6 - The Australian Transport Network, made up of Wisconsin Central and Tranz Rail ( a privatized New Zealand rail operator ), which runs Tasmania’s rail business . - Great Southern Railway, made up of GB Rail (a U.K. -based passenger rail operator ), Serco ( service industry provider ), and Macquarie Bank , which runs three passenger rail operat ions: The Overland, Indian Pacific , and Ghan. In January 1999, the Victorian Government sold V/Line Freight for US$98 million and franchised its tram and bus operations. Freight Australia (then known as Freight Victoria) was the successful bid ding consortium and also acquired a 45 -year lease on the track. Freight Australia is a subsidiary of Rail America. Other consortium members were Macquarie Bank, A Goninan (rolling stock maintenance), and Fluor Daniel (infrastructure maintenance). In October 2000, the Wes tern Australian Government sold Westrail, its freight business, to Australian Railroad Group (ARG) , a joint venture between Wesfarmers and Genesee & Wyoming. In 2002, the Federal Government and NSW and Victorian State Governments so ld their National Rail Corporation (NRC) to Toll Holdings Limited and Lang Corporation Limited, two publicly -listed Australian transport companies. Pacific National is now Australia’s largest private rail freight business. Queensland's passenger and frei ght business, QR, remains a vertically integrated and profitable government - owned operation. Market Entry Australian distributors seek long -term contracts with rail operators and maintenance and engineering firms. The success of companies which purely distribute and/or manufacture often depends on their ability to diversify either through taking on additional agencies or entering into joint venture arrangements. State -owned rail authorities and OEM manufacturers will go directly to the U.S. if the comp onent is not available locally but their preference is to deal with domestic suppliers. Some European and U.S. suppliers have established branch offices or subsidiaries in Australia. U.S. firms have also successfully entered into joint venture or licen sing arrangements with Australian manufacturers. For large -scale railroad pro jects, companies use EPCM (engineering, procurement, construction, and management) contractors to assist in project design and development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WODONGA Train Crash 6.02
    RAIL INVESTIGATION REPORT Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service Wodonga, Victoria 25 April 2001 ATSB Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service ISBN 0 642 20047 5 odonga 6.02 W 1800 621 372 621 1800 www.atsb.gov.au Department of Transport and Regional Services Australian Transport Safety Bureau RAIL INVESTIGATION REPORT Derailment of passenger train 8622, Sydney – Melbourne daylight XPT service, Wodonga, Victoria 25 April 2001 ISBN 0 642 20047 5 June 2002 This report was produced by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608. Readers are advised that the ATSB investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing safety. Consequently, reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As ATSB believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, copyright restrictions do not apply to material printed in this report. Readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, but should acknowledge ATSB as the source. ii CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 5 3. INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY 7 4. FACTUAL INFORMATION 9 4.1.1 XPT background 9 4.1.2 Wodonga 10 4.2 Sequence of events 11 4.2.1 The incident 11 4.2.2 Subsequent events 13 4.3 Injuries 15 4.4 Damage 15 4.4.1 Damage to the train 15 4.4.2 Damage to the rail infrastructure 18 4.5 Train crew involved 20 4.6 Train Information 21 4.6.1 Train Consist 21 4.6.2 Rolling stock date
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy
    NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy Department of Infrastructure NORTH WEST FREIGHT TRANSPORT STRATEGY Final Report May 2002 This report has been prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, VicRoads, Mildura Rural City Council, Swan Hill Rural City Council and the North West Municipalities Association to guide planning and development of the freight transport network in the north-west of Victoria. The State Government acknowledges the participation and support of the Councils of the north-west in preparing the strategy and the many stakeholders and individuals who contributed comments and ideas. Department of Infrastructure Strategic Planning Division Level 23, 80 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 www.doi.vic.gov.au Final Report North West Freight Transport Strategy Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i 1. Strategy Outline. ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Strategy Outcomes.................................................................................................................1 1.3 Planning Horizon.....................................................................................................................1 1.4 Other Investigations ................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Locolines Edition 68
    LOCOLINES Contents EDITION 68 APR 2017 Loco Lines is published by the Locomotive Secretary’s Report 3 Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus Industry Union – Victorian Branch. Presidents Report 8 Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial Assistant Sec Report 10 members of the Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the V/Line S.C.S Report 13 magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a cost of $20.00 per year. V/Line Stranded Gauge 15 Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Division members are Where is it? 1 6 published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or ‘A special train in half an hour’ Article 1 8 tour information. Maurice Blackburn 21 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. V/Line Cab Committee Report 28 We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other purposes. ‘Livestock Traffic’ Article 30 Contributions are printed at the discretion Talkback with Hinch 3 2 of the publisher. Signal Sighting V/line 35 Loco Lines, or any part thereof, cannot be reproduced or distributed without the Nelsons Column 3 6 written consent of the Victorian Locomotive Division. ‘Australia’s forgotten Volunteers’ 38 Publisher Marc Marotta Retirements/ Resignations 40 Have your Say 4 1 Membership form 44 Locomotive Division Representatives Divisional Executive Divisional Councillors Secretary: ...........Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 Metropolitan : ……….......Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Assist. Sec: ...Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 Metropolitan :…….... President: .............Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 Metropolitan : …....
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Partnerships
    PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Department of Infrastructure PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure © State of Victoria 2005 Published by Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure 80 Collins Street, Melbourne March 2005 www.doi.vic.gov.au This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 80 Collins Street, Melbourne. Minister’s Foreword In February 2004, after the failure of the original privatisation framework, the Victorian Government entered into new franchise agreements with Melbourne’s public transport companies, Yarra Trams and Connex. These partnership agreements find the balance between government support for public transport in Melbourne and the operational expertise provided by experienced private rail operators. Almost one year on, the new arrangements are running smoothly, providing stability across the public transport system and giving a solid foundation for a range of improvements in service delivery. Some of the other benefits to passengers that stem from these agreements include: • Additional front-line customer service staff; • Increased security patrols; • Improved driver training programs; • All night New Year’s Eve services; • Additional rolling stock; and • Improved standards for the upkeep of transport facilities. The key themes of this summary report include the background to the failure of the original contracts, the renegotiations, the nature of the new partnership agreements and the challenges of the refranchising process. You can obtain the latest information about Melbourne’s public transport by visiting www.doi.vic.gov.au/transport I commend this report to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific National
    Pacific National Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority on the Review of the Western Australian Railways (Access) Code (2000) March 2005 Legal\100081618.3 1. Executive Summary and Outline 1.1 Executive summary The purpose of the review is to assess how effectively the Code meets the objectives of the CPA. The objective of access regulation is to promote efficiency and the CPA seeks to do this, relevantly in the case of rail, by ensuring: • the efficient use of natural monopoly infrastructure; • the efficient investment in natural monopoly infrastructure; and • promoting competition in activities that rely on the use of infrastructure services where it is uneconomic to develop alternative facilities. Pacific National's experience as an access seeker or access provider in virtually all jurisdictions in Australia means it is well placed to provide information about whether the Code meets the objectives of the CPA. Pacific National believes there are several key areas where the Code does not meet the objectives of the CPA as effectively as it could:- (a) Level and structure of access charges Inducing competition in dependent markets is one of the fundamental aims of the CPA. However, the approach taken to the calculation of ceiling prices in Western Australia permits very high access charges to be set by WNR. This ability presents the possible risk of an access provider setting access charges high enough to deter competitive entry in the haulage of freight on the intrastate network. No above rail competitor has been able to enter the Western Australian intrastate network where competing haulage services have been sought by customers for minerals haulage.
    [Show full text]
  • One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA
    One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA One Rail Australia welcomes the invitation from ESCOSA to respond to the South Australian Rail Access Regime Review Issues Paper (February 2020). The review is timely given recent developments in the rail industry in South Australia, which are set out in detail below. Overall, our position is: • There is no compelling case to change the current regime significantly. • Whilst volumes on intrastate main lines continue to reduce, this has been driven by increased competition from road transport, rather than deficiencies in the access regime. • Other than lower volumes, there has been no significant change in the operation of the market since 2015, such that ESCOSA’s conclusions at the time supporting the continuation of the existing regime should have altered; • The current regime is a cost-effective way to provide protection to both access seekers and access providers in South Australia and provides certainty for all parties through the negotiation and arbitration framework; • ESCOSA reflects a fit-for-purpose regulator for the South Australian rail market given its size relative to the national regulated market which allows for efficient communication and resolution of issues; and • Changing to a national regime would be a costly process during transition and would raise regulatory compliance costs of all parties in the long run. It would also generate risks around the process of transition and there may be opportunity for other parties, such as national transport carriers, to exert market power. The rest of this submission sets out some information about One Rail Australia, an update on the South Australian freight transport industry, an overview of our perceptions of strengths and weaknesses of the current regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Issues
    Economic Issues No. 7 Darwin: A Gateway to Asia? Implications of the Adelaide-Darwin Railway and Port of Darwin Developments for Australian Trade Author: Andrew Symon March 2004 South Australian Centre for Economic Studies Economic Issues ISSN 1445-6826 Copyright: All rights reserved. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the Publisher. Disclaimer: While embodying the best efforts of the investigators/authors, and while every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accuracy, neither the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, the parent Universities, nor the individual authors/investigators, take any responsibility or will accept any liability for any consequences that might arise from reliance on the information presented in this paper. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author(s), and should not be taken to represent the views of the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies or of the two parent Universities of the Centre. Published by: South Australian Centre for Economic Studies PO Box 125 Rundle Mall SA 5000 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (61+8) 8303 5555 Facsimile: (61+8) 8232 5307 Internet: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces Email: [email protected] © SA Centre for Economic Studies, 2004 Subscription and Corporate Membership: Information on Corporate Membership of the SA Centre for Economic Studies may be obtained by contacting the Centre or at our website, www.adelaide.edu.au/saces ii The SA Centre for Economic Studies Economic Issues Director’s Note Welcome to the seventh issue of Economic Issues, a series published by the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies as part of its Corporate Membership Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-Double Truck
    RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION 2002/0003 Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-double Truck Benalla, Victoria 13 October 2002 RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION 2002/0003 Level Crossing Collision Between Steam Passenger Train 8382 and Loaded B-double Truck Benalla, Victoria, 13 October 2002 The map section identified in this publication is reproduced by permission of Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Crown Copyright ©. All rights reserved. www.ga.gov.au Other than for the purposes of copying this publication for public use, the map information from the map section may not be extracted, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form for incorpora- tion into a derived product, in whole or part, without prior written consent of Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Rail enthusiast photographs identified in this publication are reproduced by permission of the owners K. Lofhelm and R. Taylor Copyright ©. All rights reserved. Other than for the purposes of copying this publication for public use, the rail enthusiast photographs may not be extracted, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form for incorporation into a derived product, in whole or part, without prior written consent of the owner/s. ISBN 18 77071 81 1 September 2004 Readers are advised that the Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing transport safety. Consequently, Bureau reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for other purposes. It is ATSB policy to publish and widely distribute in full such reports as an educational tool to increase awareness of the causes of rail accidents so as to improve rail safety.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Train Drivers from D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie
    April 2019 TM Remember when: The irst train drivers From D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Editor Bruce Belbin April 2019 • $10.00 TM Assistant Editor Shane O’Neil April 2019 National Affairs Lawrance Ryan Volume 57, Number 4 Editorial Assistant Darren Tulk International Ken Date Remember when: General Manager Paul Scells The irst train drivers Subscriptions: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Editorial Office: Ph: 02 8394 9016 Fax: 02 9699 1714 ARHS Bookshop: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Mail: 67 Renwick Street, Redfern NSW 2016 Publisher: Australian Railway Historical Society NSW Division, ACN 000 538 803 From D to DR Light Rail 2019 Print Post 100009942 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge Publication No. The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Newsagent Ovato Retail Distribution Pty Ltd Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Distribution Mailing & Distribution Ligare Pty Limited and Australia Post Printing Ligare Pty Limited Features Website www.railwaydigest.com.au Central West NSW: New loops, signalling and platform 30 Facebook www.facebook.com/railwaydigest In recent years a resurgence in intrastate freight business, especially Contributor Guidelines port-related container services and additional passenger services, has Articles and illustrations remain the copyright of the author and publisher. led to an increase in rail activity on the NSW Western Line.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]