DOCSLIB.ORG

High Altitude Airship Station-Keeping Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Altitude Airship Station-Keeping Analysis Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 6-2006 High Altitude Airship Station-Keeping Analysis Douglas P. Kondrack Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Kondrack, Douglas P., "High Altitude Airship Station-Keeping Analysis" (2006). Theses and Dissertations. 3615. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/3615 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HIGH ALTITUDE AIRSHIP STATION-KEEPING ANALYSIS THESIS Douglas P. Kondrack, Ensign, USN AFIT/GAE/ENY/06-J07 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. AFIT/GAE/ENY/06-J07 HIGH ALTITUDE AIRSHIP STATION-KEEPING ANALYSIS THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautical Engineering Douglas P. Kondrack, BS Ensign, USN June 2006 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my faculty advisors, Dr. Richard Cobb and Lt Col Eric J. Stephen, for their guidance and support throughout the course of this thesis effort. Their insight and experience was certainly appreciated. I would also like to thank my spouse for both the support and latitude provided to me in this endeavor. Douglas P. Kondrack iv Table of Contents Page Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................v List of Figures................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xi Abstract............................................................................................................................ xii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................1 1.1 Motivation............................................................................................................1 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................2 1.3 Research Objectives/Questions..........................................................................3 1.4 Methodology Overview.......................................................................................4 1.5 Assumptions/Limitations....................................................................................5 1.6 Implications .........................................................................................................6 1.7 Thesis Overview ..................................................................................................6 2 Literature Review.......................................................................................................7 2.1 Chapter Overview...............................................................................................7 2.2 Historic US airship applications........................................................................7 2.2.1 Three Principle Airship Designs.............................................................. 9 2.2.1.1 Rigid Airships........................................................................................ 9 2.2.1.2 Non-rigid Airships .............................................................................. 10 2.2.1.3 Semi-rigid Airships ............................................................................. 11 2.2.2 US Military Airships............................................................................... 12 2.2.2.1 Rigid US Navy Airships...................................................................... 12 2.2.2.1.1 USS Shenandoah ........................................................................... 13 2.2.2.1.2 R-38 ................................................................................................ 14 2.2.2.1.3 USS Los Angeles............................................................................ 15 2.2.2.1.4 USS Akron ..................................................................................... 16 2.2.2.1.5 USS Macon .................................................................................... 17 v 2.2.2.2 Non-rigid US Navy Airships .............................................................. 18 2.2.2.2.1 Type K Non-rigid .......................................................................... 19 2.2.2.2.2 Type M Non-rigid ......................................................................... 20 2.2.2.2.3 Type ZPG Non-rigid..................................................................... 21 2.2.3 US Military Airship Operations ............................................................ 22 2.3 Future Airship Development ...........................................................................24 2.3.1 Lockheed Martin’s High Altitude Airship ........................................... 24 2.3.1.1 High Altitude Airship Mission........................................................... 25 2.4 High Altitude Wind...........................................................................................26 2.4.1 Temperature Gradient With Respect to Altitude................................ 27 2.4.2 East Wind and West Wind Crossover .................................................. 31 2.5 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................36 3 Methodology..............................................................................................................37 3.1 Chapter Overview.............................................................................................37 3.2 Airship Mission Description ............................................................................37 3.2.1 Ground Footprint.................................................................................... 38 3.3 Baseline Airship Design....................................................................................42 3.3.1 Design Criteria ........................................................................................ 43 3.3.2 Airship #1 (AS #1)................................................................................... 48 3.3.3 Airship #2 (AS #2)................................................................................... 51 3.4 Weather Models ................................................................................................53 3.4.1 Site Specific Upper Air Climatology (SSUAC) .................................... 53 3.4.2 1.0 Degree Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS) ........................................................................................................... 56 3.5 Station-keeping Mission Analysis....................................................................60 3.6 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................67 4 Analysis and Results.................................................................................................68 4.1 Chapter Overview.............................................................................................68 vi 4.2 Airship #1 Station-keeping Mission Results...................................................68 4.2.1 Winter ...................................................................................................... 69 4.2.2 Spring....................................................................................................... 71 4.2.3 Summer.................................................................................................... 74 4.2.4 Fall............................................................................................................ 76 4.2.5 Airship #1 Mission Summary ................................................................ 79 4.3 Airship #2 Station-keeping Mission Results...................................................79 4.3.1 Winter ...................................................................................................... 80 4.3.2 Spring....................................................................................................... 82 4.3.3 Summer.................................................................................................... 85 4.3.4 Fall............................................................................................................ 88 4.3.5 Airship #2 Mission Summary ................................................................ 91 4.4 NOGAPS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY Goodyear is one of the world’s leading tire companies, with one of the most recognizable brand names. It develops, manufactures, markets and distributes tires for most applications and manufactures and markets rubber-related chemicals for various uses. The company also has established itself as a leader in providing services, tools, analytics and products for evolving modes of transportation, including electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles and fleets of shared and connected consumer vehicles. Goodyear was the first major tire manufacturer to offer direct-to-consumer tire sales on-line and offers a proprietary service and maintenance platform for fleets of shared passenger vehicles. Within its global retail presence, Goodyear operates approximately 1,000 company-owned outlets around the world where it offers its products for sale to consumer and commercial customers and provides repair and other services. It is one of the world’s largest operators of commercial truck service and tire retreading centers and offers a leading service and maintenance platform for commercial fleets. Goodyear is annually recognized as a top place to work and is guided by its corporate responsibility framework, Goodyear Better Future, which articulates the company’s commitment to sustainability. The company manufactures its products in 46 facilities in 21 countries and has operations in most regions of the world. Its two Innovation Centers in Akron, Ohio, and Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg, strive to develop state-of-the-art products and services that set the technology and performance standard for the industry. THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 200 Innovation Way Akron, Ohio 44316-0001 www.goodyear.com ON THE COVER Top: In 2020, Goodyear became the first tire manufacturer to install a dynamic driving simulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindenburg: Last of The1 2 Gtaihi
    www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org Table of Contents Slide/s Part Description 1N/ATitle 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~96 1 Exceeding the Grasp 97~184 2 Biggest Birds That Ever Flew 185~281 3 Triumph and Tragedy 282~354 4 Made in America 355~444 5 The Future is Now 445~541 6 LZ-129 542~594 7 Flight Operations 595~646 8 Magic Carpet Ride 647~759 9 Oh, The Humanity! 760~800 10 Back to the Future Hindenburg: Last of the1 2 GtAihi Part 1 “Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or what’s a heaven for?”for? Robert Browning, Poet Exceeding the Grasp 3 4 “...as by certain mechanical art and power to fly; The Dreams of Inventors so nicely was it balanced by weights and put in motion by hidden and enclosed air” Archytas of Tarentura, 400 B.C. 5 6 © J.M. Syken 1 www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org “…Then we are told of a monk who attempted a flight with wings from the top of a tower in Spain. He broke his legs, and wasafterwardburnedasasorcerer. Another similar trial was made from St. Mark’s steeple in Venice; another in Nuremberg;andsoonԝ - legs or arms were usually broken, occasionally a neck. In the sixteenth century we read of a certain Italian who went to the court of James IV of Scotland, and attempted to fly from the walls of Sterling Castle to France. His thig h was bkbroken; btbut,asareasonfor the failure, he asserted that some of the feathers used in constructing his wings “…Many other trials have there been of the same character.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes
    City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Meeting Minutes Friday, September 4, 2009 10:00 AM SPECIAL MEETING City Hall Commission Chambers City Commission Manuel A. Diaz, Mayor Joe Sanchez, Chair Michelle Spence-Jones, Vice-Chair Angel González, Commissioner District One Marc David Sarnoff, Commissioner District Two Tomas Regalado, Commissioner District Four Pedro G. Hernandez, City Manager Julie O Bru, City Attorney Priscilla A. Thompson, City Clerk City Commission Meeting Minutes September 4, 2009 10:00 A.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Commissioner González, Commissioner Sarnoff, Chair Sanchez, Commissioner Regalado and Vice Chair Spence-Jones On the 4th day of September 2009, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, met at its regular meeting place in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, in special session. The meeting was called to order by Chair Sanchez at 10:38 a.m., recessed at 1:11 p.m., reconvened at 2:24 p.m., and adjourned at 6:18 p.m. Note for the Record: Commissioner Gonzalez entered the Commission chambers at 10:46 a.m. Note for the Record: Vice Chair Spence-Jones entered the Commission chambers at 2:37 p.m. ALSO PRESENT: Pedro G. Hernandez, City Manager Julie O. Bru, City Attorney Priscilla A. Thompson, City Clerk Order of the Day SP.1 06-02095 ORDINANCE First Reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MIAMI TO ADOPT A NEW ZONING CODE TO BE KNOWN AS THE "MIAMI 21 CODE", INCLUDING DEFINITIONS, GENERAL PROVISIONS WHICH ALSO INCLUDE THE ADOPTION OF THE MIAMI 21 ATLAS FOR THE ENTIRE CITY OF MIAMI, REGULATIONS GENERAL TO ZONES, STANDARDS AND TABLES, REGULATIONS SPECIFIC TO ZONES, SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, PROCEDURES AND NONCONFORMITIES, AND THOROUGHFARE GUIDELINES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • “The USS Akron Tragedy”
    “The USS Akron Tragedy” I just hung on. I saw the other fellows fall and it didn’t make me feel any too good, but there was nothing I could do about it—‘ceptin’ to hang on tighter. I wouldn’t do it again for love or money. --Navy Apprentice Seaman C. M. Cowart, May 12, 1932 Since the early 1900s, the U.S. military had been fascinated with the potential of lighter-than-air aircraft. Between the world wars, U.S. Navy built several huge, helium-filled airships. But despite years of experience in airship construction, the dirigibles were risky to fly and often dangerous to land. San Diego would be the scene of a landing tragedy in May 1932. The USS Akron was launched on August 8, 1931, after a christening by the president’s wife, Mrs. Herbert Hoover, at the Goodyear-Zeppelin plant in Akron, Ohio. At 785 feet long and 152 feet tall, the steel-framed Akron was the biggest helium-filled airship ever built. Only the German- built, hydrogen-filled Hindenburg was larger. Called the “Queen of the Skies,” the Akron was flying warship, protected by seven machine guns, and carrying a crew of 89 naval officers and men. Along with her sister ship, the USS Macon, the Akron was designed for reconnaissance--to be the “eyes” of the Pacific fleet. The Akron was also built as a flying aircraft carrier. A remarkable inboard aircraft hanger carried two Sparrowhawk reconnaissance biplanes. The airplanes could be lowered from the dirigible by a “flying trapeze” and then launched into the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Garland Fulton Collection
    Garland Fulton Collection Allan Janus 2003 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Personal Files, Correspondence, Fulton's Writings.................................. 5 Series 2: Lighter Than Air (LTA).............................................................................. 7 Series 3: Aeronautics, General.............................................................................. 17 Series 4: Publications, Papers, Reports, Journals................................................. 19 Series 5: US Navy, general...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Goodyear – Civilian Blimps
    Goodyear – civilian blimps Peter Lobner, 24 August 2021 1. Introduction Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company began their involvement with lighter-than-air (LTA) vehicles in 1912, when the company developed a fabric envelope suitable for use in airships and aerostats. The first blimps manufactured by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company were B-Type blimps ordered by the US Navy in 1917 for convoy escort duty. Goodyear (envelope supplier) and Curtiss Aeroplane (gondola supplier) produced 9 of the 17 B-Type blimps ordered. Goodyear also supplied the envelopes for some of the Navy’s 10 C-Type patrol blimps, which were delivered in 1918, after the end of WW I. Both the B- and C-Type blimps used hydrogen as the lift gas. In 1923, Goodyear teamed with German firm Luftschiffbau Zeppelin and created a new subsidiary, Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation. In June 1925, their Type AD Pilgrim (NC-9A) made its first flight and became Goodyear’s first blimp to use helium lift gas. Pilgrim was certified later in 1925, becoming the first US commercial airship. Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation filed a patent application for a nonrigid airship in September 1929, describing the objectives of their invention as follows: “This invention relates to non-rigid airships, and it has particular relation to the suspension of pilot cars or gondolas from the envelopes of non-rigid airships. The principal object of the invention is to provide a non-rigid airship in which the envelope and the pilot car or engine car are so constructed as to offer the minimum air resistance. Another object of the invention is to provide connections between the envelope and pilot car that are not exposed to the airstream for sustaining the weight of the pilot car, as well as stabilizing it against lateral or longitudinal movement.” 1 In patent Figure 1, the pressurized lift gas envelope (10) contains an air ballonet (12, for adjusting airship buoyancy) and a load suspension system for carrying and distributing the weight of the gondola (11) affixed under the envelope and the thrust loads from the with attached engines.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Titel 18 10 29 Ohne Verlag.Indd
    Roland Fuhrmann Dresdens Tor zum Himmel Die erste aerodynamisch geformte Luftschiffhalle und ihr Einfluss auf die Baugeschichte Impressum Dresdens Tor zum Himmel – Die erste aerodynamisch geformte Luftschiffhalle und ihr Einfluss auf die Baugeschichte Titel in Englisch: Dresden’s gateway to the skies: the world’s first streamlined airship hangar and its influence on architectural history Diese Publikation beruht auf der Dissertation gleichen Titels, die der Verfasser Roland Fuhrmann am 19. Juli 2018 an der Fakultät Architektur, Lehrstuhl für Bau- geschichte der Technischen Universität Dresden zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.) erfolgreich verteidigt hat. Die Arbeit wurde mit dem Kurt-Beyer-Preis 2018 ausgezeichnet. © 2019 by THELEM Universitätsverlag und Buchhandlung GmbH und Co. KG, Dresden www.thelem.de ISBN 978-3-95908-482-6 Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind über http://d-nb.de abrufbar. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk einschließlich seiner Teile ist urheberrecht- lich geschützt. Die Verwendung von Text und Bildern, auch auszugsweise, ist ohne schriftliche Zustimmung der Rechteinhaber urheberrechtswidrig und strafbar. Dies gilt insbesondere für die Digitalisierung, Vervielfältigung, Übersetzung oder die Ver- wendung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Gestaltung/Bildbearbeitung: Roland Fuhrmann Gedruckt in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Einbandabbildungen: Toransicht und Torlager der Luftschiffhalle Dresden, 1913 Cyanotypien, angefertigt von der Steffens & Nölle A.G., Berlin-Tempelhof: PA www.luftschiffhalle.de Kurzfassung Abstract Die 1913 errichtete städtische Luftschiffhalle Dresden ist die erste aero- The Dresden municipal airship hangar built in 1913 is the first aerody- dynamisch günstig geformte Luftschiffhalle überhaupt und der Archetyp namic airship hangar of its kind and an archetypal design for all subse- aller nachfolgend strömungsoptimierten Luftschiffhallen.
    [Show full text]
  • November/December 2017
    Volume 33 Issue 5 November/December 2017 Congratulations 2017 Award Winners! The 2017 winners of the Ohio Local History Alliance’s Outstanding Achievement Awards pose after the Awards Luncheon at the Annual Meeting. Photo courtesy of the Ohio History Connection. By Jim Geyer, Director of Museums, Muskingum County History and OLHA Region 10 WHAT’S INSIDE: Representative ince 1960, the Ohio Local History Alliance, in partnership with the Ohio 2 President’s Message History Connection, has led the state in recognizing excellent projects, 3 2017 Award Winners programs, and publications produced by Ohio historical societies, museums, (con't) libraries, and related organizations. In addition, the Alliance is proud to Srecognize individuals who have made significant contributions in preserving local 5 Advocacy | On the Web history and heritage. This year the Alliance board presented twenty Outstanding 6 Local History + The Achievement Awards at the Annual Meeting in Dublin. These awards recognize History Fund: Denison exceptional projects and people that have made an impact inspiring, connecting, and Railroad Depot Museum educating audiences throughout Ohio. 8 Book Review: How to Complete the Ohio INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS Historic Inventory by Individual Achievement Awards recognize people who have made outstanding contri- Stephen C. Gordon butions to Ohio’s historical societies or history museums or to the understanding and 9 Announcements appreciation of state or local history. 13 News from the Theresa Rayner Regions Noble County Historical Society 14 Calendar For many years Theresa Rayner has been involved in preserving and protecting the his- tory of the USS Shenandoah airship, which crashed in Noble County, Ohio, on Septem- 15 New & Renewing ber 3, 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • K J__I Year Factories, Which Are Busily Pewa of This Week
    THF WTNereQT ClAN = AKRON EDITION = PROTECT OUR GOOD NAME Vol. 30 AKRON, OHIO, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 1941 No. 12 Earn Vacation Money and Help Defense by Turning In Suggestions to Cut Waste TWENTY-YEAR Miss Biddle Win WOMEN FOUND CLUB OUTING Another Goodyear Ship For U. S. Be Bride June 21 SUPERIOR IN Marguerite Biddle, sales and ON JUNE 22 office personnel, will end service SPECIAL LINES of 15 years at Goodyear by be- Meeting Thursday Night coming a bride, Have Very Important Role she and Lorenz _M____k_____k Will Discuss Plans Brimlow of Se- At Goodyear in Exten- For Big Event bring to have _m sive Program the nuptial knot tied on Satur- "We are looking forwardto a day, June 21. That women have an impor- grand time on Sunday, June 22, Marguerite will tant role in the national defense our Twenty- program is no better exempli- when we will hold —_____.. '~^__ leave the com- anywhere in the Year Club basket picnic at Chip- U.S. NAVY L~3 pany on Friday fied than Good- J_.ake Park," said R. C. __k _J__I year factories, which are busily pewa of this week. engaged in manufacturing air- Griffith, club president, yester- A few nights day. ships, barrage balloons, air- ago about sixty plane flotation bags, gas masks, girl Marguerite Biddle mAtmWe plan to have several new of her life rafts, tank tracks, etc., for Bs injected into our program, friends gave the the shower, armed forces of the United mWinnovations to be of the type bride-elect a and the States.
    [Show full text]
  • Blimp by Sharon Nittinger T Fly? Fly? Fly? Fly? T T T T I I Es Es O O D D HOW HOW Fly? Fly? T T I I Es Es O O D D D D HOW HOW HOW HOW HOW D HOW
    HOW DOES IT FLY? HOW DOES IT FLY? D HOW C S O N M O M I O T FLY? T U I C ES N E I N T Y N • O C ES I T FLY? HOW D HOW T FLY? O O T FLY? HOW D HOW T FLY? I ES ES HOW DOES IT FLY? I T FLY? O BLIMP BY SHARON NITTINGER T FLY? FLY? FLY? FLY? T T T T I I ES ES O O D D HOW HOW FLY? FLY? T T I I ES ES O O D D D D HOW HOW HOW HOW HOW D HOW Blimp.indd 1 5/19/11 5:05 PM Published in the United States of America by Cherry Lake Publishing Ann Arbor, Michigan www.cherrylakepublishing.com Content Adviser: Jacob Zeiger, Production Support Engineer, the Boeing Company Special thanks to Rob Delagrange, Goodyear blimp pilot, for sharing his time, knowledge, and support in the writing of this book. Photo Credits: Cover and pages 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 21, Photos courtesy of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; page 15, ©First Light/Alamy; page 17, ©Kenneth Summers/Shutterstock, Inc.; page 19, ©Kenneth Sponsler/Shutterstock, Inc. Copyright ©2012 by Cherry Lake Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Nittinger, Sharon, 1966– How does it fly? Blimp/by Sharon Nittinger. p. cm.—(Community connections) Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to The
    Guide to the Clara Adams Papers Addition 1884-1971 Date Range: 1913-1940 Bulk Dates: 1936-1939 2.2 Linear Feet Accession Number: 1-07 Collection Number: H1-07 Prepared by Paul A. Oelkrug, C. A. CITATION: Clara Adams Papers Addition, Document name/type, Folder number, Box number, Series number, History of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Department The University of Texas at Dallas Table of Contents Biographical Sketch ........................................................................................................ 1 Sources ........................................................................................................................ 2 Additional Sources ...................................................................................................... 2 Series Description ........................................................................................................... 3 Series I. Documents, 1913-1933. 5 Folders. ............................................................... 3 Series II. Newspaper Clippings, 1919-1929. 1 Folder. ............................................... 3 Series III. Ephemera. 9 Folders. ................................................................................. 3 Series IV. Artifacts. 1 Folder. .................................................................................... 3 Series V. Images. 1.8 Linear Feet. ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parasite Fighters Parasite Aircraft – Are There to Enhance the Task of the Parent – That Continues with Its Own Mission – Which May Be Only to Be a Mother Ship
    Parasite Fighters Parasite aircraft – are there to enhance the task of the parent – that continues with its own mission – which may be only to be a mother ship. Composite Aircraft – the part that detaches then completes the mission. (Not to be confused with more modern usage of composite construction – of different materials.) The Short-Mayo composite project, co-designed by Mayo and Shorts chief designer Arthur Gouge, comprised the Short S.21 Maia,(G-ADHK) which was a variant of the Short "C-Class" Empire flying-boat fitted with a trestle or pylon on the top of the fuselage to support the Short S.20 Mercury(G-ADHJ). Established a record flight for a seaplane of 6,045 miles (9,728 km) from Scotland to South Africa Composite Larger aircraft are commonly thought to be at risk from attacking fighters. One way of defence has often been considered – a fighter that rides along hitched to the parent aircraft – which can detach while airborne and defend the larger aircraft and perhaps re-attach in flight. Other missions for parasites have included reconnaissance and ground attack. Here I an concentrating on manned aircraft. Before the 2nd World War the Russians and after the war the Americans, experimented with parasite aircraft on aircraft In 1916 a Felixstowe Porte Baby was used to prove the concept of a larger aircraft carrying aloft and launching a lighter aircraft (in this case a Bristol Scout fighter). Airships carrying Aircraft Airship Aircraft Country Date Status Description Also tested glider L 35/LZ 80 Albatros D.III Germany February
    [Show full text]