MYANMAR Appeal Cases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MYANMAR Appeal Cases 1 amnesty international MYANMAR Appeal Cases September 1996 AI Index: ASA 16/37/96 Distr: SC/CO INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT, 1 EASTON STREET, LONDON WC1X 8DJ, UNITED KINGDOM MYANMAR SAN SAN NWE: JOURNALIST AND WRITER SENTENCED TO 7 YEARS IMPRISONMENT (NLD), Myanmar’s foremost opposition party founded by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in 1988. Her writing has been banned in Myanmar since the beginning of the 1988 democracy movement. All publications are heavily censored there, and the government controls most of the media. However, one of her banned short stories was featured in a book entitled “Inked Over, Ripped Out, Burmese Storytellers and the Censors”, which was published by the PEN American Center in 1993. In March 1993 Daw San San Nwe made this Daw San San Nwe, a 51-year-old journalist and comment about her role as a writer: well-known writer, was arrested on 4 or 5 August 1994 in Yangon. A widow with four children, she “I believe that it is not the duty of a writer to take was arrested with her daughter Ma Myat Mo Mo part personally in political battles; it is my Tun and two other political leaders. According conviction that a writer discharges his or her duty to the State Law and Order Restoration Council simply by observing and putting on record the (SLORC, Myanmar’s military government), the rights and wrongs, the justices and injustices that four were detained for passing on information to result from these battles.” foreign journalists and diplomats “against or critical of the government in order to make Once democracy was established in Myanmar, foreign governments misunderstand the Daw San San Nwe had planned to resign from government.” They were also accused of sending the NLD in order to take an independent stand information to the United Nations Special as a writer. However, because of a lack of Rapporteur for human rights on Myanmar. progress towards democracy, she felt that she must continue to work on behalf of the party. Daw San San Nwe was sentenced on 6 October 1994 to seven years’ imprisonment under She was born on 28 August 1945 in the town of Section 5(e) of the 1950 Emergency Provisions Tha-ya-wadi, about 50 miles north of Yangon, Act (for spreading false information) and three and took Tha-ya-wadi as her pen name. She years under Section 17(1) of the Unlawful began her career at 13 when she wrote poems Associations Act (membership or contact with and stories for The Children’s Journal. She also illegal organizations). However Amnesty wrote for newspapers when she was a teenager, International believes that she is a prisoner of and later married another journalist in 1966 and conscience, imprisoned solely for exercising her moved to Yangon. Her first novel was written in rights to freedom of expression and assembly. 1974, but it was her third novel Prison of Daw San San Nwe had been arrested previously Darkness, critical of the ruling party’s policies, in July 1989 during a nationwide crackdown by which created interest among the general public the military of the political opposition. She is a and politicians. member of the National League for Democracy Amnesty International September 1996 AI Index: ASA 16/37/96 Please call for the immediate and unconditional release of Daw San San Nwe, and all other prisoners of conscience in Myanmar. Write to: General Than Shwe Lt General Khin Nyunt Chairman Secretary 1 State. Law and Order Restoration Council State Law and Order Restoration Council c/o Ministry of Defence c/o Ministry of Defence Signal Pagoda Road Signal Pagoda Road Yangon Yangon Union of Myanmar Union of Myanmar •Send copies of some of your letters to the Myanmar Embassy in your country, or, if there is no Embassy, to: His Excellency Ohn Gyaw Minister of Foreign Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yangon Union of Myanmar Amnesty International September 1996 AI Index: ASA 16/37/96 MYANMAR WIN TIN: JOURNALIST SERVING A 19 YEAR PRISON SENTENCE SLORC to sentence political detainees to long terms of imprisonment. Amnesty International believes that Win Tin is a prisoner of conscience, imprisoned solely for peacefully exercising his rights to freedom of expression and assembly. A former newspaper editor, Win Tin was Vice Chairman of the Writers’ Association for a brief time in 1988 when it was possible to form independent associations. He was also active in forming trade union newspapers. Win Tin, a 66-year-old prominent journalist, Win Tin received a Bachelor of Arts degree in was arrested on 4 July 1989 during a English literature, Modern History, and nationwide crackdown on the opposition by Political Science from Yangon University in the ruling military authorities, the State Law 1953. He was also a consultant with the and Order Restoration Council (SLORC). He Djambartan publishing company of the was originally accused of influencing and Netherlands from 1954 to 1957, and has guiding Daw Aung San Suu Kyi when the travelled widely in Western Europe and Asia. National League for Democracy (NLD), Myanmar’s largest opposition party, was Win Tin has been in poor health for several founded by her and others in 1988. He was years; he suffers from spondylitis, an also accused of being a leftist politician who inflammation of the vertebrae. He has also urged the NLD to adopt a civil disobedience lost several teeth and requires dental campaign against martial law in 1989. Win treatment. Win Tin is dependent on his family Tin was believed to have cited the works of for medicine and meat, which he needs for his the philosopher Henry David Thoreau and the medical condition. example of Mahatma Gandhi. He was an original Central Executive Committee member In mid November 1995 he and a group of of the NLD, and a close associate of Daw other NLD political prisoners were placed in Aung San Suu Kyi. military dog cells, small prison cells normally used for dogs. They were also made to sleep He was initially charged with a criminal on cold concrete floors and could not receive offence and sentenced to three years’ hard visits from their families. Prisoners’ families labour in October 1989. In light of the normally give them food and medicine to SLORC’s allegations that he was guilty of supplement the inadequate prison provisions. political offences, Amnesty International Prison officials were evidently punishing the believes that the criminal charges were used as group for allegedly having passed on a letter a pretext to imprison him. In June 1992 - just a describing poor prison conditions to the UN few months before completing this prison Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in sentence - he was sentenced to an additional Myanmar. In early January they were moved 11 years under the 1950 Emergency from the police dog cells to larger solitary Provisions Act, which is widely used by the confinement cells. All of them were brought to Amnesty International September 1996 AI Index: ASA 16/37/96 trial in the prison without being allowed any legal representation. On 28 March 1996 U Win Tin and 20 others were sentenced under Section 5j of the 1950 Emergency Provisions Act and under a Section of the Myanmar Penal Code relating to misappropriation of state property. It is not known why these charges were brought against them. U Win Tin received an additional five year prison term. Amnesty International believes that U Win Tin and the others were sentenced solely for exercising their rights to “contact with the outside world” as provided for in Articles 37 and 39 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. Amnesty International remains gravely concerned for the health of U Win Tin. •Please call for the immediate and unconditional release of U Win Tin. At the same time express concern for his health and urge that he be provided with all the medical care that he needs, and that he be detained under conditions conforming to minimum international standards. Write to: General Than Shwe Lt General Khin Nyunt Chairman Secretary 1 State Law and Order Restoration Council State Law and Order Restoration Council c/o Ministry of Defence c/o Ministry of Defence Signal Pagoda Road Signal Pagoda Road Yangon Yangon Union of Myanmar Union of Myanmar •Send copies of some of your letters to the Myanmar Embassy in your country, or to: His Excellency Ohn Gyaw Minister of Foreign Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yangon Union of Myanmar Amnesty International September 1996 AI Index: ASA 16/37/96 MYANMAR MA THIDA: SURGEON AND WRITER SENTENCED TO 20 YEARS IMPRISONMENT the SLORC has refused to accept the result and remains in power today. Dr Ma Thida and the others arrested with her were held incommunicado before being brought to trial. The first attempt to start the trial had to be postponed because large crowds gathered at the courtroom. The trial finally began on 27 September. Dr Ma Thida and the 10 other defendants were charged with endangering public tranquillity under Section 5j of the 1950 Emergency Provisions Act, having contact with unlawful associations under Section 17(1) of the 1908 Unlawful Dr Ma Thida, a surgeon and well-known writer, Associations Act, and distributing unlawful was arrested in July 1993 together with a literature under Sections 17 and 20 of the 1962 number of other members of the National Printers and Publishers Registration Act. League for Democracy (NLD). Prominent Amnesty International believes that the amongst Myanmar’s political opposition, she vaguely-worded provisions of these laws have had earlier been a campaign assistant for Daw been used to sentence Dr Ma Thida and the Aung San Suu Kyi, one of the leaders of the others to long terms of imprisonment solely for NLD.
Recommended publications
  • Burma's Long Road to Democracy
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Priscilla Clapp A career officer in the U.S. Foreign Service, Priscilla Clapp served as U.S. chargé d’affaires and chief of mission in Burma (Myanmar) from June 1999 to August 2002. After retiring from the Foreign Service, she has continued to Burma’s Long Road follow events in Burma closely and wrote a paper for the United States Institute of Peace entitled “Building Democracy in Burma,” published on the Institute’s Web site in July 2007 as Working Paper 2. In this Special to Democracy Report, the author draws heavily on her Working Paper to establish the historical context for the Saffron Revolution, explain the persistence of military rule in Burma, Summary and speculate on the country’s prospects for political transition to democracy. For more detail, particularly on • In August and September 2007, nearly twenty years after the 1988 popular uprising the task of building the institutions for stable democracy in Burma, public anger at the government’s economic policies once again spilled in Burma, see Working Paper 2 at www.usip.org. This into the country’s city streets in the form of mass protests. When tens of thousands project was directed by Eugene Martin, and sponsored by of Buddhist monks joined the protests, the military regime reacted with brute force, the Institute’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention. beating, killing, and jailing thousands of people. Although the Saffron Revolution was put down, the regime still faces serious opposition and unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Reverberations from Regime Shake-Up in Rangoon.Qxd
    Asia-PacificAsia-Pacific SecuritySecurity SStudiestudies RegionalRegional ReverberationsReverberations fromfrom RegimeRegime Shake-upShake-up inin RangoonRangoon Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Volume 4 - Number 1, January 2005 Key Findings The reverberations from the recent regime shake-up in Rangoon continue to be felt in regional capitals. Since prime minister Khin Nyunt was the chief architect of closer China-Burma strategic ties, his sudden removal has been interpret- ed as a major setback for China's strategic goals in Burma. Dr. Mohan Malik is a Professor with the Asia-Pacific Center for However, an objective assessment of China's strategic and eco- Security Studies. nomic needs and Burma's predicament shows that Beijing is His work focuses main- unlikely to easily give up what it has already gained in and ly on Asian Geopolitics through Burma. From China's perspective, Burma should be and Proliferation in Asia-Pacific region. His satisfied to gain a powerful friend, a permanent member of the most recent APCSS UN Security Council, and an economic superpower that comes publication is “India-China Relations: bearing gifts of much needed military hardware, economic aid, Giants Stir, Cooperate infrastructure projects and diplomatic support. and Compete ” The fact remains that ASEAN, India and Japan cannot compete with China either in providing military assistance, diplomatic support or in offering trade and investment benefits. With the UN-brokered talks on political reconciliation having reached a dead end, it might be worthwhile to start afresh with a dia- logue framework of ASEAN+3 (ASEAN plus China, India and Japan) on Burma. This would also put to test China's oft-stated commitment to multi- lateralism and Beijing's penchant for "Asian solutions to Asian problems".
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006
    Burma Page 1 of 24 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Burma Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Since 1962, Burma, with an estimated population of more than 52 million, has been ruled by a succession of highly authoritarian military regimes dominated by the majority Burman ethnic group. The current controlling military regime, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), led by Senior General Than Shwe, is the country's de facto government, with subordinate Peace and Development Councils ruling by decree at the division, state, city, township, ward, and village levels. In 1990 prodemocracy parties won more than 80 percent of the seats in a generally free and fair parliamentary election, but the junta refused to recognize the results. Twice during the year, the SPDC convened the National Convention (NC) as part of its purported "Seven-Step Road Map to Democracy." The NC, designed to produce a new constitution, excluded the largest opposition parties and did not allow free debate. The military government totally controlled the country's armed forces, excluding a few active insurgent groups. The government's human rights record worsened during the year, and the government continued to commit numerous serious abuses. The following human rights abuses were reported: abridgement of the right to change the government extrajudicial killings, including custodial deaths disappearances rape, torture, and beatings of
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION REPORT with Half Page
    Election Report, 2010 Myanmar (Burma) Pre-Election Observations By Burma News International 1 Contents Acknowledgement List of Acronyms………………………………………………………. 6 Introduction…………………………………………………………….. 8 Methodology…………………………………………………………… 10 I.General Overview…………………………………………………… 11 II. Electoral Frame Work……………………………………………… 18 III. Election Administration III.a. Union Election Commission………………………….. 30 III.b. Political Parties………………………………………... 33 III.c. Political Parties Contesting in States and Regions…………………………………………… 40 III.d.Individual Candidates…………………………………. 48 III.e. Cancellation of Constituencies……………………… 51 III.f. Population and Eligible Voters………………………. 52 III.g. Voting Procedure……………………………………... 54 IV. Voter Education and Campaign…………………………………. 56 V. Human Rights, Border Guard Force…………………………….. 62 VI. Irregularities……………………………………………………….. 67 VII. Complaints………………………………………………………… 69 VIII. Observations on Challenges…………………………………… 77 Conclusion……………………………………………………………... 80 Appendix……………………………………………………………….. 82 References…………………………………………………………….. 112 2 Acknowledgements BNI is pleased to present this Pre-election report, which is a compilation of BNI member’s pre-election content, including news, features, photos, video and media releases. This report is a synthesis of accounts and reports by BNI members and its stringers deployed nationwide. It is based on interviews, research and observations of the conditions that prevailed during the pre-election period. BNI also wishes to express its profound gratitude to BNI staff for their kind efforts in writing and editing this report, and thank BNI members for their moral support and resources made available to the BNI election team. BNI also wishes to express its heartfelt thanks to The Open Society Institute for its unwavering support in realizing BNI’s efforts to support the democratization process during Burma’s 2010 election. And, we wish to extend our thanks to all the donors who assist us in this project and who continue to support the monitoring activities of BNI.
    [Show full text]
  • General Khin Nyunt Receives Officials of Fritz Werner Industries (Germany)
    Pubbe ca katapuññata, to be endowed with merits accrued in the past; this is the way to auspiciousness. Established 1914 Volume XII, Number 101 11th Waxing of Second Waso 1366 ME Tuesday, 27 July, 2004 General Khin Nyunt receives officials of Fritz Werner Industries (Germany) YANGON, 26 July — Prime Minister General Minister were Minister for Foreign affairs U Win Khin Nyunt received Mr PD Christ, Sale Direc- Aung, Deputy Minister U Khin Maung Win, tor, Fritz Werner Industries (Germany) and Mr B Deputy Minister for Industry-2 Lt-Col Bieger, Representative, Fritz Werner Industries Khin Maung Kyaw, Director-General of the (Yangon Branch) at Zeyathiri Beikman, Prime Minister’s Office U Soe Tint and Director- Konmyinttha here this evening. General of Protocol Department Thura U Aung Also present at the call together with the Prime Htet. — MNA Union of Myanmar Prime Minister General Khin Nyunt greets Mr PD Christ, Sale Director, Fritz Werner Industries (Germany) at Zeyathiri Beikman, Konmyinttha.—MNA At a time when friendship and cooperation between Myanmar and the People’s Republic of China are in the process of rapid development, Prime Minister General Khin Nyunt’s visit to the PRC had been able to promote the existing Paukphaw friendship to fraternal relations. During the Prime Minister’s recent visit to the PRC, prospects for enhancing cooperation in energy, hydroelectric power, mining, industrial, transport, communications and agricultural sectors were sought. PM calls for constant contact, coordination between Myanmar and PRC officials for speedy implementation of agreements YANGON, 26 July—Prime ment Council Office, heads of able to promote Paukphaw added that he met Premier Mr Minister of the Union of department and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Union Parliament Selects New President
    CRS INSIGHT Burma's Union Parliament Selects New President March 18, 2016 (IN10464) | Related Policy Issue Southeast Asia, Australasia, and the Pacific Islands Related Author Michael F. Martin | Michael F. Martin, Specialist in Asian Affairs ([email protected], 7-2199) On March 15, 2016, Burma's Union Parliament selected Htin Kyaw, childhood friend and close advisor to Aung San Suu Kyi, to serve as the nation's first President since 1962 who has not served in the military. His selection as President-Elect completes another step in the nation's five-month-long transition from a largely military-controlled government to one led by the National League for Democracy (NLD). In addition, it also marks at least a temporary end to Aung San Suu Kyi's efforts to become Burma's President and may reveal signs of growing tensions between the NLD and the Burmese military. Htin Kyaw received the support of 360 of the 652 Members of Parliament (MPs), defeating retired Lt. General Myint Swe (who received 213 votes, of which 166 were from military MPs) and Henry Na Thio (who received 79 votes). The 69-year-old President-Elect is expected to be sworn into office on March 30, 2016. Myint Swe and Henry Van Thio will serve as 1st and 2nd Vice President, respectively. On November 8, 2015, Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) won a landslide victory in nationwide parliamentary elections (see CRS Insight IN10397, Burma's Parliamentary Elections, by Michael F. Martin) that gave the party a majority of the seats in both chambers of Burma's Union Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gender Gap and Women's Political Power in Myanmar/Burma
    May 2013 The Gender Gap and Women’s Political Power in Myanmar/Burma Advances in international law have changed the face of democracy and promoted the rights of women worldwide. Unfortunately, these advances have not yet helped or improved the lives of women in Burma. Women’s rights have expanded to include rights to gender parity in all areas of governance: ceasefire discussions, peace treaty negotiations, constitution drafting committees, political parties, and equal representation in the executive, legislative and judicial branches. In Burma, over sixty years of military rule has reinforced and perpetuated discrimination against women by preventing them from achieving positions of political power. Because women are not admitted to the Defense Services (Tatmadaw), women have been ineligible for the employment, education, business, joint venture and travel opportunities created by military status. Moreover, the 2008 Constitution requires that the Defense Services appoint 25% of parliamentarians and guarantees that the Defense Forces will remain the integral and dominant political force of Burma. Therefore, the Constitution is the main obstacle preventing true equality and political power for women in Burma going forward. The timeline below illustrates the absence of women in formal power positions in Burma. Beginning in the 1980s, global advances in women’s rights helped secure increased political participation for women in many countries; unfortunately, this progress has not been felt in Burma. It is crucial for more women to be represented in the formal governing structures so that the voices of all Burmese women can be heard. Women activists staged the first strike against sex discrimination, protesting British 1927 regulations that prevented women from holding legislative positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Politics in Burma
    Appendices: Background / 13 Appendix I: Conflict and Politics in Burma APPENDICES: BACKGROUND downplayed ethnic differences. This policy of cultural assimilation has only served to create 13 APPENDIX I: CONFLICT AND resentment amongst the ethnic groups. POLITICS IN BURMA The road map to independence was finalised at the Panglong Conference in February 1947. Under “The conflict in Burma is deep rooted. Solutions can only be this agreement the Frontier Areas were guaranteed found if the real issues of conflict are examined, such as “full autonomy in internal administration”273 and the territory, resources and nationality…”270 Dr Chao-Tzang 274 Yawnghwe, Burmese academic, December 2001 enjoyment of democratic “rights and privileges”. Elections held later in 1947 were won by the Anti- Burma’s position between China and India is of key Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL), but were strategic importance being at the crossroads of Asia, boycotted by the Karen National Union and the where south, east and Southeast Asia meet. Rugged CPB,jj amongst others.275 Nevertheless, a mountain ranges form a horseshoe surrounding the constitution was drafted that aimed to create a sense fertile plains of the Irrawaddy River. In the far north, of Burmese identity and cohesiveness, whilst the 1,463 km border with China follows the line of enshrining ethnic rights and aspirations for self- the Gaoligongshan Mountains.271 These remote determination.276 However, the constitution failed to border areas are rich in natural resources including deal with the ethnic groups even-handedly and did timber, but the benefits derived from this natural not adequately address separatist concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Burma's Constitutional Process
    Chronology of Burma’s Constitutional Process February 12, 1947: While Burma is still under British colonial rule, the Panglong Agreement is signed by Burmese leader General Aung San and several ethnic nationality leaders from the Shan, Kachin, and Chin areas. The agreement is designed to hasten independence from the British and avert ethnic tensions in the new Burma, as recognized in paragraph 7 that states, “Citizens of the Frontier Areas shall enjoy rights and privileges which are regarded as fundamental in democratic societies.” July 19, 1947: General Aung San and several members of the cabinet are assassinated in Rangoon. U Nu and his Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL) prepare to take power from the British by finishing Burma’s first constitution. January 4, 1948: Burma gains independence from British rule and institutes the 1947 constitution. The new constitution and its federal structure included the Shan state, Karenni state, Kachin state, and Karen state, with the Chin Hills being classified as a “special division.” The constitution granted the right of secession to special division states after 10 years (chapter 10, articles 201-206) subject to a majority vote in the state assembly and majority in a plebiscite. March 2, 1962: The military Revolutionary Council under General Ne Win overthrows the constitutionally elected civilian government. December 15-31, 1973: The Revolutionary Council conducts a referendum to endorse the new constitution, which is carried by over 90 percent of the vote in a process that many international observers do not assess as fair. March 1974: Burma’s second constitution is implemented, transferring power from the Revolutionary Council to the Burma Socialist Program Party (BSPP).
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Transition to “Disciplined Democracy”: Abdication Or Institutionalization of Military Rule?
    Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should limit in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers serve to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior publication encourage exchange ideas and academic debate. Working GIGA GIGA Research Programme: Legitimacy and Efficiency of Political Systems ___________________________ Burma’s Transition to “Disciplined Democracy”: Abdication or Institutionalization of Military Rule? Marco Bünte No 177 August 2011 www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers GIGA WP 177/2011 GIGA Working Papers Edited by the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien The GIGA Working Papers series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. Inclusion of a paper in the GIGA Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. When working papers are eventually accepted by or published in a journal or book, the correct citation reference and, if possible, the corresponding link will then be included on the GIGA Working Papers website at <www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers>. GIGA research unit responsible for this issue: GIGA Research Programme 1: “Legitimacy and Efficiency of Political Systems” Editor of the GIGA Working Papers series: Bert Hoffmann <[email protected]> Copyright for this issue: © Marco Bünte English copy editor: Meenakshi Preisser Editorial assistant and production: Ellen Baumann All GIGA Working Papers are available online and free of charge on the website <www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers>.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister General Khin Nyunt Attends Opening of School
    Pubbe ca katapuññata, to be endowed with merits accrued in the past; this is the way to auspiciousness. Established 1914 Volume XII, Number 100 9th Waxing of Second Waso 1366 ME Sunday, 25 July, 2004 Four political objectives * Stability of the State, community peace and tranquillity, prevalence of law and order * National reconsolidation * Emergence of a new enduring State Consti- tution * Building of a new modern developed nation in accord with the new State Constitution Four economic objectives * Development of agriculture as the base and all- round development of other sectors of the economy as well * Proper evolution of the market-oriented eco- nomic system * Development of the economy inviting partici- pation in terms of technical know-how and investments from sources inside the country and abroad Prime Minister General Khin Nyunt inspects classrooms at BEPS No 15 in Thingangyun Township.— MNA * The initiative to shape the national economy must be kept in the hands of the State and the Prime Minister General Khin Nyunt national peoples Four social objectives attends opening of school buildings at * Uplift of the morale and morality of the entire nation BEPSs in Thingangyun Township * Uplift of national prestige and integrity and YANGON, 24 July — the Republic of Philippines building of BEPS No 33. the Commander, the Deputy preservation and safeguarding of cultural Chairman of Myanmar Edu- and Cambodia, departmen- Next, the Prime Minis- Minister for Construction, heritage and national character cation Committee Prime tal officials, social organi- ter and party inspected the the Deputy Minister for * Uplift of dynamism of patriotic spirit Minister General Khin zations, teachers and stu- new school building.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma (Myanmar) COI Report 2 February 2012
    BURMA (MYANMAR) COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 2 February 2012 BURMA (MYANMAR) 2 FEBRUARY 2012 Contents Preface USEFUL NEWS SOURCES FOR INFORMATION Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.08 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY (INDEPENDENCE (1948) – APRIL 2011) ........................................................ 3.01 Constitutional referendum – 2008 ....................................................................... 3.03 November 2010 elections .................................................................................... 3.05 Release of Aung San Suu Kyi ............................................................................. 3.12 Opening of Parliament ......................................................................................... 3.14 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS (MAY 2011 – JANUARY 2012) .............................................. 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 6.01 Human Rights 7. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]