DOCSLIB.ORG

Allied Air Command Achievements in 2015 ALLIED

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allied Air Command Achievements in 2015 ALLIED Allied Air Command Achievements in 2015 ALLIED Commander AIRCOM declared Full Operational Capability Scrambled over 400 Aircraft to safeguard NATO airspace AIR Conducted 3 successful Baltic Air Policing rotations involving 10 nations, 400 personnel and over 30 aircraft 24/7/365 interim NATO Ballistic Missile Defence COMMAND 24/7 operational control for NATO augmentation of Turkish Air Defence Prepared and executed 8 NATO exercises and supported NATO’s biggest LIVEX in over 13 yrs with 36,000 participants from 21 nations and over 3,000 sorties Executed NATO’s first vignette based exercise proving AIRCOM’s ability as a Joint HQ Deliver Air and Space Convened 2 Air Commanders’ Conferences and 2 NATO Air Chief Symposiums including 5 Partner Air Chief delegates Power for the Alliance Recognised with 8 SACEUR-level awards DACCC trained over 240 students and successfully deployed the DARS twice including once to the Baltic region CAOC Uedem declared Full Operational Capability, passed 4 no-notice verifications and executed 21 internal and external exercises CAOC Torrejon executed 22 external exercises, 8 internal exercises and 6 NATO evaluations Accomplished 2 Mobile Training Team missions to Partners Azerbaijan and Montenegro and 2 Air Expert Staff visits to Sweden and Finland Conducted 25 evaluations including 3 Operational Capability Concept Evaluation and Feedback events plus 7 Readiness Verifications Inspected infrastructure at 40 Airfields and Radar installations across 17 nations Accredited 2 new Air Ground Operations Schools. First NATO Forward Air Controller Capabilities accreditation of a PfP Nation, Sweden, and first Mobile Training Team to Azerbaijan Implemented Air Command and Control System and Air C2 Information Services. Started AIRCOM-wide Air C2 syndicate RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Copyright: HQ AIRCOM Public Affairs Office GERMANY Allied Air Command Allied Air Command Heritage Mission: Deliver Air and Space Power for the Alliance Ramstein Air Base Germany has been home to a NATO Air Power headquarters since 1974. The 2010 NATO Command A ready, responsive, and robust team trained and equipped to Structure reorganisation consolidated 10 air entities into a Vision: single Allied Air Command supported by two regional command and control Air and Space Power for the Alliance Combined Air Operations Centres (CAOCs) and a Deployable Air Command and Control Centre (DACCC). Mission Command Priorities The Allied Air Command Accomplish our Missions provides 24/7 Command and Control of the NATO Integrated Air and Missile Defence across the SACEUR Area of Responsibility. Standing missions include Air Policing and Ballistic Missile Defence. During crisis, the Joint Force Air Component Air Policing NATO Integrated Air & Augmentation of Turkish Headquarters is trained, equipped, and organised to perform Missile Defence Air Defence as a Joint Force Air Component from Ramstein which will plan and execute NATO Air and Space Operations. Finally, the Integrate Emerging Capabilities & Missions AIRCOM Commander serves as the primary advisor and proponent to SACEUR and NATO on all air and space matters. Organisation Deployable Air Command and Operational Control of Ballistic Missile Defence Operational Control of Control Centre NATO Airborne Early Warning Alliance Ground Surveillance CAOC Uedem Respond to Changing Environments HQ AIRCOM DACCC CAOC Torrejon Air Power Options in Support of Integrate our Emerging Capabilities Contribute to Ballistic Missile Defence Develop Air-minded Infrastructure Enhanced NATO Response Forces into Air Command and Control Initial Operating Capability and Logistics across the Alliance A single Headquarters Allied Air Command with 500 airmen from 25 NATO Nations and 3 Partner Nations Always - Advise on Air and Space Matters Plus - Develop a Generation of Leaders Two Combined Air Operations Centres at Torrejon, Spain, and at Uedem, Germany, each with 180 positions One Deployable Air Command and Control Centre at Poggio- Renatico, Italy, with 280 positions More than 50 Control and Reporting Centres/Posts under NATO and national command Some 30 Quick Reaction Alert (Interceptor) air bases for Traditional Education and Strengthen Partnerships and Empower our People Informal Mentoring launch of fighter aircraft executing NATO Air Policing Training Interoperability .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JAPCC Annual Report 2019
    2019 annual REPORT Joint Air Power Competence Centre Joint Air Power www.japcc.org Competence Centre Cover picture: Satellite: © ESA /AOES Medialab; Earth: © 2012 EUMETSAT; Background: © StarLine /shutterstock © This work is copyrighted. All Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von­Seydlitz­Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E­Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated Follow us on Social Media JAPCC | annual REPORT 2019 1 foreword Today, NATO Air Forces stand on the verge of the at the peer­to­peer level. We must use the lessons most meaningful transformation of technology and learned from this and other exercises to evolve our capability in our history, a transformation which con­ Alliance into a connected, Joint All Domain fighting tinues to be enabled in part by the independent force that is agile and capable of acting at speed that thought and analysis from the recognized air and future conflicts will require. I have great confidence space power experts in the Joint Air Power Compe­ that our Nations and our people will work closely with tence Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit-Urgent Priorities
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED ING TH LOW E 20 OL 16 F W R A E R W S O A W P R I S U A M T M N I I T O J URGENT PRIORITIES PRIORITIES URGENT UR ES GENT PRIORITI JOINT AIR POWER FOLLOWING THE 2016 WARSAW SUMMIT URGENT PRIORITIES Joint Air Power Competence Centre JOINT AIR POWER NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit – Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) HQ commis- sioned study conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). All copyright and intellectual property rights reside with HQ ACT, unless otherwise licensed. The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the position of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but are offered to foster dialogue and discussion re- garding urgent priorities in the field of air power capabilities and competencies. Though NATO classified documents may have informed the work of the authors, no clas- sified information has been directly quoted in this study, nor were any parts of classified information re-used in any form without prior sanitization.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017
    DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017 VOLUME 11A, CHAPTER 9 “SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by a (*) preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue and underlined font. The previous version dated May 2015 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added an overview section to comply with the Department of Defense (DoD) Financial Management Regulation (FMR) 090101 Addition Revision Standard Operating Procedures, dated June 15, 2015. 090201 Added definition for “DoD Component.” Addition 090202 Added definition for “Unified Combatant Command.” Addition Added a reference to the National Security Act of 1947 and 090204 Revision to the Joint Publication 1-02. 090206 Added definition for “Military Element.” Addition Added definition for a “Table of Organization and 090211 Addition Equipment.” Expanded the use of United States (U.S.) appropriated funds for U.S. military personnel who are members of an 090507.B.2. Addition international military headquarters that does not maintain a centralized international budget for such purposes. Added six North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Unit (NFIU) support elements at Tallinn, Table 9-1, Estonia; Riga, Latvia; Vilnius, Lithuania; Bydgoszcz, Addition paragraph A.4.f. Poland; Szekesfeharvar, Hungary; and Bratislava, Slovakia as approved by the NATO Defense Ministers on September 5, 2014. Moved from section A.2.g the Headquarters, Multinational Table 9-1, Division South-East at Bucharest, Romania and two NFIU Revision paragraph A.4.r.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 4 2016 Comp Troller
    OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -1100 JAN 4 2016 COMP TROLLER MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR, JOINT STAFF COMPTROLLER, UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND SUBJECT: Updates to Department ofDefense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 9, "Support oflnternational Military Activities" This memorandum updates the listing ofNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Units and Centers of Excellence, and their assigned administrative agent, as currently published in Table 9-1 ofVolume 11A, Chapter 9. These changes will be incorporated into the next chapter update planned for June 2016. Table 9-1, "International Military Headquarter and Related Agencies and Administrative Agents Responsible for Their Support and for Support to U.S. Elements" is revised to add as A.S.m the Center of Excellence- Energy Security (ESCOE) in Vilnius, Lithuania. This change was requested in Attachment 1. The Air Force will serve as the administrative agent. In addition, Table 9-1 is revised to add six new NATO Force Integration Units (NFIUs) with their associated administrative agents as follows: A.2.g.(1) NFIU Sofia, Bulgaria- Air Force; A.2.g.(2) NFIU Bucharest, Romania-Army; A.4.f.(1) NFIU Tallinn, Estonia-Navy; A.4.f.(2) NFIU Riga, Latvia- Navy; A.4.f.(3) NFIU Vilnius, Lithuania-Air Force; and A.4.f.(4) NFIU Bydgoszcz, Poland-Army. These changes were requested in Attachment 2. A draft update of Table 9-1 reflecting these changes is provided as Attachment 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report
    Defence and security after Brexit Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU Compendium report James Black, Alex Hall, Kate Cox, Marta Kepe, Erik Silfversten For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1786 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: HMS Vanguard (MoD/Crown copyright 2014); Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4, A Chinook Helicopter of 18 Squadron, HMS Defender (MoD/Crown copyright 2016); Cyber Security at MoD (Crown copyright); Brexit (donfiore/fotolia); Heavily armed Police in London (davidf/iStock) RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Defence and security after Brexit Preface This RAND study examines the potential defence and security implications of the United Kingdom’s (UK) decision to leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).
    [Show full text]
  • During the Cold War, Some Air Force Fighter Pilots Had More Firepower
    THE TOSS-BOMB PROCEDURE 4. At pitch attitude, the bomb F-100 pilot Lt. 1. Attack begins. Jettison fuel is released to arc toward Harris Kirk races tanks and descend to just the target. After release, for the cockpit above ground level. Engage the pilot now has only 54 during an alert engine afterburner and ap- seconds to escape the exercise at a proach target at 575 mph. nuclear blast. USAFE base in West Germany. 2. Pull up at attack point with a constant four Gs. Monitor the 5. The Mk 7 bomb was the cross-pointer mounted gauge first nuclear weapon that on the instrument panel. could be carried by USAF (and Navy) fighter aircraft. 3. The aircraft pulls into an Immelmann maneuver. The One-Way Nuclear Mission A principal target was the “Fulda Gap,” a logical geograph- During the Cold War, some ical highway for massive Soviet armored formations to pour Turkey. There was also a training group at Sidi Slimane AB, right intermediate station. Still, despite all the extra fuel, the Air Force fighter pilots had into West Germany. A bottleneck there could buy valuable Morocco, and there was an F-100C-equipped air defense Super Sabre’s combat radius was limited. time for NATO to respond to an invasion. squadron in the Netherlands. Targets closer than 450 nautical miles (518 miles) from more firepower than range. The North Atlantic Council had previously approved this The European-based fighter wings were tasked to carry home base did offer a potential round-trip mission. These strategy for NATO in September 1950, with tactical nuclear the new Mk 7 nuclear bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Amount of Quick Reaction Alert
    ale Air Command Secretariat Spitfire Block Headquarters Air Command Royal Air Force High Wycombe Ministry Buckinghamshire of Defence HP14 4UE Ref. 2020/02069 9 March 2020 Dear Thank you for your e-mail of 12 February 2020 asking for information about RAF Quick Reaction Alert flights. Specifically, you requested the following information: "Could you please confirm the amount of Quick Reaction Alert Flights conducted in the last 5 years, from the following Air Stations? - RAF Lossiemouth - RAF Coningsby - RAF Mount Pleasant If possible, broken into those of civilian or military Russian/Argentine origin." I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I can confirm that some information within the scope of your request is held. We do hold recorded information on the number and nature of incidents when RAF Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) aircraft launched against aircraft approaching the UK in the last five years. However, similar information for the aircraft approaching the Falkland Islands is only held centrally for 2017-19 inclusive. Section 26(1)a of the FOI Act provides that we should withhold information which would be likely to prejudice the defence of the British Isles or any Colony. Section 26(1) b of the Act provides that we should withhold information which would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of relevant forces. Section 24(1) of the FOI provides that we should withhold information for the purposes of safeguarding national security. The Act requires that we have to carry out a public interest (PIT) in this respect to show that the reasons for withholding the information outweigh the reasons for releasing the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise Blackdog
    EXERCISE BLACKDOG IVAO XU SPECIAL OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT INTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL AVIATION ORGANISATION XU-SO BLACKDOG20 V1.0 1 GENERAL 3 1.1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 DATE AND TIME .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 VERBAL BRIEFING .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 PILOTS 5 2.1 GUIDELINES ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 ARRIVAL ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 RULES .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 AIRFRAMES ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil/Military Cooperation in Air Traffic Management
    Cir 330 AN/189 Civil/Military Cooperation in Air Traffic Management Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority International Civil Aviation Organization Suzanne Circ 330 AN/189 Civil/Military Cooperation in Air Traffic Management ________________________________ Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority International Civil Aviation Organization Published in separate English, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7 For ordering information and for a complete listing of sales agents and booksellers, please go to the ICAO website at www.icao.int Cir 330, Civil Military Cooperation in Air Traffic Management Order Number: Cir330 ISBN 978-92-9231-693-8 © ICAO 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the International Civil Aviation Organization. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................... (v) Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................. (vii) Acronyms and abbreviations .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JAPCC) Is a NATO-Accredited Centre of Excellence Which Provides Support to NATO but Is Not Part of the NATO Command Structure
    Joint Air Power Competence Centre Space Branch Lt Col Henry Heren, USA Space Force J Royal Danish Defence College Space Webinar NATO‘s Take on Space as a Separate Operational Domain 23 November 2020 1 Disclaimer – The Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) is a NATO-accredited Centre of Excellence which provides support to NATO but is not part of the NATO Command Structure. – This briefing is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO and is designed to provide an independent position. – Personal and non-commercial use of this material is permitted. Permission to reprint/republish this material or to reuse any part of this work for any other purposes must be obtained from the Joint Air Power Competence Centre. – For permission and further information, please email us at [email protected]. Agenda • Organisation & Background • NATO Space Functional Areas • Military use of Space – the NATO perspective • Evolution of Space in NATO • Future Space Considerations Organization & Background Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) A NATO Centre of Excellence (COE) multi-nationally established and sponsored entity, which offers recognized expertise and experience Air & Space Power to the benefit of the Alliance within the four pillars of NATO`s COE program. Not a part of the NATO Command Structure or of other NATO entities, but forms part of the wider framework that contributes to the functioning of the Alliance. JAPCC Vision Be NATO’s catalyst for the improvement and transformation of Joint Air and Space Power; delivering effective solutions through independent thought and analysis. JAPCC Mission The JAPCC, as a team of multinational experts, is to provide key decision- makers effective solutions on Air and Space Power challenges, in order to safeguard NATO and the Nations’ interests.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0
    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
    [Show full text]