DOCSLIB.ORG

Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank January 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Infrastructure Planning Trans-Pennine Upgrade PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Author: Various Version Date Status of Version Rev 1.0 26.01.18 Initial Draft Rev 2.0 02.02.18 Final Draft Rev 3.0 07.02.18 Final Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Scheme and this Report .............................................................. 1 1.2 The Consenting Process ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Structure of this PEIR ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Responding to Consultation ...................................................................................... 3 1.6 Pre-Application Consultation Programme ................................................................. 3 2 THE SCHEME ........................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Background to the Scheme ....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Scheme Objectives ................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Overview ................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Scheme Alignment .................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Earthworks Design .................................................................................................... 6 2.6 Highways Structures ................................................................................................. 8 2.7 Highways Drainage ................................................................................................... 9 2.8 Highways Lighting ..................................................................................................... 9 2.9 Improvements to Local Roads ................................................................................... 9 2.10 Non-Motorised User (NMU) Provision ....................................................................... 9 2.11 Flood Risk Assessment ........................................................................................... 10 2.12 Construction ............................................................................................................ 10 2.13 Demolition ............................................................................................................... 11 2.14 Services and Utility Diversions ................................................................................ 12 2.15 Waste Management ................................................................................................ 12 2.16 Environmental Design ............................................................................................. 12 2.17 Embedded Mitigation .............................................................................................. 13 3 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................... 18 3.1 Assessment Methodology ....................................................................................... 18 3.2 Reasonable Alternatives Studied ............................................................................ 18 3.3 Justification for Chosen Option ............................................................................... 23 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................... 24 4.1 Purpose of EIA Process .......................................................................................... 24 4.2 EIA Work Completed to Date .................................................................................. 24 4.3 Approach to the PEIR ............................................................................................. 28 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report 5 AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................... 30 5.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 30 5.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 33 5.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 33 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ......................................................................................... 38 6.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 38 6.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 39 6.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 40 7 BIODIVERSITY ....................................................................................................... 45 7.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 45 7.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 51 7.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 51 8 LANDSCAPE AND TOWNSCAPE ......................................................................... 63 8.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 63 8.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 67 8.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 67 9 PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES .............................................................................. 82 9.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 82 9.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 85 9.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 85 10 NOISE AND VIBRATION ........................................................................................ 91 10.1 Existing Environmental Conditions .......................................................................... 91 10.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ..................... 93 10.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures .............................................................. 93 11 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ..................................... 100 11.1 Existing Environmental Conditions ........................................................................ 100 11.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ................... 101 11.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 101 12 GEOLOGY AND SOILS........................................................................................ 104 12.1 Existing Environmental Conditions ........................................................................ 104 12.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ................... 108 12.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 109 13 MATERIALS ......................................................................................................... 114 13.1 Existing Environmental Conditions ........................................................................ 114 13.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ................... 118 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report 13.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 118 14 CLIMATE .............................................................................................................. 121 14.1 Existing Environmental Conditions ........................................................................ 121 14.2 Other baseline information to be obtained/surveys to be undertaken ................... 122 14.3 Potential Effects and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 123 15 ASSESSMENT OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ...................................................... 135 16 REFERENCES AND GLOSSARY ........................................................................ 142 APPENDIX A – LANDSCAPE, TOWNSCAPE AND VISUAL RECEPTORS ................... 156 APPENDIX B – SUPPORTING FIGURES ........................................................................ 164 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report LIST OF SUPPORTING FIGURES Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 31-1-2017 Trans Pennine
    Public Agenda Item No. 8(i) DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL CABINET 31 January 2017 Report of the Strategic Director – Economy, Transport and Communities TRANS-PENNINE HIGHWAY PROJECTS (HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE) (1) Purpose of Report To update Cabinet on a number of projects relating to highway links across the South Pennines and to recommend a County Council policy statement on these. (2) Information and Analysis There are currently a number of inter- related pieces of work being undertaken on existing and potential roads across the South Pennines. Essentially, these are a combination of Highways England’s management and maintenance programmes for the strategic road network and priorities for highways improvement emerging from Transport for the North (TfN), which is the sub-national transport body for the north of England. Cabinet will be aware that, in terms of governance, Derbyshire sits within the equivalent Midlands Connect sub-national transport body, but there are clearly strong relationships between the two entities in relation to economic geography and travel. Worthy of note is the considerable amount of work underway relating to connections between Manchester and Sheffield, which inevitably pass through Derbyshire. The key current areas of work on trans-Pennine roads are: • The Mottram Bypass and A57(T) to A57 Link Road The Road Investment Strategy (RIS) which sets out the work of Highways England for the period up to the year 2020-21 includes major schemes which are expected to begin construction during the RIS period. The Mottram Bypass would carry the Trunk Road around the village of Mottram-in-Longdendale (in Tameside) and provide a link between this and the A57 Principal Road near Woolley Bridge in Derbyshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Katrina Keddie Report Warrington Transport Summary 2017-04-11
    Warrington Transport Summary Part I: Overview Warrington Borough Council Project Number: 60433165 April 2017 Warrington Transport Summary Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Katrina Keddie Tom Marsden David Arthur Consultant Associate Director Regional Director Part I: Warrington Transport Summary - Overview Part II: Warrington Transport Summary – Evidence Base Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1.0 12/05/2017 Initial working draft (v0.1) TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director revised following receipt of comments from client 2.0 21/06/2017 Final version TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council Prepared by: Katrina Keddie Consultant AECOM Limited 1 New York Street Manchester M1 4HD UK T: +44 161 601 1700 aecom.com © 2017 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Table of Contents Summary of Transport and Travel
    [Show full text]
  • Ujjper Lllill
    \VHELLAN & CO.'S DIRECTORY. Public Build.ings-Contd. Registmrs of Births and Death.~, :Mallinson, clerk in charge ; ST.GEORGE's Cnucn, Mossley- for UpperMillDistrict, Joshua Greenjield, Thos.Norris, clerk Rev. John Hextal, incumbent; Wrigley, Upper Mill; for in charge; New Delph,EdwJ. Rev. John Jackson, curate Delph District-Wm. Taylor, Whitworth, clerk in charge ; ST.THOMAS' CHURCH, FriarMere Delph Saddleworth, George Lodge, Rev. Joseph Anthony Boake, clerk in charge incumbent County Court, ST,ANN'SCHAPEL,Lydgate Rev. HELD. AT THE COURT HOUSE, Carriers. George Cowell, incumbent UPPER JIULL, :MONTHLY. To J\fANCHESTER,Jno.Hepworth, ST.BRIDGET's CATHoLrcC~A~EL, Judge-John s. T.Greene, Esq. & Thos.Holding,from Delph; :Srooksbottom-Rev. 1~hlham Clerk John Summerscales Aaron Whitworth, from Moss­ Parsons, priest .AssistantClerk-Benj. Tweednle ley; JohnBuckley,fromBrooli- CHRISTIAN BRETHREN, Brook- Baili.ff-Edmund Travis bottom, Mossley; and Chas. bottom Broadbent, from UpperMill- lNDEl'ENDENT CHAPEL, Spring- PETTY SEssiONS Tuesday, Thursday, and Sat- head-Rev. "\Vm_ Dixon urday INDEPENDENT Cn.A.PEL, Delph- are held once a fortnight at To MANCHESTER, Wm. Green- Rev. John George UJjper lllill. hough &JamesWinterbottOin, INDEPENDENT CHAPEL, Upper The J\'l:agistrates generall~ 111 from Greenfield; & William 1\Iill-Rev. Simeon Dyson attendance are Rev. Rhd.Whrte- Lawton, from Delph-every METHODIST NEw CoNNEXION lock, M.A.; James Lees, ERq.; Saturday CHAPELs, :1\iossley, & Shude John Bu~kley, Esq.~; Jas. Hey- To MANCHESTER, Jas. Buckley, hill, Delph woo~ Whrtehead, Esq.; . Thos. from Greenfield; and Wm. 1VEsLEYANMETHonrsT0HAPELs, Ro~mson, Esq.; & FrancisFdk. Booth, from J\Iossley,-Tues- Delph, Upper:Mill, Greenfield, Whitehead, Esq. day and Saturday Mossley, & Baguley hill MECHANrcs'INsTITUTE,Up.l\1ill-- Conveyance by Water, Poor Law Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolsover North East Derbyshire Leader
    BOLSOVER NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE LEADER PROGRAMME EVALUATION FEBRUARY 2014 Foreword The past few years have not been easy for our local rural communities and businesses. Government cuts and the economic downturn have led to reduced services and difficulties in accessing much needed finance which has resulted in restricted growth for this area. The £2.4m which the Bolsover North East Derbyshire LEADER Programme has delivered since 2008 into the economies of both Council areas, has played a major part in supporting business, encouraging visitors and creating much needed new jobs. As Chair of the Local Action Group, I have seen projects develop from the first expression of interest through to the finished article, be that a new piece of equipment, a new business or even a new hotel. All of the LEADER funded projects, from the smallest to the biggest, have contributed to the enhancement of the area and to the growth of the local economy. This evaluation document explains what the BNED LEADER Programme has achieved and the rationale for doing what it has. I hope you find the document both informative and interesting. We are now looking forward to submitting a bid for more funding in the next Rural Development Programme which is due to start in 2015 and will run until 2020. By talking with and listening to local people and businesses, we hope to deliver as much, if not more in the next programme to improve our area and communities. Cllr Ken Savidge Chair BNED LEADER Page 2 of 30 CONTENTS Page Foreword 2 Executive Summary 4 Diversification into
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 05/01/2011, 18.30
    Public Document Pack SOUTHPORT AREA COMMITTEE Date: Wednesday 5th January, 2011 Time: 6.30 pm Venue: Town Hall, Southport AREA COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Ainsdale Ward Birkdale Ward Councillor Councillor Jones, Conservative Party Brodie - Browne, Liberal Democrats Porter, Conservative Party Hands (Chair), Liberal Democrats Preece, Liberal Democrats Shaw, Liberal Democrats Cambridge Ward Dukes Ward Councillor Councillor Glover, Conservative Party Byrom, The Labour Party McGuire, Liberal Democrats Pearson, Conservative Party Preston, Liberal Democrats Sir Ron Watson, Conservative Party Kew Ward Meols Ward Councillor Councillor Booth, Liberal Democrats Dodd, Liberal Democrats Weavers, Liberal Democrats D Rimmer, Liberal Democrats Tattersall, Liberal Democrats Norwood Ward Advisory Group Members Councillor Lord Fearn, Liberal Democrats Mr. J. Fairhurst Mr. S. Sugden B Rimmer (Vice-Chair), Liberal Democrats Mrs. M. Pointon Sumner, Liberal Democrats COMMITTEE OFFICER: Paul Fraser Telephone: 0151 934 2068 Fax: 0151 934 2034 E-mail: [email protected] If you have any special needs that may require arrangements to facilitate your attendance at this meeting, please contact the Committee Officer named above, who will endeavour to assist. A G E N D A (This first part of the meeting will take place in the Birkdale Room). 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest Members and Officers are requested to give notice of any personal or prejudicial interest and the nature of that interest, relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the relevant Code of Conduct 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Pages 5 - 22) Minutes of the meeting held on 17 November 2010 Part A These items are for consultation or information of interest to the local communit y.
    [Show full text]
  • Helping Hand for Issue Kenning Good Neighbour Winners Page 3 Park Page 3
    35th Edition • April 2016 HHoming In cosots 25p a compy to print in gin In this Helping hand for issue Kenning Good Neighbour Winners page 3 Park page 3 New Look Neighbourhood Services page 8-9 Win £1,000 in vouchers! page 20 Dear Reader ell done to the In this issue we’ve included winners of our information about important 2015 Good changes to the way we deliver Estates Walkabout our Neighbourhood Services. We Neighbour of W have introduced a new team of opportunity to win £1,000 in the Year Awards! Housing and Support Officers and shopping vouchers with our We were delighted to present Managers for each area – so you Direct Debit prize draw. the prizes to our worthy winner will notice a change in faces. Anyone setting up a new Direct Lorraine Jones, who received The Housing and Support staff Debit, between now and the end £150 in shopping vouchers. Our will continue to deliver the of September will be fantastic runners-up Steve Jones normal estate and tenancy automatically entered into a and Stuart Brown received £75 in management services, but they national prize draw for one of vouchers. will also be responsible for five top prizes. Direct Debit is Going the extra mile for a carrying out some of the the easiest and quickest way to neighbour, or a local community, independent living service duties. pay your rent – and our staff will can make such a big difference To find out more about the help you set one up. and is definitely something worth changes and the staff for your To find out more about the celebrating.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms
    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Tameside Locality Assessments GMSF 2020
    November 2020 Transport Locality Assessments Introductory Note and Assessments – Tameside allocations GMSF 2020 Table of contents 1. Background 2 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 2 1.2 Policy Context – The National Planning Policy Framework 3 1.3 Policy Context – Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5 1.4 Structure of this Note 9 2. Site Selection 10 2.1 The Process 10 2.2 Greater Manchester Accessibility Levels 13 3. Approach to Strategic Modelling 15 4. Approach to Technical Analysis 17 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Approach to identifying Public Transport schemes 18 4.3 Mitigations and Scheme Development 19 5. Conclusion 23 6. GMSF Allocations List 24 Appendix A - GMA38 Ashton Moss West Locality Assessment A1 Appendix B - GMA39 Godley Green Garden Village Locality Assessment B1 Appendix C - GMA40 Land South of Hyde Locality Assessment C1 1 1. Background 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 1.1.1 The GMSF is a joint plan of all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, providing a spatial interpretation of the Greater Manchester Strategy which will set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2037. It will: ⚫ identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 Local Authorities, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; ⚫ ensure we have an appropriate supply of land to meet this need; ⚫ protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; ⚫ allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; ⚫ support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; ⚫ define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester.
    [Show full text]
  • LFRMS Consultation Report Appendices
    Appendix A DRAFT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY DOCUMENT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR STOCKPORT February 2016 Foreword by Executive Member It is with great pleasure that we can present to the public the progress we have made and the improvements that we plan to undertake to re-establish Stockport Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority for the Stockport area. We have made great progress in a short period of time and this Strategy endorses that. I certainly accept the new duties and responsibilities the Council has to help our community and look forward to developing a closer relationship with residents and other multi-disciplined agencies with an interest in water and its impact on the built environment and natural environment. I welcome and applaud the support the Council has from its partners in risk management. The beauty, amenity and critical resource of water should certainly be appreciated but also acknowledged that the power of nature can deliver adverse effects that can have a huge impact on us all and for many years. The reality of major flood events in Stockport is relatively small in comparison to other areas, but some risk will remain in areas with large urbanisation and buried waterways. Flood risk management requires the support of all key stakeholders including local residents, organisations and businesses as we all have responsibilities. If we work together then the potential impacts of floods in Stockport can be minimised. 2 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Background 7 1.2. Aims of the Strategy Error! Bookmark not defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Wight One Cowes Sports Reserves Westwood Park, Cowes
    Isle of Wight One Binstead & COB Binstead Rec Brighstone Brighstone Rec Carisbrooke United Clatterford Rec Cowes Sports reserves Westwood Park, Cowes GKN GKN Sports Ground, East Cowes Newchurch Watery Lane, Newchurch Newport IOW reserves St Georges Park, Newport Niton Springhead, Niton Northwood St Johns Northwood Rec Oakfield Oakfield Rec St Helens Blue Star The Green, St Helens Sandown Fairway Sports Centre, Sandown PO36 9JH Shanklin County Ground, Shanklin West Wight Camp Road, Freshwater Isle of Wight Two ArretonAthletic Seaclose Park Brading Town reserves Peter Henry Ground, Brading East Cowes Victoria Athletic reserves Beatrice Avenue, East Cowes Kyngs Towne Rowborough Field, Brading Rookley Highwood Lane, Rookley Ryde Saints Pell Lane, Ryde Seaview Seaview Rec Shanklin VYCC Sandown High School, The Fairway, Sandown PO36 9JH Ventnor Watcombe Bottom Sports Centre, Whitwell Road, Ventnor PO38 1LP Whitecroft & Barton Sports Sandy Lane, Whitecroft Wroxall Castle Road, Wroxall Yarmouth & Calbourne Yarmouth Recreation Ground Isle of Wight Three Bembridge Steyne Park, Bembridge Cowes Old Boys Cowes High School, Crossfield Avenue, Cowes PO31 8HB East Cowes Youth Old Boys Osborne Middle School Gurnard Sports Northwood Rec Osborne Coburg Medina Leisure Centre, Fairlee Raod, Newport PO30 2DX Pan Sports Downside School, Furrrlongs, Newport PO30 2AX Wakes Wootton Rec Isle of Wight Combination One Binstead & COB reserves Binstead Rec Brading Town “A” Peter Henry Ground, Brading Brighstone reserves Brighstone Rec Carisbrooke United reserves Clatterford
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extent of Longdendale 1360 with Introduction and Notes by P.H.W
    The Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire Volume 140: start THE RECORD SOCIETY OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE FOUNDED TO TRANSCRIBE AND PUBLISH ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE TWO COUNTIES VOLUME CXL The Society wishes to acknowledge with gratitude the support given towards publication by The Marc Fitch Fund The Aurelius Foundation Cheshire County Council Lancashire County Council © The Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire J.H. Harrop P.H.W. Booth S.A. Harrop ISBN 0 902593 63 3 Printed in Great Britain by J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd. Extenta dominii de Longdendale anno xxxiiif Edwardi tercij EXTENT OF THE LORDSHIP OF LONGDENDALE 1360 Edited by John Harrop with Paul Booth and Sylvia Harrop PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY 2005 FOR THE SUBSCRIPTION YEAR 2002 COUNCIL AND OFFICERS FOE THE YEAR 2002 President Jenny Kermode, B.A., Ph.D. Hon. Council Secretary Dorothy J. Clayton, M.A., Ph.D., A.L.A., F.R.Hist.S., c/o John Rylands University Library of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M l3 9PP Hon. Membership Secretary Maureen Barber, B.A., D.L.A., 7 Rosebank, Lostock, Bolton BL6 4PE Hon. Treasurer and Publications Secretary Fiona Pogson, B.A., Ph.D., c/o Department of History, Liverpool Hope University College, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD Hon. General Editor Philip Morgan, B.A., Ph.D., F.R.Hist.S. (from March 2002 Peter McNiven, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.Hist.S., The Vicarage, 1 Heol Mansant, Pontyates, Llanelli, Carmarthenshire SA15 5SB) Other Members of the Council Diana E.S. Dunn, B.A., D.Ar. Studies B.W.
    [Show full text]