DOCSLIB.ORG

Built Environment Meets Parliament’ Summit, Canberra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 of 8 FINANCE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE Agenda Item 6.3 REPORT 13 October 2009 COUNCILLOR CLARKE POST TRAVEL REPORT ‘BUILT ENVIRONMENT MEETS PARLIAMENT’ SUMMIT, CANBERRA Report by Councillor Peter Clarke Purpose 1. To report to the Finance and Governance Committee on the travel undertaken by Cr Peter Clarke to Canberra to participate in the ‘Built Environment Meets Parliament’ (BEMP) Summit, Parliament House, Canberra on 12 August 2009. Recommendation 2. That the Finance and Governance Committee note this report and the incorporated summary of benefits and outcomes. Background 3. Cr Clarke’s participation in the BEMP 09 Summit was approved by the Lord Mayor on 4 August in accordance with the Councillor Expenses and Resources Guidelines. Due to time constraints, the proposal was unable to be submitted to the Finance and Governance Committee as the next meeting of the Committee was scheduled for 11 August which was the day before the Summit. Key Issues Details of Travel 4. Cr Clarke attended the BEMP 2009 Summit on Wednesday 12 August. 5. The Summit was held in the Theatre, Parliament House, Canberra from 8.30am – 5pm. BEMP 2009 was attended by 200 delegates including architects, planners, engineers, developers, key government department representatives, ministers, shadow ministers, members of parliament and parliamentary advisors. 6. The annual BEMP Summit is co-hosted by the following organisations: 6.1. Association of Consulting Engineers, Australia; 6.2. Australian Institute of Architects; 6.3. Green Building Council of Australia; 6.4. The Planning Institute of Australia; and 6.5. Property Council of Australia. 7. A copy of the Summit program is included at Attachment 1. 2 of 8 Councillor Expenses and Resources Guidelines 8. The Manager Governance Services has confirmed that the travel undertaken accords with the requirements of the travel guidelines outlined in the Councillor Expenses and Resources Guidelines. Outcomes / Benefits 9. BEMP 2009 focused on four main policy areas addressing economic, environmental, social and governance issues and how the building sector, in partnership with government, can contribute to planning for sustainable communities and provide a strong foundation for future prosperity. The Summit titles and session outlines are summarised below: 9.1. Prosperity: This session explored ways to unlock credit; maintain and create jobs; and boost Australia’s productivity and competitiveness. 9.2. Sustainability: This session explored the significant contribution the building sector can make to reducing Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions through employing energy efficiency measures. 9.3. Liveability: This session explored the role of the built environment in improving health, housing and transport across our communities. 9.4. Partnership and Actions: This session explored opportunities to reduce regulatory barriers and to improve Australia’s planning, taxation and procurement practices. 10. The BEMP partner organisations commissioned a consultation draft document titled ‘Principles for Planning Sustainable Communities’ which aims to provide a model, principles-based framework about the shape and form that strategic plans for cities and our communities should take. 11. The key outcome of the Summit was to finalise a draft of national principles for a Model Planning Framework focusing on a sustainable built environment, with a view to consolidating the principles of the first draft, a copy of which is included as Attachment 2. 12. Summit organisers advised that an interactive website would be established to allow further input to the draft. Cost 13. The total cost to Council associated with Cr Clarke’s travel was $578.64 which included airfare and Summit registration fee. Attachments: 1. Summit Program 2. Model Planning Framework Principles 2 1055am - 11.50am Panel discussion 3 of 8 David Atkin, CEO, Cbus Don Henry, Executive Director, Australian Conservation Foundation John Connor, CEO, The Climate Institute Senator Christine Milne, Deputy Leader of the Australian Greens • The Hon Greg Hunt MP,4hadow Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water 11.50am - 1.00pm LIVEABILITY = UILT ENVIRONMENT MEETS PARLIAMENT This session will explore the role of the built environment in improving health, housing and transport across our communities. It will involve a discussion on pathways to creating healthy and affordable places and spaces, including transport-oriented development and integrated land use and infrastructure planning. 11.50am - 1155am Introduction Stephen Jonhston, CE6; Planning Institute of Australia 11.55am - 12.15pm Keynote speaker The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP, Minister for Housing; Minister for the Status of Women We are living through BEMP will provide you with the opportunity to ask questions and debate policy with 12.15pm - 1.00pm Panel discussion • unprecedented times, with global _ WELCOME Ministers, Senators, members of parliament Kerry Barwise, Director, the Allen Consulting Group economic uncertainty and threats to our natural environment, which and your colleagues in the sector. You will Brendan Gleeson, Director:Urban Research Program, Griffith University meet new people within the industry and TO BEMP creates significant challenges The Hon Bill Shorten MP, Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Children's Services; key government officials who are passionate for the building sector. We need Parliamentary Secretary for Victorian Bushfire Reconstruction 2009! about the built environment. Scott Morrison MP, Shadow Minister for Housing and Local Government both immediate and long term responses to advance Australia's 1.00pm - 2.00pm LUNCH The program has been designed to provide Healthy Spaces and Places Launch prosperity and quality of life and to you with an insight into the issues we need create a sustainable future. to tackle head-on, and the solutions that 2.00pm - 3.00pm PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES Peter Verwer, CEO, Property Council of Australia industry wants to work on with government. BEMP 2009 will focus on how the building 3.00pm - 3.30pm AFTERNOON TEA sector, in partnership with government You will be inspired by what you hear, 3.30pm - 4.30pm PARTN ERS H I PS AN Dc„ACTIONS can contribute to planning for sustainable see and learn at this year's BEMP. This session will explore opportunities to reduce regulatory barriers and to improve Australia's planning, communities and provide a strong foundation taxation and procurement practices. It will involve discussion on measures and partnering arrangements for future prosperity. to enhance Australia's • oductive capacity. 3.30pm - 335pm Introduction • This year's BEMP will explore the following i David Parken, CEO, Australian Institute of Architects themes: Prosperity, Liveability, Sustainability .r. 3.35pm - 4.15pm Panel discussion i' and Partnerships. • 7 Keriy Bfwise4reettrrThed6Jlen Consulting Group Sharan Burrow, Presr i t ent, Australian Council of Trade Unions Brendan Lyon, Execut ve Director, Infrastructure Partnerships Australia HOST ORGANISATIONS The Hon Bruce Billso4 MP, Shadow Minister for Sustainable Development and Cities Senator Scott Ludlani, Senator for Western Australia, Australian Greens Mark Dreyfus QC, MP, -Member for Isaacs, Australian Labor Party Planning Australian Institute Institute of PROPERTY 4.15pm - 4.30pm Keynote speaker green building council australia COUNCIL Architects of Australia Senator the Hon Kim ,Carr, Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research ..SSOC.7.4 CONSQL71/43 ENCAtiECRS AUSTRALIA 4.30pm - 5.00pm WRAP UP . Peter Verwer, CEO, Property Council of Australia THANKS TO THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS OUR SUPPORTERS PLATINUM AUSTRALIA SILVER BRONZE SPONSOR AWARD FOR SPONSORS SPONSORS URBAN DESIGN Megan Motto David Parken Romilly Madew Stephen SPONSOR al CEO CEO CE Johnston CEO Association Australian Green Colerbond of Consulting Institute Building Planning 04 Cover...mit STEPt IENSON Engineers of Council of Institute 0.07 WO, Iler.ge rad tim Arb kmgronmentmmungOorneric Aucstn, THIN K •••. Australia Architects Australia of BLUESCOPE BRICK #enginuity Australia STEEL AUSTRALIA engineering recruitment Autodesk Dou glas Partners integratedDESIGNgroup Awn. in lipapi archttuts batflutst Wm.; 111111;11111= I 111111111d-1H II irriminnumnil HIHhIflTUIItLflT www.bemp.com.au www.bemp.com.au KEYNOTE SPEAKERS 4 of 8 PROGRAM TUESDAY 11 A Y 9.. AUSTRALIA AWARD FOR URBAN DESIGN Minister for Minister for F 0 -.7! !, _porn, Hyatt Hotel Canberra Innovation, Industry, the Environment, 6:30pm — 10:30pm The Hon Peter Garrett AM, MP will present the Award on behalf of the Prime Minister. Science and Heritage and Research the Arts MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA AWARD FOR URBAN DESIGN PATRON usi Innovative and creative urban design makes a real difference to quality of life in urban communities. That's why we should alt join in congratulating all of the nominees for the Australia Award for Urban Senator Kim Carr was elected to the Peter Garrett was elected as the Labor Mike Zorbas represents the interests of Design. By showcasing lqading industry practices, the Award makes an important contribution to the development of more liveable and sustainable urban communities. senate in 1993 and to Labor's front Member for Kingsford Smith at the Stockland, Australia's largest diversified bench in 1996, serving first as a 2004 federal election. In 2007, he was property company, to the nation's The Australian Government's commitment to improved urban amenities has been reflected in the Nation parliamentary secretary
Recommended publications
  • A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission

    A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission

    Roman Oszanski A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Preamble I have chosen not to follow the issues papers: their questions are more suited to those planning to expand the nuclear industry, and many of the issues raised are irrelevant if one believes that, based on the evidence, the industry should be left to die a natural death, rather than being supported to the exclusion of more promising technologies. Executive Summary The civil nuclear industry is in decline globally. [Ref charts on existing reactors, rising costs]. It is not an industry of the future, but of the past. If it were not for the intimate connection to the military industry, it would not exist today. There is no economic advantage to SA in expanding the existing industry in this state. Nuclear power does not offer a practical solution to climate change: total lifetime emissions are likely to be (at best) similar to those of gas power plants, and there is insufficient uranium to replace all the goal fired generators. A transition to breeder technologies leaves us with major problems of waste disposal and proliferation of weapons material. Indeed, the problems of weapons proliferation and the black market in fissionable materials mean that we should limit sales of Uranium to countries which are known proliferation risks, or are non- signatories to the NNPT: we should ban sales of Australian Uranium to Russia and India. There is a current oversupply of enrichment facilities, and there is considerable international concern at the possibility of using such facilities to enrich Uranium past reactor grade to weapons grade.
  • HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957

    HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957

    PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TRANSCRIPT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH HON. GIZ WATSON b. 1957 - STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2015-2016 INTERVIEWER: ANNE YARDLEY TRANSCRIBER: ANNE YARDLEY DURATION: 19 HOURS REFERENCE NUMBER: OH4275 COPYRIGHT: PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA. GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [ ] are used for insertions not in the original tape. ii GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS CONTENTS Contents Pages Introduction 1 Interview - 1 4 - 22 Parents, family life and childhood; migrating from England; school and university studies – Penrhos/ Murdoch University; religion – Quakerism, Buddhism; countryside holidays and early appreciation of Australian environment; Anti-Vietnam marches; civil-rights movements; Activism; civil disobedience; sport; studying environmental science; Albany; studying for a trade. Interview - 2 23 - 38 Environmental issues; Campaign to Save Native Forests; non-violent Direct Action; Quakerism; Alcoa; community support and debate; Cockburn Cement; State Agreement Acts; campaign results; legitimacy of activism; “eco- warriors”; Inaugural speech .
  • Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power

    Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power

    Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power Jim Green & Others 2 Dollars for Death Contents Preface by Jim Green............................................................................3 Uranium Mining ...................................................................................5 Uranium Mining in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia..........................5 In Situ Leach Uranium Mining Far From ‘Benign’ by Gavin Mudd.....................8 How Low Can Australia’s Uranium Export Policy Go? by Jim Green................10 Uranium & Nuclear Weapons Proliferation by Jim Falk & Bill Williams..........13 Nuclear Power ...................................................................................16 Ten Reasons to Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Power in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................16 How to Make Nuclear Power Safe in Seven Easy Steps! by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................18 Japan: One Year After Fukushima, People Speak Out by Daniel P. Aldrich......20 Nuclear Power & Water Scarcity by Sue Wareham & Jim Green........................23 James Lovelock & the Big Bang by Jim Green......................................................25 Nuclear Waste ....................................................................................28 Nuclear Power: Watt a Waste .............................................................................28 Nuclear Racism .................................................................................31
  • Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census

    Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census

    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/99687/ c Copyright 2016 Monique Mann and Matthew Rimmer This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. September 2016 SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE ON THE 2016 CENSUS DR MONIQUE MANN LECTURER SCHOOL OF JUSTICE FACULTY OF LAW QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY DR MATTHEW RIMMER PROFESSOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
  • Ministerial Advisers in the Australian System of Responsible Government∗

    Ministerial Advisers in the Australian System of Responsible Government∗

    Between Law and Convention: Yee-Fui Ng Ministerial Advisers in the Australian System of Responsible Government∗ It is hard to feel sorry for politicians. Yet it is undeniable that a modern day minister has many different responsibilities, including managing policy, the media and political issues. Ministers also have to mediate with and appease various stakeholders, including constituents and interest groups. Within the political structure they have to work cooperatively with their prime minister, members of parliament and their political party. It is impossible for one person to shoulder all these tasks single-handedly. Newly elected ministers are faced with a vast and bewildering bureaucracy inherited from the previous government. Although the public service is supposed to be impartial, ministers may not be willing to trust the bureaucracy when a few moments ago it was serving their opponents. Understandably, ministers have the desire to have partisan advisers whom they trust to advise them. This has led to the rise of the ministerial adviser. Ministerial advisers are personally appointed by ministers and work out of the ministers’ private offices. In the last 40 years, ministerial advisers have become an integral part of the political landscape. It all started with the informal ‘kitchen cabinets’, where a small group of the minister’s trusted friends and advisers gathered around the kitchen table to discuss political strategies. This has since become formalised and institutionalised into the role of the partisan ministerial adviser as distinct from the impartial public service. The number of Commonwealth ministerial staff increased from 155 in 1972 to 423 in 2015—an increase of 173 per cent.
  • Tanner Dumps on PM

    Tanner Dumps on PM

    The Sunday Telegraph April 24, 2011 12:00AM Tanner dumps on PM JULIA Gillard is fortunate the next election is two years away. Policy quicksand is dragging the Labor Government down in every direction: asylum seekers, carbon tax, the national broadband network, defence reform and preparations for a killer budget. Disastrous Labor polling shows voters think the Government gets everything wrong. Senior press-gallery commentators are virtually writing off Ms Gillard's chances. And now, a former member of inner-Cabinet's "gang of four", Lindsay Tanner, has pole-axed Ms Gillard. In his upcoming memoir, Mr Tanner, who quit in Ms Gillard's first Question Time as Prime Minister last year, writes: "Whether I like it or not, I have spent much of my adult life in an entertainment industry. "My craft as a politician was swamped by such values. Modern politics now resembles a Hollywood blockbuster: all special effects and no plot." He takes veiled digs at ex-colleagues, in the guise of a critique of "shallow" media coverage: Julia Gillard dyes her hair red, Queensland Premier Anna Bligh has Botox, Kevin Rudd once nibbled his own ear-wax, Mark Latham had "man-boobs". This is a damaging book from a man who makes no secret of his bitterness. Mr Tanner has been at odds with Ms Gillard since their student days. He has publicly expressed distaste for modern Labor since 2003, when Mr Latham became leader. When Mr Rudd was rolled, Mr Tanner retired, leaving the Greens to take his seat of Melbourne. Now, as Ms Gillard grapples with the unwieldy Green-independent balance of power, Mr Tanner throws bombs from the sideline.
  • Take Heart and Name WA's New Federal Seat Vallentine 2015 Marks 30 Years Since Jo Vallentine Took up Her Senate Position

    Take Heart and Name WA's New Federal Seat Vallentine 2015 Marks 30 Years Since Jo Vallentine Took up Her Senate Position

    Take heart and name WA’s new federal seat Vallentine 2015 marks 30 years since Jo Vallentine took up her senate position, the first person in the world to be elected on an anti-nuclear platform. What better way to acknowledge her contribution to peace, nonviolence and protecting the planet than to name a new federal seat after her? The official Australian parliament website describes Jo Vallentine in this way: Jo Vallentine was elected in 1984 to represent Western Australia in the Senate for the Nuclear Disarmament Party, running with the slogan ‘Take Heart—Vote Vallentine’. She commenced her term in July 1985 as an Independent Senator for Nuclear Disarmament, claiming in her first speech that she was the first member of any parliament in the world to be elected on this platform. When she stood for election again in 1990, she was elected as a senator for The Greens (Western Australia), and was the first Green in the Australian Senate. … During her seven years in Parliament, Vallentine was a persistent voice for peace, nuclear disarmament, Aboriginal land rights, social justice and the environment (emphasis added)i. Jo Vallentine’s parliamentary and subsequent career should be recognised in the named seat of Vallentine because: 1. Jo Vallentine was the first woman or person in several roles, in particular: The first person in the world to win a seat based on a platform of nuclear disarmament The first person to be elected to federal parliament as a Greens party politician. The Greens are now Australia’s third largest political party, yet no seat has been named after any of their political representatives 2.
  • Chain-Reaction-#114-April-2012.Pdf

    Chain-Reaction-#114-April-2012.Pdf

    Issue #114 | April 2012 RRP $5.50 The National Magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia www.foe.org.au ukushima fone year on • Occupy Texas Can we save the • Fighting Ferguson’s nuclear dump Murray-Darling? • A smart grid and seven energy sources • How low can uranium export policy go? 1 Chain Reaction #114 April 2012 Contents Edition #114 − April 2012 Regular items Publisher FoE Australia News 4 FoE Australia Contacts Friends of the Earth, Australia Chain Reaction ABN 81600610421 FoE Australia ABN 18110769501 FoE International News 8 inside back cover www.foe.org.au youtube.com/user/FriendsOfTheEarthAUS Features twitter.com/FoEAustralia facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-the-Earth- MURRAY-DARLING NUCLEAR POWER & FUKUSHIMA Australia/16744315982 AND RIVER RED GUMS Fighting Ferguson’s Dump 20 flickr.com/photos/foeaustralia Can we save the Natalie Wasley Chain Reaction website Murray-Darling Basin? 10 Global Conference for a www.foe.org.au/chain-reaction Jonathan La Nauze Nuclear Power Free World 22 Climate change and the Cat Beaton and Peter Watts Chain Reaction contact details Murray-Darling Plan 13 Fukushima − one year on: PO Box 222,Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065. Jamie Pittock photographs 24 email: [email protected] phone: (03) 9419 8700 River Red Gum vegetation Australia’s role in the survey project 14 Fukushima disaster 26 Chain Reaction team Aaron Eulenstein Jim Green Jim Green, Kim Stewart, Georgia Miller, Rebecca Pearse, Who is to blame for the Richard Smith, Elena McMaster, Tessa Sellar MIC CHECK: Fukushima nuclear disaster? 28 Layout
  • Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard

    Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard

    This is a repository copy of Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82697/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Heppell, T and Bennister, M (2015) Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. Government and Opposition, FirstV. 1 - 26. ISSN 1477-7053 https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.31 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard Abstract This article examines the interaction between the respective party structures of the Australian Labor Party and the British Labour Party as a means of assessing the strategic options facing aspiring challengers for the party leadership.
  • Osos Sobre Toro

    Osos Sobre Toro

    OSOS SOBRE TORO Assessment of Wiluna Uranium Project Report prepared by: Economists at Large Pty Ltd Melbourne, Australia www.ecolarge.com [email protected] Phone: +61 3 9005 0154 | Fax: +61 3 8080 1604 65 Bevan St, Albert Park VIC 3206, Melbourne, Australia Citation: Economists at Large, 2013, Osos sobre Toro: Assessment of Wiluna Uranium Project, a report for Senator Scott Ludlam and the member groups of the Anti-Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia, prepared by Economists at Large, Melbourne, Australia. Authors: Rod Campbell Julie Beatty Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the organisations involved. This report is distributed with the understanding that the authors are not responsible for the results of any actions undertaken on the basis of the information that is contained within, nor for any omission from, or error in, this publication. Economists at Large 2 Executive summary The Wiluna project is presently the most advanced uranium project in West Australia and is poised to commence development pending final approval of its environmental management plan including securing a bond for closure and rehabilitation costs and, importantly, pending financing from a joint venture equity partner. Our modelling of the project economics suggests a positive net present value (NPV) of $A 34Mn, however, this does not include any closure costs for the project. There has been no official closure cost estimate submitted by Toro Energy that we are aware of. We conducted an NPV sensitivity analysis and concluded that: Adding a closure cost to the model based on closed uranium mines in Europe and the USA will almost certainly deliver negative NPV even if incurred at the end of the project in 2029.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-FIFTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION 14 October 2003 (extract from Book 4) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor JOHN LANDY, AC, MBE The Lieutenant-Governor Lady SOUTHEY, AM The Ministry Premier and Minister for Multicultural Affairs ....................... The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Environment, Minister for Water and Minister for Victorian Communities.............................. The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP Minister for Finance and Minister for Consumer Affairs............... The Hon. J. Lenders, MLC Minister for Education Services and Minister for Employment and Youth Affairs....................................................... The Hon. J. M. Allan, MP Minister for Transport and Minister for Major Projects................ The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Local Government and Minister for Housing.............. The Hon. C. C. Broad, MLC Treasurer, Minister for Innovation and Minister for State and Regional Development......................................... The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Minister for Agriculture........................................... The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Planning, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Women’s Affairs................................... The Hon. M. E. Delahunty, MP Minister for Community Services.................................. The Hon. S. M. Garbutt, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services
  • A Report on the Erosion of Press Freedom in Australia

    A Report on the Erosion of Press Freedom in Australia

    BREAKING: A report on the erosion of press freedom in Australia REPORT WRITTEN BY: SCOTT LUDLAM AND DAVID PARIS Press Freedom in Australia 2 Our Right to a Free Press 3 Law Enforcement and Intelligence Powers 4 Surveillance 7 Detention of Australian Journalists and Publishers 10 Freedom of Information 11 CONTENTS Defamation Law 12 The Australian Media Market 13 ABC at Risk 14 Fair and Balanced Legislation Proposal 15 How Does Australia Compare Internationally? 16 What Can We Do? 17 A Media Freedom Act 18 About the Authors: David Paris and Scott Ludlam 19 References 20 1 PRESS FREEDOM IN AUSTRALIA “Freedom of information journalists working on national is the freedom that allows security issues, and the privacy of the Australian public. Australians you to verify the existence are now among the most heavily of all the other freedoms.” surveilled populations in the world. - Win Tin, Burmese journalist. Law enforcement agencies can access extraordinary amounts In June 2019, the Australian of information with scant Federal Police raided the ABC and judicial oversight, and additional the home of a journalist from the safeguards for journalists within Daily Telegraph. These alarming these regimes are narrowly raids were undertaken because framed and routinely bypassed. of journalists doing their jobs reporting on national security Australia already lagged behind issues in the public interest, in when it comes to press freedom. part enabled by whistleblowers We are the only democracy on inside government agencies. the planet that has not enshrined the right to a free press in our This was just the latest step in constitution or a charter or bill what has been a steady erosion of rights.