Poverty Alleviation for All

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poverty Alleviation for All FEBRUARY 2003 • ASIA DIVISION Laos Poverty Alleviation for all Contents Foreword by Sida ....................................................................................... I Preface ..................................................................................................... II Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................. 5 1.0 Lao as a national language and culture .................................... 5 1.1 The Anthropology of development and development anthropology ............................................................................. 8 1.1.1 Traditional applications of anthropology ................................. 8 1.1.2 Anthropological views of development..................................... 9 1.2 What kind of anthropologhy to pursue in relation to development? .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Physical versus mental in research and analysis...................... 12 1.4 Finally, what is cultural change? ............................................. 14 Chapter 2 Upland population, density and land use ........................ 16 2.0 Population in relation to forests .............................................. 16 2.1 Demography in the uplands.................................................... 17 2.2 Ethnolinguistic composition .................................................... 25 2.3 Migration trends ..................................................................... 29 2.4 Conclusion .............................................................................. 31 Chapter 3 Government policy ....................................................... 32 3.0 Brief history of economic policy ............................................ 32 3.1 Land allocation ....................................................................... 33 3.2 Rural development and socioeconomic planning ................... 34 3.3 Ethnic minority policy ............................................................ 35 3.4 Resettlement ............................................................................ 36 3.5 Conclusions ............................................................................. 37 Chapter 4 The market in relation to the uplands ............................. 38 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................ 38 4.2 Ethno-economics..................................................................... 39 4.3 Typology of ethnic groups with respect to maximization ...... 46 4.4 Conclusions ............................................................................. 49 1 Chapter 5 Language, poverty and development ............................. 51 5.0 Language and intellectual poverty .......................................... 51 5.1 Language planning and policy ................................................ 53 5.1.1 Multilingualism and cognitive capacity .................................. 56 (Economic approaches to language and bilingualism) 5.2 Language and the environment .............................................. 59 5.3 Conclusions ............................................................................. 60 Chapter 6 Conclusions and recommendations ............................... 62 6.0 Setting the scene ...................................................................... 62 6.1 Sectoral implications and general recommendations ............. 66 6.2 Intellectual infrastructure and upland development............... 68 6.2.1 Some specific recommendations and postures........................ 68 Acronyms/Abbreviations .............................................................. 71 References .................................................................................. 72 Appendix 1 Ethnic minorities in the Lao PDR .................................. 76 Appendix 2 Bibliography of languages and the environment and multilingualism............................................................ 82 Appendix 3 Bibliography of Lao minorities and minority issues ........ 98 Appendix 4 An example of ethnic diversity and niche-ing ............... 112 Figures Figure 1 Villages by slope .................................................................... 18 Figure 2 Northern Lao villages (1) ...................................................... 19 Figure 3 Northern Lao villages (2) ...................................................... 20 Figure 4 Upland villages in Phongsaly ................................................ 21 Figure 5 Population distribution by ethnicity ...................................... 26 Figure 6 Map of Lao minorities .......................................................... 28 Figure 7 Typology of uplanders with respect to maximization .......... 47 Figure 8 Indicators of societal type ..................................................... 47 Published by Sida 2003 The Asia Department Author: James R. Chamberlain Print: Elanders Novum AB, 2003 Articlenumber: SIDA2226en ISBN: 91-586-8606-8 2 3 Preface In thinking and writing on such matters as poverty in the uplands of Laos one is led to consider the elusive and discursive, not to mention the often contradictory nature of this rubric which has yet to become a discipline. Relations between the disciplines upon which poverty touches are in a constant state of renewal and are the subject of on-going discov- eries, and critiques. Having shifted from an essentially philosophical and religious concept into one that has come to be dominated by physiocrats and economists who speak of measurements and imputed values, the study of poverty has now arrived at a bifurcation in the road between quantitative and qualitative directions, and this might be spoken of roughly as the gap between signifiers of well-being defined in biochemi- cal terms, and those which are defined in terms of mental process. There is a humorous saying, “when you come to a fork in the road, take it.” And in keeping with this sentiment we have opted in the present study to adopt the vantage point of the gap, the place that is usually overlooked, and it might be thought of, following Bateson (1979) as the point of view of the eco-mental system. The presuppositions used are essentially the findings of the PPA, especially the finding that poverty emerges in Laos almost entirely from the disruption of production systems that are embedded in religion, or what in the broad sense we call livelihood. These disruptions have taken the form of war, of resettlement, of epidemic disease in humans and animals, and of poorly implemented development policies such as land- forest allocation. The result are systemic pathologies that affect the well- being of the eco-mental system. We might also venture that all of these sets of causations ultimately result from epistemological errors, errors in thinking and analysis, some- times introduced from the outside, and sometimes implicit in develop- ment approaches. Whatever the source, we may broadly remark that the problems of upland poverty alleviation cannot be resolved solely through a focus on the upland villages, for it is the relationship between uplanders and lowlanders which is at the root of the misunderstandings and which have lead to the conditions of poverty that exist there today. Poverty, as was made explicit in the PPA, is not an endemic condition of the up- lands, and one has only to read the ethnographies of upland groups to see that this was not the case. What is lacking is a means through which the misunderstandings can be corrected. Our study has therefore been framed in this way in order to overcome certain elementary difficulties which are grounded in conventional thinking and it is only the wisdom of the terms of reference by Sida that has permitted this focus and this analytical vantage point. It has allowed for the dispelling of some myths associated with population, for the natural history of social systems to emerge with respect to markets, and for the focus on the gap that is the concern of language and interethnic relationships. It is our sincere hope that this study will, in this way, enhance our understanding and in so-doing contribute to the alleviation of poverty for all. James R. Chamberlain Panh Phomsombath 4 Chapter 1 Introduction It is neither objectively identified organic well-being nor ecosystemic integrity but culturally constructed value and meaning that the cybernetics of human social systems tend, in the first instance, to preserve. The relationship of these culturally constructed meanings and values to organic well-being and ecosystemic integrity is the central problem for ecological anthropology. – Roy Rappaport 1.0 Lao as a national language and culture 1. Although the greater portion of this study will focus on ethnic minori- ties in the upland areas of Laos, there is often a decided lack of consen- sus on the nature and definition of the group in comparison to which the upland peoples are considered as ‘minorities.’ The problem is interest- ingly enough, not a new one. Early European colonists and missionaries who remained and worked in Laos often found they had more difficulties communicating with and understanding the lowland cultures of South- east Asia than they did with those of the uplands. The hard working maximizing uplanders shared many values with the foreigners, the work ethic being primary among them, along with a perceived ‘honest’ and ‘simple’ approach to life. One directly observable result has been that throughout the main- land, especially
Recommended publications
  • Mon-Khmer Studies Volume 41
    Mon-Khmer Studies VOLUME 42 The journal of Austroasiatic languages and cultures Established 1964 Copyright for these papers vested in the authors Released under Creative Commons Attribution License Volume 42 Editors: Paul Sidwell Brian Migliazza ISSN: 0147-5207 Website: http://mksjournal.org Published in 2013 by: Mahidol University (Thailand) SIL International (USA) Contents Papers (Peer reviewed) K. S. NAGARAJA, Paul SIDWELL, Simon GREENHILL A Lexicostatistical Study of the Khasian Languages: Khasi, Pnar, Lyngngam, and War 1-11 Michelle MILLER A Description of Kmhmu’ Lao Script-Based Orthography 12-25 Elizabeth HALL A phonological description of Muak Sa-aak 26-39 YANIN Sawanakunanon Segment timing in certain Austroasiatic languages: implications for typological classification 40-53 Narinthorn Sombatnan BEHR A comparison between the vowel systems and the acoustic characteristics of vowels in Thai Mon and BurmeseMon: a tendency towards different language types 54-80 P. K. CHOUDHARY Tense, Aspect and Modals in Ho 81-88 NGUYỄN Anh-Thư T. and John C. L. INGRAM Perception of prominence patterns in Vietnamese disyllabic words 89-101 Peter NORQUEST A revised inventory of Proto Austronesian consonants: Kra-Dai and Austroasiatic Evidence 102-126 Charles Thomas TEBOW II and Sigrid LEW A phonological description of Western Bru, Sakon Nakhorn variety, Thailand 127-139 Notes, Reviews, Data-Papers Jonathan SCHMUTZ The Ta’oi Language and People i-xiii Darren C. GORDON A selective Palaungic linguistic bibliography xiv-xxxiii Nathaniel CHEESEMAN, Jennifer
    [Show full text]
  • A New Method of Classification for Tai Textiles
    A New Method of Classification for Tai Textiles Patricia Cheesman Textiles, as part of Southeast Asian traditional clothing and material culture, feature as ethnic identification markers in anthropological studies. Textile scholars struggle with the extremely complex variety of textiles of the Tai peoples and presume that each Tai ethnic group has its own unique dress and textile style. This method of classification assumes what Leach calls “an academic fiction … that in a normal ethnographic situation one ordinarily finds distinct tribes distributed about the map in an orderly fashion with clear-cut boundaries between them” (Leach 1964: 290). Instead, we find different ethnic Tai groups living in the same region wearing the same clothing and the same ethnic group in different regions wearing different clothing. For example: the textiles of the Tai Phuan peoples in Vientiane are different to those of the Tai Phuan in Xiang Khoang or Nam Nguem or Sukhothai. At the same time, the Lao and Tai Lue living in the same region in northern Vietnam weave and wear the same textiles. Some may try to explain the phenomena by calling it “stylistic influence”, but the reality is much more profound. The complete repertoire of a people’s style of dress can be exchanged for another and the common element is geography, not ethnicity. The subject of this paper is to bring to light forty years of in-depth research on Tai textiles and clothing in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos), Thailand and Vietnam to demonstrate that clothing and the historical transformation of practices of social production of textiles are best classified not by ethnicity, but by geographical provenance.
    [Show full text]
  • CARE Rapid Gender Analysis an Analysis of Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Among Flood-Affected Communities in Attapeu Province, Lao PDR
    CARE Rapid Gender Analysis An analysis of gender equality and social inclusion among flood-affected communities in Attapeu Province, Lao PDR 4 October 2018, Version 1 1 Elizabeth Cowan CARE International in Lao PDR Acknowledgements This Rapid Gender Analysis is supported by the Australian Government and has benefitted from the valuable contributions from CARE International colleagues, especially Phetsakhone Somphongbouthakanh, CARE in Lao PDR’s Gender Advisor. Disclaimer This publication has been funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The views expressed in this publication are the author’s alone and are not necessarily the views of the Australian Government. 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Key findings ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Background information on Lao PDR flooding ................................................................................ 2 The Rapid Gender, Equality and Social Inclusion Analysis objectives ............................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Language Change in Iu Mien and Their Implication for Language Maintenance: a Case Study of the Iu Mien Students’ Story Writing Workshop1
    Volume 3 Number 1, January-June 2015 Aspects of Language Change in Iu Mien and Their Implication for Language Maintenance: A Case Study of the Iu Mien Students’ Story Writing Workshop1 T. Daniel Arisawa The Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, Thailand. ABSTRACT reveals their unfamiliarity with the This paper discusses some treatment of the tone sandhi, the low aspects of language change rise falling tone, and legitimate Thai happening in Iu Mien in Thailand. tone rules. Besides the phonology and The changes were found in the Iu orthography, the proofreading and Mien stories written by the students revision process of the book by seven of Chiang Rai Rajabhat University mature speakers of Iu Mien (in their 40‟ 70‟ and others who attended the Story s to s) has revealed that Writers Workshop organized by the language change is underway among Linguistics Institute, Payap Univer- the young generation through contact sity, Chiang Mai. Nine stories, with Standard Thai. The aspects of including legends and newly written shift include wrong lexical choice ones, were compiled into a 46 page due to lack of cultural knowledge, book. It was a significant phrase level word order change, achievement in that it was the first unnaturalness and wrong colloquia- attempt by the Iu Mien at the lism, unnecessary insertion of university level to document tradi- complement clause introducer k‟ tional legends and to write stories of (gorngv „spea ), lack/redundancy of their own creation. discourse particles, and distortion of As such, their use of Thai- narrative formulaic expression. The based Iu Mien orthography therein original and correct forms of these grammatical and usage changes are 1I would like to express my gratitude to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Language, Myth, Histories, and the Position of the Phong in Houaphan
    Neither Kha, Tai, nor Lao: Language, Myth, Histories, and the Position of the Phong in Houaphan Oliver Tappe1 Nathan Badenoch2 Abstract In this paper we explore the intersections between oral and colonial history to re-examine the formation and interethnic relations in the uplands of Northern Laos. We unpack the historical and contemporary dynamics between “majority” Tai, “minority” Kha groups and the imagined cultural influence of “Lao” to draw out a more nuanced set of narratives about ethnicity, linguistic diversity, cultural contact, historical intimacy, and regional imaginings to inform our understanding of upland society. The paper brings together fieldwork and archival research, drawing on previous theoretical and areal analysis of both authors. 1. Introduction The Phong of Laos are a small group of 30,000 people with historical strongholds in the Sam Neua and Houamuang districts of Houaphan province (northeastern Laos). They stand out among the various members of the Austroasiatic language family – which encompass 33 out of the 50 ethnic groups in Laos – as one of the few completely Buddhicized groups. Unlike their animist Khmu neighbours, they have been Buddhist since precolonial times (see Bouté 2018 for the related example of the Phunoy, a Tibeto-Burman speaking group in Phongsaly Province). In contrast to the Khmu (Évrard, Stolz), Rmeet (Sprenger), Katu (Goudineau, High), Hmong (Lemoine, Tapp), Phunoy (Bouté), and other ethnic groups in Laos, the Phong still lack a thorough ethnographic study. Joachim Schliesinger (2003: 236) even called them “an obscure people”. This working paper is intended as first step towards exploring the history, language, and culture of this less known group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 FAO/WFP Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to the Lao People's Democratic Republic
    ISSN 2707-2479 SPECIAL REPORT 2019 FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION (CFSAM) TO THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 9 April 2020 SPECIAL REPORT 2019 FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION (CFSAM) TO THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 9 April 2020 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Special Report - 2019 FAO/WFP Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8392en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISSN 2707-2479 [Print] ISSN 2707-2487 [Online] ISBN 978-92-5-132344-1 [FAO] © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4-2:2011
    JSEALS Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Managing Editor: Paul Sidwell (Pacific Linguistics, Canberra) Editorial Advisory Board: Mark Alves (USA) George Bedell (Thailand) Marc Brunelle (Canada) Gerard Diffloth (Cambodia) Marlys Macken (USA) Brian Migliazza (USA) Keralapura Nagaraja (India) Peter Norquest (USA) Amara Prasithrathsint (Thailand) Martha Ratliff (USA) Sophana Srichampa (Thailand) Justin Watkins (UK) JSEALS is the peer-reviewed journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, and is devoted to publishing research on the languages of mainland and insular Southeast Asia. It is an electronic journal, distributed freely by Pacific Linguistics (www.pacling.com) and the JSEALS website (jseals.org). JSEALS was formally established by decision of the SEALS 17 meeting, held at the University of Maryland in September 2007. It supersedes the Conference Proceedings, previously published by Arizona State University and later by Pacific Linguistics. JSEALS welcomes articles that are topical, focused on linguistic (as opposed to cultural or anthropological) issues, and which further the lively debate that characterizes the annual SEALS conferences. Although we expect in practice that most JSEALS articles will have been presented and discussed at the SEALS conference, submission is open to all regardless of their participation in SEALS meetings. Papers are expected to be written in English. Each paper is reviewed by at least two scholars, usually a member of the Advisory Board and one or more independent readers. Reviewers are volunteers, and we are grateful for their assistance in ensuring the quality of this publication. As an additional service we also admit data papers, reports and notes, subject to an internal review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights from Three Language Families in Southwest China
    Highlights from three Language Families in Southwest China Matthias Gerner RFLR Monographs Matthias Gerner Highlights from three Language Families in Southwest China RFLR Monographs Volume 3 Matthias Gerner Highlights from three Language Families in Southwest China Burmese-Lolo, Tai-Kadai, Miao Research Foundation Language and Religion e-Book ISBN 978-3-947306-91-6 e-Book DOI https://doi.org/10.23772/9783947306916 Print ISBN 978-3-947306-90-9 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie and available in the Internet at https://www.dnb.de. © 2019 Research Foundation Language and Religion Duisburg, Germany https://www.rflr.org Printing and binding: Print Simply GmbH, Frankfurt Printed in Germany IX Acknowledgement God created rare language phenomena like those hidden in the Burmese-Lolo, Tai-Kadai and Miao languages which are the subject of this monograph (Proverbs 25:2). I am grateful to Emil Reschke and Siegfried Lechner of Research Foundation Language and Religion for their kind assistance. The following native speakers have provided helpful discussion: Michael Mǎhǎi 马海, Zhū Wén Xù 朱文旭, Hú Sùhúa 胡素华, Āyù Jĭpō 阿育几坡, Shí Défù 石德富, Zhāng Yǒngxiáng 张永祥, Wú Zhèngbiāo 吴正彪, Xióng Yùyǒu 熊玉有, Zhāng Yǒng 张勇, Wú Shìhuá 吴世华, Shí Lín 石林, Yáng Chéngxīng 杨成星, Lǐ Xùliàn 李旭练. The manuscript received feedback from colleagues who commented on the data presented at eleven international conferences between 2006 and 2016. Thanks are due to Jens Weigel for the cover design and to Jason Kline for proofreading the manuscript. X Preface The Burmese-Lolo, Tai-Kadai, Miao-Yao and Chinese languages form a loose Sprachbund in Southwest China with hundreds of languages coexisting and assimilating to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Epr Atlas 1080
    Laos Ethnicity in Laos Group selection Laos is a multi-ethnic country officially encompassing 49 ethnic groups (2910), which have been grouped primarily by language and 2910 [National Statistics Center of the Lao PDR, 2006] location into one of three categories: the Lao Loum (Lowland Lao), and the hill tribes constituting of the Lao Theung (Upper Lao) and the Lao Sung (Highland Lao) (2911; 2912, 247-248). Based on this 2911 [National Statistics Center of the Lao PDR, 2006] classification and linguistic considerations, we identify the following 2912 [Levinson, 1998] politically relevant groups: • The Lao (incl. Phuan) make up just over half of the total population according to the 2015 census and tend to be con- centrated in the flatlands and valleys (2913). They speak Lao, a 2913 [Minority Rights Group International, 2018a] Tai-language, and are the largest and most important Lao Loum group (2914, 247). Most people from this group are Theravada 2914 [Levinson, 1998] Buddhists (2915). 2915 [Minority Rights Group International, 2018a] • The remaining Lao Tai speakers include the lowland Phu Tai and several tribes who live in the higher valleys and on the middle slopes of the mountains in northern Laos. The tribes are usually categorized according to their traditional costumes, e.g. the Tai Dam (Black Tai). They are regarded as inferior by lowland Lao, and Tai, in turn, look down on lowland Lao for having failed to maintain Tai tradition and culture (2916). 2916 [Minority Rights Group International, 2018b] • The Lao Theung, sometimes called Lao Thoeng tend to inhabit mid-level slopes and speak numerous Mon-Khmer languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Suford Niko Kaj 1
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forestry Sustainable Forestry for Rural Development Project ‐ Additional Financing (SUFORD ‐ AF) Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Ethnic Groups in SUFORD AF Production Forest Areas: A Rapid Assessment Nikolas Århem 2010 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction____________________________________________________________ 9 1.1. Background 9 1.2. Terminology 9 1.2.1. Indigenous or ethnic group 9 1.2.2. Lao Lum, Lao Theung, Lao Sung 10 1.2.3. Shifting cultivation 10 1.2.4. Resettlement or spontaneous migration 11 1.3. What is Traditional Ecological Knowledge 11 1.3.1. Indigenous “technology”, land use and settlement patterns 12 1.3.2. Indigenous taboos and regulations 13 1.3.3. Indigenous knowledge regarding plants and animals 13 1.4. Objectives 14 2. Methodology___________________________________________________________15 2.1. Study Site Selection 15 2.2. Field Methods 19 2.2.1. Interviews and questionnaires 19 2.2.2. Community mapping 20 Part One: RESULTS 3. Village Profiles 22 3.1. Xayabouli Province 22 3.2. Vientiane and Bolikhamxay Provinces 27 3.2.1. Vientiane 27 3.2.2. Bolikhamxay 28 3.3. Attapeu and Xekong Provinces 31 3.3.1. Attapeu province 31 3.3.2. Xekong province 32 3.4. Comparative Observations 39 3.4.1. Villages in northern/central provinces 39 3.4.2. Villages in southern provinces 42 4. Local Forest Managment and Traditional Ecological Knowledge 44 4.1. Shifting Cultivation 44 4.2. Some Notes on Landscape Terminology in Kaleum 47 4.3. Sacred Forests 49 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaria Transmission by Anopheles Dirus in Attapeu Province, Lao Pdr
    MALARIA TRANSMISSION BY AN. DIRUS IN LAO PDR MALARIA TRANSMISSION BY ANOPHELES DIRUS IN ATTAPEU PROVINCE, LAO PDR B Sidavong1, I Vythilingam2, R Phetsouvanh1, ST Chan2, T Phonemixay1, S Lokman Hakim2 and S Phompida1 1Center for Malaria, Parasitology and Entomology, Vientiane, Lao PDR; 2Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract. A study was carried out in four malaria-endemic villages in Attapeu Province, in the southern region of Lao PDR. All-night human landing collections were carried out in May, August, and October 2002, to determine malaria vectors. At the same time, mass blood surveys were also carried out in the same villages. Anopheles dirus was the predominant species in three of the study villages. Sporozoites were found only in An. drius from Phou Hom. However, in Beng Phoukham, An. dirus was positive for oocysts. The distribution of malaria cases was highest in Phou Hom and this correlated well with the vectorial capacity of An. dirus. The risk for infection from An. dirus was also high, at 0.99. INTRODUCTION Mekong Region. Since An. dirus has been found in Sekong, which is a province in the south, we Malaria is a serious public health problem wanted to determine how far south An. dirus was in Lao PDR, which is a landlocked country. Most present. malaria cases are reported from the provinces south of Vientiane, the capital of Lao PDR. Very Attapeu Province is the southern-most prov- little is known about the malaria vectors in Lao ince of Lao PDR, and it has common borders with PDR, as mosquito dissections have not been car- Vietnam and Cambodia.
    [Show full text]
  • ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011
    Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Lao PDR’s Agricultural and Land Management Policies, Plans, and Programmes Project “Agro-Biodiversity Project” (ABP) Inception Workshop Report December 2011 ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011 ii ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011 Table of Contents Project Overview ......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................iv PROJECT UPDATE...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Clarifications of terminology and concepts .............................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Biodiversity related issues .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Conservation and sustainable use ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Participatory Forest and Land Use Planning – tool for agro-biodiversity management ....................................
    [Show full text]