DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ecology of Invertebrate Drift and Feeding Chronology of the

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1979 The cologE y of Invertebrate Drift nda Feeding Chronology of the Striped Shiner, Notropis chrysocephalus (Rafinesque) in Polecat Creek, Illinois Dennis L. Newman Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Zoology at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Newman, Dennis L., "The cE ology of Invertebrate Drift nda Feeding Chronology of the Striped Shiner, Notropis chrysocephalus (Rafinesque) in Polecat Creek, Illinois" (1979). Masters Theses. 3186. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/3186 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce theses. The University Library is receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or un iversity for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings. Date Author I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis be reproduced because -�� Date Author m The Ecology of Invertebrate Drift and Feeding Chronology of the - Striped Shiner, Notropis chrysocephalus (Rafinesque) in Polecat Creek, Illinois (TITLE) BY Dennis L. Newman ... _ THESIS SUBMITIED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Zoology IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1979 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE JS- 151'1 ADVISER IS��4 DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD The Undersigned , Appointed by the Ch airman of the Department of Zoology, Have Examined A Thesis Entitled The Ecology of Invertebrate Drift and Feeding Chronology of the Striped Shiner, Notropis chrysocephalus (Rafinesque) in Polecat Creek, Illinois Presented by Dennis L. Newman A Candidate for the Degree of Master of Science And Hereby Certify That, In Their Opinion, It Is Acceptable ABS TRACT The downstrea m drift of macroinvertebrates and the daily feed ing cycle of the striped shiner, Notropis chrysocephalus (Rafinesque), were studied during the spring and summer of 1978 in Polecat Creek, Illinois. The purpose of the study was to: investigate the drift phenomenon of an entire lotic community, determine the pattern of diel periodicity for several impor tant benthic populations, make qualitative and quantita­ tive assessments of the relation of drift to benthos, and examine drift in relation to the daily feeding ecology of a cyprinid carnivore. Polecat Cr eek at the sampling site was a relatively fast-flowing third-order stream, with frequent riffles. Drift sampling was conducted at the downstream end of a single riffle ov er four 24-hour periods; April 28-29, May 19-20, August 10-11, and September 1-2. Current velocity was measured at the mouth of the net and the number or weight of aquatic invertebrates collected was standardized according to volume of water, defined as drift density. Th e standing crop of invertebrates in the riffle benthos was estimated from four s�rber foot square samples taken in the riffle area upstream of the rjr if t net after drift sampling was concluded. Fish were collected , by seining, at six-hour intervals on May 19-20 and four-hour intervals on August 10-11. The fish were measured and weighed, stomach contents were removed from the digestive tract beginning at the esophagus and extending to the first 180 degree turn, the contents were identified, counted and wet weighed. Invertebrates other than insects comprised only 0.3 per cent of the total numbers of aquatic drift. Ch ironomidae larvae and pupae dominated drift collections in April and May. The mayflies, Baetis and Caenis, the adult elmid, Dubiraphia vittata and the caddisfly, Cheu matopsyche, were the predominant taxa in the August and September drift samples. Several insects collected during this study had not previously been reported as part of the drift or as drifting within a pattern of diel periodicity in warm water streams these included: Isonychia, Pseudocloeon dubium, Stenacron interpunctatum, Dubiraphia vittata, Macronychus glabratus , Stenelmis crenata, and Simulium. Benthic samples contained fewer taxa than drift samples and some invertebrates which were common in the drift were not present in bottom samples. Terrestrial invertebrates conSributed nearly one-third of the drifting biomass over the �n tire study period and adult chironomids were the predominant taxonomic group. Adults from aquatic immature stages (Chironomidae,Hydropsychidae, Ephemeroptera) drifted within a pattern of diel periodicity, ho wever adults from terrestria l origins exhibited no consistent patterns of drift. Peaks in feeding activity of the striped shiner occurred prior to sunset and after sunrise, therefore, it was not feeding most actively when drift densities were highest. Chironomid larvae were the principal food item of the striped shiner, even though other aquatic insects were co nnnon in the drift. Diurnal drift densities of chironomid larvae were higher than other prey or ganisms and therefore they were more availab le as a food item when fish were feeding most active ly. I TABLE OF CONTENTS page INTRODUCTI ON 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 THE STUDY AREA 22 METHODS AND MATERIALS 25 RESULTS 28 Compo sition of the Aquatic Drift 28 Diel Patterns of the Total Invertebrate Drift 41 Diel Drift Patterns of Individual Taxa 46 Relation of Drift to Benthos 51 Larval Fish 62 Terrestrial Drift 62 The Daily Feeding Cycle of Notropis chrysocephalus 69 Food Compo sition During the 24-hour Period 73 DISCUSSION 81 LITERATURE CITED 90 II LIST OF TAB LES page Table 1. List of taxa, number s of individuals and per cent 30 of total drift for collections of organisms from Polecat Cr eek, Illinois on April 28-29, 1978. Table 2. List of taxa, numbers of individuals and per cent of 32 total drift for collections of organisms from Polecat Creek, Illinois on May 19-20, 1978. Table 3. List of taxa, numbers of individuals and per cent 35 of total drift for collections of organisms from Polecat Creek, Illinois on August 10-1 1, 1978. Table 4. List of taxa, number s of individuals and per cent 38 of total drift for collections of organisms from Polecat Creek, Illinois.pn September 1-2 , 1978. Table 5. Compari son of m�an weight per individual (mg wet 61 weight) in drift and benthos sa mples in Polecat Creek. Table 6. Percent compo sition of common taxa in the terres­ 64 trial drift during the four collection dates in Polecat Creek. Table 7. Size and diel change s in per cent fullness of the 74 striped shiner, Notropi s chrysoc ephalus in Polecat Creek. Table 8. Food composition of Notropis chrysocephalus in 75 Polecat Creek expre ssed as per cent by weight over the 24-hour period, May 19-20, 1978. Table 9. Proportion of . the benthos in the drift in Polecat 85 Creek, Illinois and Lusk Creek, Alberta (Radford and Harland-Rowe 1971. III LIST OF FIGURES page Figure 1. Diel pattern of total drift in Polecat Creek during 42 April 28-29 based on numbers and weight. Figure 2. Diel pattern of total drift in Polecat Creek during 43 May 19-20 based on numbers and weight. Figure 3. Diel pattern of total drift in Polecat Creek during 44 August 10-11 based on numbers and weight. Figure 4. Diel pattern of total drift in Polecat Creek during 45 September 1-2 based on numbers and weight. Figure 5. Diel pattern of Orthocladiinae and Chironominae in 47 Polecat Creek during April 28-29, Ma y 19-20, and September 1-2 , 1978. , Figure 6. Diel drift of Chironomidae pupae in Polecat Creek 49 during April 28�29, Ma y 19-20, and September 1-2, 1978. Figure 7. Diel drift of Simulium larvae in Polecat Creek during 50 April 28-29 , May 19-20, September 1-2, 1978. Figure 8. Diel drift of Dubiraph ia vittata and Ma cronychus 52 gl abratus adults in Polecat Creek during May 19-20, August 10-11, and September 1-2 , 1978. Figure 9. Diel drift of Cheumatopsyc he larvae in Polecat Creek 53 during August 10-11 and September 1-2, 1978. Figure 10. Diel drift of Baetis nymphs in Polecat Creek during 54 May 19-20, August 10-11, and September 1-2, 1978. Figure 11. Diel drift of Caenis nymphs in Polecat Creek during 55 May 19-20, August 10-11, and September 1-2, 1978. Figure 12. Diel drift of Pseudocloeon dubium nymphs in Polecat 56 Creek during April 28-29 and May 19-20, 1978 . Figure 13. Diel drift of Stenacron interpun ctatum nymphs in 57 Polecat Creek during August 10-11 and September 1-2,1978. Figure 14. Diel drift of Isonychia nymphs in Polecat Creek during 58 September 1-2, 1978. Figure 15. Relative abundance of taxa occurring in both the 59 benthos and drift in Polecat Creek. Figure 16. Diel drift and density of larval fish from Polecat 63 Creek during April 28-29 and May 19-20, 1978 . IV page Figure 17. Diel drift of Chironomidae adults in Polecat Creek 66 during April 28-29 , May 19-20, August 10-11 and September 1-2, 1978.
Recommended publications

  • Carmine Shiner (Notropis Percobromus) in Canada

    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Carmine Shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada THREATENED 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 29 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports COSEWIC 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus and rosyface shiner Notropis rubellus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. v + 17 pp. Houston, J. 1994. COSEWIC status report on the rosyface shiner Notropis rubellus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-17 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the update status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Robert Campbell, Co-chair, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Species Specialist Subcommittee. In 1994 and again in 2001, COSEWIC assessed minnows belonging to the rosyface shiner species complex, including those in Manitoba, as rosyface shiner (Notropis rubellus). For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la tête carminée (Notropis percobromus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
  • Table of Contents 2

    Table of Contents 2

    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
  • Ecology of Rearing Fish. Using the Data Collected This Field Season As Baseline Information, Should Include the Following Objectives

    Ecology of Rearing Fish. Using the Data Collected This Field Season As Baseline Information, Should Include the Following Objectives

    Volume 14 Study D-1 STATE OF ALASKA William A. Egan. Governor Annual Progress Report for A Study of Land Use Activities and their Relationship to the Sport Fish Resources in Alaska by Steven T. Elliott and Richard Reed ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME James W. Brooks. Commissioner DIVISION OF SPORT FISH Rupert E. Andrews. Director Howard E. Metsker. Coordinator ',\:;~J.Llde8 the first full year of field activities to be conducted under H",,; Study (D-1). This report does not, however, present the initial 1M hjch has been collected on the effects of logging on fish habitat. dIn;, tll'ell tn.to logging effects on rearing fish habitat was started under lr' D, Iiarden Study (R-IV). In 1970, it was decided that research was '88a1y in determine what effects logging operations have on the stream 'e.'::ne'o by the Dolly Varden, Salvelinus malma, during their freshwater g stl.lges As a result, a separate job entitled, Effects of Logging on :L~~l'd~'~. (R-IV-B) , was initiated under the Dolly Varden study. INI, ",Hit'S of research, the major emphasis no longer rested solely with VHj,jel'! j but had expanded to include all rearing salmonids. In addition, waf::- feU ,hat a broader scope of study, covering all phases of land use activities, ":It thill, solely logging operations, was necessary. Consequently, it was llk;ll'.:l~~d ~hat the effects of logging research be removed from the Dolly ,', and a new overall Land Use Study be established. The following i: the initial activities conducted under this new study.
  • Biobasics Contents

    Biobasics Contents

    Illinois Biodiversity Basics a biodiversity education program of Illinois Department of Natural Resources Chicago Wilderness World Wildlife Fund Adapted from Biodiversity Basics, © 1999, a publication of World Wildlife Fund’s Windows on the Wild biodiversity education program. For more information see <www.worldwildlife.org/windows>. Table of Contents About Illinois Biodiversity Basics ................................................................................................................. 2 Biodiversity Background ............................................................................................................................... 4 Biodiversity of Illinois CD-ROM series ........................................................................................................ 6 Activities Section 1: What is Biodiversity? ...................................................................................................... 7 Activity 1-1: What’s Your Biodiversity IQ?.................................................................... 8 Activity 1-2: Sizing Up Species .................................................................................... 19 Activity 1-3: Backyard BioBlitz.................................................................................... 31 Activity 1-4: The Gene Scene ....................................................................................... 43 Section 2: Why is Biodiversity Important? .................................................................................... 61 Activity
  • Silver Shiner (Notropis Photogenis) (Natureserve 2008)

    Silver Shiner (Notropis Photogenis) (Natureserve 2008)

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis in Canada THREATENED 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 45 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): Parker, B. and McKJee, P. 1983. COSEWIC status report on the Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-13 pp. Baldwin, M.E. 1987. COSEWIC updated status report on the Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Erling Holm for writing the provisional status report on the Silver Shiner, Notropis photogenis, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim and 2-month interim status reports were overseen by Dr. Eric Taylor, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair, and Scott Reid, SSC member. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le méné miroir (Notropis photogenis) au Canada.
  • Abstract Poteat, Monica Deshay

    Abstract Poteat, Monica Deshay

    ABSTRACT POTEAT, MONICA DESHAY. Comparative Trace Metal Physiology in Aquatic Insects. (Under the direction of Dr. David B. Buchwalter). Despite their dominance in freshwater systems and use in biomonitoring and bioassessment programs worldwide, little is known about the ion/metal physiology of aquatic insects. Even less is known about the variability of trace metal physiologies across aquatic insect species. Here, we measured dissolved metal bioaccumulation dynamics using radiotracers in order to 1) gain an understanding of the uptake and interactions of Ca, Cd and Zn at the apical surface of aquatic insects and 2) comparatively analyze metal bioaccumulation dynamics in closely-related aquatic insect species. Dissolved metal uptake and efflux rate constants were calculated for 19 species. We utilized species from families Hydropsychidae (order Trichoptera) and Ephemerellidae (order Ephemeroptera) because they are particularly species-rich and because they are differentially sensitive to metals in the field – Hydropsychidae are relatively tolerant and Ephemerellidae are relatively sensitive. In uptake experiments with Hydropsyche sparna (Hydropsychidae), we found evidence of two shared transport systems for Cd and Zn – a low capacity-high affinity transporter below 0.8 µM, and a second high capacity-low affinity transporter operating at higher concentrations. Cd outcompeted Zn at concentrations above 0.6 µM, suggesting a higher affinity of Cd for a shared transporter at those concentrations. While Cd and Zn uptake strongly co-varied across 12 species (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001), neither Cd nor Zn uptake significantly co-varied with Ca uptake in these species. Further, Ca only modestly inhibited Cd and Zn uptake, while neither Cd nor Zn inhibited Ca uptake at concentrations up to concentrations of 89 nM Cd and 1.53 µM Zn.
  • Chapter 1 Introduction to Maryland's State Wildlife Action Plan

    Chapter 1 Introduction to Maryland's State Wildlife Action Plan

    Chapter 1 Introduction to Maryland’s State Wildlife Action Plan APPENDICES 2015-2025 Maryland State Wildlife Action Plan Chapter 1 Appendices 1a. Species of Greatest Conservation Need by Common Name 1b. Species of Greatest Conservation Need by Scientific Name 2015-2025 Maryland State Wildlife Action Plan Appendix 1a. List of Species of Greatest Conservation Need by Common Name Contents Maryland SGCN Mammals ......................................................................................................... 2 Maryland SGCN Birds ................................................................................................................. 3 Maryland SGCN Reptiles............................................................................................................. 8 Maryland SGCN Amphibians ..................................................................................................... 9 Maryland SGCN Fishes .............................................................................................................. 10 Maryland SGCN Insects ............................................................................................................ 11 Beetles ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Bees, Wasps and Ants ............................................................................................................... 12 Butterflies and Moths ...............................................................................................................
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
  • 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies

    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies

    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Patrick Center for Environmental Research 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Report No. 10-04F Submitted to: Eastman Chemical Company Tennessee Operations Submitted by: Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 April 20, 2012 Executive Summary he 2010 study was the seventh in a series of comprehensive studies of aquatic biota and Twater chemistry conducted by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in the vicinity of Kingsport, TN. Previous studies were conducted in 1965, 1967 (cursory study, primarily focusing on al- gae), 1974, 1977, 1980, 1990 and 1997. Elements of the 2010 study included analysis of land cover, basic environmental water chemistry, attached algae and aquatic macrophytes, aquatic insects, non-insect macroinvertebrates, and fish. For each study element, field samples were collected and analyzed from Scientists from the Academy's Patrick Center for Environmental Research zones located on the South Fork Holston River have conducted seven major environmental monitoring studies on the (Zones 2, 3 and 5), Big Sluice (Zone 4), mainstem South Fork Holston River since 1965. Holston River (Zone 6), and Horse Creek (Zones HC1and HC2), the approximate locations of which are shown below. The design of the 2010 study was very similar to that of previous surveys, allowing comparisons among surveys. In addition, two areas of potential local impacts were assessed for the first time: Big Tree Spring (BTS, located on the South Fork within Zone 2) and Kit Bottom (KU and KL in the Big Sluice, upstream of Zone 4).