DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Marlin (Makaira Indica) Blue Marlin (Makaira Nigricans) Blue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Marlin (Makaira Indica) Blue Marlin (Makaira Nigricans) Blue Black marlin (Makaira indica) Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) Blue shark (Prionace glauca) Opah (Lampris guatus) Shorin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) Striped marlin (Kaijkia audax) Western Central Pacific, North Pacific, South Pacific Pelagic longline July 12, 2016 Alexia Morgan, Consulng Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external sciensts with experse in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scienfic review, however, does not constute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendaons on the part of the reviewing sciensts. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 About Seafood Watch 3 Guiding Principles 4 Summary 5 Final Seafood Recommendations 5 Introduction 8 Assessment 10 Criterion 1: Impacts on the species under assessment 10 Criterion 2: Impacts on other species 22 Criterion 3: Management Effectiveness 45 Criterion 4: Impacts on the habitat and ecosystem 55 Acknowledgements 58 References 59 Appendix A: Extra By Catch Species 69 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originang from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase producon in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or funcon of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendaons available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservaon issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendaon on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this informaon against the program’s conservaon ethic to arrive at a recommendaon of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternaves” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluaon methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of informaon include government technical publicaons, fishery management plans and supporng documents, and other scienfic reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch® Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture sciensts, and members of industry and conservaon organizaons when evaluang fisheries and aquaculture pracces. Capture fisheries and aquaculture pracces are highly dynamic; as the scienfic informaon on each species changes, Seafood Watch®’s sustainability recommendaons and the underlying Seafood Reports will be updated to reflect these changes. Pares interested in capture fisheries, aquaculture pracces and the sustainability of ocean ecosystems are welcome to use Seafood Reports in any way they find useful. For more informaon about Seafood Watch® and Seafood Reports, please contact the Seafood Watch® program at Monterey Bay Aquarium by calling 1-877- 229-9990. 3 Guiding Principles Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originang from sources, whether fished1 or farmed, that can maintain or increase producon in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or funcon of affected ecosystems. Based on this principle, Seafood Watch had developed four sustainability criteria for evaluang wildcatch fisheries for consumers and businesses. These criteria are: How does fishing affect the species under assessment? How does the fishing affect other, target and non-target species? How effecve is the fishery’s management? How does the fishing affect habitats and the stability of the ecosystem? Each criterion includes: Factors to evaluate and score Guidelines for integrang these factors to produce a numerical score and rang Once a rang has been assigned to each criterion, we develop an overall recommendaon. Criteria rangs and the overall recommendaon are color-coded to correspond to the categories on the Seafood Watch pocket guide and online guide: Best Choice/Green: Are well managed and caught in ways that cause lile harm to habitats or other wildlife. Good Alternave/Yellow: Buy, but be aware there are concerns with how they’re caught. Avoid/Red Take a pass on these for now. These items are overfished or caught in ways that harm other marine life or the environment. 1 “Fish” is used throughout this document to refer to finfish, shellfish and other invertebrates 4 Summary Black marlin (Makaira indica), blue marlin (Makaira nigricans), striped marlin (Kaijkia audax), blue shark (Prionace glauca), shorin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus), and opah (Lampris guatus) are caught by a variety of pelagic longline fisheries operang in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), including the North and South Pacific regions. There are several broadly defined categories of longline fisheries covered in this report. These fisheries may not all directly target the species included in this report but may retain them upon capture. These fisheries include: 1. South Pacific albacore fishery, which comprises domesc vessels from Pacific Island countries that operate in subtropical waters targeng albacore, and distant water vessels from Chinese-Taipei, China, and Vanuatu that fish south of 20° S. 2. South Pacific distant water swordfish fishery, which mostly comprises vessels from Spain. 3. Tropical offshore and distant water tuna fisheries; the offshore fishery includes vessels from Chinese-Taipei and China that are based in the Pacific Island countries, and the distant water fleet comprises vessels from Japan, Korean, Chinese-Taipei, China, and Vanuatu. 4. North Pacific distant water albacore and swordfish fisheries, made up of vessels from Japan, Chinese-Taipei, and Vanuatu. In addion to these fisheries, there are a number of domesc longline fisheries operang in the sub-tropical and temperate areas of the WCPO {SPC 2014}. We have included in this report the North and South Pacific pelagic longline fisheries along with more tropical (WCPO in this report) pelagic longline fisheries. Populaons of striped marlin in the North Pacific Ocean are overfished and undergoing overfishing, but are healthy in the Southwest Pacific region. Blue marlin populaons are healthy throughout their range in the Pacific Ocean. Blue shark populaons in the North Pacific are healthy but their status in the South Pacific is unknown. The statuses of striped and black marlin, opah, and shorin mako shark are unknown. These fisheries interact with a number of bycatch species including other sharks, sea turtles, and seabirds. These species are typically highly suscepble to fishing pressure, and many have been negavely affected by this fishing pressure and are listed as Endangered or Near Threatened by the Internaonal Union for Conservaon of Nature (IUCN). The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) manages tuna and tuna-like species, including billfish and sharks, in the WCPO. There are few management measures in place for target species included in this report, and no formally adopted reference points or harvest control rules are currently in place. Management of bycatch species is also of concern because best-pracce bycatch migaon techniques are not always required. Pelagic longline gears typically have lile to no contact with boom habitats but do interact with ecologically important species, which could cause negave effects to the ecosystem. Final Seafood Recommendaons CRITERION CRITERION 2: 1: IMPACTS IMPACTS ON CRITERION 3: CRITERION 4: ON THE OTHER MANAGEMENT HABITAT AND OVERALL SPECIES/FISHERY SPECIES SPECIES EFFECTIVENESS ECOSYSTEM RECOMMENDATION Blue marlin Green (3.831) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.962) Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Black marlin Yellow (2.644) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.788) Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline 5 Striped marlin Red (1.414) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.529) Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Shorin mako Red (1.414) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.529) shark Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Opah Yellow (2.644) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.788) South Pacific, Pelagic longline Opah Yellow (2.644) Crical (0.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (0.000) North Pacific, Pelagic longline Blue marlin Green (3.831) Crical (0.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (0.000) North Pacific, Pelagic longline Black marlin Yellow (2.644) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.788) South Pacific, Pelagic longline Blue marlin Green (3.831) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.962) South Pacific, Pelagic longline Opah Yellow (2.644) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.788) Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Shorin mako Red (1.414) Crical (0.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (0.000) shark North Pacific, Pelagic longline Shorin mako Red (1.414) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.529) shark South Pacific, Pelagic longline Striped marlin Red (1.414) Crical (0.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (0.000) North Pacific, Pelagic longline Black marlin Yellow (2.644) Crical (0.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (0.000) North Pacific, Pelagic longline Striped marlin Green (3.318) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.893) South Pacific, Pelagic longline Blue Green (3.831) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.962) shark:Northern stock 6 Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Blue Red (1.414) Red (1.000) Red (1.000) Green (3.873) Avoid (1.529) shark:Southern stock Western Central Pacific, Pelagic longline Summary Large pelagic species caught in the Western and Central Pacific longline fishery (blue marlin, black marlin, striped marlin, shorin mako shark, and opah) have an overall recommendaon of “Avoid.” Scoring Guide Scores range from zero to five where zero indicates very poor performance and five indicates the fishing operaons have no significant impact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2016 SWFSC Billfish Newsletter
    The SouthwestSWFSC Fisheries 2016 Billfish Science Newsletter Center’s 2016 Billfish Newsletter Global Tagging Map El Niño fishing conditions Catch-Photo-Release mobile phone application IGFA Great Marlin Race and satellite tagging 1 Top Anglers and Captains of 2015 SWFSC 2016 Billfish Newsletter Table of Contents Special Foreword …………………………………………………………….. 3 An Inside Look ……………………………………………………………..… 4 Prologue …………………………………………………………………….… 5 Introduction ……………………………………………………………..….… 5 The International Billfish Angler Survey ………………………………....... 7 Pacific blue marlin 9 Striped marlin 10 Indo-Pacific sailfish 11 Black marlin 13 Shortbill spearfish 13 Broadbill swordfish 14 The Billfish Tagging Program ……………………………………………..... 14 The Hawaiian Islands 16 2015 Tagging-at-a-Glance Map 17 Baja California and Guerrero, Mexico 18 Southern California 18 Western Pacific 18 Top Anglers and Captains Acknowledgements ……………………………. 19 Top Tagging Anglers 19 Top Tagging Captains 21 Tag Recoveries ……………………………………………………………….. 21 Science in Action: “The IGFA Great Marlin Race and Marlin Tagging” 23 Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………....... 25 Angler Photos ……………………………………………………………..….. 26 Congratulations to Captain Teddy Hoogs of the Bwana for winning this year’s cover photo contest! Teddy photographed this spectacular marlin off the coast of Hawaii. Fish on! 2 Special Forward James Wraith, director of the SWFSC Cooperative Billfish Tagging Program since 2007, recently left the SWFSC to move back to Australia. James was an integral part of the Highly Migratory Species (HMS) program. In addition to day-to-day work, James planned and organized the research cruises for HMS at the SWFSC and was involved in tagging thresher, blue, and mako sharks in the Southern California Bight for many years. We are sad to see him go but are excited for his future opportunities and thankful for his many contributions to the program over the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Marlin (Kajikia Audax)
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Striped Marlin (Kajikia audax) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED Status is yet to be determined but will be consistent with the assessment of the south-west Pacific stock by the Scientific Committee of the Central and Western Pacific Fisheries Commission. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Kajikia audax striped marlin Previously known as Tetrapturus audax. Kajikia audax Image © I & I NSW Background lengths greater than 250cm (lower jaw-to-fork Striped marlin (Kajikia audax) is a highly length) and can attain a maximum weight of migratory pelagic species distributed about 240 kg. Females mature between 1.5 and throughout warm-temperate to tropical 2.5 years of age whilst males mature between waters of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.T he 1 and 2 years of age. Striped marlin are stock structure of striped marlin is uncertain multiple batch spawners with females shedding although there are thought to be separate eggs every 1-2 days over 4-41 events per stocks in the south-west, north-west, east and spawning season. An average sized female of south-central regions of the Pacific Ocean, as about 100 kg is able to produce up to about indicated by genetic research, tagging studies 120 million eggs annually. and the locations of identified spawning Striped marlin spend most of their time in grounds. The south-west Pacific Ocean (SWPO) surface waters above the thermocline, making stock of striped marlin spawn predominately them vulnerable to surface fisheries.T hey are during November and December each year caught mostly by commercial longline and in waters warmer than 24°C between 15-30°S recreational fisheries throughout their range.
    [Show full text]
  • A Black Marlin, Makaira Indica, from the Early Pleistocene of the Philippines and the Zoogeography of Istiophorid B1llfishes
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 33(3): 718-728,1983 A BLACK MARLIN, MAKAIRA INDICA, FROM THE EARLY PLEISTOCENE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF ISTIOPHORID B1LLFISHES Harry L Fierstine and Bruce 1. Welton ABSTRACT A nearly complete articulated head (including pectoral and pelvic girdles and fins) was collected from an Early Pleistocene, upper bathyal, volcanic ash deposit on Tambac Island, Northwest Central Luzon, Philippines. The specimen was positively identified because of its general resemblance to other large marlins and by its rigid pectoral fin, a characteristic feature of the black marlin. This is the first fossil billfish described from Asia and the first living species of billfi sh positively identified in the fossil record. The geographic distribution of the two living species of Makaira is discussed, Except for fossil localities bordering the Mediterranean Sea, the distribution offossil post-Oligocene istiophorids roughly corresponds to the distribution of living adult forms. During June 1980, we (Fierstine and Welton, in press) collected a large fossil billfish discovered on the property of Pacific Farms, Inc., Tambac Island, near the barrio of Zaragoza, Bolinao Peninsula, Pangasinan Province, Northwest Cen­ tral Luzon, Philippines (Fig. 1). In addition, associated fossils were collected and local geological outcrops were mapped. The fieldwork continued throughout the month and all specimens were brought to the Natural History Museum of the Los Angeles County for curation, preparation, and distribution to specialists for study. The fieldwork was important because no fossil bony fish had ever been reported from the Philippines (Hashimoto, 1969), fossil billfishes have never been described from Asia (Fierstine and Applegate, 1974), a living species of billfish has never been positively identified in the fossil record (Fierstine, 1978), and no collection of marine macrofossils has ever been made under strict stratigraphic control in the Bolinao area, if not in the entire Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Billfish Resources and the Billfish Fisheries in the Western
    SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular ISSN 2070-6065 STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC Source: ICCAT (2015) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1127 SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC by Nelson Ehrhardt and Mark Fitchett School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Miami, United States of America FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bridgetown, Barbados, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109436-5 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate DFNQRZOHGJHPHQWRI)$2DVWKHVRXUFHDQGFRS\ULJKWKROGHULVJLYHQDQGWKDW)$2¶VHQGRUVHPHQWRI XVHUV¶YLHZVSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVLVQRWLPSOLHGLQDQ\ZD\ All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Valuation of Tuna an Update February 2020 (Final)
    Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna an update February 2020 (Final) ii Report Information This report has been prepared with the financial support of The Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed in this study are purely those of the authors. The content of this report may not be reproduced, or even part thereof, without explicit reference to the source. Citation: Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., Defaux, V., Llewellin, P., and James, P., 2019. Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna (an update). Report produced by Poseidon Aquatic Resources Management Ltd. Client: The Pew Charitable Trusts Version: Final Report ref: 1456-REG/R/02/A Date issued: 7 February 2020 Acknowledgements: Our thanks to the following consultants who assisted with data collection for this study: Richard Banks, Sachiko Tsuji, Charles Greenwald, Heiko Seilert, Gilles Hosch, Alicia Sanmamed, Anna Madriles, Gwendal le Fol, Tomasz Kulikowski, and Benoit Caillart. 7 February 2020 iii CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. STUDY METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 3 3. TUNA LANDINGS ..................................................................................................... 5 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ....................................................................................... 5 3.2 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Field Techniques Used to Tag Large Pelagic Species In
    FieldField techniquestechniques usedused toto tagtag largelarge pelagicspelagics speciesspecies inin thethe NorthNorth PacificPacific Donald R. Hawn (JIMAR/NMFS Hon Lab) StudyStudy area:area: NorthNorth PacificPacific Primarily in waters around the main Hawaiian Islands PlatformPlatform opportunities:opportunities: HawaiiHawaii--basedbased commercialcommercial longlinelongline vesselsvessels n F/V Sea Pearl (94 ft. schooner) Deck low to the water surface! LonglineLongline vesselsvessels Ø Advantage: Can travel great distances (cruise range 4,000 km) and catch an average of 400 pelagic animals per/trip Ø Disadvantage: Commercial gear difficult to work with (i.e., haul back speed and gear type) ResearcherResearcher food…Yum!food…Yum! EquipmentEquipment Loppers WC Pop-up Archival Transmitting (PAT) tag SubjectSubject animalsanimals Large pelagics (18 – 100 kg): Tuna, billfish and sharks 15 Bigeye tuna 1 Albacore tuna 7 Opah 2 Shortfin mako 1 Monchong TargetTarget area:area: opahopah TargetTarget area:area: tunatuna TaggingTagging instrumentsinstruments andand hardwarehardware Lopper Applicator heads Shark setup FieldField notesnotes Est. Tag Time Set SST Spp./Sex Wt . Date Lat. (N) Long. (W) Comments No. (h) No. (F) (lbs) Fish appeared exhausted but in good shape, tag was implanted a little more BE 110 6 4/25 1202 4 15.35.16 146.36.68 78.0 lateral than expected, hook to the side of mouth with 4 in. of leader, swam away slowly. Good tag, once tagged and released, BE BE 80 1 4/26 2310 5 18.40.25 147.13.39 76.5 swam away in a quick dart maneuver
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Shark Predation and Scavenging on Fishes Equipped with Pop-Up Satellite Archival Tags David W
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NSU Works Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Oceanography Faculty Articles Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences 10-1-2004 Evidence of Shark Predation and Scavenging on Fishes Equipped with Pop-up Satellite Archival Tags David W. Kerstetter Virginia Institute of Marine Science, [email protected] J. Polovina National Marine Fisheries Service - Honolulu John E. Graves Virginia Institute of Marine Science Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Oceanographic Center. Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation David W. Kerstetter, J. Polovina, and John E. Graves. 2004. Evidence of Shark Predation and Scavenging on Fishes Equipped with Pop- up Satellite Archival Tags .Fishery Bulletin , (4) : 750 -756. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles/542. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oceanography Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Oceanography Faculty Articles Oceanographic Center Faculty Publications 10-1-2004 Evidence of Shark Predation and Scavenging on Fishes Equipped with Pop-up Satellite Archival Tags David W. Kerstetter J. Polovina John E. Graves Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Oceanographic Center. Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Oceanographic Center Faculty Publications at NSUWorks.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    atlaFrequentlyntic white Asked mQuestionsarlin 2007 Status Review WHAT ARE ATLANTIC WHITE MARLIN? White marlin are billfish of the Family Istiophoridae, which includes striped, blue, and black marlin; several species of spearfish; and sailfish. White marlin inhabit the tropical and temperate waters of the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas. They generally eat other fish (e.g., jacks, mackerels, mahi-mahi), but will feed on squid and other prey items. White marlin grow quickly and can reach an age of at least 18 years, based on tag recapture data (SCRS, 2004). Adult white marlin can grow to over 9 feet (2.8 meters) and can weigh up to 184 lb (82 kg). WHY ARE ATLANTIC WHITE MARLIN IMPORTANT? Atlantic white marlin are apex predators that feed at the top of the food chain. Recreational fishers seek Atlantic blue marlin, white marlin, and sailfish as highly-prized species in the United States, Venezuela, Bahamas, Brazil, and many countries in the Caribbean Sea and west coast of Africa. White marlin, along with other billfish and tunas, are managed internationally by member nations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). In the United States, Atlantic blue marlin, white marlin, and Atlantic sailfish can be landed only by recreational fishermen fishing from either private vessels or charterboats. WHAT IS A STATUS REVIEW? A status review is the process of evaluating the best available scientific and commercial information on the biological status of a species and the threats it is facing to support a decision whether or not to list a species under the ESA or to change its listing.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-RELEASE MORTALITY of SCHOOL-SIZE ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus Thynnus) in the U.S
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2013 Post-Release Mortality of School-Size Atlantic Bluefin unaT (Thunnus thynnus) in the U.S Recreational Troll Fishery Benjamin Jon Marcek College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Marcek, Benjamin Jon, "Post-Release Mortality of School-Size Atlantic Bluefin unaT (Thunnus thynnus) in the U.S Recreational Troll Fishery" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617936. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-fknv-f695 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POST-RELEASE MORTALITY OF SCHOOL-SIZE ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus thynnus) IN THE U.S. RECREATIONAL TROLL FISHERY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Benjamin Jon Marcek 2013 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Benjamin'Jon Marcek Approved, by the Committee, August 2013 ihn E. Graves, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/Advisor f Mary . Fabrizio, pfct). Richard W. Brill, Ph.D. John M. Brubaker, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Considerations of Pectoral Swimming in the Opah, Lampris Guttatus Author(S): Richard H
    Anatomical Considerations of Pectoral Swimming in the Opah, Lampris guttatus Author(s): Richard H. Rosenblatt and G. David Johnson Source: Copeia, Vol. 1976, No. 2 (May 17, 1976), pp. 367-370 Published by: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1443963 Accessed: 02/06/2010 14:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asih. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Copeia. http://www.jstor.org ICHTHYOLOGICAL NOTES 367 (1936).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermoregulation Strategies of Deep Diving Ectothermic Sharks
    THERMOREGULATION STRATEGIES OF DEEP DIVING ECTOTHERMIC SHARKS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCOTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY (MARINE BIOLOGY) AUGUST 2020 By. Mark A. Royer Dissertation Committee: Kim Holland, Chairperson Brian Bowen Carl Meyer Andre Seale Masato Yoshizawa Keywords: Ectothermic, Thermoregulation, Biologging, Hexanchus griseus, Syphrna lewini, Shark ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to my advisor Dr. Kim Holland and to Dr. Carl Meyer for providing me the privilege to pursue a doctoral degree in your lab, which provided more experiences and opportunities than I could have ever imagined. The research environment you provided allowed me to pursue new frontiers in the field and take on challenging questions. Thank you to my committee members Dr. Brian Bowen, Dr. Andre Seale, and Dr. Masato Yoshizawa, for providing your ideas, thoughts, suggestions, support and encouragement through the development of my dissertation. I would like to give my sincere thanks to all of my committee members and to the Department of Biology for taking their time to provide their support and accommodation as I finished my degree during a rather unprecedented and uncertain time. I am very grateful to everyone at the HIMB Shark Lab including Dr. Melanie Hutchinson, Dr. James Anderson, Jeff Muir, and Dr. Daniel Coffey. I learned so much from all of you and we have shared several lifetimes worth of experiences. Thank you to Dr. James Anderson for exciting side projects we have attempted and will continue to pursue in the future. Thank you to Dr.
    [Show full text]