DOCSLIB.ORG

A Global Valuation of Tuna an Update February 2020 (Final)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Global Valuation of Tuna an Update February 2020 (Final) Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna an update February 2020 (Final) ii Report Information This report has been prepared with the financial support of The Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed in this study are purely those of the authors. The content of this report may not be reproduced, or even part thereof, without explicit reference to the source. Citation: Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., Defaux, V., Llewellin, P., and James, P., 2019. Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna (an update). Report produced by Poseidon Aquatic Resources Management Ltd. Client: The Pew Charitable Trusts Version: Final Report ref: 1456-REG/R/02/A Date issued: 7 February 2020 Acknowledgements: Our thanks to the following consultants who assisted with data collection for this study: Richard Banks, Sachiko Tsuji, Charles Greenwald, Heiko Seilert, Gilles Hosch, Alicia Sanmamed, Anna Madriles, Gwendal le Fol, Tomasz Kulikowski, and Benoit Caillart. 7 February 2020 iii CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. STUDY METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 3 3. TUNA LANDINGS ..................................................................................................... 5 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ....................................................................................... 5 3.2 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 6 4. DOCK / FIRST SALE EX-VESSEL VALUES .......................................................... 13 4.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ..................................................................................... 13 4.2 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 17 5. FINAL CONSUMED END VALUES ........................................................................ 20 5.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ..................................................................................... 20 5.2 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 25 Annexes ANNEX 1: POSEIDON 2016 REPORT .......................................................................................................... 30 Tables TABLE 1: TUNA LANDINGS OF SELECTED SPECIES 2012, 2014, 2016 AND 2018 (TONNES) ............................ 7 TABLE 2: 2018 LANDINGS OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES BY GEAR (TONNES, AND %)....................................... 8 TABLE 3: LANDINGS BY FLAG STATE OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES, 2012, 2014, 2016, AND 2018 (TONNES) ... 9 TABLE 4: LANDINGS OF TUNA, TUNA-LIKE SPECIES AND BILLFISH IN 2016 AND 2017 (TONNES, AND % OF TOTAL YEARLY LANDINGS) .......................................................................................................................... 11 TABLE 5: DOCK / FIRST SALE EX-VESSEL VALUES OF LANDINGS OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2016 (IN US$) ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 6: DOCK / FIRST SALE EX-VESSEL VALUES OF LANDINGS OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2018 (IN US$) ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 7: DOCK / FIRST SALE EX-VESSEL VALUES OF LANDINGS OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2016 AND 2018 (IN US$ OF WHOLE ROUND LANDED WEIGHT) ..................................................................................... 19 TABLE 8: FINAL CONSUMED END VALUES OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2016 (IN US$) ............................. 26 TABLE 9: FINAL CONSUMED END VALUES OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2018 (IN US$) ............................. 27 TABLE 10: FINAL CONSUMED END VALUES OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2016 AND 2018 (IN US$/TONNE OF WHOLE ROUND LANDED WEIGHT) ...................................................................................................... 28 TABLE 11: RATIO OF FINAL CONSUMED END VALUES TO DOCK VALUES OF SELECTED TUNA SPECIES IN 2016 AND 2018 .............................................................................................................................................. 29 7 February 2020 iv Acronyms used ALB ............... Albacore BB ................. Pole and line BET ............... Bigeye BFT ............... Atlantic bluefin CCSBT ......... Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna CIF ................ Carriage Insurance and Freight C&F .............. Carriage and Freight EEZ ............... Economic Exclusion Zone e.g. ................ Exempli gratia in Latin meaning ‘for instance’/’for example’ EPO .............. Eastern Pacific Ocean ETRO ............ East Tropical Atlantic EUMOFA ...... The European Market Observatory for Fisheries and Aquaculture Products FAO .............. Food and Agriculture Organisation (of the United Nations) FFA ............... Forum Fisheries Agency FOB .............. Free On Board GN ................ Gillnet GOFM ........... Gulf of Mexico HL ................. Handline IATTC ........... Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission ICCAT ........... International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas IOTC ............. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission LL.................. Longline NE ................. North East NMFS ........... National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA ........... National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration NW ................ North West NWC ............. North West Central OTH .............. Other PBF ............... Pacific bluefin PFMC ........... Pacific Fishery Management Council PS ................. Purse seine RFMO ........... Regional Fisheries Management Organisation SAFE ............ Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation SBT ............... Southern Bluefin tuna SKJ ............... Skipjack SW ................ South West T ................... tonnes TR ................. Troll TROP ............ Tropical Atlantic WCP(O) ........ Western Central Pacific (Ocean) WCPFC......... Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission WTRO ........... West Tropical Atlantic YFT ............... Yellowfin 7 February 2020 1 1. Background and introduction Taken together, seven important tuna species (skipjack, albacore, bigeye, yellowfin, Atlantic bluefin, Pacific bluefin, and southern bluefin1) are among the most economically valuable fish on the planet.2 In a previous study3 completed in 2016 by Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Limited (Poseidon) on behalf of The Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew), analysis of landed volumes and prices for these species at different points in the supply chain, enabled an estimate of first sale ex-vessel values of tuna of US$ 12.2 billion in 2012 and US$ 9.8 billion in 2014. Final consumed values of these seven species were estimated at US$ 33.4 billion in 2012 and at US$ 33.0 billion in 2014. The estimates of final consumed values increased to US$ 41.6 billion in 2012 and US$ 42.2 billion in 2014 when using the total price of tuna cans rather than the drained weight of the tuna in canned products.4 The Poseidon 2016 study adopted an overall methodology (explained fully in that report and so not repeated here) that involved: • Collection of catch statistics for the seven oceanic tunas from relevant Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs), and compilation into a single MS Excel spreadsheet to allow for identification of catches by ocean basin, species, gear used, and fishing fleet flag5. • Mapping of the flow of tuna from each ocean basin to end markets for different species and gear combinations. The main markets included: canning/loining (whether canned in a country in which tuna is landed or transhipped); fresh sashimi markets; frozen sashimi markets; for ranching (bluefin tuna species only); and domestic markets (either in fresh or processed form i.e. sales of tuna not traded internationally, and which do not enter the canning, ranching or sashimi market value chains). The mapping was based on extensive literature reviews and consultations with industry experts to assign proportions (in percentages) of the catch of each species and gear combination for each ocean basin destined or different markets. • Collection of first sale ex-vessel prices for tuna species caught by different gears in different ocean basins and destined for different end markets, and multiplication by the relevant catch volumes to generate dock/first sale ex-vessel sales values in 2012 and 2014. • Collection of final prices of tuna species sold in different types of end markets (canned tuna, sashimi tuna, ‘domestic’ consumption in producing countries, and by-products of canning), and using appropriate conversion rates back to whole live weight of catch, multiplication by the relevant catch volumes to generate final consumed sales values in 2012 and 2014. 1 Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis (SKJ); Bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus (BET); Yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares (YFT); Albacore tuna Thunnus alalunga (ALB); Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus (BFT); Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis (PBF); and southern bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii (SBT). 2 Pew, 2016. Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna 3 Contract ID #27517; August 2014 to October 2015. 4 Macfadyen G., Huntington T., Caillart B. and Defaux V. (2016). Estimate of the global sales values from tuna fisheries. 5 The 2016 Poseidon study commented
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rey, J.C. and Cort, J.L. 1978. Nota Sobre Los Primeros Resultados De La Campaña De Marcado De Túnidos Frente Al Litoral De Castellón
    110 Rey, J.C. and Cort, J.L. 1978. Nota sobre los primeros resultados de la campaña de marcado de túnidos frente al litoral de Castellón. Bol. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. 4 (3): 140–142 Rey, J.C. and Cort, J.L. 1981. Contribution à la connaissance de la migration des Scombridae en Méditerranée Occidentale. Rapp. P-V, Commn. Int. Explor. Scient. Mer Méditerr., 27: 97–98. Rey, J.C., Alot, E. and Ramos, A. 1984. Sinopsis biológica del bonito, Sarda sarda (Bloch), del Mediterráneo y Atlántico Este. Iccat, Coll. Vol. Sci. Pap. 20(2): 469–502. Rey, J.C., Alot, E. and Ramos, A. 1986. Growth of the Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda Bloch, 1793) in the Atlantic and Mediterranean area of the Strait of Gibraltar. Inv. Pesq. 50 (2): 179–185. Robert, M. and Roesti. 1966. The Declining Economic Role of the Mediterranean Tuna Fishery American Journal of Economics and Sociology 25 (1), 77–90. Rodriguez Roda, J. 1966. Estudio de la bacoreta, Euthynnus alleteratus (Raf.) bonito, Sarda sarda (Bloch) y melva, Auxis thazard (Lac.), capturados por las almadrabas españolas. Inv. Pesq. 30: 247–292. Rodriguez Roda, J. 1981. Estudio de la edad y crecimiento del bonito, Sarda sarda (Block), de la costa sudatlantica de España. Inv. Pesq. 45(1):181–186. Rodriguez Roda, J. 1983. Edad y crecimiento de la melva, Auxis rochei (Risso), del Sur de España. Invest. Pesq. (Barc.), 47 (3): 397–402. Sabatés, A. and Recasens, L. 2001. Seasonal distribution and spawning of small tunas, Auxis rochei (Risso) and Sarda sarda (Bloch) in the northwestern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH LIST WISH LIST: a Case for Updating the Canadian Government’S Guidance for Common Names on Seafood
    FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood Authors: Christina Callegari, Scott Wallace, Sarah Foster and Liane Arness ISBN: 978-1-988424-60-6 © SeaChoice November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY . 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 Findings . 5 Recommendations . 6 INTRODUCTION . 7 APPROACH . 8 Identification of Canadian-caught species . 9 Data processing . 9 REPORT STRUCTURE . 10 SECTION A: COMMON AND OVERLAPPING NAMES . 10 Introduction . 10 Methodology . 10 Results . 11 Snapper/rockfish/Pacific snapper/rosefish/redfish . 12 Sole/flounder . 14 Shrimp/prawn . 15 Shark/dogfish . 15 Why it matters . 15 Recommendations . 16 SECTION B: CANADIAN-CAUGHT SPECIES OF HIGHEST CONCERN . 17 Introduction . 17 Methodology . 18 Results . 20 Commonly mislabelled species . 20 Species with sustainability concerns . 21 Species linked to human health concerns . 23 Species listed under the U .S . Seafood Import Monitoring Program . 25 Combined impact assessment . 26 Why it matters . 28 Recommendations . 28 SECTION C: MISSING SPECIES, MISSING ENGLISH AND FRENCH COMMON NAMES AND GENUS-LEVEL ENTRIES . 31 Introduction . 31 Missing species and outdated scientific names . 31 Scientific names without English or French CFIA common names . 32 Genus-level entries . 33 Why it matters . 34 Recommendations . 34 CONCLUSION . 35 REFERENCES . 36 APPENDIX . 39 Appendix A . 39 Appendix B . 39 FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood 2 GLOSSARY The terms below are defined to aid in comprehension of this report. Common name — Although species are given a standard Scientific name — The taxonomic (Latin) name for a species. common name that is readily used by the scientific In nomenclature, every scientific name consists of two parts, community, industry has adopted other widely used names the genus and the specific epithet, which is used to identify for species sold in the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Marlin (Kajikia Audax)
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Striped Marlin (Kajikia audax) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED Status is yet to be determined but will be consistent with the assessment of the south-west Pacific stock by the Scientific Committee of the Central and Western Pacific Fisheries Commission. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Kajikia audax striped marlin Previously known as Tetrapturus audax. Kajikia audax Image © I & I NSW Background lengths greater than 250cm (lower jaw-to-fork Striped marlin (Kajikia audax) is a highly length) and can attain a maximum weight of migratory pelagic species distributed about 240 kg. Females mature between 1.5 and throughout warm-temperate to tropical 2.5 years of age whilst males mature between waters of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.T he 1 and 2 years of age. Striped marlin are stock structure of striped marlin is uncertain multiple batch spawners with females shedding although there are thought to be separate eggs every 1-2 days over 4-41 events per stocks in the south-west, north-west, east and spawning season. An average sized female of south-central regions of the Pacific Ocean, as about 100 kg is able to produce up to about indicated by genetic research, tagging studies 120 million eggs annually. and the locations of identified spawning Striped marlin spend most of their time in grounds. The south-west Pacific Ocean (SWPO) surface waters above the thermocline, making stock of striped marlin spawn predominately them vulnerable to surface fisheries.T hey are during November and December each year caught mostly by commercial longline and in waters warmer than 24°C between 15-30°S recreational fisheries throughout their range.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTE on the Fishery and Some Aspects of the Biology of Dogtooth Tuna, Gymnosarda Unicolor (Ruppell)From Minicoy, Lakshadweep
    I. mar. biol. Ass. India, 47 (1) : 111 - 113, Jan. - June, 2005 NOTE On the fishery and some aspects of the biology of dogtooth tuna, Gymnosarda unicolor (Ruppell)from Minicoy, Lakshadweep M.Sivadas and A.Anasukoya Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Calicut - 673 005, India Abstract The results of a study, on the fishery and biology of dogtooth tuna, Gymnosarda unicolor (Ruppell), conducted at Minicoy during 1995 to 1999 are presented. The resource is exploited from around the reef areas during July-August or September for sustenance when the usual fishing activities like pole and line and trolling are suspended. The total catch in a season varied from 56 to 481 kg. The size ranged from 44 to 126 cm fork length with the modal group at 58 and 62 cm. The length-weight relationship was found to be Log W = -4.5337 + 2.77 Log L. Fish below 70 cm size was found to be immature. The dogtooth tuna, Gymnosarda unicolor Material and methods (Ruppell) is a tropical Indo-Pacific epipe- Data on catch and biological aspects lagic species usually found around coral such as length, weight, feeding condition, reefs. In India, they are reported from maturity, etc were collected almost on a Andaman-Nicobar and from daily basis at the landing centre itself Lakshadweep Islands (Silas and Pillai, during each season. The entrails of the 1982). In Lakshadweep, they are not fishes are removed at the landing centre exploited by pole and line and troll line but are caught regularly, though in few itself before they are taken home.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Some Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Skip Spawning?
    SCRS/2006/088 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60(4): 1141-1153 (2007) DO SOME ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA SKIP SPAWNING? David H. Secor1 SUMMARY During the spawning season for Atlantic bluefin tuna, some adults occur outside known spawning centers, suggesting either unknown spawning regions, or fundamental errors in our current understanding of bluefin tuna reproductive schedules. Based upon recent scientific perspectives, skipped spawning (delayed maturation and non-annual spawning) is possibly prevalent in moderately long-lived marine species like bluefin tuna. In principle, skipped spawning represents a trade-off between current and future reproduction. By foregoing reproduction, an individual can incur survival and growth benefits that accrue in deferred reproduction. Across a range of species, skipped reproduction was positively correlated with longevity, but for non-sturgeon species, adults spawned at intervals at least once every two years. A range of types of skipped spawning (constant, younger, older, event skipping; and delays in first maturation) was modeled for the western Atlantic bluefin tuna population to test for their effects on the egg-production-per-recruit biological reference point (stipulated at 20% and 40%). With the exception of extreme delays in maturation, skipped spawning had relatively small effect in depressing fishing mortality (F) threshold values. This was particularly true in comparison to scenarios of a juvenile fishery (ages 4-7), which substantially depressed threshold F values. Indeed, recent F estimates for 1990-2002 western Atlantic bluefin tuna stock assessments were in excess of threshold F values when juvenile size classes were exploited. If western bluefin tuna are currently maturing at an older age than is currently assessed (i.e., 10 v.
    [Show full text]
  • India's National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean
    IOTC–2015–SC18–NR09[E] India’s National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission’2015 Premchand, L. Ramalingam, A. Tiburtius, A. Siva, Ansuman Das, Rajashree B Sanadi and Rahul Kumar B Tailor Fishery Survey of India Government of India, Botawala Chambers, Sir. P. M. Road, Mumbai 0 INFORMATION OF FISHERIES, RESEARCH AND STATISTICS In accordance with IOTC Resolution 15/02, final YES scientific data for the previous year was Communication F.No.43-6/2014 Fy. II, dated provided to the Secretariat by June of the 03/07/2015 to the Ministry of Agriculture and current year, for all fleets other than Farmer’s Welfare, New Delhi. longline(e.g., for a National report submitted to the Secretariat in 2015, final data for the 2014 Calendar year must be provided to the Secretariat by 30 June’2015) In accordance with IOTC Resolution 15/02, YES provisional longline data for the previous year Communication F.No.43-6/2014 Fy.II, was provided to the Secretariat by 30 June of 03/07/2015 to the Ministry of Agriculture and the current year (e.g., for a National report Farmer’s Welfare, New Delhi. submitted to the Secretariat in 2015, final data for the 2014 Calendar year must be provided to the Secretariat by 30 June’2015) Reminder: Final longline data for the previous year is due to the Secretariat by 30 December of the current year (e.g., for a National report submitted to the Secretariat in 2015, final data for the 2014 Calendar year must be provided to the Secretariat by 30 June’2015) If no, please indicate the reason(s) and intended actions: - Executive Summary Tuna and tuna like fishes are one of the components of pelagic resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Marlin (Makaira Indica) Blue Marlin (Makaira Nigricans) Blue
    Black marlin (Makaira indica) Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) Blue shark (Prionace glauca) Opah (Lampris guatus) Shorin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) Striped marlin (Kaijkia audax) Western Central Pacific, North Pacific, South Pacific Pelagic longline July 12, 2016 Alexia Morgan, Consulng Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external sciensts with experse in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scienfic review, however, does not constute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendaons on the part of the reviewing sciensts. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 About Seafood Watch 3 Guiding Principles 4 Summary 5 Final Seafood Recommendations 5 Introduction 8 Assessment 10 Criterion 1: Impacts on the species under assessment 10 Criterion 2: Impacts on other species 22 Criterion 3: Management Effectiveness 45 Criterion 4: Impacts on the habitat and ecosystem 55 Acknowledgements 58 References 59 Appendix A: Extra By Catch Species 69 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originang from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase producon in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or funcon of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendaons available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservaon issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA's Description of the U.S Commercial Fisheries Including The
    6.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PELAGIC LONGLINE FISHERY FOR ATLANTIC HMS The HMS FMP provides a thorough description of the U.S. fisheries for Atlantic HMS, including sectors of the pelagic longline fishery. Below is specific information regarding the catch of pelagic longline fishermen in the Gulf of Mexico and off the Southeast coast of the United States. For more detailed information on the fishery, please refer to the HMS FMP. 6.1 Pelagic Longline Gear The U.S. pelagic longline fishery for Atlantic HMS primarily targets swordfish, yellowfin tuna, or bigeye tuna in various areas and seasons. Secondary target species include dolphin, albacore tuna, pelagic sharks including mako, thresher, and porbeagle sharks, as well as several species of large coastal sharks. Although this gear can be modified (i.e., depth of set, hook type, etc.) to target either swordfish, tunas, or sharks, like other hook and line fisheries, it is a multispecies fishery. These fisheries are opportunistic, switching gear style and making subtle changes to the fishing configuration to target the best available economic opportunity of each individual trip. Longline gear sometimes attracts and hooks non-target finfish with no commercial value, as well as species that cannot be retained by commercial fishermen, such as billfish. Pelagic longline gear is composed of several parts. See Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1. Typical U.S. pelagic longline gear. Source: Arocha, 1997. When targeting swordfish, the lines generally are deployed at sunset and hauled in at sunrise to take advantage of the nocturnal near-surface feeding habits of swordfish. In general, longlines targeting tunas are set in the morning, deeper in the water column, and hauled in the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Longtail Tuna (Thunnus Tonggol)
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Longtail Tuna (Thunnus tonggol) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED A coastal tuna species for which the recreational fishery is probably more significant than the commercial fishery. There are few useful data with which to establish status. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Previously, but incorrectly called northern Thunnus tonggol longtail tuna bluefin tuna. Thunnus tonggol Image © Bernard Yau Background The longtail tuna reaches maturity at lengths of around 60-70 cm, and spawning takes place The longtail tuna (Thunnus tonggol) inhabits during the summer months. The main diet of continental shelf and ocean waters in warm the longtail tuna consists of small pelagic and temperate and tropical regions of the Indo-west demersal fish, but also includes crustaceans and Pacific. It is a common species in Queensland cephalopods. waters but during the summer it can be found as far south as Twofold Bay in southern NSW. Because of their rapid acceleration, longtail Previously called ‘northern bluefin tuna’ in tuna are highly regarded as sports fish but Australia, the longtail tuna is a relatively small, their very dark flesh gives them a low market slender species that grows to a weight of acceptance. Since about 2000 the NSW 36 kg and length of 136 cm; it is more commercial catch has been less than 2 t per commonly 80-90 cm and 10-15 kg. In year, with most taken by the Ocean Trap and comparison, the true ‘northern bluefin’ (Thunnus Line Fishery and very small amounts reported orientalis) can exceed 500 kg in weight and by the Ocean Hauling and Estuary General reach almost 300 cm in length.
    [Show full text]
  • A Black Marlin, Makaira Indica, from the Early Pleistocene of the Philippines and the Zoogeography of Istiophorid B1llfishes
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 33(3): 718-728,1983 A BLACK MARLIN, MAKAIRA INDICA, FROM THE EARLY PLEISTOCENE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF ISTIOPHORID B1LLFISHES Harry L Fierstine and Bruce 1. Welton ABSTRACT A nearly complete articulated head (including pectoral and pelvic girdles and fins) was collected from an Early Pleistocene, upper bathyal, volcanic ash deposit on Tambac Island, Northwest Central Luzon, Philippines. The specimen was positively identified because of its general resemblance to other large marlins and by its rigid pectoral fin, a characteristic feature of the black marlin. This is the first fossil billfish described from Asia and the first living species of billfi sh positively identified in the fossil record. The geographic distribution of the two living species of Makaira is discussed, Except for fossil localities bordering the Mediterranean Sea, the distribution offossil post-Oligocene istiophorids roughly corresponds to the distribution of living adult forms. During June 1980, we (Fierstine and Welton, in press) collected a large fossil billfish discovered on the property of Pacific Farms, Inc., Tambac Island, near the barrio of Zaragoza, Bolinao Peninsula, Pangasinan Province, Northwest Cen­ tral Luzon, Philippines (Fig. 1). In addition, associated fossils were collected and local geological outcrops were mapped. The fieldwork continued throughout the month and all specimens were brought to the Natural History Museum of the Los Angeles County for curation, preparation, and distribution to specialists for study. The fieldwork was important because no fossil bony fish had ever been reported from the Philippines (Hashimoto, 1969), fossil billfishes have never been described from Asia (Fierstine and Applegate, 1974), a living species of billfish has never been positively identified in the fossil record (Fierstine, 1978), and no collection of marine macrofossils has ever been made under strict stratigraphic control in the Bolinao area, if not in the entire Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Billfish Resources and the Billfish Fisheries in the Western
    SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular ISSN 2070-6065 STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC Source: ICCAT (2015) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1127 SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC by Nelson Ehrhardt and Mark Fitchett School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Miami, United States of America FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bridgetown, Barbados, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109436-5 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate DFNQRZOHGJHPHQWRI)$2DVWKHVRXUFHDQGFRS\ULJKWKROGHULVJLYHQDQGWKDW)$2¶VHQGRUVHPHQWRI XVHUV¶YLHZVSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVLVQRWLPSOLHGLQDQ\ZD\ All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Bermuda's Marine Reserve
    POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF BERMUDA’s MARINE RESERVE ON SPORTFISHING TOURISM The Need to Explore Other Options ECONOMIC RETURNS CAN FLOW TO COASTAL NATIONS that Implement Billfish Conservation Measures Sportfishing eco-tourism is a strong economic driver for communities. Visting anglers are driven by the likelihood of catching a lot of billfish. Anticipated quality of a billfishing trip greatly influences anglers’ destination choices. Anglers most often select fishing destination where commercial fishing is restrained. Responsible management of billfish can maximize catch rates and economic returns to communities. As of 2011, more than 3.2 created Of the visitors who million anglers fished outside visited Panama that did not of the United States (exclud- fish, 30% said they would ing Canada) at least once in be interested in fishing on a the previous five years. Anglers subsequent trip to Panama. have many options when it comes to where they travel to fish, and countries must ISLA MUJERES, give particular attention to the socio-economic benefits MEXICO - Marlin and generated from sportfishing Sport Fishing magazines, both when making decisions that international publications could impact their sportfish- Photo courtesy of Viljoen with widespread circulation in ing industry. With only 0.3% the sportfishing community of these anglers reported to recognized Isla Mujeres, have taken their last fishing Mexico on the Yucatan trip to Bermuda, there is peninsula as being one of great potential for increasing the “most desired sailfishing tourism from sportfishing in destinations.” Marlin rated Bermuda.1 Isla as Number Three among its “Easy Billfish Destinations” to fish for Atlantic sailfish.Sport Fishing magazine rated Isla Mujeres in their “Top 20 Sailfish Hot Spots” of the world.
    [Show full text]