Delft University of Technology

Gateway Sloterdijk 2050

Triggianese, Manuela; Kuipers, Tom

Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Published in Stations as Nodes

Citation (APA) Triggianese, M., & Kuipers, T. (2018). Gateway Sloterdijk 2050. In M. Triggianese , R. Cavallo, B. Nacima, & J. Kuijper (Eds.), Stations as Nodes: Exploring the role of stations in future metropolitan areas from a French and Dutch perspective (pp. 195-197). TU Delft Open. https://books.bk.tudelft.nl/index.php/press/catalog/book/682 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above.

Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. major opportunity to support the City of of City the support to opportunity major a is area Sloterdijk the of development (re) the , of metropolis global fast-growing the in hub mobility major a as and character urban multifaced ing else?into something Due interest to its converted be to have building the Does business zonebusiness character, and industrial atypical with area urban amulti-layered of core the at Situated s r e p i Ku m To TriggianeseManuela Gateway Sloterdijk 2050 Group B vision for a port city, published in 2017. in published city, aport for vision new Amsterdam’s of City the of part also is centrum Sloterdijk facilities. public and hotels housing, more realize to wants ity municipal the where area an in and torway mo the to next located is building station The nature. and culture between gradient’ ‘east-west an as to referred is Brettenzone the 2040, Amsterdam Vision Structure the For Havengebied). Westelijk (the industry and Cities) Garden (Western area dential aresi between division green functional a as 1934, of Plan Expansion General his in Eesteren van Cornelis planner master by included already was Brettenzone The Spaarnwoude. to Westerpark the from ly horizontal runs that area the Brettenzone), (or Brettenpark the of heart the at placed also is It ). or (north-west II Sloterdijk and area) West Nieuwe the as known also (south-west, tre), cen city the towards (south-east, Lommer and Bos harbour), the facing (north-east, I Sloterdijk districts: different four of tion intersec the at located is station Sloterdijk in a Fragmented Area aFragmented in Node An Infrastructural 1 Amsterdam Amsterdam Sebastiaan van Niele, Niele, van Sebastiaan Tom van Vilsteren Wiginton,ć, Jolien Kramer, Cherkaoui ElBaraka, Cveti Salwa Ana group Flore, :Isabella Sabrina Lindsay Menger, Gatti, Benedetta 2

------only zero-emission vehicles by 2030 vehicles zero-emission only have to aim city’s the with align and hicles ve automated from increase traffic future prevent to modes single-use over shared favour should Policy mode. first/last-mile main the as bikes with system transport the of spine the be must transit mass Sloterdijk. at parking and crossing currently are cars and metro train, bike, long-distances), (for integrated mobility system. Tram, buses interesting avery with node a multimodal is Sloterdijk that clear becomes it tions), connec exterior the and layout interior (the building station the of layers different (escalators).connections Looking at the vertical new and bicycles for facilities ing park new station, Sloterdijk at example for situation: this overcome to ProRail ager man Railway Dutch by the planned been has investments of number large a flows, cessibility, safety measures and passenger ac improve to order in and a consequence, day. As every station the through pass will people 110,000 about 2030 in while node, the visit 50,000 around today station, Sloterdijk At 300,000. be will that day, 2030 in per passengers 185,000 counts now Station Central Amsterdam future. near the in records break will number this and years, many for rise the on been has Amsterdam in stations big all in passengers train urban place. dense and avibrant creating while bility, mo future and supply housing tourism, on objectives policy major Amsterdam’s of a new strategy for Sloterdik Centrum Centrum Sloterdik for strategy anew of development the for goals primary The Tourism for Port Main When considering mobility transitions, of number the time, same At the . ------

Research through Education: Amsterdam Sloterdijk 195 196 the flows of passengers to and through the the through and to passengers of flows the major changes infrastructural to improve proposes strategy the time, Over station. the at activities and programmes new lish estab to required mass critical the build will development, residential new of phase first the with combined This, station. the to traffic, bus international and groups bus tour particularly visitors, of flows directing the station. for developed be will identity aunique and unified, be will surroundings its and station the of design The centres. city prominent Amsterdam’s of one becoming network, mobility and acultural in key point a major to node atransport as state current its from evolve will station train Sloterdijk the sion, vi this To alike. support residents future and commuters tourists, for agateway as Sloterdijk 2050 Gateway strategy, proposed the analysis, comparative this of results the on Based centre. city Amsterdam’s with comparison in area Sloterdijk the of planning project the to related threats and opportunities es, weakness strengths, by identifying nique, tech planning strategic SWOT analysis, a with process design and research the group). (target visitors and inhabitants future the and station the of ers definedurban character, amore with a‘place’ as node the redevelop to and flows, pedestrian seamless current facilitating place, urban afragmented in node the of integrity the reinforce to are: In the near future, the strategy proposes proposes strategy the future, near the In started professionals young of A group , envisions the Sloterdijk area area Sloterdijk the , envisions 3 for the current us current the for - - - - - new realities. to adaptation and uses flexible for room leaves and unpredictable is future the that recognizes plan phasing The modes. shared new and transit mass of expansion an accommodate to time over transformed be will lot) parking the as (such structure door public space. Legacy infra transport out and indoor the overhaul and stations – – – – – – time. over station the for role evolving an and phasing proposes strategy the tal, incremen be will change that Recognizing space. public aliveable emphasize and users, all for accessibility promote modes), and volume in (growth mobility future for main port for Netherlands tourism, plan a as Sloterdijk establish principles: ing follow by the guided solutions design proposes policy and 2050 Sloterdijk Gateway Marketing to new types of tourists of types new to Marketing mobility sustainable use to tourists Equip centre information tourism Establish Improve Flixbus depot Sloterdijk to depot bus tour Relocate Retain and improve Flixbus depot tourism (2018–2030)tourism Netherlands for port Main Solutions Design-Driven and Instruments Policy Niele, Tom van Vilsteren Tom van Niele, van Sebastiaan Baraka, El Cherkaoui Salwa Kramer, Cveti Ana ton, Wigin Lindsay Gatti, etta Sabrina Menger, Bened Flore, Isabella by imagery Scenario made by Group B ▼▶ , Jolien ć, Jolien ------– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – New bike parking bike New Redirect flows passenger Increased volumes for pedestrian, transit, Redirect flows passenger canal at service Ferry station sides both from access Bikes unification to fragmented From starting mean would this terms design In flexibility usage, various for spaces Open Green space and play for amenities with space Public Indoor/outdoor public space space the across Views space public the of Unification abridge with 10 9and platform Link + in spots various located Bike parking gradually out phased are Cars buses touring Accommodation for +500 con line train and metro new Establish lanes drop-off to spaces parking Convert each station at parking of cost Increase in options bike-sharing and car- Expand in parking car private eliminate or Limit Develop new demonstration mobility Future mobility (2018–2050)Future mobility (2030–2050) Liveable space public flows (2030–2050) passenger Accommodating future cycling reorganization the of modes from for future needs relaxation underground nections gle-occupancy) sin (de-emphasize mobility shared for chargers tric elec build to revenue new use and year station at and buildings new new buildings BMW, Nissan) instance (for employers Havenstad with partnership in centre - - - – – , vol. 14 (1999) no. 2, 199–210. 2, no. 14 (1999) tice and Research, vol. Prac Planning Netherlands’, the in Model Analytical an of Application The Transport: Public and Patterns Development ‘Spatial Bertolini, L. read: please model, Node-Place the about information more For theory. ment) Develop (Transit-Oriented TOD on based was it and Bertolini Luca by developed was model Node-Place The at: https://www.amsterdam.nl/projecten/haven-stad/. available is document full The subareas. 12 of development (re) and intensification the of consists vision Haven-Stad weekvanhetlegegebouw.nl/sloterdijk-toen-nu-straks/.http://www. see: information, more For offices. for tion adestina Sloterdijk made project 1986 The not only a place ‘to pass through’. pass ‘to aplace only not and be’ ‘to aplace facilities, urban and port trans of acombination becoming are they how places, our mobility for rethinking opportunity agreat is This increase. to ue contin will and increased has modes bility mo between competition the and service ametro-type towards tending are works net suburban and urban time, same At the come. to visitors the for uses flexible and services alternative offering community, urban adense in centres, Amsterdam’s of one become will Sloterdijk node, tural infrastruc an being From region. its and Amsterdam of city the for district, the of future the for role prominent its with along enhanced, be will itself reinvent to station the of capability the strategy, proposed the With time. over evolved already has station Sloterdijk Amsterdam of role The – – – Parking converted to e-car, e-bus and and e-bus e-car, to converted Parking east over platform and entrance New Improve station access and flows and access station Improve spacepublic Unified (indoor/outdoor) side east tracks Covering Master Plan Master 3 2 1 Notes Future Unpredictable aFlexible and for Room shared mobility drop-off area drop-off mobility shared tracks ------

Research through Education: Amsterdam Sloterdijk 197