DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 6 Basics of Magnetostatics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 6 Basics of Magnetostatics Lecture 6 Basics of Magnetostatics Today’s topics 1. New topic – magnetostatics 2. Present a parallel development as we did for electrostatics 3. Derive basic relations from a fundamental force law 4. Derive the analogs of E and G 5. Derive the analog of Gauss’ theorem 6. Derive the integral formulation of magnetostatics 7. Derive the differential form of magnetostatics 8. A few simple problems General comments 1. What is magnetostatics? The study of DC magnetic fields that arise from the motion of charged particles. 2. Since charged particles are present, does this mean we also must have an electric field? No!! Electrons can flow through ions in such a way that current flows but there is still no net charge, and hence no electric field. This is the situation in magnetostatics 3. Magnetostatics is more complicated than electrostatics. 4. Single magnetic charges do not exist in nature. The simplest basic element in magnetostatics is the magnetic dipole, which is equivalent to two, closely paired equal and opposite charges in electrostatics. In magnetostatics the dipole forms from a small circular loop of current. 5. Magnetic geometries are also more complicated than in electrostatics. The vector nature of the magnetic field is less intuitive. 1 The basic force of magnetostatics 1. Recall electrostatics. qq rr = 12 1 2 F12 3 4QF0 rr12 2. In magnetostatics there is an equivalent empirical law which we take as a postulate qq vv×× ¯( rr ) = 12N 0 1212¢± F12 3 4Q rr12 3. The force is proportional to 1/r 2 . = 4. The force is perpendicular to v1 : Fv12¸ 1 0 . 5. The force depends on the particle velocities vv12, =×7 Henry s meter 6. The constant of proportionality is equal to NQ0 410 '/ . The magnetic field 1. We define the magnetic field in terms of the force as follows 2 qq rr = 12 1 2 q Electrostatics FE123 w 1 4QF0 rr11 q rr = 212 E 3 4QF0 rr11 qq vv×× ¯() rr = N012 1212¢±q × Magnetostatics Fv123 w 1 1 B 4Q rr12 q vrr×() = N02 212 B 3 4Q r1 r2 2. Let’s extend the definition to include many charges q jjrr Electrostatics Er()= 3 j 4QF0 rr j × N q j vrrjj() Magnetostatics Br()= 0 3 j 4Q rr j 3. Let’s extend the analysis to a continuum qd Electrostatics j l S ra j ¨ 1 rr a Er()= d ra ¨ S 3 4QF0 rr a qd= d Magnetostatics jjvvrJ l S aar j ¨¨ Jv==S current density in Amps/m2 Jr()aa× ( r r ) ()= N0 d Br3 ra 4Q ¨ rr a 4. Now, recall that rr a = 11=+ 3 a rr a rraa rr 5. This allows us to introduce the vector potential A 3 1 rr a Electrostatics Er()= d ra ¨ S 3 4QF0 rr a 11 = ¨ S dra 4QF0 rr a 11 = ¨ S dra 4QF0 rr a = G 11 GS= ¨ dra 4QF0 rr a Jr()aa× ( r r ) ()= N0 d Magnetostatics Br3 ra 4Q ¨ rr a N 1 = 0 J()rraa× d 4Q ¨ rr a N Jr()a = 0 × dra 4Q ¨ rr a N Jr()a = × 0 dra 4Q ¨ rr a = ×A N Jr()a Ar= 0 d a 4Q ¨ rr a 6. A is the vector potential and the integral expression for A is known as the Biot- Savart law. 7. A basic property of magnetostatics Electrostatics EE= G l ×=0 Magnetostatics BA= × l¸ B= 0 A new relation – conservation of charge 1. A basic physical property is that charge is conserved. It cannot be created or destroyed. 2. This implies a relation between S and J . 3. Let’s derive this relation for a simple 1-D case 4 4. Statement of charge conservation Rate of increase of charge = flow in of charge flow out of charge (1) = (2) (3) 5. The separate terms are as follows ssS (1) = ()S%%%xyz= %%% xyz sstt =×vyz (2) flux of charge area = S %% xx% /2 =×vyz (3) flux of charge area = S %% xx+% /2 6. Recall that SvJ= = current density . The conservation law becomes xyzsS = yz v v %%% %%()SSxx xx+ st % /2% /2 = yzJ() J %%xxxx% /2 xx+% /2 ¬Jx Jx yzJx() s%xx Jx() s% x% % xx ­ ® ssxx22­ sJx = %xyz % % sx 7. Therefore, in 1-D ssS J x +=0 sstx 8. In 3-D 5 J ssS JJxzs y s +++=0 sstx s y s z sS + ¸J = 0 st 9. Note, in electrostatics conservation of charge implies ssS / t = 0 . This is a trivial result since we are looking at static situations with no time variation 10. However, in magnetostatics conservation of charge implies that ¸J = 0. The current is divergence free for static problems. 11. This implies something about ¸A as follows N J(ra) Ar= 0 d a 4Q ¨ rr a N Jr()a ¸Ar= 0 ¸ d a 4Q ¨ rr a N ¯Jr()a 1 = 0 ¡°aaaa ¸ + ¸Jr()d r 4 ¨ ¡°rraa rr Q ¢±¡° N Jr()a = ¸0 aadr 4Q ¨ rr a N nJaa¸ ()S = 0 dSa 4Q ¨ rr a ==0 for a localized current distribution: J()SSaa0 as ld ¸A = 0 The analog of Poisson’s equation 1. In electrostatics we have E = G 2 = GS / F0 2. In magnetostatics 6 N J()ra Ar= 0 d a 4Q ¨ rr a N 1 22AJrr= 0 ()aa d 4Q ¨ rr a N = 0 J()rrraa4QE ( )dra 4Q ¨ 2 = AJN0 3. This is the equivalent to Poisson’s equation. 4. Also, we find that ×=BA×()× = ¸()AA 2 = 2A ×= BJN0 5. This is Ampere’s law for magnetostatics. 6. We can now easily obtain the integral formulation of magnetostatics. First equation. ¨¨¸Brdd= 0 l¸ nBS = 0 VS 7. Second equation. ( × BJn) dS= 0 Bl d= Jn dS ¨¨ ¸NN00l¸v ¨ ¸ SCS 7 Summary and comparison Magnetostatics Electrostatics N Jr()aa1 S() r Integral relation Ar==0 ¨¨ddaaG r 44QQFrraa0 rr Differential formulation BA= × E = G 22= = AJNGSF00 / Integral formulation ¨¨nB¸ dS= 0 v E¸ d l= 0 ¨¨v Bl¸ddSdSd= Jn¸¸ ¨ nE= ¨S r qqEvB× Force density FEF==S = =× JB %%rr Example 1 1. Find the magnetic field in a long solenoid. 2. By symmetry there is only a z component of field: Be= Bzz 3. With no sources at infinity Bz must vanish outside the coil: Brz =>0 for a . () 4. By symmetry Brzz(),,R z= Br 5. Inside the solenoid ×= BJN0 sBz = N J = 0 sr 0 R 6. The solution is B== B const z 0 . B I 7. Express0 in terms the current flowing in the wire by using Amperes law. 8 Bldd= JS ¨¨v ¸ N0 ¸ BL= NI 00N 8. Therefore, inside a long solenoid the field is uniform with a value NI B = N0 0 L Example 2 1. Find the field inside a torus. 2. By symmetry we see that ss/0G = = B 3. The only non-zero field component is BeGG. B = 4. As in the straight solenoid G 0 outside the torus. 5. Inside the torus we have ×= BJN0 1 sRB G = 0 RRs 6. The solution is K B = G R 9 7. Express K in terms of the coil current by using the integral form of Ampere’s law Bldd= JnS ¨¨v ¸ N0 ¸ RB= NI 2QNG 0 8. This gives NI BR()= N0 G 2QR Example 3 1. Find the field due to the current flowing in a loop of wire 2. This problem is more complicated than you would think. Proceed as follows. 3. Since there are no conductors and the current is localized it makes sense to start with the Biot-Savart law N J()ra Ar= 0 d a 4Q ¨ rr a 4. Note that the current density is given by 10 ( ) = IR( a) ( Z) J reaaaEE G ¨¨Jn¸ dSaaaaa= IEE()() R a Z dR dZ= I 5. One tricky problem is that eeGa v G . As we integrate around the loop the direction of eGa is constantly changing while at the fixed observation point eG does not change. 6. This difficulty is avoided by expressing the unit vectors in rectangular coordinates which always stay fixed. Thus, = + eeG sinGGxy cos e = + eeGa sinGGaaxy cos e 7. The Biot-Savart law becomes Ae=+AAxx yy e J N aae = 0 GGdra 4Q ¨ rr a J ()+ N a sinGGaaeexy cos = 0 G dra 4Q ¨ rr a 8. We see that I ()()()Raaaa Z sin N0 EE G Adx = ra 4Q ¨ rr a I ()()()Raaaa Zcos N0 EE G Ady = ra 4Q ¨ rr a 11 AAA()= + 9. The next step is to combine these terms to evaluate G r xysinGG cos at the observation point. N I EE(Raaa ) ( Z) Ad=+0 ()cosGG cosaa sin GG sin ra G 4Q ¨ rr a N I EE()()()Raaaa Zcos GG = 0 dra 4Q ¨ rr a 10. To evaluate this integral note that 2221/2 rr aa= ¯()()()xx + yy a + zz a ¢±¡° 222 1/2 = ¯()()(RRaacosGG cos+ RR aa sin GG sin + ZZ a ) ¢±¡° 2 1/2 =+ ¯RR22aaaa2cos RR()()GG+ ZZ ¢±¡° 11. We can now carry out the integration over RZaa, . N I EE(Raaaa) ( Z)cos( GG) A= 0 Raaaa dR dZ dG G 4Q ¨ rr a Ia cos()GGa = N0 d 1/2 Ga 4Q ¨ ¯Ra22+ 2cos Ra( a ) + Z 2 ¢±¡°GG 12. This integral can be evaluated in terms of the complete elliptic integrals Kk( ), Ek( ) . This does not provide too much insight. 13. A more useful approach is to evaluate the integrals far from the loop of wire. 14. As shown below we let Rr==sinR Zr cosR and assume ra . 12 15. In this limit 11= 1/2 1/2 ¯ Ra22+ 2cos Ra()aa++ Z 2 ra 22 2sincos ra ()¯ ¢±¢¡°¡GG R GG±° 1 ¯a x¡°1sincosRGG()a rr¢±¡° 16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrostatics Vs Magnetostatics Electrostatics Magnetostatics
    Electrostatics vs Magnetostatics Electrostatics Magnetostatics Stationary charges ⇒ Constant Electric Field Steady currents ⇒ Constant Magnetic Field Coulomb’s Law Biot-Savart’s Law 1 ̂ ̂ 4 4 (Inverse Square Law) (Inverse Square Law) Electric field is the negative gradient of the Magnetic field is the curl of magnetic vector electric scalar potential. potential. 1 ′ ′ ′ ′ 4 |′| 4 |′| Electric Scalar Potential Magnetic Vector Potential Three Poisson’s equations for solving Poisson’s equation for solving electric scalar magnetic vector potential potential. Discrete 2 Physical Dipole ′′′ Continuous Magnetic Dipole Moment Electric Dipole Moment 1 1 1 3 ∙̂̂ 3 ∙̂̂ 4 4 Electric field cause by an electric dipole Magnetic field cause by a magnetic dipole Torque on an electric dipole Torque on a magnetic dipole ∙ ∙ Electric force on an electric dipole Magnetic force on a magnetic dipole ∙ ∙ Electric Potential Energy Magnetic Potential Energy of an electric dipole of a magnetic dipole Electric Dipole Moment per unit volume Magnetic Dipole Moment per unit volume (Polarisation) (Magnetisation) ∙ Volume Bound Charge Density Volume Bound Current Density ∙ Surface Bound Charge Density Surface Bound Current Density Volume Charge Density Volume Current Density Net , Free , Bound Net , Free , Bound Volume Charge Volume Current Net , Free , Bound Net ,Free , Bound 1 = Electric field = Magnetic field = Electric Displacement = Auxiliary
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Electrostatics and Magenetostatics
    Review of electrostatics and magenetostatics January 12, 2016 1 Electrostatics 1.1 Coulomb’s law and the electric field Starting from Coulomb’s law for the force produced by a charge Q at the origin on a charge q at x, qQ F (x) = 2 x^ 4π0 jxj where x^ is a unit vector pointing from Q toward q. We may generalize this to let the source charge Q be at an arbitrary postion x0 by writing the distance between the charges as jx − x0j and the unit vector from Qto q as x − x0 jx − x0j Then Coulomb’s law becomes qQ x − x0 x − x0 F (x) = 2 0 4π0 jx − xij jx − x j Define the electric field as the force per unit charge at any given position, F (x) E (x) ≡ q Q x − x0 = 3 4π0 jx − x0j We think of the electric field as existing at each point in space, so that any charge q placed at x experiences a force qE (x). Since Coulomb’s law is linear in the charges, the electric field for multiple charges is just the sum of the fields from each, n X qi x − xi E (x) = 4π 3 i=1 0 jx − xij Knowing the electric field is equivalent to knowing Coulomb’s law. To formulate the equivalent of Coulomb’s law for a continuous distribution of charge, we introduce the charge density, ρ (x). We can define this as the total charge per unit volume for a volume centered at the position x, in the limit as the volume becomes “small”.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Boundary Conditions 1/6
    11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 1/6 Magnetic Boundary Conditions Consider the interface between two different materials with dissimilar permeabilities: HB11(r,) (r) µ1 HB22(r,) (r) µ2 Say that a magnetic field and a magnetic flux density is present in both regions. Q: How are the fields in dielectric region 1 (i.e., HB11()rr, ()) related to the fields in region 2 (i.e., HB22()rr, ())? A: They must satisfy the magnetic boundary conditions ! Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 2/6 First, let’s write the fields at the interface in terms of their normal (e.g.,Hn ()r ) and tangential (e.g.,Ht (r ) ) vector components: H r = H r + H r H1n ()r 1 ( ) 1t ( ) 1n () ˆan µ 1 H1t (r ) H2t (r ) H2n ()r H2 (r ) = H2t (r ) + H2n ()r µ 2 Our first boundary condition states that the tangential component of the magnetic field is continuous across a boundary. In other words: HH12tb(rr) = tb( ) where rb denotes to any point along the interface (e.g., material boundary). Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 3/6 The tangential component of the magnetic field on one side of the material boundary is equal to the tangential component on the other side ! We can likewise consider the magnetic flux densities on the material interface in terms of their normal and tangential components: BHrr= µ B1n ()r 111( ) ( ) ˆan µ 1 B1t (r ) B2t (r ) B2n ()r BH222(rr) = µ ( ) µ2 The second magnetic boundary condition states that the normal vector component of the magnetic flux density is continuous across the material boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetostatics: Part 1 We Present Magnetostatics in Comparison with Electrostatics
    Magnetostatics: Part 1 We present magnetostatics in comparison with electrostatics. Sources of the fields: Electric field E: Coulomb’s law Magnetic field B: Biot-Savart law Forces exerted by the fields: Electric: F = qE Mind the notations, both Magnetic: F = qvB printed and hand‐written Does the magnetic force do any work to the charge? F B, F v Positive charge moving at v B Negative charge moving at v B Steady state: E = vB By measuring the polarity of the induced voltage, we can determine the sign of the moving charge. If the moving charge carriers is in a perfect conductor, then we can have an electric field inside the perfect conductor. Does this contradict what we have learned in electrostatics? Notice that the direction of the magnetic force is the same for both positive and negative charge carriers. Magnetic force on a current carrying wire The magnetic force is in the same direction regardless of the charge carrier sign. If the charge carrier is negative Carrier density Charge of each carrier For a small piece of the wire dl scalar Notice that v // dl A current-carrying wire in an external magnetic field feels the force exerted by the field. If the wire is not fixed, it will be moved by the magnetic force. Some work must be done. Does this contradict what we just said? For a wire from point A to point B, For a wire loop, If B is a constant all along the loop, because Let’s look at a rectangular wire loop in a uniform magnetic field B.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Ferrofluid Passive Cooling System
    Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010 Boston Modeling of Ferrofluid Passive Cooling System Mengfei Yang*,1,2, Robert O’Handley2 and Zhao Fang2,3 1M.I.T., 2Ferro Solutions, Inc, 3Penn. State Univ. *500 Memorial Dr, Cambridge, MA 02139, [email protected] Abstract: The simplicity of a ferrofluid-based was to develop a model that supports results passive cooling system makes it an appealing from experiments conducted on a cylindrical option for devices with limited space or other container of ferrofluid with a heat source and physical constraints. The cooling system sink [Figure 1]. consists of a permanent magnet and a ferrofluid. The experiments involved changing the Ferrofluids are composed of nanoscale volume of the ferrofluid and moving the magnet ferromagnetic particles with a temperature- to different positions outside the ferrofluid dependant magnetization suspended in a liquid container. These experiments tested 1) the effect solvent. The cool, magnetic ferrofluid near the of bringing the heat source and heat sink closer heat sink is attracted toward a magnet positioned together and using less ferrofluid, and 2) the near the heat source, thereby displacing the hot, optimal position for the permanent magnet paramagnetic ferrofluid near the heat source and between the heat source and sink. In the model, setting up convective cooling. This paper temperature-dependent magnetic properties were explores how COMSOL Multiphysics can be incorporated into the force component of the used to model a simple cylinder representation of momentum equation, which was coupled to the such a cooling system. Numerical results from heat transfer module. The model was compared the model displayed the same trends as empirical with experimental results for steady-state data from experiments conducted on the cylinder temperature trends and for appropriate velocity cooling system.
    [Show full text]
  • We Continue to Compare the Electrostatic and Magnetostatic Fields. the Electrostatic Field Is Conservative
    We continue to compare the electrostatic and magnetostatic fields. The electrostatic field is conservative: This allows us to define the potential V: dl because a b is independent of the path. If a vector field has no curl (i.e., is conservative), it must be something's gradient. Gravity is conservative. Therefore you do see water flowing in such a loop without a pump in the physical world. For the magnetic field, If a vector field has no divergence (i.e., is solenoidal), it must be something's curl. In other words, the curl of a vector field has zero divergence. Let’s use another physical context to help you understand this math: Ampère’s law J ds 0 Kirchhoff's current law (KCL) S Since , we can define a vector field A such that Notice that for a given B, A is not unique. For example, if then , because Similarly, for the electrostatic field, the scalar potential V is not unique: If then You have the freedom to choose the reference (Ampère’s law) Going through the math, you will get Here is what means: Just notation. Notice that is a vector. Still remember what means for a scalar field? From a previous lecture: Recall that the choice for A is not unique. It turns out that we can always choose A such that (Ampère’s law) The choice for A is not unique. We choose A such that Here is what means: Notice that is a vector. Thus this is actually three equations: Recall the definition of for a scalar field from a previous lecture: Poisson’s equation for the magnetic field is actually three equations: Compare Poisson’s equation for the magnetic field with that for the electrostatic field: Given J, you can solve A, from which you get B by Given , you can solve V, from which you get E by Exams (Test 2 & Final) problems will not involve the vector potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 6
    Classical electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 6 Classical electromagnetism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Classical electrodynamics) Classical electromagnetism (or classical electrodynamics ) is a Electromagnetism branch of theoretical physics that studies consequences of the electromagnetic forces between electric charges and currents. It provides an excellent description of electromagnetic phenomena whenever the relevant length scales and field strengths are large enough that quantum mechanical effects are negligible (see quantum electrodynamics). Fundamental physical aspects of classical electrodynamics are presented e.g. by Feynman, Electricity · Magnetism Leighton and Sands, [1] Panofsky and Phillips, [2] and Jackson. [3] Electrostatics Electric charge · Coulomb's law · The theory of electromagnetism was developed over the course of the 19th century, most prominently by James Clerk Maxwell. For Electric field · Electric flux · a detailed historical account, consult Pauli, [4] Whittaker, [5] and Gauss's law · Electric potential · Pais. [6] See also History of optics, History of electromagnetism Electrostatic induction · and Maxwell's equations . Electric dipole moment · Polarization density Ribari č and Šušteršič[7] considered a dozen open questions in the current understanding of classical electrodynamics; to this end Magnetostatics they studied and cited about 240 references from 1903 to 1989. Ampère's law · Electric current · The outstanding problem with classical electrodynamics, as stated Magnetic field · Magnetization · [3] by Jackson, is that we are able to obtain and study relevant Magnetic flux · Biot–Savart law · solutions of its basic equations only in two limiting cases: »... one in which the sources of charges and currents are specified and the Magnetic dipole moment · resulting electromagnetic fields are calculated, and the other in Gauss's law for magnetism which external electromagnetic fields are specified and the Electrodynamics motion of charged particles or currents is calculated..
    [Show full text]
  • Fields, Units, Magnetostatics
    Fields, Units, Magnetostatics European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected]) Institut N´eelCNRS-Universit´eGrenoble Alpes 10 octobre 2017 European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Motivation Magnetism is around us and magnetic materials are widely used Magnet Attraction (coins, fridge) Contactless Force (hand) Repulsive Force : Levitation Magnetic Energy - Mechanical Energy (Magnetic Gun) Magnetic Energy - Electrical Energy (Induction) Magnetic Liquids A device full of magnetic materials : the Hard Disk drive European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics reminders Flat Disk Rotary Motor Write Head Voice Coil Linear Motor Read Head Discrete Components : Transformer Filter Inductor European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics How to describe Magnetic Matter ? How Magnetic Materials impact field maps, forces ? How to model them ? Here macroscopic, continous model Next lectures : Atomic magnetism, microscopic details (exchange mechanisms, spin-orbit, crystal field ...) European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics w/o magnets : Reminder Up to 1820, magnetism and electricity were two subjects not experimentally connected H.C. Oersted experiment (1820 - Copenhagen) European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics induction field B Looking for a mathematical expression Fields and forces created by an electrical circuit (C1, I) Elementary dB~ induction field created at M ~ ~ µ0I dl^u~ Biot and Savart law (1820) dB(M) = 4πr 2 European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics : Vocabulary µ I dl~ ^ u~ dB~ (M) = 0 4πr 2 B~ is the magnetic induction field ~ 1 1 B is a long-range vector field ( r 2 becomes r 3 for a closed circuit).
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap on Transformation Optics 5 Martin Mccall 1,*, John B Pendry 1, Vincenzo Galdi 2, Yun Lai 3, S
    Page 1 of 59 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - draft 1 2 3 4 Roadmap on Transformation Optics 5 Martin McCall 1,*, John B Pendry 1, Vincenzo Galdi 2, Yun Lai 3, S. A. R. Horsley 4, Jensen Li 5, Jian 6 Zhu 5, Rhiannon C Mitchell-Thomas 4, Oscar Quevedo-Teruel 6, Philippe Tassin 7, Vincent Ginis 8, 7 9 9 9 6 10 8 Enrica Martini , Gabriele Minatti , Stefano Maci , Mahsa Ebrahimpouri , Yang Hao , Paul Kinsler 11 11,12 13 14 15 9 , Jonathan Gratus , Joseph M Lukens , Andrew M Weiner , Ulf Leonhardt , Igor I. 10 Smolyaninov 16, Vera N. Smolyaninova 17, Robert T. Thompson 18, Martin Wegener 18, Muamer Kadic 11 18 and Steven A. Cummer 19 12 13 14 Affiliations 15 1 16 Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Department of Physics, Prince Consort Road, 17 London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom 18 19 2 Field & Waves Lab, Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, I-82100 Benevento, Italy 20 21 3 College of Physics, Optoelectronics and Energy & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano 22 Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China 23 24 4 University of Exeter, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QL United 25 26 Kingdom 27 5 28 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, 29 United Kingdom 30 31 6 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10044, Stockholm, Sweden 32 33 7 Department of Physics, Chalmers University , SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden 34 35 8 Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium 36 37 9 Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e Scienze Matematiche, University of Siena, Via Roma, 38 39 56 53100 Siena, Italy 40 10 41 School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, 42 London E1 4FZ, United Kingdom 43 44 11 Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4 YB, United Kingdom 45 46 12 Cockcroft Institute, Sci-Tech Daresbury, Daresbury WA4 4AD, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics
    Publications 10-1-2004 Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey Indiana University - Bloomington, [email protected] V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University - Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/publication Part of the Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Physics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Bailey, Q. G., & Kostelecký, V. A. (2004). Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics. Physical Review D, 70(7). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.076006 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey and V. Alan Kosteleck´y Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, U.S.A. (Dated: IUHET 472, July 2004) The static limit of Lorentz-violating electrodynamics in vacuum and in media is investigated. Features of the general solutions include the need for unconventional boundary conditions and the mixing of electrostatic and magnetostatic effects. Explicit solutions are provided for some simple cases. Electromagnetostatics experiments show promise for improving existing sensitivities to parity- odd coefficients for Lorentz violation in the photon sector. I. INTRODUCTION electrodynamics in Minkowski spacetime, coupled to an arbitrary 4-current source. There exists a substantial Since its inception, relativity and its underlying theoretical literature discussing the electrodynamics limit Lorentz symmetry have been intimately linked to clas- of the SME [19], but the stationary limit remains unex- sical electrodynamics. A century after Einstein, high- plored to date. We begin by providing some general in- sensitivity experiments based on electromagnetic phe- formation about this theory, including some aspects as- nomena remain popular as tests of relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrostatics
    Ben Franklin, 1750 “Kite Experiment” – link between lightening and sparks Electrostatics “electrical” fire from the clouds Greeks noticed when they rubbed things against amber an invisible force of attraction occurred. Greek word for amber is elektron, which today represents the word “electrical” Electrostatics Study of electrical charges that can be collected and held in one place Energy at rest- nonmoving electric charge Involves: 1) electric charges, 2) forces between, & 3) their behavior in material An object that exhibits electrical interaction after rubbing is said to be charged Static electricity- electricity caused by friction Charged objects will eventually return to their neutral state Electric Charge “Charge” is a property of subatomic particles. Facts about charge: There are 2 types: positive (protons) and negative (electrons) Matter contains both types of charge ( + & -) occur in pairs, friction separates the two LIKE charges REPEL and OPPOSITE charges ATTRACT Charges are symbolic of fluids in that they can be in 2 states: STATIC or DYNAMIC. Microscopic View of Charge Electrical charges exist w/in atoms 1890, J.J. Thomson discovered the light, negatively charged particles of matter- Electrons 1909-1911 Ernest Rutherford, discovered atoms have a massive, positively charged center- Nucleus Positive nucleus balances out the negative electrons to make atom neutral Can remove electrons w/addition of energy, make atom positively charged or add to make them negatively charged ( called Ions) (+ cations) (- anions) Triboelectric Series Ranks materials according to their tendency to give up their electrons Material exchange electrons by the process of rubbing two objects Electric Charge – The specifics •The symbol for CHARGE is “q” •The SI unit is the COULOMB(C), named after Charles Coulomb •If we are talking about a SINGLE charged particle such as 1 electron or 1 proton we are referring to an ELEMENTARY charge and often use, Some important constants: e , to symbolize this.
    [Show full text]
  • Aharonov-Bohm Detection of Two-Dimensional Magnetostatic Cloaks
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Nazarbayev University Repository PHYSICAL REVIEW B 92, 224414 (2015) Aharonov-Bohm detection of two-dimensional magnetostatic cloaks Constantinos A. Valagiannopoulos Department of Physics, School of Science and Technology, Nazarbayev University, 53 Qabanbay Batyr Avenue, Astana KZ-010000, Kazakhstan Amir Nader Askarpour Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Avenue, Tehran 15875-4413, Iran Andrea Alu` Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1616 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas 78701, USA (Received 29 September 2015; revised manuscript received 16 November 2015; published 10 December 2015) Two-dimensional magnetostatic cloaks, even when perfectly designed to mitigate the magnetic field disturbance of a scatterer, may be still detectable with Aharonov-Bohm (AB) measurements, and therefore may affect quantum interactions and experiments with elongated objects. We explore a multilayered cylindrical cloak whose permeability profile is tailored to nullify the magnetic-flux perturbation of the system, neutralizing its effect on AB measurements, and simultaneously optimally suppress the overall scattering. In this way, our improved magnetostatic cloak combines substantial mitigation of the magnetostatic scattering response with zero detectability by AB experiments. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.224414 PACS number(s): 41.20.Gz, 03.65.Ta, 94.05.Pt, 85.25.Dq I. INTRODUCTION approach, for which no anisotropic or inhomogeneous media are necessary. An alternative experimental demonstration [12] Making an electromagnetic object of arbitrary shape and was reported in the quasistatic regime, and a magnetostatic texture invisible to certain portions of the frequency spec- carpet cloak [13] to hide objects over a superconducting plane trum is one of the most intriguing possibilities offered by is based again on transformation optics.
    [Show full text]