DOCSLIB.ORG

Burma (Myanmar) COI Report 2 February 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burma (Myanmar) COI Report 2 February 2012 BURMA (MYANMAR) COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 2 February 2012 BURMA (MYANMAR) 2 FEBRUARY 2012 Contents Preface USEFUL NEWS SOURCES FOR INFORMATION Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.08 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY (INDEPENDENCE (1948) – APRIL 2011) ........................................................ 3.01 Constitutional referendum – 2008 ....................................................................... 3.03 November 2010 elections .................................................................................... 3.05 Release of Aung San Suu Kyi ............................................................................. 3.12 Opening of Parliament ......................................................................................... 3.14 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS (MAY 2011 – JANUARY 2012) .............................................. 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 6.01 Human Rights 7. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 7.01 8. SECURITY FORCES .................................................................................................... 8.01 Police ..................................................................................................................... 8.02 Armed forces ........................................................................................................ 8.05 Other government forces ..................................................................................... 8.11 Intelligence agencies .......................................................................................... 8.14 Human rights violations by government forces ................................................ 8.21 Convict and civilian porters ................................................................................ 8.27 Arbitrary arrest and detention ............................................................................. 8.33 Torture ................................................................................................................ 8.36 Extra-judicial killings and ‘disappearances’ ........................................................ 8.45 Avenues of complaint .......................................................................................... 8.48 9. MILITARY SERVICE .................................................................................................... 9.01 10. ABUSES BY NON-GOVERNMENT ARMED FORCES .......................................................... 10.01 Forced conscription ............................................................................................. 10.10 11. JUDICIARY ................................................................................................................ 11.01 Organisation ......................................................................................................... 11.01 Independence ....................................................................................................... 11.02 Fair trial ................................................................................................................. 11.07 Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure .................................................... 11.13 12. ARREST AND DETENTION – LEGAL RIGHTS .................................................................. 12.01 Arrest warrants ..................................................................................................... 12.08 13. PRISON CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 13.01 14. DEATH PENALTY ....................................................................................................... 14.01 15. POLITICAL AFFILIATION.............................................................................................. 15.01 Freedom of political expression.......................................................................... 15.04 Political prisoners ............................................................................................... 15.09 Freedom of association and assembly ............................................................... 15.20 Demonstrations outside of Burma ...................................................................... 15.28 Opposition groups and political activists .......................................................... 15.39 ii The main text of this COI Report contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 22 January 2012. 2 FEBRUARY 2012 BURMA (MYANMAR) National League for Democracy (NLD) .............................................................. 15.42 National Democratic Force (NDF) ...................................................................... 15.49 Dissident groups .................................................................................................. 15.52 All Burma Federation of Student Unions (ABFSU) ............................................. 15.53 All Burma Monks Alliance (ABMA) ..................................................................... 15.55 88 Generation Students ..................................................................................... 15.58 Generation Wave ............................................................................................... 15.63 16. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MEDIA ............................................................................... 16.01 Internet usage ....................................................................................................... 16.13 Journalists ............................................................................................................ 16.25 17. HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS, ORGANISATIONS AND ACTIVISTS .................................... 17.01 18. CORRUPTION ............................................................................................................ 18.01 19. FREEDOM OF RELIGION .............................................................................................. 19.01 Overview ............................................................................................................... 19.01 Demography ......................................................................................................... 19.09 Constitution and legislation ................................................................................ 19.11 Buddhism .............................................................................................................. 19.14 Christians .............................................................................................................. 19.19 Muslims ................................................................................................................. 19.26 20. ETHNIC GROUPS ....................................................................................................... 20.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 20.23 Chin (Zomi) ........................................................................................................... 20.24 Kachin .................................................................................................................. 20.28 Karen and Karenni (Red Karen or Kayah) .......................................................... 20.36 Mon ........................................................................................................................ 20.41 Rakhine (Arakanese) ............................................................................................ 20.44 Rohingya ............................................................................................................... 20.47 Shan ....................................................................................................................... 20.54 21. LESBIAN, GAY AND BISEXUAL (LGB) PERSONS ........................................................... 21.01 Legal rights ........................................................................................................... 21.01 Treatment by, and attitude of, state authorities ................................................. 21.06 Societal treatment and attitudes ......................................................................... 21.08 22. TRANSGENDER PERSONS .......................................................................................... 22.01 23. DISABILITY ............................................................................................................... 23.01 24. WOMEN ................................................................................................................... 24.01 Overview ............................................................................................................... 24.01 Legal rights ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • B U R M a B U L L E T
    B U R M A B U L L E T I N ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞A month-in-review of events in Burma∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞ A L T E R N A T I V E A S E A N N E T W O R K O N B U R M A campaigns, advocacy & capacity-building for human rights & democracy Issue 20 August 2008 • Fearing a wave of demonstrations commemorating th IN THIS ISSUE the 20 anniversary of the nationwide uprising, the SPDC embarks on a massive crackdown on political KEY STORY activists. The regime arrests 71 activists, including 1 August crackdown eight NLD members, two elected MPs, and three 2 Activists arrested Buddhist monks. 2 Prison sentences • Despite the regime’s crackdown, students, workers, 3 Monks targeted and ordinary citizens across Burma carry out INSIDE BURMA peaceful demonstrations, activities, and acts of 3 8-8-8 Demonstrations defiance against the SPDC to commemorate 8-8-88. 4 Daw Aung San Suu Kyi 4 Cyclone Nargis aid • Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is allowed to meet with her 5 Cyclone camps close lawyer for the first time in five years. She also 5 SPDC aid windfall receives a visit from her doctor. Daw Suu is rumored 5 Floods to have started a hunger strike. 5 More trucks from China • UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Burma HUMAN RIGHTS 5 Ojea Quintana goes to Burma Tomás Ojea Quintana makes his first visit to the 6 Rape of ethnic women country. The SPDC controls his meeting agenda and restricts his freedom of movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Long Road to Democracy
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Priscilla Clapp A career officer in the U.S. Foreign Service, Priscilla Clapp served as U.S. chargé d’affaires and chief of mission in Burma (Myanmar) from June 1999 to August 2002. After retiring from the Foreign Service, she has continued to Burma’s Long Road follow events in Burma closely and wrote a paper for the United States Institute of Peace entitled “Building Democracy in Burma,” published on the Institute’s Web site in July 2007 as Working Paper 2. In this Special to Democracy Report, the author draws heavily on her Working Paper to establish the historical context for the Saffron Revolution, explain the persistence of military rule in Burma, Summary and speculate on the country’s prospects for political transition to democracy. For more detail, particularly on • In August and September 2007, nearly twenty years after the 1988 popular uprising the task of building the institutions for stable democracy in Burma, public anger at the government’s economic policies once again spilled in Burma, see Working Paper 2 at www.usip.org. This into the country’s city streets in the form of mass protests. When tens of thousands project was directed by Eugene Martin, and sponsored by of Buddhist monks joined the protests, the military regime reacted with brute force, the Institute’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention. beating, killing, and jailing thousands of people. Although the Saffron Revolution was put down, the regime still faces serious opposition and unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8, Control and Resistance, Attacks on Burmese Opposition Media
    8 Control and Resistance Attacks on Burmese Opposition Media Nart Villeneuve and Masashi Crete-Nishihata Burma is consistently identifi ed by human rights organizations as one of the world ’ s most repressive regimes. Human rights violations occur with regularity, especially in connection with the country ’ s long-standing armed confl ict. The ruling military junta, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), is best known for its political pris- oners and its systematic denial of universal human rights such as freedom of expres- sion. 1 The government ’ s efforts to silence dissent pervade cyberspace and its system of Internet control is one of the most restrictive in Asia. Despite the heavy hand that the regime wields over cyberspace, information com- munication technologies (ICTs) have provided Burmese opposition groups with the means to broadcast their message to the world and challenge the government. The ongoing battle between these two sides makes Burma a stark example of contested Asian cyberspace. The role of ICTs in this struggle can be framed by contrasting theo- ries that view them either as “ liberation technologies ” that can empower grassroots political movements 2 or as tools that authoritarian governments can use to suppress these very same mobilizations. 3 This contestation is dramatically illustrated by the series of protests that erupted across the country in 2007 — in a movement popularly known as the “ Saffron Revolu- tion. ” During these protests, Burmese activists managed to bring the uprising to the world ’ s attention by making images and videos of the demonstrations and subsequent government crackdown available on the Internet. Realizing the potential political impact of these images, the government severed Internet connectivity in the country for nearly two weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Reverberations from Regime Shake-Up in Rangoon.Qxd
    Asia-PacificAsia-Pacific SecuritySecurity SStudiestudies RegionalRegional ReverberationsReverberations fromfrom RegimeRegime Shake-upShake-up inin RangoonRangoon Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Volume 4 - Number 1, January 2005 Key Findings The reverberations from the recent regime shake-up in Rangoon continue to be felt in regional capitals. Since prime minister Khin Nyunt was the chief architect of closer China-Burma strategic ties, his sudden removal has been interpret- ed as a major setback for China's strategic goals in Burma. Dr. Mohan Malik is a Professor with the Asia-Pacific Center for However, an objective assessment of China's strategic and eco- Security Studies. nomic needs and Burma's predicament shows that Beijing is His work focuses main- unlikely to easily give up what it has already gained in and ly on Asian Geopolitics through Burma. From China's perspective, Burma should be and Proliferation in Asia-Pacific region. His satisfied to gain a powerful friend, a permanent member of the most recent APCSS UN Security Council, and an economic superpower that comes publication is “India-China Relations: bearing gifts of much needed military hardware, economic aid, Giants Stir, Cooperate infrastructure projects and diplomatic support. and Compete ” The fact remains that ASEAN, India and Japan cannot compete with China either in providing military assistance, diplomatic support or in offering trade and investment benefits. With the UN-brokered talks on political reconciliation having reached a dead end, it might be worthwhile to start afresh with a dia- logue framework of ASEAN+3 (ASEAN plus China, India and Japan) on Burma. This would also put to test China's oft-stated commitment to multi- lateralism and Beijing's penchant for "Asian solutions to Asian problems".
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006
    Burma Page 1 of 24 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Burma Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Since 1962, Burma, with an estimated population of more than 52 million, has been ruled by a succession of highly authoritarian military regimes dominated by the majority Burman ethnic group. The current controlling military regime, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), led by Senior General Than Shwe, is the country's de facto government, with subordinate Peace and Development Councils ruling by decree at the division, state, city, township, ward, and village levels. In 1990 prodemocracy parties won more than 80 percent of the seats in a generally free and fair parliamentary election, but the junta refused to recognize the results. Twice during the year, the SPDC convened the National Convention (NC) as part of its purported "Seven-Step Road Map to Democracy." The NC, designed to produce a new constitution, excluded the largest opposition parties and did not allow free debate. The military government totally controlled the country's armed forces, excluding a few active insurgent groups. The government's human rights record worsened during the year, and the government continued to commit numerous serious abuses. The following human rights abuses were reported: abridgement of the right to change the government extrajudicial killings, including custodial deaths disappearances rape, torture, and beatings of
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/BURMA MONTHLY ATMOSPHERIC REPORT January 2020
    USAID/BURMA MONTHLY ATMOSPHERIC REPORT January 2020 Contract Number: 72048218C00004 Myanmar Analytical Activity Acknowledgement This report has been written by Kimetrica LLC (www.kimetrica.com) and Mekong Economics (www.mekongeconomics.com) as part of the Myanmar Analytical Activity, and is therefore the exclusive property of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Melissa Earl (Kimetrica) is the author of this report and reachable at [email protected] or at Kimetrica LLC, 80 Garden Center, Suite A-368, Broomfield, CO 80020. The author’s views in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. USAID.GOV DECEMBER 2019 MONTHLY ATMOSPHERIC REPORT | 1 JANUARY 2020 AT A GLANCE Myanmar’s ICOE Finds Insufficient Evidence of Genocide. The ICOE admits there is evidence that Tatmadaw soldiers committed individual war crimes, but rules there is no evidence of a systematic effort to destroy the Rohingya people. (Page 1) The ICJ Rules Myanmar Must Take Measures to Protect the Rohingya From Acts of Genocide. International observers laud the ruling as a major step toward fighting genocide globally, but reactions to the ruling in Myanmar are mixed. (Page 2) Fortify Rights Documents Five Cases of Rohingya IDPs Forced to Accept NVCs. The international community and the Rohingya condemned the cards, saying they are a means to keep the Rohingya from obtaining full citizenship rights by identifying them as “Bengali,” not Rohingya. (Page 3) During the Chinese President’s State Visit to Myanmar, the Two Countries Signed Multiple MoUs. The 33 MoUs that President Xi Jinping cosigned are related to infrastructure, trade, media, and urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • F-Burma News
    BURMA CAMPAIGN NEWS www.burmacampaign.org.uk WINTER 2005 ISSUE 10 Shop at amazon.co.uk and earn money for The Burma Campaign! Buy any item at amazon.co.uk via our website Shop + and The Burma Campaign will receive a percentage of what you pay. Earn Through their Associates Programme, amazon.co.uk pays a cash commission for any sales they receive from the links on our website. So whenever you need any books, music, films, games or gifts, remember to visit www.burmacampaign.org.uk first and enter amazon.co.uk from the link on our website. Visit www.burmacampaign.org.uk/merchandise.html Did you know that you could raise money for us while talking on the phone? And cut your phone bill Five good reasons to choose the Phone Co-op: We have joined up with the Phone Co-op to offer you a great deal on your telephone calls. By using the Phone Co-op, you 1. More than just calls: Broadband from save money, and help us to raise funds, as we receive 6% of £18.99 and line rentals are also available. the value of your calls. 2. Easy to set up: It’s easy to switch and you keep your BT or cable line. That is 60p for every £10 you spend. 3. Easy to access: Call their customer service and you’ll immediately have a With four different options, we guarantee you will find the ‘real person’ on the line. most convenient one for you! You can save up to 48% on 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Censorship on the Development of the Private Press Industry in Myanmar/Burma
    Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper University of Oxford The Impact of Censorship on the Development of the Private Press Industry in Myanmar/Burma by Kyaw Thu Michaelmas 2011 & Hilary 2012 Sponsor: Thomson Reuters Foundation 1 Acknowledgements This study would not have been possible without the support of several people who have generously assisted me throughout my study. First and foremost, I would like to thank the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) and the Thomson Reuters Foundation for giving me the valuable opportunity to study at the University of Oxford. I would like to thank James Painter and Dr. Peter Bajomi-Lazar for their good guidance and encouragement. I also thank RISJ director David Levy and staff at the RISJ - Sara Kalim, Alex Reid, Rebecca Edwards and Kate Hanneford-Smith - for their support during my fellowship period. In addition, I would to thank Professor Robert H. Taylor and Dr. Peter Pritchard for their useful advice. Last but not least, I would like to thank my fellow journalists from Myanmar for participating in my survey and the publishers who gave me interviews for this research paper. Information on the use of country name The use of the country name of Myanmar has been controversial among the international community since the military government changed the names of the country and cities in 1988. From that point on, Burma officially became Myanmar and Rangoon became Yangon. In this paper, I will use Burma when I refer to the period before the junta changed the name and use Myanmar for the later period.
    [Show full text]
  • LAST MONTH in BURMA JAN News from and About Burma 2009
    LAST MONTH IN BURMA JAN News from and about Burma 2009 Rohingya refugees forced out to sea by Thai authorities The Thai government faced international condemnation after reports that Thai authorities forcibly expelled Rohingya boat people, towing them out to sea and setting them adrift. Around 1000 Rohingya refugees and asylum seekers, fleeing persecution in Burma and squalid living conditions in Bangladesh, were intercepted by the Thai navy in December 2008. They were subsequently towed into international waters in boats without engines and with little food and water. Hundreds are feared drowned, others were rescued off the coast of India and Indonesia, some claiming to have been beaten by Thai soldiers. The Rohingya are a mainly Muslim ethnic Rohingya refugees apprehended by the Thai authorities. group in western Burma. They are subjected to (Photo: Royal Thai Navy) systematic, persistent and widespread human rights violations by the ruling military regime, including denial of citizenship rights, severe restrictions of freedom of movement and arbitrary arrests. Ethnic groups reject 2010 elections of civilian government.” The Minister also stated The Kachin Independence Organization and the that; “We will continue to give our full support to the Kachin National Organization have stated they will UN Secretary General and his efforts to break the not take part in the 2010 elections. Colonel Lamang current deadlock.” Brang Seng, a spokesperson for the KNO, told Mizzima News, “We don’t think the election will be “The 2010 elections could be the freest and fairest free and fair,” and added that the elections and the in the world, but it would make little difference as junta’s roadmap are designed to further entrench the constitution they bring in keeps the dictatorship military rule in Burma.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 While the Military Junta That Ruled Burma For
    FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net 2012 1 BURMA 2011 2012 POPULATION: 55 million Not Not INTERNET FREEDOM STATUS INTERNET PENETRATION 2011: 1 percent Free Free WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS BLOCKED: Yes Obstacles to Access (0-25) 23 22 NOTABLE POLITICAL CENSORSHIP: Yes Limits on Content (0-35) 29 23 BLOGGERS/ICT USERS ARRESTED: Yes Violations of User Rights (0-40) 36 30 PRESS FREEDOM STATUS: Not Free Total (0-100) 88 75 * 0=most free, 100=least free NTRODUCTION I While the military junta that ruled Burma for decades was interested in expanding information and communication technologies (ICTs) for business and propaganda purposes, it also made aggressive attempts to restrict access to digital media and control online content. Elections in November 2010 changed this dynamic. Though widely condemned as flawed, the polls brought into office a nominally civilian government, led by former general Thein Sein and supported by a military-backed party, in March 2011. Since then, the political landscape has opened somewhat, with positive implications for internet freedom. Previously censored news websites have been unblocked, citizens imprisoned for their online activities have been released, and opposition political parties have been able to use online tools to mobilize supporters. Nevertheless, significant obstacles to greater internet freedom persist. Harsh media laws remain in effect and could be used at any time to punish a wide range of online expression, the technical censorship system appears intact, and some opposition blogs continue to be blocked. Consumer prices for ICTs are still among the highest in the world. Meanwhile, even as some members of the government and private sector begin to explore reforms to the telecommunications sector, new challenges have emerged, including weak coordination between different agencies and resistance from the military and government cronies who have lucrative vested interests in retaining the status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION REPORT with Half Page
    Election Report, 2010 Myanmar (Burma) Pre-Election Observations By Burma News International 1 Contents Acknowledgement List of Acronyms………………………………………………………. 6 Introduction…………………………………………………………….. 8 Methodology…………………………………………………………… 10 I.General Overview…………………………………………………… 11 II. Electoral Frame Work……………………………………………… 18 III. Election Administration III.a. Union Election Commission………………………….. 30 III.b. Political Parties………………………………………... 33 III.c. Political Parties Contesting in States and Regions…………………………………………… 40 III.d.Individual Candidates…………………………………. 48 III.e. Cancellation of Constituencies……………………… 51 III.f. Population and Eligible Voters………………………. 52 III.g. Voting Procedure……………………………………... 54 IV. Voter Education and Campaign…………………………………. 56 V. Human Rights, Border Guard Force…………………………….. 62 VI. Irregularities……………………………………………………….. 67 VII. Complaints………………………………………………………… 69 VIII. Observations on Challenges…………………………………… 77 Conclusion……………………………………………………………... 80 Appendix……………………………………………………………….. 82 References…………………………………………………………….. 112 2 Acknowledgements BNI is pleased to present this Pre-election report, which is a compilation of BNI member’s pre-election content, including news, features, photos, video and media releases. This report is a synthesis of accounts and reports by BNI members and its stringers deployed nationwide. It is based on interviews, research and observations of the conditions that prevailed during the pre-election period. BNI also wishes to express its profound gratitude to BNI staff for their kind efforts in writing and editing this report, and thank BNI members for their moral support and resources made available to the BNI election team. BNI also wishes to express its heartfelt thanks to The Open Society Institute for its unwavering support in realizing BNI’s efforts to support the democratization process during Burma’s 2010 election. And, we wish to extend our thanks to all the donors who assist us in this project and who continue to support the monitoring activities of BNI.
    [Show full text]
  • NYU/CIC Draft Report
    Pathways to Change Baseline Study to Identify Theories of Change on Political Settlements and Confidence Building By Molly Elgin-Cossart, Bruce Jones, and Jane Esberg July 31, 2012 This is one part of a two-part preliminary study. It is designed to excavate, through interviews with development field staff, perspectives and story lines on how international actors (especially development actors) can influence the degree of inclusiveness of political settlements. This is an interim step to a longer-term, more comprehensive study to assess the causal relationship between donor programming and political settlements. The purpose of this initial study is to narrow the field of inquiry by providing ‘theories of change’ that can then be tested. A cognate study, more conceptually oriented, focuses on political settlements (defined below) that follow violence or episodes or imminent threatened violence, to provide an exegesis of the argument that ‘inclusive enough’ settlements matter to stability and thus development in fragile states. That study is designed to help establish a research agenda that could test and refine that proposition. Prepared with support from the UK Department for International Development, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Carnegie Corporation. 1 Preface ........................................................................................................................... 3 Background: Why an emphasis on inclusive political settlements? ........................... 4 Research approach .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]