DOCSLIB.ORG

Icelandic Agricultural Statistics 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Icelandic Agricultural Statistics 2009 Icelandic Agricultural Statistics 2009 THE FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF ICELAND HAGATORG 1 | 107 REYKJAVÍK PHONE +354 563 0300 | FAX +354 562 3058 email: [email protected] | website: www.bondi.is Contents 1. The Land and the Farmer – pages 1-5 7. Farm Operation – pages 22-23 2. Livestock and Farms – pages 6-8 8. Exports – page 24 3. Production – pages 9-12 9. Economic Statistics – pages 25-26 4. The Marketplace – pages 13-17 10. International Comparison – pages 27-28 5. Prices and Price Indexes – pages 18-20 Useful Contacts – page 28 6. Support Targets – page 21 Geographical division of Iceland In this booklet the regional division of Iceland used by the Statistics Iceland is followed. There are seven regions: The Capital region The Southwest The West The Westfjords The Northwest The Northeast The East The South Source: Statistics Iceland. Currency The value of the Icelandic crown (ISK) on January 1st 2009: Pound Sterling 1 GBP = 175.43 ISK Euro 1 EUR = 169.97 ISK US Dollar 1 USD = 120.87 ISK Danish crown 1 DKK = 22.81 ISK The Land and the Farmer – 1 Population as of December 1st 1901 1940 1960 1990 2000 2009* Urban 17,732 81,246 144,660 232,054 261,104 298,528 Rural** 60,738 40,228 31,020 23,654 21,745 20,840 Total 78,470 121,474 175,680 255,708 282,249 319,368 % Rural 77.4% 33.1% 17.7% 9.3% 7.7% 6.5% *January 1st 2009. **Rural <200 inhabitants Source: Statistics Iceland. The urbanization of Iceland 1901-2009 100 Rural < 200 inhabitants 80 60 40 20 Urban 0 1901 1940 1960 1990 2000 2009 Source: Statistics Iceland. Proportional distribution of national income by industry 1990-2007 (%) 1990 1995 1997 2003 20071) Agriculture 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.4 Fisheries 9.6 9.5 8.4 6.3 4.6 Industry 16.3 16.1 16.9 12.5 10.8 Power works 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.3 4.3 Construction 8.4 7.1 8.4 7.5 10.4 Trade, hotels, catering 13.7 14.0 13.4 11.9 11.6 Transportation 8.0 8.4 8.8 7.7 5.7 Financial and other services 17.7 17.1 16.1 23.0 28.1 Government 19.6 21.5 22.0 26.1 23.0 1) Estimated. Source: Statistics Iceland. 1 The surface of Iceland Total area 103,022 km2 Birch forest and shrubs 1,165 km2 2 Lakes 1,747 km Rivers 606 km2 Wetlands 8,711 km2 Moss 10,326 km2 Uncultivated and barren land 42,476 km2 Icecaps 11,179 km2 Heaths, grass and cultivated land 27,009 km2 Total area Land utilization Km2 Proportion – by elevation above sea level of total area 0-200 m 24,708 km2 24.0% Arable below 200 m 201-400 m 18,401 km2 17.9% 401-600 m 22,168 km2 21.5% above sea level 15,500 15.0% above 600 m 37,745 km2 36.6% Lava 11,000 10.7% Within fences (1,074 km) 3,021 2.9% Cultivated land 1,290 1.3% Grass fields 1,220 1.2% Forests 1,360 1.3% 68 areas protected by The State Forest Service 360 0.3% Horticulture, fodder and grain fields 70 0.1% Source: National Land Survey, Statistics Iceland, The State Soil Conservation Service, The State Forest Service, Farmers Association of Iceland. 2 Icelandic farms and farmers Number of farms 3,045 Number of livestock owners 3,247 Average age of farmers, 2006 52 years Proportion of manpower in agriculture, 2006 3.8% Producer support estimate (PSE), 2008 51% Typical family farm size: Dairy farm 35 cows Sheep farm 300-500 winterfed sheep Source: Farmers Association of Iceland. Average farm size and farmers’ working hours on a model farming unit for price reference Livestock Sheep units Working hours per year Dairy farm 40 dairy cows and other cattle 1,080 4,799 hours Sheep farm 400 winter-fed sheep 419 2,428 hours Source: Farmers Association of Iceland. Number of farms and farm production in Europe, 2008 Number of Number of Cultivated Inhabitants, farms, farms per land, ha per million 1,000 1,000 inhab. 1,000 inhab. Iceland 0.3 3 10 449 Belgium and Luxembourg 10.6 54 5 142 Denmark 5.4 48 9 504 Finland 5.3 71 14 426 Sweden 9.1 76 8 347 Ireland 4.3 133 31 1,170 United Kingdom 60.8 287 5 271 Netherlands 16.4 82 5 124 Germany 82.3 390 5 209 France 63.4 567 9 505 Spain 44.5 1,079 24 732 Portugal 10.6 324 31 391 Italy 59.1 1.729 29 267 Austria 8.3 171 21 421 Greece 11.2 834 74 484 Source: Danish Agricultural Statistics, 2008; The Farmers Association of Iceland, 2008. 3 Ownership and number of operational farms, 2006 Municipalities 112 302 State 452 owned Others 3394 Farmers and associates Source: Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture. Feed and fodder 1970-2006 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007 Grass pellets, tonnes 1,335 12,858 5,200 3,300 600 Dry hay, 1000 m3 2,060 3,704 2,515 1,263 433 206 144 Silage hay, 1000 m3 141 174 744 1,207 1,958 1,762 1,849 Grain (barley), tons 885 485 4,337 9,773 11,246 The total size of cultivated grass fields is estimated 1,220 km2 and other cultivated fields (vegetable and potato gardens, fodder and grain fields) 70 km2 which totals 1,290 km2. Arable land below 200 m above sea level is estimated 15,500 km2 which means that 7.9% of arable land is used for grass cultivation and 0.5% for other crops which totals 8.4%. Source: Farmers Association of Iceland, grass pellet producers, Agricultural Research Institute. 4 Grain cultivation 1991-2007 Year Crop yield from trials, Grain fields as usage Total grain crop, grain, tons/hectare of seed, hectares tons, estimated 1991 3.5 200 525 1992 1.2 400 240 1993 2.2 400 440 1994 3.4 600 1,700 1995 2.4 500 960 1996 3.7 900 2,960 1997 3.8 1,500 4,560 1998 3.9 1,800 4,680 1999 3.3 1,800 4,620 2000 4.2 2,000 6,300 2001 4.5 2,100 7,650 2002 4.1 2,400 7,585 2003 5.5 2,600 11,000 2004 5.3 2,330 10,255 2005 3.6-6.2 3,636 9,773 2006 2.8-7.9 3,588 11,253 2007 11,246 Estimated total crops based on usage of seed in on one hand and, on the other, on crops from trials. The outcome is probably a little too high, but it shows that homegrown grain represents approximately 10-12% of the grain used as fodder in Iceland. 45% of the grain cultivation is in the southern part of Iceland, 35% in the north, 15% in the western part and 5% in the east of Iceland. Artificial fertilizer (tons) 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2003 2007 Nitrogen (N) 14,900 12,931 12,163 12,100 12,382 10,344 13,832 Phosphorus (P2O5) 8,127 6,991 5,997 5,240 5,471 3,394 5,982 Potash (K2O) 6,184 5,295 4,575 3,960 4,013 2,114 4,457 Total 29,211 25,217 22,735 21,300 21,866 15,852 24,271 The quantity is shown in terms of pure fertilizer substances. Common usage of fertilizer for cultivated grassland is 100-140 kg/ha of Nitrogen (N), 15-30 kg/ha of Phosphorus (P2O5) and 40-60 kg/ha of Potassium (K2O). Source: Statistics Iceland. Organic production – Number of producers and processing plants* 1.1.1998 1.1.2000 1.1.2001 1.1.2002 1.1.2003 1.1.2009 Producers 22 27 27 30 30 36 Processing plants 7 9 9 11 11 14 * Units certified by TÚN Certification Body for production and/or processing of organic products. Production quantity not available. Source: Farmers Association of Iceland; TÚN Certification Body. 5 2 – Livestock and Farms Number of livestock By region 2008 Cattle Dairy Calves and Sheep Horses Goats Total Cows heifers Total Ewes total total Capital region 1,470 473 841 4,395 3,421 9,273 14 West 8,835 3,442 5,214 76,977 60,791 9,721 179 Westfjords 2,385 884 1,474 47,620 37,787 930 Northwest 10,343 3,620 6,384 101,549 79,974 19,087 91 Northeast 16,313 6,322 9,754 71,980 56,674 7,122 88 East 3,904 1,367 2,494 74,387 58,286 2,933 44 South 25,420 9,396 15,560 78,848 61,598 26,578 33 Total 68,670 25,504 41,721 455,656 358,531 75,644 449 Laying Pigs hens Mink Fox Capital region 1,835 120,281 3,102 2 West 644 421 Westfjords 147 Northwest 3,614 15,785 3 Northeast 585 13,303 3,870 2 East 12 6,500 4,940 105 Source: Farmers South 1,142 37,591 14,260 4 Association of Iceland. Total 4,218 181,857 41,957 116 Cattle 2,385 Sheep 47,620 Cattle 16,313 Cattle 10,343 Sheep 71,980 Sheep 101,549 Cattle 8,835 Cattle 3,904 Sheep 76,977 Sheep 74,387 Cattle 1,470 Sheep 4,395 Cattle 25,420 Sheep 78,848 6 Number of livestock By year 1970-2008 Cattle Dairy Sheep Horses Pigs Total Cows Total Ewes total total 1970 53,294 34,275 735,543 33,472 667 1980 59,933 33,577 827,927 684,589 52,346 1,552 1990 74,889 32,246 548,508 445,513 71,693 3,116 2000 72,135 27,066 465,574 373.194 73,669 3,862 2005 65,979 24,538 454,950 360,375 74,820 3,982 2007 70,660 26,048 454,812 358,177 76,982 4,147 2008 68,670 25,504 455,656 358,531 75,644 4,218 Goats Laying Mink Fox total hens, total total total 1970 135,219 1980 220 310,724 8,080 280 1990 345 214,936 42,000 4,800 2000 193,097 36,593 4,132 2005 166,119 35,935 774 2007 524 184,244 41,497 93 2008 449 181,857 41,957 116 Source: Farmers Association of Iceland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Keeping and Milking of Sheep in the Old Subsistence Economy of Scandinavia, Iceland and Northern Europe
    THE KEEPING AND MILKING OF SHEEP IN THE OLD SUBSISTENCE ECONOMY OF SCANDINAVIA, ICELAND AND NORTHERN EUROPE Jon Bergsftker SHEEP IN EARLY SOCIETIES Archaeologists believe that sheep are associated with the pioneer cultivators in Northern European hunting cultures, and·that as domestic animals they may be considered part of the Northern European farm from earliest times (Brondsted 195 7. I. 262). At Neolithic dwelling sites in Western Norway, sheep bones are identified with refuse from meals (Hagen 1962. 35; Myhre 1967. 33-34), whilst the use of wool for clothes is confirmed from Bronze Age finds in Scandinavia (Brondsted 1958. II. 119-120). There is also reason to believe that the milk-giving qualities of domestic animals have been known from early times. Perforated pottery vessels from both Bronze Age and Iron Age Scandinavia are thought to have been used in the production of cheese (Rank 1966. 44-47). But there is no real evidence to suggest a development from general sheep­ keeping to selective sheep-breeding in prehistoric times in Northern Europe - whether for wool or for meat. The prehistoric sheep - descendants of which, in historic times, were found in e.g. Iceland and the Farnes, in the Norwegian spael.sau or short-tailed sheep, and in the Swedish tantras (country breed)-were kept equally for their milk, wool and mutton. Non-specialised use of the sheep belongs primarily to a subsistence economy where sheep-keeping is based on an individual's personal needs rather than on a concept of produce for sale. Only gradually, as a community becomes more stratified and sections of the population find themselves without sheep, does a more deliberate policy of sheep-keeping appear, linked to commerical and economic factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter - Fall 2017, Volume 22, Issue 2
    Newsletter - Fall 2017, Volume 22, Issue 2 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Calendar 4 News in Brief 6 Color & Pattern Coding 7 Q & A Sheep Production 8 From the Archives 11 Sheepskin Tanning 12 Fiber Artists in Iceland 16 Washing Fleece 24 26 27 28 1 Icelandic Sheep Breeders of North America - Fall 2017, Volume 22, Issue 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROGRAM COORDINATORS President: Webmaster: Elaine Clark 207-793-4640 Marjorie Jackson 573-294-7088 [email protected] [email protected] Vice-President: Librarian: Kathy Taft Boyden 802-244-5679 Connie Millard 573-294-7088 [email protected] [email protected] Secretary: E-list Moderator: Melissa Erlund 318-820-6643 Sondra Gibson 406-777-2334 [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer: Advertising Representative Marge Jackson Kathy Taft Boyden 802-244-5679 [email protected] [email protected] Members at Large: Historian: Terri Carlson 815-288-5886 Vanessa Riva 802-434-3953 [email protected] [email protected] Margaret Flowers 315-246-1178 Breed Promotion [email protected] Elaine Clark 207-793-4640 [email protected] Cassie Petrocelli 207-740-5110 [email protected] Membership Secretary: Rosemary Brown [email protected] NEWSLETTER Editor: Laura Walsh 517-513-1520 [email protected] Assistant Editor: Claire Moxon-Waltz [email protected] Layout Editor: Terri Carlson 815-288-5886 [email protected] Publisher: Natasha Paris 920-767-1108 [email protected] Cover photo: Submitted by Kathy Taft Boyden of Kind Horn Farm Kind Horn Farm is a certified organic farm located in the mountains of Central Vermont. They are in their 11th Interested in attending the board meetings as a read-only breeding season using traditional and AI to breed top-quality member? ISBONA members in good standing are welcome to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • COURSE NOTES V0
    Sheep in the Land of Fire and Ice Sauðfé í landi elds og ísa COURSE NOTES v0 Sheep in the land of Fire and Ice COURSE NOTES v0 Contents PART 1. COURSE INTRODUCTION SECTION 1.1 SHEEP IN THE LAND OF FIRE AND ICE About this course Meet the experts Navigating the course PART 2. SHEEP GRAZING IN THE NORTH SECTION 2.1 SHEEP GRAZING IN THE NORTH Grazing in Nordic regions Studying herbivory in the North – the need for coordinated research efforts SECTION 2.2 SHEEP GRAZING IN ICELAND Environmental conditions in Iceland How do these conditions influence the impacts of grazing? SECTION 2.3 SHEEP GRAZING CAN LEAD TO SOIL EROSION PART 3. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF SHEEP GRAZING IN ICELAND SECTION 3.1 ICELAND BEFORE SHEEP What Iceland could have looked like before human settlement SECTION 3.2 MODELLING THE ECOSYSTEM State and transition models SECTION 3.3 THEN, SHEEP ARRIVED Sheep over time: from landnám to our days SECTION 3.4 EFFORTS TO MITIGATE ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION PART 4. THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE OF SHEEP GRAZING IN ICELAND SECTION 4.1 SHEEP IN ICELAND TODAY Current grazing systems in Iceland SECTION 4.2 CURRENT EFFORTS IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH Grazing research SECTION 4.3 SUSTAINABLE SHEEP GRAZING? The future of sheep grazing PART 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS SECTION 5.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS USEFUL LINKS REFERENCES 2 Sheep in the land of Fire and Ice COURSE NOTES v0 Part 1. Course introduction Section 1.1 Sheep in the Land of Fire and Ice About this course Sheep in the Land of Fire and Ice is a short Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) about sheep grazing in Iceland.
    [Show full text]
  • Would You Like to Receive a 2020 Catalog?
    Would you like to receive a 2020 catalog? There will be a $5 shipping fee to cover the cost of postage on all mailed catalogs. Return this card along with a check for $5 made payable to Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival to PO Box 99, Glenwood, MD 21738, or order a catalog online at www.sheepandwool.org. There will be a $25 charge on any check returned for any reason. Please send me a 2020 Festival Catalog Please Print Clearly Name Address City State Zip Phone # or email Check if this is a change of address. I have enclosed a check for $5 per catalog to cover shipping. Number of catalogs ordered _____. I have enclosed a donation of $_____. Total enclosed $ __________. The Forty-Sixth Annual May 4 & 5, 2019 Howard County Fairgrounds Sponsored by The Maryland Sheep Breeders Association Cover art by Bart Walter Artist information on page 40 Cover design by Ashton Design The Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival is presented by the Maryland Sheep Breeders Association, Inc., a not for profit organization. The Festival’s purpose is to educate the public about sheep and wool. The Festival is organized and conducted by volunteers from the sheep breeding and fiber arts communities. Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival PO Box 99, Glenwood, MD 21738 410-531-3647 www.sheepandwool.org Festival Location: Howard County Fairgrounds 2210 Fairgrounds Road, West Friendship, MD 21794 2020 Festival Dates: May 2 & 3 CONTENTS Festival Map ........................................2 Sheep Breeds Display .....................118 2019 Sheep & Wool Festival Sheep Shearing Demonstrations
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Landowner: Poor Orphan Creamery
    Featured Landowner: Poor Orphan Creamery When Lark Gilmer bought a home in the Basque of France she learned sheep could be milked and she could use that milk to make cheese. by Jodie DeLay Extension External Relations Coordinator, Montana State University Grade school kids are her favorite; when they visit the tasting prohibitive, but that didn’t stop her. She researched state and room they “get it,” says Lark Gilmer of Poor Orphan Creamery. federal law and various funding opportunities and started Gilmer is a cheesemaker, a shepherd, a photographer, an down a path that only someone, she says, “with a border entrepreneur, a grant-writer, an innovator, an agricultural collie mentality, unwilling to let go,” would undertake. enthusiast, a mentor, and an educator. She is the founder and Montana law requires property owners to manage noxious owner of Montana’s first sheep dairy and Grade A portable weeds and applies penalties for violations (MCA 7-22-21). milking parlor. Gilmer observed that people were coming to Montana in hopes Born in Minnesota, Gilmer always had a love for sheep. Her of a country lifestyle and purchasing tracts of land that they career as a commercial photographer took her to England often didn’t have the time or knowledge to care for. Rather and France. There, she looked for opportunities to care for than buying her own land, she approached landowners and sheep, helping to lamb and learning from shepherds. In Oxford, offered to run her sheep on their land to help them meet weed she experienced cheesemaking with one of Britain’s leading management requirements for a lease agreement of one dollar.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep Farming As “An Arduous Livelihood”
    University of Alberta Cultivating Place, Livelihood, and the Future: An Ethnography of Dwelling and Climate in Western Greenland by Naotaka Hayashi A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology ©Naotaka Hayashi Spring 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract In order to investigate how Inuit Greenlanders in western Greenland are experiencing, responding to, and thinking about recent allegedly human-induced climate change, this dissertation ethnographically examines the lives of Greenlanders as well as Norse and Danes in the course of past historical natural climate cycles. My emphasis is on human endeavours to cultivate a future in the face of difficulties caused by climatic and environmental transformation. I recognize locals’ initiatives to carve out a future in the promotion of sheep farming and tree-planting in southern Greenland and in adaptation processes of northern Greenlandic hunters to the ever-shifting environment.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Breeder
    ® Today’s Breeder A Nestlé Purina Publication Dedicated to the Needs of Canine Enthusiasts Issue 74 BREEDER PROFILE Eternal Moon Rottweilers Odyssey German Shorthairs Retriever Trial Seminar Pug Dog Encephalitis Breeders Turned Show Judges old puppy. In April 2010, he went Best of Opposite Sex to Best of Variety (Smooth) at the Tri-County Collie Breeders Show. Vince will soon sire his first litter and continue his Specials career. I owe all his wins and success to Pro Plan and our regimen - Pro Club member Patti Simmons of Reed Creek Labs in Hartwell, Ga., shares this photo of her tal exercise program, which helps recent litter of 10 yellow Labrador Retriever puppies. keep him in great shape. I want to share this amazing Pro Club . All my puppies are raised on Jennifer Zappone photo of my recent litter sired by Pro Plan Chicken & Rice, and I feed Bluwave Collies Torrington, CT Temora Australian Terrier breeder Julie Seaton HRCH UH CH Kerrybrooks Vince, MH Pro Plan Chicken & Rice Shredded is shown with her Best of Opposite Sex winner (“Vince”) out of Ransom’s Alegría Blend to adult dogs. My dogs all I have been an exhibitor/breeder of at the 2010 National Specialty. @ ReedCreek, MH (“Alli”). What a have wonderful, shiny coats, and they Australian Terriers since 1995 and have wonderful litter. These 10 beautiful, eat well, which can be challenging always fed my dogs Purina Pro Plan At our 2010 National Specialty healthy puppies were started on Pro for the “picky” Collie. Performance and my puppies Pro Plan Show under judge Michelle Billings, Plan Selects puppy food, and I sent The first litter I bred produced a Puppy Chicken & Rice.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Greenland – Possibilities and Needs for Future Development and Research
    Agriculture in Greenland – possibilities and needs for future development and research Synthesis Report for Greenland Agricultural Initiative (GRAIN) in cooperation with Greenland Perspective November 2019 Colophon Editors of the report: Mikkel Høegh Bojesen PhD, Asiaq – Greenland Survey, Qatserisut 8, 3900 Nuuk Allan Olsen Project coordinator, Greenland Perspective, Ilisimatusarfik, Manutooq 1, 3900 Nuuk This report is financed by Ilisimatusarfik, the University of Greenland, and the Ministry of Fisheries, Hunting and Agriculture. Front page: Farm in Qassiarsuk Photo: Visit Greenland Graphic & print: Cebastian Rosing, ReneDesign ApS 2 Preface Agriculture in Greenland faces an uncertain future impacted significantly by a changing climate. It will influence the way farming in Greenland is carried out and the scope of agricultural development. Higher temperatures allow for better crop yields and feed production capability for livestock, as well as new crop, but are mixed with a higher degree of unpredictable weather and droughts, as well as the potential introduction of invasive species and pests. Agricultural management on a local and national level thusly is under pressure to create a framework within which the sector can adjust effectively and continue to contribute to the political ambitions of higher levels of local food production in Greenland. Modern agricultural farming in Greenland has a history of around 100 years. Sheep farming and grass production for fodder has been the focus of production but in recent years crops, such as potatoes and turnips, have been grown commercially and cattle introduced as a niche meat-producing livestock. All land in Greenland is public owned and no private property right exists. Hence, farmers do not own the land they manage.
    [Show full text]
  • Creamery Name Products Animal Type Location Amama, Ltd
    Creamery Name Products Animal Type Location aMaMa, Ltd. vegetable-based yogurts cow Romulus NY Amazing Acres Goat Dairy cheese goat PA Animal Farm cultured butter & buttermilk cow Orwell VT Appleton Creamery cheese goat, cow, sheep ME fluid milk line, cultured products, Jersey & Normande Balfour Farm Pittsfield ME fresh cheeses cows Baum Farm raw milk on-farm only Jersey cows Canaan VT Bobolink Dairy cheese Kerry cow Milford NJ Bufala di Vermont moved to Canada Bush Meadow Farm, LLC cheese, milk goat and cow Union CT Butterworks Farm yogurt, cream, kefir, buttermilk cow northern VT Caprine Delight raw fluid milk, aged cheese goat Gettysburg PA Cherry Grove Farm cheese cow Lawrenceville NJ Cooperstown Cheese Co. cheese Brown Swiss cows NY sorry, Washington D.C. Cowgirl Creamery location has closed Dancing Lamb Farm aged cheese Icelandic sheep Earlton NY Endless Mountains Cheesery cheese goat Wellsboro PA Finger Lakes Dexter Creamery kefir cheese Dexter cattle NY God's Country Creamery cheese cow Ulysses PA Griffin Farmstead milk and yogurt in season goat CT Gilmanton Iron Works, Heart Song Farm cheeses goat NH firm aged raw milk cheese, yogurt, Hickory Nut Farm goat Lee, NH fudge, caramel Hidden Hills Dairy, LLC cheese Jersey cow Everett PA Hollow Maple Farm milk and cheese goat Etna ME Lazy Crazy Acres bottled milk, ice cream, gelato cow Arkville NY raw milk and cheese, on-farm sales M&S Farm goat only Meadow Stone Farm cheese, raw goat's milk goat and cow CT Maine's Own Organic Milk (coop) fluid milk from Maine farms cow ME fluid milk
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Aspects of Sheep Grazing on Highland Rangelands in Iceland
    BS – thesis May 2019 Sheep in the Land of Fire and Ice- Socio-economic aspects of sheep grazing on highland rangelands in Iceland Anja Mager Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences BS – thesis May 2019 Sheep in the Land of Fire and Ice- Socio-economic aspects of sheep grazing on highland rangelands in Iceland Anja Mager Advisors: Isabel C. Barrio and Þórunn Pétursdóttir Agricultural University of Iceland Agricultural Sciences ii i Yfirlýsing Hér með lýsi ég því yfir að verkefni þetta er byggt á mínum eigin athugunum, er samið af mér og að það hefur hvorki að hluta né í heild verið lagt fram áður til hærri prófgráðu. ________________________________ Anja Mager ii Summary The aim of this thesis is to examine socio- economic aspects of sheep grazing on highland rangelands in Iceland in relation to sustainable land use practices by means of a literature review. Socio-economic aspects refer to the economic environment of sheep husbandry in Iceland, agricultural policies, laws and regulations on the subject, historical aspects and efforts to mitigate the environmental impacts of sheep grazing. The main findings reveal that sheep farms operate in a difficult economic environment, being highly dependent on subsidy payments. Grazing highland commons is a very cost-effective practice for sheep farmers in the short run. The legislation, regulation and implementation of sheep grazing involves several actors and a set of laws and regulations. The system is considered to be imperfect and does not lead to sustainable land management. Sheep grazing has a long tradition in Iceland although it seems likely that sheep grazing on highland rangelands was more sustainable in past times.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions List (Linda Coffey, NCAT/ATTRA, 2014)
    Frequently Asked Questions List (Linda Coffey, NCAT/ATTRA, 2014) You will want to maintain your own list as you get the same questions recurring; having a place to note a particularly good resource on the subject saves time and effort. Here are the questions in this collection. Selection/Getting Started 1) How long does a sheep or goat live? 2) How much should I pay for a doe? Ewe? Buck? Ram? 3) How many should I buy? 4) How do I know how many my land can support? 5) What breed is best to buy? 6) Should I raise goats or sheep? 7) I would raise sheep, but I don’t think I can find a shearer. 8) Can I make money with wool? Profitability/Marketing 9) Can I make a lot of money with sheep or goats? 10) How can I sell my sheep or goats? Health 11) What do I need to do when I bring a new animal home? 12) I’ve heard that a sick sheep is a dead sheep. Is that true? 13) Do we need to deworm our animals every month? 14) My animals are not anemic but they are not doing well. They have messy behinds and are looking thin. What is wrong? 15) I bought some animals at the sale barn, but now they are limping. What should I do? Nutrition, Grazing, Related Issues 16) How do I know what plants are poisonous to my animals? 17) How much should I feed my goats/sheep? 18) What kind of pasture/hay is best? 19) Will sheep and goats eat sericea? Facilities and Fences 20) What kind of barn do I need? 21) Should I have a working facility? 22) What kind of fencing is best for sheep or goats? If your question is not listed here, or you need further information, here are four places to look.
    [Show full text]