DOCSLIB.ORG

National Transportation Safety Committee Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Transportation Safety Committee Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia 2012 FINAL KNKT.12.05.09.04 NNAATTIIOONNAALL TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN SSAAFFEETTYY CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company Sukhoi RRJ–95B; 97004 Mount Salak, West Java Republic of Indonesia 9 May 2012 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMITTEE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 2012 This Final report was produced by the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC), 3rd Floor Ministry of Transportation, Jalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the investigation carried out by the NTSC in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization, the Indonesian Aviation Act (UU No. 1/2009) and Government Regulation (PP No. 3/2001). Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, the NTSC reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As the NTSC believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging the NTSC as the source. When the NTSC makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the NTSC fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and recommendations is provided to promote aviation safety. In no case is it intended to imply blame or liability. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................i TABLE OF FIGURES ..........................................................................................................iv ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................v INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................ix 1 FACTUAL INFORMATION.........................................................................................1 1.1 History of the Flight...............................................................................................1 1.2 Injuries to Persons..................................................................................................3 1.3 Damage to Aircraft ................................................................................................3 1.4 Other Damage........................................................................................................3 1.5 Personnel Information ...........................................................................................3 1.5.1 Pilot in Command.....................................................................................3 1.5.2 Second in Command ................................................................................4 1.5.3 Navigator ..................................................................................................5 1.5.4 On-board Operator ...................................................................................5 1.5.5 Rest and Duty Period................................................................................6 1.5.6 ATC Controller at Jakarta APP ................................................................6 1.6 Aircraft Information...............................................................................................7 1.6.1 General .....................................................................................................7 1.6.2 Engines .....................................................................................................7 1.6.3 T2CAS ......................................................................................................8 1.6.3.1 Functional overview................................................................8 1.6.3.2 Some significant information quoted from the T2CAS manual.....................................................................................8 1.6.4 Flight Warning System...........................................................................11 1.6.5 Additional Aircraft Information .............................................................11 1.6.6 Additional Equipment On-board............................................................12 1.7 Meteorological Information.................................................................................12 1.7.1 Halim Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAFOR)....................................12 1.7.2 Weather Observation from Darmaga Station .........................................12 1.7.3 Satellite Image........................................................................................13 1.7.4 Weather Information Excerpt from the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) .....................................................................................................14 i 1.8 Aids to Navigation .............................................................................................. 14 1.8.1 General................................................................................................... 14 1.8.2 Radar Facilities ...................................................................................... 15 1.8.3 Relevant Navigation Charts ................................................................... 17 1.9 Communications ................................................................................................. 19 1.10 Aerodrome Information ...................................................................................... 21 1.11 Flight Recorders.................................................................................................. 23 1.11.1 Flight Data Recorder (FDR) .................................................................. 23 1.11.2 Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR)............................................................. 28 1.12 Wreckage and Impact Information...................................................................... 34 1.13 Medical and Pathological Information................................................................ 36 1.14 Fire ...................................................................................................................... 36 1.15 Survival Aspects.................................................................................................. 36 1.16 Tests and Research.............................................................................................. 37 1.17 Organizational and Management Information .................................................... 38 1.17.1 Aircraft Manufacturer ............................................................................ 38 1.17.2 Ground Handling Agency...................................................................... 39 1.17.3 Air Traffic Services Provider................................................................. 39 1.18 Additional Information........................................................................................ 39 1.18.1 Flight Planning and Coordination.......................................................... 39 1.19 Useful or Effective Investigation Techniques..................................................... 40 2 ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 41 2.1 Sequence of Events ............................................................................................. 41 2.2 Flight Preparation................................................................................................ 45 2.3 Flight Altitude ..................................................................................................... 45 2.4 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) ....................................................... 46 2.5 ATC Workload.................................................................................................... 46 2.6 Pilot Situational Awareness ................................................................................ 47 3 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 49 3.1 Findings............................................................................................................... 49 3.2 Factors................................................................................................................. 50 ii 4 SAFETY ACTION ........................................................................................................51 4.1 Indonesia Directorate General of Civil Aviation.................................................51 4.2 PT. Angkasa Pura II (Air Traffic Services Provider) ..........................................51 4.3 Sukhoi Civil Aviation Company of Russian Federation .....................................51 5 SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................53 5.1 Indonesia Directorate General of Civil Aviation.................................................53 5.2 Soekarno–Hatta International Airport .................................................................53 5.3 Interstate Aviation Committee of Russian Federation ........................................53 5.4 Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company of Russian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Blast from the Past: Soviet-Era Tu-160M2 Is More Lethal Than Ever
    50SKYSHADESImage not found or type unknown- aviation news BLAST FROM THE PAST: SOVIET-ERA TU-160M2 IS MORE LETHAL THAN EVER News / Manufacturer Image not found or type unknown Russia’s upgraded Tupolev Tu-160M2 Blackjack supersonic bomber is expected to make its first flight in 2019. Moscow currently has sixteen of the original version of the Mach 2.0-capable bomber, which are the last surviving examples of the thirty-five aircraft built by the Soviet Union before© 2015-2021 its 50SKYSHADES.COM demise. Moscow — Reproduction,hopes to copying,build fiftyor redistribution new Tu-160M2 for commercial aircraft purposes to is upgradeprohibited. its aging1 strategic bomber force. “I believe that in 2019 this plane, upgraded and manufactured, will make its maiden flight,” Col. Gen. Viktor Bondarev, commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces told the Moscow-based TASS News Agency on March 2. Russia made the decision to extend the development of the Tupolev PAK-DA in favor of the Tu- 160M2 in 2015. Serial production of the new Blackjack variant is expected to start in 2023. According to Russia’s deputy defense minister Yuri Borisov—as cited by TASS—the Tu-160M2 has been fundamentally upgraded with completely new mission systems and other improvements over the existing M variant. “This will be essentially a new airplane, not a Tu-160 but a Tu-160M2,” Borisov told RIA Novosti last year. Details on the exact nature of the Tu-160M2 upgrades are scarce. Presumably, Tupolev has made long-overdue adjustments to the airframe that were supposed to have been implemented during the Blackjack’s original production run.
    [Show full text]
  • Tupolev Tu-160: Soviet Strike Force Spearhead Free Ebook
    FREETUPOLEV TU-160: SOVIET STRIKE FORCE SPEARHEAD EBOOK Yefim Gordon,Dmitriy Komissarov | 288 pages | 28 Nov 2016 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780764352041 | English | Atglen, United States Tupolev Tu160: Soviet Strike Force Spearhead by Yefim Gordon, Dmitriy Komissarov Out of this effort came the first-designation Tu, a series of swing-wing designs, some clearly inspired by the Tu In , Tupolev OKB (with TsAGI oversight), proposed the TuM (first use designation), with two mission roles envisioned: missile strike with ASM's, and strategic reconnaissance. Tu supersonic strategic bomber (Nato reporting name of Blackjack) is a variable-sweep wing supersonic strategic missile carrier manufactured by the Tupolev aircraft research and engineering complex joint stock company of Moscow and the Kazan-Gorbunov Aircraft Production Association in Tatarstan from to Developed as the answer to the American B-1, the Tupolev Tu was the Soviet Union’s most potent strategic bomber. Several project versions were rejected, and a highly controversial contest involving some of the Soviet Union’s top-class aircraft design companies took place before the Tu variable-geometry bomber reached the hardware stage. Miscellaneous The performance of the Russian Tu is often compared with the US B-1B. Tu bomber upgrades. Kazan Aircraft Production Organisation (KAPO) was awarded a contract to upgrade the Russian Air Force’s 15 Tu bombers. The Tupolev upgrade package includes new targeting systems, upgraded cruise missiles and an electronic warfare suite. Buy Tupolev Tu Soviet
    [Show full text]
  • Communication for Empowerment Assessment Report: Indonesia
    Communication for Empowerment Assessment Report: Indonesia Content Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank AJI Aliansi Jurnalis Independen – Alliance of Independence Journalists AMAN Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara – Indigenous Peoples Alliance of Archipelago ARGP Asia Regional Governance Programme Asteki Asosiasi Televisi Kerakyatan Indonesia – Association of People Centered Television Indonesia ATVKI Asosiasi Televisi Komunitas Indonesia –Association of Community Television Indonesia BCG Boston Consulting Group BPS Biro Pusat Statistik - C4E Communications for Empowerment DPR Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat – Indonesian Legislative Body or Parliament FITRA Forum Indonesia untuk Transparansi Anggaran – Indonesian Forum for Budget Transparency FM Frequency Modulation FOI Freedom of Information GSM SIM card Global System for Mobile Communications Subscriber Identification Module card ICT Information and Communication Technology IDRD Institute of Dayakology for Research and Development ILO International Labour Organization ITE Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik – Information and Electronic Transaction KPI Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia – Indonesian Broadcasting Commission KR Kalimantan Review MNCTV Media Nusantara Citra Televisi NGO Non-governmental Organization PLN Perusahaan Listrik Negara – State Own Electricity Company PT Perseroan Terbatas – Limited Company PTPN Perseroan Terbatas Perkebunan Nusantara – Indonesian State Own Plantation Company Puskesmas Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat – Community Health Center RCTI Rajawali Citra Televisi Indonesia REDD
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Final Report
    An urgent conservation call from endemic plants of Mount Salak, West Java, Indonesia I Robiansyah* and S U Rakhmawati Research Center for Plant Conservation and Botanic Gardens - LIPI. Jl.Ir.H. Juanda 13 Bogor 16003, West Java, Indonesia *[email protected] Abstract. Mount Salak is part of Mount Halimun-Salak National Park in West Java, Indonesia. It is home to five endemic plant species that are very susceptible to human interference due to their close proximity to human settlements. The deforestation rate of the area was 1,473 ha or 1.3% of the total area each year. Using eleven line transects with a total length of 44.76 km, the present study aims at providing data on current population and conservation status of these five endemic plant species. The results showed that there was an urgent conservation call from Mount Salak as all five targeted species were unable to be located. Furthermore, two invasive species that might possess serious threat to the endemic plants were observed during the survey: markisa (Passiflora sp.; Passifloraceae) and harendong bulu (Clidemia hirta; Melastomataceae). Based on these results, the present study assigned all the endemic species as Critically Endangered according to the IUCN Red List Category and Criteria. To conserve all the endemic plant species in Mount Salak, several recommendations were given and discussed. 1. Introduction Plants are fundamental part of terrestrial ecosystem and provide support systems for life on earth. For human, plants provide many essential services that underpin human survival and well-being, such as source of food, clothes, timber, medicines, fresh air, clean water, and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL30730 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? November 8, 2000 Christopher Bolkcom Analyst in National Defense Ellen Schwarzler Research Associate Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress This CRS Report was prepared at the request of Representative James Talent. It has been released for general congressional use with his permission. Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? Summary There are many differences between the fighter aircraft industry in the United States and in Russia. The United States has traditionally produced its weaponry within a capitalist framework which allowed free enterprise and competition between companies in private industry. The former Soviet Union’s economy, and its fighter aircraft industry was based on a Marxist, command economy, where the central government dictated the type and number of aircraft produced and allocated resources for construction. Once among the most glamorous components of the Soviet military industrial complex, the Russian military aircraft industry has been described by some analysts as being on the verge of collapse. Russia’s civilian aircraft industry has faced similar pressures, which does not bode well for the military aviation infrastructure. It may be difficult for fighter aircraft companies to find employment in Russia’s beleaguered civil aircraft sector. The Russian government has attempted to reform its fighter aircraft industrial base and make it more efficient and competitive with western industry. It has initiated several reforms aimed at reducing the stratification and compartmentalization of industrial processes, as well as improving access to financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Piloted Evaluation of the Tupolev Tu-144 Supersonic Transport
    NASA / TM-2000-209850 A Qualitative Piloted Evaluation of the Tupolev Tu-144 Supersonic Transport Robert A. Rivers and E. Bruce Jackson Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia C. Gordon Fullerton and Timothy H. Cox Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California Norman H. Princen Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Long Beach, California February 2000 The NASA STI Program Office ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA Scientific and Technical papers from scientific and technical Information (STI) Program Office plays a key conferences, symposia, seminars, or other part in helping NASA maintain this important meetings sponsored or co-sponsored by role. NASA. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by Langley Research Center, the lead center for technical, or historical information from NASA's scientific and technical information. The NASA programs, projects, and missions, NASA STI Program Office provides access to the often concerned with subjects having NASA STI Database, the largest collection of substantial public interest. aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The Program Office is also NASA's institutional TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- mechanism for disseminating the results of its language translations of foreign scientific research and development activities. These and technical material pertinent to NASA's mission. results are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services that complement the STI Program Office's diverse offerings include TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of creating custom thesauri, building customized completed research or a major significant databases, organizing and publishing research phase of research that present the results of results ..
    [Show full text]
  • DCS: Su-27 Flanker Flight Manual
    [SU-27] DCS DCS: Su-27 Flanker Eagle Dynamics i Flight Manual DCS [SU-27] DCS: Su-27 for DCS World The Su-27, NATO codename Flanker, is one of the pillars of modern-day Russian combat aviation. Built to counter the American F-15 Eagle, the Flanker is a twin-engine, supersonic, highly manoeuvrable air superiority fighter. The Flanker is equally capable of engaging targets well beyond visual range as it is in a dogfight given its amazing slow speed and high angle attack manoeuvrability. Using its radar and stealthy infrared search and track system, the Flanker can employ a wide array of radar and infrared guided missiles. The Flanker also includes a helmet-mounted sight that allows you to simply look at a target to lock it up! In addition to its powerful air-to-air capabilities, the Flanker can also be armed with bombs and unguided rockets to fulfil a secondary ground attack role. Su-27 for DCS World focuses on ease of use without complicated cockpit interaction, significantly reducing the learning curve. As such, Su-27 for DCS World features keyboard and joystick cockpit commands with a focus on the most mission critical of cockpit systems. General discussion forum: http://forums.eagle.ru ii [SU-27] DCS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... VI SU-27 HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 2 ADVANCED FRONTLINE FIGHTER PROGRAMME .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tupolev Tu-104A Nickname “Brontosaurus” in Czechoslovakia
    TAH ARCHIVE TAH ESPITE THE HEAVY rain on Friday, New York that October, was chaired by Pan Am June 15, 1956, a Tupolev Tu-104 of the President Juan Trippe and was the first time Soviet Union’s state airline Aeroflot that Československé státní aerolinie (Czechoslovak landed safely on Runway 22 at State Airlines — ČSA) and Poland’s Polskie Linie Ruzynĕ Airport (now Václav Havel Lotnicze LOT had participated in the conference Airport)D in Prague, Czechoslovakia (now the since 1948. Czech Republic), with no need for the braking The Tu-104 represented a quantum leap in parachute. The aircraft, registered CCCP-L5413, technology and would bring challenges to the The had been produced in the manufacturer’s Kharkiv airlines bringing it into service. The new turbojet- OK-JET! factory and had made its maiden flight on powered airliner flew at speeds in excess of 560 December 30, 1955. The sleek new jetliner looked m.p.h. (900km/h) at 33,000ft (10,000m), requiring majestic and powerful, and quickly garnered the new techniques in numerous operational aspects, Tupolev Tu-104A nickname “Brontosaurus” in Czechoslovakia. including weather forecasting, the storage and The Tu-104, Nato reporting name Camel, distribution of kerosene (at that time a new type was essentially a civil derivative of the same of fuel), more precise radio navigation, the use company’s Tu-16 Badger bomber, the airliner of new airport equipment, the reinforcement in prototype making its maiden flight on June 17, and extension of existing airports and, last but Czechoslovakia 1955. Although Britain’s de Havilland D.H.106 not least, the development of onboard catering In November 1957 Czechoslovakian state airline ČSA entered the jet age when it took Comet had gained the crown as the world’s first services, which also saw a significant leap jet-powered aircraft to enter commercial service, in quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Short Courses Catalog
    AEROSPACE S HORT COU R S E S SPRING 2021 – SPRING 2022 Get ready for this year’s projects, refresh your knowledge and skills, earn a certificate and advance your career. Online Courses • Spring 2022 Schedule Free History of Airplane Design Webinars DEAR COLLEAGUES, LET OUR TEAM TRAIN travel costs and receive professional We hope this development uniquely tailored to YOUR TEAM ONLINE. message finds your team’s schedule and needs. you well. While You can learn where you work, take the last year has advantage of flexible delivery, train KU’sAerospaceShortCourse brought changes more people for less, or meet specific Programdeliversdependable and challenges, needs for small groups of employees. professionaltrainingwhere we know your need for KU Aerospace Short Courses stands youare.Trainasmallgroupor relevant, quality ready to meet your training needs, largeteamwithonlineshort professional training remains as whatever they may be. Whether coursesdeliveredrighttoyour necessary as ever. KU Aerospace you plan to attend a public course, organizationbyourexpert Short Courses remains committed want to register for a scheduled instructors.Selectthetopics to providing valuable, relevant course offering or engage your team professional development that meets in online learning right from their yourteamneedsmostandtake your needs. desks, visit our page at LPE.ku.edu/ advantageofflexiblescheduling aero-short-courses-home for a full thatreducestimeawayfrom Aerospace learning and instruction listing of available programs. work. is ongoing through a variety of platforms in 2021. In addition to our Rock Chalk, scheduled public courses this year in Why bring online learning to San Diego and Orlando, you can take your business? advantage of more online Aerospace Short Courses and free webinars than Sharon Graham •Competitivepricing ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Sukhoi's Fullback
    TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED Sukhoi Fullback by Dr Carlo Kopp While the region has seen the deployment and from the wide fuselage tunnel. As a result of this manufacture of hundreds of Flankers since the the aircraft’s effective wing loading is much lower early 1990s, all of these have been incremen- than that of aircraft with different configurations. tal developments of the baseline Su-27S and This is reflected in superb high alpha handling and Su-27UB tandem seat airframes. sustained turn rates. The enlarged LERX/canards Since the early 1980s the Sukhoi bureau has been migrated to a range of other Flanker variants, in- developing a family of derivative airframes, which cluding the Su-35, Su-37 and production Su-30MKI. utilise side by side seating. With ongoing industry Experience from initial Su-27K flight testing and speculation about regional buys of these aircraft, trials indicated that major issues would arise with this month’s analysis will explore the features, capa- training pilots for carrier recoveries. Without the bilities and growth potential of the Fullback family large range of aircraft types, and specialised carrier of Flanker derivatives. trainers operated by the US Navy, the Soviet AV-MF needed an aircraft which was identical in handling Sukhoi Su-27KUB to the basic Su-27K but dual seated, without the for- The navalised Su-27K for Korabl’ny was devel- ward visibility impediments of the existing tandem oped for the Project 1143.5 55,000 tonne class air- configuration Su-27UB. craft carrier, of which four were to have been built. Design of the dual navalised combat trainer de- The Su-27K is the Russian equivalent to the US Navy rivative began in 1989, the aim being to produce an F-14, but also important as it was the prototype for airframe suitable for a range of other carrier based design features which migrated to a wide range of roles such as reconnaissance, aerial refuelling, mari- other Flanker variants and derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth in the Governance of the Cold War Divide Mikoyan's
    Economic Growth in the Governance of the Cold War Divide Mikoyan’s Encounter with Japan, Summer 1961 ✣ Oscar Sanchez-Sibony Noguchi Yoshio had written to him after all. Anastas Mikoyan had been re- tired for ten years. The year was 1975, and to mark Mikoyan’s 80th birthday, Noguchi had sent the retired Soviet official a souvenir.1 He was not the only one to remember Mikoyan in his retirement. Writing in 1972 on the occasion of his oil company’s 60th anniversary, the redoubtable Idemitsu Sazo sent to Mikoyan—in the somewhat bewildered words of then-Soviet ambassador to Japan Oleg Troyanovskii—a “piece of cloth.”2 Matsubara Yosamatsu, presi- dent of the industrial and shipbuilding conglomerate Hitachi Zosen, chose a more personal note. In his letter, he recounted to Mikoyan the first time they met in August 1961 during Mikoyan’s tour of the corporation’s shipyard in Sakurajima, as well as their encounter a year later when Matsubara headed a delegation of Japanese businessmen in Moscow. “Ten years have passed since then,” he wistfully wrote to the Old Bolshevik. “And in that time, economic relations between our two countries strengthen with every year as trade rela- tions develop between our countries even more greatly.”3 Meanwhile, Prime Minister Sato Eisaku also recalled that fateful year, writing in his personal letter to Mikoyan: “I am sincerely glad that relations between Japan and the Soviet Union, especially after your visit to Japan in 1961, continue to develop 1. Mikoyan’s thank-you note dates from 1 December 1975 and is stored in Russian State Archive of Sociopolitical History (RGASPI), Fond (F.) 84, Opis’ (Op.) 3, Delo (D.) 108, List (L.) 43.
    [Show full text]