DOCSLIB.ORG

JAPCC) Is a NATO-Accredited Centre of Excellence Which Provides Support to NATO but Is Not Part of the NATO Command Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JAPCC) Is a NATO-Accredited Centre of Excellence Which Provides Support to NATO but Is Not Part of the NATO Command Structure Joint Air Power Competence Centre Space Branch Lt Col Henry Heren, USA Space Force J Royal Danish Defence College Space Webinar NATO‘s Take on Space as a Separate Operational Domain 23 November 2020 1 Disclaimer – The Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) is a NATO-accredited Centre of Excellence which provides support to NATO but is not part of the NATO Command Structure. – This briefing is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO and is designed to provide an independent position. – Personal and non-commercial use of this material is permitted. Permission to reprint/republish this material or to reuse any part of this work for any other purposes must be obtained from the Joint Air Power Competence Centre. – For permission and further information, please email us at [email protected]. Agenda • Organisation & Background • NATO Space Functional Areas • Military use of Space – the NATO perspective • Evolution of Space in NATO • Future Space Considerations Organization & Background Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) A NATO Centre of Excellence (COE) multi-nationally established and sponsored entity, which offers recognized expertise and experience Air & Space Power to the benefit of the Alliance within the four pillars of NATO`s COE program. Not a part of the NATO Command Structure or of other NATO entities, but forms part of the wider framework that contributes to the functioning of the Alliance. JAPCC Vision Be NATO’s catalyst for the improvement and transformation of Joint Air and Space Power; delivering effective solutions through independent thought and analysis. JAPCC Mission The JAPCC, as a team of multinational experts, is to provide key decision- makers effective solutions on Air and Space Power challenges, in order to safeguard NATO and the Nations’ interests. Lt Col Henry Heren NATO Space & Cyberspace Strategist assigned to the JAPCC. He is a Master Space Operator with operational and planning experience in the Pacific, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. After more than 28 years' service in the US Air Force, he transitioned to the US Space Force in October 2020. Space Functional Areas © NATO BiSCSpWG • PNT: location data in mobile telephones and automobiles, timing to enable financial transactions • ISR: Electro-Optical, Infrared, and Synthetic Aperture Radar Images • METOC: Global and exo-atmospheric weather data • SSA: Constellation status, orbit monitoring and collision avoidance • SATCOM: Global telecommunications • MD: Monitoring and Warning of potential missile threats to friends and allies Who is working in Space? Civilian Endeavors Military Operations Science & Commercial Space as Utility Space Operations Exploration Ventures Intelligence Space Launch European Space Danish Aerospace Agency (ESA) Company (Medical) Weather Space Domain Awareness / Space National Space SpaceX (Launch) Communications Situational Awareness Institute at the Technical University of Ikonos (Imagery) Position, Navigation, & Collision Avoidance Denmark (DTU Space) Timing INMARSAT Counter-Space National Aeronautics (Communications) and Space Electronic Warfare Administration (NASA) Military use of Space – the NATO perspective Key principles: • NATO is dependent on Space capabilities • NATO does not own Space-based assets – “NATO has no intention to put weapons into Space” • NATO owns and operates some ground-based assets • Space capabilities that contribute to NATO operations currently come from government, military, civilian and commercial providers • Allies retain full command and control over their assets Military Use of Space – the NATO Perspective Principles for Space: • Space-based capabilities enable NATO’s operations in all other domains (air, land, maritime and cyberspace) • Space provides data, products, and services to warfighters • The use of Space increases effectiveness and efficiency: . decreases the required resources . reduces of risk to personnel . reduces the time needed to achieve the desired end-state • Space Professionals plan and execute operations within the NATO Command Structure “No single NATO operation without Space” Military Use of Space – the NATO Perspective • The lack of Space Capabilities and products could hamper the ability of NATO to achieve its objectives Loss of Space-based assets does not mean that operations cannot be conducted, rather that the level of technical capability will be diminished to that of previous generations affecting military employment and tactics • NATO’s dependence on Space Systems implies the need to ensure that resources and capabilities are available during all operational phases • Opponents will try to deny NATO’s access to Space, while at the same time seeking to use their Space Capabilities to achieve their own objectives Timeline of the Evolution of “Space “in NATO • At the 2018 Brussels Summit, NATO Leaders recognised that space is a highly dynamic and rapidly evolving area, which is essential for the Alliance's security, and agreed to develop an overarching NATO Space Policy. • At the June 2019 Defence Ministers' meeting, Allies adopted NATO's Space Policy. • At the December 2019 Leaders' Meeting in London, Allies declared space a fifth operational domain, alongside air, land, sea and cyberspace. In their declaration, NATO Leaders stated: "We have declared space an operational domain for NATO, recognising its importance in keeping us safe and tackling security challenges, while upholding international law.“ • On 22 October 2020, Defence Ministers decided to establish a new NATO Space Centre at Allied Air Command in Ramstein, Germany. It will help to coordinate Allied space activities; support NATO missions and operations from space, including with communications and satellite imagery and protect Allied space systems by sharing information about potential threats. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_175419.htm? NATO Overarching Space Policy • High Level Framework for Guiding NATO’s approach to Space • Aim of the policy: . To guide NATO’s approach to Space, the opportunities and challenges • Main Outcomes: . NATO is not aiming to develop Space capabilities of its own . NATO is not aiming to become an autonomous Space actor . NATO still depends on national contributions “We can play an important role as a forum to share information, increase interoperability, and ensure that our missions and operations can call on the support they need.” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, 27 June 2019 Future Space Considerations • Should NATO define minimum requirements for the national level of contributions related to Space-based capabilities? • Should NATO develop Rules of Engagement for national operations in Space which support NATO operations? • Should NATO provide protection to contributing national Space Assets? If so, how does NATO go about accomplishing this? • Does NATO need/require additional Space-derived Data, Products, and Services? • Does ‘Space Support in Operations’ transition to ‘Operational Space Support’? • What are the personnel requirements for NATO Space Professionals? What are the education, training, and work experience requirements of those personnel? Review • Organisation & Background • NATO Space Functional Areas • Military use of Space – the NATO perspective • Evolution of Space in NATO • Future Space Considerations Thank you for your attention. www.japcc.org 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JAPCC Annual Report 2019
    2019 annual REPORT Joint Air Power Competence Centre Joint Air Power www.japcc.org Competence Centre Cover picture: Satellite: © ESA /AOES Medialab; Earth: © 2012 EUMETSAT; Background: © StarLine /shutterstock © This work is copyrighted. All Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von­Seydlitz­Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E­Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated Follow us on Social Media JAPCC | annual REPORT 2019 1 foreword Today, NATO Air Forces stand on the verge of the at the peer­to­peer level. We must use the lessons most meaningful transformation of technology and learned from this and other exercises to evolve our capability in our history, a transformation which con­ Alliance into a connected, Joint All Domain fighting tinues to be enabled in part by the independent force that is agile and capable of acting at speed that thought and analysis from the recognized air and future conflicts will require. I have great confidence space power experts in the Joint Air Power Compe­ that our Nations and our people will work closely with tence Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit-Urgent Priorities
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED ING TH LOW E 20 OL 16 F W R A E R W S O A W P R I S U A M T M N I I T O J URGENT PRIORITIES PRIORITIES URGENT UR ES GENT PRIORITI JOINT AIR POWER FOLLOWING THE 2016 WARSAW SUMMIT URGENT PRIORITIES Joint Air Power Competence Centre JOINT AIR POWER NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit – Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) HQ commis- sioned study conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). All copyright and intellectual property rights reside with HQ ACT, unless otherwise licensed. The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the position of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but are offered to foster dialogue and discussion re- garding urgent priorities in the field of air power capabilities and competencies. Though NATO classified documents may have informed the work of the authors, no clas- sified information has been directly quoted in this study, nor were any parts of classified information re-used in any form without prior sanitization.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017
    DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017 VOLUME 11A, CHAPTER 9 “SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by a (*) preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue and underlined font. The previous version dated May 2015 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added an overview section to comply with the Department of Defense (DoD) Financial Management Regulation (FMR) 090101 Addition Revision Standard Operating Procedures, dated June 15, 2015. 090201 Added definition for “DoD Component.” Addition 090202 Added definition for “Unified Combatant Command.” Addition Added a reference to the National Security Act of 1947 and 090204 Revision to the Joint Publication 1-02. 090206 Added definition for “Military Element.” Addition Added definition for a “Table of Organization and 090211 Addition Equipment.” Expanded the use of United States (U.S.) appropriated funds for U.S. military personnel who are members of an 090507.B.2. Addition international military headquarters that does not maintain a centralized international budget for such purposes. Added six North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Unit (NFIU) support elements at Tallinn, Table 9-1, Estonia; Riga, Latvia; Vilnius, Lithuania; Bydgoszcz, Addition paragraph A.4.f. Poland; Szekesfeharvar, Hungary; and Bratislava, Slovakia as approved by the NATO Defense Ministers on September 5, 2014. Moved from section A.2.g the Headquarters, Multinational Table 9-1, Division South-East at Bucharest, Romania and two NFIU Revision paragraph A.4.r.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 4 2016 Comp Troller
    OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -1100 JAN 4 2016 COMP TROLLER MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR, JOINT STAFF COMPTROLLER, UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND SUBJECT: Updates to Department ofDefense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 9, "Support oflnternational Military Activities" This memorandum updates the listing ofNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Units and Centers of Excellence, and their assigned administrative agent, as currently published in Table 9-1 ofVolume 11A, Chapter 9. These changes will be incorporated into the next chapter update planned for June 2016. Table 9-1, "International Military Headquarter and Related Agencies and Administrative Agents Responsible for Their Support and for Support to U.S. Elements" is revised to add as A.S.m the Center of Excellence- Energy Security (ESCOE) in Vilnius, Lithuania. This change was requested in Attachment 1. The Air Force will serve as the administrative agent. In addition, Table 9-1 is revised to add six new NATO Force Integration Units (NFIUs) with their associated administrative agents as follows: A.2.g.(1) NFIU Sofia, Bulgaria- Air Force; A.2.g.(2) NFIU Bucharest, Romania-Army; A.4.f.(1) NFIU Tallinn, Estonia-Navy; A.4.f.(2) NFIU Riga, Latvia- Navy; A.4.f.(3) NFIU Vilnius, Lithuania-Air Force; and A.4.f.(4) NFIU Bydgoszcz, Poland-Army. These changes were requested in Attachment 2. A draft update of Table 9-1 reflecting these changes is provided as Attachment 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0
    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Datalink
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED HEADQUARTERS ALLIED AIR COMMAND D-66877 RAMSTEIN-MIESENBACH, GERMANY Primary Location: Geilenkirchen, Germany NATO Body: HQ AIRCOM Schedule: Full-time Salary (Pay Basis): € 4,905.53 Euro Monthly Grade: NATO Grade G12 Clearance Level: CTS Contact Email – External: [email protected] Description The vacancy: Job Title: Principal Technician (Tactical Datalink) Post Number: OAC OCMX 0090 NATO Civilian Grade: NATO Grade 12 Duty Location: Geilenkirchen, Germany Post filling date: 1 May 2022 Closing date for applications: 7 September 2021 Organisation Summary and Post Context: Headquarters Allied Air Command (HQ AIRCOM) has been home to a NATO Airpower headquarters since 1974. Allied Air Command is the single service command for delivering Air and Space Power for Alliance Air operations and missions. The Operations Directorate is responsible for directing, monitoring and co-ordinating operational staff functions. The Operations Centre (OC) provides 24/7 command and control functionality and situational awareness to monitor and/or supervise the execution of standing peacetime operations and activities within COM AIRCOM’s Area of Functional Responsibility including Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD), Air Policing, NATO Airborne Early Warning & Control Force (NAEW&CF) coordination, and NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance Force (NAGSF) coordination. Within the OC, the Tactical Data Link Management (TDLM) Branch is responsible for all aspects of planning, designing, validating, initializing and continuously monitoring and managing the joint multi-link TDL architecture for the NATO Codification System (NCS) and its external interface. The TDLM Cell located at Geilenkirchen, Germany is an extension of the TDLM Branch at HQ AIRCOM in Ramstein, Germany. Based in Geilenkirchen Germany, the incumbent will provide on-site and remote technical support and training to ensure the appropriate utilization of tactical data links in support of training, exercise and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Air Command Achievements in 2015 ALLIED
    Allied Air Command Achievements in 2015 ALLIED Commander AIRCOM declared Full Operational Capability Scrambled over 400 Aircraft to safeguard NATO airspace AIR Conducted 3 successful Baltic Air Policing rotations involving 10 nations, 400 personnel and over 30 aircraft 24/7/365 interim NATO Ballistic Missile Defence COMMAND 24/7 operational control for NATO augmentation of Turkish Air Defence Prepared and executed 8 NATO exercises and supported NATO’s biggest LIVEX in over 13 yrs with 36,000 participants from 21 nations and over 3,000 sorties Executed NATO’s first vignette based exercise proving AIRCOM’s ability as a Joint HQ Deliver Air and Space Convened 2 Air Commanders’ Conferences and 2 NATO Air Chief Symposiums including 5 Partner Air Chief delegates Power for the Alliance Recognised with 8 SACEUR-level awards DACCC trained over 240 students and successfully deployed the DARS twice including once to the Baltic region CAOC Uedem declared Full Operational Capability, passed 4 no-notice verifications and executed 21 internal and external exercises CAOC Torrejon executed 22 external exercises, 8 internal exercises and 6 NATO evaluations Accomplished 2 Mobile Training Team missions to Partners Azerbaijan and Montenegro and 2 Air Expert Staff visits to Sweden and Finland Conducted 25 evaluations including 3 Operational Capability Concept Evaluation and Feedback events plus 7 Readiness Verifications Inspected infrastructure at 40 Airfields and Radar installations across 17 nations Accredited 2 new Air Ground Operations Schools. First NATO Forward Air Controller Capabilities accreditation of a PfP Nation, Sweden, and first Mobile Training Team to Azerbaijan Implemented Air Command and Control System and Air C2 Information Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower and Ground Armies : Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine
    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Airpower and ground armies : essays on the evolution of Anglo-American air doctrine. 1940- 1943/ editor, Daniel R Mortensen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Air power-Great Britain-History. 2. Air power-United States-History. 3. World War, 1939-1945- Aerial operations, British, 4. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial operations, American. 5. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Africa, North. 6. Operation Torch. I. Mortensen, Daniel R. UG635.G7A89 1998 358.4’03-dc21 97-46744 CIP Digitize December 2002 from 1998 Printing NOTE: Pagination changed Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................... i FORWARD........................................................................................................................ iii ABOUT THE EDITOR .......................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. vi GETTING TOGETHER ......................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • One Flank, One Threat, One Presence
    ONE FLANK, ONECenter for EuropeanTHREAT, Policy Analysis ONE PRESENCE A Strategy for NATO’s Eastern Flank LTG (Ret.) Ben Hodges Janusz Bugajski COL (Ret.) Ray Wojcik Carsten Schmiedl 2 May 2020 Center for European Policy Analysis All opinions are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the institutions they represent or the Center for European Policy Analysis. About CEPA The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) is a 501(c)(3), non-profit, non-partisan, public policy research institute. Our mission is to promote an economically vibrant, strategically secure, and politically free Europe with close and enduring ties to the United States. Our analytical team consists of the world’s leading experts on Central-East Europe, Russia, and its neighbors. Through cutting- edge research, analysis, and programs we provide fresh insight on energy, security, and defense to government officials and agencies; we help transatlantic businesses navigate changing strategic landscapes; and we build networks of future Atlanticist leaders. © 2020 by the Center for European Policy Analysis, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the Center for European Policy Analysis, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Center for European Policy Analysis 1275 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: [email protected] www.cepa.org Cover image: Standing NATO Maritime Group Two and Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Group Two in the Black Sea in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Landpower in NATO Vital for U.S
    Association of the United States Army Voice for the Army—Support for the Soldier October 2014 Strategic Landpower in NATO Vital for U.S. Security Allied Land Command is the leading advocate for soldiers and land forces in NATO, responsible for ensuring their effectiveness and interoperability. Lieutenant General Frederick B. Hodges, USA Commander, NATO Allied Land Command* Introduction Today’s global security environment is defined by its complexity, unpredictability and the increasing momentum of human interaction; it is the essence of the joint and combined force to remain trained and fully ready to meet any challenge. Strategic land- power—the application of land forces (Army, Marine Corps and special operations forces) toward achiev- ing strategic outcomes across the range of military operations—provides a critical hedge against this un- certain future. The role of strategic landpower is to shape and prevail within the human domain, creating conditions that stabilize people’s daily dealings with one another and generate momentum to bring about and combined-arms capabilities to dominate the en- the nation’s strategic objectives. vironment; and winning decisively when called. The Army is sustaining its commitment to maintain strong Even as the Department of Defense (DoD) rebal- relationships and interoperability with its proven ances its posture to the Asia–Pacific region, Europe partners in NATO. A large part of this effort is on- will continue to require a strong commitment from going by means of NATO’s Allied Land Command the United States, including responsive, adaptive and (LANDCOM). Established in 2012, it is the newest regionally engaged forces to maintain security and single-service command of NATO’s military arm and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence of the Baltic States
    Report Air Defence of the Baltic States | Sir Christopher Harper | Tony Lawrence | Sven Sakkov | M ay 2018 Title: Air Defence of the Baltic States Authors: Harper, Sir Christopher; Lawrence, Tony; Sakkov, Sven Publication date: May 2018 Category: Report Photo credit: Estonian Defence Forces (pildid.mil.ee) and TPS-77 MRR taken in Ventspils, Latvia during Site Acceptance Test, U.S. Army, 22nd mobile public affairs detachment Keywords: Air defence, air power, capability development, defence cooperation, Baltic states Disclaimer: The views and opinions contained in this report are those of its authors only and do not necessarily represent the positions of the International Centre for Defence and Security. As the work of an independent think tank, this report does not present positions or policies of the Estonian Gov- ernment. ISSN 2228-0529 ISBN 978-9949-7255-2-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-9949-7255-1-9 (PRINT) ©International Centre for Defence and Security 63/4 Narva Rd., 10152 Tallinn, Estonia [email protected], www.icds.ee Air Defence of the Baltic States I Foreword Europe currently faces the greatest set of external risks to its security since the end of the Cold War. Instability to our south requires our constant engagement and brings the challenges of migration and terrorism to our borders. Chapters that we had thought closed – such as Afghanistan and the Western Balkans – demand our renewed attention. To our east, a resurgent Russia is testing us on a range of fronts, and has reminded us once again that we need to be steadfast if we are to deter aggression and armed conflict on our continent.
    [Show full text]