Assessing Transition Policies for the Diffusion of Electric Vehicles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing Transition Policies for the Diffusion of Electric Vehicles Imperial College London Department of Earth Science and Engineering Electrochemical Science and Engineering Group Assessing Transition Policies for the Diffusion of Electric Vehicles by Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. Christoph Mazur MRes Business Administration and Engineering, Diploma degree RWTH Aachen University (2011) Design Management, Master of Research Ecole Centrale de Paris (2009) Supervised by: Prof. Nigel Brandon, Energy Futures Lab Dr. Gregory Offer, Mechanical Engineering Department Dr. Marcello Contestabile, Centre for Environmental Policy Submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in System Innovation and Sustainability of Imperial College London and the Diploma of Imperial College London February 2015 1 Abstract Though hybrid, electric or fuel cell cars have the potential to lower carbon emissions in transport, they have not yet penetrated the market sufficiently. Policy makers want to solve that issue but have only limited insights on how to actually allocate their limited resources. To address this, research has started examining the transition of socio- technical systems and the roll-out of past technologies. This has led to the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) framework, which offers a basis to discuss sustainability transitions, transition patterns and pathways. Though it already has provided relevant insights for policy makers on how they can achieve their transition targets, the MLP currently only offers a qualitative framework that only focuses on a narrative understanding of transitions. Quantitative approaches, however, lack the insights from the MLP research strand. Hence, an appropriate mean to assess the effectiveness of policies or firm strategies with regard to future transition pathways is missing. This PhD addresses these shortcomings, creating links between transition science and modelling to allow the examination of sustainability transitions. The outputs help identify suitable policy measures to achieve desired transitions that are compatible with governments’ targets - hence to create (Mission-Oriented) Transition Policies that satisfy environmental and industrial targets. 2 Table of contents I LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ 8 II LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... 12 III DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY .................................................................................. 14 IV COPYRIGHT DECLARATION ........................................................................................ 15 V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 16 VI SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 17 VII STORY OF THIS PHD PROJECT .................................................................................... 18 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 19 1.1 The challenge surrounding transport and climate change ............................................. 20 1.2 Possible technologies and futures that could solve environmental issues in transport 22 1.2.1 Transforming the passenger transport beyond pure technology change .............. 23 1.2.2 Low emission technologies for passenger cars ....................................................... 25 1.2.3 The economics of an individual low emission vehicle ............................................. 28 1.2.4 The potential of low emission vehicles to meet carbon targets ............................. 33 1.3 Policy making for a transition towards low emission vehicles ....................................... 36 2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS, HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................. 40 2.1 The research question .................................................................................................... 41 2.2 Hypothesis ...................................................................................................................... 45 2.3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 46 2.4 Novelty of the thesis ....................................................................................................... 47 2.5 Outline of the thesis ....................................................................................................... 49 3 THEORY, FRAMEWORKS AND METHODOLOGIES ........................................................ 50 3.1 Qualitative methodologies - the theory framework ...................................................... 51 3.1.1 From Schumpeter to the currently used transition sciences - a historical overview .................................................................................................................. 51 3.1.2 Introduction into the research on sustainability transitions ................................... 53 3.1.2.1 Socio-technical systems .................................................................................... 54 3.1.2.2 The Multi-Level Perspective ............................................................................. 55 3.1.3 Visions and Transition pathways ............................................................................. 57 3 3.1.4 The application of transition science ....................................................................... 61 3.2 Computer-based modelling and simulation approaches used so far ............................. 64 3.3 Modelling with System Dynamics ................................................................................... 66 3.3.1 Introduction into System Dynamics ........................................................................ 69 3.3.1.1 Problem articulation ......................................................................................... 72 3.3.1.2 Formulation of the dynamic hypothesis ........................................................... 73 3.3.1.3 Formulation of a simulation model .................................................................. 73 3.3.1.4 Model testing .................................................................................................... 74 3.3.1.5 Policy design and evaluation ............................................................................ 74 4 ASSESSMENT OF POLICIES FOR ELECTRIC CARS IN THE UK AND GERMANY USING THE MLP ......................................................................................................... 76 4.1 Methodology................................................................................................................... 77 4.1.1 Step 1: Analysis of the current system and regime ................................................. 78 4.1.2 Step 2: Identification of a future regime based upon policy targets ...................... 78 4.1.3 Step 3: Identification of a compatible transition pathway ...................................... 79 4.1.4 Step 4: Assessment of whether current policy making supports the proposed transition pathway .................................................................................. 80 4.2 The analysis of policy making in the UK and Germany ................................................... 81 4.2.1 Analysis of the current regime ................................................................................ 81 4.2.1.1 Today’s private car sector in the UK ................................................................. 81 4.2.1.2 Today’s private car sector in Germany ............................................................. 82 4.2.1.3 Today’s private car regime in the UK and Germany ......................................... 83 4.2.2 Identification of a future regime based upon policy targets for the UK and German cases .................................................................................................... 85 4.2.2.1 UK government policy goals for the private car regime................................... 85 4.2.2.2 German government policy goals for the private car regime .......................... 86 4.2.2.3 Potential visions for the future UK and German regimes ................................ 86 4.2.3 Identification of a compatible transition pathway .................................................. 87 4.2.3.1 Potential transition pathways for the UK ......................................................... 87 4.2.3.2 Potential transition pathways and patterns for Germany ............................... 88 4.2.4 Assessment of current policy making with regard to its compatibility with a valid transition pathway ............................................................................... 89 4.2.4.1 Assessment of low carbon vehicle policies in the UK ....................................... 89 4.2.4.2 Assessment of low carbon vehicle policies in Germany ................................... 91 4.3 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 94 4.4 Discussion of study and motivation of the following work ............................................ 97 5 BEHAVIOUR OF THE GERMAN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY SINCE 1990 .......................... 99 4 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • PRCA Register December
    Register for 1st December 2020 - 28th February 2021 3x1 Group Address(es) in the UK Contact Details 11 Fitzroy Place W Little Glasgow 0141 221 0707 G3 7RW [email protected] 26-28 Exchange Street Aberdeen AB11 6PH 16a Walker Street Edinburgh EH3 7LP 210 Borough High Street London SE1 1JX Practitioners (employed and sub-contracted) conducting PA activities this quarter Cameron Grant Patrick Hogan Will Little Graham McKendry Katrine Pearson Fee-Paying clients for whom UK PA consultancy services provided this quarter (i) Client description available Atos Orkney Harbours SICPA The Scottish Salmon Company Viridor Fee-Paying clients for whom UK monitoring services provided this quarter (i) Client description available Scottish Hospitals Inquiry 5654 Address(es) in the UK Contact Details Parchment House Ben Thornton 13 Northburgh Street 020 4534 2980 London [email protected] EC1V 0JP Practitioners (employed and sub-contracted) conducting PA activities this quarter Joseph Costello Imogen Osborne Laura Gabb Liz Morley Sally Payne James Starkie Ben Thornton Fee-Paying clients for whom UK PA consultancy services provided this quarter (i) Client description available Access Fertility Affinity Water Association of British Insurers Centrepoint Drax GKN Automotive HARIBO HySpectral Melrose Sainsbury’s Access Partnership Address(es) in the UK Contact Details 9th Floor Southside David Kaye 105 Victoria Street 0203 143 4900 London [email protected] SW1E 6QT www.accesspartnership.com Other Countries of Operation BELGIUM SENEGAL SINGAPORE
    [Show full text]
  • A Time of Unprecedented Change in the Transport System
    — History — Governance — Trends A time of — People — Future — Scenarios for 2040 unprecedented — Geography change in the transport system January 2019 The Future of Mobility Preface Transport is critical for the economy. It creates opportunities for growth, generates jobs, and fa- cilitates trade and realises economies of scale. It enhances UK competitiveness by improving con- nectivity across local, regional and national areas. Mobility is central to the whole of society. It allows people to connect with places, and shapes how we live our lives. Social changes in the last twenty years have greatly altered how and why we use the transport system; shifts over the next twenty years will likely be even more significant. Changes such as the growing, ageing population will meet technological advances in electric power, digitalisation and automation. These technologies will bring opportunities, offering fresh innovation to existing needs, as well as radical new approaches. They will also bring challenges, however. Realising the full potential of technology requires us to consider how users’ travel behaviour will respond to it, and how all of society and our economy can benefit. To be truly transformational, we need to view transport as a system: to consider it as a whole. The future of transport needs to balance a wide range of considerations. Capacity has a role to play, but it must be linked to making travel more sustainable overall, be this through lower emissions, less travel or better linking our journeys to housing and work. A focus on people is central to the future of mobility. Understanding how citizens and businesses make decisions and interact with technology provides an opportunity to place the user at the heart of an integrated system.
    [Show full text]
  • IPG Spring 2020 Auto & Motorcycle Titles
    Auto & Motorcycle Titles Spring 2020 {IPG} The Brown Bullet Rajo Jack's Drive to Integrate Auto Racing Bill Poehler Summary The powers-that-be in auto racing in the 1920s, namely the American Automobile Association’s Contest Board, prohibited everyone who wasn’t a white male from the sport. Dewey Gaston, a black man who went by the name Rajo Jack, broke into the epicenter of racing in California, refusing to let the pervasive racism of his day stop him from competing against entire fields of white drivers. In The Brown Bullet, Bill Poehler uncovers the life of a long-forgotten trailblazer and the great lengths he took to even get on the track, and in the end, tells how Rajo Jack proved to a generation that a black man could compete with some of the greatest white drivers of his era, wining some of the biggest races of the day. Lawrence Hill Books 9781641602297 Pub Date: 5/5/20 Contributor Bio $28.99 USD Bill Poehler is an award-winning investigative journalist based in the northwest, where he has worked as a Discount Code: LON Hardcover reporter for the Statesman Journal for 21 years. His work has appeared in the Oregonian, the Eugene Register-Guard and the Corvallis Gazette-Times ; online at OPB.org and KGW.com; and in magazines including 240 Pages Carton Qty: 0 Slant Six News , Racing Wheels , National Speed Sport News and Dirt Track Digest . He lives in Salem, Oregon. Biography & Autobiography / Cultural Heritage BIO002010 9 in H | 6 in W How to be Formula One Champion Richard Porter Summary Are you the next Lewis Hamilton? How to be F1 Champion provides you with the complete guide to hitting the big time in top-flight motorsport, with advice on the correct look, through to more advanced skills such as remembering to insert 'for sure' at the start of every sentence, and tips on mastering the accents most frequently heard at press conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Bibliography
    Appendix 1: Bibliography Chapter 1 1 Aston, B. and Williams, M., Playing to Win, Institute of Public Policy Research, 1996. 2 Williams, K., Williams, J. and Thomas D., Why are the British Bad at Manufacturing, Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1983. 3 Economist Intelligence Unit, World Model Production Forecasts 1999. 4 SMMT, Motor Industry of Great Britain 1986, World Automotive Statistics, London. 5 Maxton, G. P. and Wormald, J., Driving Over a Cliff?, EIU Series, Addison-Wesley, 1994. 6 Turner, G., The Leyland Papers, Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1971. 7 World Economic Development Review, Kline Publishing/McGraw Hill, 1994. 8 United Kingdom Balance of Payments, Office for National Statistics, 1998. 9 Court, W., A History of Grand Prix Motor Racing 1906–1951, Macdonald, 1966. 10 Crombac, G., Colin Chapman, Patrick Stephens, 1986. 11 Garrett, R., The Motor Racing Story, Stanley Paul & Co Ltd, 1969. 12 Jenkinson, D., and Posthumus, C., Vanwall, Patrick Stephens, 1975. 13 Hamilton, M., Frank Williams, Macmillan, 1998. 14 Mays, R., and Roberts, P., BRM, Cassell & Company, 1962. 15 Rendall, I., The Power and the Glory, BBC Books, 1991. 16 Underwood, J., The Will to Win. John Egan and Jaguar, W.H.Allen & Co. Ltd, 1989. 17 Henry, A., March, The Grand Prix & Indy Cars, Hazleton Publishing, 1989. 263 264 Britain’s Winning Formula Chapter 2 1 Motor Sports Association, The, British Motorsports Yearbooks, Motor Sports Association [MSA], 1997–9. 2 David Hodges, David Burgess-Wise, John Davenport and Anthony Harding, The Guinness Book of Car Facts and Feats, Guinness Publishing, 4th edn, 1994. 3 Ian Morrison, Guinness Motor Racing Records, Facts and Champions, Guinness Publishing, 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Automotive Industry and the EU
    The UK Automotive Industry and the EU An economic assessment of the interaction of the UK’s Automotive Industry with the European Union April 2014 kpmg.co.uk c | Section or Brochure name © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Introduction by Mike Hawes Europe is fundamental to the current and • Innovation in UK automotive is boosted by significant EU future success of the UK automotive industry R&D funding. In total approximately £3.5 billion has been awarded to UK businesses and universities across all sectors This report examines the evidence why, for UK automotive to encourage growth. businesses large and small, it is critical that the UK has a strong • Free movement of labour within European borders relationship with Europe. gives automotive businesses the ability to blend UK and In recent years, the UK has benefited from significant international talent at all levels of the industry. investments by many of the world’s major vehicle To supplement this report, we asked SMMT members for their manufacturers including BMW Group, Ford, Vauxhall, Jaguar views on the UK’s EU membership. Their verdict is clear. 92% Land Rover, Nissan and Toyota. This attests to the global of automotive companies said it was more beneficial to their nature and dynamism of this sector. The optimism that exists, business for the UK to stay in the EU, the majority with reform.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Automotive Industry and the EU
    The UK Automotive Industry and the EU An economic assessment of the interaction of the UK’s Automotive Industry with the European Union April 2014 kpmg.co.uk c | Section or Brochure name © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Introduction by Mike Hawes Europe is fundamental to the current and • Innovation in UK automotive is boosted by significant EU future success of the UK automotive industry R&D funding. In total approximately £3.5 billion has been awarded to UK businesses and universities across all sectors This report examines the evidence why, for UK automotive to encourage growth. businesses large and small, it is critical that the UK has a strong • Free movement of labour within European borders relationship with Europe. gives automotive businesses the ability to blend UK and In recent years, the UK has benefited from significant international talent at all levels of the industry. investments by many of the world’s major vehicle To supplement this report, we asked SMMT members for their manufacturers including BMW Group, Ford, Vauxhall, Jaguar views on the UK’s EU membership. Their verdict is clear. 92% Land Rover, Nissan and Toyota. This attests to the global of automotive companies said it was more beneficial to their nature and dynamism of this sector. The optimism that exists, business for the UK to stay in the EU, the majority with reform.
    [Show full text]
  • PSD11 Commercial and Employment TBR
    PSD11 Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Commercial and Employment Technical Background Report Updated February 2017 Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Commercial and Employment Technical Background Report Updated February 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 242745-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Central Square Forth Street Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3PL United Kingdom Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Commercial and Employment Technical Background Report Contents Page Glossary i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Introduction to the IAMP 1 1.3 Structure Of This Report 2 2 Evidence Base Review 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Capturing the Growth in the Automotive Industry in the North East 4 2.3 Development of an Enhanced Automotive Proposition for Sunderland and South Tyneside 12 2.4 Land Availability in Sunderland and South Tyneside 18 2.5 IAMP Impacts Study (2015) 21 2.6 Summary 27 3 Key Issues 29 3.1 The Importance of IAMP to the UK and North East 29 3.2 UK Automotive Strategy 30 3.3 Building our Industrial Strategy Green Paper , 2017 31 3.4 Nissan 34 3.5 North East Advanced Manufacturing Employment
    [Show full text]
  • Future Capacities and Capabilities of the UK Steel Industry
    FUTURE CAPACITIES AND CAPABILITIES OF THE UK STEEL INDUSTRY BEIS Research Paper Number 26 Technical Appendices 15 December 2017 This study was conducted by a Grant Thornton UK LLP-led consortium including Hatch Consulting and the Materials Processing Institute. The consortium received support from a steering board containing representatives from the UK steel sector, including: British Steel, Celsa Steel UK, Liberty Steel, Tata Steel UK and UK Steel (the trade association for the UK steel industry). The views expressed in this report are those of the organisations interviewed as part of this research and the Grant Thornton UK LLP-led consortium; they are not necessarily the views of BEIS. We would like to thank the UK steel producers and the many people and organisations who contributed to this study. Their invaluable participation and feedback throughout the project helped ensure that this was a comprehensive undertaking and provides a robust assessment of the future capacities and capabilities of the UK steel industry. 1 Table of Contents 1. Appendix 1: Approach & Methodology _____________________________________ 7 Introduction 7 Q1 Methodology – Historical Demand 8 Q2 Methodology – Sector View 12 Q2 Methodology – Demand Forecast 17 Q3 Methodology – Barriers Analysis 20 2. Appendix 2: Macro View of the UK Steel Industry ___________________________ 25 Introduction __________________________________________________________ 25 True Steel Demand and Finished Steel Demand 27 3. Appendix 3: Sector Analysis ___________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 UK AUTOMOTIVE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 17Th Edition – 2015 Data
    2016 UK AUTOMOTIVE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 17th edition – 2015 data THE SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITED FOREWORD The UK automotive industry in use. Encouragingly, registrations and market share of has once again delivered ultra low emission vehicles hit record levels in 2015, with growth while reducing its a greater range of alternatively fuelled models available environmental impact. SMMT’s than ever before. Increasing the uptake of these vehicles in 17th Sustainability Report, collaboration with government will be critical if we are to which reviews data from 2015, reduce emissions still further in the real world. As well as has seen a further increase increased employment, it is encouraging to see a further in the number of signatories boost in enhanced training available in the sector, with and has a new focus – the training days up 5.6% in 2015. However, with an estimated complete product life-cycle 5,000 vacancies still open in UK Automotive, it is critical that from production, through in- industry and government address the skills challenge and use performance to end-of-life. attract new talent into this prosperous and vibrant sector. n This is timely as mandatory targets now require 95% of the vehicle (by weight) be reused, recycled or recovered. Mike Hawes SMMT Chief Executive We have welcomed two new signatories to the report this year, Aston Martin and Pritex. This brings the total number of signatories to 27, including 11 suppliers. As SMMT is a member organisation that represents the breadth of the automotive KEY FACTS: industry, it is important this report reflects that diversity with input from suppliers, manufacturers and logistics companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive Council Technology Group the Value of Design in the UK Automotive Sector 2016
    Automotive Council Technology Group The Value of Design in the UK Automotive Sector 2016 Design by Abdullah Suruji This report was produced by Coventry University in conjunction with Automotive Council UK and with the support of TATA Motors European Technical Centre, Innovate UK and Design Council. Automotive Council Technology Group The Value of Design in the UK Automotive Sector 2016 Background to the research The UK automotive sector is experiencing the best vehicle production figures since the early 1970s. In 1972, car production was at a high of 1.92 million cars per annum. On current projections, the UK is expected to surpass this record with more than 2 million vehicles being produced annually by 2020. This is expected to result in 9,000 jobs being created with the potential for a further 28,000 new jobs within the supply chain1. Automotive manufacturing turnover rose from £41 billion in 2009 to £69.5 billion in 2014. The majority of vehicles built in the UK are exported (77.3% in 20152), accounting for 11.2% of total UK exports2. The average export value per vehicle has also increased from £10,200 in 2004 to £21,900 in 20142. Much of this can be attributed to brave, innovative and quality design. Alongside high turnover and greater profits, a new-found confidence to invest in the industry for the future has started to blossom. This trend can be seen by the work being undertaken by Bentley3 and TATA Motors4, who are each investing up to £40 million in new research and development (R&D) centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Gearing Up: Getting More Growth Capital Into the UK’S Automotive Supply Chain
    gearing up: getting more growth capital into the UK’s automotive supply chain By Andy Rumfitt The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank which provides a high-level forum for thought leadership and debate on public policy and politics. It seeks to engage politicians, senior decision makers, practitioners, academia, opinion formers and commentators on promoting policies for a fairer society. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) is one of the largest and most influential trade associations in the UK. It supports the interests of the UK automotive industry at home and abroad, promoting a united position to government, stakeholders and the media. The automotive industry is a vital part of the UK economy accounting for £40 billion turnover and £8.5 billion value added. With over 700,000 jobs dependent on the industry, it accounts for more than 10% of total UK exports and invests £1.5 billion each year in R&D. THE SMITH INSTITUTE gearing up: getting more growth capital into the UK’s automotive supply chain This report forms part of the Institute’s ‘policies for change’ programme, which looks at what more could be done to rebuild and rebalance the economy. The work was supported by the SMMT, which acts as the voice of the motor industry, and who want to get a better understanding of the relationship between the financial sector and the UK’s fast changing automotive supply chain. Andy Rumfitt, an economist and expert on the dynamics of growth, has accomplished that task and provided insights on the market conditions and potential for expanding the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Innovation and Adoption
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Amison, Philip; Bailey, David Working Paper Industrial diversity and innovation spillovers: dynamic innovation and adoption WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 45 Provided in Cooperation with: WWWforEurope - WelfareWealthWork, Wien Suggested Citation: Amison, Philip; Bailey, David (2013) : Industrial diversity and innovation spillovers: dynamic innovation and adoption, WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 45, WWWforEurope, Vienna This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/125703 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons
    [Show full text]