DOCSLIB.ORG

Tasmania's River Geomorphology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tasmania's River Geomorphology Tasmania’s river geomorphology: stream character and regional analysis. Volume 1 Kathryn Jerie, Ian Houshold and David Peters Nature Conservation Report 03/5 Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE June 2003 Cover Photos: Top: James River on the Central Plateau. Bottom left: Vanishing Falls on the Salisbury River, southern Tasmania (photo by Rolan Eberhard). Bottom right: Sorrel River, south of Macquarie Harbour. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank many people for support and advice on many diverse topics during the course of this project, including: Damon Telfer, Emma Watt, Fiona Wells, Geoff Peters, Guy Lampert, Helen Locher, Helen Morgan, Jason Bradbury, John Ashworth, John Corbett, John Gooderham, Kath Sund, Lee Drummond, Leon Barmuta, Matt Brook, Mike Askey-Doran, Mike Pemberton, Mike Temple- Smith, Penny Wells, Peter Cale, Sharon Cunial, Simon Pigot, and Wengui Su. In particular, we would like to thank Chris Sharples for extensive advice on the influence of geology on geomorphology in Tasmania, and many discussions on this and other useful topics. For the use of river characterisation data, we wish to thank: Guy Lampert, Damon Telfer, Peter Stronach, Daniel Sprod, and Andy Baird. We thank Chris Sharples, Rolan Eberhard and Jason Bradbury for the use of photographs. This project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust. ISSN No. 1441 0680 i Table of Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... i Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures............................................................................................................ iv Table of Tables............................................................................................................ vii Summary ......................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................1 Why do we need more information on rivers? ...............................................................1 Why focus on geomorphology?......................................................................................3 Chapter 2. River characterisation, classification and regionalisation.................................9 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Why is stream classification difficult? ...........................................................................9 Existing approaches to describing river character from field, aerial photos and map based data .............................................................................................................14 Existing approaches to predicting river form and character.........................................17 Approaches to landform and landscape classification in Tasmania .............................18 The approaches used in this study ................................................................................19 Chapter 3. Methods ..........................................................................................................23 The Environmental Domain Analysis ..........................................................................23 Landscape scale analysis of domains ...........................................................................26 River characterisation...................................................................................................26 State wide analysis of river characterisations...............................................................27 Chapter 4. What are the geomorphic controls on Tasmania’s rivers?..............................29 Lithostructural elements ...............................................................................................29 Climate .........................................................................................................................48 Geomorphic process history regions ............................................................................51 Topography ..................................................................................................................61 Other influences on stream geomorphology.................................................................62 Chapter 5. The river environmental domains - results and technical discussion..............67 An overview of the relationship between domains and system controls......................69 Identifying larger scale patterns – mosaics and subregions in the Upper Macquarie Catchment.....................................................................................................................77 Conclusions and improvements that could be made to the Environmental Domain Analysis........................................................................................................................78 Chapter 6. Putting the picture together: linking river landscapes and river character......81 Things to consider when linking river landscapes to river character ...........................81 Overview of the case study area...................................................................................84 Apsley Uplands ............................................................................................................85 Apsley Lowlands..........................................................................................................86 Crest of the Eastern Tiers .............................................................................................89 East Draining Uplands..................................................................................................90 East Draining Foothills.................................................................................................93 East Draining Lowlands ...............................................................................................93 West Draining Uplands ................................................................................................95 ii West Draining Basalt Basin..........................................................................................96 The Pink Mosaics .........................................................................................................96 Eastern Tiers Western Foothills ...................................................................................98 Midlands boundary and Macquarie Tier ......................................................................99 Midlands.......................................................................................................................99 An overview of the domain mosaics and the system controls on river development and behaviour in the case study area. .........................................................................102 The relationship between river landscapes and river form and behaviour in the case study area............................................................................................................103 Conclusions ................................................................................................................104 Chapter 7. Field based characterisation and classification of rivers...............................105 Introduction ................................................................................................................105 River characterisations completed for this project .....................................................105 A comparison of existing characterisations around the state......................................105 The Taswide classification .........................................................................................107 Limitations of existing river characterisations ...........................................................110 Chapter 8. Conclusions and recommendations...............................................................113 Recommendations ......................................................................................................115 References cited .............................................................................................................117 Volume 2. Appendices Appendix 1. Conversion from 1:250,000 geology map codes to lithostructural elements....................................................................................................................... A1-1 Appendix 2. Development of the peat process region from Kirkpatrick and Dickinson (1984) vegetation codes ............................................................................. A2-1 Appendix 3. Regionalisation Results 1. The relationship between the stream domains and the system controls on river development and behaviour ...................... A3-1 Appendix 4. Regionalisation Results 2. The domains found in the case study area sub-regional domain mosaics ...................................................................................... A4-1 Appendix 5. Regionalisation Results 3. The domain based variability in system controls in the domain mosaics of the upper Macquarie and Apsley case study area. A5-1 Appendix 6. Regionalisation Results 4. The Upper Macquarie and Aplsey domain mosaics and the system controls on river development and behaviour......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Convict Labour and Colonial Society in the Campbell Town Police District: 1820-1839
    Convict Labour and Colonial Society in the Campbell Town Police District: 1820-1839. Margaret C. Dillon B.A. (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.) University of Tasmania April 2008 I confirm that this thesis is entirely my own work and contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Margaret C. Dillon. -ii- This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Margaret C. Dillon -iii- Abstract This thesis examines the lives of the convict workers who constituted the primary work force in the Campbell Town district in Van Diemen’s Land during the assignment period but focuses particularly on the 1830s. Over 1000 assigned men and women, ganged government convicts, convict police and ticket holders became the district’s unfree working class. Although studies have been completed on each of the groups separately, especially female convicts and ganged convicts, no holistic studies have investigated how convicts were integrated into a district as its multi-layered working class and the ways this affected their working and leisure lives and their interactions with their employers. Research has paid particular attention to the Lower Court records for 1835 to extract both quantitative data about the management of different groups of convicts, and also to provide more specific narratives about aspects of their work and leisure.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Need to Be Changed at All)
    (v.1 Please let me know if the minutes need to be changed at all) Kevin Turner RDA Tasmania Mobile: 0419395178 Email: [email protected] MINUTES Local Government Economic Development Network Thursday 28th August 2020 Online via Zoom 2pm to 4pm Attendees Thanks to the 28 who attended and welcome to those joined for the first time: Adriaan Stander (Kingborough Council: Strategic Planner), Bill Duhig (Skills Tasmania: Project Manager), Bruce Williams (City of Launceston: Economic Development Officer), Carol Bracken (Cradle Coast Authority: Program Manager - Regional Futures Plan), Carolyn Coates (Hobart City Council: International Relations | Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy | Community Life), Craig Perkins (RDA Tasmania: Chief Executive Officer & Director Regional Development), Erin McGoldrick (Glenorchy City Council: Manager City Strategy and Economic Development), Fiona Ranson (City of Launceston: Urban Design & Heritage Planner), Jackie Harvey (State Growth: Project Manager), Jaime Parsons (City of Launceston: Team Leader Place Making, Liveable Communities), Jane Eldershaw (State Growth: Project Manager Antarctic Tasmania and Regional Coordination), Jen Newman (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Kevin Turner (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Linda Seeborn (Skills Tasmania: Manager, Workforce Policy and Programs), Lucy Knot (Hobart City Council: Economic Development Project Officer), Luke Doyle (Hobart City Council: Manager Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy), Marilyn
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development Information to Accompany
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.6 TO D’ENTRECASTEAUX CHANNEL MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2002 PROPONENT: TASSAL OPERATIONS PTY LTD Glossary ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council BAP Best Aquaculture Practices BEMP Broadscale Environmental Monitoring Program CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement CEO Chief Executive Officer COBP Code of Best Practice CSER corporate, social and environmental responsibility CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DAFF Depart of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry dBA A-weighted decibels DMB Dry matter basis DO dissolved oxygen DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment EDO Environmental Defenders Office ENGOs environmental non-governmental organisations EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Ratio FHMP Fish Health Management Plan FSANZ Food Standards Australia New Zealand g gram GAA Global Aquaculture Alliance ha hectare HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HOG head on gutted HVN Huon Valley News IALA International Association of Lighthouse Authorities IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies i JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement kg kilogram km kilometre L litre LED light-emitting diode m metre mm millimetre MAST Marine and Safety
    [Show full text]
  • Tas Catchment Selection.Indd
    Technical Report No. 1 Selecting catchments for the retrospective study of land-use and water quality September 2007 Published September 2007 This publication is available for download as a PDF from www.landscapelogic.org.au LANDSCAPE LOGIC is a research hub under the Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities scheme, managed by the Department of Environment, Water Heritage and the Arts. It is a partnership between: • six regional organisations – the North Central, North East & Goulburn–Broken Catchment Management Authorities in Victoria and the North, South and Cradle Coast Natural Resource Management organisations in Tasmania; • five research institutions – University of Tasmania, Australian National University, RMIT University, Charles Sturt University and NORTH CENTRAL Catchment CSIRO; and Management Authority • state land management agencies in Tasmania and Victoria – the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries & Water, Forestry Tasmania and the Victorian Department of Sustainability & Environment. The purpose of Landscape Logic is to work in partnership with regional natural resource managers to develop decision-making approaches that improve the effectiveness of environmental management. Landscape Logic aims to: 1. Develop better ways to organise existing knowledge and assumptions about links between land management actions and environmental outcomes. 2. Improve our understanding of the links between land management actions and environmental outcomes through historical studies of the effects of private and public investment on water quality and native vegetation condition. Selecting catchments for the retrospective study of land-use and water quality By Bill Cotching, UTAS Summary This report describes the criteria and process use to select Tasmanian catchments in a study of the relationships between land use, land management and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Dpiw – Surface Water Models Mersey River Catchment
    DPIW – SURFACE WATER MODELS MERSEY RIVER CATCHMENT Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 DOCUMENT INFORMATION JOB/PROJECT TITLE Surface Water Hydrological Models for DPIW CLIENT ORGANISATION Department of Primary Industries and Water CLIENT CONTACT Bryce Graham DOCUMENT ID NUMBER WR 2007/027 JOB/PROJECT MANAGER Mark Willis JOB/PROJECT NUMBER E200690/P202167 Document History and Status Revision Prepared Reviewed Approved Date Revision by by by approved type 1.0 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2007 Final Ling 1.1 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2008 Final Ling Current Document Approval PREPARED BY James Bennett Water Resources Mngt Sign Date REVIEWED BY Dr Fiona Ling Water Resources Mngt Sign Date APPROVED FOR Crispin Smythe SUBMISSION Water Resources Mngt Sign Date Current Document Distribution List Organisation Date Issued To DPIW July 2008 Bryce Graham The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Hydro Tasmania. This document may only be used for the purposes of assessing our offer of services and for inclusion in documentation for the engagement of Hydro Tasmania. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part for any other purpose without the written permission of Hydro Tasmania constitutes an infringement of copyright. i Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the results of the hydrological model developed for the Mersey River catchment in central-north Tasmania. This report is one of a series of reports that present the methods and results from the development and calibration of surface water hydrological models for 26 Tasmanian catchments under both current and natural flow conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage
    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tas Talk… the Movie the Cast, Their Stories and the Best Supporting Actress…Tasmania
    TAS TALK… THE MOVIE THE CAST, THEIR STORIES AND THE BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS…TASMANIA Kayaking on the Pieman River © Michael Walters Photography Behind the Scenes, Hobart © HypeTV –––– A journey to Tasmania is a rare chance to disconnect from stress and reconnect with the things that matter. Geographic isolation has contributed to unique biodiversity, and it has also fostered a rare community of creative, down-to-earth, resourceful people with time to make you feel welcome. We are all working in unusual circumstances and although this year we were unable to deliver our much sought after TasTalk trade event in its standard format, we know you need to connect with Tasmanian tourism operators. So, we are bringing the TasTalk trade event experience to you! This is TasTalk...The Movie, an opportunity for you to listen and connect with Tasmanians over a live platform. Featuring the stars of our tourism industry, this is set to be a movie like you have never seen before. One of the joys of travelling in Tasmania is not just the chance to taste produce straight from the farm and ocean, but the ease of meeting the makers at cellar doors, farm gates and local markets. And with four distinct seasons, there’s always something new to see, taste and feel. TasTalk...The Movie will speak to all of this and more. Tasmania is a place for adventure, however, you define it. Whether the view is from the privacy of a hot tub in a forest, or from a kayak for two, or fireside with Tassie whisky and friends, the world looks different from Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Natural Values in Tasmania
    Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania JUNE 2016 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Acknowledgements Thanks to the support we received in particular from Clarissa Murphy who gave six months as a volunteer in the first phase of the sea level rise risk assessment work. We also had considerable technical input from a range of people on various aspects of the work, including Hans and Annie Wapstra, Richard Schahinger, Tim Rudman, John Church, and Anni McCuaig. We acknowledge the hard work over a number of years from the Sea Level Rise Impacts Working Group: Oberon Carter, Louise Gilfedder, Felicity Faulkner, Lynne Sparrow (DPIPWE), Eric Woehler (BirdLife Tasmania) and Chris Sharples (University of Tasmania). This report was compiled by Oberon Carter, Felicity Faulkner, Louise Gilfedder and Peter Voller from the Natural Values Conservation Branch. Citation DPIPWE (2016) Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania. Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-74380-009-6 Cover View to Mount Cameron West by Oberon Carter. Pied Oystercatcher by Mick Brown. The Pied Oystercatcher is considered to have a very high exposure to sea level rise under both a national assessment and Tasmanian assessment. Its preferred habitat is mudflats, sandbanks and sandy ocean beaches, all vulnerable to inundation and erosion. Round-leaved Pigface (Disphyma australe) in flower in saltmarsh at Lauderdale by Iona Mitchell. Three saltmarsh communities are associated with the coastal zone and are considered at risk from sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersey River Anglers Access
    EDITION 3 Protect our Waters Recreational anglers have a responsibility to look after Mersey River fisheries resources for the benefit of the environment and future generations. • Do not bring live or dead fish, fish products, animals Anglers or aquatic plants into Tasmania. • Do not bring any used fishing gear or any other Access freshwater recreational equipment that may be damp, wet or contain water into Tasmania. Check, clean and dry your fishing equipment before REGION: NORTH WEST entering Tasmania. • Do not transfer any freshwater fish, frogs, tadpoles, invertebrates or plants between inland waters. • Check your boat, trailer, waders and fishing gear for weed and other pests that should not be transferred before moving between waters. • Do not use willow (which is a plant pest) as a rod support as it has the ability to propagate from a cutting. Warning ANGLING DEEP SLIPPERY REGULATIONS WATER SURFACES APPLY STRONG ELECTRIC FALLING CURRENTS FENCE TREES AND LIMBS CONTACT DETAILS 17 Back River Road, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: 1300 INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au STEEP BANKS CATTLE Caution: Environmental water releases from Lake Parangana may cause the river to rise suddenly. BL11111 Inland Fisheries Service Getting There Angling Notes Angling Regulations The Mersey River rises on the Central Plateau south of Like many Tasmanian rivers, the Mersey boasts deep, To fish in any open public inland water in Tasmania Lake Rowallan and enters Bass Strait at Devonport. This slow-flowing pools and shallow fast sections of water you must hold a current Inland Angling Licence unless brochure refers to a 55 km stretch of the river from Lake that produce good quality trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Explorer
    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Seismic Risk for Hydro Tasmania's Dams
    MANAGING SEISMIC RISK FOR HYDRO TASMANIA'S DAMS ANDREW PATILE HYDRO TASMANIA INVITED SPEAKER Andrew Pattie has held the position of Dam Safety Manager with Hydro Tasmania for the last 4 years and is responsible for managing the safety of 54 dams. Prior to his current position, Andrew had 10 years experience as a civil engineer in the hydro-electric power industry in New Zealand. Dam owners devote considerable resources to managing seismic risks in New Zealand's dynamic landscape, and Andrew has been involved in a large number of earthquake engineering projects, ranging from seismotectonic studies to post-earthquake inspections of damaged facilities. (Full paper not available at time ofprinting) Experience from a number of large earthquakes worldwide has shown that dams have a very good seismic resistance, and have caused essentially nil loss of life during the last two decades. In the same period, there have been several hundred thousand fatalities due to earthquake effects such as building collapses, tsunamis, landslides and post-earthquake fires. The excellent seismic performance record of dams, together with the low level of seismic activity in Tasmania, indicates that Hydro Tasmania's dams pose an infinitesimal risk to the population of Tasmania. However, seismic risks cannot be completely ignored and responsible dam ownership requires that they still need to be considered as part of risk management activities. This paper describes Hydro Tasmania's approach to managing seismic risk for their 54 dams. The primary activities are: • determining regional and site specific seismic hazard • re-assessing the seismic resistance of dams, using analysis techniques and knowledge of precedent behaviour of dams during earthquakes • ensuring emergency preparedness includes post-earthquake response procedures.
    [Show full text]