DOCSLIB.ORG

Obrist 65X45cm 260510[2]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obrist 65X45cm 260510[2] 3 June – 29 August 2010 Hermann Obrist ART NOUVEAU SCULPTOR Hermann Obrist (1862–1927) made a major contribution to European art at the turn of the 20th century, through his innovative designs in two and three dimensions. He enjoyed the new freedoms of the Jugendstil movement, the German Art Nouveau, which sought to blend the sophisticated craftsmanship of the decorative arts with the aesthetic aspirations of the fi ne arts. This is the fi rst retrospective exhibition of his work, which until now has only been partially understood. The exhibition brings together all aspects of Obrist’s art. It includes three-dimensional works, photographs, drawings, notes and source illustrations which together show the development of his ideas. The exhibition is divided into three sections, concentrating on Obrist’s decorative work for an indoor environment; on his utopian plaster models; and on his monumental outdoor commissions. Originated by the Museum für Gestaltung in Zurich and Graphische Sammlung in Munich, the exhibition has been accompanied by a collaborative research exercise dedicated to Obrist’s oeuvre. The fi ndings of this project will be presented at a conference at the Institute on 26th June. A fully illustrated bi-lingual catalogue, including essays and the fi rst publication of Obrist’s autobiographical sketch, ‘A Happy Life’, is available at reception. Hermann Obrist as Art Nouveau designer: nature as inspiration Like other Art Nouveau artists, Obrist drew upon nature for his work. However, he was not so much interested in representing the outward appearance of natural forms as in expressing their inner workings – those internal forces, which manifest themselves as movement and growth. Obrist was deeply involved in both the natural and spiritual worlds, having originally studied medicine but also having been affected by supernatural visions since childhood. He was a passionate naturalist, and made frequent expeditions into the countryside to collect specimens to examine under the microscope. He also amassed books on natural history and kept cuttings from magazines and journals, which he used as source material for his work. All these infl uences are apparent in Obrist’s notes and drawings, many of which are displayed in the exhibition for the fi rst time. Here, he explored details from nature and reworked photographs of natural phenomena. He also illustrated his own imaginings. Obrist was particularly acclaimed for his embroidery designs, made in his own workshop by a team of Italian needlewomen. Their patterns were often based on simple plant forms, such as grasses or lichen, but rather than present them as static images he suggested their metamorphosis through the use of layered stitches and light- refl ecting yarns. Few of his embroideries survive, and they are represented here mostly through photographs. Hermann Obrist as visionary: architectural projects in plaster Around 1900, Obrist’s main focus shifted from indoors to outdoors. The embroideries, furniture and artefacts of his early years were overtaken by memorials and monumental structures for outdoor locations, including tombs, urns, fountains and free-standing sculptures. The latter were unlike anything else seen in their day – part decorative object, part abstract sculpture, part architectural edifi ce. The plaster models displayed here are all that survive of this oeuvre, having been rescued from Obrist’s studio by his daughters in 1944, shortly before the bombardment of Munich during World War II. What was important to Obrist was the sense of vitality and energy conveyed by an object, not only in its structure – “everything spirals, radiates, swirls” – but also in its surface texture. Through the sophisticated carving and modelling, he created intense contrasts between light and shade. He also worked each section of the surface in a different way in order to stimulate the sense of touch. Thus, his objects reveal new aspects of themselves to viewers as they move around. For instance, when circling ‘Possible Model of an Urn in the Form of a Capital’, a series of natural forms become visible, including crystals, mussels, and waves. Hermann Obrist as monumental designer: tombs and fountains From 1898, Obrist created around thirty monumental fountains and memorials for patrons across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Some have since been altered or destroyed, but others have been rediscovered only recently. They are considered his invisible masterpieces, documented at the time through photographs commissioned by the artist himself. These large outdoor projects occupy a middle ground between sculpture and architecture, each one designed for a particular site and function. As Obrist described: “What matters in a monumental fountain is that the water sprays forth in abundance from waterspouts that are both rational and beautiful, and that it plunges down from an effective height into an interesting basin, in which its springs and eddies can be seen and enjoyed.” Between 1900 and 1914, memorials accounted for the greater part of Obrist’s creative output. He made an important contribution to the establishment of a new iconography for tomb architecture, in which forms derived from nature were used to convey organic power and thus life itself. His monuments also show the infl uence of Gothic, Moorish and even Indian architecture, which he believed were inspired by “higher powers of cosmic creativity”. 1896 First embroidery works are exhibited at the Kunstsalon Littauer in Hermann Obrist: biography Munich, establishing Obrist’s reputation as an Art Nouveau designer. 1898 Co-founds the Associated Workshops for Art in Crafts in Munich. Marries Marie-Luise Lampe of Leipzig. 1862 Born in Kilchberg on Lake Zurich on 27 May, the second of four children, 1900 Exhibits and lectures widely in Germany on applied arts and is to the Swiss physician Carl Kaspar Obrist and Scottish noblewoman awarded a gold medal for embroidery at the Paris World Exhibition. Alice Jane Grant Duff of Eden. Daughter Leila is born (she disappears in 1947). 1875 Experiences the fi rst of many supernatural visions upon the death of 1901 Exhibits 22 sculptures at the 1st Exhibition of Art in Crafts at the his elder brother. Alte Nationalmuseum in Munich (now the Museum of Ethnology), 1876 Moves to Weimar with his mother following parents’ separation. and a selection of fountains and urns in the atrium of the Museum of Decorative Arts in Berlin (now the Martin-Gropius-Bau). 1885 Enrols as a student of Medicine & Natural Sciences at Heidelberg University. Daughter Amaranth is born. 1886 6 May; is struck by the fi rst of his ‘city’ visions, in which he sees houses, complete with interiors, gardens and fountains, as well as cemeteries 1902 Founds the Teaching- and Experimental- Studios for Applied and with wooded tombstones. Produces fi rst sketches as a result. Free Arts in Munich with Wilhelm von Debschitz. 1887 After becoming disenchanted with his studies, embarks on a career as 1903 Publishes collected essays and lectures, titled New Possibilities of an artist. Travels fi rst to England and then Scotland, the ancestral home the Visual Arts. of his mother, where he discovers the Arts & Crafts movement. This is followed by a brief attendance at the Karlsruhe Academy of Applied Arts 1904 Is awarded a gold medal for a buckle design at the World Exhibition and an apprenticeship as a potter in Jena, Central Germany. in St. Louis, USA. Abandons teaching due to hearing problems and 1890 Is accepted as a student of Sculpture at the Académie Julian in Paris, overwork and devotes himself to sculpture. During this period Obrist where he encounters the work of Auguste Rodin. Begins to make fi rst produces many of his greatest works, including the Krupp Fountain portrait busts and wall-mounted fountains. and Movement. 1892 Moves to Florence to practice as a sculptor. Here he learns the art of 1914 Collaborates with the architect Henry van de Velde on the Werkbund marbling and meets the American art historian Bernard Berenson and exhibition in Cologne. During World War I, increasingly withdraws from his partner, the art critic Mary Smith Costelloe. Establishes an public life and is dogged by serious illnesses, including cerebral embroidery studio with his mother’s companion, Berthe Ruchet. anaemia and peripheral neuralgia. 1895 Relocates to Munich and works on the construction of an artist’s residence on Carl-Theodor-Strasse 24 in Schwabing, completed in 1896. 1919 Participates in the Exhibition for Unknown Architects at the The studio furnishings, made according to Obrist’s own designs and Graphisches Kabinett Neu mann in Berlin. those of Bernhard Pankok and Richard Riemerschmid, become the foundations of Jugendstil – the German Art Nouveau movement. 1927 Dies in Munich on 26 February..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus
    Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus Staatliches Bauhaus, commonly known simply as Bauhaus, was a school in Germany that combined crafts and the fine arts, and was famous for the approach to design that it publicized and taught. It operated from 1919 to 1933. At that time the German term Bauhaus, literally "house of construction" stood for "School of Building". The Bauhaus school was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar. In spite of its name, and the fact that its founder was an architect, the Bauhaus did not have an architecture department during the first years of its existence. Nonetheless it was founded with the idea of creating a The Bauhaus Dessau 'total' work of art in which all arts, including architecture would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.[1] The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. The school existed in three German cities (Weimar from 1919 to 1925, Dessau from 1925 to 1932 and Berlin from 1932 to 1933), under three different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928, 1921/2, Walter Gropius's Expressionist Hannes Meyer from 1928 to 1930 and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Monument to the March Dead from 1930 until 1933, when the school was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime. The changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus, technique, instructors, and politics. For instance: the pottery shop was discontinued when the school moved from Weimar to Dessau, even though it had been an important revenue source; when Mies van der Rohe took over the school in 1930, he transformed it into a private school, and would not allow any supporters of Hannes Meyer to attend it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bauhaus 1 / 70
    GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE BAUHAUS 1 / 70 The Bauhaus 1 Art and Technology, A New Unity 3 2 The Bauhaus Workshops 13 3 Origins 26 4 Weimar 45 5 Dessau 57 6 Berlin 68 © Kevin Woodland, 2020 GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE BAUHAUS 2 / 70 © Kevin Woodland, 2020 GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE ARTS & CRAFTS MOVEMENT 3 / 70 1919–1933 Art and Technology, A New Unity A German design school where ideas from all advanced art and design movements were explored, combined, and applied to the problems of functional design and machine production. © Kevin Woodland, 2020 Joost Schmidt, Exhibition Poster, 1923 GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE BAUHAUS / Art and TechnoLogy, A New Unity 4 / 70 1919–1933 The Bauhaus Twentieth-century furniture, architecture, product design, and graphics were shaped by the work of its faculty and students, and a modern design aesthetic emerged. MEGGS © Kevin Woodland, 2020 GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE BAUHAUS / Art and TechnoLogy, A New Unity 5 / 70 1919–1933 The Bauhaus Ideas from all advanced art and design movements were explored, combined, and applied to the problems of functional design and machine production. MEGGS • The Arts & Crafts: Applied arts, craftsmanship, workshops, apprenticeship • Art Nouveau: Removal of ornament, application of form • Futurism: Typographic freedom • Dadaism: Wit, spontaneity, theoretical exploration • Constructivism: Design for the greater good • De Stijl: Reduction, simplification, refinement © Kevin Woodland, 2020 GRAPHIC DESIGN HISTORY / THE BAUHAUS / Art and TechnoLogy, A New Unity 6 / 70 1919–1933
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. I am using the terms ‘space’ and ‘place’ in Michel de Certeau’s sense, in that ‘space is a practiced place’ (Certeau 1988: 117), and where, as Lefebvre puts it, ‘(Social) space is a (social) product’ (Lefebvre 1991: 26). Evelyn O’Malley has drawn my attention to the anthropocentric dangers of this theorisation, a problematic that I have not been able to deal with fully in this volume, although in Chapters 4 and 6 I begin to suggest a collaboration between human and non- human in the making of space. 2. I am extending the use of the term ‘ extra- daily’, which is more commonly associated with its use by theatre director Eugenio Barba to describe the per- former’s bodily behaviours, which are moved ‘away from daily techniques, creating a tension, a difference in potential, through which energy passes’ and ‘which appear to be based on the reality with which everyone is familiar, but which follow a logic which is not immediately recognisable’ (Barba and Savarese 1991: 18). 3. Architectural theorist Kenneth Frampton distinguishes between the ‘sceno- graphic’, which he considers ‘essentially representational’, and the ‘architec- tonic’ as the interpretation of the constructed form, in its relationship to place, referring ‘not only to the technical means of supporting the building, but also to the mythic reality of this structural achievement’ (Frampton 2007 [1987]: 375). He argues that postmodern architecture emphasises the scenographic over the architectonic and calls for new attention to the latter. However, in contemporary theatre production, this distinction does not always reflect the work of scenographers, so might prove reductive in this context.
    [Show full text]
  • Konturen V (2014) 3 Obrist / Worringer / Marc Abstraction and Empathy On
    Konturen V (2014) 3 Obrist / Worringer / Marc Abstraction and Empathy on the Eve of World War I William Sherwin Simmons University of Oregon This essay considers continuities between the impetus towards abstraction within Jugendstil and Expressionism. Both Hermann Obrist and Franz Marc sought through empathy to intuit and image abstract forces at work within the materiality of the organic and inorganic natural worlds. Their creative practice and theoretical writings share much with Wilhelm Worringer’s discussion of the “expressive abstraction” found in the Gothic style, which unified the organic with the abstract. This essay explores the trajectories of this visual and textual discourse, paying particular attention to their nexus during 1914 in Obrist’s monumental sculptures at the Werkbund Exhibition in Cologne and the development of Marc’s paintings over the course of that year. Sherwin Simmons is Professor Emeritus at the University of Oregon. He has published extensively on art and advertising, German Expressionism, and Berlin dada. He is author of the book Kasimir Malevich's Black Square and the Genesis of Suprematism (Garland, 1981). His most recent article is "Hands on the Table: Ernst Ludwig Kirchner and the Expressionist Still Life" in the February 2014 issue of Art History. During the summer of 1914 two monumental quasi-abstract sculptures created by Hermann Obrist stood on the grounds of the Deutscher Werkbund Exhibition across the Rhine River from downtown Cologne. Although neither has survived, they were located in courtyards to the sides of the theater that Henry van de Velde had designed for the exhibition (Figure 1). To the south was a limestone fountain that stood about twenty feet high (Figure 2); while Movement, a swirling pinnacle-like sculpture that also approached twenty feet in height, was to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • National Romanticism and Art Nouveau
    Lecture 3 National Romanticism and Art Nouveau Gustave Eiffel, Eiffel Tower, Paris, 1889 C.L. Dutert and Victor Contamin, Galeries des Machines, Paris Universal Exposition of 1889 1 Semper’s “Four Elements of Architecture” (the mound, the hearth, the roof, the wall) versus Marc Antoine Laugier’s theory of the “primitive hut” as the origin for a rationalist theory of architecture based on structure Wilhelm Bernatzik, Entrance to Paradise, Mistelbach bei Wien (Vienna), 1906 “Arlington Row” in Cotswold village of Bibury (17th c.); Webb’s Red House (1860); Voysey’s design for a cottage (1885); John Ruskin, decorated cusped Gothic window (1853) 2 E. W. Godwin, Brochure for “Art Furniture”, London, 1877 Hector Guimard, Castel Henriette, Sevres, 1899, with detail of window grate “Modern Interior,” 1878, as featured in Jacob von Falke, Die Kunst im Hause [trans. as Art in the Home] (Boston, 1879), plate 30 3 Late 19th-century buffet in the “modern baroque style,” 1880; E.W. Godwin, Sideboard of ebonized wood and Japanese leather paper, 1867 Anonymous, Study for Interior Elevation of a Room, Munich, 1900 Victor Horta, Tassel House, 1892-93 view of street facade 4 Façade detail Plan of ground floor and mezzanine Plan and view of entry & vestibule showing mosaic floors 5 Victor Horta Tassel House, Brussels, view back toward entrance from reception hall, with plan of ground floor Victor Horta, Tassel House, 1893-95, view of staircase Victor Horta, Tassel House, 1893-95, detail of staircase column, compared to ornamental ironwork of Viollet-le-Duc
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus Engl 01 13 LA Innen Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 1
    01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 1 Boris Friedewald Bauhaus Prestel Munich · London · New York 01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 2 01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 3 p. 9 Context “A ceremony of our own” p. 21 Fame Battles and Bestsellers p. 33 School The Laboratory of Modernism p. 83 Life Freedom, Celebration, and Arrests p. 105 Love Workshop of Emotions p. 117 Today The Bauhaus Myth 01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 4 Context 01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 5 “The main principle of the Bauhaus is the idea of a new unity; a gathering of art, styles, and appearances that forms an indivisible unit. A unit that is complete within its self and that generates its meaning only through animated life.” Walter Gropius, 1925 01_15_LA_RB_bauhaus_engl_01_13_LA_Innen_Dali Schwarz 12.02.16 12:11 Seite 6 Modernism’s Lines of Development The Bauhaus was unique, avant-garde, and pursued a path that led purpose- fully toward Modernism. Its members practiced an anti-academic education, had a concept of utopia and sought the mankind of the future, for whom they wanted to design according to need. Before the Bauhaus there had admittedly already been various reformist approaches to, and ideas on, education and art. But the Bauhaus was unique because it concentrated these aspirations and made them into reality. The Expressionist Bauhaus Many pieces of work by the students, but also by the masters, from the first years of the Bauhaus speak an Expressionist language and continue an artistic direction that came into being before the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whole World a Bauhaus*
    Magazine No 5 2019 / 2020 ZKM I Karlsruhe, Germany * Fritz Kuhr, 1928; student at the Bauhaus from 1923–27, member of staff in the wallpainting workshop 1928–29, teacher of drawing 1929–30 at the Bauhaus THE WHOLE WORLD A BAUHAUS* László Moholy-Nagy In the 1921 Weimar Bauhaus programme experiments with photography without Walter Gropius announced the creation of Painter, photographer, typographer, a camera (photograms). The book stage designer, art theorist and teacher a total work of art: “The Bauhaus strives for Painting Photography Film (1925) set 20 July 1895 in Bácsborsód / Austria- out his theory of “new seeing.” From a unity of all artistic creation, the reunification Hungary – 24 November 1946 in 1928 he was back in Berlin, designing of all the art disciplines – sculpture, painting, Chicago / USA intermedial decorations for the Kroll Opera and the Piscator Stage. the crafts and trades – to form a new art In painting, he experimented with of building in which they are all indispensable Born in southern Hungary as the son materials like aluminum and Bakelite of the Jewish farmer Lipot Weisz, components. The final, if distant goal of the and used Plexiglas placed in front of Moholy-Nagy – the later pioneer of canvases to create transparent three- Bauhaus is the unified work of art – the grand modernism – was raised by his uncle dimensional effects. His experiments building – in which there are no borders in Mohol in today’s Serbia. After led to the construction of a mobile his father left the family, his mother installation made of glass and metal, between monumental and decorative art.” (…) was helped by her lawyer, named the Room Modulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Van De Velde Year in Germany and Belgium: Part Two
    Jane Van Nimmen Henry van de Velde Year in Germany and Belgium: Part Two Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 13, no. 1 (Spring 2014) Citation: Jane Van Nimmen, “Henry van de Velde Year in Germany and Belgium: Part Two,” Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 13, no. 1 (Spring 2014), http://www.19thc- artworldwide.org/spring14/van-nimmen-reviews-henry-van-de-velde-year-in-germany-and- belgium-part-two. Published by: Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art. Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. Nimmen: Henry van de Velde Year in Germany and Belgium: Part Two Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 13, no. 1 (Spring 2014) Henry van de Velde Year 2013 in Germany and Belgium: Part Two During the summer of 2012, the Klassik Stiftung Weimar acquired Hohe Pappeln (1907–8), the second of four houses built by the Belgian architect and designer Henry van de Velde for his family. After years of cooperating with various owners, then renting the property on the outskirts of the city, the Klassik Stiftung Weimar was able to purchase the historic residence with the support of the Ilse Burghardt Foundation. Hohe Pappeln was given its name by Thyl, van de Velde’s only son. He and his twin sister Thylla were four years old in 1908 when they moved with their parents and three older sisters into the “house under the tall poplars”; the voices of the five van de Velde children still seem to echo in the garden (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BAUHAUS / Overview I / Lv
    GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS / OVerVIew I / LV The Bauhaus 1 Art and Technology, A New Unity 1 2 Origins 11 3 Weimar 30 4 Dessau 42 5 Berlin 53 © Kevin Woodland, 2019 GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS / OVerVIew II / LV © Kevin Woodland, 2019 GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS 1 / 55 1919–1933 Art and Technology, A New Unity A German design school where ideas from all advanced art and design movements were explored, combined, and applied to the problems of functional design and machine production. © Kevin Woodland, 2019 Joost Schmidt, Exhibition Poster, 1923 GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS / The Bauhaus 2 / 55 1919–1933 The Bauhaus Twentieth-century furniture, architecture, product design, and graphics were shaped by the work of its faculty and students, and a modern design aesthetic emerged. – MEGGS © Kevin Woodland, 2019 · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS / The Bauhaus 3 / 55 1919–1933 The Bauhaus Ideas from all advanced art and design movements were explored, combined, and applied to the problems of functional design and machine production. • The Arts & Crafts: Applied arts, craftsmanship, workshops, apprenticeship • Art Nouveau: Removal of ornament, application of form • Futurism: Typographic freedom • Dadaism: Wit, spontaneity, theoretical exploration • Constructivism: Design for the greater good • De Stijl: Reduction, simplification, refinement © Kevin Woodland, 2019 · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / THE BAUHAUS / The Bauhaus 4 / 55 1919–1933
    [Show full text]
  • August Endell's Construction of Feeling Martina Mims
    August Endell's Construction of Feeling Martina Mims Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 Copyright © 2013 Martina Mims All rights reserved ABSTRACT August Endell's Construction of Feeling Martina Mims The German architect August Endell (1871-1925) is best known for his idiosyncratic buildings and interiors. As the first monographic study on his work in English, this dissertation uncovers the little-known design philosophy behind his works, and elucidates the intellectual origins and career of his important theory of experiential form. Endell was a polymath versed in scientific philosophy, empirical psychology, musicology and architecture. A man of extraordinary intellectual range, he saw his architectural practice as a laboratory for conducting experiments in psychology. In particular, his buildings explored architectural forms patterned on the workings of the human brain, as understood in late nineteenth century Germany. Previous studies of Endell generally have tried to situate him within one of the maJor German schools of thought in psychology, alternatively as a proponent of abstraction or empathy. Through detailed analyses of his built works and written texts, this dissertation argues that Endell was in fact attempting a reconciliation between abstraction and empathy, through what I have interpreted as experiential forms, namely forms drawn from collective memories, feelings, and ethical relations. Endell was an activist for architectural design driven by a "science" of consciousness, and he was convinced that built experiential forms could serve an important unifying social function, counteracting processes of social disaggregation he believed was taking place in pre-World War I Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • He History of Oriental Art by Dennis Hartman Ehow Contributor
    he History of Oriental Art By Dennis Hartman eHow Contributor Pin Share Tweet Share Email Hiart, wikimedia.org Oriental art is one of the major branches of art classification, along with European art, art of the Americas, African art and Middle Eastern art. The development or distinct artistic styles in Japan, China and other eastern Asian nations has influenced art around the world for thousands of years, and reveals a great deal about the cultures that produced it. Other People Are Reading Facts About Asian Art The History of Oriental Floral Design Japan Some of the first significant art to emerge from Japan dates to the seventh century. Japanese artists came to know the styles of Chinese and Korean art as the cultures shared their Buddhist beliefs, and Japanese art from this era is a fusion of Korean and Chinese. Bronze sculpture dominates Japanese art from the Asuka and Nara periods (roughly the years 550 to 780). Buddhism continued to dominate Japanese artistic subject matter until 1180, when widespread war within Japan changed the national mood from one of religious introspection to one of conflict and survival, and Samurai culture was born. In creating war-themed art, Japanese artists adopted a new realism in their work. Calligraphy also emerged as an art form during this time. By the Muromachi era (1338 to 1573), Japanese art looked back to its roots in spirituality. Japanese painting and printmaking flourished during this period, with subjects ranging from the natural world to ancient mythology. China Long before Japan was first settles, early cultures produced primitive art in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Art, Decoration, and the Texture of Modern Experience: the Interior Before 1900
    Art, Decoration, and the Texture of Modern Experience: The Interior Before 1900 by Alexandra E. Fraser A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History of Art) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Alexander D. Potts, Chair Professor Michèle A. Hannoosh Associate Professor Howard G. Lay Professor Susan L. Siegfried Associate Professor Claire A. Zimmerman Alexandra E. Fraser [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6969-1004 © Alexandra E. Fraser 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation was completed with support from many friends, colleagues, family members, academic mentors, and institutions to whom I am profoundly grateful. It is a pleasure to begin by thanking my advisor, Alex Potts, whose intellectual dexterity and generosity of thought cannot be overstated. His tireless commitment to seeing this project through, and unfailing ability to find both humor and critical interest in unexplored corners of the field, remained a touchstone for me at every stage. I am deeply grateful for the experience of his mentorship. My debt to him is unlimited. Each member of my dissertation committee was influential in shaping my own way of seeing, and my approach to this material. Susan Siegfried and Michèle Hannoosh were instrumental in getting this project off the ground. Their incisive feedback, productive challenges, and encouragement at key junctures have resulted in a more multifaceted final product. I am also grateful for their individual commitments to fostering a vibrant culture of dix- neuvièmistes at the University of Michigan, a remarkable community that has genuinely shaped the character of my work and the nature of my thought.
    [Show full text]