DOCSLIB.ORG

Research in Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research in Education Letter Name Learning in Early Childhood Literacy Letter naming is a strong predictor (along with phonological awareness) of phonics acquisition and reading fluency (Evans, Bell, Shaw, Moretti, & Page, 2006; National Reading Panel, 2000; Treiman, Weatherston, & Berch, 1994; Stage, Shepard, Davidson, & Browning, 2001). Letter Name Learning is a Constrained Reading Skill. Scope – Finite set of 26 letters (52 with upper and lower case) Learning curve is steep Time period is relatively brief Importance – Centrality to process of becoming a reader Typicality of the process of becoming a reader Range of Influence Limited to the process of developing decoding automaticity Found in the earliest stages of literacy development Letter Name Learning is a Constrained Reading Skill Unequal Learning – Some letter names and sounds are learned more easily, quickly and deeply than others. Result of unequal exposure rates to letter names and sounds. Mastery – Letter name learning is mastered early, quickly and completely. Universality – Letter name learning needs to be learned by all learners. Letter name learning is composed of identical information or learning elements. Letter Name Learning is a Constrained Reading Skill Codependency Previously reported positive correlations between “constrained” early reading skills and later acquisition of “unconstrained” reading skills are not shown to remain stable at later points in reading development or skill acquisition. Letter Name Learning time should be constrained Letter name learning is not the end-all, be-all of early literacy instruction. Copious amounts of instructional time also be allocated for students to build rich networks of world knowledge and word meanings . Six Stances or Guided Principles for Letter Name Learning 1. Letter name learning is both universal and important for young students. Because of this, letter name instruction is vital for young students to learn to make progress in early reading. 2. Letter name learning is a “constrained” reading skill. Because of this fact, instructional time and attention given to letter name learning should be similarly constrained to allow for other learning to take place. 3. Letter names are learned “unequally.” Because of this classroom letter name instruction should give increased time and attention to those letters that are learned less easily and quickly. Six Stances or Guided Principles for Letter Name Learning 4. Letter name learning should be taught regularly to promote students’ complete mastery of the entire set of 26 letter names and the commonly associated letter sounds in kindergarten and first-grade. 5. Letter name learning has a limited range of influence and because of this is codependent with learning other constrained and unconstrained reading skills. Teachers should assure that the reading instruction program gives adequate attention to learning phonemic awareness, concepts about print, word meanings, and listening comprehension. 6. Letter name learning requires students to actively process a variety of information about letters including recognition of letter forms (upper and lower case), formation of letters in writing, and the speech sounds commonly associated with specific letters. Theories and Research Reutzel, D. R. (In Press, 2015). Inside Track - Early Literacy Research: Findings Primary Grade Teachers Will Want to Know. The Reading Teacher, 70, xxx- xxx. Jones, C. D., & Reutzel, D. R. (2012). Enhanced alphabet knowledge instruction: Exploring a change of frequency, focus, and distributed cycles of review. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 33(5), 448-464. Jones, C. D., Reutzel, D. R., & Clark, S. K. (2012). Enhancing alphabet knowledge instruction: Research implications and practical strategies for early childhood educators. Early Childhood Education Journal. DOI 10.1007/s10643-012-0534-9. Justice, L. M., Pence, K., Bowles, R. B., & Wiggins, A. (2006). An investigation of four hypotheses concerning the order by which 4-year-old children learn the alphabet letters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 374–389. National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Piasta, S. B. & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta- Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 45(1), pp. 8-38. Multi-Componential Letter Name Instruction is the Most Powerful and Effective sounds graphic image name critical features transcription categories discrimination Discriminate this symbol from others Categories into Recognize which this graphic symbol can be symbol sorted Name the Motor codes symbol used in transcription Paired Made from Associated Associates: x number of sound Objects critical Pictures features Pattern Recognition Theories Template Matching Theory Prototype Matching Theory Critical Feature Analysis Theory Template Matching Theory Is there a match? D Template for upper-case D What the eye sees. in the brain. Prototype Matching Theory Does the prototype look like this letter? Flexible, Prototype What the eye sees. for upper-case D in the brain. Critical Feature Analysis Theory All letters are analyzed into and constructed a small set of critical features shown below . | / \ Critical Feature Analysis Theory Shared critical features make some letters confusable. Young children don’t understand the identity change that occurs in the 2 dimensional print world. Unlike their previous 3 dimensional object world experience. d p b m n u This doesn’t mean kids are dyslexic! What does research have to say about factors that affect how young children learn letter names and sounds? Research has shown that learning letter names is facilitated through six different “advantages” (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006): Own-Name Advantage (where letters occur in children’s names) Alphabetic order (where letters are taught in alpha order) Letter pronunciation effect (where the sound of the letter is also in the name) Letter frequency effect (letters that occur most frequently in written language) Consonant Phoneme Acquisition order effect (order of sounds the child first learns to articulate in oral language. Letter Writing Advantage : (where explicit letter formation is taught and practiced) Research has shown that learning letter names can be facilitated in a variety of ways (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006): Letters that occur in children’s names (Krech, 2000) Research has shown that learning letter names can be facilitated in a variety of ways (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006): Alphabetic order Teaching the Alphabet as a serial list in order can lead to “list learning effects” as shown by the bowed serial position curve below: Figure 1 Using Alphabetic Order and Read Aloud Reading aloud alphabet books and discussing S letters (Brabham, Murray, and Bowden, 2006). o r t Singing and writing alphabet songs can be used to B o support children’s learning of letter names (Smith, o k s 2000). b y : Research has shown that learning letter names can be facilitated in a variety of ways (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006): Letter name pronunciation effect (where the sound of the letter is also in the name) in Naming the Letters Saying the names of letters not only reinforces the names of letters but also many of the sounds (except g (hard g sound), h, q, w & y): Vowels – a, e, i, o, & u Consonants – b, c, d, f, j, k, l, m, n, p, q, r, s, t, v, x, z Letters where the sound of the letter is at the beginning of the letter names are learned easiest, then at the end of the letter names, and then not in the letter names (Treiman, et al., 1994; 1997; 1998; 2003). Research has shown that learning letter names can be facilitated in a variety of ways (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006): Letter frequency effect (how often letters are found in written or printed language) Using Letter Frequency (Fry, 2004) Consonants in order of frequency: r, t, n, s, l, c, d, p, m, b, f, v, g, h, k, w, th, sh, ng, ch, x, z, j, qu, wh, y Vowels in order of frequency: Short i, a, e, schwa, long o & e, short u & o, long a, u, & i, r controlled a & o, ou, oo, oi, air, ar Research has shown that learning letter names can be facilitated in a variety of ways (Justice, Pence, Bowles & Wiggins, 2006) Consonant Phoneme Acquisition order effect (order of sounds the child first learns to articulate in oral language. Using Consonant Phoneme Acquisition Order: Normative, developmental order of consonant phoneme acquisition includes the consonant phonemes of n, m, p, h, t, k, y, f, ng, b, d, g w, and s during the first four years . The consonant phonemes acquired after age 4 include: l, r, v, z, sh, ch, j, zh, and th (voiced sound as in that and unvoiced sound as in think). Writing the Letters Explicit teaching and guided practice of letter forms facilitates writing and letter naming fluency (Graham, Harris & Fink, 2000; Schlagal, 2007). Writing the Letters Short daily practice sessions are most effective Teacher demonstrations of how to form a letter while describing how it is formed is best for younger children. Writing the Letters Copying or tracing a letter from a correct model is helpful for children’s practice. When doing this children should use a “look, say, cover, write, check” technique. Using pictographs in story or song-based instruction for introducing letters such as is found in the British Letterland approach is helpful. Letter Dictation Supplies needed: Markers, pencils, or other writing supplies, gel boards, white boards, kleenslates, etc. for choral response or lined/numbered paper. Stop watch or wrist watch with second hand. Dictate random letters using upper and lower case. Begin slowly about 10 seconds per letter. Increase speed during the year. www.kleenslate.com What does recent research say about the instructional pacing and review of letter names and sounds? Breaking the Letter a Week Tradition Teaching a letter a week in Kindergarten is a long standing tradition. But the real question is this – “Is it effective to teach a letter a week?” Letter a week must be effective to some degree otherwise teachers would abandon the practice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Words Should Be Fun: Scrabble As a Tool for Language Preservation in Tuvan and Other Local Languages1
    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 213-230 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4480 Words should be fun: Scrabble as a tool for language preservation in Tuvan and other local languages1 Vitaly Voinov The University of Texas at Arlington One small but practical way of empowering speakers of an endangered language to maintain their language’s vitality amidst a climate of rapid globalization is to introduce a mother-tongue version of the popular word game Scrabble into their society. This paper examines how versions of Scrabble have been developed and used for this purpose in various endangered or non-prestige languages, with a focus on the Tuvan language of south Siberia, for which the author designed a Tuvan version of the game. Playing Scrab- ble in their mother tongue offers several benefits to speakers of an endangered language: it presents a communal approach to group literacy, promotes the use of a standardized orthography, creates new opportunities for intergenerational transmission of the language, expands its domains of usage, and may heighten the language’s external and internal prestige. Besides demonstrating the benefits of Scrabble, the paper also offers practical suggestions concerning both linguistic factors (e.g., choice of letters to be included, cal- culation of letter frequencies, dictionary availability) and non-linguistic factors (board de- sign, manufacturing, legal issues, etc.) relevant to producing Scrabble in other languages for the purpose of revitalization. 1. INTRODUCTION.2 The past several decades have seen globalization penetrating even the most remote corners of the world, bringing with them popular American exports such as Coca-Cola and Hollywood movies.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions These Questions Are in a Specific Order. 1. What Is Scrabble
    Questions Re: The Game of Scrabble Radio Interview - 14th March 2019 - 2AIRFM These questions are in a specific order. 1. What is Scrabble? 2:30 sec. 2. Who invented it? 1:40 sec 3. Why is it called Scrabble? 30 sec 4. Why play Scrabble? 1:30 sec 5. Why should I join a Scrabble Club? 2:30 sec 6. What dictionary should I use? 3:00 mins. 7. Why are there weird words in the Scrabble Dictionary? 3:00 mins 8. What should I know? 2:30 sec 9. What is a good score in Scrabble? 1 min 10. How can I improve my Scrabble score? 1 min 11. How did you get interested in Scrabble? 1 min That’s eleven questions the volume has been turned up to 11! These are some suggestions for songs to be played between breaks:- Words of love – the Beatles G.L.O.R.I.A. - Them featuring Van Morrison Words - the Bee Gees V.A.C.A.T.I.O.N. - Connie Francis Words - Neil Young D.I.V.O.R.C.E. - Tammy Wynette https://soundcloud.com/user147680538/community-interview-14th-march-2019 1. What is Scrabble? The game of Scrabble has been around since 1933 in one form or another in Western society, so I’ve always thought that everyone would have least heard of it. It wasn’t until recently that I realised there are people out there who don’t know what it is. Oddly enough, one of my relatives who is a very worldly character having run various clubs in his day, whom you would have thought was very knowledgeable brought this fact home to me, he was unaware of what it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Consonants, Vowels and Letter Frequency Stephen J
    This article was downloaded by:[Canadian Research Knowledge Network] On: 8 January 2008 Access Details: [subscription number 789349985] Publisher: Psychology Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Language and Cognitive Processes Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713683153 Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency Stephen J. Lupker a; Manuel Perea b; Colin J. Davis c a University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada b Universitat de València, València, Spain c Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK Online Publication Date: 01 January 2008 To cite this Article: Lupker, Stephen J., Perea, Manuel and Davis, Colin J. (2008) 'Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency', Language and Cognitive Processes, 23:1, 93 - 116 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/01690960701579714 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579714 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Frequency Analysis of Languages Using Latin Alphabet
    International Linguistics Research; Vol. 1, No. 1; 2018 ISSN 2576-2974 E-ISSN 2576-2982 https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v1n1p18 Letter Frequency Analysis of Languages Using Latin Alphabet Gintautas Grigas1 & Anita Juškevičienė1 1 Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University, Lithuania Correspondence: Anita Juškevičienė, Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University, Akademijos str. 4, LT-08663, Vilnius, Lithuania. Tel: 370-5210-9314. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received: February 23, 2018; Accepted: March 8, 2018; Published: March 26, 2018 Abstract The evaluation of the peculiarities of alphabets, particularly the frequency of letters is essential when designing keyboards, analysing texts, designing alphabet-based games, and doing some text mining. Thus, it is important to determine what might be useful for designers of text input tools, and of other technologies related to sets of letters. Knowledge of common features among different languages gives an opportunity to take advantage of the experience of other languages. Nowadays an increasing amount of texts is published on the Internet. In order to adequately compare the frequencies of letters in different languages used in the online space, Wikipedia texts have been selected as a source material for investigation. This paper presents the Method of the Adjacent Letter Frequency Differences in the frequency line, which helps to evaluate frequency breakpoints. This is a uniform evaluation criterion for 25 main languages using Latin script in order to highlight the similarities and differences among them. Research focuses on the letter frequency analysis in the area of rarely used native letters and frequently used foreign letters in a particular language.
    [Show full text]
  • Shift Cipher Substitution Cipher Vigenère Cipher Hill Cipher
    Lecture 2 Classical Cryptosystems Shift cipher Substitution cipher Vigenère cipher Hill cipher 1 Shift Cipher • A Substitution Cipher • The Key Space: – [0 … 25] • Encryption given a key K: – each letter in the plaintext P is replaced with the K’th letter following the corresponding number ( shift right ) • Decryption given K: – shift left • History: K = 3, Caesar’s cipher 2 Shift Cipher • Formally: • Let P=C= K=Z 26 For 0≤K≤25 ek(x) = x+K mod 26 and dk(y) = y-K mod 26 ʚͬ, ͭ ∈ ͔ͦͪ ʛ 3 Shift Cipher: An Example ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • P = CRYPTOGRAPHYISFUN Note that punctuation is often • K = 11 eliminated • C = NCJAVZRCLASJTDQFY • C → 2; 2+11 mod 26 = 13 → N • R → 17; 17+11 mod 26 = 2 → C • … • N → 13; 13+11 mod 26 = 24 → Y 4 Shift Cipher: Cryptanalysis • Can an attacker find K? – YES: exhaustive search, key space is small (<= 26 possible keys). – Once K is found, very easy to decrypt Exercise 1: decrypt the following ciphertext hphtwwxppelextoytrse Exercise 2: decrypt the following ciphertext jbcrclqrwcrvnbjenbwrwn VERY useful MATLAB functions can be found here: http://www2.math.umd.edu/~lcw/MatlabCode/ 5 General Mono-alphabetical Substitution Cipher • The key space: all possible permutations of Σ = {A, B, C, …, Z} • Encryption, given a key (permutation) π: – each letter X in the plaintext P is replaced with π(X) • Decryption, given a key π: – each letter Y in the ciphertext C is replaced with π-1(Y) • Example ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ πBADCZHWYGOQXSVTRNMSKJI PEFU • BECAUSE AZDBJSZ 6 Strength of the General Substitution Cipher • Exhaustive search is now infeasible – key space size is 26! ≈ 4*10 26 • Dominates the art of secret writing throughout the first millennium A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Arabic Keyboard Layout
    Sci.Int.(Lahore),33(1),5-15,2021 ISSN 1013-5316; CODEN: SINTE 8 5 AN IMPROVED ARABIC KEYBOARD LAYOUT 1Amjad Qtaish, 2Jalawi Alshudukhi, 3Badiea Alshaibani, 4Yosef Saleh, 5Salam Bazrawi College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT: One of the most important human–machine interaction (HMI) systems is the computer keyboard. The keyboard layout (KL) dictates how a person interacts with a physical keyboard through the way in which the letters, numbers, punctuation marks, and symbols are mapped and arranged on the keyboard. Mapping letters onto the keys of a keyboard is complex because many issues need to be taken into considerations, such as the nature of the language, finger fatigue, hand balance, typing speed, and distance traveled by fingers during typing and finger movements. There are two main kinds of KL: English and Arabic. Although numerous research studies have proposed different layouts for the English keyboard, there is a lack of research studies that focus on the Arabic KL. To address this lack, this study analyzed and clarified the limitations of the standard legacy Arabic KL. Then an efficient Arabic KL was proposed to overcome the limitations of the current KL. The frequency of Arabic letters and bi-gram probabilities were measured on a large Arabic corpus in order to assess the current KL and to design the improved Arabic KL. The improved Arabic KL was then evaluated and compared against the current KL in terms of letter frequency, finger-travel distance, hand and finger balance, bi-gram frequency, row distribution, and most frequent words.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptology: an Historical Introduction DRAFT
    Cryptology: An Historical Introduction DRAFT Jim Sauerberg February 5, 2013 2 Copyright 2013 All rights reserved Jim Sauerberg Saint Mary's College Contents List of Figures 8 1 Caesar Ciphers 9 1.1 Saint Cyr Slide . 12 1.2 Running Down the Alphabet . 14 1.3 Frequency Analysis . 15 1.4 Linquist's Method . 20 1.5 Summary . 22 1.6 Topics and Techniques . 22 1.7 Exercises . 23 2 Cryptologic Terms 29 3 The Introduction of Numbers 31 3.1 The Remainder Operator . 33 3.2 Modular Arithmetic . 38 3.3 Decimation Ciphers . 40 3.4 Deciphering Decimation Ciphers . 42 3.5 Multiplication vs. Addition . 44 3.6 Koblitz's Kid-RSA and Public Key Codes . 44 3.7 Summary . 48 3.8 Topics and Techniques . 48 3.9 Exercises . 49 4 The Euclidean Algorithm 55 4.1 Linear Ciphers . 55 4.2 GCD's and the Euclidean Algorithm . 56 4.3 Multiplicative Inverses . 59 4.4 Deciphering Decimation and Linear Ciphers . 63 4.5 Breaking Decimation and Linear Ciphers . 65 4.6 Summary . 67 4.7 Topics and Techniques . 67 4.8 Exercises . 68 3 4 CONTENTS 5 Monoalphabetic Ciphers 71 5.1 Keyword Ciphers . 72 5.2 Keyword Mixed Ciphers . 73 5.3 Keyword Transposed Ciphers . 74 5.4 Interrupted Keyword Ciphers . 75 5.5 Frequency Counts and Exhaustion . 76 5.6 Basic Letter Characteristics . 77 5.7 Aristocrats . 78 5.8 Summary . 80 5.9 Topics and Techniques . 81 5.10 Exercises . 81 6 Decrypting Monoalphabetic Ciphers 89 6.1 Letter Interactions . 90 6.2 Decrypting Monoalphabetic Ciphers .
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Screening and Testing Protocol for Keyboard Layout Speed Comparison
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS 1 A Rapid Screening and Testing Protocol for Keyboard Layout Speed Comparison Joonseok Lee, Member, IEEE, Hanggjun Cho, Student Member, IEEE and R I (Bob) McKay*, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—We propose an efficient, low-overhead methodology an analysis based on this protocol, comparing a personalised for screening key layouts for ultimate typing speed. It is fast, mobile phone keypad layout with a well-known “ABC” layout. and complementary to existing protocols in other ways. For We compare the theoretical improvement in efficiency, based equal overhead, it allows testing over a wider range of users. It is subject to potential biases, but they can be quantified and on a model of typing speed, with the experimental results adjusted. It assumes an existing standard layout which is used as obtained from our protocol. We conclude with a discussion a comparator. It eliminates bias from differing familiarity and of the assumptions and limitations of the approach, of the finger memory by appropriately mapping both layouts. ways it may be effectively combined with other techniques, We illustrate it with two mobile phone keypad layouts: Sam- and some possible future extensions. sung’s variant of the common ABC layout, and a new user-specific layout (PM). We repeat a comparison previously undertaken by a training-based method, which used 10 participants, and II. BACKGROUND estimated a 54% speedup for PM (SD=35%). The new method A. Earlier Methodologies used 116 participants and estimated a 19.5% speedup (SD=7.5%). Differences in speedup estimates can be explained by the wide There are obstacles to fair, rapid layout comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Cryptography and Cryptanalysis
    History Of Cryptography And Cryptanalysis Aleksandar Nikoli´c University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technical Sciences Chair of Informatics [email protected] April 11, 2013 Aleksandar Nikoli´c (FTN) History Of Cryptography April 11, 2013 1 / 32 Overview 1 Introduction 2 History 3 Cryptool 4 Ciphers - making and breaking Caesar’s cipher Simple substitution Vigen`ere Cipher One time pad Enigma machine 5 Conclusion Aleksandar Nikoli´c (FTN) History Of Cryptography April 11, 2013 2 / 32 Introduction What is cryptography? Cryptography is the (very) delicate science of keeping secrets secret. In the old days, cryptography’s sole purpose was to ensure secret communication between two parties. This was achieved by enciphering the message thus rendering it unintelligible to anyone but those who know the secret code. Today, cryptography is used virtually everywhere for all sorts of different purposes: authentication, digital signatures, digital currency, secure computation. Few historical ciphers shall be reviewed and their flaws exposed. Aleksandar Nikoli´c (FTN) History Of Cryptography April 11, 2013 3 / 32 Introduction Terminology Cryptography The science of keeping secrets secret. Cryptanalysis The art and science of breaking and deciphering secret codes. Cryptology Science, branch of mathematics, that includes both of the above. Aleksandar Nikoli´c (FTN) History Of Cryptography April 11, 2013 4 / 32 Introduction Terminology Plaintext Non-enciphered, readable message. Ciphertext Enciphered message, appears to be nonsensical. Encryption Process of turning plaintext into ciphertext. Decryption Reverse. Turning ciphertext into plaintext. Aleksandar Nikoli´c (FTN) History Of Cryptography April 11, 2013 5 / 32 Introduction Usual characters Explaining cryptographic schemes and protocols can sometimes be tricky.
    [Show full text]
  • Engram: a Systematic Approach to Optimize Keyboard Layouts for Touch Typing, with Example for the English Language
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 March 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202103.0287.v1 Engram: a systematic approach to optimize keyboard layouts for touch typing, with example for the English language 1 Arno Klein ,​ PhD ​ 1 MATTER​ Lab, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, United States Corresponding Author: Arno Klein, PhD MATTER Lab Child Mind Institute 101 E 56th St NY, NY 10022 United States Phone: 1-347-577-2091 Email: [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0707-2889 Abstract Most computer keyboard layouts (mappings of characters to keys) do not reflect the ergonomics of the human hand, resulting in preventable repetitive strain injuries. We present a set of ergonomics principles relevant to touch typing, introduce a scoring model that encodes these principles, and outline a systematic approach for developing optimized keyboard layouts in any language based on this scoring model coupled with character-pair frequencies. We then create a keyboard layout optimized for touch typing in English by constraining key assignments to reduce lateral finger movements and enforce easy access to high-frequency letters and letter pairs, applying open source software to generate millions of layouts, and evaluating them based on Google’s N-gram data. We use two independent scoring methods to compare the resulting Engram layout against 10 other prominent keyboard layouts based on a variety of publicly available text sources. The Engram layout scores consistently higher than other keyboard layouts. Keywords keyboard layout, optimized keyboard layout, keyboard, touch typing, bigram frequencies Practitioner summary Most keyboard layouts (character mappings) have questionable ergonomics foundations, resulting in preventable repetitive strain injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Computer Security Lecture 35: Entropy of English
    Foundations of Computer Security Lecture 35: Entropy of English Dr. Bill Young Department of Computer Sciences University of Texas at Austin Lecture 35: 1 Entropy of English Entropy vs. Redundancy Intuitively, the difference between the efficiency of the encoding and the entropy is a measure of the redundancy in the encoding. If you find an encoding with efficiency matching the entropy and there is no redundancy. The standard encoding for English contains a lot of redundancy. Fr xmpl, y cn prbbly gss wht ths sntnc sys, vn wth ll f th vwls mssng. Tht ndcts tht th nfrmtn cntnt cn b xtrctd frm th rmnng smbls. Lecture 35: 2 Entropy of English The Effect of Redundancy The following also illustrates the redundancy of English text: Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabirgde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a ttoal mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Spammers count on the ability of humans to decipher such text, and the inability of computers to do so to defeat anti-spam filters: Care to order some Vi@gra or Vigara? Lecture 35: 3 Entropy of English Entropy of English: Zero-Order Model Suppose we want to transmit English text (26 letters and a space). If we assume that all characters are equally likely, the entropy is: h = −(log 1/27) = 4.75 This is the zero-order model of English.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptography
    Cryptography 1 Acknowledgment • Based on slides by prof. Cristina Nita-Rotaru 2 Shift Cipher • A substitution cipher • The Key Space: – [1 .. 25] • Encryption given a key K: – each letter in the plaintext P is replaced with the K’th letter following corresponding number (shift right) • Decryption given K: – shift left History: K = 3, Caesar’s cipher 3 Shift Cipher: An Example A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 P = CRYPTOGRAPHYISFUN K = 11 C = NCJAVZRCLASJTDQFY C 2; 2+11 mod 26 = 13 N R 17; 17+11 mod 26 = 2 C … N 13; 13+11 mod 26 = 24 Y 4 Shift Cipher: Cryptanalysis • Can an attacker find K? – YES: exhaustive search, key space is small (<= 26 possible keys). • Once K is found, very easy to decrypt 5 General Mono-alphabetical Substitution Cipher • The key space: all permutations of = {A, B, C, …, Z} • Encryption given a key (permutation) : – each letter X in the plaintext P is replaced with (X) • Decryption given a key : – each letter Y in the cipherext P is replaced with -1(Y) Example: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z = B A D C Z H W Y G O Q X S V T R N M S K J I P F E U BECAUSE AZDBJSZ 6 Strength of the General Substitution Cipher • Exhaustive search is infeasible – key space size is 26! 4*1026 • Dominates the art of secret writing throughout the first millennium A.D.
    [Show full text]