DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL Report 2019 Land Trust of Virginia 2019 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL Report 2019 Land Trust of Virginia 2019 Annual Report ANNUAL Report 2019 Land Trust of Virginia 2019 Annual Report A Message to our Friends and Supporters By the end of 2019 the Land Trust of Virginia’s easement donors had conserved over 20,000 acres, a significant milestone in our 28-year history. In 2019, LTV applied to the Land Trust Accreditation Commission for the second renewal of our status as an Accredited Land Trust, and following a thorough review, we were granted renewed accreditation. This designation serves as recognition that we conduct our business professionally and ethically. These achievements have been made possible, in large part, by the many individuals and businesses that have been so generous with donations of their time and money in support of our work. Conservation Easements Ari has taken on office management responsibilities at LTV, and her diligence LTV recorded 14 conservation easements in 2019 that protected 1,730 acres in and wonderful smile have been a great addition. With Ari on board, Kerry Fauquier, Loudoun, Rappahannock, Clarke, Culpeper, Hanover and Goochland Roszel, Development Manager, has been able to focus more time on her Counties. Those easement properties are highlighted on pages 6, 7 and 8. fundraising work with individuals and corporations. The Board approved another nine conservation easements in 2019 to be Sally and Kerry have continued to build LTV’s roster of volunteers. They have recorded in 2020 that will protect another 909 acres. helped us expand and improve all aspects of our development program and LTV held a total of 188 conservation easements at the end of 2019 that protect have also contributed time to our stewardship work. 20,863 acres in 17 counties. We are deeply appreciative that more landowners Collaboration and Outreach have made so many significant easement donations to LTV. LTV continues as a Steering Committee member of the Blue Ridge Conservation Stewardship Alliance (BRCA). The BRCA seeks ways to leverage our collective resources for In 2019, LTV monitored every property in our easement portfolio. Our the protection of the environment of the Blue Ridge Mountains. staff nurtured our relationships with easement donors and cultivated new LTV participated in the Appalachian Trail Conservancy’s (ATC) Large Landscape relationships with successor owners of our easement properties. Conservation Conference held in Shepherdstown, WV. Members of the eastern Stewardship is an increasingly significant proportion of the work we do. Each regional land conservation communities were in attendance. ATC is especially easement we record adds to the time demands placed on our staff. LTV is ever supportive of LTV’s efforts to conserve land along the Blue Ridge, from the mindful of our long-term stewardship responsibilities. Shenandoah National Park to the Potomac River. Accreditation LTV’s connection to local, statewide and national conservation communities The Land Trust Accreditation Commission’s accreditation process is a rigorous keeps us informed about developments in land conservation and enables us to examination of every aspect of a land trust’s operations. Accreditation confirms share our conservation experiences with others. LTV attends Virginia’s United that a land trust conducts its work with excellence and integrity. Once accredited, Land Trusts’ annual meetings. In 2019, LTV was honored to have Sally selected a land trust undergoes an equally demanding review every five years to renew as a member of the Land Trust Alliance’s Leadership Council, a national honor, its accreditation. which includes participating in two years of leadership programs. Then in October, LTV’s staff and Board Chair attended the Land Trust Alliance’s 2019 In 2009, LTV was one of the first 54 land trusts in the nation (out of more than National Land Conservation Conference (“Rally”) in Raleigh, NC. 1,700) to become accredited. Five years later, in 2014, LTV was one of the first 43 land trusts to earn a renewal of its accreditation. In 2019, LTV submitted our Development and Capacity Building application for the second renewal of our accreditation. LTV is now one of the LTV’s conservation successes result in additional permanent stewardship first 28 land trusts in the nation to have its accreditation renewed twice. responsibilities, and our Board recognizes the growth of those obligations and works to ensure that we have adequate funding to meet them. Staff and Volunteers Ashton Cole, Director of Conservation and Stewardship, Isa Bryant, Stewardship LTV has received gifts of real estate in Stafford, Prince William and Albemarle Manager, and Seth Young, Conservation and Stewardship Associate, have Counties. Each represents an opportunity to conserve more land. LTV accepts become an effective and productive team. Beyond the 14 easements recorded these donations with the same care taken when we accept donations of and the nine additional easements approved by the Board in 2019, Ashton, conservation easements. We will monetize several of these gifts to bolster the Isa and Seth worked on a dozen other easement projects that will be ready endowment of our conservation and stewardship work. One of the properties for Board review in 2020. They also made significant contributions to the is currently on the market (see page 18 of this report) and we expect to list preparation of LTV’s application for accreditation renewal. others in 2020. LTV continues to grow our capacity to do more land conservation and LTV has become the holder of more conservation easements than any other stewardship work in the future. An important part of our growth in 2019 was private land trust in Virginia through the work of a professional staff, a dedicated the addition of Andy Stout and Ari Govoni-Young to our staff. Board and the generosity of our many supporters. We are grateful for the faith ANNUALthat so many have in us and will continue to prove ourselves worthy of your trust. Andy has years of land conservation experience, formerly working in the field of archaeological resource protection. At LTV, he works closely For the Board, with Sally Price, LTV’s Executive Director, on special programs and has contributed to our expanded outreach to foundations that support land conservation organizations. Christopher C. Dematatis 2 Report 2019 Annual Report Land Trust of Virginia Look What You've Helped Us Accomplish 188 See easement donors listed on pages 4 & 5 174 See volunteers listed on page 9 160 See donors listed on pages 14 – 18 150 144 140 136 123 117 188 easements 106 104 donated, 20,868 97 acres protected. 85 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Acres Protected by LTV Easements Protected Cultural and Natural Resources Forest: 8,473 acres Farmland and Agricultural Lands: 10,294 acres Counties Wetlands, Riparian Areas, Mountain Areas and Steep Loudoun: 9,087 acres and Floodplains: Slopes: 1,875 acres 1,016 acres Fauquier: 5,023 acres Rivers, Creeks, Greene: 1,353 acres Madison: 290 acres Battlefield Properties and Streams: (38 properties): 1,958 acres Culpeper: 1,307 acres Clarke: 207 acres 100 miles Nelson: 850 acres Stafford: 187 acres Properties proximate to national, state, Albemarle: 819 acres Goochland: 117 acres or local parks, forests, and wildlife areas: 35 properties Orange: 544 acres Louisa: 99 acres Rappahannock: 532 acres Hanover: 72 acres King George: 318 acres Fredericksburg: 3 acres 3 Land Trust of Virginia 2019 Annual Report 2019 Financial Report 2019 Earned Revenue 2019 Expenses 5% 7% 5% 6% 10% Contributions 27% Easement Operations Stewardship Fees 13% Public Information Easement Fees 19% 42% Stewardship Special Events 5% Management & General Grants Fundraising 38% 19% Investment Earnings Property Cost Community Conservation Leaders The following is a listing of the individuals and families who have protected their properties through conservation easements. Their names are listed in the order in which easements were recorded beginning in 1998 through 2019. Cammack Brothers Partership Ed and Karen Hauswald John and Laura Robic Monroe and Mary Leigh* Carolyn Reeder* and Jack Reeder Virginia Tax Credit Partners Virginia Friend Potomac Appalachian Trail Club Eric DeSilva Christine Perdue and Turner Smith, Jr. Dot Shetterly Wildcat Farm Edward and Portia Meares* Patric Copeland and Maura Walsh-Copeland Donald and Mary Graham Jonelle St. John and Stephen Zielenski Sara Loken* Learning Tree Farms, LLC James Clark, III Dr. Gar Royer Bob Soonthornchai Donna Arnold Robert Elgin Mutton Hollow, Inc. Marc and Janna Leepson Dr. Alfred Griffin, Jr. and Dr. Susan Griffin Beaver Creek Farm, LLC Edward Harrell Charles and Toni Gauthier Nevertell Farm, LLC Winston and Linda Porter Northern Virginia Conservation Trust Rodion Cantacuzene* and Melissa Cantacuzene Ayrshire Farm, LC Hank and Marcia Woolman Sam and Uta Brown Frank Kraemer, Jr. Mark and Wanda Salser William Harrison Herb and Jacqui Gammons Jeffrey and Sandra Middour Glaydin Hamlet, LLC Scott Denman and Virginia Watkins Jeffrey and Herta Gould Bruce* and Edie Smart Dean Linderman William and Lou Kennedy Guy and Valerie Dove Bill and Susan Ferster Charles MacFarlane Paul and Evelyn McMichael Michael Henke Francis and Margaret O'Neill Patricia Milligan Chris and Linda Young Jay and Estelle Zeiler John Milligan George Griffith Estate Vern and Mary Sue Conaway Kathryn Milam and Barbara Riggs Mae Jane Coughlin* Gary and Debra Callen Ben and Carol Lenhart Murriel Trittipoe* Michael and Allyson Alto Charles Strother, Jr.* Richard and Susan Barnett Michael and Karen Jackley David Dobson Jean Mohler* and EvanANNUAL Mohler Tom and Ruth Peters Wayne and Linda Huyard Terry and Diana Arney Royce and Lee Kincaid Malcolm* and Pamela Baldwin Lori Keenan and Sean McGuinness Chris Ambrose Deborah Tabb Al diZerega Mark and Kate Zurschmeide John and Susan Stanford Dr. John and Di Cook Dean and Margarita Dilley Sharon Hickson Dr. Lawrence Finkel and Anna Penna Roger Duncan and Barbara Toohill Roger and Azita Rutti 4 Report 2019 Annual Report Land Trust of Virginia Paul and Pamela Smith Bettina Gregory James and Mary Hutton Rose Marie Bogley Peter Trick Andrew and Brenda Pryor Chris and Barbara Wall Les and Marilyn Cheek Rock Hill Farm Property, LLC Doug and Toni Flory Larry Buckner, Sr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society
    Proceedings of the Conference Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society held at the University of Exeter, UK 10 March 2012 © CPAS convenors, editors and individual named contributors, 2013 Some rights reserved Copyright in contributions to these proceedings rests with their respective authors. Copyright to the overall collection and arrangement and to any other material in this document rests with the convenors of CPAS and the editors of its proceedings. In the spirit of open-access publishing and with a commitment to the intellectual commons, reuse and distribution of these proceedings for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution± NonCommercial±NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence, which can be read at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ Amongst other things, this licence requires that you attribute material you reproduce to its author, and make clear to those you share it with that they too may reproduce it under the terms of the licence. Anything outside the licence, especially commercial use, requires the express permission of the editors and conference convenors, or of individual authors. Requests to the former should be directed to: [email protected] Edited by Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling Contents Introduction by the editors 5 Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling — Contributions in brief — About CPAS — Acknowledgements — Conference programme Campaigning techniques 11 Keynote address by Dr Richard D. Ryder Animal rights: moral crusade or social
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 WEBSITE VERSION
    Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Pre-publication draft. “Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals?” Published in Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues edited by Andrew Woodhall and Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade (Palgrave Macmillan; 2017) Kim Stallwood An advocate for animals who is an author and independent scholar and consultant [email protected] www.kimstallwood.com Author, Growl: Life Lessons, Hard Truths, and Bold Strategies from an Animal Advocate (Lantern Books; 2017) Kim Stallwood 1 Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals? 1. Protests in the Primaries The 2016 presidential election in the United States had its share of street theatre, but not all was attributable to Donald Trump. Early on in the primaries, on March 30, three protestors from the animal rights organisation Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) interrupted US Senator and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders while he spoke at a town hall meeting in Kenosha, Wisconsin.1 This was one of a small number of protests targeting Sanders by DxE. A YouTube video showed the protestors holding a banner declaring “Animal Liberation Now.” They shouted that Sanders once said, “The greatness of a nationI is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable,” but claimed that Sanders — who campaigned as a “Democratic socialist” — continued to “ignore the most vulnerable in our society,” meaning nonhuman animals. The protestors eventually were drowned out by the crowd’s hand-clapping and chanting of “Bernie! Bernie! Bernie!” From the stage, Sanders gestured for the protestors to sit down.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Problematisations in the Live Export Policy Debates
    ANIMAL CRUELTY, DISCOURSE, AND POWER: A STUDY OF PROBLEMATISATIONS IN THE LIVE EXPORT POLICY DEBATES Brodie Lee Evans Bachelor of Arts (Politics, Economy, and Society; Literary Studies) Bachelor of Justice (First Class Honours) Graduate Certificate in Business (Accounting) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Queensland University of Technology 2018 School of Justice | Faculty of Law This page intentionally left blank Statement of Originality Under the Copyright Act 1968, this thesis must be used only under the normal conditions of scholarly fair dealing. In particular, no results or conclusions should be extracted from it, nor should it be copied or closely paraphrased in whole or in part without the written consent of the author. Proper written acknowledgement should be made for any assistance obtained from this thesis. The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made. Brodie Evans QUT Verified Signature ……………………………………………………………………….. Signature October 2018 ……………………………………………………………………….. Date i Dedication For Scottie. ii Abstract Since the release of video footage exposing the treatment of animals in the live export industry in 2011, ‘animal cruelty’ has increasingly been a major concern in mainstream Australian discourse. Critiques over the inadequacy of current legal protections afforded to animals have had a significant impact on how we debate animal welfare issues and the solutions to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Eindversie Dissertation an Ravelingien
    FACULTY OF ARTS AND PHILOSOPHY PIG TALES, HUMAN CHIMERAS AND MAN-MADE PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARDS AN ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF XENOTRANSPLANT BENEFITS AND RISKS by AN RAVELINGIEN DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT GHENT UNIVERSITY (June, 2006) SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISORS Prof. Dr. JOHAN BRAECKMAN Prof. Dr. ILSE KERREMANS Prof. Dr. ERIC MORTIER Prof. Dr. FREDDY MORTIER {Title page: The illustration is an adaptation of the embryo drawings drawn by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 for his Recapitulation Theory} Acknowledgements The process of writing this dissertation has been nothing short of a growing experience. It has allowed for a gradual transition from student life to ‘reality’, while giving me the opportunity to further extend the roots of my education and main interests. I want to thank the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research for the financial support of this research project, which has introduced me to new ideas, new people and new parts of the world. Of course, there would not have been a project had Johan Braeckman not encouraged me to apply for a grant to begin with. Johan has witnessed my ‘growth process’ (as well as the growing pains that have accompanied it) and I am deeply indebted to him for his active belief in my work as well as for the continuous support, encouragement and constructive criticism. It seems that nothing was too much to ask him. Despite his busy schedule, he never resisted reading, rereading and commenting on my papers. His dedication to ethics and philosophy is sincere, inspiring and fun (indeed, what would philosophy be without Cosmo Kramer?).
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Toward Animal Research and Experimentation: an Annotated Bibliography [2011-2019]
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 5-2019 Attitudes Toward Animal Research and Experimentation: An Annotated Bibliography [2011-2019] Erich Yahner The Humane Society of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/antbiblio Part of the Animal Experimentation and Research Commons, Animal Studies Commons, and the Other Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Yahner, Erich, "Attitudes Toward Animal Research and Experimentation: An Annotated Bibliography [2011-2019]" (2019). Anthrozoology. 1. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/antbiblio/1 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOCUMENT TYPE Annotated Bibliography SUBJECT Attitudes Toward Animal Research and Experimentation DATE(S) 2011-2019 CREATED BY Erich Yahner AFFILIATION The Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy Agell, L., Soria, V., & Carrió, M. (2015). Using role play to debate animal testing. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 309- 321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.943788 The use of animals in biomedical research is a socio-scientific issue in which decision-making is complicated. In this article, we describe an experience involving a role play activity performed during school visits to the Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB) to debate animal testing. Role playing games require students to defend different positions and permit participants to debate and reflect on their personal opinions. A total of 262 students from 15- to 30-years-old participated in the activity. The article presents an analysis of the students’ opinions on this topic before and after performing the activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process
    Society & Animals 19 (2011) 356-367 brill.nl/soan Protecting Animals versus the Pursuit of Knowledge: The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process Dan Lyons University of Sheffield [email protected] Abstract Animal research in the United Kingdom is regulated by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, which requires a government minister to weigh the expected suffering of animals against the expected benefits of a proposed animal research project—the “cost-benefit assessment”— before licensing the project. Research into the implementation of this legislation has been severely constrained by statutory confidentiality. This paper overcomes this hindrance by describ- ing a critical case study based on unprecedented primary data: pig-to-primate organ transplanta- tion conducted between 1995 and 2000. It reveals that researchers and regulators significantly underestimated the adverse effects suffered by the animals involved, while overestimating the scientific and medical benefits likely to accrue. Applying dynamic policy network analysis to this case in the context of the evolution of animal research policy indicates that an elitist, policy com- munity type network has persisted since shortly after the network’s formation in 1876. Animal research interests have repeatedly withstood pressure for change from animal protection groups because of their greater resources, structural advantages, and a culture of secrecy that facilitates an implementation gap in animal research regulation. Keywords animal research, Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, implementation, policy community, policy networks Introduction: Reevaluating UK Animal Research Policy In this paper I seek to describe and explain not only what has been happening to animals in British laboratories, but why, and how democratic, or politically legitimate, those outcomes are.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Pure Lauren A
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 2-28-2006 Florida Pure Lauren A. Doyle Florida International University DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI15101223 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Fiction Commons Recommended Citation Doyle, Lauren A., "Florida Pure" (2006). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3236. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3236 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida FLORIDA PURE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ARTS in CREATIVE WRITING by Lauren A. Doyle 2006 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by Lauren A. Doyle, and entitled Florida Pure, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. John Dufresne Bruce Harvey Lynne Barrett, Major Professor Date of Defense: February 28, 2006 The thesis of Lauren A. Doyle is approved. Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences Interim Dean Stephan L. Mintz University Graduate School Florida International University, 2006 ii DEDICATION For my parents, with love and gratitude iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks, especially, to Lynne Barrett, for whose wisdom and support I am forever grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Lush Prize for Lobbying - 2015
    Lush Prize for Lobbying - 2015 Research Paper Lush Prize for Lobbying, 2015 – Research Paper 1 1 Executive Summary The use of animals in laboratories is often entrenched by legal requirements or a regulatory reluctance to accept the scientific superiority of non-animal testing methods. Political lobbying is an essential part of the campaign to end animal testing. The definition of the Lush Prize for Lobbying1 is: “Scientific innovation needs to go hand-in-hand with policy change to ensure that end-users of new testing approaches – industry and regulators – are receptive and responsive to the new methods. Such change requires a multifaceted, global approach, including science-based lobbying at the national level or supra-national level to: • Entrench non-animal testing methods in national, EU or OECD programmes of test guidelines • Revise existing guidelines to reflect best practices, including the removal of animal tests, or • Achieve a mandatory requirement for non-animal testing in legislation, regulatory policies, testing guidance, etc.” This paper examines some of the key issues relating to animal testing in several countries that are of particular relevance to the Lush Prize, which focuses on toxicity testing for consumer products and ingredients. These key issues relate to cosmetics testing and chemical testing. Recent lobbying initiatives are discussed, as well as several recent successes. This is a crucial time for lobbying on these issues and important results have been achieved, such as the European Union (EU) ban on marketing animal testing cosmetics, which is making waves around the world. Also included is a list of organisations around the world that are active in lobbying either locally, nationally or internationally, on animal experimentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Objava Patenata
    HRVATSKI GLASNIK INTELEKTUALNOG VLASNIŠTVA 8/2018 20.04.2018. REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI ZAVOD ZA INTELEKTUALNO VLASNIŠTVO SADRŽAJ - PATENTI Objava prijava patenata 1 Kazalo brojeva prijava patenata 2 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka prijava patenata prema MKP 2 Kazalo podnositelja prijava patenata 2 Objava zahtjeva za priznanje patenata provedbom postupka potpunog ispitivanja prijava patenata 3 Objava zahtjeva za priznanje patenata bez potpunog ispitivanja prijava patenata 4 Objava patenata 5 Kazalo brojeva patenata 6 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka patenata prema MKP 6 Kazalo nositelja prijava patenata 6 Objava konsenzualnih patenata 7 Kazalo brojeva konsenzualnih patenata 8 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka konsenzualnih patenata prema MKP 8 Kazalo nositelja konsenzualnih patenata 8 Objava upisa promjena u Registru patenata 9 Objava prestanaka vrijednosti patenata 10 Objava zahtjeva za proširenje europskih prijava patenata 11 Kazalo brojeva zahtjeva za proširenje europskih prijava patenata 12 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka zahtjeva za proširenje europskih prijava patenata prema MKP 13 Kazalo podnositelja zahtjeva za proširenje europskih prijava patenata 14 Objava proširenih europskih patenata 15 Kazalo brojeva proširenih europskih patenata 18 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka proširenih europskih patenata prema MKP 19 Kazalo nositelja proširenih europskih patenata 21 Objava prestanaka vrijednosti proširenih europskih patenata 22 Objava europskih patenata 23 Kazalo brojeva europskih patenata 51 Kazalo klasifikacijskih oznaka europskih patenata
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT TYPE Annotated Bibliography Attitudes Toward
    DOCUMENT TYPE Annotated Bibliography SUBJECT Attitudes Toward Animal Research and Experimentation DATE(S) 2011-2019 CREATED BY Erich Yahner AFFILIATION The Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy Agell, L., Soria, V., & Carrió, M. (2015). Using role play to debate animal testing. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 309- 321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.943788 The use of animals in biomedical research is a socio-scientific issue in which decision-making is complicated. In this article, we describe an experience involving a role play activity performed during school visits to the Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB) to debate animal testing. Role playing games require students to defend different positions and permit participants to debate and reflect on their personal opinions. A total of 262 students from 15- to 30-years-old participated in the activity. The article presents an analysis of the students’ opinions on this topic before and after performing the activity. Our results show that students actively took part in debate and made use of the new information provided by the game, especially the legal aspects. In conclusion, the role play activity helped participants to create a more informed opinion, stimulated critical thinking and argumentation skills. We encourage science teachers to use role playing games to discuss socio-scientific issues. Beversdorf, D., & Adams, N. (2016). Attitudes Toward Animal Research Among Medical Students in the United States (S3. 006). Background: For the process of development of new treatments for patients, there are many steps necessary to establish safety, mechanism of action, and efficacy before the new treatment can be used clinically.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Protect Animal Welfare Deliberation, Democracy and Representation
    How to Protect Animal Welfare deliberation, democracy and representation Policy Research Briefing Rob Garner, Dan Lyons & Angela Roberts January 2016 About the authors Rob Garner is Professor of Politics at the University of Leicester, specialising in animal protectionism and the political representation of non-human interests. He is the author of several books on the subject, including A Theory of Justice for Animals (OUP, 2013), Animal Ethics (Polity, 2005), The Political Theory of Animal Rights (MUP, 2005) and Animals, Politics and Morality (MUP, 2004). Dan Lyons is CEO of the CASJ and Honorary Research Fellow at the Department of Politics, University of Sheffield. Dan was director of campaigns with Uncaged from 1994 to 2011. Between 2000 and 2003 he fought a legal battle against Novartis Pharma to win the right to publish leaked documents revealing illegal cruelty and regulatory failures during pig-to-primate organ transplant experiments. In 2008 he won the UK Political Studies Association prize for the best PhD thesis in Governance and Public Administration for his research into the evolution of British animal experimentation policy, and his book The Politics of Animal Experimentation was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2014. He is also a Member of the Irish Government’s National Committee for the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes and was elected to serve on the RSPCA’s National Trustee Council in June 2015. Angela Roberts co-founded animal protection group Uncaged in 1993 and the CASJ in 2011, where she is Managing Director. With 25 years experience of campaigning at every level Angela is one of the most experienced animal advocates in the UK.
    [Show full text]