VIP Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VIP Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment VISUAL IMPACT PROVISION Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of Existing Electricity Transmission Infrastructure in Nationally Protected Landscapes in England and Wales VISUAL IMPACT PROVISION Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of Existing Electricity Transmission Infrastructure in Nationally Protected Landscapes in England and Wales Technical Report Professor Carys Swanwick Gillespies Land Use Consultants October 2014 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report has been written by Professor Carys Swanwick acting as Independent Adviser to National Grid on the Visual Impact Provision Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment project, with contributions from the teams from Gillespies and Land Use Consultants who carried out the detailed field survey work for the project. We would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by Ian McKenna and Hector Pearson at National Grid, the helpful comments from members of the Stakeholder Advisory Group, and the input from landscape staff of the authorities responsible for the National Parks and AONBs that were visited. The core project teams for the consultants were: Gillespies Sarah Gibson Rebecca Greatrix Rob Meetham Luke McGuiness Peter Livings Land Use Consultants Kate Ahern Rebecca Knight Sam Oxley Paul Macrae Edith Lendak Contact Details: Professor Carys Swanwick Gillespies Land Use Consultants [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 2 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 CONTENTS PART ONE: ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Chapter 1: Introduction 9 1.1 The Visual Impact provision 9 1.5 The Stakeholder Advisory Group 9 1.9 The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Project 10 1.16 This report 11 Chapter 2: Assessment Method 14 2.1 Overall approach to assessment 14 2.1 Origins of the method 14 2.3 Scope and definitions 14 2.4 Overview of approach and method 14 2.5 Details of the assessment method 15 2.5 Development of the method 15 2.7 Outline of the method 15 2.8 Determining appropriate scope of the work 16 2.10 Definition of assessment subsections 16 2.12 Desk study and baseline information 16 2.15 Identifying landscape and visual receptors 17 2.22 Viewpoint Selection 18 2.24 Assessing the importance of the impacts 19 2.24 General framework 19 2.27 Assessment of impacts on landscape 19 2.37 Assessment of impacts on views and visual amenity 24 2.46 Assessing the overall importance of landscape and visual impacts on 26 assessment subsections 2.50 Identification of mitigation opportunities 27 Chapter 3: Outcomes of the assessment 29 3.1 Assessment sections and subsections 29 3.2 Comparing relative importance of sections and subsections 29 3.5 Step 1 29 3.7 Step 2 30 3.8 Step 3 30 3 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 3.9 Step 4 30 3.13 Step 5 32 3.17 Suggested shortlist of subsections for further investigation 33 PART TWO: DESIGNATED AREA SUMMARIES Chapter 4: National Parks 55 4.1 Brecon Beacons 55 4.7 Lake District 56 4.9 New Forest 56 4.19 North York Moors 58 4.22 Peak District 58 4.31 Snowdonia 60 4.40 South Downs 61 Chapter 5: Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty 68 5.1 Anglesey 68 5.5 Blackdown Hills 68 5.7 Cannock Chase 69 5.10 Chilterns 69 5.18 Clwydian Range and Dee Valley 70 5.22 Cornwall 71 5.24 Cotswolds 71 5.33 Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire 73 5.37 Dedham Vale 73 5.40 Dorset 74 5.52 Forest of Bowland 76 5.56 High Weald 76 5.63 Kent Downs 77 5.74 North Wessex Downs 79 5.93 Shropshire Hills 82 5.96 Solway Coast 82 5.100 Suffolk Coast and Heaths 83 5.103 Tamar Valley 83 5.106 Wye Valley 84 4 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 Chapter 6: Lines adjacent to designated areas 105 6.1 Northumberland National Park 105 6.5 Pembrokeshire Coast National Park 105 6.7 Howardian Hills AONB 106 6.10 Quantock Hills AONB 106 APPENDIX Sample survey record sheets with guidance on interpretation 113-125 List of Tables Table 2.1 Factors considered in judging the susceptibility of landscape receptors Table 2.2 Factors considered in judging value of landscape receptors Table 2.3 Judging the scale of the impact on the landscape Table 2.4 Judging the geographical extent of the impact on the landscape Table 2.5 Judging the importance of the impact on the landscape Table 2.6 Judging the value of the view from each viewpoint Table 2.7 Judging the scale of the impact at the viewpoint Table 2.8 Judging the importance of the impact at the viewpoint Table 2.9 Judging the geographical extent of the visual impact Table 2.10 Judging importance of the impact on visual amenity of the receptor group Table 2.11 Example of scoring summary on survey record sheet Table 3.5 Comparison of effects of different rankings to top ranked sections Table 3.6 Assessment table for lines adjacent to designated areas Assessment Tables (All at the end of Chapter 3 – Pages 35 to 52) Table 3.1 Alphabetical assessment table including accommodation and scenic routes Table 3.2 Ranked assessment table including accommodation and scenic routes Table 3.3 Alphabetical assessment table minus accommodation and scenic routes Table 3.4 Ranked assessment table minus accommodation and scenic routes 5 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 List of Figures Figure 1 National Grid transmission infrastructure and designated landscapes 13 Overviews for National Parks (all at the end of Chapter 4 – Pages 64 to 70) Figure 2 Overview map and assessment scores for Brecon Beacons National Park Figure 3 Overview map and assessment scores for Lake District National Park Figure 4 Overview map and assessment scores for New Forest National Park Figure 5 Overview map and assessment scores for North York Moors National Park Figure 6 Overview map and assessment scores for Peak District National Park Figure 7 Overview map and assessment scores for Snowdonia National Park Figure 8 Overview map and assessment scores for South Downs National Park Overview maps for Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (all at the end of Chapter 5 – Pages 85 to 104) Figure 9 Overview map and assessment scores for Anglesey AONB Figure 10 Overview map and assessment scores for Blackdown Hills AONB Figure 11 Overview map and assessment scores for Cannock Chase AONB Figure 12 Overview map and assessment scores for Chilterns AONB Figure 13 Overview map and assessment scores for Clwydian Range and Dee Valley AONB Figure 14 Overview map and assessment scores for Cornwall AONB Figure 15 Overview map and assessment scores for Cotswolds AONB Figure 16 Overview map and assessment scores for Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire AONB Figure 17 Overview map and assessment scores for Dedham Vale AONB Figure 18 Overview map and assessment scores for Dorset AONB Figure 19 Overview map and assessment scores for Forest of Bowland AONB Figure 20 Overview map and assessment scores for High Weald AONB Figure 21 Overview map and assessment scores for Kent Downs AONB Figure 22 Overview map and assessment scores for North Wessex Downs AONB Figure 23 Overview map and assessment scores for Shropshire Hills AONB Figure 24 Overview map and assessment scores for Solway Coast AONB Figure 25 Overview map and assessment scores for Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB Figure 26 Overview map and assessment scores for Tamar Valley AONB Figure 27 Overview map and assessment scores for Wye Valley AONB Overview maps for lines adjacent to designated landscapes (all at the end of Chapter 6 – Pages 108 to 118) Figure 28 Overview map and assessment scores for Northumberland National Park Figure 29 Overview map and assessment scores for Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Figure 30 Overview map and assessment scores for Howardian Hills AONB Figure 31 Overview map and assessment scores for Quantock Hills AONB 6 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 PART ONE OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT 7 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 8 VIP Project Technical Report Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment October 2014 Chapter 1: Introduction The Visual Impact Provision 1.1 Ofgem and National Grid have agreed a new set of price controls and incentives for the period from April 2013 to March 2021. This includes a provision of £500 million for electricity transmission owners to mitigate the visual impact of existing electricity infrastructure in nationally protected landscapes in Great Britain. For National Grid, which is the transmission owner in England and Wales, this means considering the effects of existing infrastructure on the visual amenity and landscapes of National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs). National Grid have referred to this as the Visual Impact Provision (VIP). 1.2 In 2012-13 National Grid prepared a Visual Impact Provision policy setting out how the fund would be used and how stakeholders would be engaged in identifying opportunities for maximising benefits from it. After a public consultation on the draft between July and September 2013 the policy statement was presented to Ofgem for review. The policy statement made it clear that National Grid’s objective: “is to achieve the maximum enhancement to the landscape from the available funds whilst ensuring that no significant adverse impacts arise as a result”. 1.3 The policy document included a set of guiding principles and a commitment to the creation of a Stakeholder Advisory Group consisting of stakeholders with national remits for England and Wales, and ways of engaging other stakeholders.
Recommended publications
  • LCA Introduction
    The Hambleton and Howardian Hills CAN DO (Cultural and Natural Development Opportunity) Partnership The CAN DO Partnership is based around a common vision and shared aims to develop: An area of landscape, cultural heritage and biodiversity excellence benefiting the economic and social well-being of the communities who live within it. The organisations and agencies which make up the partnership have defined a geographical area which covers the south-west corner of the North York Moors National Park and the northern part of the Howardian Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The individual organisations recognise that by working together resources can be used more effectively, achieving greater value overall. The agencies involved in the CAN DO Partnership are – the North York Moors National Park Authority, the Howardian Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, English Heritage, Natural England, Forestry Commission, Environment Agency, Framework for Change, Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber, Ryedale District Council and Hambleton District Council. The area was selected because of its natural and cultural heritage diversity which includes the highest concentration of ancient woodland in the region, a nationally important concentration of veteran trees, a range of other semi-natural habitats including some of the most biologically rich sites on Jurassic Limestone in the county, designed landscapes, nationally important ecclesiastical sites and a significant concentration of archaeological remains from the Neolithic to modern times. However, the area has experienced the loss of many landscape character features over the last fifty years including the conversion of land from moorland to arable and the extensive planting of conifers on ancient woodland sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptism Data Available
    Suffolk Baptisms - July 2014 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1813 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1813 1900 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1754 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1813 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1754 1900 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1754 1899 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1754 1812 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1754 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1754 1812 Battisford, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1899 Bawdsey, St Mary the Virgin Wilford 1754 1902 Baylham, St Peter Bosmere 1754 1900 09 July 2014 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2014 Page 1 of 12 Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping
    [Show full text]
  • Dedham Parish Plan June 2011
    Dedham Parish Plan Your Village – Your Way ..putting ideas into actions “““..“..........Dedham,Dedham, a ppplaceplace you feel proud to live inin”””” Dedham Resident June 2011 www.dedhamparishplan.org Supported by Dedham Parish Plan Page 2 June 2011 Contents FOREWORD ..........................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................6 LIVING IN DEDHAM ...............................................................................7 TRANSPORT..........................................................................................8 ROADS & TRAFFIC................................................................................9 PARKING ...............................................................................................9 PLANNING ...........................................................................................10 SAFETY & CRIME ................................................................................11 COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY ................................................................12 YOUNG PEOPLE .................................................................................13 ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION ...................................................13 SOCIAL WELLBEING ...........................................................................14 PUBLIC SERVICES & AMENITIES.......................................................16 BUSINESS WELLBEING ......................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Johannsen
    Working Party 7.03.15 - Social dimensions of forest health – Nick Johannsen Name Nick Johannsen Institution Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (UK IUCN Protected Landscape) Broad Nick is a practitioner in landscape conservation and enhancement working at a research strategic level. Nick’s academic background is as an Environmental Scientist and area (e.g. Landscape Ecologist. discipline) Key research Landscape conservation strategy themes Community engagement (max. 3 Landscape, environment and art bullet points) Tree health Chalara Fraxinea (Ash Dieback) but with interests also in Oak Processionary Moth issues and Oriental Chestnut Gall covered (max. 3 bullet points) Geographical UK/ Kent and South East England research area Methodologi As a practitioner we work through community and stakeholder engagement, but cal approach also refer to research, policy and other evidence sources. When developing strategy (type of documents we use Strategic Environmental Assessment and Sustainability Appraisal, methods, Habitat Regulations Assessment and Equalities Impact Assessment methods. quantitative, qualitative etc.) Current The most relevant current project is ‘The Ash Project’ a cultural celebration of Ash projects Trees in the British Landscape. Other current projects include research to establish the place of Protected Landscapes in the future of the London City Region; the development of integrated landscape management in the Darent Valley which ranges from natural flood management to the celebration of a famous Victorian Artist Samuel Palmer; the mitigation of electricity pylons and other electricity lines in the landscapes of the Kent Downs; the preservation and celebration of traditional orchards in the landscape; linking access to nature with health and wellbeing; innovative ways to engage young people in the landscape and its management.
    [Show full text]
  • Countryside Character Volume 3: Yorkshire & the Humber
    Countryside Character Volume 3: Yorkshire & The Humber The character of England’s natural and man-made landscape Contents page Chairman’s Foreword 4 Areas covered by more than one 1 volume are shown Introduction 5 hatched 2 3 The character of England 5 The Countryside Commission and 8 4 countryside character 5 6 How we have defined the character of 8 England’s countryside – The National Mapping project 8 7 – Character of England map: a joint approach 11 8 – Describing the character of England 11 The character of England: shaping the future 11 This is volume 3 of 8 covering the character of England Character Areas page page 21 Yorkshire Dales 13 30 Southern Magnesian Limestone 63 22 Pennine Dales Fringe 20 33 Bowland Fringe and Pendle Hill 69 23 Tees Lowlands 26 34 Bowland Fells 75 24 Vale of Mowbray 32 35 Lancashire Valleys 79 25 North Yorkshire Moors and Cleveland Hills 37 36 Southern Pennines 83 26 Vale of Pickering 43 37 Yorkshire Southern Pennine Fringe 89 27 Yorkshire Wolds 48 38 Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and 28 Vale of York 53 Yorkshire Coalfield 95 29 Howardian Hills 58 39 Humberhead Levels 101 40 Holderness 107 41 Humber Estuary 112 42 Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes 117 43 Lincolnshire Wolds 122 44 Central Lincolnshire Vale 128 45/7 The Lincolnshire Edge with Coversands/ Southern Lincolnshire Edge 133 51 Dark Peak 139 Acknowledgements The Countryside Commission acknowledges the contribution to this publication of a great many individuals, partners and organisations without which it would not have been possible. We also wish to thank Chris Blandford Associates, the lead consultants on this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Appearance of Paintings by John Constable
    return to list of Publications and Lectures Changes in the Appearance of Paintings by John Constable Charles S. Rhyne Professor, Art History Reed College published in Appearance, Opinion, Change: Evaluating the Look of Paintings Papers given at a conference held jointly by the United Kingdom institute for Conservation and the Association of Art Historians, June 1990. London: United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, 1990, p.72-84. Abstract This paper reviews the remarkable diversity of changes in the appearance of paintings by one artist, John Constable. The intention is not simply to describe changes in the work of Constable but to suggest a framework for the study of changes in the work of any artist and to facilitate discussion among conservators, conservation scientists, curators, and art historians. The paper considers, first, examples of physical changes in the paintings themselves; second, changes in the physical conditions under which Constable's paintings have been viewed. These same examples serve to consider changes in the cultural and psychological contexts in which Constable's paintings have been understood and interpreted Introduction The purpose of this paper is to review the remarkable diversity of changes in the appearance of paintings by a single artist to see what questions these raise and how the varying answers we give to them might affect our work as conservators, scientists, curators, and historians. [1] My intention is not simply to describe changes in the appearance of paintings by John Constable but to suggest a framework that I hope will be helpful in considering changes in the paintings of any artist and to facilitate comparisons among artists.
    [Show full text]
  • People Enjoying Nature Pilot Study Evaluation Report Jayne Ashe (Assistant Development Officer, PHLP) 3Rd August 2017
    PEN Pilot Study Evaluation Report People Enjoying Nature Pilot Study Evaluation Report Jayne Ashe (Assistant Development Officer, PHLP) 3rd August 2017 Forest of Bowland AONB 1 PEN Pilot Study Evaluation Report Contents People Enjoying Nature ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background to the PEN project .......................................................................................................................................... 3 PEN Pilot Project......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Planning the Pilot – What We Wanted to Happen? ....................................................................................................... 4 What actually happened? ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Evaluation and Feedback ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methods of Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ty'r Orsaf, Gellilydan, Blaenau Ffestiniog, Gwynedd LL41 4RB ● £200,000 a Characterful Former Railway Masters Residence in Snowdonia with Over ½ Acre of Gardens!
    Ty'r Orsaf, Gellilydan, Blaenau Ffestiniog, Gwynedd LL41 4RB ● £200,000 A characterful former railway masters residence in Snowdonia with over ½ Acre of gardens! . Detached Character House - Circa. 1860 . Exceptional Views Towards The Moelwyn Range . Former Station Masters Residence . Extensive Gardens, Parking & Double Garage . Charming Interior Sympathetically Modernised . Oil Central Heating & uPVC Double Glazing . 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom & Wetroom . Located In The Heart Of Beautiful Snowdonia . 2 Reception Rooms & Useful Utility Area . A Really Interesting Property - Viewing Essential Cy merwy d pob gof al wrth baratoi’r many lion hy n, ond eu diben y w rhoi arweiniad Ev ery care has been taken with the preparation of these particulars but they are f or cyff redinol y n unig, ac ni ellir gwarantu eu bod y n f anwl gy wir. Cofiwch ofy n os bydd general guidance only and complete accuracy cannot be guaranteed. If there is any unrhy w bwy nt sy ’n neilltuol o bwy sig, neu dy lid ceisio gwiriad proff esiynol. point which is of particular importance please ask or prof essional v erification should Brasamcan y w’r holl ddimensiy nau. Nid y w cyf eiriad at ddarnau gosod a gosodiadau be sought. All dimensions are approximate. The mention of any f ixtures f ittings &/or a/neu gyf arpar y n goly gu eu bod mewn cyf lwr gweithredol eff eithlon. Darperir appliances does not imply they are in f ull eff icient working order. Photographs are ffotograff au er gwy bodaeth gyff redinol, ac ni ellir casglu bod unrhy w eitem a prov ided f or general inf ormation and it cannot be inf erred that any item shown is ddangosir y n gy nwysedig y n y pris gwerthu.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank January 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Infrastructure Planning Trans-Pennine Upgrade PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Author: Various Version Date Status of Version Rev 1.0 26.01.18 Initial Draft Rev 2.0 02.02.18 Final Draft Rev 3.0 07.02.18 Final Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Scheme and this Report .............................................................. 1 1.2 The Consenting Process ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Structure of this PEIR ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Responding to Consultation ...................................................................................... 3 1.6 Pre-Application Consultation Programme ................................................................. 3 2 THE SCHEME ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West of Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Section 4
    West of Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Section 4. Coastal Area D November 2011 Final 9T9001 A COMPANY OF HASKONING UK LTD. COASTAL & RIVERS Rightwell House Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW United Kingdom +44 (0)1733 334455 Telephone Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title West of Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Section 4. Coastal Area D Document short title Policy Development Coastal Area D Status Final Date November 2011 Project name West of Wales SMP2 Project number 9T9001 Author(s) Client Pembrokeshire County Council Reference 9T9001/RSection 4CADv4/303908/PBor Drafted by Claire Earlie, Gregor Guthrie and Victoria Clipsham Checked by Gregor Guthrie Date/initials check 11/11/11 Approved by Client Steering Group Date/initials approval 29/11/11 West of Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Coastal Area D, Including Policy Development Zones (PDZ) 10, 11, 12 and 13. Sarn Gynfelyn to Trwyn Cilan Policy Development Coastal Area D 9T9001/RSection 4CADv4/303908/PBor Final -4D.i- November 2011 INTRODUCTION AND PROCESS Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Introduction to the SMP. The Environmental The Background to the Plan . Principles Assessment Process. Historic and Current Perspective . Policy Definition . Sustainability Policy . The Process . Thematic Review Appendix A Appendix B SMP Development Stakeholder Engagement PLAN AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT Section 4 Appendix C Introduction Appendix E Coastal Processes . Approach to policy development Strategic Environmental . Division of the Coast Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Katrina Keddie Report Warrington Transport Summary 2017-04-11
    Warrington Transport Summary Part I: Overview Warrington Borough Council Project Number: 60433165 April 2017 Warrington Transport Summary Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Katrina Keddie Tom Marsden David Arthur Consultant Associate Director Regional Director Part I: Warrington Transport Summary - Overview Part II: Warrington Transport Summary – Evidence Base Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1.0 12/05/2017 Initial working draft (v0.1) TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director revised following receipt of comments from client 2.0 21/06/2017 Final version TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council Prepared by: Katrina Keddie Consultant AECOM Limited 1 New York Street Manchester M1 4HD UK T: +44 161 601 1700 aecom.com © 2017 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Table of Contents Summary of Transport and Travel
    [Show full text]
  • White Horse Trail Directions – Westbury to Redhorn Hill
    White Horse Trail Route directions (anti-clockwise) split into 10 sections with an alternative for the Cherhill to Alton Barnes section, and including the “short cut” between the Pewsey and Alton Barnes White Horses S1 White Horse Trail directions – Westbury to Redhorn Hill [Amended on 22/5, 26/5 and 27/5/20] Maps: OS Explorer 143, 130, OS Landranger 184, 173 Distance: 13.7 miles (21.9 km) The car park above the Westbury White Horse can be reached either via a street named Newtown in Westbury, which also carries a brown sign pointing the way to Bratton Camp and the White Horse (turn left at the crossroads at the top of the hill), or via Castle Road in Bratton, both off the B3098. Go through the gate by the two information boards, with the car park behind you. Go straight ahead to the top of the escarpment in the area which contains two benches, with the White Horse clearly visible to your right. There are fine views here over the vale below. Go down steps and through the gate to the right and after approx. 10m, before you have reached the White Horse, turn right over a low bank between two tall ramparts. Climb up onto either of them and walk along it, parallel to the car park. This is the Iron Age hill fort of Bratton Camp/Castle. Turn left off it at the end and go over the stile or through the gate to your right, both of which give access to the tarmac road. Turn right onto this.
    [Show full text]