DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Quality of Rivers in the Duck River Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Quality of Rivers in the Duck River Catchment Water Quality of Rivers in the Duck River Catchment A Report Forming Part of the Requirements for ‘State of Rivers’ Reporting PART 4 Authors: Christopher Bobbi David Andrews Mark Bantich Environmental & Resource Analysis, Hydro Tasmania December 2003 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIWE (2003) State of the River Report for the Duck River Catchment. Water Assessment and Planning Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Technical Report No. WAP 03/08 ISSN: 1449-5996 The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources. The Mission of the Department is to advance Tasmania’s prosperity through the sustainable development of our natural resources and the conservation of our natural and cultural heritage for the future. The Water Resources Division provides a focus for water management and water development in Tasmania through a diverse range of functions including the design of policy and regulatory frameworks to ensure sustainable use of the surface water and groundwater resources; monitoring, assessment and reporting on the condition of the State’s freshwater resources; facilitation of infrastructure development projects to ensure the efficient and sustainable supply of water; and implementation of the Water Management Act 1999, related legislation and the State Water Development Plan. i 2.5 Diurnal Water Quality Variations During the study, continuous monitoring equipment was deployed at three sites within the Duck River. The sites investigated were: DR1 – Duck River at Bass Highway; DR4 – Duck River at Scotchtown Rd; and DR20 – Duck River at Roger River On one occasion, two multi-parameter loggers were deployed simultaneously to compare diurnal changes at a location in the upper reaches of the Duck River (DR20) with that occurring lower down the river (DR4), where nutrient input to the river was likely to be higher. The following section presents the data collected during these logging events and discusses the time series in relation to the nutrient data discussed in earlier sections. The diurnal pattern of change in water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH at DR1 was recorded in February 1999. The traces from this logging event are shown in Figure 2.40 and Figure 2.41, and were recorded during stable weather conditions. These data can be compared to a similar (but longer) logging event carried out site DR4 in February the following year (Figures 2.42 & 2.43). These traces show that the daily variation in water temperature in the lower reaches of the river during the middle of summer are typically about 2 oC. The traces also clearly show that the pattern and scale of daily changes is influenced by the prevailing weather conditions (Figure 2.42), and this also has some influence on changes in other parameters. The scale of daily variation in dissolved oxygen saturation is similar at both DR1 and DR4, with diurnal changes of about 10-15%. The minimum saturation levels at both sites tended to occur in the early hours of the morning (between 2AM and 6AM), although the minimum saturation level at DR4 was much lower than at DR1 downstream. Daily minimum saturation levels at DR4 fell below 70% on all four days of monitoring, and may be an indication of the impact of the heavy siltation and nutrient enrichment that has occurred at this site. There is a stream-gauging weir at this site that has encouraged the deposition of silt at this site, and prolific growth of Cumbungi (Typha spp.) and stock access immediately upstream are likely to have compounded this problem. The pH at both sites is alkaline, with daily changes mirroring that of changes in dissolved oxygen. Peaks in pH levels tend to coincide with peaks in dissolved oxygen. The data from all three logging events carried out in the upper Duck River at DR20 (Roger River) are plotted together to better illustrate seasonal changes as well as the diurnal variations at this site. These data were collected in January, February and March of 2000, when low flows and warm water temperatures were likely to have resulted in ‘high stress’ conditions. The data from this site (Figure 2.45) indicates that oxygen levels during the logging periods are consistently lower than those found downstream at site DR1 and DR4, with peak saturation only reaching about 68% and minimum levels of about 56%. The dissolved oxygen data from this site is confusing when considered in terms of riparian cover and instream condition, both of which are in a moderately healthy state (see other chapters of the ‘State of Rivers’ report). Unlike the two downstream sites that were examined (DR1 & DR4), there is no evidence of excessive deposition of silt at this site, and there appears to be a good input of native large woody debris to the river here. However, these data do corroborate the monthly monitoring data recorded at this site (see Figure 2.12), which shows that dissolved oxygen at this site is generally depressed compared to other sites in the catchment that were examined. Further examination of this situation may be warranted, though there is no indication that the low dissolved oxygen levels at this site are impacting on the health of the aquatic macroinvertebrate community. 54 19 100 18.5 18 90 17.5 Dissolved Oxygen (%Sat) Dissolved Water Temperature (Deg C) (Deg Temperature Water 17 80 16.5 Temperature DO% 16 70 23/02/99 9:00 23/02/99 21:00 24/02/99 9:00 24/02/99 21:00 25/02/99 9:00 25/02/99 21:00 Figure 2.40: Diurnal variation in temperature and dissolved oxygen during late February 1999 in the Duck River at Bass Highway (DR1). 19 8.2 18.5 8.1 18 17.5 8 Field pH Field Water Temperature (Deg C) (Deg Temperature Water 17 7.9 16.5 Temperature pH 16 7.8 23/02/99 9:00 23/02/99 21:00 24/02/99 9:00 24/02/99 21:00 25/02/99 9:00 25/02/99 21:00 Figure 2.41: Diurnal variation in temperature and pH during late February 1999 in the Duck River at Bass Highway (DR1). 55 21 90 20 80 19 70 Dissolved Oxygen (%Sat) Dissolved Water Temperature (Deg C) (Deg Temperature Water 18 60 Temperature DO% 17 50 21/02/00 12:00 22/02/00 12:00 23/02/00 12:00 24/02/00 12:00 25/02/00 12:00 Figure 2.42: Diurnal variation in temperature and dissolved oxygen during late February 2000 in the Duck River at Scotchtown (DR4). 20.5 8.05 8 20 7.95 19.5 7.9 19 7.85 18.5 7.8 Field pH 7.75 18 Water Temperature (Deg C) Temperature Water 7.7 17.5 7.65 17 Temperature 7.6 pH 16.5 7.55 21/02/00 12:00 22/02/00 12:00 23/02/00 12:00 24/02/00 12:00 25/02/00 12:00 Figure 2.43: Diurnal variation in temperature and pH during late February 2000 in the Duck River at Scotchtown (DR4). 56 18 16 14 Water Temperature (Deg C) (Deg Temperature Water 12 January February March 10 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:0 Time (24 Hour) Figure 2.44: Diurnal variation in water temperature in the Duck River at Roger River (DR20) recorded during temporary deployment of monitoring equipment in January, February and March 2000. 75.00 70.00 65.00 60.00 Dissolved Oxygen (%Sat) Oxygen Dissolved 55.00 January February March 50.00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 3:00 15:00 Time (24 Hour) Figure 2.45: Diurnal variation in dissolved oxygen saturation in the Duck River at Roger River (DR20) recorded during temporary deployment of monitoring equipment in January, February and March 2000. 57 3 Nutrient Load Estimates 3.1 Background Nutrient load estimates were derived from nutrient, suspended solids, turbidity and flow data collected from the Duck River at the Scotchtown Rd stream gauging site, 8 km upstream of the Smithton township (DR4). Nutrient data was collected by two methods; through regular monthly sampling and opportunistic sampling targeting flood events. Turbidity data was collected manually during monthly and flood sampling in addition to being logged continuously in conjunction with flow data from the site. Thirty five monthly nutrient samples were collected from DR4 between March 1999 and December 2001 in addition to 13 trimonthly general ions samples.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Natural Values in Tasmania
    Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania JUNE 2016 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Acknowledgements Thanks to the support we received in particular from Clarissa Murphy who gave six months as a volunteer in the first phase of the sea level rise risk assessment work. We also had considerable technical input from a range of people on various aspects of the work, including Hans and Annie Wapstra, Richard Schahinger, Tim Rudman, John Church, and Anni McCuaig. We acknowledge the hard work over a number of years from the Sea Level Rise Impacts Working Group: Oberon Carter, Louise Gilfedder, Felicity Faulkner, Lynne Sparrow (DPIPWE), Eric Woehler (BirdLife Tasmania) and Chris Sharples (University of Tasmania). This report was compiled by Oberon Carter, Felicity Faulkner, Louise Gilfedder and Peter Voller from the Natural Values Conservation Branch. Citation DPIPWE (2016) Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania. Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-74380-009-6 Cover View to Mount Cameron West by Oberon Carter. Pied Oystercatcher by Mick Brown. The Pied Oystercatcher is considered to have a very high exposure to sea level rise under both a national assessment and Tasmanian assessment. Its preferred habitat is mudflats, sandbanks and sandy ocean beaches, all vulnerable to inundation and erosion. Round-leaved Pigface (Disphyma australe) in flower in saltmarsh at Lauderdale by Iona Mitchell. Three saltmarsh communities are associated with the coastal zone and are considered at risk from sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Explorer
    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Acid Drainage Reconnaissance 2. Distribution of Acid Sulphate Soils in Tasmania
    TasmanianTasmanian Acid Acid DrainageDrainage Reconnaissance Reconnaissance ReportReport 2 2 DistributionDistribution of of acidacid sulphate sulphate soilssoils in in Tasmania Tasmania MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Tasmania Record 2001/06 DEPARTMENT of Trust INFRASTRUCTURE, Helping Communities ENERGYand RESOURCES Helping Australia Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Record 2001/06 Trust Tasmania Helping Communities Helping Australia Tasmanian Acid Drainage Reconnaissance 2. Distribution of acid sulphate soils in Tasmania Dr Shivaraj Gurung FOREWORD Acid sulphate soils are pyritic sediments that can produce acid when exposed to oxidising conditions. These sediments typically occur in low-lying coastal areas, backswamps and in estuarine environments. The acid drainage resulting from the disturbance of acid sulphate soils can dissolve and mobilise toxic metals which can enter the receiving environment, causing serious damage to the aquatic ecosystem. Acid water and heavy metal pollution from the disturbance of acid sulphate soils is a major strategic environmental issue for management of coastal regions around Australia. Section 36.1 of the Tasmanian State Policy on Water Quality Management (1997) requires that “a survey is carried out to identify Tasmanian soils and surface geology with the potential to give rise to highly acidic drainage if disturbed or developed”. This reconnaissance investigation provides a basis for this objective. The program is a component of the proposed State Water Quality and Quantity programs and was largely funded by the National Heritage Trust. Water analyses were carried out by the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment at the Analytical Services Tasmania laboratory. Geochemical analyses, map production and project management were carried out by Mineral Resources Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Key Estuaries Internal Report
    Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Establishing key estuaries and coastal waters for monitoring in the Cradle Coast NRM region Christine Crawford and Camille White Marine Research Laboratories – Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, Tasmania, 7053. Project description This is an NRM funded project being run through Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (University of Tasmania) in Hobart for a duration of approximately 12 months. This project is an extension of past and current work on environmental condition of estuaries conducted by the Estuarine Ecology group at TAFI. It builds on a similar project “Establishment of an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Georges Bay”. We hope to implement a similar process with estuaries and coastal waters in the Cradle Coast region, aiming to involve as many stakeholders as possible including councils, community groups, industries, state government and research institutes. TAFI Internal Report Page i Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Table of contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND OF THE CRADLE COAST REGION.........................................................................................................3 IMPORTANCE OF ESTUARIES AND COASTAL WATERS IN THE CRADLE COAST REGION.......................................................................................9 WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ECOSYSTEM VALUES
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Proposals
    (No. 71.) 18 91~ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. PU·BLIC WORKS PROPOSALS: .. Memorandum of Public, Works Proposals for the Year 1891, together with Statement of approximate Balances available from former Votes and from Funds derived- under the provisions of the Waste Lands Acts. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by His Excellency's Command. MEMORAJ.YDUM of Public Worhs Pr·oposals f01· the Yem· 1891, together with Statement of approximate Balances available from , j ormer Votes and from Funds derived unde,r the provisions of the Waste Lands Acts. · MAIN ROADS. £ £ 1. Detention to Black River ............................................- ..... .. 1000 2. Detention to Cam ........................................................... 800 3. Launceston to Beaconsfield ................ : .................. : ........ ~ .. 1000 4. Launceston to George Town (near i3th mile-post) ................ .. 400 5. Brearlalbane to Evan dale ................................................ .. 300 6. Scottsdale to Ringarooma .................................................. 500 7. Branxhohn Lane ........................................................... 500 8. Brothers' Horne to Moorina .............................................. .. 250 9. W eldboroil~h to Moorina .................................................. 500 10. George's Bay to Lottah ............................................... .. 1000 11. St. Ma·ry's to Scamander .................................................. 400 12. Campar{ia to Swansea ....................................... : ............
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7-2 Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) Report for the Risk EMBA
    Environment plan Appendix 7-2 Protected matters search tool (PMST) report for the Risk EMBA Stromlo-1 exploration drilling program Equinor Australia B.V. Level 15 123 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Australia February 2019 www.equinor.com.au EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 13/09/18 14:02:20 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 1.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: 11 National Heritage Places: 13 Wetlands of International Importance: 13 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: 2 Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 14 Listed Threatened Species: 311 Listed Migratory Species: 97 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of Rivers in the Coal Catchment
    Water Quality of Rivers in the Coal Catchment A Report Forming Part of the Requirements for State of Rivers Reporting PART 5 Abigail Foley & Chris Bobbi Water Assessment and Planning Branch DPIWE. December 2003 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIWE (2003) State of the River Report for the Coal River Catchment. Water Assessment and Planning Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Technical Report No. WAP 03/11 ISSN: 1449-5996 The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works
    (No. 53.) PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum of Proposals for the Year 1889, together with Statement of Approximate Balances available from former Votes and from Funds derived under the Provisions of the vVaste Lands Acts. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by His Excellency's Command. MEMORANDUiW. of Public Worhs Proposals for the Year 1889, together with Statement of approximate Balances available from former Votes and from Funds derived under the provisions <if the Waste Lands Acts. MAIN ROADS. £ Blark River Bridge to Detention ........................................... .. 300 Detention to Sisters' Creek ..................................................... 300 Sisters' Creek to Cooee Creek .................................................. 200 Main Coast Road, west Penguin Township, from the Pine Road ..... 250 Torquay to N orthdown ........................................................... 500 Railton to Sheffield (Turnbull's Hill) ....................., ................... 700 Launceston to Beaconsfield ...................................................... 1000 Lisle Road to Scottsdale, Tucker's Corners ................................ 250 Scottsdale to Ringarooma ........................................................ 600 Branxholm Lane ............................ , .................................... 200 George's Bay to Lottah ...............................................· ... ·····:· 500 Searle's Corners to Swansea (Runnymede to Little Swanport) ........ 800 Little Swanport to Swansea ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania's River Geomorphology
    Tasmania’s river geomorphology: stream character and regional analysis. Volume 1 Kathryn Jerie, Ian Houshold and David Peters Nature Conservation Report 03/5 Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE June 2003 Cover Photos: Top: James River on the Central Plateau. Bottom left: Vanishing Falls on the Salisbury River, southern Tasmania (photo by Rolan Eberhard). Bottom right: Sorrel River, south of Macquarie Harbour. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank many people for support and advice on many diverse topics during the course of this project, including: Damon Telfer, Emma Watt, Fiona Wells, Geoff Peters, Guy Lampert, Helen Locher, Helen Morgan, Jason Bradbury, John Ashworth, John Corbett, John Gooderham, Kath Sund, Lee Drummond, Leon Barmuta, Matt Brook, Mike Askey-Doran, Mike Pemberton, Mike Temple- Smith, Penny Wells, Peter Cale, Sharon Cunial, Simon Pigot, and Wengui Su. In particular, we would like to thank Chris Sharples for extensive advice on the influence of geology on geomorphology in Tasmania, and many discussions on this and other useful topics. For the use of river characterisation data, we wish to thank: Guy Lampert, Damon Telfer, Peter Stronach, Daniel Sprod, and Andy Baird. We thank Chris Sharples, Rolan Eberhard and Jason Bradbury for the use of photographs. This project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust. ISSN No. 1441 0680 i Table of Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... i Table of Contents .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. the River Environmental Domains - Results and Technical Discussion
    Chapter 5. The river environmental domains - results and technical discussion Chapter 5. The river environmental domains - results and technical discussion The Environmental Domain Analysis (EDA) resulted in a map that included 489 different river environment domains, many of which occurred in multiple patches. To avoid confusion it is worth defining some terms here. A patch refers to a single area that has been found by the analysis to be internally consistent in terms of the system controls on river development. A domain is composed of one or more patches that are similar. In other words, a domain is an internally consistent area, that can occur as spatially separate patches. These patches might be separated by small or large distances. All together, there were 129 thousand patches of river landscape identified in the state. The domains are named arbitrarily by number. The statewide EDA is shown in Figure 36. Each domain tells you something about the local environment, and puts those local conditions in a state wide context. If you know which domain you are standing in, you know that your immediate surrounding will fit within the characteristic range of values of system controls for that domain, and you know where similar landscapes occur throughout the state. If, for example, you are standing on the Pinnacle Track on the very edge of the Mount Wellington Plateau, you are in a patch of domain number 211. This tells you that you are in a high relief area, with slopes that vary from moderate to very steep. You are on dolerite lithostructure, and the area has been subject to periglacial and possibly also aeolian processes, and was possibly covered by ice during the maximum glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • River Modelling for Tasmania Volume 1: the Arthur-Inglis-Cam Region
    River modelling for Tasmania Volume 1: the Arthur-Inglis-Cam region Ling FLN, Gupta V, Willis M, Bennett JC, Robinson KA, Paudel K, Post DA and Marvanek S A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Tasmania Sustainable Yields Project December 2009 Contributors Project Management: David Post, Tom Hatton, Mac Kirby, Therese McGillion and Linda Merrin Report Production: Frances Marston, Susan Cuddy, Maryam Ahmad, William Francis, Becky Schmidt, Siobhan Duffy, Heinz Buettikofer, Alex Dyce, Simon Gallant, Chris Maguire and Ben Wurcker Project Team: CSIRO: Francis Chiew, Neil Viney, Glenn Harrington, Jin Teng, Ang Yang, Glen Walker, Jack Katzfey, John McGregor, Kim Nguyen, Russell Crosbie, Steve Marvanek, Dewi Kirono, Ian Smith, James McCallum, Mick Hartcher, Freddie Mpelasoka, Jai Vaze, Andrew Freebairn, Janice Bathols, Randal Donohue, Li Lingtao, Tim McVicar and David Kent Tasmanian Department of Bryce Graham, Ludovic Schmidt, John Gooderham, Shivaraj Gurung, Primary Industries, Parks, Miladin Latinovic, Chris Bobbi, Scott Hardie, Tom Krasnicki, Danielle Hardie and Water and Environment: Don Rockliff Hydro Tasmania Consulting: Fiona Ling, Mark Willis, James Bennett, Vila Gupta, Kim Robinson, Kiran Paudel and Keiran Jacka Sinclair Knight Merz: Stuart Richardson, Dougal Currie, Louise Anders and Vic Waclavik Aquaterra Consulting: Hugh Middlemis, Joel Georgiou and Katharine Bond Tasmania Sustainable Yields Project acknowledgments Prepared by CSIRO for the Australian Government under the Water for the Future Plan of the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Important aspects of the work were undertaken by the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment; Hydro Tasmania Consulting; Sinclair Knight Merz; and Aquaterra Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of Rivers in the Inglis – Flowerdale Catchment
    Water Quality of Rivers in the Inglis – Flowerdale Catchment PART 4 Authors: Christopher Bobbi David Andrews & Mark Bantich Environmental & Resource Analysis, Hydro Tasmania December 2003 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIWE (2003) State of the River Report for the Inglis-Flowerdale Catchment. Water Assessment and Planning Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Technical Report No. WAP 03/12 ISSN: 1449-5996 The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources.
    [Show full text]