Size Related Variability in the Summer Diet of the Blackfin Tuna
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25 (2009), 669–675 Received: July 28, 2008 Ó 2009 The Authors Accepted: March 12, 2009 Journal compilation Ó 2009 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01327.x ISSN 0175–8659 Size related variability in the summer diet of the blackfin tuna (Thunnus atlanticus Lesson, 1831) from Tobago, the Lesser Antilles By M. Headley1,2, H. A. Oxenford2, M. S. Peterson3 and P. Fanning4 1Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism Secretariat, Kingstown, St Vincent and the Grenadines; 2Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Bridgetown, St Michael, Barbados; 3Department of Coastal Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, MS, USA; 4Food and Agriculture Organisation, Subregional Office in the Caribbean, Christ Church, Barbados Summary longevity greater than 5 years and perhaps up to 8 years Blackfin tuna (Thunnus atlanticus) is a small epipelagic oceanic (Collette and Nauen, 1983; Neilson et al., 1994; Collette, 2002). species known only from the western Atlantic. In Tobago, the The diet of blackfin tuna is broadly described in Collette Lesser Antilles, blackfin tuna is caught by the artisanal fishery. (2002), but the diet of this species from the Lesser Antilles is The diet of this species was examined during the summer of unknown. As such, the primary goal of this study was to 2004 for fish landed at the Charlotteville fish market in determine the summer diet of blackfin tuna landed in Tobago, Tobago. T. atlanticus ranged from 32 to 91 cm FL (0.7– with specific objectives being to examine diet relative to gender 12.4 kg). Overall numerical abundance of prey items com- and body size. prised fish (48%), crustaceans (46%) and cephalopods (6%). Prey species included small pelagics such as anchovies (ranked Methods as most important prey overall), juveniles of larger pelagics such as jacks, juveniles of fish found in coral reef communities Blackfin tuna were sampled daily at the fish market in as adults, e.g. squirrelfishes, and some mesopelagic species. Charlotteville, Tobago (Fig. 1) from 31 July to 17 September The importance of major diet categories differed significantly 2004. On landing, all fish were brought to the market; blackfin with predator size, with fishes becoming more important and tuna were randomly selected, wet weighed whole on a Salter crustaceans less important with increasing size of the blackfin 20 kg hanging scale to the nearest 0.1 kg, measured for fork tuna. This study has improved our scant knowledge of the length (FL) to the nearest 1.0 cm with a flexible tape and blackfin tuna diet in the Lesser Antilles. tagged with flagging tape to allow identification at gutting. For each fish, the time of capture (morning = 8.00–12.00 hours, or afternoon = 14.00–18.00 hours) was also noted. The vis- Introduction cera were subsequently removed by the fish vendors and Blackfin tuna (Thunnus atlanticus) is a warmwater species fishers, and bagged together with their identifying flagging tape known only from the western Atlantic off MarthaÕs Vineyard, labels. Stomachs were then wet weighed to the nearest 1.0 g on Massachusetts in the north, throughout FAO Area 31, south a field balance and Ôstate of fullnessÕ was assessed visually at the to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The limiting factor in its distribution fish market as 0 = empty, 1 = ¼ full, 2 = ½ full, 3 = ¾ full appears to be the 20°C isotherm (Collette, 2002; Froese and and 4 = full. Stomachs were then placed into individually Pauly, 2008). Blackfin tuna is seasonally important to artisanal labelled Ziploc bags containing saturated brine (made from (small-scale commercial) and sport fisheries throughout the rock salt), stored in covered buckets, and examined within Lesser Antilles (Mahon, 1990, 1993; Doray et al., 2002), and in 1 day after collection. other locations in the wider Caribbean including Cuba (Carles Prey items were identified to the lowest possible taxon using and Valle, 1989; Carles Martin, 2002), the Dominican Barnes (1987), Brusca and Brusca (1990), Carpenter (2002), Republic (ICCAT, 2006), the Bahamas and Florida (Mahon, Froese and Pauly (2004), and Wood and Day (2004). The 1993; Collette, 2002), Venezuela (ICCAT, 2006), Bermuda condition of the prey items was recorded as 1 = fresh (almost (Luckhurst et al., 2001), and Brazil (Freire et al., 2005). The completely intact), 2 = bleached (had most of the skin but reported exploitation of T. atlanticus has increased consider- was discoloured), 3 = skinned (all skin was missing and only ably from around 600 tonnes in the 1950s to 2000 t by the late flesh remained), 4 = broken (broken pieces that belonged to 1970s, to 4000 t by the early 2000s, with a peak of 5258 t in one individual), and 5 = fragments and bones. Whole prey 2002 (FishStat Plus; http://www.fao.org). items were counted and measured (fish in FL, cephalopods in Despite the obvious importance of this species, very few mantle length and crustaceans from the eyes to telson) studies have specifically examined blackfin tuna, with a dearth individually to the nearest 0.1 cm. Unidentifiable prey items of information on the biology of small tunas in general were recorded as such. Prey items were individually weighed (ICCAT, 2004). Aspects of T. atlanticus biology are summa- (except crustaceans) and the total weight for each taxon group rized in Idyll and de Sylva (1963), Carles (1971), Collette and present in any stomach was recorded to the nearest 1.0 g. Nauen (1983), Collette (2002) and Freire et al. (2005). Blackfin When it was not possible to obtain length measurements or tuna are considered one of the small tunas, reaching a counts due to advanced digestion, the fragments and bones maximum size of around 100 cm fork length and having a were simply weighed and recorded as unidentified. U.S. Copyright Clearance Centre Code Statement: 0175–8659/2009/2506–0669$15.00/0 670 M. Headley et al. 16°35'N occurrence in the diet. We used three predator size groups (small, medium and large), coinciding with observed cohorts in Guadeloupe the predator catch (see below). Separate SpearmanÕs rank correlations were performed to examine further associations between predator size and the number of fishes and of s Dominica crustaceans consumed. e l l Results i Martinique t A total of 184 blackfin tuna (64 females, 109 males and 11 of undetermined gender) were caught by the artisanal fishery in n Charlotteville, Tobago between 31 July and 17 September 2004 A and examined for stomach contents. Mean size was 66 cm FL (range 32–91 cm) and 6.4 kg (range 0.7–12.4 kg). Three size r e cohorts were considered: small (0.75–3.25 kg), medium (3.5– St Vincent s 9.75 kg) and large (10–12.5 kg) predators for the purposes of Barbados s this study (Fig. 2). e No empty stomachs were observed; the number of prey L items per stomach varied from 1 to 36, and 81.6% of the blackfin tuna had stomachs that were half full or more (Fig. 3). Grenada The condition of the majority of the prey items was fresh, bleached or skinned, which made identification relatively easy; Charlotteville very few prey were in the more advanced stages of digestion (broken, fragments and bones). TOBAGO All Ôstomach fullnessÕ categories were represented in each time period (Fig. 3a), and although the ¼ full category appeared to be slightly more frequent in the afternoon, there Trinidad was no significant difference between morning and afternoon fish in stomach fullness (chi-square 2 · 4 contingency test: v2 = 0.81, df = 3, P = 0.72). Likewise, although females appeared to have slightly fewer full stomachs and more ¼ full 9°28'N stomachs than males (Fig. 3b), there was no significant 63°24'W 58°57'W difference between the sexes in stomach fullness (chi-square Fig. 1. Map of Lesser Antilles showing Tobago and the study site, 2 · 4 contingency test: v2 = 2.00, df = 3; P = 0.58). Charlotteville Importance of prey items in the diet was assessed using Comparison of diet among predator size classes percent numerical abundance, percent frequency, percent total The dietary importance of each major prey category, based on weight, and the index of relative importance (IRI: Corte´ s, frequency of occurrence in stomachs, varied significantly 1997; Oxenford and Hunte, 1999). The relationship is among predator length classes (Kruskal–Wallis tests: for fish 2 IRIi =(%Ni +%Wi) · %Fi, where %Ni is the percent of prey v = 21.356, n = 43, 108, 33, df = 2, P < 0.001; for 2 food item i in number, %Wi is percent of food item i by crustaceans v = 28.223, n = 43, 108, 33, df = 2, weight, and %Fi is the percent frequency of occurrence of the P < 0.001). The median number of fishes consumed by food item i in all stomachs. IRI values are also presented on a blackfin tuna increased with predator size, whilst the median percentage basis (%IRI: Corte´ s, 1997). number of crustaceans decreased (Fig. 4). The correlation Blackfin tuna stomach fullness between time of day between predator length and prey number is highly significant collected, and between males and females were compared with chi-square contingency tests. Diet data were initially examined using frequency of occurrence of prey items by family, but 12 Small subsequently pooled into three major prey categories: fishes, Medium crustaceans and cephalopods; prey items belonging to most 10 Large families occurred too infrequently across tunas to justify an 8 analysis at the family level (23 of the 27 prey families identified occurred in < 10% of tunas). Predator gender and size were 6 considered as factors influencing diet in preliminary analyses, Frequency but gender was omitted in the final analyses because there was 4 no evidence that it played a role.