DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Text .Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Text .Pdf HUMAN GEOGRAPHIES – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 7.1 (2013) 61-70. ISSN-print: 1843-6587/$-see back cover; ISSN-online: 2067–2284-open access www.humangeographies.org.ro (c) Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography (c) The author ANALYSIS OF FARMING TYPES’ CHARACTERISTICS IN THE BOIANU PLAIN (ROMANIA) Iuliana Vijuliea*, Gabriela Maneaa, Elena Mateia, Laura Tîrlăa, Ionuţ Trincăb a University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Bucharest, Romania bMinistry of Regional Development and Tourism, Bucharest Romania Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the distribution and dimensional structure of the farms depending on their legal status, and the owners’ perceptions on the current status. The main research methods used in the study were: direct observation method, digital mapping, statistical analysis, surveying (semi-structured interview) and SWOT analysis. The Boianu Plain is by excellence an agricultural region. Its arable land is worked/operated by three main categories of farms: individual holdings, family farming associations and farming societies. Production obtained within individual holdings is always lower comparative to family farming associations and especially to farming societies. Partnership helps farmers to join their technical and financial means in order to increase the annual production and, implicitly, gain profit. In this respect, the farmers’ perception resulted from the semi-structured interviews is a good evaluation instrument. The most critical issue at local level is making individual farmers aware of the benefits of family association and/or farmland leasing. The SWOT analysis reveals the possibility of an efficient management as driven by the way that the existing opportunities are able to mitigate or completely remove the weaknesses. The Boianu Plain has a very good agricultural potential in a highly favourable environment, but poorly capitalized. Key words: Agricultural exploitation, Farming choice, Subsistence, Individual holding, Family farming association, Farming society. Article Info: Manuscript Received: April 5, 2011; Revised: April 23, 2013; Accepted: April 30, 2013; Online: May 25, 2013. Introduction farms functioning. Despite that the USA is seen having large units, most farms in the United States Agricultural exploitation size at global scale. The are small farms, defined since 1975 as those which problem of the rational size of the agricultural obtain at least 1000$ yearly. The US Department of holding has been a subject for scientists separately or Agriculture estimates that about 92% are small farms. inside large organizations (FAO, World Bank) for a Even there are government supported agencies that long time. On the world’s farming system sizing is a provide technical and educational support to the controversial debate. Thus, adepts of the large farm farm community, small farms are confronted with underline the rising of crops productivity for the several issues among are: limited resources (land and medium and large farm in South America (Helfand & equipment), purchasing power (small quantities and Levine, 2004), or on the palms’ plantations in South no discount), limited availability of custom field work Asia (Deininger & Byerlee, 2011). Moreover, in Africa, (Poole, 2003). many countries attempted to transform and While many small farmlands trend to be unified in modernize agriculture through large-scale farming, rental forms or associations in Africa or America, in providing subsidized credit, machinery, and land, but Eastern Europe has recently undergone from the all efforts have generally failed (Eicher & Baker, 1992). former Soviet system of collectivization and state Many debates are around small and medium sized farms to new private agrarian structures. Thus, the land has unfolded in many ways, leading to the * Corresponding author: appearance of medium and small properties, Address: : University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, 1, Nicolae depending on countries political legacy. But in these Bălcescu Avenue, 010041, Bucharest, Romania. countries after several years the plots were quickly Telephone: +4 021 315 30 74 Email: [email protected] rented back by companies with access to finance and machinery, because small dimensions of farm lead to doi:10.5719/hgeo.2013.71.61 IULIANA VIJULIE ET AL. decreasing of agricultural products in Russia, hectares. The difference between this type and a Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and the movement toward farming company is given by the smaller size and the largest holdings, corporate farms (Deininger & lack of employers (Sarris & Gavrilescu, 1996). Byerlee, 2011). The farming societies were established by the Rule Farming system changes in the post-communist no. 36/1991 and they are also known as associations Romania. Romania subscribes to the Eastern with legal status or formal farming associations. They European pattern, the Boianu Plain farming system do not have a commercial character. They have legal being a similar case to other Romanian areas. During status, some of them keeping elements of the the socialist era it was one of the countries depicting cooperative organization, but on totally new bases; the highest economic size of the agricultural now, every owner knows where his plot is located; he exploitations. The situation dramatically changed has the property right over the assets of the after the Land Reform – Rule no. 18/1991 was association (equipment, herds etc.); the society implemented, Romania becoming the country with defends the farmers’ rights in the market relationship the lowest economic size of these exploitations (Rusu, 2005; Bold & Crăciun, 2005). (Popescu, 2011). The individual holdings have sizes A significant part of the farm land in the between a few acres and tens of thousands hectares; association comes from persons, who regained their nevertheless, the great exploitations in Romania property right, but they live in the urban together hold 2.9 million ha of arable land, meaning environment, abroad or they consider themselves too 30% of the total arable land of Romania (Otiman, old to work their land (Rusu, 2005; Simion 2010). 2012). In 2007, the number of farms in Romania was Nowadays, Romania confronts the same problems. 3,931,350, about 8% lower as compared to the number The Land Reform, through the actions of restoration registered at the Structural Research in Agriculture and creation of property rights, get to Romania after 2005 and over 12% lower than the Agricultural 1990, new types of agricultural entities engaged in Universal Census in 2002 (NSI1, 2008). The number of farming. In the literature and official statistics main the individual farm exploitations (holdings) was existing names as agricultural units, agricultural 3,913,651 which is about 7.7 (%) lower than in 2005 societies (companies), farms, agricultural holdings, and 12.3 (%) lower than in 2002, and the number of etc. are used (Rusu, 2005; Simion, 2010; Vijulie, 2010, units with legal status was 17,699 which is 3.1 (%) etc.). lower than in 2005 and 21.9 (%) than in 2002 (NSI, Farm classification is a compulsory action to 2008). correct perception of the current status and The increase of the physical dimension of the mutations that occur in agricultural structures in farms in Romania represents a significant issue to be Romania (Rusu, 2005). The applied organization is solved in order to reduce the gap between Romania dependent on the legal form of organization. In fact, and the other Member States of the European Union there are two types in this respect: unincorporated (Luca et al., 2012). farms and agricultural units with legal status. Among the actions designated to increase the Unincorporated farms are represented by individual physical dimension of the farms is primarily to holdings and family farming associations. proceed on the structural reform. The following tasks After the Land Reform adoption (Rule no. 18/1991 are aimed to: to complete the process of ceding the and Rule no. 1/2000), the individual holdings were farm lands back again; to clarify the legal status of the established (Glogoveţan et al., 2011). They are difficult farm lands; to intensify the action of the National to define, although efforts in this direction were Agency of Land Survey and Real Estate Advertising in made. order to reduce the identification, measurement and The individual holding is „an economic and social registering the property rights in the Land Registry unit compound of all persons living in the same house, costs; to activate the area changing between owners related by blood or not, who regularly administer the in order to ease the process of farm lands merging available resources. Usually, these are small affairs into larger farms (Popescu, 2011). based on the family relationship and resources” (Rusu, An important action taken in 2005 (Rule no. 2005: 97). 247/2005) and applied between 2006 and 2009, which The family farming associations represent the contributed to amalgamating of the farm lands was to second type of farming with no legal status (Rusu, grant the life annuity of 100€ in case of property 2005; Bold & Crăciun, 2005). These structures were selling and 50€ if only leasing it by the owners over 62 incorporated under the Rule no. 36/1991. They do not years old. At the beginning of 2010, the life annuity have legal authority, being constituted on the basis of was repealed by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural the verbal agreement between two or more families Development (MARD),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the CAP Measures Applicable to the Wine Sector
    Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: Romania Written by Agrosynergie EEIG Agrosynergie November – 2018 Groupement Européen d’Intérêt Economique AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Directorate C – Strategy, simplification and policy analysis Unit C.4 – Monitoring and Evaluation E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: Romania Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development 2018 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 Catalogue number: KF-05-18-079-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-79-97275-1 doi: 10.2762/62004 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Images © Agrosynergie, 2018 EEIG AGROSYNERGIE is formed by the following companies: ORÉADE-BRÈCHE Sarl & COGEA S.r.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Procesul De Eliminare a Chiaburilor Din Structura Socială
    MUZEUL JUDEŢEAN ARGEŞ ARGESIS, STUDII ŞI COMUNICĂRI, seria ISTORIE, TOM XXVIII, 2019, p. 301-310 PROCESUL DE ELIMINARE A CHIABURILOR DIN STRUCTURA SOCIALĂ. APLICAREA DECRETULUI 115/1959 ÎN JUDEȚUL TELEORMAN MIHAI CĂTĂLIN ZARZĂRĂ* La 30 martie 1959 este publicat Decretul 115 pentru lichidarea rămășițelor oricăror forme de exploatare a omului de către om în agricultură, în scopul ridicării continue a nivelului de trai material și cultural al țărănimii muncitoare și al dezvoltării construcției socialiste. În conținutul decretului se preciza că peste 2 milioane de familii țărănești din totalul de circa 3.600.000 făceau parte din gospodăriile agricole colective și întovărășirile agricole, care împreună cu gospodăriile agricole de stat cuprindeau peste 8.400.000 de ha ceea ce reprezenta mai mult de 60% din totalul suprafeței agricole. Decretul avea menirea de a da lovitura de grație acelor proprietari care mai dețineau încă terenuri agricole și refuzau intrarea în colectiv, dorindu-se finalizarea procesului de colectivizare a agriculturii, început în martie 1949. Conform acestui decret, chiaburilor, care aveau terenuri agricole a căror întindere, conform estimărilor conducătorilor comuniști, depășea puterea de muncă a chiaburului, precum și cea a membrilor familiei cu care duc gospodăria împreună, li se interzicea darea în parte sau în arendă a terenurilor agricole precum și orice altfel de exploatare a muncii străine. Conform art. 2 terenurile vizate și aparținând chiaburilor erau următoarele: - terenurile lăsate nelucrate mai mult de un an, - terenurile nedeclarate în registrul agricol, - terenurile date în arendă sau în parte în condițiile în care întinderea acestora depășea puterea de muncă a proprietarului și a membrilor cu care duce gospodăria împreună.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Showcase: Project Citizen Devoted to Roma Issues
    Appendix C Showcase Project Citizen Devoted to Roma Issues Parliament Building, Bucharest June 1, 2011 On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, a Project Citizen Showcase, held at the National Parliament Building in Bucharest, featured presentations by student teams from eleven public schools across Romania. Those schools had been involved for only a few months in focusing their Project Citizen efforts on issues impacting Roma students, families, and communities. The showcase also attracted teachers, principals, national civic education leaders, a Florida-Romania Partnership delegation from the United States, and two members of the Romanian Parliament, who participated in the entire session. Calin Rus, Director of Institute Intercultural of Timişoara, welcomed all of the students and guests to this first-ever Project Citizen Showcase devoted to Roma issues. He thanked the students and their teachers and principals for their hard and thoughtful work. In a brief poll, he asked how many of the students were visiting Bucharest for the first time (about 45 percent). He then asked FLREA Executive Director students how many were visiting the Parliament Building for the first Annette Boyd Pitts, IIT Director time (nearly 100 percent). Some groups had traveled for twelve Calin Rus, and Parliament hours across Romania to be at the event. Member Maria Stavrositu during a Project Citizen Showcase. After brief remarks by U.S. delegation members, Annette Boyd Pitts, Executive Director of the Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.; Irving Slosberg, a member of the Florida House of Representatives; and Kenneth Anthony, a lecturer in the College of Education at Mississippi State University, Rus invited each of the eleven teams to do their five-minute presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Informatie Over De Stand Van Zaken Samenwerking Met Roemenie En Een Terugblik Op Bezoek Van Provinciale Staten Aan Donaudagen 2006
    www.overijssel.nl Provinciate Staten van Overijssel. Postadres Provincie Overijssel Postbus 10078 8000 GB Zwolle Telefoon 038 499 88 99 Telefax 038 425 48 41 Uw kenmerk Uw brief Ons kenmerk Datum WB/2006/2882 29 08 2006 Bijlagen Doorkiesnummer Inlichtingen bij div. 499 78 43 hr. H.W.J. van Dijk Onderwerp Waterproject Roemenie; informatie over de stand van zaken samenwerking met Roemenie en een terugblik op bezoek van Provinciale Staten aan Donaudagen 2006. Herder is aan u het werkplan over de samen werking met Roemenie toegezonden. Inmiddels wordt een aantal activiteiten van dit werkplan uitgevoerd en zijn onderdelen gerealiseerd. Een overzicht van de stand van zaken vindt u op het Stateninformatiesysteem onder nummer PS/2006/708. Tussen 28 juni en 1 juli 2006 was een delegatie van tien leden van de statencommissie Verkeer, Milieu en Water op werkbezoek tijdens de Donau-dagen bij de Roemeense provincie Teleorman., een samenwerkingspartner van Overijssel en Gelderland. Een Engelstalig verslag van deze dagen vindt u op het Stateninformatiesysteem onder nummer PS/2006/708. Overigens zal de secretaris van de commissie u informeren aan de hand van zijn verslag van deze dagen. Via de Donaudagen 2006, een symposium met werkbezoeken, werd kennis genomen van het door de provincie Overijssel samen metVitens B.V. en vijf Oost-Nederlandse waterschappen uitgevoerde eerste samenwerkingsproject. Dit project vindt plaats op watergebied op de aspecten drink- en afvalwater en hoogwater- bescherming. Het doel van het project is een versnelde en structurele verbetering van de drink- en afValwatersituatie voor de inwoners van Teleorman. Deze drink- en afvalwatersituatie kan momenteel als slecht worden beoordeeld.Tevens is een doel van het project het bereiken van een structurele vermindering van de overstromingsrisico's.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Knowledge on the Amphibians and Reptiles of Teleorman County (Southern Romania) Alexandru IFTIME1, *, Oana IFTIME2
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 58 (1–2) pp. 63–71 DOI: 10.1515/travmu-2016-0009 Research paper Contributions to the Knowledge on the Amphibians and Reptiles of Teleorman County (Southern Romania) Alexandru IFTIME1, *, Oana IFTIME2 1“Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, Şos. Kiseleff 1, 011341 Bucharest 1, Romania 2Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Aleea Portocalelor 1–3, 060101 Bucharest 6, Romania *corresponding author, e–mail: [email protected] Received: July 1, 2015; Accepted: March 31, 2016; Available online: April 20, 2016; Printed: April 25, 2016 Abstract. The results of faunistical surveys of the amphibians in Teleorman county (Southern Romania) are presented here; we have identified nine amphibian species (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris, Bombina bombina, Pelobates syriacus, P. fuscus, Bufo bufo, B. viridis, Hyla arborea, Rana dalmatina, Pelophylax ridibundus), two amphibian hybrids (Triturus cristatus × T. dobrogicus and Pelophylax kl. esculentus) and six reptile species (Emys orbicularis, Lacerta agilis, L. viridis, Podarcis tauricus, Natrix natrix, Dolichophis caspius), with new records for many of these. Key words: Teleorman county, amphibians, reptiles, localities, distribution. INTRODUCTION In the general climate of flourishing faunistic studies in herpetology in Romania (see, e.g., Cogălniceanu et al., 2013a, b and literature quoted therein), Teleorman county remains under–represented in terms of both studies and distribution records for amphibian and reptile species. Despite some recent interesting reptile records (Sahlean et al., 2010, for Dolichophis caspius; Sos et al., 2012, for Darevskia praticola; Covaciu–Marcov et al., 2012 and Cioflec, 2014 forEryx jaculus), data synthesis shows that although there are records of numerous species (Triturus cristatus, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Disparities Related to Socio-Economic Determinants of Agriculture in the Romanian Plain
    Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, vol. X, 1, 2018, p. 79 – 99 REGIONAL DISPARITIES RELATED TO SOCIO-ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF AGRICULTURE IN THE ROMANIAN PLAIN Irena MOCANU, Ines GRIGORESCU, Bianca MITRICĂ, Elena-Ana POPOVICI, Monica DUMITRAȘCU Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy Abstract: The structure and pattern of agriculture in Romania has been facing significant changes over the past decades in relation to the contextual social, political and economic transformations. The current study is seeking to assess the determinants of agriculture in the main agricultural region of Romania (Romanian Plain) based on selected socio- economic factors. The authors selected nine socio-economic indicators (agricultural surface, labour renewal index, economic dependency index, economically active population, employment in agriculture, vitality index, share of young labour, share of female population and roads and railway density) which were aggregated into an index of socio-economic determinants of agriculture. Overall, the final index values revealed spatial differences which enabled a certain separation between the eastern, central and western parts of the Romanian Plain: socio-economic favourability for agriculture in the central and, to some extent, in the eastern parts and a significantly reduced favourability in the western area. The current research could become an important step for in-depth assessments of environmental and socio-economic determinants of agriculture, developing strategies and supporting policies at different spatial scales. Key Words: index of socio-economic determinants, agricultural development, regional disparities, Romanian Plain. Introduction Agriculture plays a central role for food security and sustainable development (Smith et al. 2014) being one of the foremost land uses in Europe (Rounsevell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects Regarding the House, Education and Health Infrastructure in South-Muntenia Region
    Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2017 PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952 ASPECTS REGARDING THE HOUSE, EDUCATION AND HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE IN SOUTH-MUNTENIA REGION Elena LASCĂR University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest – The Faculty of Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, Calarasi Branch, Romania, Phone/Fax: 00 40 745 17 15 83, Email: [email protected] Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The infrastructure contains a supporting element, with a special importance to support all economic, social and cultural activities in the rural area. The infrastructure covers both structural area giving unity to the system and space area, thus creating a viable territorial configuration, which is reflected by different levels of accessibility. It is actually the circulatory framework of the economic and social system, individualized in a well determined space, as the regional one. South Muntenia region is characterized by a well defined infrastructure as a result of its advantageous geographical position. Its location in a peripheral area of Romania favored the emergence of major road ways, which allowed the development of its relations not only with neighboring national regions, but also with neighboring country Bulgaria. The present paper analyses the educational and medical infrastructure in the region, showing thus the discrepancies in the education and medical system and equipment across the region. It is pertinent analysis allowing the make improvements in this area. Key words: region, development, infrastructure, area INTRODUCTION surface concentrated mainly in the South counties of the region has 71% of the total South-Muntenia Region is situated in the surface of the region, of which 80,2% South-East part of Romania, bordering to the represents arable land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romanian Earthquake of March 4, 1977 Revisited: New
    th The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China THE ROMANIAN EARTHQUAKE OF MARCH 4, 1977 REVISITED: NEW INSIGHTS INTO ITS TERRITORIAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND THEIR BEARING ON THE PREPAREDNESS FOR THE FUTURE Emil-Sever GEORGESCU 1, Antonios POMONIS 2 1 CE, PhD , Scientific Director, The National Institute for Building Research – INCERC, Sos. Pantelimon 266, Bucharest, Romania, E-mail: [email protected] 2 CE, MSc, Risk Management Solutions, Athens, Greece. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT : The Vrancea, Romania earthquake of March 4, 1977 was one of the worst earthquake disasters of the 1970’s around the world. It caused the loss of 1,578 lives and injured an additional 11,321, with 90% of the fatalities being in the capital city Bucharest. The reported damages included 32,900 collapsed or heavily damaged dwelling units, 35,000 homeless families, thousands of damaged buildings, as well as many other damages and destructions in industry and infrastructure. A 1978 World Bank report estimated a total loss of US$ 2.048 billion, with Bucharest, accounting for 70% of the total. More detailed but until recently classified and largely ignored damage data (ICCPDC reports, December 1978) contai n information from 19 counties plus Bucharest, with the total damage value reaching Romanian Lei 3.7 billion, out of which damage in Bucharest accounts for 42%. Loss data from 20 ministries having assets in 25 affected counties amounts to Romanian Lei 3.5 billion. Thus, the total loss reaches Romanian Lei 7.25 billion. The territorial loss was heavy in many counties and its geographic distribution surprising, with limited damage in the epicentral region and extensive damage in faraway counties and reasons for this surprising pattern are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Zimnicea Municipality
    1 ZIMNICEA ZIMNICEA CITY HALL LOCAL AGENDA 21 – Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Zimnicea Municipality ZIMNICEA 2004 2 MUNICIPALITY UNDP Project ROM 98/012, 0033238 Copyright 2004 Zimnicea City Hall, Romania 1, Giurgiului Str., Zimnicea, Teleorman County Tel: 0247/ 366196 Fax: 0247/ 366780 E-Mail: [email protected] © 2004 National Centre for Sustainable Development 15 Alexandru Philippide St., Sector 2, Bucharest Tel: +4021 201 14 10 Fax: +4021 201 14 02 E-Mail: [email protected] The opinions expressed belong to the authors and do not necessarily represent the point of view of the UNDP. Document published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme Between September 2003 – January 2004, the project was co-financed by USAID- GRASP Programme Technical expertise provided by the National Centre for Sustainable Development. 3 ZIMNICEA Local Steering Committee (LSC) Pârvu Petre, President – Mayor, Zimnicea Drăghici Dan – Director, Zimnicea Hospital Mareş Dan – Director, SC Urbana Calotă Gheorghe – Vice Mayor, Zimnicea Vida Aurel – Agronomical Engineer – Plant Protection Centre Matei Ioana – County Employment Agency– Work Force Office – Unemployment, Zimnicea Tote Petre – Retired Local Agenda 21 Office: Marilena Şoimeanu Camelia Ţurcan Consultancy from the National Centre for Sustainable Development – NCSD: Călin Georgescu – Project manager George Romanca – Local coordinator for Arad, Bolintin Vale, Mediaş, Sibiu, Sighişoara, Târgovişte cities Radu Vădineanu – Local coordinator for Câmpina, Piteşti, Fălticeni, Târgu Jiu, Vatra Dornei cities Tania Mihu – Local coordinator for Slatina and Zimnicea cities Dan Apostol – Editorial, cultural, scientific consultant Carmen Năstase – Financial coordinator Bianca Bacinschi – Communication Adrian Voinea – IT Specialist Coordination of Working Groups: Economy - Coordinator: Salcie Daniela Social - Coordinator: Calotă Gheorghe Environmental Protection - Coordinator: Berechet Ionel Human Resources - Coordinator: Vidrighin Adrian 4 MUNICIPALITY 5 ZIMNICEA CONTENTS Foreword by the United Nations II.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Waste Management System in Teleorman County
    ISPA INFORMATION SHEET Measure No 2002 RO 16 P PE 024 Measure title Integrated Waste Management System in Teleorman County Authority responsible for implementation Name: Central Finance and Contracting Unit (CFCU) Ministry of Public Finance Address: MAGHERU Avenue no. 6-8, 5th floor Bucharest ROMANIA E-mail: [email protected] Description Teleorman is a county located in the south of Romania, in the middle of the Romanian Plain and bordered by the Danube in its southern part. The county surface is about 5 790 km2, which is about 2.4 % of the surface area of Romania. The county is administratively organised in 3 municipalities (Alexandria, Rosiorii de Vede and Turnu Magurele), 2 cities (Zimnicea and Videle) and 83 communes. The administrative capital is in Alexandria. In the year 2000, there were 456 000 inhabitants in Teleorman County. The current solid waste management in Teleorman County does not adequately protect the environment. The waste collection is only organised for the five cities and four communes, and without any sorting at source. The project concerns domestic waste collected in Teleorman County, and includes the following main components: 1) Sorting and collection of solid waste (pre-collection points for urban domestic waste, concrete platforms at rural centres, new pre-collection points for street waste, euro-bins and euro-containers, individual composting units, waste collection vehicles and street cleaning vehicles); 2) New landfill at Mavrodin, recycling and composting (sanitary landfill for non-hazardous domestic solid waste, a sorting unit, a composting section) 3) Closure and rehabilitation of existing landfills and other dumping sites (five existing uncontrolled landfills and about 318 legal and 70 illegal smaller dumping sites will be closed and rehabilitated); 4) Technical Assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Jantzen Development Has Acquired and Sold on More Than 26,000 Hectares of Farmland in Southern Romania
    CONTACT MENU Our history Since our establishment in the Romanian market in 2006, Jantzen Development has acquired and sold on more than 26,000 hectares of farmland in southern Romania. We have also advised several major farmland transactions on the market - on the side of the buyer or the seller. Furthermore, we've been involved in the establishment and start- up management of significant agricultural projects: JD Agro Cocora Managing the purchase, consolidation, measurement and registration of 5,700 ha of farmland located in Cocora, Ialomita county, the building of a green-field farm with 35.000 tons of silo capacity, the initial start up management, and subsequent management of the farm - Jantzen Development is the main shareholder in the project. www.romaniafarminvest.dk Agri Invest The purchase and consolidation of 2,700 ha of farmland located near Videle, Teleorman county for a group of Scandinavian investors. Agri Invest operate the land themselves. www.agriinvest.eu Black Sea project The purchase, consolidation, measurement and registration of 4,250 ha of farmland located in Amzacea and Chirnogeni located south of Constanta, in Constanta county - part of the land was sold. Jantzen Development still owns 3,300 ha leased to two professional farmers in the area. Bengt Agro The purchase, consolidation, measurement and registration 1,000 ha of farmland near Alexandria in Teleorman county on behalf of a foreign investor - the land is leased to local farmers and is under Jantzen Development's management. Selected transactions Selected transactions Egger Group - acquisition of 720 ha in Braila Interagro - acquisition of 410 ha in Teleorman Brise Group - acquisition of 80 ha in Constanta GNP - acquisition of 120 ha in Constanta Agribucur - acquisition of 320 ha in Constanta KC Agro Investment - acquisition of 1,900 ha in Buzau First Farms - transactions of 2,600 ha in Buzau and Teleorman Arland - sale of 2,200 ha in Botosani Premium Pork - sale of 1,200 ha in Galati JANTZEN DEVELOPMENT S.R.L Calea Floreasca no.
    [Show full text]