DOCSLIB.ORG

R01873 • ••··:-.:5' .~ ~H1~Te~~~N~A~T~/O=N~A~/~Fo=O=U~N~D=A~T~Io=N~~~O~R~£=J~E~A~O=~~A~/~S~¥Rt~=E=M=S~ ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R01873 • ••··:-.:5' .~ ~H1~Te~~~N~A~T~/O=N~A~/~Fo=O=U~N~D=A~T~Io=N~~~O~R~£=J~E~A~O=~~A~/~S~¥Rt~=E=M=S~ ______ Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 11 Tab Number: 25 Document Title: US/USSR Exchange of Election Officials (IFES Grant Report to Charles Stewart Document Date: 1992 Document Country: Russia IFES ID: R01873 • ••··:-.:5' .~ ~h1~te~~~n~a~t~/o=n~a~/~Fo=o=u~n~d=a~t~io=n~~~o~r~£=J~e~a~o=~~a~/~S~¥rt~=e=m=s~ __________ ~ 1620 1 STREET. N.w.• SUITE 611 • WASHINGTON. D.c. 20006' 1202) 828-8507' FAX 1202) 452-0804 • • • • • • DO NOT REMOVE FROM IFES RESOURCE CENTER! • • • BOARD OF F. Ohon White Patricia Hurar James M. Cannon Randal C. Teague DIRECTORS Chairman Secretary Counsel Richard M. Scammon Charles Manau John C. White Richard W. Soudrietle • Vice Chairman Treasurer Robert C. Walker Director • • TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PROJECT OVERVIEW . section I • FINANCIAL INFORMATION .Section II LETTERS OF INVITATION .Appendix A 1991 RUSSIA TRIP REPORT . .Appendix B • 1992 RUSSIA TRIP REPORT • . .Appendix C • • • • • • • • MOTT FOUNDATION GRANT REPORTING FORM • NARRATIVE REPORT Grantee International Foundation for Electoral Systems Program US/USSR Exchange of Election Officials Project • Mott Foundation Grant #90-065- Reporting Period 9/31/91 to 5/1/92 (starting date) (ending date) • SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US/USSR Election Officials Exchange Program began in March 1989. In March of 1990, the International Foundation for Electoral • System received a grant for the amount of $141,670 from the Charles stewart Mott Foundation (#90-065) to continue support for this program. In 1991 the accelerating pace of reform in the Soviet Union, the August coup and the eventual demise of the Union, resulted in • IFES requesting an extension of the grant from September 1991 to March 1992. This extension allowed IFES to assess the new situation in the former Soviet republics and to amend its program in order to establish a program with election officials in the individual republics. • In March 1992 IFES sent a three person team of election experts to Belarus and Russia to meet with election officials in these two key republics. The team has submitted a comprehensive report on the electoral process in Belarus and details of the meeting held with Russian Central Electoral Commission Chairman, Vasily Kazakov to discuss new priorities for technical election • assistance. This last phase in the US/USSR Election Officials Exchange has set the scene for the future work of IFES in the individual republics of the former Soviet Union where election officials, finding themselves abruptly deprived of centralized direction from • Moscow, are beginning to review their existing election systems. Although each republic will take its own, individual course and choose its own system, IFES is in an excellent position to build on this experience in planning follow up work both in Russia and • Belarus and to begin work in other former Soviet republics. 1 • • The International Foundation for Electoral Systems wishes to express its gratitude to the Charles Stewart Foundation for its invaluable support for the US/USSR Election Officials Exchange over • the past three years. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 1. List the reporting objectives referred to in the grant commitment letter and concisely indicate progress achieved toward • each objective. Part A. Pre-election assessment in Belarus, March 1992 Following the approval in November 1991 of the extension of grant #90-065 until the end March 1992, IFES initiated steps to send Dr. Richard Smolka to the Ukraine in December 1991. • Unfortunately due to visa problems he was unable to be present to assess the conduct of the Ukrainian presidential election on December 1, 1991. Therefore in view of the fact that no further elections were scheduled in the Ukraine, IFES accepted an invitation to visit the • Republic of Belarus in March 1992. The visit took place on the invitation of the Chairman of Legislative committee of the Supreme Soviet of Belarus who requested assistance in the drafting of electoral and constitutional legislation prior to forthcoming parliamentary elections. • IFES sent a three person team to Belarus consisting of Mr. William Kimberling, Deputy Director, National Clearing House, Federal Election Commission; Dr. Richard Smolka, Professor of Public Affairs, American University; and Mr. Hoyt Clifton, Director, Bureau of Elections of New Mexico and newly-elected President of the National Association of State Directors of • Elections. The team examined the following elements of the Belarus election process : • A. Political environment B. Constitutional system C. Election system • D. Legislating the election system E. Administering the election system F. Drawing of electoral boundaries • G. Providing ballot access 2 • • H. Registering voters • I. Campaign financing and voter education J. Balloting K. contesting elections and recounts • Please refer to the comprehensive trip report enclosed. Part B. on-site assistance team to Russia • In September 1991 IFES held productive discussions with Vasiliy Kazakov concerning the provision of technical assistance to the Russian republic. (Please find trip report, dated October 16, 1991 in Appendix B. As a follow-up to these discussions the three person team • visited Moscow on its return from Minsk, to meet with Chairman Kazakov. Discussions took place regarding the political situation in Russia where the Supreme Soviet is currently working on a new draft constitution and issues of economic reform. It appears to be the judgement of the Supreme Soviet, however, that elections should not take place until 1993 by which time it is hoped that • economic reform will have taken root, leading to increased political stability. IFES therefore plans to seek funds for technical election internships for Russian election officials in the US and western Europe prior to the next elections. IFES considers that offering • technical election internships for election officials lasting from one and three months to election officials is the most cost­ effective technical assistance that can be made at this stage. (Please find trip report in Appendix C). • 2. What favorable or unfavorable variance(s) from stated goals, objectives and projected expenditures occurred during the period? Indicate if the variance will hinder or prevent accomplishment of objectives. As stated above, IFES decided to send a team to Belarus • ~nstead of the Ukraine, given the relative proximity of elections ~n Belarus. Whereas the Ukraine has received considerable attention in the west since the demise of the Soviet Union, Belarus is the 'forgotten' republic. The IFES team was able to gain unique first-hand knowledge of the current political issues in Belarus and to establish contacts with election and legislative officials in • the republic. IFES will continue to assist the election officials 3 • • in Belarus by means of technical election internships and on-site pre-election assistance once the elections are called. • The unique nature of the trip was underlined by the considerable interest attracted by the team's briefing after its return. This briefing was organized in coordination with the CSCE (see invitation in Appendix A) and was attended by a wide variety of representatives from institutions in Washington, D.C. as well as congress committee staff members. The Voice of America recorded • the entire briefing and sent out excerpts on the VOA Russian Language Service. The team's visit to Russia was another important stage in the consolidation of the relationship that IFES has established since the outset of the US/USSR Election Officials Exchange program in • 1989. This visit marked the beginning of a new phase in the relationship with the emphasis moving from election officials exchanges to the offering of technical assistance and the prospect of technical election internships for Russian election administrators. • 3. Do you currently expect that the planned results will be produced by the completion of this grant period? If not, explain. The objectives of this program were achieved on schedule. • 4. Do you currently expect to continue this program after the end of this grant? :If so, does your organization have in place a commitment for appropriate resources? IFES hopes to build on the contacts and expertise gained through the program of US/USSR Election Officials Exchange Program • in order to diversify its work in the former soviet Union. IFES is therefore seeking funds from a variety of sources to implement technical election assessment missions in republics where there are scheduled elections, for example, Georgia and Estonia; carry out civic education analyses building on the existing IFES • program in Romania; organize training seminars for republic election officials by using the expertise of officials in' the Association of Election Officials from East and Central Europe; and offer technical election internships in the united States and Western Europe. • IFES looks forward to building on the work instituted during the time period of this grant. The contacts and expertise gained during the US/USSR Election Officials Exchange program are unique. IFES greatly appreciates the confidence that the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation displayed in the awarding of this grant to our • Foundation and for the great understanding displayed concerning the 4 • • extensions and amendments necessitated by the extraordinary pace of events in the former soviet union leading to the dissolution of • the Union itself. IFES is now in an excellent position to diversify its work into the former soviet republics and to assist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Protean Nature of the Fifth Republic Institutions (Duverger)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscription. Author(s): Ben Clift Article Title: The Fifth Republic at Fifty: The Changing Face of French Politics and Political Economy Year of publication: 2008 Link to published article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639480802413322 Publisher statement: This is an electronic version of an article published in Clift, B. (2008). The Fifth Republic at Fifty: The Changing Face of French Politics and Political Economy. Modern & Contemporary France, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 383-.398. Modern & Contemporary France is available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cmcf20/16/4 Modern and Contemporary France Special Issue - Introduction Dr. Ben Clift Senior Lecturer in Political Economy, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Email: [email protected] web: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/clift/ The Fifth Republic at Fifty: The Changing Face of French Politics and Political Economy. At its inception, a time of great political upheaval in France, it was uncertain whether the new regime would last five years, let alone fifty. The longevity of the regime is due in part to its flexibility and adaptability, which is a theme explored both below and in all of the contributions to this special issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Communique
    ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF COMMUNAUTE ECONOMIQUE WEST AFRICAN STATES DES ETATS DE L'AFRIQUE ^ DE L'OUEST WENTY SIXTH SESSION OF THE AUTHORITY OF HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT Dakar, 31 January 2003 Final Communique • J/v^ u'\ Final Communique of the 26m Session of the Authority Page 1 1. The twenty sixth ordinary session of the Authority of Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), washeid in Dakar on 31 January 2003. underthe Chairmanship of His Excellency Maitre Abdoulave Wade, President of the Republic of Senegal, and current Chairman of ECOWAS. 2. The following Heads of State and Government or their duly accredited representatives were present at the session: His Excellency Mathieu Kerekou President of the Republic of Benin His Excellency John Agyekum Kufuor President of the Republic of Ghana His Excellency Koumba Yaila President of the Republic of Guinea Bissau His Excellency Charles Gankay Iayior President of the Republic of Liberia His Excellency Amadou Toumani Toure President of the Republic of Mali His Excellency Mamadou Tandja President of the Republic of Niger His Excellency Olusegun Obasanic President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria His Excellency Abdoulaye Wade President of the Republic of Senegal His Excellency General Gnassingbe Eyadem; President of the Togolese Republic Y-\er Excellency, isatou Njie-Saidy Vice-President of the Republic a The Gambia Representing the President of the Republic His Excellency Ernest Paramanga Yonli Prime Minister . \ Representing the President of Faso \ Final Communique ofthe 26m Session of the Authority Paae 2 His Excellency Lamine Sidime Prime Minister of the Republic of Guinea Representing the President of the Republic Mrs Fatima Veiga Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation Representing the President of Cabo Verde Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Political System of France the Fifth Republic • the Fifth Republic Was
    Political System of France The Fifth Republic • The fifth republic was established in 1958, and was largely the work of General de Gaulle - its first president, and Michel Debré his prime minister. It has been amended 17 times. Though the French constitution is parliamentary, it gives relatively extensive powers to the executive (President and Ministers) compared to other western democracies. • A popular referendum approved the constitution of the French Fifth Republic in 1958, greatly strengthening the authority of the presidency and the executive with respect to Parliament. • The constitution does not contain a bill of rights in itself, but its preamble mentions that France should follow the principles of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, as well as those of the preamble to the constitution of the Fourth Republic. • This has been judged to imply that the principles laid forth in those texts have constitutional value, and that legislation infringing on those principles should be found unconstitutional if a recourse is filed before the Constitutional Council. The executive branch • The head of state and head of the executive is the President, elected by universal suffrage. • France has a semi-presidential system of government, with both a President and a Prime Minister. • The Prime Minister is responsible to the French Parliament. • A presidential candidate is required to obtain a nationwide majority of non- blank votes at either the first or second round of balloting, which implies that the President is somewhat supported by at least half of the voting population. • The President of France, as head of state and head of the executive, thus carries more power than leaders of most other European countries, where the two functions are separate (for example in the UK, the Monarch and the Prime minister, in Germany the President and the Chancellor.) • Since May 2017, France's president is Emmanuel Macron, who was elected to the post at age 39, the youngest French leader since Napoleon.
    [Show full text]
  • HE the Minister of State to the President of The
    Signature of the EUCLID Participation Agreements by the Government of Senegal (Above: Implementation meeting with ASG Imara Johnpullé held at the Permanent Mission of Senegal to the United Nations, August 2009) H.E. the Minister of State to the President of the Republic, Abdoulaye Faye 2009 Signed in: Dakar Participation in the Euclid Educational Framework – 1 ACCORD CADRE MIS A JOUR CONCERNANT LA PARTICIPATION DES PARTIES A EUCLIDE TELLE QUE CONSTITUÉE ET DÉFINIE ICI Les Parties Participantes, S’appuyant sur divers accords signés entre 2005 et 2008 ; Cherchant à promouvoir le Développement Durable de leurs nations, en particulier par la promotion de l’accès à l’éducation supérieure certains groupes spécifiques tel que les femmes, les officiels et fonctionnaires éligibles, ainsi que pour le grand public ; Conviennent comme suit : Article I Les Parties participent déjà et continuent à participer à EUCLIDE / EUCLID (Euclid University) (pouvant aussi être appelé Pôle Universitaire Euclide) qui a déjà et qui continue à avoir la personnalité juridique internationale, un statut sans but lucratif, et les capacités telles que nécessaire à l’exercice de ses fonctions et pour accomplir ses objectifs. EUCLID (Euclid University) est déjà et continue à être éligible pour la protection de sa propriété intellectuelle par l’Organisation Mondiale de la Propriété Intellectuelle en accord avec l’Article 6ter de la Convention de Paris. Afin d’assurer l’utilité internationale des formations offertes, EUCLIDE est autorisée à conférer des diplômes, titres et certificats accrédités par les ministères de l’Education des Parties Participantes. EUCLIDE, membre du Consortium Euclide, reçoit le mandat de faciliter l’accès universel à l’éducation supérieure et de promouvoir l’acquisition du savoir et des compétences sous la supervision des ministères de l’Education et des Affaires Etrangères des Parties Participantes.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
    LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years.
    [Show full text]
  • OGT #4: Government, Enlightenment, and Citizen Rights and Responsibilities
    OGT #4: Government, Enlightenment, and Citizen Rights and Responsibilities Types of Government 1. Types of government are determined by who’s in charge and what type of power rulers have/or rights citizens have 2. sovereign power: the right to rule 3. monarchy: ruler inherits power, usually a king or queen 4. absolute monarchy: power is inherited (passed down through family) claims power through divine right (chosen by God) ruler has all the power and people have no rights or freedoms (similar to a dictatorship except for how the ruler gains power) the people have no voice in selecting who rules not all rulers are capable rulers Ex, King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette (French Revolution) only exist today where governments have failed to check the of a ruling family 5. constitutional monarchy: power in inherited (passed down through family) Power is limited by a constitution or an elected legislature. People enjoy basic rights and a voice in government. Ex. United Kingdom—Queen Elizabeth II is a figurehead; the real government body is the Parliament headed by the Prime Minister. The Lower House of Parliament is elected by the people and the Prime Minister is chosen from Parliament. Other examples: the Netherlands, Kuwait, and Jordan 6. dictatorship: a single person or a small group (oligarchy) seize power (although later can be inherited) Ruler has unlimited power. Decision can be made quickly. Usually has backing of the military and uses threat of force to remain in control. The ruler makes the laws and runs the court system. No separation of powers or checks and balances; Dissenters (people who disagree) are eliminated with intimidation, arrest, or murder.
    [Show full text]
  • MENA-OECD Ministerial Conference Key Participants & Speakers
    Republic of Tunisia MENA-OECD Ministerial Conference Key Participants & Speakers – Biographies Hosts Mr. Beji Caïd Essebsi - President of the Republic - Tunisia Mr. Essebsi is the President of Tunisia since 2014. Previously, Mr. Essebsi held the position of Prime Minister for a brief period – March to October 2011. During his career, the President has held various high level positions, including Head of the Administration of National Security (1963), Minister of Interior from (1965-1969), Minister of Foreign Affairs (1981-1986) and President of the Chamber of Deputies (1990-1991). The President was also ambassador of Tunisia to West Germany and France. Mr. Youssef Chahed - Prime Minister - Tunisia Mr. Chahed was appointed Tunisian Prime Minister in August 2016. Before taking office, Mr. Chahed was Minister of Local Affairs in the previous government and previously held the position of Secretary of State for Fisheries. The Prime Minister is also an international expert in agriculture and agricultural policies for the United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the European Commission. Mr. Angel Gurría - Secretary-General - OECD Mr. Gurría is the OECD Secretary-General since 2006. The Secretary-General has held two ministerial posts in Mexico before joining the OECD - Minister of Foreign Affairs (1994-1998) and Minister of Finance and Public Credit (1998- 2000). Mr. Gurría chaired the International Task Force on Financing Water for All and is a member of several international initiatives, including the United Nations Secretary General Advisory Board, World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Water Security, International Advisory Board of Governors of the Centre for International Governance Innovation, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Divide? an Assessment of Elections in Sri Lanka and the Palestinian Territories
    Bridging the Divide? An Assessment of Elections in Sri Lanka and the Palestinian Territories Authors Michael Balz, Morgan Courtney, Nathan Hodson, Lena Hull, Seth Lynn, Eric Melancon, Julia Morse, Bill Parsons, Arian Sharifi, Sehar Tariq Project Advisor Jeff Fischer January 2010 About the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs was founded at Princeton in 1930, created in the spirit of President Woodrow Wilson’s interest in preparing students for leadership in public and international affairs. The Woodrow Wilson School has celebrated over 75 years of preparing talented individuals for careers in the service of the nation and the world. Today, the School educates a wide range of students from the U.S. and around the world who seek to apply their knowledge and skills to the solution of vital public problems in both the domestic and international realms. About Graduate Policy Workshops Graduate Policy Workshops are a unique part of the curriculum of the School’s graduate program. Workshops provide students with an opportunity to use what they have learned from their first year in the program, their summer work, and their other experiences to analyze a complex and challenging policy issue. The workshops emphasize policy implementation, and it is this that distinguishes it from regular coursework. The goal of the workshops is not just to understand a policy issue, but to devise policy recommendations that are both creative and realistic, given the relevant institutional and political constraints. All views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors. The authors take full responsibility for any errors or omissions in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Forecast
    October 2020 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 2 In Hindsight: The Annual Report to the General Assembly - Russia holds the presidency in October. Much to that, Council members will meet on the mis- Can It Be Improved? of the Council’s work is likely to remain remote sion’s work and developments in Western Sahara. 3 Status Update since our due to COVID-19 restrictions, although an effort Several other African issues are on the pro- September Forecast is underway to hold several meetings on UN gramme. Meetings are anticipated on: 5 Libya premises. • the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in 7 Comprehensive Review Russia will hold a debate focusing on a com- the Democratic Republic of the Congo; of the Situation in the prehensive review of the peace and security situa- • the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabili- Gulf Region tion in the Persian Gulf region under the agenda zation Mission in Mali; 8 Colombia item “Maintenance of international peace and • the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabili- security”. This signature event appears to have zation Mission in the Central African Repub- 10 UNDOF (Golan Heights) grown out of a concept for the region that Rus- lic; and 11 Haiti sia proposed in 2019. Secretary-General António • the UN Interim Security Force for Abyei. 12 Syria Guterres is a possible briefer. Briefings are planned on the work of the 1533 14 Democratic Republic of Two open debates are also anticipated late in DRC Sanctions Committee and the 751 Somalia the Congo the month. The quarterly open debate on “The Sanctions Committee. 16 Mali situation in the Middle East, including the Pales- Special Envoy for the Great Lakes Region tinian Question” is expected to feature a briefing Huang Xia is also scheduled to provide his bian- 17 Western Sahara by Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace nual briefing to the Council in October on the 19 Yemen Process Nickolay Mladenov.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants in the UNESCO Virtual Online Ministerial Dialogue COVID‐ 19 and ‘Open Science’ International Scientific Collaboration
    List of participants in the UNESCO Virtual Online Ministerial Dialogue COVID‐ 19 and ‘Open Science’ International scientific collaboration 30 March 2020 Region Country Title Level Minister of Higher Education, Science, AFR Angola Technology and Innovation Minister Directeur du Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Animale et de AFR Benin Technologie des Viandes Central African Ministre de la Recherche scientifique AFR Republic et de l'Innovation Technologique Minister Ministre de l'Educatoin Nationale de AFR Comoros l'Union des Comores, Minister Directeur de la promotion des Langues , Ministere de l'Education AFR Comoros nationale Democratic Republic of Vice-ministre enseignement primaire AFR the Congo secondaire et technique Deputy Minister Spatial Epidemiologist and AFR Eswatini Biostatistician. Ministry of Science and Higher AFR Ethiopia Education, Minister Ministre de l' Éducation Nationale de AFR Gabon la République Gabonaise. Minister du Ministre de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et du Transfert des AFR Gabon Technologies du Gabon . Minister Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Research, Science AFR Gambia and Technology AFR Ghana Minister of Science and Technology Minister Deputy Minister of Environment, AFR Ghana Science, Technology & Innovation Deputy Minister Ministre de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche scientifique de la AFR Guinea République de Guinée Minister Guinea Ministro de Educación Enseñanza AFR Equatorial Universitaria y Deportarte Minister Principal Secretary at the State Department for Early Learning and AFR Kenya Basic Education Assistant Minister for Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, AFR Liberia Liberia Deputy Minister The Hon Vice Prime Minister, Minister of Education, Tertiary Education, AFR Mauritius Science and Technology Minister and Vice PM Ministro da Ciência e Tecnologia, Ensino Superior e Técnico AFR Mozambique Profissional Minister on.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Presidentialism in Comparative and Historical Perspective
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2010 Latin American Presidentialism in Comparative and Historical Perspective Tom Ginsburg Jose Antonio Cheibub Zachary Elkins Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Tom Ginsburg, Jose Antonio Cheibub & Zachary Elkins, "Latin American Presidentialism in Comparative and Historical Perspective," 89 Texas Law Review 1707 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Latin American Presidentialism in Comparative and Historical Perspective Jos6 Antonio Cheibub, Zachary Elkins" & Tom Ginsburg*** Since the time of Aristotle, comparative scholars have developed various alternative typologies to classify constitutional systems., One paradigmatic scheme focuses on executive-legislative relations. Some systems,2 we are told, are "presidential," in which a directly elected president serves a fixed term as both head of state and head of government. Others are "parliamentary," in which a legislative majority determines who will lead the government and for how long. A third model combines features of the two and is called "semi-presidential." 3 Each of these models of "government type" has an archetype: The United States is seen as the quintessential presidential system,4 the United Kingdom as the parliamentary model,5 and France as the semi-presidential model.6 The models are also seen as systemic, in that each implies a certain institutional configuration. So, presidential systems are thought to include a host of features (e.g., an executive veto) that are not typically found in * Professor of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Meaning of Executive Power†
    PRAKASH.DOC 9/12/2003 1:37 PM THE ESSENTIAL MEANING OF EXECUTIVE POWER† Saikrishna Prakash* Scholars disagree about the Executive Power Clause’s meaning. Some scholars claim that the clause does not vest any power but in- stead establishes the title and number for the apex of the executive branch. Others believe that the clause vests power but are unsure what domestic power it might vest. This article seeks to resolve the dispute by shedding light on the essential, historical meaning of ex- ecutive power. Although “executive power” was often used to en- compass a bundle of powers typically enjoyed by the executive branch, such as foreign relations control and the power to appoint, the phrase most often was used as a shorthand for the power to exe- cute the laws. Indeed, the phrase “executive power” comes from the principal or essential power of an executive—the power to execute the law. Evidence from the eighteenth century reveals this essential mean- ing of executive power. European political theorists of that era de- clared that the executive power was the power to execute the laws. In America, state constitutions and political commentators employed this basic definition. Debates at the Philadelphia and state ratifying conventions also confirm this meaning, with framers and ratifiers re- peatedly observing that the President could execute the law by virtue of the executive power. Finally, after ratification, statesmen from all three branches understood that the executive power was the power to execute the laws. The founders understood that at least two subsidiary authorities flowed from the power to execute the law.
    [Show full text]