DOCSLIB.ORG

Eindversie Dissertation an Ravelingien

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eindversie Dissertation an Ravelingien FACULTY OF ARTS AND PHILOSOPHY PIG TALES, HUMAN CHIMERAS AND MAN-MADE PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARDS AN ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF XENOTRANSPLANT BENEFITS AND RISKS by AN RAVELINGIEN DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT GHENT UNIVERSITY (June, 2006) SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISORS Prof. Dr. JOHAN BRAECKMAN Prof. Dr. ILSE KERREMANS Prof. Dr. ERIC MORTIER Prof. Dr. FREDDY MORTIER {Title page: The illustration is an adaptation of the embryo drawings drawn by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 for his Recapitulation Theory} Acknowledgements The process of writing this dissertation has been nothing short of a growing experience. It has allowed for a gradual transition from student life to ‘reality’, while giving me the opportunity to further extend the roots of my education and main interests. I want to thank the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research for the financial support of this research project, which has introduced me to new ideas, new people and new parts of the world. Of course, there would not have been a project had Johan Braeckman not encouraged me to apply for a grant to begin with. Johan has witnessed my ‘growth process’ (as well as the growing pains that have accompanied it) and I am deeply indebted to him for his active belief in my work as well as for the continuous support, encouragement and constructive criticism. It seems that nothing was too much to ask him. Despite his busy schedule, he never resisted reading, rereading and commenting on my papers. His dedication to ethics and philosophy is sincere, inspiring and fun (indeed, what would philosophy be without Cosmo Kramer?). Johan has given me advice on just about anything you could ever possibly need advice on, and for that, I consider him a mentor and a dear friend. I am also extremely grateful to the other supervisors of this project. Ilse Kerremans’ experiences as a transplant surgeon made the urgency of dealing with the organ shortage more tangible for me. I admire her courage to fight death on a daily basis. The same respect is due to Eric Mortier. His expertise as an anaesthesiologist and his genuine interest in philosophy allowed for fascinating discussions on the meaning and definition of death. I also appreciate the support of Freddy Mortier. His activities as our dean are demanding. Nonetheless, he has always taken the time to discuss the progress of my work, which provided some valuable insights and observations. I am especially grateful towards David Cooper, who has been receiving emails from me during the past three and a half years. He is a renowned scientist and pioneer in xenotransplantation, and takes a leading role in thinking about and acting upon the ethical and social implications of this emerging biotechnology. I am honoured that he is willing to judge my work. I also want to acknowledge the many colleagues who have helped me develop some of the thoughts expressed in this dissertation. I thank Gunter Bombaerts, Charlotte De Backer, Jelle De Schrijver, Farah Focquaert, Koen Margodt, Karolien Poels, Tom Speelman, Griet Vandermassen and Thomas Vervisch for the cake and discussions during sporadic meetings of the Braeckie Basement Team. Special thanks to Koen Margodt and Frank Mertens for i sharing some of their material, which was useful in two papers. Thanks also to Tom Claes, Guido Pennings, Sigrid Sterckx and Ann Van Soom for their generous advice on the outline of this research. A very warm thank you to the colleagues and friends that have volunteered their time to read, correct and comment on some of the texts during the final stages of writing: Charlotte, Griet, Katrien Devolder, Melinda Frank, Nell Grillaert, Mike Legge, Malcolm McGinn, Kevin McMullan, Jeroen Moernaut, Els Ravelingien and Linda Scobie. I am indebted to Anja Demeulenaere for administrative and practical support and to Katia Brys for her professional support in proofreading and layout. My encounters abroad have been very instructive as well. I am grateful to Arthur Caplan, Sheldon Zink and the assistant researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Bioethics Center for the fruitful discussions and access to their library and documentation. Special thanks to Renée Fox for sharing her 55 years of intriguing experience in transplantation sociology and bioethics with me. Thanks also to Grant Gillett, Donald Evans, Mike King and Claire Gallop for discussing some of my papers and allowing me to attend the Medical Ethics courses at the Otago University Bioethics Centre. I have also had a brief introduction in Australian philosophy. I am extremely grateful to Robert Sparrow and Neil Levy for making my stay at Monash and Melbourne University possible and so thoroughly enjoyable. Along with them, I thank Steven Curry, Heather Draper and Janna Thompson for the constructive criticism of some of the arguments presented in this thesis. I have also learned a great deal from meetings with members of the World Transhumanist Association and the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Particular thanks to Nik Bostrom, James Hughes, Giulio Prisco and Martine Rothblatt for the thought-provoking conversations. Of course, these past years would not have been as gratifying without the enduring support and interest from my friends and family. I want to thank all my friends for sharing my ups and downs and for reminding me that my life is much more than the ‘D-word’. A sincere thanks to my parents, Els and Pascal, Nies, William and Michael for their continuous encouragements, even during the past months when I was largely absent from family gatherings. The process of my research has coincided with the development of a fantastic relationship, and I really cannot separate the one from the other. Looking back on these past three years, I realize how actively Vincent (who also designed the title page, by the way) has taken part in my studies and how difficult it would have been without him. While it is true that the more you learn, the less you know, I know that I can be certain about us. ii Table of contents GENERAL INTRODUCTION 0. General introduction: definition, objective and scope ...............................................1 0.1 Xenotransplantation definition .........................................................................1 0.2 Why xenotransplantation? ................................................................................2 0.3 Xenotransplantation ethics ..............................................................................3 0.4 Research objectives and outline .......................................................................5 References ......................................................................................................9 PART ONE: ESTABLISHING THE NEED FOR XENOTRANSPLANTATION 1 Transplantation medicine: evaluating its success ..................................................... 11 1.1 The shortage of human organs: a 'formulaic' presentation ................................... 12 1.2 Policies to augment the human donor pool: an overview ..................................... 13 1.2.1 Instrumental revisions of the ‘dead donor rule’ ........................................... 13 1.2.2 Augmenting the consent rate for cadaveric donation .................................... 16 1.2.3 Optimising living donor utility .................................................................. 20 1.2.4 Optimising cadaveric donor utility ............................................................. 22 1.3 Transplantation: saving lives, the quality of life and health care expenses ............ 23 References .................................................................................................... 28 2 The ethics of organ allocation: frustrations in the face of finitude ............................. 35 2.1 A right to transplantation? ............................................................................. 36 2.2 ‘Right’ and ‘wrong’ in distributing the right to transplantation ............................ 39 2.3 Earning points for moral behaviour .................................................................. 40 2.3.1 Proposal outline ..................................................................................... 41 2.3.2 Discussion ............................................................................................. 44 2.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 50 References .................................................................................................... 51 3 Organs galore: an overview of emerging alternatives to the donation model ................ 54 3.1 Not enough deaths to save the dying ............................................................... 55 3.2 Maximizing living ‘donation’: commercialized transplantation ............................. 56 3.2.1 Transplant tourism ................................................................................. 56 3.2.2 Arguments against commercialization ........................................................ 57 3.2.3 Arguments in defence of commercialization ............................................... 58 3.2.4 Reality check: an illustration from Iran ...................................................... 61 3.3 Artificial organs and support devices ............................................................... 63 3.3.1 Artificial kidney and dialysis ..................................................................... 63 3.3.2 Liver support systems .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of the First Kidney Transplantation
    165+3 14 mm "Service to society is the rent we pay for living on this planet" The History of the Joseph E. Murray, 1990 Nobel-laureate who performed the first long-term functioning kidney transplantation in the world First Kidney "The pioneers sacrificed their scientific life to convince the medical society that this will become sooner or later a successful procedure… – …it is a feeling – now I am Transplantation going to overdo - like taking part in creation...” András Németh, who performed the first – a European Overview Hungarian renal transplantation in 1962 E d i t e d b y : "Professor Langer contributes an outstanding “service” to the field by a detailed Robert Langer recording of the history of kidney transplantation as developed throughout Europe. The authoritative information is assembled country by country by a generation of transplant professionals who knew the work of their pioneer predecessors. The accounting as compiled by Professor Langer becomes an essential and exceptional reference document that conveys the “service to society” that kidney transplantation has provided for all mankind and that Dr. Murray urged be done.” Francis L. Delmonico, M.D. Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Past President The Transplantation Society and the Organ Procurement Transplant Network (UNOS) Chair, WHO Task Force Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation The History of the First Kidney Transplantation – a European Overview European a – Transplantation Kidney First the of History The ISBN 978-963-331-476-0 Robert Langer 9 789633 314760 The History of the First Kidney Transplantation – a European Overview Edited by: Robert Langer SemmelweisPublishers www.semmelweiskiado.hu Budapest, 2019 © Semmelweis Press and Multimedia Studio Budapest, 2019 eISBN 978-963-331-473-9 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletteralumni News of the Newyork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Department of Surgery Volume 13, Number 1 Summer 2010
    NEWSLETTERAlumni News of the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Department of Surgery Volume 13, Number 1 Summer 2010 CUMC 2007-2009 Transplant Activity Profile* Activity Kidney Liver Heart Lung Pancreas Baseline list at year start 694 274 174 136 24 Deceased donor transplant 123 124 93 57 11 Living donor transplant 138 17 — 0 — Transplant rate from list 33% 50% 51% 57% 35% Mortality rate while on list 9% 9% 9% 15% 0% New listings 411 217 144 68 23 Wait list at year finish 735 305 204 53 36 2007-June 2008 Percent 1-Year Survival No % No % No % No % No % Adult grafts 610 91 279 86 169 84 123 89 6 100 Adult patients 517 96 262 88 159 84 116 91 5 100 Pediatric grafts 13 100 38 86 51 91 3 100 0 — Pediatric patients 11 100 34 97 47 90 2 100 0 — Summary Data Total 2009 living donor transplants 155 (89% Kidney) Total 2009 deceased donor transplants 408 (30% Kidney, 30% Liver) 2007-June 2008 adult 1-year patient survival range 84% Heart to 100% Pancreas 2007-June 2008 pediatric 1-year patient survival range 90% Heart to 100% Kidney or lung *Health Resource and Service Administration’s Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Ed Note. The figure shows the US waiting list for whole organs which will only be partially fulfilled by some 8,000 deceased donors, along with 6,600 living donors, who will provide 28,000 to 29,000 organs in 2010. The Medical Center’s role in this process is summarized in the table, and the articles that follow my note expand on this incredible short fall and its potential solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Glands, Vasectomy and the Quest for Rejuvenation in the Roaring Twenties
    122 Review Endeavour Vol.27 No.3 September 2003 ‘Dr Steinach coming to make old young!’: sex glands, vasectomy and the quest for rejuvenation in the roaring twenties Chandak Sengoopta School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London, UK WC1E 7HX In the 1920s, research on the endocrine glands – in the popular and medical press, but so-called organo- especially the sex glands – was widely expected to lead therapy with extracts of every conceivable tissue became to revolutionary new ways of improving human life. a fin-de-sie`cle panacea for virtually every conceivable The medical marketplace was crowded with glandular disorder [4]. It also stimulated a great deal of serious techniques to revitalize the aged. ‘Monkey glands’ experimental research on glandular functions. By the end apart, the Austrian physiologist Eugen Steinach’s simple, of the First World War, all this research had reached a vasectomy-like operation was perhaps the most popular critical mass. The ductless glands and their still mysteri- of these. Steinach was one of the leading endocrine ous secretions came to acquire an air of omnipotence in the researchers of the early 20th century and the Steinach 1920s. ‘We know definitely now,’ announced a popular Operation was based on rigorous laboratory research. It medical work of the 1920s, ‘that the abnormal functioning was much more than a simple scientific error, and its his- of these ductless glands may change a saint into a satyr; a tory shows us how early endocrine research was shaped beauty into a hag; a giant into a pitiful travesty of a human by broader social and cultural forces.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperating Saves Lives Start Contents
    Annual Report 2019 Cooperating saves lives start contents Contents Foreword 1. The Eurotransplant community 2. Eurotransplant: donation, allocation, transplantation and waiting lists This document is optimized for Acrobat Reader for best viewing 3. Report of the Board and the central office experience. 4. Histocompatibility Testing Download Acrobat Reader 5. Reporting of non-resident transplants in Eurotransplant 6. Transplant programs and their delegates in 2019 A high resolution version of this document is also available. 7. Scientific output in 2019 Download high resolution pdf 8. Eurotransplant personnel related statistics 9. Abbreviated financial statements All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system List of abbreviations or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or elsewise, without prior permission of Eurotransplant. For permissions, please contact: [email protected] start contents Foreword Dear reader, We are proud to offer you the 2019, digital edition of the International organ exchange Eurotransplant Annual Report. In this environmentally In 2019, 6981 organs from 2042 deceased donors were friendly, digital report you can easily browse via the used for transplantation for patients on the waiting top menu. Weblinks are added to facilitate in finding list of Eurotransplant. This decrease of the number of more specific information on relevant websites. The reported donors is 5,5% compared to 2018 (2159). report provides an overview of the key statistics on 21.5% of organs were exchanged cross-border between organ donation, allocation and transplantation in all the Eurotransplant member states. Thanks to this Eurotransplant countries. international exchange, a suitable donor organ could be You can also read in the report activities within found for many patients in the different Eurotransplant Eurotransplant that took place, decisions that were member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Trend Over Time of High-Urgency Liver Transplantation Requests in Italy in the 4-Year Period 2014-2017
    Analysis of the Trend Over Time of High-Urgency Liver Transplantation Requests in Italy in the 4-Year Period 2014-2017 S. Trapani*, F. Puoti, V. Morabito, D. Peritore, P. Fiaschetti, A. Oliveti, M. Caprio, L. Masiero, L. Rizzato, L. Lombardini, A. Nanni Costa, and M. Cardillo Italian National Transplant Center, Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy ABSTRACT Background. The national protocol for the handling of high-urgency (HU) liver organ procurement for transplant is administered by the Italian National Transplant Center. In recent years, we have witnessed a change in requests to access the program. We have therefore evaluated their temporal trend, the need to change the access criteria, the percentage of transplants performed, the time of request satisfaction, and the follow-up. Methods. We analyzed all the liver requests for the HU program received during the 4-year period of 2014 to 2017 for adult recipients (18 years of age): all the variables linked to the recipient or to the donor and the organ transplants are registered in the Informative Transplant System as established by the law 91/99. In addition, intention to treat (ITT) survival rates were compared among 4 different groups: (1) patients on standard waiting lists vs (2) patients on urgency waiting lists, and (3) patients with a history of transplant in urgency vs (4) patients with a history of transplant not in urgency. Results. Out of the 370 requests included in the study, 291 (78.7%) were satisfied with liver transplantation. Seventy-nine requests (21.3%) have not been processed, but if we consider only the real failures, this percentage falls to 13.1% and the percentage of satisfied requests rises to 86.9%.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain, France and Italy Are to Exchange Organs for Donation Chains
    Translation of an article published in the Spanish newspaper ABC on 10 October 2012 O.J.D.: 201504 Date: 10/10/2012 E.G.M.: 641000 Section: SOCIETY Pages: 38, 39 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is what happened in Spain’s first ‘crossover’ transplant [For diagram see original article] Altruistic donor The chain started with the kidney donation from a ‘good Samaritan’ going to a recipient in a couple. The wife of the first recipient donated her kidney to a sick person in a second couple. The wife of the second recipient donated her kidney to a third patient on the waiting list. On the waiting list The final recipient, selected using medical criteria, was on the waiting list to receive a kidney from a deceased donor for three years. Spain, France and Italy are to exchange organs for donation chains ► The creation of this type of ‘common area’ in southern Europe will increase the chances of finding a donor match CRISTINA GARRIDO BRUSSELS | Stronger together. Although there are many things on which we find it difficult to agree, this time the strategy was clear. Spain, France and Italy have signed the Southern Europe Transplant Alliance to promote their successful donation and transplant system – which is public, coordinated and directly answerable to the Ministries of Health, as compared to the private models of central and northern Europe – to the international bodies. ‘We (Spain, France and Italy) decided that we had to do something together because we have similar philosophies, ethical criteria and structures and we could not each go our own way given how things are in the northern countries’, explained Dr Rafael Matesanz, Director of the Spanish National Transplant Organisation, at the seminar on donations and transplants organised by the European Commission in Brussels yesterday.
    [Show full text]
  • Value of Donor–Specific Anti–HLA Antibody Monitoring And
    CLINICAL RESEARCH www.jasn.org Value of Donor–Specific Anti–HLA Antibody Monitoring and Characterization for Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Loss † †‡ | Denis Viglietti,* Alexandre Loupy, Dewi Vernerey,§ Carol Bentlejewski, Clément Gosset,¶ † † †‡ Olivier Aubert, Jean-Paul Duong van Huyen,** Xavier Jouven, Christophe Legendre, † | † Denis Glotz,* Adriana Zeevi, and Carmen Lefaucheur* Departments of *Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation and ¶Pathology, Saint Louis Hospital and Departments of ‡Kidney Transplantation and **Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; †Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR-S970, Paris, France; §Methodology Unit (EA 3181) CHRU de Besançon, France; and |University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT The diagnosis system for allograft loss lacks accurate individual risk stratification on the basis of donor– specific anti–HLA antibody (anti-HLA DSA) characterization. We investigated whether systematic moni- toring of DSA with extensive characterization increases performance in predicting kidney allograft loss. This prospective study included 851 kidney recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2010 who were systematically screened for DSA at transplant, 1 and 2 years post-transplant, and the time of post– transplant clinical events. We assessed DSA characteristics and performed systematic allograft biopsies at the time of post–transplant serum evaluation. At transplant, 110 (12.9%) patients had DSAs; post- transplant screening identified 186 (21.9%) DSA-positive patients. Post–transplant DSA monitoring im- proved the prediction of allograft loss when added to a model that included traditional determinants of allograft loss (increase in c statisticfrom0.67;95%confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.73 to 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.77).
    [Show full text]
  • April 2–6, 2008 Gaylord Texan, Dallas, Texas Spring
    Spring ’08 Clinical Meetings April 2–6, 2008 Gaylord Texan, Dallas, Texas JC A[[fkfm_j^A;;F <_dZekj^emj^[DWj_edWbA_Zd[o<ekdZWj_edÊi A_Zd[o;Whbo;lWbkWj_edFhe]hWcYedj_dk[i je[nfWdZ$$$ @::E^hi]ZaVg\ZhiYZiZXi^dcegd\gVb^ci]Z Jc^iZYHiViZh[dg`^YcZnY^hZVhZ# BdgZi]Vc&%%!%%%eVgi^X^eVcih @::E^h[daadl^c\"jel^i]eVgi^X^eVcihdkZg VcZmiZcYZYeZg^dYd[i^bZ# <adWVaZmeVch^dcd[@::E^hjcYZglVn# B[Whdceh[WXekjA;;F m^_b[oekWh[Wjj^[Yed\[h[dY[$ &# K^hijhVii]ZC@;Wddi],&.[dgi]ZaViZhi^c[dgbVi^dc# '#?d^cjh[dgV[gZZ8B:7gZV`[VhiHnbedh^jb^c<gVeZk^cZ8 dcHVijgYVn!6eg^a*!'%%-[gdb+/%%VbÄ-/%%Vb/ Æ8]gdc^X@^YcZn9^hZVhZ>ciZgkZci^dch/ >begdk^c\8@9VcY8K9DjiXdbZh#Ç (# K^Zli]ZaViZhi@::EYViVWZ^c\egZhZciZY^c&&edhiZgh Yjg^c\i]ZedhiZghZhh^dc#Add`[dgedhiZgcjbWZgh/)*!*(! +)!,*!,,!,-!'%*!',%!'-'!'-(VcY'-.# NdjXVcVahdk^h^ia[[fedb_d[$eh][dgi]ZaViZhi@::E^c[dgbVi^dcVcYVhX]ZYjaZd[ hXgZZc^c\hVXgdhhi]ZJ#H# www.keeponline.org '%%-CVi^dcVa@^YcZn;djcYVi^dc!>cX#6aag^\]ihgZhZgkZY#%'"(*"),(6 Prints: 4C — Live Size: 8"w x 11"h Size:Trim 9"w x 12"h Bleed Size: 9.25"w x 12.25"h Ad PGF-0288 AST Abstracts/American of Journal Transplantaion Mechanical resized from by PGF-0163 CF •C •M •Y •Y •K Your Partner in Transplantation At Astellas, we are committed to uncovering new possibilities in immunology through broad scale research aimed at new product development. Through the transference and sharing of scientifi c knowledge, we work in partnership with healthcare professionals like you to positively impact patient care. Our goal remains clear: Enhance the practice of transplantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society
    Proceedings of the Conference Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society held at the University of Exeter, UK 10 March 2012 © CPAS convenors, editors and individual named contributors, 2013 Some rights reserved Copyright in contributions to these proceedings rests with their respective authors. Copyright to the overall collection and arrangement and to any other material in this document rests with the convenors of CPAS and the editors of its proceedings. In the spirit of open-access publishing and with a commitment to the intellectual commons, reuse and distribution of these proceedings for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution± NonCommercial±NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence, which can be read at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ Amongst other things, this licence requires that you attribute material you reproduce to its author, and make clear to those you share it with that they too may reproduce it under the terms of the licence. Anything outside the licence, especially commercial use, requires the express permission of the editors and conference convenors, or of individual authors. Requests to the former should be directed to: [email protected] Edited by Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling Contents Introduction by the editors 5 Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling — Contributions in brief — About CPAS — Acknowledgements — Conference programme Campaigning techniques 11 Keynote address by Dr Richard D. Ryder Animal rights: moral crusade or social
    [Show full text]
  • Eurotimes 11-1 1-20
    10 years By Nick Lane PhD Pioneers Past and Present – But where are the boundaries of the justifiable? heir names justly echo down the halls Elder, his colleagues walked out of early example was the supplanting of horse- “I don’t think for a moment that we’re Tof fame of ophthalmology – Sir presentations; the very concept of IOL drawn carriages by cars; there were many going to see the end of LASIK or corneal Harold Ridley, Peter Choyce, Cornelius implantations was openly repudiated, and people at the time who could see no refractive surgery in general, but as the Binkhorst, Edward Epstein, Svyatoslav dismissed by the AAO as “not sufficiently advantages of cars over horses,” Dr Fine new generations of accommodating IOLs Fyodorov, Charles Kelman, Benedetto proven for use in the US”. Ridley spent told EuroTimes. come into their own, we’re likely to see Strampelli, José Barraquer, Luis Ruiz,Theo years terrified that his early failures would Of course pioneers need more than just more and more people in their fifties and Seiler, Ioannis Pallikaris, to take just a few. come back to haunt him through the vision to succeed; they also need the sixties opting for lens exchange, maybe Their techniques transformed the world courts. In Barcelona, in 1970, Joachim ability to see a technical way through the even before they’ve developed the first and restored sight for millions. But had it Barraquer was forced to explant half of problem, to convert their vision into signs of a cataract.This is not really a not been for their failures, the successes the anterior IOLs that he had implanted in action.And they need to be able to get it technical leap, at least not surgically – it is of today might never have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 WEBSITE VERSION
    Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Pre-publication draft. “Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals?” Published in Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues edited by Andrew Woodhall and Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade (Palgrave Macmillan; 2017) Kim Stallwood An advocate for animals who is an author and independent scholar and consultant [email protected] www.kimstallwood.com Author, Growl: Life Lessons, Hard Truths, and Bold Strategies from an Animal Advocate (Lantern Books; 2017) Kim Stallwood 1 Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals? 1. Protests in the Primaries The 2016 presidential election in the United States had its share of street theatre, but not all was attributable to Donald Trump. Early on in the primaries, on March 30, three protestors from the animal rights organisation Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) interrupted US Senator and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders while he spoke at a town hall meeting in Kenosha, Wisconsin.1 This was one of a small number of protests targeting Sanders by DxE. A YouTube video showed the protestors holding a banner declaring “Animal Liberation Now.” They shouted that Sanders once said, “The greatness of a nationI is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable,” but claimed that Sanders — who campaigned as a “Democratic socialist” — continued to “ignore the most vulnerable in our society,” meaning nonhuman animals. The protestors eventually were drowned out by the crowd’s hand-clapping and chanting of “Bernie! Bernie! Bernie!” From the stage, Sanders gestured for the protestors to sit down.
    [Show full text]