DOCSLIB.ORG

Endophytic Fungi of Olive Tree and Their Exploitation in the Biological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ESCUELA SUPERIOR Y TÉCNICA DE INGENIERÍA AGRARIA INGENIERÍA DE BIOSISTEMAS Endophytic fungi of olive tree and their exploitation in the biological control of olive anthracnose Doctoral Thesis Maria de Fátima Tomé Martins Director: Professora Doutora Paula Cristina Santos Baptista León 2020 ESCUELA SUPERIOR Y TÉCNICA DE INGENIERÍA AGRARIA INGENIERÍA DE BIOSISTEMAS Hongos endofíticos del olivo y su aprovechamiento para el control biológico de la antracnosis del olivo Tesis Doctoral Maria de Fátima Tomé Martins Director: Profesora Doctora Paula Cristina Santos Baptista León 2020 This research was supported by FEDER funds through the COMPETE (Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors) and by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) within the POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031133 project and FCT/MCTES to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020), as well as the Horizon 2020, the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for financial support the project PRIMA/0002/2018. Fátima Martins also thanks the individual research grant ref. SFRH / BD / 112234/2015 award by FCT. The studies presented in this thesis were performed at the AgroBioTechnology Laboratory, at the Mountain Research Centre (CIMO), School of Agriculture Polytechnic Institute of Bragança. Às minhas filhas Acknowledgements Neste momento, é com enorme gosto e satisfação que agradeço a todos aqueles que direta ou indiretamente contribuíram para a realização e conclusão deste trabalho. Em primeiro lugar gostaria de agradecer em especial à minha orientadora. À Professora Doutora Paula Cristina dos Santos Baptista, da Escola Superior Agrária, por toda a orientação prestada durante a realização do trabalho ao nível laboratorial e escrito, bem como, por todo o conhecimento transmitido, paciência, disponibilidade e acima de tudo pela amizade e carinho demonstrados ao longo destes anos. Por me ajudar a crescer como pessoa e como profissional, pelo apoio incondicional prestado mesmo nas horas menos fáceis, por acreditar nas minhas capacidades e me incentivar sempre. Muito obrigada! Ao professor José Alberto pelo suporte de apoio nos trabalhos realizados, pelos conselhos sempre sábios na orientação das amostragens de campo, pela confiança demonstrada. Muito obrigada! O meu agradecimento aos amigos e colegas de laboratório que estiveram diariamente presentes na constante boa disposição, companheirismo, pela partilha de ideias e angústias que me acompanharam ao longo deste percurso, agradeço ao Diogo Mina, Cristina Cameirão, Lara Pinheiro, Rosalina Marrão, Ricardo Malheiro, Nuno Rodrigues, Jacinto Benhadi-Marín, Maria Villa, Teresa Gomes, Luana Fernandes. Agradeço também a todos aqueles que estiveram só de passagem, mas onde deixaram a sua marca. Agradeço à Maria Villa pela ajuda prestada com a tradução do espanhol. Quero agradecer também às técnicas de laboratório, D. Isabel, D. Fátima, D. Arminda e à D. Céu Fidalgo pelo apoio e auxílio prestado. Agradeço ao Professor Doutor Pedro Casquero, da Escuela Superior y Técnica de Ingeniería Agraria da Universidad de León, pelo apoio prestado ao longo deste percurso. Por fim quero agradecer aqueles que são o meu suporte incondicional, que estão sempre presentes, aconteça o que acontecer: Aos meus pais, a quem devo tudo o que sou aos meus irmãos e sobrinhos pelo amor e carinho, incentivo, apoio incondicional. A ti, Paulo, por estares ao meu lado pela paciência, compreensão e companheirismo constante. Ao meu maior bem da vida, a quem me enche o coração todos os dias de amor e carinho, às minhas filhas. Grata por tudo! Table of contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….... i Resumen ……………………………………………………………………………. ii List of Abbreviations………………………….………………………………...xxviii Chapter 1 - General Introduction ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Framework and objectives ...................................................................................... 2 1.2 Olive Anthracnose: A general overview ................................................................. 4 1.3 Anthracnose is caused by a complex of Colletotrichum species ............................ 5 1.4 Epidemiology and life cycle ................................................................................... 6 1.5 Management strategies for olive anthracnose ......................................................... 8 1.6 Fungal endophytes and their potential as biocontrol agents against Colletotrichum spp. ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.7. Fungal endophytes on the control of olive anthracnose....................................... 15 1.8 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 17 1.9 References ............................................................................................................. 17 Chapter 2 - Endophytic fungal community succession in reproductive organs of two olive tree cultivars ......................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 25 2.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Materials and methods .......................................................................................... 27 2.3.1 Samples collection.......................................................................................... 27 2.3.2 Isolation of endophytic fungi ......................................................................... 28 2.3.3 Identification of fungal isolates ...................................................................... 29 2.3.4 Abundance and diversity of fungal endophytes ............................................. 30 2.3.5 Data analysis .................................................................................................. 30 2.4 Results ................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.1 Diversity and composition of endophytes differ between cultivars ............... 32 2.4.2 Diversity and composition of endophytes in reproductive organs over different phenological stages ................................................................................................. 33 2.4.3 Plant organ and phenological stage are the most important factors for shaping the fungal community.............................................................................................. 38 2.4.4 Cultivar- and phenological stage preference of endophytic fungi ................. 38 2.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 41 2.5.1 Contribution of plant organ and host genotype on endophytic fungal assembly ................................................................................................................................. 42 2.5.2 Patterns of plant-endophyte association over different time points of inflorescence and fruit development ....................................................................... 44 2.5.3 Can differences in susceptibility of the cultivars to anthracnose be related to the endophytic community naturally present in inflorescence and fruit? ............... 45 2.6 References ............................................................................................................. 46 2.7 Supporting Information ......................................................................................... 54 Chapter 3 - Endophytic fungal community structure in olive orchards with high and low incidence of olive anthracnose .............................................................................. 60 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 62 3.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 62 3.3 Materials and methods .......................................................................................... 64 3.3.1 Study area and plant material collection ........................................................ 64 3.3.2 Anthracnose incidence and severity ............................................................... 66 3.3.3 Endophytic fungi isolation ............................................................................. 66 3.3.4 Identification of endophytic fungi .................................................................. 67 3.3.5 Diversity and structure of fungal community ................................................ 67 3.3.6 Factors driving fungal community structure .................................................. 68 3.3.7 Identification of fungal OTUs associated with each orchard or plant organ . 69 3.4 Results ................................................................................................................... 69 3.4.1 Anthracnose incidence and Colletotrichum abundance ................................. 69 3.4.2 Fungal community comparison: High versus low anthracnose incidence ..... 70 3.4.3 Contribution of different drivers for fungal community shaping ................... 75 3.4.4 OTUs associated with each olive orchard and plant organ ...........................
Recommended publications
  • Chorioactidaceae: a New Family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with Four Genera

    Chorioactidaceae: a New Family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with Four Genera

    mycological research 112 (2008) 513–527 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Chorioactidaceae: a new family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with four genera Donald H. PFISTER*, Caroline SLATER, Karen HANSENy Harvard University Herbaria – Farlow Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular phylogenetic and comparative morphological studies provide evidence for the Received 15 June 2007 recognition of a new family, Chorioactidaceae, in the Pezizales. Four genera are placed in Received in revised form the family: Chorioactis, Desmazierella, Neournula, and Wolfina. Based on parsimony, like- 1 November 2007 lihood, and Bayesian analyses of LSU, SSU, and RPB2 sequence data, Chorioactidaceae repre- Accepted 29 November 2007 sents a sister clade to the Sarcosomataceae, to which some of these taxa were previously Corresponding Editor: referred. Morphologically these genera are similar in pigmentation, excipular construction, H. Thorsten Lumbsch and asci, which mostly have terminal opercula and rounded, sometimes forked, bases without croziers. Ascospores have cyanophilic walls or cyanophilic surface ornamentation Keywords: in the form of ridges or warts. So far as is known the ascospores and the cells of the LSU paraphyses of all species are multinucleate. The six species recognized in these four genera RPB2 all have limited geographical distributions in the northern hemisphere. Sarcoscyphaceae ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Sarcosomataceae SSU Introduction indicated a relationship of these taxa to the Sarcosomataceae and discussed the group as the Chorioactis clade. Only six spe- The Pezizales, operculate cup-fungi, have been put on rela- cies are assigned to these genera, most of which are infre- tively stable phylogenetic footing as summarized by Hansen quently collected.
  • Livro-Inpp.Pdf

    Livro-Inpp.Pdf

    GOVERNMENT OF BRAZIL President of Republic Michel Miguel Elias Temer Lulia Minister for Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications Gilberto Kassab MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI Director Nilson Gabas Júnior Research and Postgraduate Coordinator Ana Vilacy Moreira Galucio Communication and Extension Coordinator Maria Emilia Cruz Sales Coordinator of the National Research Institute of the Pantanal Maria de Lourdes Pinheiro Ruivo EDITORIAL BOARD Adriano Costa Quaresma (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia) Carlos Ernesto G.Reynaud Schaefer (Universidade Federal de Viçosa) Fernando Zagury Vaz-de-Mello (Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso) Gilvan Ferreira da Silva (Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental) Spartaco Astolfi Filho (Universidade Federal do Amazonas) Victor Hugo Pereira Moutinho (Universidade Federal do Oeste Paraense) Wolfgang Johannes Junk (Max Planck Institutes) Coleção Adolpho Ducke Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Natural resources in wetlands: from Pantanal to Amazonia Marcos Antônio Soares Mário Augusto Gonçalves Jardim Editors Belém 2017 Editorial Project Iraneide Silva Editorial Production Iraneide Silva Angela Botelho Graphic Design and Electronic Publishing Andréa Pinheiro Photos Marcos Antônio Soares Review Iraneide Silva Marcos Antônio Soares Mário Augusto G.Jardim Print Graphic Santa Marta Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Natural resources in wetlands: from Pantanal to Amazonia / Marcos Antonio Soares, Mário Augusto Gonçalves Jardim. organizers. Belém : MPEG, 2017. 288 p.: il. (Coleção Adolpho Ducke) ISBN 978-85-61377-93-9 1. Natural resources – Brazil - Pantanal. 2. Amazonia. I. Soares, Marcos Antonio. II. Jardim, Mário Augusto Gonçalves. CDD 333.72098115 © Copyright por/by Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, 2017. Todos os direitos reservados. A reprodução não autorizada desta publicação, no todo ou em parte, constitui violação dos direitos autorais (Lei nº 9.610).
  • AR TICLE Recommended Names for Pleomorphic Genera In

    AR TICLE Recommended Names for Pleomorphic Genera In

    IMA FUNGUS · 6(2): 507–523 (2015) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.14 Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes ARTICLE Amy Y. Rossman1, Pedro W. Crous2,3, Kevin D. Hyde4,5, David L. Hawksworth6,7,8, André Aptroot9, Jose L. Bezerra10, Jayarama D. Bhat11, Eric Boehm12, Uwe Braun13, Saranyaphat Boonmee4,5, Erio Camporesi14, Putarak Chomnunti4,5, Dong-Qin Dai4,5, Melvina J. D’souza4,5, Asha Dissanayake4,5,15, E.B. Gareth Jones16, Johannes Z. Groenewald2, Margarita Hernández-Restrepo2,3, Sinang Hongsanan4,5, Walter M. Jaklitsch17, Ruvishika Jayawardena4,5,12, Li Wen Jing4,5, Paul M. Kirk18, James D. Lawrey19, Ausana Mapook4,5, Eric H.C. McKenzie20, Jutamart Monkai4,5, Alan J.L. Phillips21, Rungtiwa Phookamsak4,5, Huzefa A. Raja22, Keith A. Seifert23, Indunil Senanayake4,5, Bernard Slippers3, Satinee Suetrong24, Kazuaki Tanaka25, Joanne E. Taylor26, Kasun M. Thambugala4,5,27, Qing Tian4,5, Saowaluck Tibpromma4,5, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe4,5,12, Nalin N. Wijayawardene4,5, Saowanee Wikee4,5, Joyce H.C. Woudenberg2, Hai-Xia Wu28,29, Jiye Yan12, Tao Yang2,30, Ying Zhang31 1Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA; corresponding author e-mail: amydianer@ yahoo.com 2CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 3Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa 4Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, School of Science, Mae Fah
  • Ass. Prof. Ahmed M. Abdel-Azeem Notes

    Ass. Prof. Ahmed M. Abdel-Azeem Notes

    The First International Conference of Arab Society for Fungal Conservation & Suez Canal University "Fungal Conservation in the Middle East and North of Africa" Under the auspices of; - President of Suez Canal University Prof. Mamdouh M. Ghorab - Dean of the Faculty of Science Prof. Al-Araby H. Shendy - Conference Chairman Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda - ASFC President Ass. Prof. Ahmed M. Abdel-Azeem Notes ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page_2 ASFC ICFC-2016 EGYPT The First International Conference on Fungal Conservation in the Middle East and North of Africa Theme of Conference: Bioprospecting vs. Conservation Conference Booklet 18-20 October 2016 Ismailia, Egypt Page_3 ©ASFC, 2016 ©Microbial Biosystems Journal (MBJ) Print ISSN (2357-0326) II Online ISSN (2357-0334) NON-COMMERCIAL REPRODUCTION Information in this booklet has been produced with the intent that it be readily available for personal and public non-commercial use and may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from Arab Society for Fungal Conservation. We ask only that: - Users exercise due diligence in ensuring
  • Kavaka Title Curve-44.Cdr

    Kavaka Title Curve-44.Cdr

    VOL 44 2015 MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA President PROF. B. N. JOHRI Past President PROF. T. SATYANARAYANA Vice President DR. M.V. DESHPANDE Secretary PROF. N. RAAMAN Treasurer PROF. M. SUDHAKARA REDDY Editor PROF. N.S. ATRI Editorial Board PROF. NILS HALLEMBERG, PROF. URMAS KOLJALG, PROF. B.P.R. VITTAL, PROF. ASHOK CHAVAN, PROF. S. MOHAN, KARUPPAYIL, PROF. M. CHANDRASEKARAN, PROF. K. MANJUNATH, DR. S.K. DESHMUKH, DR. R.C. UPADHYAY, PROF. SARITA W. NAZARETH, DR. M.V. DESHPANDE, DR. MUNRUCHI KAUR Members of Council PROF. N.K. DUBEY, DR. SAJAL SAJU DEO, DR. RUPAM KAPOOR, PROF. YASHPAL SHARMA, DR. AVNEET PAL SINGH, DR. SANJAY K. SINGH, DR. CHINTHALA PARAMAGEETHAM, DR. K.B. PURUSHOTHAMA, DR. K. SAMBANDAN, DR. SATISH KUMAR VERMA The Mycological Society of India was founded in January 1973 with a view to bring together the mycologists of the country and with the broad objective of promoting the development of Mycology in India in all its aspects and in the widest perspective. Memebership is open to all interested in mycology. The Life Member subscription is Rs. 3000+50/- in India and £100 or US$ 200 for those in abroad. The annual member subscription is Rs. 500+50/- in India and £20 or US $ 40 for those in abroad. Subscriptions are to be sent to the Treasurer,Prof. M. Sudhakara Reddy, Department of Biotechnology, Thaper University, Patiala-147004, Punjab, India (Email: [email protected] ). All general correspondence should be addressed toProf. N.Raaman, Secretary, MSI, C.A.S. in Botany, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai-600 025, India(Email: [email protected] ).
  • Pezizales), a New Species from the Patagonian Region of Argentina

    Pezizales), a New Species from the Patagonian Region of Argentina

    Pseudotricharina lanigera (Pezizales), a new species from the Patagonian region of Argentina Rosanne HEALY Abstract: A species of Pseudotricharina, similar in sequence and morphology to the type species P. intermedia, Donald H. PFISTER is described from a soil bank in a Nothofagus forest of the Andes Mountains of Argentina. This is only the se- Alija B. MUJIC cond species of Pseudotricharina to be described and the first known from the Southern Hemisphere. Daniela TORRES Keywords: Ascomycota, cup fungus, phylogeny, Pyronemataceae, taxonomy. Eduardo NOUHRA Resumen: Una nueva especie de Pseudotricharina se descripta para la región Andina de Argentina creciendo Guiliana FURCI en suelo expuesto en bosques de Nothofagus. Esta especie posee morfología y secuencia de ITS similares a Matthew E. SMITH la especie tipo P. intermedia y constituye la segunda especie de Pseudotricharina descrita y la primera para el hemisferio sur. Ascomycete.org, 9 (4) : 135-138. Palabras clave: Ascomycota, discomycete, filogenia, Pyronemataceae, taxonomía. Juillet 2017 Mise en ligne le 19/07/2017 Introduction Results During recent studies of the fungi in Nothofagaceae forests of The ITS and LSU sequences of Pseudotricharina lanigera were in- South America our research group has been systematically collec- cluded in the phylogenetic analyses of VAN VOOREN et al. (2017, Fig. 1 ting fungi and obtaining ITS rDNA barcodes. This effort has signifi- and 2). The topologies of the ITS and LSU RAxML trees clearly show cantly increased available sequence data from Patagonia and also the placement of this new species in the Pseudotricharina clade. The raised awareness of new species in the region (TRUONG et al., 2017).
  • Stemphylium Revisited

    Stemphylium Revisited

    available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 87: 77–103 (2017). Stemphylium revisited J.H.C. Woudenberg1, B. Hanse2, G.C.M. van Leeuwen3, J.Z. Groenewald1, and P.W. Crous1,4,5* 1Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2IRS, P.O. Box 32, 4600 AA Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands; 3National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO-NL), P.O. Box 9102, 6700 HC, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 4Wageningen University, Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; 5Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa *Correspondence: P.W. Crous, [email protected] Abstract: In 2007 a new Stemphylium leaf spot disease of Beta vulgaris (sugar beet) spread through the Netherlands. Attempts to identify this destructive Stemphylium sp. in sugar beet led to a phylogenetic revision of the genus. The name Stemphylium has been recommended for use over that of its sexual morph, Pleospora, which is polyphyletic. Stemphylium forms a well-defined monophyletic genus in the Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes), but lacks an up-to-date phylogeny. To address this issue, the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 and intervening 5.8S nr DNA (ITS) of all available Stemphylium and Pleospora isolates from the CBS culture collection of the Westerdijk Institute (N = 418), and from 23 freshly collected isolates obtained from sugar beet and related hosts, were sequenced to construct an overview phylogeny (N = 350). Based on their phylogenetic informativeness, parts of the protein-coding genes calmodulin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydro- genase were also sequenced for a subset of isolates (N = 149).
  • Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two

    Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two

    (topsheet) Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113. Fieldiana, Botany H. Thorsten Lumbsch Dept. of Botany Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr. Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 665-7881 fax: 312-665-7158 e-mail: [email protected] Sabine M. Huhndorf Dept. of Botany Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr. Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 665-7855 fax: 312-665-7158 e-mail: [email protected] 1 (cover page) FIELDIANA Botany NEW SERIES NO 00 Myconet Volume 14 Part One. Outine of Ascomycota – 2009 Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113 H. Thorsten Lumbsch Sabine M. Huhndorf [Date] Publication 0000 PUBLISHED BY THE FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 2 Table of Contents Abstract Part One. Outline of Ascomycota - 2009 Introduction Literature Cited Index to Ascomycota Subphylum Taphrinomycotina Class Neolectomycetes Class Pneumocystidomycetes Class Schizosaccharomycetes Class Taphrinomycetes Subphylum Saccharomycotina Class Saccharomycetes Subphylum Pezizomycotina Class Arthoniomycetes Class Dothideomycetes Subclass Dothideomycetidae Subclass Pleosporomycetidae Dothideomycetes incertae sedis: orders, families, genera Class Eurotiomycetes Subclass Chaetothyriomycetidae Subclass Eurotiomycetidae Subclass Mycocaliciomycetidae Class Geoglossomycetes Class Laboulbeniomycetes Class Lecanoromycetes Subclass Acarosporomycetidae Subclass Lecanoromycetidae Subclass Ostropomycetidae 3 Lecanoromycetes incertae sedis: orders, genera Class Leotiomycetes Leotiomycetes incertae sedis: families, genera Class Lichinomycetes Class Orbiliomycetes Class Pezizomycetes Class Sordariomycetes Subclass Hypocreomycetidae Subclass Sordariomycetidae Subclass Xylariomycetidae Sordariomycetes incertae sedis: orders, families, genera Pezizomycotina incertae sedis: orders, families Part Two. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751 – 5113 Introduction Literature Cited 4 Abstract Part One presents the current classification that includes all accepted genera and higher taxa above the generic level in the phylum Ascomycota.
  • Hoffmannoscypha, a Novel Genus of Brightly Coloured, Cupulate Pyronemataceae Closely Related to Tricharina and Geopora

    Hoffmannoscypha, a Novel Genus of Brightly Coloured, Cupulate Pyronemataceae Closely Related to Tricharina and Geopora

    Mycol Progress DOI 10.1007/s11557-012-0875-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hoffmannoscypha, a novel genus of brightly coloured, cupulate Pyronemataceae closely related to Tricharina and Geopora Benjamin Stielow & Gunnar Hensel & Dirk Strobelt & Huxley Mae Makonde & Manfred Rohde & Jan Dijksterhuis & Hans-Peter Klenk & Markus Göker Received: 7 July 2012 /Revised: 11 November 2012 /Accepted: 25 November 2012 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 Abstract The rare apothecial, cupulate fungus Geopora comprising Phaeangium, Picoa, the majority of the pellita (Pyronemataceae) is characterized by a uniquely Tricharina species, and the remaining Geopora species. bright yellow-orange excipulum. We here re-examine its Based on its phylogenetic position and its unique combina- affiliations by use of morphological, molecular phylogenetic tion of morphological characters, we assign G. pellita to and ultrastructural analyses. G. pellita appears as phyloge- Hoffmannoscypha, gen. nov., as H. pellita, comb. nov. As in netically rather isolated, being the sister group of a clade a previous study, analyses of both large subunit (LSU) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA suggest that the remaining genus Geopora is paraphyletic, with the Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article hypogeous, ptychothecial type species more closely related (doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0875-1) contains supplementary material, to Picoa and Phaeangium than to the greyish-brownish which is available to authorized users. cupulate and apothecial Geopora spp., indicating that the : B. Stielow J. Dijksterhuis latter should be reassigned to the genus Sepultaria. The Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, current study also shows that ITS confirm LSU data regard- Uppsalalaan 8, ing the polyphyly of Tricharina.
  • 2 Pezizomycotina: Pezizomycetes, Orbiliomycetes

    2 Pezizomycotina: Pezizomycetes, Orbiliomycetes

    2 Pezizomycotina: Pezizomycetes, Orbiliomycetes 1 DONALD H. PFISTER CONTENTS 5. Discinaceae . 47 6. Glaziellaceae. 47 I. Introduction ................................ 35 7. Helvellaceae . 47 II. Orbiliomycetes: An Overview.............. 37 8. Karstenellaceae. 47 III. Occurrence and Distribution .............. 37 9. Morchellaceae . 47 A. Species Trapping Nematodes 10. Pezizaceae . 48 and Other Invertebrates................. 38 11. Pyronemataceae. 48 B. Saprobic Species . ................. 38 12. Rhizinaceae . 49 IV. Morphological Features .................... 38 13. Sarcoscyphaceae . 49 A. Ascomata . ........................... 38 14. Sarcosomataceae. 49 B. Asci. ..................................... 39 15. Tuberaceae . 49 C. Ascospores . ........................... 39 XIII. Growth in Culture .......................... 50 D. Paraphyses. ........................... 39 XIV. Conclusion .................................. 50 E. Septal Structures . ................. 40 References. ............................. 50 F. Nuclear Division . ................. 40 G. Anamorphic States . ................. 40 V. Reproduction ............................... 41 VI. History of Classification and Current I. Introduction Hypotheses.................................. 41 VII. Growth in Culture .......................... 41 VIII. Pezizomycetes: An Overview............... 41 Members of two classes, Orbiliomycetes and IX. Occurrence and Distribution .............. 41 Pezizomycetes, of Pezizomycotina are consis- A. Parasitic Species . ................. 42 tently shown
  • Endophytes in Maize (Zea Mays) in New Zealand

    Endophytes in Maize (Zea Mays) in New Zealand

    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Endophytes in Maize (Zea mays) in New Zealand A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at Lincoln University by Jennifer Joy Brookes Lincoln University 2017 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science. Abstract Endophytes in Maize (Zea mays) in New Zealand by Jennifer Joy Brookes The aim of this study was to isolate fungal endophytes from maize in New Zealand (NZ) and to select endophytes with potential to reduce insect pests and/or plant diseases. Culture methods were used to isolate 322 isolates of fungi belonging to four phyla from maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Plants were sampled over two growing seasons (2014 and 2015) in two regions of NZ. Morphological and molecular (ITS rDNA sequencing) techniques were used to identify the fungi. The most common genera recovered were Fusarium, followed by Alternaria, Trichoderma, Epicoccum, Mucor, Penicillium and Cladosoprium spp. Of the Acomycota isolates, 33 genera from 6 classes were recovered.
  • Metabolite Production by Species of Stemphylium

    Metabolite Production by Species of Stemphylium

    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 28, 2021 Metabolite production by species of Stemphylium Olsen, Kresten Jon Kromphardt; Rossman, Amy; Andersen, Birgitte Published in: Fungal Biology Link to article, DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.12.012 Publication date: 2018 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olsen, K. J. K., Rossman, A., & Andersen, B. (2018). Metabolite production by species of Stemphylium. Fungal Biology, 122(2-3), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2017.12.012 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Accepted Manuscript Metabolite production by species of Stemphylium Kresten Jon Kromphardt Olsen, Amy Rossman, Birgitte Andersen PII: S1878-6146(18)30001-1 DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.12.012 Reference: FUNBIO 885 To appear in: Fungal Biology Received Date: 14 November 2017 Revised Date: 18 December 2017 Accepted Date: 21 December 2017 Please cite this article as: Kromphardt Olsen, K.J., Rossman, A., Andersen, B., Metabolite production by species of Stemphylium, Fungal Biology (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.12.012.