DOCSLIB.ORG

DCS: Su-27 Flanker Flight Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DCS: Su-27 Flanker Flight Manual [SU-27] DCS DCS: Su-27 Flanker Eagle Dynamics i Flight Manual DCS [SU-27] DCS: Su-27 for DCS World The Su-27, NATO codename Flanker, is one of the pillars of modern-day Russian combat aviation. Built to counter the American F-15 Eagle, the Flanker is a twin-engine, supersonic, highly manoeuvrable air superiority fighter. The Flanker is equally capable of engaging targets well beyond visual range as it is in a dogfight given its amazing slow speed and high angle attack manoeuvrability. Using its radar and stealthy infrared search and track system, the Flanker can employ a wide array of radar and infrared guided missiles. The Flanker also includes a helmet-mounted sight that allows you to simply look at a target to lock it up! In addition to its powerful air-to-air capabilities, the Flanker can also be armed with bombs and unguided rockets to fulfil a secondary ground attack role. Su-27 for DCS World focuses on ease of use without complicated cockpit interaction, significantly reducing the learning curve. As such, Su-27 for DCS World features keyboard and joystick cockpit commands with a focus on the most mission critical of cockpit systems. General discussion forum: http://forums.eagle.ru ii [SU-27] DCS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... VI SU-27 HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 2 ADVANCED FRONTLINE FIGHTER PROGRAMME .......................................................................... 2 FROM T-10 TO T-10S.......................................................................................................... 9 TESTING........................................................................................................................... 12 41 RECORDS OF THE SU-27 ................................................................................................. 15 IN SERVICE ....................................................................................................................... 16 GENERAL DESIGN ........................................................................................................ 19 DESIGN ............................................................................................................................ 20 SYSTEMS AND AVIONICS ..................................................................................................... 22 COCKPIT .......................................................................................................................... 23 GAME AVIONICS MODE .............................................................................................. 26 NAVIGATION MODE ........................................................................................................... 28 AIR TO AIR MODE ............................................................................................................. 29 COCKPIT INSTRUMENTS .............................................................................................. 31 Airspeed and Mach Indicator ................................................................................................................... 32 Pressure Altimeter ................................................................................................................................... 32 Radar Altimeter ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Mechanical Devices Indicator .................................................................................................................. 33 AoA Indicator and Accelerometer ............................................................................................................ 34 Attitude Direction Indicator ..................................................................................................................... 34 Horizontal Situation Indicator .................................................................................................................. 35 Vertical Velocity Indicator ........................................................................................................................ 36 Aircraft Clock ............................................................................................................................................ 36 Tachometer .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Fuel Quantity Indicator ............................................................................................................................ 37 Interstage Turbine Temperature Indicators ............................................................................................. 38 Head Down Display (HDD)........................................................................................................................ 38 Radar Warning System ............................................................................................................................. 39 PPD-SP Panel ............................................................................................................................................ 42 Direct control switch ................................................................................................................................ 42 Trimming Mechanism .............................................................................................................................. 43 Automatic Control System (ACS) .............................................................................................................. 44 Eagle Dynamics iii DCS [SU-27] SU-27 HUD AND HDD OPERATIONAL MODES ....................................................................... 47 Basic HUD symbols .................................................................................................................................... 47 Navigation Modes ..................................................................................................................................... 49 Beyond Visual Range Combat Modes ....................................................................................................... 50 Digital Datalink .......................................................................................................................................... 57 Work in Complicated Countermeasures Conditions ................................................................................. 58 Vertical Scanning - Close Combat Mode ................................................................................................... 60 BORE - Close Combat Mode ...................................................................................................................... 61 HELMET - Close Combat Mode ................................................................................................................. 61 Fi0 – Longitudinal Aiming Close Combat Mode......................................................................................... 62 Gun Employment ...................................................................................................................................... 63 Air-to-Ground Mode ................................................................................................................................. 65 Reticle ....................................................................................................................................................... 66 ELECTRONIC COUNTERMEASURES ......................................................................................... 68 Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) Stations of Su-27 .............................................................................. 68 SU-27 WEAPONS ......................................................................................................... 71 AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES ......................................................................................................... 71 SU-27 MISSILES ................................................................................................................ 73 R-27 (AA-10) Medium Range Missiles ....................................................................................................... 73 R-73 (AA-11) Short Range Missile ............................................................................................................. 76 AIR-TO SURFACE WEAPONS ................................................................................................ 80 Free-fall Bombs ......................................................................................................................................... 80 Unguided Aerial Rockets ........................................................................................................................... 84 RADIO COMMUNICATIONS AND MESSAGES ............................................................... 90 RADIO COMMANDS ........................................................................................................... 90 RADIO MESSAGES ............................................................................................................. 97 VOICE MESSAGES AND WARNINGS ..................................................................................... 100 THEORETICAL TRAINING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Committee Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia 2012
    FINAL KNKT.12.05.09.04 NNAATTIIOONNAALL TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN SSAAFFEETTYY CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company Sukhoi RRJ–95B; 97004 Mount Salak, West Java Republic of Indonesia 9 May 2012 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMITTEE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 2012 This Final report was produced by the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC), 3rd Floor Ministry of Transportation, Jalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the investigation carried out by the NTSC in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization, the Indonesian Aviation Act (UU No. 1/2009) and Government Regulation (PP No. 3/2001). Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, the NTSC reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As the NTSC believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging the NTSC as the source. When the NTSC makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the NTSC fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Ff 89/6 Copy
    $3 vol libre • free flight 6/89 Dec - Jan POTPOURRI SAC was informed by Sport Canada on the 10th of July that we are not eligible for funding for 1989-90 and until further notice. Thus we are now totally on our own. The average yearly grant from 1979 to 1988 in 1989 dollars was $14,000, or $16 per person. Perhaps it’s a good thing as planning in an atmosphere of doubt is not conducive to good health and efficient use of funds. The cutback was not unexpected and steps were taken early on to ease the effects of this loss of revenue. Imaginative planning in our small store and a good response from our members through the use of the “Soaring Stuff” inserts resulted in in- creased sales. We will also receive higher than projected invest- ment income essentially due to careful cash management and short-term interest rates, which have remained higher for longer than generally expected. In addition, a small gain in projected receipts from an unexpected increase in membership – now at 1423 – which is the first time since 1982 that we have passed 1400. Total expenditures should come in well below budget projection, primarily as a result of scaling back meetings and travel expenditures. On balance it seems fair to say that a combination of some tight fistedness on the expenditure side and a bit of luck on the revenue side will leave SAC in a financially stronger position than was expected at the beginning of the season, despite the cutting off of govern- ment funding.
    [Show full text]
  • A Presentation at the International Association of Students in Economic and Commercial Sciences, (AIESEC), St
    March 2013 from Alex Havard. View it in your browser. Dear Friend of HVLI, There have been a number of exciting developments since our November Newsletter. November: A presentation at the International Association of Students in Economic and Commercial Sciences, (AIESEC), St. Petersburg, Russia event. I gave a lecture in Saint Petersburg at the AIESEC event “You Lead 2012″ (a European Union University youth organization). This was a great opportunity to spread the Virtuous Leadership message to some 300 Russian students. The AIESEC network includes 86,000 members in 113 countries and territories. It is the largest student-run organization in the world, being present in over 2,400 universities across the globe. AIESEC is supported by over 8,000 partner organizations that look to AIESEC support in the development of talented individuals who are focused on personal growth. December: Leadership talks to the Nikea Publishing Company, Moscow, Russia. In December I gave a few Virtuous Leadership talks to the staff of the Nikea Company, which is the leading Orthodox Publisher in Russia. This was a Christian audience and we had a wonderful and constructive discussion about the last chapter of my book Virtuous Leadership. Nikea is located in the very heart of Moscow, right beside the Kremlin walls… Nikea is preparing a new Russian edition of both Virtuous Leadership and Created for Greatness. That will be a way to penetrate the hearts of Russian Orthodox believers. January: Virtuous Leadership seminar for Leroy Merlin, Moscow, Russia. I presented the first Virtuous Leadership seminar that I have given in French to the Russia-based Members of the Board of Leroy Merlin in Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • Vnesheconombank Group Sustainability Report
    Vnesheconombank Group Sustainability Report Vnesheconombank Group Sustainability Report 2013 VNESHECONOMBANK / Vnesheconombank Group Sustainability Report 2013 Contents About the Report ..............................................................................................................................................................................................4 Chairman’s Statement .................................................................................................................................................................................6 Vnesheconombank Group: Key Highlights ........................................................................................................................ 10 Highlights 2013 ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Vnesheconombank’s History ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 1. Vnesh econom bank’s Strategy ................................................................................................................................................. 16 1.1. Priority Business Lines ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2. Strategy Implementation. Sustainability Objectives
    [Show full text]
  • CONICYT Ranking Por Disciplina > Sub-Área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional De Investigación 1
    CONICYT Ranking por Disciplina > Sub-área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional de Investigación 1. Ciencias Naturales > 1.2 Computación y Ciencias de la Científica y Tecnológica Informática PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE USA Carnegie Mellon University 1 5,000 CHINA Tsinghua University 2 5,000 USA University of California Berkeley 3 5,000 USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 5,000 Nanyang Technological University & National Institute of Education SINGAPORE 5 5,000 (NIE) Singapore USA Stanford University 6 5,000 SWITZERLAND ETH Zurich 7 5,000 HONG KONG Chinese University of Hong Kong 8 5,000 FRANCE Universite Paris Saclay (ComUE) 9 5,000 INDIA Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System) 10 5,000 SINGAPORE National University of Singapore 11 5,000 USA University of Michigan 12 5,000 USA University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 13 5,000 GERMANY Technical University of Munich 14 5,000 CHINA Harbin Institute of Technology 15 5,000 CHINA Shanghai Jiao Tong University 16 5,000 USA Georgia Institute of Technology 17 5,000 UNITED KINGDOM University of Oxford 18 5,000 UNITED KINGDOM Imperial College London 19 5,000 CHINA Peking University 20 5,000 USA University of Southern California 21 5,000 USA University of Maryland College Park 22 5,000 CHINA Zhejiang University 23 5,000 USA University of Texas Austin 24 5,000 USA University of Washington Seattle 25 5,000 CHINA Huazhong University of Science & Technology 26 5,000 USA University of California San Diego 27 5,000 USA University of North Carolina Chapel Hill 28 5,000 HONG KONG
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Administration
    Advisory US.Depanment 01 Tronsporlolion Federal Aviation Circular Administration Subject: A HAZARD IN AEROBATICS: Date: 2/28/84 At No: 91-61 EFFECTS OF G-FORCES ON PILOTS Initiated by: AFO- 800 ; Change: AAM-500; AAC-100 1. PURPOSE. Because aerobatic flying subjects pilots to gravitational effects (G's) that can impair their ability to safely operate the aircraft, pilots who engage in aerobatics, or those who would take up such activity, should understand G's and some of their physiological effects. This circular provides background information on G's, their effect on the human body, and their role in safe flying. Suggestions are offered for avoiding problems caused by accelerations encountered in aerobatic maneuvers. 2. BACKGROUND. Aerobatic flying demands the best of both aircraft and pilot. The aircraft must be highly maneuverable, yet tolerant of G-loads. The pilot must possess skill and physiological stamina. He or she must be daring, yet mindful of the aircraft's limitations as well as his or her own. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular No. 91-48, "Acrobatics-Precision Flying with a Purpose," dated June 29, 1977, discusses some of the airworthiness and operational aspects of aerobatics, but does not consider biomedical factors. The most important of these biomedical factors is the pilot's response to accelerations (or G-loading). The major physiological effects of G-loaaing vary from reduced vision to loss of consciousness. The pilot who understands these effects will be better able to cope with them so that he or she can continue the sport of aerobatic flying. J.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL30730 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? November 8, 2000 Christopher Bolkcom Analyst in National Defense Ellen Schwarzler Research Associate Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress This CRS Report was prepared at the request of Representative James Talent. It has been released for general congressional use with his permission. Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? Summary There are many differences between the fighter aircraft industry in the United States and in Russia. The United States has traditionally produced its weaponry within a capitalist framework which allowed free enterprise and competition between companies in private industry. The former Soviet Union’s economy, and its fighter aircraft industry was based on a Marxist, command economy, where the central government dictated the type and number of aircraft produced and allocated resources for construction. Once among the most glamorous components of the Soviet military industrial complex, the Russian military aircraft industry has been described by some analysts as being on the verge of collapse. Russia’s civilian aircraft industry has faced similar pressures, which does not bode well for the military aviation infrastructure. It may be difficult for fighter aircraft companies to find employment in Russia’s beleaguered civil aircraft sector. The Russian government has attempted to reform its fighter aircraft industrial base and make it more efficient and competitive with western industry. It has initiated several reforms aimed at reducing the stratification and compartmentalization of industrial processes, as well as improving access to financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Stearman Aerobatics
    ( SFA'OUIFI" OCIOBEF1990 3 AEROBATICS U.S.NAVY Fep ntedlbm: U.S.NAVY PRIMARY FLIGHT TFAINING MANUAL 1 Juy, I945 NAVALAIF TRAINING COMMAND CHIEFOF NAVALAIB PRIMAFYIFAINING o sFA 'OUrFrr'. @TOAEB1990 5 AEROBATICS Import it Regsrdl6 oI sherhd o! not . part.llar manelver lsdecrib€d in th€ lollowlngp!s.i you aE to prc. Youare now !e.dy lor rhar shse in yrlr tEinlnsas a Nav.l dc. only thosemaneuveB d€m6nst6i.d .nd p@scdbedby Aviarlor rowad {hlch you have been lookins loMad wlrh you LndrucrorIn rh2 oda preserr€dby ih€ syllabus keenanricLp,rion, p€rhars nor unmix€dwih 5omeI€€tinqs ot AII .ercb.ric d|l be comDl.r..l !r lad 2,0lr0 f€€r missrvlns.Uk€ manybclore you, 9ou are piobably wondelhg sherhff or nor you can \ak€ i1" ai dre same6me |rboilng Tl ! L nor h.nated .ldtud€ trt .cr!.I .ldtude uider rhedelusionrhanh?maitolasood pilor b hcsktllh aeob.hca $e aE,e'. ol .ou6e. is rhai you qtn be .bl. to "rake ",bu|h? querion$ltbe lnethsornoryouon "h-ue I Yourel€ry b€ll lr sh@ld b. lan.ned snugly.bur mr b Ll" T@ rony c.d?a helore ylo hde (fie ro Ei.t in C r.se, rsh& d ro inrerl€e s h yor les @€m€nis. Ah. simplybea u.e rheyrs'e tanied aky" birthdr entolnenr ol ch4* rh€ shouldq h.66 aerob.rt and r d6n€ ro bercm€ aerbaric expds Tiey 2 Be €@ nor akn in l@kjns lor dhq airEft in your nesleded rh€ prc.kion ert iirrodlc€d i.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: RANCHO MURIETA, CA Accident Number: LAX88FA015 Date & Time: 10/15/1987, 1528 PDT Registration: N121FJ Aircraft: DASSAULT-BREGUET DA 10 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 3 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Positioning Analysis THE ACFT FLEW TO THE ARPT FOR A SALES DEMO FLT. THE CREW BOARDED THE ACFT AND TAXIED OUT FOR DEP. WITNESSES, INCLUDING TWO PLTS WITH AEROBATIC EXP, WATCHED THE ACFT DEP, MAKE A LEFT TRAFFIC PATTERN AND DO A LOW FLY-BY DOWN THE RWY. AT THE DEP END OF THE RWY, THE ACFT PITCHED UP INTO A STEEP CLIMB. AT 600 FT AGL, THE ACFT ENTERED A LEFT AILERON ROLL, WHICH THE WITNESSES SAID WAS 'SMOOTH, COORDINATED AND WITH THE NOSE ON THE POINT.' AT THE INVERTED POINT OF THE ROLL, THE ROLL CHANGED FROM AN AILERON TO A BARREL ROLL. ONE PILOT WITNESS SAID THAT IT APPEARED THE 'CREW LOST IT AT THE TOP' AND THAT THE CREW 'HELD THE BACK PRESSURE TOO LONG AT THE TOP.' AT THE 270 DEG POINT OF THE ROLL, THE ACFT WAS SEEN TO 'FALL OUT' OR 'DISH OUT' OF THE ROLL; IT RECOVERED TO WINGS LEVEL FLT AT ABOUT 100 FT AGL IN A VERY NOSE HIGH ATTITUDE SETTLING INTO THE GROUND WITH A HIGH VERTICAL DESCENT RATE. NO PREIMPACT ENG OR CONTROL SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS WERE FOUND. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: IN FLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL BY THE PILOT FLYING WHILE PERFORMING AN INTENTIONAL LOW LEVEL AEROBATIC MANEUVER.
    [Show full text]
  • Sportsman Sequence but Sequence
    SPORT MARCH 2011 OFFICIALFICIAL MAGAZINEMA NENE ofof thet INTERNATIONALN TION AEROBATIC CLUB • First Japanese How to Fly the Contest SPORTSMAN •Cheap Acro SEQUENCE Drive one. 2011 Ford Mustang All Legend, No Compromise The Privilege of Partnership The legendary 5.0L V8 returns to the Mustang GT, delivering 412 HP EAA members are eligible for special pricing on Ford Motor Company and 26 MPG. The 3.7L V6 boasts 305 HP and 31 MPG – new standards vehicles through Ford’s Partner Recognition Program. To learn more in the class! on this exclusive opportunity for EAA members to save on a new Ford vehicle, please visit www.eaa.org/ford. State-of-the-art technology includes: Twin-Independent Variable Cam Timing (Ti-VCT), SYNC in-car connectivity, and AdvanceTrac electronic stability control. VEHICLE PURCHASE PLAN OFFICIAL MAGAZINE of the INTERNATIONAL AEROBATIC CLUB Vol. 40 No.3 March 2011 A PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL AEROBATIC CLUB CONTENTS “Somebody said, “Well, they met a black bear when they were making the corner markers. Maybe it’s true. ” Yuichi Tagaki FEATURES 06 Flying the 2011 Sportsman Known John Morrisey 18 Full Circle Dave Watson 22 Cheap Acro Will Tyron 28 Japan’s First Contest Cutting acro out of the jungle Yuichi Takagi COLUMNS 03 / President’s Page Doug Bartlett DEPARTMENTS 02 / Letter From the Editor 04 / Sun ‘n Fun Speakers 26 / 2010 Regional Results THE COVER 30 / Contest Calendar and Advertisers Index Photo by Laurie Zaleski. 31 / FlyMart and Classifieds PHOTOGRAPHY COURTESY YUICHI TAGAKI REGGIE PAULK COMMENTARY / EDITOR’S LOG OFFICIAL MAGAZINE of the INTERNATIONAL AEROBATIC CLUB PUBLISHER: Doug Bartlett IAC MANAGER: Trish Deimer EDITOR: Reggie Paulk SENIOR ART DIRECTOR: Phil Norton DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: Mary Jones COPY EDITOR: Colleen Walsh CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Doug Bartlett John Morrissey Reggie Paulk Yuichi Tagaki Will Tyron Dave Watson IAC CORRESPONDENCE International Aerobatic Club, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Sukhoi's Fullback
    TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED Sukhoi Fullback by Dr Carlo Kopp While the region has seen the deployment and from the wide fuselage tunnel. As a result of this manufacture of hundreds of Flankers since the the aircraft’s effective wing loading is much lower early 1990s, all of these have been incremen- than that of aircraft with different configurations. tal developments of the baseline Su-27S and This is reflected in superb high alpha handling and Su-27UB tandem seat airframes. sustained turn rates. The enlarged LERX/canards Since the early 1980s the Sukhoi bureau has been migrated to a range of other Flanker variants, in- developing a family of derivative airframes, which cluding the Su-35, Su-37 and production Su-30MKI. utilise side by side seating. With ongoing industry Experience from initial Su-27K flight testing and speculation about regional buys of these aircraft, trials indicated that major issues would arise with this month’s analysis will explore the features, capa- training pilots for carrier recoveries. Without the bilities and growth potential of the Fullback family large range of aircraft types, and specialised carrier of Flanker derivatives. trainers operated by the US Navy, the Soviet AV-MF needed an aircraft which was identical in handling Sukhoi Su-27KUB to the basic Su-27K but dual seated, without the for- The navalised Su-27K for Korabl’ny was devel- ward visibility impediments of the existing tandem oped for the Project 1143.5 55,000 tonne class air- configuration Su-27UB. craft carrier, of which four were to have been built. Design of the dual navalised combat trainer de- The Su-27K is the Russian equivalent to the US Navy rivative began in 1989, the aim being to produce an F-14, but also important as it was the prototype for airframe suitable for a range of other carrier based design features which migrated to a wide range of roles such as reconnaissance, aerial refuelling, mari- other Flanker variants and derivatives.
    [Show full text]