Programme Eng.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Programme Eng.Pdf September 18, 2019 08:30–10:00 OPENING OF THE FORUM. EXHIBITION TOUR 10:00–11:30 MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP OF THE STATE Conference hall No. 1 COUNCIL UNDER THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “SCIENCE AND EDUCATION” Government of the Novosibirsk Region Ensuring that the Russian Federation is one the five leading countries in the world engaged in research and development in fields defined by the priorities of scientific and technological development. Ensuring that working in the Russian Federation is attractive to Russian and foreign leading scientists and young promising researchers. Outstripping increase in domestic expenditures for research and development from all sources compared to the growth of the country’s gross domestic product. Moderator: Andrey Travnikov, Governor of the Novosibirsk Region, leader of the Working Group of the State Council of the Russian Federation for Science and Education Panelists: Experts of the Working Group of the State Council of the Russian Federation for Science and Education 10:00–11:30 Strategical session Conference hall No. 2 BIOINFORMATICS, GENETIC TECHNOLOGY CENTERS AND GENOME RESEARCH CENTERS FRC ICG SB RAS Discussion topics: NSU Genetics and mathematics: large-scale genetic data and Ministry of Science of the their analysis – current trends and prospects. Novosibirsk Region Genetics and agricultural technologies. Genetics and industrial biotechnologies. Moderators: Aleksey Kochetov, Director of FRC ICG SB RAS Pyotr Kutsenogiy, Deputy Director for Innovations of FRC ICG SB RAS Speakers: Denis Astafyev, Director of RTCloud Novosibirsk Sergey Goncharov, RAS Academician, Director of IM SB RAS Yelena Hlyostkina, Acting Director of Federal Research Center N. I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources Aleksandr Kilchevskiy, Deputy Chairman of Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Nikolay Kolchanov, Academic Director of ICG SB RAS Roman Kulikov, Head of Section of the Skolkovo Foundation Pyotr Kutsenogiy, Deputy Director for Innovations of ICG of SB RAS Dmitry Sviridenko, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences of IM of SB RAS Dmitriy Novikov, Director of Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS Ruslan Sheyko, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Member of NAS of Belarus, Director of Institute of Genetics and Cytology NAS of Belarus Vadim Stepanov, Acting Director of Tomsk NRMC Aleksandr Yanenko, Director of National Research center Kurchatov Institute Yekaterina Zhuravleva, Sector Leader, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Nemchinovka Moscow Research and Development Institute of Agriculture Yuriy Zybarev, Advisor of the Director of ICG SB RAS 10:00–11:30 Russian-French Dialogue Conference hall No. 3 Panel discussion INDUSTRY OF THE FUTURE: DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AS ZYFRA A DRIVER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL Ministry of Industry and ENTERPRISES IN THE REGION Trade of the Novosibirsk Region, Foundation Nauka According to leading consulting companies, the aggregate Innov CCI France Russie economic effect from digitalization of the Russian industry Foreign Relations will amount up to RUB 2 tln. by 2025. Today, it is an Department of the important and major trend that has spread to many regions Executive Office of the of our country. Governor of the According to the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Novosibirsk Region and Russian Federation and Zyfra, more than 15 % of industrial the Government of the sector companies are ready for digitalization of their Novosibirsk Region production processes. The scientific and industrial potential of the Novosibirsk Region is one of the most important factors in the implementation of complex digital projects. Nonetheless, there is a number of problems associated with the existence of many different automation systems, human resource problems, lack of a coherent strategy, etc. There are many “end-to-end” digital solutions aimed at digitalization of not only individual enterprises in oil and gas, mining, chemical, mechanical engineering industries, but also at entire value chains. They are already being actively used in industry, but the potential is still huge. Russian Government has launched the “Digital Economy” national program and implements the “Digital Technologies” federal project within this program. The goal is simple – helping enterprises with pilot implementations of digital products and supporting their upscaling. Industry is considered in this context as the main beneficiary. However, it should be noted that the application of breakthrough digital technologies is always accompanied by a lot of risks and uncertainties, therefore it is important to develop and adhere to the strategy. Discussion topics: Overview of the industry digitalization level. What is the reason for digitalization? The best cases and effects – by industries: mining, oil and gas, mechanical engineering, chemistry. State support for digital transformation (Road maps, subsidies) how to get funds? How can digitalization of industry help the region? French experience for the transition to the industry of the future. Moderator: Pavel Fedosov, Strategic Development Manager of Cifra Speakers: Aleksey Borovkov, Vice-Rector of St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Adrien Danière, President of Nauka Innov CCI France Russie Anton Kudinov, Technical Director of Rubius Andrey Kuzyaev, President of Er-Telecom Aleksandr Smolensky, Deputy Director General, Director of Artificial Intelligence Application Department of Cifra 10:00–11:30 Congress Conference hall No. 4 Future breakthrough area. 1ST ALL-RUSSIAN CONGRESS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF Ministry of Science of the PREFERENTIAL AREAS. Novosibirsk Region PART 1: SCIENCE CITIES, INNOVATION CLUSTERS, HIGH Ministry of Industry and TECH VALLEYS, RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERS Trade of the Novosibirsk Region Discussion topics: Minister of Economic Creation of preferential areas such as a science city, a Development of the high-tech valley, an innovation cluster, an international Novosibirsk Region medical cluster, a distributed intercollegiate campus, a SB RAS scientific and educational center (REC). Regional Office of All- Requirements for the areas, administration, membership, Russian Non- tax and administrative preferences. Governmental Administration system of preferential areas such as a Organization of Small and science city, a high-tech valley, an innovation cluster, an Medium Business Opora international cluster, a distributed intercollegiate Russia campus, REC. The first experience of creation and provisional performance of preferential areas such as a high-tech valley, an innovative cluster, an international cluster, a distributed intercollegiate campus, REC. The role of the state and legislative initiatives for the development of science cities, high-tech valleys, innovation clusters, international clusters, distributed intercollegiate campuses, RECs. The role and place of preferential areas in regional and state policy and economy. Cases of representatives of preferential areas for the development of territories and relations with residents. Mutual integration and organization of interaction between science cities, high-tech valleys, innovation clusters, international clusters, distributed intercollegiate campuses, RECs, including interaction with other types of preferential areas. Moderator: Vladimir Ivanov, Deputy President of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of NRNU MEPhI and RANEPA, Chairman of the Editorial Board of the Innovations Magazine Speakers: Sergey Artemov, leading expert of Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge of the Russian Cluster Observatory Center, NRU HSE Alexey Komissarov, Cochairman of the Central Staff of the All-Russia People’s Front, General Director of ANCO Russia – the Country of Opportunities, Director of the Higher School of Public Administration RANEPA Mikhail Kotyukov, Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Mikhail Kuznetsov, Director of the Russian Science Cities Development Union Dmitriy Markovich,Chief Scientific Secretary of SB RAS Vadim Medvedev, Director of Innovations and Advanced Studies Department of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Artyom Shadrin, Director of Strategic Development and Innovation Department, Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Ruslan Shagaleyev, Head of Innopolis Municipality Victor Sidnev, First Deputy Head of the Department of Science, Industrial Policy and Entrepreneurship of Moscow, supervising the creation of the Moscow Innovation Cluster Foundation, President of the Russian Science Cities Development Union Mikhail Yugai, Director General of IMC Skolkovo Vadim Zhivulin, Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation 10:00–11:30 Siberian Venture Fair (SVF) Conference hall No. 5 Straight talk REGIONAL INVESTMENTS: COMPETITION BETWEEN RVCA ECOSYSTEMS Infrastructural partner Discussion topics: Competition between regional ecosystems. Key factors defining the effectiveness of a regional ecosystem in terms of the ability to ensure the flow of venture capital transactions. How to create a strategic planning system for the development of a balanced ecosystem and achievement of synergy in the operation of development institutions, business and science. Panelists: Existing investors of institutional and informal sectors of the venture capital market, representatives of federal development institutions, experts in the field of technological
Recommended publications
  • Russi-Monitor-Monthl
    MONTHLY May 2020 CONTENTS 3 17 28 POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN BELARUS RAMPS UP RUSSIAN ECONOMY COMES CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS BADLY BECAUSE OF PANDEMIC PIPE PROJECT TO CHALLENGE WITH U.S. AND GULF CRUDE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE PURCHASES POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC PIPE PROJECT CORONAVIRUS IN RUSSIA: BAD NEWS FOR 3 TO CHALLENGE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE 20 THE COUNTRY MOSCOW: THE CAPITAL RUSSIA UNVEILS RESCUE PLAN FOR OIL 5 OF RUSSIAN CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK 22 SECTOR VLADIMIR PUTIN SUFFERS PRESTIGIOUS 6 FAILURE IN VICTORY DAY CELEBRATIONS 23 TENSIONS RISE IN THE BLACK SEA RUSSIA EASES LOCKDOWN YET OFFERS ROSNEFT, TRANSNEFT IN NEW FEUD OVER 8 LITTLE SUPPORT TO CITIZENS 25 TRANSPORTATION TARIFFS ROSNEFT’S SECHIN ASKS OFFICIALS FOR NEW TAX RELIEFS DESPITE RECENT GAZPROM IS TURNING TOWARDS CHINA, 10 MISHAPS 27 BUT THERE ARE PROBLEMS FRADKOV REMAINS AT THE HELM OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY COMES BADLY 12 KREMLIN’S “INTELLIGENCE SERVICE” 28 BECAUSE OF PANDEMIC RUSSIA STEPS UP DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS AS RUSSIA AIMS TO BOOST MILITARY FACILITIES 14 KREMLIN AIDE KOZAK VISITS BERLIN 30 IN SYRIA GAZPROM’S NATURAL GAS EXPORT RUSSIA–NATO TENSIONS CONTINUE ON 16 REVENUE DECLINED DRAMATICALLY IN Q1 32 BOTH FLANKS BELARUS RAMPS UP DIVERSIFICATION RUSSIA, BELARUS SQUABBLE OVER GAS EFFORTS WITH U.S. AND GULF CRUDE DELIVERIES IN NEW CHAPTER OF ENERGY 17 PURCHASES 34 WAR RUSSIA’S ROSNEFT HAS NEW OWNERSHIP RUSSIA FACES BIGGEST MILITARY THREAT 19 STRUCTURE BUT SAME CEO 36 FROM WEST, SHOIGU SAYS 2 www.warsawinstitute.org 4 May 2020 POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC PIPE PROJECT TO CHALLENGE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE Construction of a major gas pipeline from Norway is to begin in the coming days, Polish President Andrzej Duda said in the morning of May 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Identifying Russia's Elite Groups
    Defining and identifying Russia’s elite groups Siloviki representation during Putin’s third term Master’s Thesis Russian and Eurasian Studies Leiden University, The Netherlands 23 January 2017 Sam Broekman Student Number: 1605062 Word Count: 18,005 Supervisor: Dr. M. Frear Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introducing the siloviki ......................................................................................................................... 2 General research gaps ......................................................................................................................... 2 Research question ............................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................. 4 Section 1: Rise of the siloviki..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 The Politburo 2.0 ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Putin’s return to the presidency .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Power in Putin's Third Term: Was Crimea A
    www.ssoar.info Presidential Power in Putin’s Third Term: Was Crimea a Critical Juncture in Domestic Politics? Burkhardt, Fabian Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Burkhardt, F. (2017). Presidential Power in Putin’s Third Term: Was Crimea a Critical Juncture in Domestic Politics? In F. Burkhardt, A. Barbashin, O. Irisova, & E. Wyciszkiewicz (Eds.), A Successful Failure: Russia after Crime(a) (pp. 119-141). Warschau: Centre for Polish-Russian Dialogue and Understanding. https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54439-5 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • MRO Russia and CIS 14Th International Conference & Exhibition March 5-6, 2019, Moscow, World Trade Center
    MRO Russia and CIS 14th international conference & exhibition March 5-6, 2019, Moscow, World Trade Center List of participants Company Name Position 1st Choice Aerospace Gokhan Sen Regional Sales Manager 218 ARZ Maksim Ishchenko Deputy Managing Director for Sales and Service 218 ARZ Vlad Krendelev Project Manager AAR Corporation Andre op`t Hof Director of Commercial Operations MRO Services AAR Corporation Anna Marian Regional Director, Eastern Europe, Russia & CIS AAR Corporation Paul Richardson Vice President of Sales EMEA ACS Logistics Company Pavel Fedorov Logistics Manager ACS Logistics Company Yurii Turovets Director AEM Ametek MRO Linares Ricardo tbc AEM Ametek MRO Sandy Basu Technical Sales Manager AerCap Niels van Antwerpen Vice President Leasing Aereos - Atlas Aerospace Alexey Dmitriev Sales Engineer Aereos - Atlas Aerospace David Baker Partner Aereos - Atlas Aerospace Haim Gettler VP of Sales AerFin Loreta Durell Senior Account Manager AerFin Scott Kelsey Regional Sales Director Aero Future Alexey Fisenko CEO Aero Norway AS Glenford Marston General Manager Aero Norway AS Sena Iyipilavci Sales Manager Aero Shop Elena Belova Bose Aviation Product Manager Head of Spare Parts Supply Quality Assurance Aeroflot Alexander Avramenko Division Aeroflot Amirdin Shamiev Aircraft Mechanic Chief of the MIS Department (MRO IT) Aeroflot Andrey Denisov Department of Information Systems Chief Specialist of the Corporate Insurance Aeroflot Andrey Sokolov Division, Corporate Finance Department Head of Projects, Continuing Airworthiness Aeroflot
    [Show full text]
  • Kesarev Memo | New Russian Government | January 2020
    Kesarev phone: +32 (2) 899 4699 e-mail: [email protected] www.kesarev.com NEW RUSSIAN CABINET: STAFF “REVOLUTION” INSTEAD OF STRUCTURAL REFORMS? Summary On January 21, 2020, President Putin approved the structure of the new Russian Government and appointed Deputy Prime Ministers and federal Ministers. New Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin was appointed on January 16. What are the key specifics of the new Cabinet? The key specific feature of the new Russian Cabinet is that while the structural changes are minimal, the staff reshuffles proved to be radical, both in terms of the number of new people appointed to top offices and change of political status of key Cabinet members (how close they are to the President). This is an extremely atypical decision for Putin, compared to previous Cabinets over the entire period of his stay in power. Earlier, as a rule, the Cabinets included influential figures close to the President and personally associated with him, and a system of checks and balances between different elite groups existed. But at the same time, the decision to change the approach to the Cabinet appointments is logical in the context of a broader presidential “staff policy” over recent years - the so-called “technocratisation” of power (the appointment of young “technocratic” governors, the penetration of such figures into Medvedev’s second Cabinet, the appointment of the head of the Presidential Administration, a “technocrat” Anton Vayno during the Parliamentary election campaign in 2016 and the launch of “Leaders of Russia” contest in order to select and train a “succession pool” for the top positions in the federal and regional civil bureaucracy).
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in (Insert Country Name Here)
    Doing Business in Russia: 2013 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services 1 6/19/2013 Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy • Market Fact Sheet Link Market Overview Return to top • With a vast landmass, extensive natural resources, more than 140 million consumers, a growing middle class, and almost unlimited infrastructure needs, Russia remains one of the most promising and exciting markets for U.S. exporters. • Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and 7th largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). It has the highest per capita GDP ($13,400) of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Russia is an upper middle income country, with a highly educated and trained workforce and sophisticated, discerning consumers. • Russia’s economy is still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with GDP growth estimated at 2.8% for 2013. • In terms of trade in goods, Russia was the United States’ 27th largest export market and the 16th largest exporter to the United States in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Direct Investment Fund
    RUSSIAN DIRECT INVESTMENT FUND Sovereign Investment Workshop In Quest for Stability: The Global Governance of Sovereign Wealth Funds June 27th 2014 Florence, Italy THE RUSSIAN DIRECT INVESTMENT FUND (RDIF): SNAPSHOT . RDIF was created in 2011 under the leadership of both the President and the Prime Minister of Russia • To carry out profitable investments • To invest alongside top global investors, side‐by‐side on same terms • To act as a catalyst for foreign direct investment in Russia • To provide support and alignment of interests with foreign investors • RDIF management company is a 100% subsidiary of Vnesheconombank (VEB), Russia’s state development bank . $10bn private equity fund established by the Russian government • Making equity co‐investments primarily in the Russian economy • Acting as a best‐in‐class local partner with full execution and portfolio management capabilities in Russia . Investment themes • Focus on market leaders • Growing middle class • Import substitution • Sectors where Russia has sustainable competitive advantage • Significant opportunities and growing demand for new infrastructure • Opportunities to radically increase efficiency of Russian producers . RDIF and its partners have invested $3.8bn into leading Russian companies • Over $900mm were invested by RDIF and $2.9bn came from foreign co‐investors • Implementing international best practices of investment discipline, transparency and corporate governance . RDIF has attracted more than $12bn of foreign long‐term capital to Russia through strategic partnerships 2 RDIF GOVERNANCE: STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT BODIES International Key development and international Auditor audit trade bank, chaired 100% sole by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev International Advisory ownership investor advice Board CEMF Management RDIF Agreement Russian Direct Investment Fund MANAGEMENT COMPANY (RDIF) Three levels of governance: Stakes I.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT Vladimir Putin's Big Government and the “Politburo 2.0”
    REPORT Vladimir Putin’s Big Government and the “Politburo 2.0” Minchenko Consulting Communication Group presents the report “Vladimir Putin’s Big Government and the Politburo 2.0”, which is based on the results of an expert survey of more than 60 participants (representatives of the country’s political and business elites). Due to the specific nature of the survey, subject participation was strictly anonymous. The purpose of the survey was to build a consistent model of the informal decision-making system formed following the electoral cycle of 2011-2012, and of making staff decisions concerning the appointment of the new line-up in the Russian Government and the Presidential Executive Office. The report is intended for regional elites, Russian business and foreign investors. The formation of a new executive structure (including the government, the Presidential Executive Office, rotation in the governors’ offices) demonstrated us a new staffing style of Vladimir Putin. The traditional scheme of the “checks and balances” elite system was sophisticated: - A “control unit” that is in fact a back-up structure to the government was created within the Presidential Executive Office; it is represented by assistants to the President and specific administrations controlled by them. It should be noted that thanks to their staff these administrations can compete with ministries and governmental departments on the speed of bureaucratic procedures. There also exist recruitment centers alternative to the Presidential Executive Office [hereinafter – the PEO]. For example, Vladislav Surkov’s team that moved into the government; for now it is forced away from managing the domestic policy but, when necessary, it is ready to resume performing this function; - The President set up a number of new commissions (specifically, commissions for energy and for monitoring the execution of the President’s pre-election promises), which comprise of both ministers and representatives of the PEO.
    [Show full text]
  • Rbguide En 01-2020 Web.Pdf
    Lilia Nazarova: Respect and honesty as business foundation LLC LEKOPT General Director Lilia Nazarova told us about values and development goals of her company. ISTORY LEKOPT is a project implemented by a H team of like-minded professionals boasting years of experience in pharma- cology, pharmaceutics, and hospital care, a perfect distribution network, and a reliable reputation as a partner. LEKOPT set ambitious goals from the begin- ning and took a successful start in 2016. We have been trying to create comfortable working con- ditions, motivate for success, pay high salaries, and provide social benefits since day one. Continued on page 34 RUSSIAN BUSINESS GUIDE 1 2020 1 CONTENTS 4 | Business Chronicles RUSSIA AND THE WORLD 10 | New investment cycle begins 14 | Teresa Bellanova: Russian consumers appreciate Italian food quality 16 | Daria Pushkova: “Italians and we have similar values” 22 | Sergey Katyrin: Innovations and creative approach as key growth drivers IN THE LIMELIGHT 28 | Matthias Schepp: Russia still attractive to investors 10 RUSSIA – TERRITORY OF BUSINESS 32 | In the interests of business, for the benefit of Bashkortostan HEALTHCARE 1, 34 | Lilia Nazarova: Respect and honesty as business foundation TOURISM 36 | Spectrum – creative routes and unusual places EXIBITION 40 | CJF Child and Junior Fashion is your shortcut to the Russian market of children’s goods ITALY PRESENTS 40 44 | "Arctic Dimension" of Italy's modern policy CULTURE 48 | Pristine Russia and Unexpected Italy HISTORY 52 | Soviet soldiers under the sun of Italy
    [Show full text]
  • UNCLASSIFIED Report to Congress Pursuant To
    UNCLASSIFIED Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 241 of the Countering America's Adversaries Througb Sanctions Act of 2017 Regarding Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian Parastatal Entities January 29, 2018 Section 241 of the Countering America' s Adversaries Tbrough Sanctions Act of 2017 (САА TSA) requires the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, to submit to the appropriate congressional committees 180 days after enactment а detailed report оп senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation (Section 241 (a)(l )) and on Russian parastatal entities (Section 241 (а)(2)). Pursuant to Section 241(Ь), the report shall Ье submitted in an unclassified form but may have а classified annex. This is the unclassifi.ed portion of the report. Section 241(а)(1) - Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation As required Ьу Section 241 (a)( l)(A) of CAATSA, the Department ofthe Treasury is providing in this unclassified report а list of senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation, as determined Ьу their closeness to the Russian regime and their net worth. For purposes of this unclassified portion of the report, this determination was made based оп objective criteria related to individuals' official position in the case of senior political figures, or а net worth of $1 billion or more for oligarchs. То determine the list of senior political figures, the Department of the Treasury considered the definition in CAATSA Section 24 1 (с)(2) , which incorporates Ьу reference the definition of "senior foreign political figure" in section 1О10.605 , title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing the Composition of Russia's New Cabinet and Presidential
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING THE COMPOSITION OF RUSSIA’S NEW CABINET AND PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION, AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE Abstract The new Russian government represents a compromise between Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev. Although the latter had to step aside last September and relinquish the presidency, he was given more latitude to assemble the cabinet of ministers than in 2008. The new Russian power configuration following the recent reshuffle is more complex than it was previously. There are in fact now more centres of decision-making. The division of labour between the president and the prime minister will not necessarily correspond to the letter of the constitution. One of the key questions at the moment is the role that the president’s new aides and advisors will play. The emergence of a 'parallel cabinet' in the Kremlin would complicate the decision-making system and would leave Dmitry Medvedev in a weaker position. The situation in Moscow is rapidly changing. The authorities appear to be sending conflicting signals. While Dmitry Medvedev had made some concessions in December on the election of the governors and the registration of political parties, we note that in the last several weeks he has been tempted to backpedal. EP/EXPO/B/AFET/FWC/2009-01/Lot1/38 June 2012 PE 457.132 EN Policy Department DG External Policies This briefing was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs following a proposal by the Policy Department, DG EXPO. AUTHOR: Arnaud DUBIEN, Senior Research Fellow, IRIS, Belgium ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE: Julien CRAMPES Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department WIB 06 M 075 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Elina STERGATOU LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Editorial closing date: 13 June 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Science Publishers, Inc
    Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Art Director: Christopher Concannon Graphics: Elenor Kallberg and Maria Ester Hawrys Book Production: Michael Lyons, Roseann Pena, Casey Pfalzer, June Martino, Tammy Sauter, and Michelle Lalo Circulation: Irene Kwartiroff, Annette Hellinger, and Benjamin Fung Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data Vachnadze, Georgii Nikolaevich Russia’s hotbeds of tension / George N. Vachnadze p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1560721413: $59.00 1. Russia (Federation)—Ethnic relations. 2. RegionalismRussia (Federation). 3. Russia (Federation)Politics and government — 1991 I. Title. DK510.33.V33 1993 9321645 305.8’00947~dc20 CIP © 1994 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 6080 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 207 Commack, New York 11725 Tele. 5164993103 Fax 5164993146 EMail [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: elec tronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without permission from the publishers. Printed in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Russia to follow the path of the USSR 1 PART ONE REGIONS THREATEN MOSCOW WITH DIVORCE URALS. Nuclear Discharges in Kyshtym Equals 24 Chernobyl Accidents 13 SIBERIA. Petrodollars Prolonged the Agony of Communism for 30 Years 25 RUSSIAN NORTH. Genocide: From Stalinist Camps to Nuclear Dumps and Testing Ranges 50 FAR EAST. In One Boat with the Japanese, Koreans, Chinese and Americans 66 PART TWO REPUBLICS WITH LITTLE IN COMMON WITH ORTHODOX CHURCH LEGACY OF COMMUNISTS AND GOLDEN HORDE BASHKORTOSTAN. Overwhelming Catastrophes 77 BURYATIA. Buddhism Revived 84 CHUVASHIA. Famous Dark Beer 90 KARELIA. Ruined Part of Finland 91 KOMI.
    [Show full text]