<<

Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale

Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library School of Medicine

1968 Association of hand anomalies with congenital lesions in mentally retarded, state- institutionalized patients Marian Grace Jordison Yale University

Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl

Recommended Citation Jordison, Marian Grace, "Association of hand anomalies with congenital heart lesions in mentally retarded, state-institutionalized patients" (1968). Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. 2756. http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl/2756

This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Medicine at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. YALE MEDICAL LIBRARY

9002 01065 5752

seek ^ j IptxL-ffij y Li: Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from The National Endowment for the Humanities and the Arcadia Fund

https://archive.org/details/associationofhanOOjord

ASSOCIATION OF HAND ANOMALIES WITH CONGENITAL HEART LESIONS IN MENTALLY RETARDED, STATE- INSTITUTIONALIZED PATIENTS

Marian Grace Jordison

B.A. Stanford University, 1964

A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine

Department of Epidemiology & Public Health Yale University School of Medicine

April, 1968 y/3. TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Introduction. 1

Review of the literature. 3 I. Holt-Oram . 3 II. Epidemiology of congenital malformations. 6 A. Incidence. 6 B. Increased risks of death associated with congenital malformations. 8 III. Congenital heart malformations.12 A. Incidence and prevalence.12 B. Evidence for and against genetic factors.17 1. Combinations of cardiac malformations.17 2. Consanguinity.18 3. Concordance.2 0 4. Risk of recurrence in a family.....20 5. Parental age.22 6. Birth rank.25 7. Season of birth.25 8. Chromosome studies...*.26 9 . Summary.2 7 IV. Upper extremity malformations.29 A. Incidence.29 B. Genetic factors.31 1. Racial differences.31 2. Parental age.31 3. Mode of transmission.31 V. Association of hand and heart malformations .... 33 A. Incidence.33 B. lesions.36

Specific Aims of this Investigation.39

Material and Methods. 42 I. Identification of Subjects....42 II. Selection of Subjects. 43 III. Procedure for Making and Recording Observations.4 3

Results.... 6 3

Discussion. 68

Summary.71

Appendix I.73

Bibliography..90 .srb- io wsivsH .. . . sniolfcnYe r;is^O-^IoH .1

.III

i so stsiH

.ddiiH

. „ . . . afr.i. rw: s amosomoirlD . ..’.fienrinruS

.sonsbionl .A DiisasO

IsJ’-ns- si s.sai jT!3n£ :r d; 1 o sbol 1 . E ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Without the help of many interested persons, this study could have never reached fruition. The author is very grateful for the advice and assistance of those who have aided her in this research.

My sincerest thanks go to:

Dr. William O'Brien, who as Assistant Professor of

Epidemiology and Medicine helped in the formulation and design of the study, Dr. Roy Acheson, Professor of

Epidemiology and Medicine and California State Department of Health Research Consultant, who served as project super¬ visor, Dr. John Currie, Research Associate in Biometry, who read and advised on the thesis, Dr. Robert Dyar, Chief of Research Training for the State of California Department of Public Health, who headed the Epidemiology Training Pro¬ gram, Dr. Robert Day, Deputy Director of California State

Department of Public Health, who served as project preceptor,

Dr. Barbara Corley, Chief of Medicine at Sonoma State Hospital, who served as project preceptor and personally evaluated each patient. Dr. Evelyn Siris, Chief of Radiology at Sonoma

State Hospital, whose department graciously did the x-ray examinations, Dr. Joseph O'Neil, Superintendent of Sonoma

State Hospital, Dr. W.B. Read, Associate Superintendent of

Sonoma State Hospital, and Dr. Charles McKean, Director of

Research of Sonoma State Hospital, all of whom assisted in

the arrangements which made it possible for this research to .ri03S989i sii'Lt ni isri babis

. :. j• co s>'neri:? .)©*1 sonis v;14

.tiG t anoi^snimsxs

i 3 .ia , lEitiqscl a3a3': smonoS

pId^esbsH be done at Sonoma State Hospital, Mrs. Stedman, whose secretarial assistance was far beyond the call of duty,

Mrs. Bray, who promptly completed all the electrocardiograms,

Mrs. Evans, whose nursing skills aided with patients' evaluation, Mrs. Boening and the other members of the

Medical Records Department who typed the dictations, to the many technicians of Sonoma State Hospital who assisted in the surveys, to the Bart Stedmans for taking me into their home, and to my parents for their love and support. Ljj.i? £ non o 2 3o ansioinxiosJ-

3YSV3U8 srW lisrIJ io'i aJns^Bq Yra &nfi »9-mori WITH LOVE AND THANKS

to MARCIA

INTRODUCTION

It is a well known clinical axiom that the finding of one congenital anomaly should alert the physician to look further for other possible defects. In addition, certain external congenital malformations seem to be associated with specific internal malformations. Illustrating this point are the associations of low set ears with renal anomalies and the single umbilical artery with renal and cardiac anomalies.

Holt and Oram (1960) reported the association of with deformities of the radial segment of the upper extremity. These findings seemed logical when one recalled the simultaneous embryogenesis of the upper limb and the heart.

Thus, the author proposed to test the hypothesis that patients with hand anomalies would be more apt to have a congenital heart malformation. Furthermore, one would like, if possible, to delineate the associations between specific types of hand abnormalities and particular kinds of congenita cardiac defects to aid the physician in diagnosis.

Many babies born twenty-five years ago with severe congenital heart malformation did not live long enough even to begin school. However, with the recent progress in , most children with congenital heart disease can be markedly palliated, if not totally corrected, as long as surgery is done before irreversible pulmonary fibrotic MOITDUaOHTMI

VLbmoob iB^xnspnoo sno

. ^X.LBfnOfl6 OBlblBO 2 changes have begun.

As many congenital heart defects are not apparent at birth, it would be most useful for the physician examining the newborn if he were to know that an easily visible hand malformation was a signal to evaluate this child carefully at periodic intervals for evidence of congenital heart anomalies so that any disease found might be corrected before pulmonary makes repair impossible. .rujpsci ever! aopn£/io

. noo : j sonebivs- eleven* oiboiisq is

>(BfTT noisneit^qYrf W«omIi/q REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

I. Holt-Oram Syndrome

The Holt-Oram syndrome is one in which cardiac and upper extremity anomalies are transmitted together as a specific entity in an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance

The attached pedigree charts and tables detail the specific lesions which have been described in the thirteen pedigrees reported to date by eleven authors. (See Appendix I).

This entity appears to be transmitted as a dominant, in that it is manifested in the heterozygote. The numerous examples of transmission from father to son rule out sex- linkage .

The chromosomes were normal in nineteen of twenty-one individuals whose are described in these studies.

Massaumi et*al. (1966) found a minor aberration in chromosome sixteen which was identical in two propositi in two different families. This abnormality consisted of a secondary constriction in the short arm of the No. 16 chromosome setting off a bar-like satellite. However, these variants are known to exist in normal populations (German et.al. 1966).

As the tables in Appendix I detail, the cardiac mal¬

formations ranged over a wide variety in the fifty-seven individuals who were diagnosed as having a specific defect.

3 [I' ITM3TIJ 3HT 30 waivm

.'id rioijiw aaoi«9l

- • 3 C I . I 3 4

Anomaly Clinical Proved

Atrial septal defect 12 23 Ventricular septal defect 5 14 Patent 2 Endocardial cushion defect 1 Pulmonary (valvular and peripheral) 1 1 Patent 4 Anomalous right subclavian artery 4 Anomalous left vena cava 3 Transposition of the great vessels 1 Anomalous coronary circulation 2

By far the most common malformation was atrial septal defect, occurring in 61% (35/57), with ventricular septal defect in 33% (19/57). Atrial and ventricular septal defects were both present in four individuals (7%).

About 58% of those affected with congenital heart disease were females. Females were also much more likely to have developed from their disease

(eight females, but only one male).

Arrhythmias ranged from sinus bradycardia with a long

P-R interval and nodal escape to markedly bizarre arrhythmias with atrial-ventricular conduction defect. These arrhythmias were often intermittent. The arrhythmias were generally milder in males (usually consisted of increased

P-R interval), where they tended to be more unusual and pronounced in the females.

Skeletal anomalies were as minimal as slight of the thumbs to severe malformations of the entire upper extremity. The radial portion of the hand or forearm was doadsb lBdq92 iBixdA

doslob noirfauo leib^Boobna

atfaoiif j-HB aadoub ifsads^ 'icdifi ri£xv£ iock/B dripii .gi/oIsmonA

1&329V d£9xp odd do noxiiaoqanBiT nc isIc/D^ io xisnoioo euoIbihoiA

•3L'C : ni dnsagxq ridod 5 usually the malformed segment. The anomaly tended to be more severe on the left side, in that the left thumb was often absent whereas the right thumb was a fingerlike digit.

Again, skeletal involvement, especially in the hands, was more marked in females.

Within the same family pedigree, the cardias and skeletal anomalies of members of the same sex were usually very sim¬ ilar, even though the cardiac and upper extremity anomalies varied markedly within the pedigree. Females were generally more seriously handicapped. < ria o d°, am lo asilc/nonB

9i d nirt^iw vlbs^iem b9±:fsv

bnBr "Isrjoiisa saom II. Epidemiology of congenital malformations

A. Incidence

There are several problems inherent in using the epidemiological and statistical method to investigate possible etiologies of or diseases. For example, the same cause can give rise to many different lesions, e.g. maternal early in may produce , ventricular septal defect, or other congenital heart disease. Conversely, different agents often produce the same constellation of malformations, e.g. patent ductus arteriosus produced by maternal rubella or transmitted familially.

When compiling statistics about the incidence of congenital anomalies, one must remember that many with defects will be spontaneously aborted, while others will survive despite serious malformations. Potter (I960) has estimated that at least 20% of all conceptions terminate before reporting of fetal death becomes mandatory and has stated that in the first trimester it is extremely rare to recover a normal .

Despite these difficulties, there seems to be general agreement that world-wide about one child in forty is born with a major malformation that is noted on the hospital record and requires medical attention (Lamy et.al., 1960;

Warkany et. al., 1961; Carter, 1963; British Medical

Journal, 1965). The Fetal Life Study at Columbia University

6 r o asipoIoij9 sldisBoq

ii:,I .orfaaoc 9ift6s erid souboiq fcsddo

dn9d£q .p.s

rtyoae soids. de>;}s pn ilxqjnoo nsfiV*/

, a--..-ii> . ,-ts le^inepnoo

sm auoixsa sJiqasb svivius

L r ;.ro s x svoo91; od 7 has shown that this rate of 2% to 3% is doubled if the observation period is increased to one year (McIntosh et. al.,

1954). But even this 5% figure does not include those

anomalies which do not necessarily manifest until child¬ hood or adulthood (e.g. cardiac or visceral).

Although the total incidence of all malformations seems to be about the same in various races, the relative

frequencies of the individual defects which go to make the total differ greatly among ethnic groups and places.

Examples of these markedly increased incidences include polydactyly in Negroes, dislocated hips in Lapps, cleft lip and palate in Japanese, and anencephaly and spina bifida in Ireland, Scotland, and south Wales (Carter, 1963) .

Further evidence for variations among the individual anomalies is found in differential sex ratios. At birth there is an increased male sex ratio among babies with malformations when compared to all births (Lamy et. al., 1960)

McIntosh et.al. (1954) found that in liveborn infants

surviving more than one month the incidence of congenital malformations was markedly greater in males; 8.4% of all

liveborn males and 5.5% of liveborn females had congenital

anomalies. Furthermore, this increased male sex ratio held for both white and non-white groups; 7.4% of white males, 9.7% of non-white males, 5.2% of white females, and

5.9% of non-white females had congenital abnormalities.

Yet, monstrosities, spina bifida, and meningocoeles -31&1 airti 3£>rt3 n wort a ssrf

'ii&m eesrfi 3:o aslq/nsxa qin bed’BOoi'a ib

bne , bnelrtoc 8 predominate in females whereas circulatory, digestive, and urogenital abnormalities are more prevalent in males

(Lamy et.al., 1960).

B. Increased risks of death associated with congenital

malformations

Universally the presence of a congenital malformation has deleterious effects in being associated with increased spontaneous abortion, prematurity, and mortality. Wallace et. al. (1953) found the incidence of congenital anomalies doubled in prematures (18.2/1000 livebirths) compared to full-term infants (8.3/1000 livebirths). McIntosh et. al.

(1954) confirmed that liveborn infants weighing 2500 grams or less had a significantly increased incidence of defect

(9.7%) over those weighing more than 2500 grams (6.7%).

Wallace et.al. (1953) in New York City established that the death rate for premature babies with congenital mal¬ formations (372/1000 livebirths) was threefold that for all prematures and the mortality rate for full-term infants with congenital anomalies (92/1000 livebirths) was thirteen¬ fold that for all full-term deliveries. Stevenson et.al. (1950 and McIntosh et.al. (1954) have also confirmed these in¬ creased risks:

Category Malformed Total Number Percentage

Stillbirths 787 125 15.9% Babies dying in less than 10 days 638 84 13.2 Babies living 27,599 468 1.7 Totals 29,024 677 2.3% (Stevenson et. al., 1950)

9

Category Malformed Total Number Percentage

Antepartum deaths 81 11 13.6% Intrapartum deaths 30 7 23.3 Neonatal deaths (within thirty days) 98 29 29.6 Live births (excluding neonatal deaths) 5,530 386 7.0 Totals 5,739 433 7.5% (McIntosh et.al. 1954)

Most of these demises occur soon after birth. Lamy et.al. (1960) stated that about 50% of all deaths directly due to congenital malformations occur within the first month of life and about 80% happen within the first year.

Wallace et.al. (1953) found that neonatal deaths due to congenital anomalies constituted 15% of New York City neo¬ natal death certificates. The neonatal mortality rate of those born with congenital defects was 145/1000 livebirths, an eightfold increase of the citywide mortality rate for all livebirths.

Carter (1963) has noted that in England and Wales since 1900 the infant mortality due to congenital mal¬ formations has remained constant at 4 to 6 per thousand, while the total infant mortality fell dramatically during the same period from 130 per thousand to 20 per thousand.

Kretchmer (1964) has emphasized that congenital mal¬ formations are not only the major cause of death of infants, but remain among the first ten causes of death up to age thirty-five. His table demonstrates that up to age twenty

five it is the only category of death always ranking among niridiw) 8rid£9b IsdBno9M

(arid-sab Isdsnoan

.Lb.

rfjiw fiiod asorii

■ 10 the first five in an area such as California where are a relatively uncommon cause of death in infancy and childhood.

LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH - CALIFORNIA, 1960* >4 G 0 p CO CJ> •H •oG •H •H P i—1 P(N i—1 4-1 G 0• G -p >4-1 0 G, G CO -p H M IL a 1 G P -HCN P • >1 Poo rd G P g• 0 co P P G 0 £ N -H rd 0 >iOio X G P 0 CLG ^ G < CO LO • •H ■H -M •H •H 1-1 G G i—1 i—i Pd G H U S G o u 0 G 0 l •H (L 0 p g 0 cm G G p 1—1 1—1 00 CO 1—1 00 i—1 CO o CO 1— co 00 • • • • » *H -H CLP-lr-) 1—1 3 G 0 •H 1—1 g 0 M-l i—i a ■p H fL PQ D LT) Pd u G < E G CO 0 C G N -H 0 G rtf 0 P p O G P g P G CO G O P G G -H G o 0 p tP (1)l—1 0 o o 0 G P ■ i •H Pd 0 0 P O 0 E co 11 i—1 r-~ 00 CT\ ID i—1 KO • • • • i—1 LO -H 00 ■H •H o CM -H Pd • •H ■ H Pd i—1 G Osl pd co a < G E +J C/d U U O ID O E U • 0 0 • E 0 CD G 0 0 • P P CD P 0 0 P 00 o G P G O 0 p 1 1 o oo • *H ■H ■H 1—1 o o O i—1 G G 1- i—1 o o o o o G pd -p G G Pi -p 0 p 0 p 0 0 p 0 P >i p p p 0 p cl > P 0 0 CO p 0 P 0 P 0 G 0 P c a) P O G 0 P p cl 0 CL CL P • «. - >4 G G

• rEVDIMe CVnSEg OL DEVJJI - CVriECWiIV k TdCO* III. Congenital heart malformations

A. Incidence and prevalence

As cardiac defects are not usually manifest at birth and may become apparent as late as adulthood, good estimates of their incidence are difficult to obtain. Furthermore, the method of ascertainment markedly influences the figure obtained for incidence. Retrospective studies based on physicians reporting defects found to a registry usually find a lower figure than that obtained from a prospective study where physicians do physical examinations on each child looking for defects. Furthermore, the longer the follow-up period with reexaminations the more apt is a cardiac malformation to manifest itself in symptoms or signs.

MacMahon, McKeown, and Record (1953) in a retrospective study of 199,418 births in Birmingham, England, using all available clinical records, all autopsies, and the register of stillbirths and deaths found an incidence of 3.2 cases of congenital heart disease per thousand total births and felt that this figure slightly underestimated the true incidence. McKeown and Record (1960) in a prospective series of 56,760 births in Birmingham using birth information extracted from antenatal and birth records, observations on each child made for the next five years by the "health visitor," and death certificates obtained an incidence for cardiac malformations of 4.18 per thousand births. Harris and Steinberg (1954) doing two physical examinations on all

8,716 consecutive newborns in Rochester, Minnesota, (a

12 .Ill

• A

d' dluoiddxb 9X6 ©onsbionx -xxsrfd do

xd-Q9q.9ori9bxDni sol ->enxfiddo

do dsrld nerld siupid X9WoI £

£.n/.XioX9 Isoxa^riq oh aoexo.leY^q sisriw

i

’ rFi hue, y a jo 9 Mr. 1 , riorff Mofill

' 13 white population) found congenital heart lesions in 7.0 per thousand births. McIntosh et.al. (1954) in the

Columbia University Fetal Life Study of 5,964 seen before the fourth month, resulting in 6,053 infants examined at birth, six months, and one year, or autopsied, obtained an incidence of 5.5 per thousand livebirths and

8.1 per thousand total births. Carlgren (1959) using the

Gothenburg, Sweden, maternity hospitals with two physical examinations on each newborn (58,105 newborns) the city's cardiac clinic with seven to sixteen year follow-up, and the city's necropsy results found an incidence of 6.4 per thou¬ sand livebirths.

Higgins (1965) estimated the incidence of congenital heart disease in the United States to be about five per thousand births, which means that at least 20,000 babies are born each year with cardiac malformations. The pre¬ valence is usually about two per thousand in a school-age population. Professor Maurice Campbell (1965) , drawing on a lifetime's experience in with a personal series of over one thousand cases and citing the more recent recent studies, stated that cardiac malformations have an incidence of at least six per thousand livebirths and pointed out that they account for about one-fourth of all develop¬ mental anomalies, equalling in frequency the major abnorma¬ lities of the central nervous system, i.e. anencephaly, hydrocephaly, and spina bifida, all taken together. Dai as .bsaiBido

eleitqaci \’3in:tsd£m xn9b9w8 xpxudnsridoG

■ 14

Columbia University's Fetal Life Study found the foll¬ owing distribution of cardiac malformations among infants diagnosed as having congenital heart disease in the first year of life:

Cardiovascular system anomaly Liveborn Stillborn and (33 infants)neonatal deaths (16 infants)

Tetralogy of Fallot 3 2 Patent ductus arteriosus 6 Other malformations of ductus arteriosus - 2 Coarctation of aorta 1 - Right-sided aorta 2 1 Other malformations of great vessels 1 9 Malformations of valves: Aortic - 2 Pulmonary 1 1 Septal defects 3 2 Malformations of coronary vessels 1 1 Endocardial fibrosis 2 1 Miscellaneous - 2 Unclassified congenital heart disease 22 1 Total malformations 42 27

(McIntosh et.al., 1954)

The relative prevalence of specific lesions changes greatly because of the significant early mortality, especially during the first yeaj:, in spite of cardiac surgical advances.

At birth, ventricular septal defects account for about

20%, patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, pulmonary stenosis (generally valvular), , and transposition of the great vessels each comprise about 10% and about 5%. The remaining 15% are compsed of much less common : 9ixl J.O 1£9V

tolls'? 'io Y£0Ib^9T

B^IOB bsbxa-xtfipxH + axp o snoi^BnrcolIsm xeriiO

O x j1-6 &

j-.ts ri Ie J iinsr ,ioo baxitxaselonU

:xB9 ^neoilcnpiE srtt ito 15

lesions. Transposition of the great vessels has a very

high early mortality. Ventricular septal defect and

coarctation of the aorta become less prevalent among those

surviving past one year. During childhood ventricular

septal defect, atrial septal defect, patent ductus arterio¬

sus , and pulmonary valvular stenosis each comprise about

15%, tetralogy of Fallot about 12%, and coarctation of the

aorta and aortic stenosis each about 6% (Campbell, 1965) .

The sex ratio of children with congenital heart disease has only a slightly increased preponderance of males:

53% (MacMahon et.al., 1953) and 55% (Carlgren, 1959) .

For individual anomalies, however, the sex ratio does

differ appreciably from chance and sometimes there also seems

to be a differential mortality:(See next page).

Patent ductus arteriosus is the only condition which

is more common in the female sex at birth and remains so

throughout life. Coarctation of the aorta shows an equal

incidence at birth . Polani (Campbell, 1965) has Suggested

that the increased mortality in females with coarctation is

possibly because coarctation is often associated with

Turner's syndrome and the mortality from Turner's syndrome

in the neonatal period is known to be high.

has an equal incidence at birth and continues so. Tetralogy

of Fallot and transposition of the great vessels are more

common in males at birth and show no evidence of a differ¬

ential mortality after infancy. .snoissl

Y^nomlxjq bas ,aus

liOES ciXSO*'9d£; OX^IOi

bne (£2ei

on wrris bns ridiid ie eolem ni noramoo Condition Percentage of Males oo 1 0) P p co tn rd P rd (DC cmmploi £ d 0 3 CO rH p >1 ■H OM ac o 00 i—1 d -p -p -p -p Pa o co (d 0) P Pa O •H CO CM O CO UO UO m -P -P -p U 0 rd P p 0 rd p o (d 0 rd CO UO LD o *1 ■H -p -p < CO co a) p O (0 0 p o 1 1 "vF cr\ •rH UO U0 r-1 -p Pa to P rd co a) p o (0 e -p o P >i >H P 1 1 U0 CO •H uo O uo ■—i d m -P -p > CD a CD rd CD C P O P rd p CO a c CD CO CO o o CO 1—1 rH m 1— 1— -p -P tP Eh 0 (D P rd o 0 tr> w •H -H CO 1—1 00 CO cp -P -p Eh CO CO CD CD CO O P 0 p CD rd P P to Pa 0 tn > rd 1 1 i—1 C\] •rH d P CD p P 0 £ o 0 P CD rd rd rd rd • . 16 -— — p •H 0 l—1 ■H d I—1 -p cc d CO • UO d CD •H 4H oc P d d -P iH CJ rH d uo 0) CO c U 4H -P 0) « -p -p to CD P 0 0) CD P P O rd £ d rd 0) to P id1 P co a-p P s 0 rd £ p CD 0 CD rd . CD • d •H ■H 1—1 d to P £ a) >i 00 — — p KT 0) •H £ i—i to iH P OO CD CO 4-1 -P CO -P (D ■P EH (D a) o d P CD to CO CD P CD rd . a • CD *rH i—1 •rH 1— d d ■H d 4-1 >, CD P o P £ rd P 0 P to P P CD p a P (0 p CD to p «. H1 d —' ,—s 1— 1— 1—1 O'! CO UO u £ CD rd a L-> co

ro

I qj ru t? QJ P") to o u

ru O 17

Campbell (1965) advances an interesting argument to explain the reversal of the male excess in ventricular septal defect. He found that in 180 cases of ventricular septal defect with a larger number of boys at birth, 57% of the boys were still living who were born since 1940, but only

27% of the boys were still alive who were born before 1940.

He also noted that boys reversed their left-to-right shunt, became cyanotic, and died at an earlier age than girls did.

He suggested this was probably because boys are less willing than girls to limit their activity and feels that this reasoning explains the differential mortality in both ventricular and atrial septal defect.

These suggestions of the prominent British cardiologists,

Professors Polani and Campbell, seem to me very reasonable explanations for the differential mortality of coarctations of the aorta and atrial and ventricular septal defects.

B. Evidence for and against genetic factors

1. Combinations of cardiac malformations

What is the evidence for genetic factors contributing

to congenital heart disease? We have already seen that while the incidence of congenital malformations is essentially

the same in all races and places, the incidence of specific

anomalies varies widely.

Even when known constellations of lesions, e.g. tetra¬

logy of Fallot, are excluded, it has been shown that when p-r-q92 iBitis bne isluox^rtnsv

3noii89pp0 ' oaaiiT llr:b . 0 Lib infilo^ sioassloi'I 18 a patient has one congenital heart anomaly, he is much more

likely to have a second than expected by chance. In

Campbell's experience (1965), in an average of all the acyanotic groups, 13% had a second lesion, a twenty-fold increase in the expected probability. These acyanotic groups included known associations such as aortic stenosis or patent ductus arteriosus with coarctation of the aorta, but excluded the anomalies of ventricular septal defect and pulmonary valvular stenosis which are associated in most cyanotic congenital heart disease.

2. Consanguinity

Campbell (1965) found a two-to-three fold increase of first-cousin marriages in his patients with congenital heart disease (1.1% compared to 0.4-0.5% of first-cousin marriage in general population of Britain). This increased consanguinity was highest and probably significant in and , which may be determined in an autosomal recessive pattern. In 379 collected cases of situs inversus, 5.3% were the result of first-cousin marriage, an eleven-fold increase over the general population.

Lamy et.al. (1957) calculated the average coefficient of relationship of the parents of the proposit,i, C = E (1/2) n, where n equals number of links in an ancestral chain joining the two parents and passing through a common ancestor, and where the summation is over all the different paths connecting

19

the parents. The average coefficient of relationship was

3.6 times higher in the series with all types of congenital

heart disease compared to a randomly selected control group

(C = 2.460 for their series of 1188 sibships with a pro¬

positus with congenital heart lesion as compared to

C=0.6748 for a random control of 660 sibships of propositi

without congenital heart malformation, with the two groups

matched as regards age of index cases, social and familial

background, etc.). When the average coefficient of relation¬

ship was calculated for specific kinds of congenital heart

lesions, it was again highest in situs inversus (18.170) and

dextrocardia (10.420).

These authors further compared the entire group of

1188 sibships with a propositus with congenital cardiac

malformation to the subgroup of 28 sibships from consanguineous

matings where the index case had congenital heart defect.

(1) There was no significant difference in the prevalence

of congenital heart disease in a sib of the propositus in

these two groups (prevalence was 7.1% in the subgroup of

consanguineous matings compared to 2.5% for the entire group).

(2) The propositus had another malformation in addition to k congenital heart defect in 17.8% of both groups, so consanguinity

did not appear to increase the number of malformations

possessed by a single individual. (3) A sibling of the

propositus had a malformation other than congenital cardiac

disease in 10.7% of consanguineous matings as compared to -

lioiiffs >noo iuorl^iw 20 0.93% of the entire group, a significant difference (p^0.05).

(4) Excluding the propositi, the frequency of all individuals exhibiting congenital heart disease or another malformation was 17.8% in consanguineous sibships as compared to 2.7% of all sibships, a difference again significant at the p^O.05 level. Thus these authors concluded that consanguinity inc¬ reased the frequency of all malformations and only secondarily the frequency of congenital heart malformations.

In summary, then, consanguinity seems to be of importance in situs inversus and dextrocardia, both of which may be determined in an autosomal recessive pattern and where consanguinity would then increase the chance of producing a homozygote who would phenotypically express the defect.

3. Concordance

The concordance for monzygotic twins for a strictly genetic disorder should approximate 100%.

However, the concordance for monozygotic twins for congenital heart disease is low and about the same as con¬ cordance for dizygotic twins (Uchida et.al., 1957; Carter,

1963) .

4. Risk of recurrence in a family

This risk of recurrence in a sib born after the propositus with congenital heart defect is low, but it is still increased over the general population. ^nsbiooaoD srIT blur da sbioaib oxisnsp

_ 21

McKeown et.al. (1953) found an incidence of 18/1000 births

of congenital heart defects in sibs born after a propositus with congenital cardiac anomaly compared to an incidence of

congenital heart lesion of 3.2/1000 births in the general population, a six-fold increase. Campbell (1965) found a

1.7% incidence of congenital heart abnormality in sibs of propositi with congenital cardiac malformation, a three¬

fold increased chance compared to the general British population (0.6%). These figures were not corrected for

family size, but it is well known that parents often limit

the size of their family after a child is born with a malformation. Thus one might expect that instead of a

large family, which would increase the probability of a

second child with defect being born by chance alone, that

these were smaller families.

Furthermore, Campbell found the same defect as that of

the propositus about 15 to 20 times as often as would be expected; 0.95% of sibs have the same abnormality as opposed

to the 0.06% expectation by chance of having the same anomaly

(expectation is even less for the more unusual anomalies).

Anderson (1954) confirmed the strong tendency in patent

ductus arteriosus for the recurrent heart defect to be

identical. Wood (1958) in a consecutive series of 1250

patients with congenital cardiac disease found that when

congenital heart anomalies occurred in more than one member

of a family (which happened in 5% of the cases), it was Xfidinspnoo ndiw idxsocroiiq

:i dud rosis

i i s rid do 9sia arid

“• d es eioni. bluow rioiiiv

i-Ltfffil dSllBOIS 319W 039fii

£ BO.0 slid od 22 nearly always of the same kind. This held true whether the lesion was patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, aortic stenosis, pulmonic stenosis, tetralogy of Fallot, or familial cardiomegaly.

There seems to be no increased incidence of congenital heart malformations in parents of children with congenital cardiac lesions (McKeown et.al., 1953 ; Campbell, 1965) .

However, it must be remembered that before the advent of cardiac surgery, patients with defects such as tranposition of the great vessels never survived long enough to become parents.

5 . Parental age

What are the effects of increased parental age in congenital heart disease? The effect of increased maternal age in predisposing to Down's syndrome and the association of Down's syndrome with endocardial cushion defect and septal defects is well known. MacMahon (1952) found that when birth rank was held constant, there was a preponderance in the maternal age group 38-48 for births of infants with congenital cardiac malformation, and this increase was significantly higher than controls. However, when known Down's syndrome patients were excluded (and the ascertainment of patients with Down's syndrome was probably not complete), the difference was reduced considerably and was no longer significant. - -4 23

Lamy et.al. (1957) found that neither the mean maternal

age for the congenital heart anomaly group (28.39 years)

was significantly different from the control (28.84 years)

nor was the mean paternal age for the congenital cardiac

defect group (31.13 years) significantly different from

the control (30.80 years). Campbell (1965) found that the mean age of all mothers of children with various types of

congenital heart lesions was no greater than would be

expected (between 28.47 and 29.35 years) when compared to

the general population of Britain. In Ehlers and Engle's

study (1966) neither the mean maternal age nor the mean

paternal age had any effect on the presence of congenital

cardiac disease.

Thus, increased maternal age is important in pre¬

disposing to chromosomal non-disjunction and thus to pro¬

ducing a baby with Down's syndrome with trisomy of

chromosome 21, which often has endocardial cushion defect with atrial septal defect, secundum type, and ventricular

septal defect associated. When children with Down's syndrome

are excluded from the total group with congenital heart

defect, increased maternal age does not seem to be important

in producing children with congenital heart malformation.

Penrose has suggested that instead of just computing

the increase in the mean maternal age, it is more useful to

calculate the difference between the means of the paternal

and maternal ages, since an undue excess of the paternal age -

dvs l&meJ&q n&s i sitd asw ion

[L Jnr: o id xripx 2 (e'xb;-w £. I. I£ ) qt/onp josisb

. (ai69v 08.0£) loxd-noo arid- ddxw ngnblirio do ai3xIdoni Us do 9pB nesin

. <- S bne V£.d£ H99wd9d) fosdosqxs

SjIi9 do noxdBlnqoq Ixisrian arid

l

: 3 nq arid no dosdds yns bsrl 9pb Isni9d'Bq

.9HS93xb OBib'XBO

' nwoQ ridiw ydsd b pnxonb

, IS smoc o/nondo 24 1 raises the posibility of a "failure to copy genes correctly," as the male germ line undergoes a much larger number of cell divisions than the female and this suggests during spermatogonial division»

Campbell (1965) pointed out that although neither differ¬ ence alone was significant, his calculated excess of the mean paternal age over the maternal age in Lamy's study, 2.90 years against 1.94 years in controls, was significant.

In Campbell's study, there was an increase of the mean paternal age over mean maternal age in each of the separate groups of heart disease (average 3.27 years) as against the general population (2.74 years). It was least and probably not significant for coarctation of the aorta (6%). But it was at least 17% in all other groups: patent ductus arteriosus (17%) , atrial septal defect (17%) , tetralogy of

Fallot (21%), ventricular septal defect (25%), and pulmonary valvular stenosis (27%) . Campbell concludes that these differences in the difference of the mean paternal and 2 maternal ages are "therefore suggestive of a genetic factor" in congenital heart disease.

1 Penrose, L.S., "Parental Age and Mutation," Lancet, 2, (1955), p. 312.

2 Campbell, Maurice, "Causes of Malformation of the Heart," British Medical Journal, !5 (1965) , p. 899 . *

e vs I sms-ism 9ri:t isvo sps Isnisisq

io'i Jrtsoi^ inpie ion

■ 25

6. Birth rank

MacMahon (1952) , Campbell (1965) , and Ehlers et.al.

(1966) found that birth order alone has no influence on predisposition to congenital heart disease, but two other studies suggested that increased parity is of some importance in older women. Richards et.al. (1955) found a greater risk of having a child with congenital heart lesions in the third pregnancy as opposed to the first, especially in women over thirty. Lamy et.al. (1957) showed that if maternal age was held constant, birth rank was siginficantly higher for children with congenital heart anomalies in the maternal age groups 25-29 and 30-34.

In patent ductus arteriosus specifically MacMahon (1952) did show that this lesion was much more common in first than later births (51.4% of all patients with patent ductus arteriosus were first born compared to 36.6% firstborn of control series of 1,015 obtained by taking every two- hundredth name from the birth registrars; a significant different of 15.8 + 7.6 standard error).

7. Season of birth

MacMahon (1952) in Birmingham and Ehlers et.al. (1966) in this country did not find any relation between congenital heart disease and season of birth. However, season of birth was a factor of definite importance in congenital cardiac malformations during rubella epidemics (Higgins, 1965) . . 26

Otherwise, it does not seem to play a role except in patent ductus arteriosus.

In England, two studies have shown a consistently

increased seasonal incidence for patent ductus arteriosus

for girls (not for boys; they are distributed more equally).

Record and McKeown (1953) in Birmingham found the increased rnage from May to December, with a peak in July and August, while Campbell (1965) found the range from May to November with an August peak.

8. Chromosome studies

Chromosomes studies in patients with congenital heart disease have generally shown normal karotypes, although two studies have shown minor variants.

Makino (Grumbach et.al., 1963) studied twenty-two patients with congenital heart disease. Ten of the twenty- two had a partial deletion of No. 16 chromosome so that it was heterologous (four with atrial septal defect, two with both atrial and ventricular septal defect, and four with congenital heart disease of unknown type).

German et.al. (1966) studied chromosomes in thirty-

five index patients with congenital cardiac malformation,

twenty-nine of their relatives who also had congenital heart

anomalies, and twenty-one other relatives without congenital

cardiac defect. In four of the thirty-five index cases he found a small chromosomal variant. In each case, this as XW'IQfljO

.auBoi-isd-iB sudoub

. desq dsi/pixA ns dixw

ii.m nworfa evert ssxbu:

■ d Isdinspnoo ddxw 2iri9ijsq

uopoloxsden ebw

xisrid :ic sniia-Ydn9Wd

iswJ bne * asxlemone 27 variant was familial, occurring both in relatives affected and unaffected with congenital heart disease, so that variants were found in a total of eleven of eighty-five karotypes examined. These variants included enlarged short arm of member of group 13-15 in two families, heteromorphic

No. 16 in one family, and satellites on No. 17 in one family.

German stated that these variants are known to exist in apparently normal populations.

9. Summary

I would have to agree with Lamy that "both genetic and non-genetic factors play a part in the etiology of congenital heart disease. The relative importance of genetic and non- genetic factors appears to vary substantially from one 3 clinical subgroup to another."

The finding that a patient with one heart anomaly is much more likely to have a second cardiac malformation and that there is an increased risk of having a sib with congenital heart defect born after the propositus suggests that genetic factors may be implicated in congenital heart disease.

Consanguinity is important in situs inversus and dextrocardia, both of which are thought to be inherited as autosomal recessives.

3 Lamy, Maurice, de Grouchy, Jean, and Schweisguth, Odile. "Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors in the Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease: A study of 1188 cases." American Journal of Human Genetics, 9,(1957), p. 39. onixxi/ooo sew qnBxtiBV

led'od' s nx bnuoi 9i9W ednsx^BV

assriT .benifiisxs asqyloi&A

Si-El qcroxp r o isdnism io jtixb

no sod-illsiBa bnb , v1x,tis3: ono nx 91 .oW

.o' .6 [nqoq Ib. xton vli-nsiBqqB

YiBffTfnr/2 . 6

9VBri blxrow I

43 nx iisq £ ^6ro. xToJoei o t$&nop-non

-

or*B o3 qnoxpdi/g IboxxixIo

;I s r I oiorn rioxrm

j >oi fix :'d ’em siodoBit 28

However, concordance for omonzygotic twins is low when all types of congenital heart disease are taken together, whereas it should be 100% in a strictly genetic disease. Chromosome studies of patients with congenital heart malformation usually reveal normal karyotypes. Increased maternal age does not seem to be important except in predisposition to maternal non-disjunction and producing a child with Down's syndrome.

Possibly the excess of the mean paternal age over the mean maternal age shown in two studies is significant, but it is difficult to assess just what the operant genetic factor might be (Lamy et.al.

1957; Campbell, 1965).

Environment was certainly of definite importance during rubella epidemics. It seems possible that the importance of first births in patent ductus arteriosus might be because first labors are more prolonged, with greater anoxia, and thus the stimulus for closing of the ductus is not as great.

The term congenital heart disease covers a wide range of complex conditions. The relative importance of genetic and environmental factors varies widely depending on the particular condition, and the causation is probably multi¬ factorial . s&xbu:* 3 owb ni. nworis spB

. (gaei ,ii9dqm£0 -Aeex IV. Upper-extremity malformations

A. Incidence

Estimates of the frequency of upper-extremity malfor¬ mations are most difficult to obtain because the published reports do not usually state whether the various types of dactylism are noted in the hands or feet. Bunnell (1964) reported that the incidence of hand deformities varies from

0.15 to 5.4/1000 livebirths. The following tables from four different studies done in the United States States illustrate the variance in reported frequency.

29 8 cO/.erl erii' ri bsrJrin Sub mesIy^oBb

sSE^.-fsuIIi co CO CO co p p p p P P p p p p p p (D P 0) P a) p 0 p Pi "H p -p Pi -P P P P p Cl P p CD CD o CD 0) ID CD 0) LD CD d) O > LO a > 01 O > m 0 > £ -H O LD 00 00 cni £ P 1—1 C -rH CO CO 00 CN (N 1—1 £ -P rp CN i—I i—I CN i—1 i—I Q) i—I P r^ cm P a) •—1 CN CL) 1—1 (D P • • • * d • o • • d • • d LD CN 1—IOO - d O O O o o o o •H O o o o o • •p 0 1—1 1—1 •p 0 • ■p 0 O O 1—1 0 0 rd 0 0 1-1 0 0 £ O rd £ 0 • £ 0 rd £ 0 H P • 1—1 1—1 P H rP 0 H P -P d) P ■xf1 CD a) LD co CD cr> P £ O p p O rd CO p co 1—1 0 ■p £ l—1 p p 0) rd £ I—I o o o o > H I—I CD v—' co co O 0) -P •H -p p p s 1—1 (D -p CO p p rd CO '— rd P Q) g CO Q) -p P d) ■P P P £ fn P 1—1 P P i—I 1—1 1—1 1—I rd rd rd to rd co rd *H CN CO O 1—1 O g d) m -P P p p p p Qj 1—1 rd -P rd P 0 rd CO P rd £ rd rp O O O £ rd P £ p s 0 CD 0 a> 0 d Q) Q Q) Q CD £ S s S rd CD 1-1 tn g £ £ P g P CO d £ -P P rd p p LD P O 1-1 1-1 O 1-1 P d) P MH rci cn oo g 0 O 0) CO rP rP !—1 1—1 £ £ CN rp 3 a CN > £ rd ro co h £ 0) •rH P S CO (X P (D •P i—I rd '—1 U g rd d) O P P £ O g CM CM rd Eh £ p CD rd (1) £ MH O *H •8 d p 1—1 £ d rp •p O rd CD 0 d CO d d d P 0 1-1 £ £ X rd £ g CO CO £ >1 rd rd £ 0 CO P CD rji P P rd p P •H d) 0 rd O P 1—1 0 P 1—1 tn P -p rd P CD rd •ro -H >1 £ d d P tnp rd 3= p g •P P __ £ £ tn £ P d g CO a co Mh 0 fuv £ >1 -H •H £ P CL) rd -P d) co p ip CD rd P 0 P d rP Mh P -P co 1—I p P P P >1 >1 p oj P P P CO p d g d •H P -P 1—1 -P -rH -H P CO CD p d £ £ P £ P g 0 0 g O'1 •H t£LD p P P rd MH -P CD a £ rH -H & o3 £ g 0) P P CD CO >1 £ P g >1 d >1 0 d >r rd p tn 1—1 p i—I >tP CO 1—1 - £ 1—1 >1 p 1-1 1 >|CN 1—1 p MH £ P P £ rd ** i—1 X *H rd g >1 rd rH >1 CD P g rd 1—1 >0 rd tn 0 MH MH rd rd g (/} |>i (L) •—I g CO CO g >iH d O to g 1 >1 CO 1—1 P -H mh CD CD -H MH o d p >i 0 -H O P >i -P O P CD >1 a. p tn 1—I 1-1 1—! £ a £ o trip £ 1—1 £ OP £ >ir-! £ O 0 P £ d CD ■H < rd rd £ O < ■ >1 < rd u oh >1 C rd p O p p P £ P rd g P d P rd p d rd -p rd 0 d rd £ £ £ CN £ •rH 0 11 o >1 co d 0 >id X g tn 1 >1 d CD CD 0 CD 1—1 P £ rP CO C rd rH £ d) 0 P 1—1 £ CO CO P CO a> O ,—„ i—1 O -H t>i d 0 >iH £ rd 0 >1 •rH U £ s co C £| CO IP < O P CO S 3 3 1 S —

30 cw

u>

• o o o o O h-

t-t

< €* o o t_ H- -r- ' - cv

0) tn

O O O (-■

CU H- L M <4- < a. h-

•f 03 PO I/O tQ 6 H CU 31 B. Genetic

1. Racial differences

Several studies have confirmed that polydactylism is definitely more common in Negroes and that this color difference does not hold for eetrodactylism or syndactylism.

CONDITION ETHNIC GROUP: Incidence/1000 livebirths Study White Negro Japanese Mulatto

Ectrodactylia 0.09 Book (1951) 0.06 0.03 Shapiro (1958) 0.03 Neel (1958) 0.13 0.61 0.26 Saldanha (1963)

Syndactylia 0.17 0.06 Shapiro (1958)

Polydactylia 0.68 Book (1951) 0.58 4.00 Wallace (1953) 0.5 Harris (1954) 0.30 2.58 Shapiro (1958) 0.89 Neel (1958) 2.45 7.00 5.26 Saldanha (1963)

2. Parental age

Penrose (1960) has shown that in achrondroplasia, acrocephalosyndactyly, and arachnodactyly the average parental age is great; this effect resulted entirely from older paternal age, with maternal age not of importance.

3. Mode of transmission

Bell has shown that in certain families both brachy- ' 32 dactyly (1951) and syndactyly (1953) are transmitted as autosomal dominants in that the defects manifest in the heterozygote. . 9^0PYso:j:9:' V. Association of hand and heart malformations

A. Incidence

There is general agreement that patients with congenital heart disease have a much increased chance of having a second malformation, which may be of almost any type. Lamy et.al.

(1957) and Campbell (1965) in clinical series found that

12% of children with congenital heart disease had a second malformation (a five-fold increase over chance expectation) .

Higgins (1965) cites six studies done from 1898 to 1955 which obtained incidences of from 11% to 36% of associated malformations of other systems in individuals with cardio¬ vascular malformations, the higher incidences generally being in autopsy populations.

MacMahon et.al. (1953) found that 5.1% of children with congenital heart disease had an associated skeletal malfor¬ mation .

Wiland (1956) found that 9.5% of the necropsy cases with congenital heart malformation had an associated musculoskeletal anomaly. Although the musculoskeletal anomalies were extremely variable, the most common malformations were of the fingers (polydactyly, absence of digits, and contractures of one or more fingers), occurring in 4% of all children with congenital heart malformations. Further¬ more, defects in the interatrial and interventricular septa were associated with the highest incidence of extracardiac anomalies, while abnormalities in the development of the

33 Dili be

. noxd-6/n

I jb 3 o I s Aa oLu o aifm

'lad-OBid-noo 34

aortico-pulmonary septum had the lowest incidence of

associated malformations (no extracardiac anomalies in trans position of the great vessels and very low incidence in

persistent ).

Lamy et.al. (1957) found that 4.25% of children with

congenital heart disease had associated multiple mal¬

formations of the hands and upper extremities and 1.42% had syndactyly of hands or feet.

Wood (1958) very briefly noted that in a consecutive

series of 1250 cases of congenital heart disease (in which

there was no statement that extremity deformities were

ascertained) that it was found that seven of eight patients with limb deformities had ventricular septal defect, three of three with polydactyly had tetralogy of Fallot, and that

arachnodactyly was far more often associated with atrial

septal defect than with any other anomaly (arachnodactyly occurred in 15% of simple atrial septal defect and in 12% of atrial septal defect with pulmonic stenosis and reversed

shunt).

Boesen (1963) found a bone and joint malformation pre¬

valence in 16% of his clinical series and in 17% of his

autopsy series of patients with congenital cardiac anomalies

He confirmed Wiland's finding that it was very unusual to

get extracardiac malformations in patients with complete

tranposition of the great vessels. In both clinical and

necropsy groups, atrial septal defects were more often ■ ■ 9rid- io at •iaoq 35 combined with harelip and cleft palate while in ventricular septal defects bone and joint malformations were the most common.

Stevenson et.al. (1950) made a most interesting observation regarding the association of hand and heart anomalies. He used as a basis Arey's table (1946) which showed the development of the various organs according to the embryo's age and then attempted to determine the gestational month in which each defect presumably appeared. The congenitally malformed infants were then reclassified by the system affected and tabulated against the month in which the embryological origin of the defect was presumed to be.

System Affected Month During Gestation When Defect Developed

1 2 3 4

Central nervous 59 32 27 0

Musculoskeletal 0 92 9 0

Cardiovascular 4 55 0 0

Genitourinary 0 2 1 27

( Stevenson et.al. 1950)

Central nervous system defects had their origin through¬ out all of the first trimester, while cardiovascular and musculoskeletal anomalies were remarkably concentrated during the second month of gestation. . naoxmoo

_acG b abs/n (OcGI) .Lb.Jb no£fl6V9^2

qolsvsb srii. bsworfs

aJ-rtBiai bsnrxoirlsni vllis^xnapnoo 36

B. Thalidomide lesions

Associated lesions might result from a teratogen acting

on the developing hands and heart of the foetus. Both the

limb buds and the primitive tube-heart appear in the embryo

during the fourth week of foetal life. The differentiating

upper limbs and heart and great vessels then complete the major portion of their maturation during the fourth to sixth weeks (Arey, 1965). These could be simultaneously affected by an abnormal factor in their environment acting adversely

on their normal evolution.

Support for this suggestion comes from the European and

Australian outbreak of phocomelia caused by the drug thalid¬ omide. If thalidomide was ingested by the pregnant mother

from the 34th to 50th day after her last menstrual period,

there was greater than a 50% risk of having an affected

child (Lenz, 1966). Lenz has delineated the specific time of action. (See Table on page 37).

Other anomalies noted included saddle nose; midline

facial capillary hemangioma, most commonly on upper lip,

nose, and frontal area; gastrointestinal tract: atresia of

esophagus, pyloric and duodenal stenosis, malrotation,

agenesis of appendix and cecum and ;

urinary tract: hypoplasia and agenesis of urinary tract and

and also horseshoe kidney; genital tract: bicornuate

uterus, atresia or absence of vagina, and rectovaginal fistula. ,U .»I388- b«s bne adnul U9«jqo

al lOlDBt UMtOMdB n£ <£d

.nciiuLovs Isnn:on ixarli no

Oixolyq xBXJ^6flq039 37

Day of Ingestion Part Affected

34 — 38 Anotia or gross abnormalities of ears. Paralysis of cranial nerves III, IV, VI, and VII. Sometimes also duplication of thumbs.

39—44 Amelia or almost complete absence of arms.

42 No phocomelia or absence of legs.

44—48 Aplasia of femora or tibiae

45 Complete or almost complete absence of legs not observed.

About 50 Triphalangism of thumbs Sometimes stenosis of rectum

40 — 45 Aplasia of gallbladder Atresia of duodenum Most cardiac anomalies (although some congenital heart disease a few days earlier)

(Lenz , 1963)

Intelligence was thought to be normal. (Mellin, 1962; Lenz

1962, 1963, 1966; Martin, 1964).

It is not known exactly how many foetuses were at risk from maternal thalidomide ingestion or how many foetuses were born deformed. In Australia, McBride (1961) found forty mothers who took thalidomide. Of these, twenty-three had normal babies, but only three of the twenty-three took the drug within the critical time of 35-50 days after the last menstrual period. The remaining seventeen had abnormal babies, with fourteen of these babies exhibiting the typical anomalies • 2£-

[ 37

and ten of these malformed infants not surviving.

Lenz (1963) stated that there were in England and Wales

260 living cases of typically malformed infants whose mothers had ingested thalidomide, 85 deceased, and 42 suspected, in

Scotland 56 cases, and in the Netherlands 25 cases.

Spiers (1963) has suggested that the British and Scottish

figures probably represented about 50% of those affected.

Lenz (1963) found 78 cases in 17,409 births in thirteen obs¬

tetric departments in Western Germany. He noted an abrupt

decline in the incidence of phocomelia eight months after

the withdrawal from the market of thalidomide; only two cases

occurred after this time and both mothers had taken thalidomide.

The West German Health Ministry has just reported that thali¬

domide was responsible for deformities in 2,625 children.^

Of children malformed due to maternal thalidomide inges¬

tion, the arms were abnormal in about 80%, affecting preferentially

the thumbs and radii, and in almost 20% the ears were absent

or severely hypoplastic. In about 65% to 75% only the arms were affected, in nearly 10% to 25% both arms and legs, and

in approximately 2% to 5% only legs. When legs were affected,

the tibia was most often missing (Mellin, 1962; Lenz, 1963,

1966) .

Congenital heart disease seems to be a lesion frequently

associated with the abnormal arms. When Taussig investigated

the German outbreak of phocomelia in 1962, she stated that in

4 A.M.A. News, February 12, 1968, page 2. SDrfzf lo nsj- bn&

bx/Tiobilfirlj bsdsspni bfifi

3iq9^ Y-idedo^q 39:rupii

I n.6flrcs0 ^ssW 9riT 38

Lenz's series of 203, the malformation most commonly associated with anomalous upper extremities (other than abnormal ears), was congenital heart malformations (17/203 = 8.4%) . The anomalies included hypoplasia of the aorta, defects of auricular and ventricular septum, all forms of transposition of the great vessels, tetralogy of Fallot, and pulmonary stenosis. In a necropsy series of fourteen cases with mat¬ ernal thalidomide ingestion, five had tetralogy of Fallot and four had ventricular septal defect (9/14 =64.3%)

(Pliess, 1962) . Of forty-nine cases in an appendix to a discussion by Lenz on thalidomide, seven had a congenital heart defect (7/49 = 14.3%). One child suspected of congenital heart disease died on the second day of life, one had a patent ductus arteriosus, two had ventricular septal defect and truncus arteriosus communis, and one had undiagnosed congenital heart defect, possibly atrial septal defect of secundum type (Lenz, 1963).

The thalidomide saga, then, is an example of an ingested drug which was harmless to the mother, but in the environment of the foetus was a teratogen acting at a series of specific embryologic stages to produce characteristic patterns of malformation which included both the hands and heart. nolBfiione ri^iw

2fc\Y) ^oslsb jiaeri SPECIFIC AIMS OF THIS INVESTIGATION

As rapid strides are being made in cardiovascular

surgery, many patients who would formerly have died as

infants are now surviving to adulthood and bearing children.

Thus it becomes even more important to define the mode of inheritance of various types of cardiac anomalies so that rational can be given.

Prior to June, 1965, when this study was started, seven instances of the familial transmission of congenital heart lesions in association with upper-extremity malformations, especially of the digits (Holt-Oram syndrome), had been reported. In these cases, there was wide variation in the types of upper-extremity and cardiovascular anomalies observed, even within the same pedigree.

The Holt-Oram syndrome has been delineated now as one in which upper limb anomalies, affecting primarily the radial segment, and congenital heart lesions, most often atrial and ventricular septal defects, sometimes associated with bizarre arrhythmias, are inherited together as an

autosomal dominant trait.

Several other clinical syndromes are known in which

congenital heart disease is associated with an upper extremity malformation. These entities include D-^ trisomy of

chromosomes 13-15 (polydactyly, ventricular septal defect,

and dextroversion or dextrocardia, with atrial septal defect

in 1/3); E-^ trisomy of chromosomes 16-18 (archnodactyly,

39 n sif> sJns nl

oi.iD io 39qY3 gut)iiRv io SDneJl’ierinl

c'itoco oiJ"9nep • Xfinoid-fid:

adi pj.b srld lo vIlBioeqES

.&9^^oqS3

.& id aj --leqqu 'to asqy^

5 a srid riiridiw neve

..jisod dnsnimob Ismoaodufi

£ 1 a 9friQ a omoirio 40 flexion contracture of fingers, ventricular septal defect, and large patent ductus arteriosus); Down's trisomy of chromosome 21 (short, stubby hands with brachymesophalangia of fifth fingers, endocardial cushion defect with atrial septal defect, secundum type, and ventricular septal defect, either alone or in combination with other lesions); Turner's

(short metacarpals, cubitus vulgus, XO/XO type coarctation of aorta, XO/XX type pulmonic stenosis with atrial septal defect); Marfan's (arachnodactyly, aortia media changes leading to diffuse or dissecting aneurysm, aortic incompe¬ tence, inherited as autosomal dominant); Fanconi's panmyelopathy (aplasia of radius and thumbs with heart malformations, inherited as autosomal recessive); Ellis and van Crevald syndrome (chondrodystrophic dwarfism, polydactyly, dystrophy of fingernails, single , inherited as autosomal recessive); Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome (poly¬ dactyly, syndactyly, congenital heart disease inherited as autosomal recessive). (Bell, 1958; Keith et al., 1958;

McKusick, 1964; Campbell, 1965; Holmes, 1965; and Rodhe,

1966) .

Each of these conditions represents a generalized defect which manifests itself in a varied pattern of malformation.

Although neither the upper-extremity abnormality nor the cardiovascular lesion is diagnostic of the syndrome, the associated defects are characteristic of it.

Just as the pediatrician is alerted to a probable :sM ; (J-osisb

: 41 abnormality of the genitourinary system when he notes low- set, malformed ears, so it would be useful if the physician examining the newborn was signaled by an external anomaly of the hand to follow the infant carefully for evidence of congenital heart disease which would not necessarily be manifest at birth. Careful periodic cardiovascular evaluation is particularly important in this era of rapidly advancing cardiac surgery, when the child with congenital heart mal¬

formation can often be markedly palliated, if not totally corrected, before irreversible pulmonary hypertension has set in.

One would first thus like to know if simple visual inspection of the hands might be a diagnostic aid in the detection of congenital heart lesions. Since cardiac malformations appear commonly with musculoskeletal anomalies

(in which system the most common malformations are those of the fingers), a survey was also undertaken to see further if a clear, constant association between a specific type of hand anomaly and a particular kind of congenital heart lesion could be demonstrated. ^Bnxiuoiin©p 9rfd io Ydxlsrrrxoncfe

<3i£9 bemxolIsRi , d©3

dxssfi zs inspnoo

ri9f{w , Y'1

riLiT o riBO noliBirnroi

siojed vbed-os-xioo

.ni; daa

5:;qq£ -:.roxjGirrxorLIsrj.

.rt.G \-j£; ons bxisri

b9d£idsno.in9b 9d blx/oo MATERIAL AND METHODS

Identification of Subjects: Because of the difficulty inherent in obtaining and examining a large sample size from a mobile population such as a clinic, it was decided to pur¬ sue these studies in a fixed population. Sonoma State

Hospital, about one hour's drive north of San Francisco, serves the entire Northern California area of thirty-one counties in housing those mentally retarded adults and children who require state-supported hospitalization.

Obviously, this is a very selected population with much inherent bias towards persons for which the fight for survival raises fundamental questions. Admission criteria include an I.Q. of less than 70, but in fact those children with higher I.Q. are sent to another state hospital with more specialized training programs. Thus, a recent article about

Sonoma State Hospital stated that in a current population of

3359, 2435 are profoundly or severely retarded and 2070 had an I.Q. of less than 30 (Hobbs, 1967) . Furthermore, admission to the hospital is partially based on the degree of social problem the child creates, e.g. attacking others, self¬ destructive, or incapable of ambulation or feeding or toilet training, and the ability of the home or community to cope with the situation. In addition, an obviously mentally re¬ tarded child with cardiac defects is rarely offered either palliative or corrective surgery. Thus those children with major anomalies associated with high early mortality often

42 10HT3M GViA JAIH3TAM

v a'xjjori 3fio Juode Alsd'jLqaoH

. Is3 msrii'xoW sii+ns srfJ asviss

s^-Liipsi ortw nsxbliilo

d’ns^srln.x

Xfid’iq . oH 33&5Z smonoS ^0 43

never reach Sonoma to be included in this population.

Thus, the bias inherent in the population was well

recognized, but this population was chosen as one relatively

fixed in time and space which could be examined as a pilot

study and from which any positive results derived could then

be reinvestigated in a normal population. As the association

of hand defects and cardiac anomalies in Down's syndrome is well known, these patients were excluded to avoid markedly

prejudicing the data. All other patients in the hospital,

regardless of cause of mental deficiency, and including all

ages (from birth to eighty years) were studied.

Selection of Subjects: Two sample groups were chosen from

the total patient population. The first group were those pat¬

ients who had hand anomalies and the second was a control

group of 10% random sample of patients without hand malfor¬

mations. Both these same groups were then subjected to a

specified evaluation of cardiac function.

Procedure for Making and Recording Observations ? During

summer, 1965, the entire hospital population of 3,439 patients

was surveyed for hand malformations by the writer.

A list of patients was prepared prior to visiting each

ward. The 392 patients with Down's syndrome were noted and

excluded on a priori grounds, reducing the population to be

surveyed to 3,047 patients with all types of mental deficiency

other than Down's syndrome.

Furthermore, those patients who had been previously i- qoc j iftijfiq arti

I IB 3 mobriBI #01 JO quOxQ rtf) 44 diagnosed and noted in the master file as having hand defects were noted. Thus patients who had had anomalies such as rudimentary sixth digits which had been repaired before entering Sonoma were included in the group with hand malformations.

Each ward population was then surveyed by the writer for upper-extremity deformities. The patient was asked to extend his fingers and display alternately both the backs and palms of his hands to the examiner. In uncooperative subjects, the examiner opened the hand, insofar as possible. Each ward was visited on at least two different days to insure that the maximum number of patients would be seen. Of the

3,047 patients, 2,985 were actually visually inspected for hand deformities. Sixty-two patients were out of the hospital during the period of the ward survey, usually because they were spending the summer with their family at home.

Specific anomalies which could be easily discerned were ectrodactyly, polydactyly, and syndactyly. The standing height of the individual was considered in deciding which hands exhibited brachydactyly or arachnodactyly. Unequal length was defined as third and fourth digits equal in length or a second digit longer than the third. Incurved fifth fingers are those whose terminal phalanx curved toward the fourth finger; short fifth digits are those which terminated at less than or halfway between the first two flexion creases ni bsbon >n£ £>9 - - - - P £ -i- -p

3 b _ o i b

. anoxb^rraoitlsm

srib'

o bsbisxv

. asj:Jirao596 bnsrl

tos u j. cnibriaqa sxsw V9rii, sauBoed

. ©mod

iismons oxlxosqS

;;a {•■. •:•. x \£LxJc>E>bvLoq , osboxbos

Isubxvxbdi odd lo .. dpxsd

■iorlv; ssorib exs axspnxi

bxoda •, xapnxit ddxbob

srid a xwb9d 10 rcedb aasl ds 45

of the fourth digit. Examples of these hand malformations

follow (Table 1) on the next pages.

It was originally planned to x-ray the hands of all patients in the study and then quantify these visual observations of abnormality and normality by phalangeal/metacarpal and skeletal age/chronological age ratios. But it quickly became apparent that these mentally retarded patients were unable to cooperate in straightening their hands so that any measurements would be inaccurate and meaningless. Radiograms of the hands of the 216 patients with anomalies were, however, taken to document the malformations. As explained below, an addit patient with polydactyly was added to this ; group later.

Patients were assigned to categories of hand anomali< in the following order:

Order Anomaly Number with Anomaly

1. Ectrodactyly or 4 4 Polydactyly 4 4 2. Syndactyly 9 7 3. unequal length 17 17 4. Arachnodactyly or 88 75 Brachydactyly 52 48 5. Short and/or incurved fifth finger (s) 43 37 217 192*

*These are the patients with hand anomalies on whom cardiac- evaluations were completed.

To select the control group without hand anomalies, a

list of the total hospital population excluding those patients with Down's syndrome who were resident on June 6, 1966, was prepared (3,011 patients). Using a table of random numbers spb rEoj:poIoncaffo\£3pfi

' nfij! :l r^il jJ-nsa asGitj dr.rLf drisiBqqB

lisnJ- pninsiiip/.BiJ a ni sJ-sssqooo

SS9lp:'HIE-JI7I bnz> eJSSJODSCll 9d bluOW

sdnsidisq dl£ 9ii.7 io

xsbiO

ridiw

1 r-0,£) b&7sq9iq Table I: Photographs and x-rays of hand anomalies observed in this study

The numbers are the patient numbers assigned to each subject. Complete information on each patient except for #0619, #0951, and #1171 can be found in Table III by comparing patient number.

46

77 Ki&h-/' /~€EE nan nf

‘j 4f l?<35

X- £> ^ i± \%%iT

SZ)

S>\j Yicdo. c4-\j ^ 4^= 2 I O I aT'+er ^per^-h'o r,

r\d a oty) y rf-ftir op&rddi'6n

S2,

** 2_

S3

A f <3. oh n o 3

Ara ch n a dac^\

33"

6rcioln i/ dac-htjl y ** £W7<9

R^^^ible !4ol-f- Ora m 5y ndf ^ r>-v <£L. ^ 1775

!\)p r m 3-1 le-4'+ le-Pf h’nn^ev' bt 4'rux'ioo b ha-nH hra rv d1 o u5 1 i V)e5 7 Kj i' -Ho. 5 ri 0 e v" 11 ke r ikj h k -Ha u/vn b S\A pc r i cn pa s«?c\

X— y

W i~Ho *=M7 7 S' ■Hi om lo

Shorr and & \ r\ c u r \/ e ci Un^e^s

5horiened and mcu wed 111 !

g\J 14-K on k/ duJO phS'l'snaes

60

a control group of 10% was then chosen. Of the 301 patients

thus identified, 18 were excluded because they had previously

been determined to have hand anomalies. Another 31 patients were new to the hospital since the preceding year and thus

had not been visually examined. However, on visual survey,

only one of these was found to have a hand anomaly (poly-

dactyly) and she was added to the group with hand anomalies.

As the admission policy remained consistent, it is likely

the 31 patients of the random sample new to the hospital over

the preceding year did not differ substantially from the pat¬

ients in residence in summer, 1965.

These two groups of subjects were then subject to a

cardiac evaluation done by the consultant cardiologist and

the writer. Workup included chart review and history, physical

examination with primary emphasis on cardiovascular system,

electrocardiogram, and posterior-anterior and left lateral

chest x-rays. If congenital heart disease was suspected

from these studies, x-rays of barium swallow with posterior-

anterior, left lateral, and right and left oblique views were

done and the patient was reexamined. When it was possible,

cardiac catheterization was done to substantiate the diagnosis.

Information which had been obtained at cardiac surgery was

also used in establishing the diagnosis.

It was possible to complete the cardiac evaluations or

obtain an autopsy report on 192 of 217 (88%) patients with

hand anomalies and on 267 of 282 (95%) patients without hand

9'9W 81 xbsxlxOnsbi aurli

90x1x2 lebxqeofl 9iii ob wsn si9w

.£>s»nxjTi6X9 vJLIgusIv need don bsrl

f. i xsri g e cri ob bnnol ssw 939.d^ 3:o 9no ylno

be sbw sria bns (Ylyxtoeb

anas b9n±G:riui qoxloq noiesinibe 9rii sA

on bib obsy pnxbsosiq 9/ti

.5oil ,iBoimua nx 9onsbxa9o; nx sinsx

ID'.- sJ-osrc.ra ic sqiro'xp o'/i 939rfT

£> o bebxrlonx xt;{"xc. . asii'iw srii

L.i"riqm9 vneminq ribiw noxoBnxmBxs

ix9b300 bat. x rnBipoxbxBOOxJ-oslB

.syex-x ztssrfo

zi- x ^ssxbLrie 939x1^ moii

noibesxn

29xXb-Tions bnerl 61

anomalies. The remainder of patients either were transferred

to another institution before these studies could be completed

or died without necropsy being performed. Thus this study is

composed of information obtained on the hand and heart mal¬

formations of 459 of a possible 499 patients. Table II

shows demographic information about the 459 patients in the

study.

Table II

Characteristic Hand anomaly Normal hand patients patients N = 19 2 N = 267 Sex: Races Males 103 = 53.6% 150 = 56.2% together Females 89 = 46.4% 117 = 43.8%

Race : White 150 = 78.1% 147 = 92.5% Sexes Negro 30 = 15.6% 15 = 5.6% together Other races 12 = 6.3% 5 = 1.9%

Diagnosis: Diagnosis of mental re¬ tardation, 100 = 52.1% 123 = 47.9% with congenital cerebral defect of unknown cause

The percentage of males and females in the two groups

appears to be approximately the same.

There is an obvious increase in the percentage of

Negroes with hand anomalies as compared to a random sample of the population without hand malformations. One might

expect that a large number of Negroes with polydactyly would

explain this as polydactyly is known to be much more common

in Negroes. However, of four patients with polydactyly, only

one was a Negro. Thus, there seems to be no readily apparent .aexlemons

=>9M oiolsd nox:tolx>ix?nx t9ri^one od

l pruisl , - r. ^asn i-uoriiw bsxb

isddo noxifSiTOoifii bsaoqmoo

Idiaaoq i- lo eel io snoxdB/rriol

Inc 16 r o±i . l iioli i oirfqexponsb awoda

.ybnda

...

: xs8 aso&H isridspod

: sobH oxpsM asxsS xsridspod

axaonpBxd -31 Ifidnem , rtoil&bi&l

-d od axfisqqfi

i anoxvdo nfi ex 9isriT

1.6 ions bnsd ddxw B90xpsW

■ run. ■ isl 6 dsrid io9qx9

aidd nxElqxs 62

explanation for the increased numbers of Negroes with hand

anomalies found in this population.

A striking fact was the lack of knowledge of the cause

of mental retardation in the vast majority of these patients.

More than half of the patients at Sonoma State Hospital are

classified under a single "wastebasket" category,"mental

retardation due to congenital cerebral defect of unknown

cause. noiien'Iqxs

i'ti ni ibra/ob gexlsmons

erfd bb '

srlrt ni noibsbtiBJ-s^ Isdnam

,io " io .gjbdsdssw” aipni * s isbnxr beiilggslo

:eo Isdxnse tor ext sub rcoiisbxsis'i

. 92JJEO RESULTS

The prevalence of hand anomalies detected on visual survey of the population of mentally retarded (excluding

Down's syndrome patients) resident at Sonoma State Hospital during summer, 1965, was 7.3% (216/2985). In a 10% random sample of the population (excluding Down's syndrome patients) resident at Sonoma State Hospital on June 6, 1966, the pre¬ valence of hand abnormalities was 6.3% (19/301).

The prevalence of congenital heart malformations esti¬ mated from a 10% random sample of the population (excluding

Down's syndrome patients) resident at Sonoma State Hospital on June 6, 1966, was 3.2% (9/285).

Table III on the following page details specific infor¬ mation on the patients found to have congenital cardiac defects and the hand anomalies with which these were associated.

63 he bnBrl 3:6 BoriBlBVBiq esiT

X1 Ed n sn 3o noid-filuqoq srii 3:o ysvixra

i-n9biE3i (abnexiBq sno^bnye a'nwoCI

?£.Y 3bw ,£361 , iBJnmna r>aiiijb v< a pxixboloxe) noxiBljxqoq srli lo ©IqniBS

oH sbsb , 6mono2 bfi J-nablasT

. So - XV.’ iBrj r.lB.'TrxondB bnsri 3to sonolBv

bsxI I xxnspnoo 3to sonelsvsxq sriT

. mobriBX #01 s mox3: bsiB/n

• xe^ f (azJ-nexiEq BjnoxbnYa a'nwoG

2) ?S.C 3Bw , £ 501 , d bhjxL no

:

..Is/ ohb bnBri Qjrfb bns ai’osisb

::- ' • 8 p g a CM P 0 LD CO o in o i—i in H CO H1 *H *H O CM i—I t—i i—i CM CO 0 •H £ p rH CO o i—1 0 >1 0 0 g P p! P tn p g g 0 rd *H p p •H Cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 is p Q CD 0 iH LD CO o CO in o O 0 p 0 c- 0 00 rH 0 p i—1 rd g LD P in g cd g p g *0 g in 0 0 *H g rd -P 0 G\ 0 CC 0 cn g m 0 -H P 0 rH o rH U rH O P O i—I 0 rH o i—i p •H ch g 0 P 0 0 g g g g g g p > rd O P £ > £ 0 05 g a o o 0 0 o 0 B p 0 0 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 0) rd P p p p p p p p p P p P p P 0 o P •H i—i •p g ■p g •H £ ■h g ■H g ■H g tr. P 0 0 P 0 p g p g X 3 p g P g P g 0 ft ft IS P s S pP S s S CO »--- ft o ft S t s s s s

CM

p H g 0 H 0 g i—1 1-1 •H •H OCM 0 CO 0 •H W P g 1—1 > r^l-1 P & 0 rH P P 0 ffl 0 p P o i—i g g g < CO p o 0 w 0 0 0 E-t 0 0 p i—! i—1 ■H > o p Pr p 0 0 p > •H 0 t>1 0 05 0 o 0 p P 1—i p 05 0 p i—1 p 0 g g 0 0 o pip - o >1 i—1 o > p -H P rH rH *H p 0 *H o g P 0 0 0 p 0 P p P ■rH 0 •H •H p g a CO 0 P P 0 0 0 g 0 0 g 0 P p 0 g 0 0 0 B CO o P 0 p p g g > i—1 tr> 0 0 p o 0 0 g p i—i •H 3 g p p a 0 0 p p P i—i 05 0 0 0 g 1—1 •H 0 0 g *H 0 • g 05 P o p u o o CO CO o P >i >1 g •ri g •H •H 0 o i—i p •H 0 l—1 1—1 0 P 0 g g •H g 0 o P O rd rd p P p 0 0 05 *P 0 P O B B p 0 0 B B p 0 P p g 05 0 C 0 > p, i—1 «—1 0 •H P 0 0 g g g p •H g g U Q < 05 > w <

P g p o 0 (T\ CO LD m r- CM i—i ■H P CO CM CO i—i 00 co 00 i—i p B CO CO i—i o in CO o CO 0 g cm CM o o CM i—i 1—1 1—1 p is

>1 r—1 0 05 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 g g g g g g g g 0 q 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 o P dactyly M.R. of unknown causer ?Cornelia deLange s s s s s s s s Ectro” 2065 Right aberrant subclavian artery Male White 1959 25

64 s-

-'—D,

CO ra H- CD m kJ

u a cp ia cd h!

U IP K* 1—i H'

!—i Ol • 0) >a -7

3 --J CV3

H o H H* t—• ' H- CD .—, S <4- if '-Q

r4> (D :< 31 5, hi

01 U

CU

H+»

H*

3 CP

(D CD U. Q U Hand Patient Cardiac Sex_Race_Birth_ Anomaly Number Diagnosis Mental Retardation Diagnosis •h i—1 ro 1-1 r—i ■g •H I—1 i—I g ng i—1 g ID g i— -p CO ID g co g Q-r o i—1 eg g 0 0 g g O 0 g g o B 0 (D -P gn 0 > g CD > CD g g o g • «*. g 0) B fd 0) g CD CO 0 0 egg 1 ! 1 •H •H rH 4-C •—i 1— X -P r-~ 00 £ P U vP* P co 0 B O >i g 0 eg eg ! ! • • • *H •p g •H CN o g g g i—i i—i H g 1— CO ID m g g g £ [2 LD o g g o -p cn gtf Q B g 0 g X H g o o g g B o g o Pi i—1 0 g g 0 0 g i g P 0 B CD eg eg • «~ • • *H •p •H i—1 g i—i '=d1 CO m in o CO in ID ti > o g g g Ip ■P CO g o o B 0 CL) 0 g CO CO 0 g co g o, 0 g g > 0 g g CD rtf 0 g £ g S£H ! - i—1 gj X +J eg < g O g. (D g CO to g e 0 eg g 0 g £ • • i—1 ■H g •p ■H rH CO CO CO i—1 o o i—1 LD CO 00 g & -P g g CO X u B g CD rtf 0 CD g CD p g 0 X g 0 g eg g g 0 i g - t i—1 -p £ eg < CO to g; CD g g g 0 B CD eg eg •• * • 65 g •H g i—! CO •p i—1 i—1 3- CM o i—1 1—1 CO CO CM X +J fe g Q CD B rtf CD 0) 0 g 0 X g 0 u g g g g 0 U g g AC i—1 ip £ eg O g O £ g O to CD g g rtf P • • H co *H •H g 1—1 CO i—! CO CO o 1—1 t g 00 CO id £ -P eg g g g Ph g CD B rtf CD CD 0 0 CO g 0 g o g 0 g g 0 g P * p g 0 g 0 g S !El g 0-1 X rH nC LO CM ms o O i—i r-' IS g -P 0-! T) g g > g g < CD rtf CD H 0 g -p g Ur 0 g g 0 0 g g 0 g g 0 g 0 (d *h 0 g g g g e *-P c i—1 CM CO •rH ■H rtf Ph *p r—i g -P ■H 0 g i—1 -p m) i—i u -P -P g •' * rtf g CD g rtf CD -P g o 4-t CD g o rtf -P o g g, £ o 0 O g to g g 0 eg £ i—1 ■ P •H rd I—1 CO LD CO H o •p i—1 •p X -p CM CM CM g LO g g C < g g B rtf CD B CD CD 0 g g 0 o 0 0 g 0 0 p g 0 g o 0 g 0 0 0 g 0 0 g Dj ■h ■—i g i—l -p -P t i—l £ eg -p g rtf 0 g, 0 CO g rtf o CD g CD g rtf rtf g o X rtf g CD g 0 £ £ e • i—1 CM •H H CO CO CO i— •H •H H £ i—1 & g g CM CO [■"- £ g < g - CD rtf CD p g 0 g 0 o g 0 g 0 B 0 0 g 0 0 0 a - g5 cp 1—1 <-< tc-r eg g B CO CO g 0 CD rtf g rtf g £ g g 0 £ £ •*- • • i—1 ■^r •p •H H CO LO o CO t—1 g O ID rH CO £ < < g g g B g 0 p g g CD CD CD t 0 0 0 g 0 g 0 0 B a 0 0 g 0 0 g - X cp X 1—1 *=H Pi £ g CO 0 B rtf g rtf g to £ g g CD g 0 £ £ • •

continued H

tn H' a O' 1-1 V H-

to

to

a •

to c 0 Tj

0 1-1 £ 0 -H a LO CO O 0 o r" 0 O g CM 00 t—l H CM o i—1 P i—i On! -H i—l c LO CM 0 0 p £ £ 0 £ £ 0 03 £ 0 ■H P 0 > £ O g 0 0 -H •H P O 0 0 0 P £ 0 P- £ £ 0 P o Pm r—1 rd P to 0 0 0 0 0 •' £ 4-1 0 CD 0 OJ 0 LO *- P CM 0 o- 03 o Pi O' -H CO 0 >i 0 u ■H h 0 LO 0 CO >1 £ LO 0 CO CD £ CO H H 0 0 0 •r~l Q CO 0 CO P CO p •£ CO £ CO i—1 CO 0 CO -H CO £ CQ 1—1 •H i—1 0 i—1 p i—1 0 H 0 r-H P rH g 1—I 0 0 £ 03 o 0 i—1 o P 0 O to 0 & 0 £ 0 P £ ■r-l 0 £ 0 £ £ 0 03 I £ 0 P - 3 P P 3 g i—1 3 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 £ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 p *H P £ P P £ P £ P C p -H P £ p £ O £ G •H p •h a, 0 •H P •H £ ■H i—1 -H £ -H P 0 0 P tJ1 P £ P 0 o P £ P -H P 0 P P P £ P P 3: U & £ Is o IS £ IS > 12 £ IS H c? £ 0 O £ £ £ £ P P 0 P 0 0 a P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 H # V. H rH 1—1 i—l •- 1-1 •N 0 0 • 0 • 0 • rd • 0 • rd — 0 * 0 • 0 X P i—i & g (X g P g os g P g • 1-1 P 1—1 P Pi 0 £ 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 p 0 ♦ 0 • 0 •SOH

i—\ 3 CM 0 0 *• O -H 1—1 Pi i—i CM •H 0 1—1 P £ P 0 rd 0M O 1—1 0 £ £ 0 H i—1 -H rH g g 0 if) £ 0 0 0 0 £ £ P to P P £ ■H -H P 0 § 0 Pm Pm. 0 P £ 0 3 -H 0 0 p £ P £ 0 -H T3 0 0 £ 0 0 -H £ £ 0 P, •' P 0 0 £ £ P-, P i—1 £ P O h 1—1 H 0 0 >1 • - 0 0 0 -p P 1—1 -H P 0 to 0 0 rO' O i—i 0 o £ £ i—1 -H 0 £ •H 0 0 0 U 0 >i 0 £ 0 p i—! 0 to > p p •H -£ £ > > p 0 £ 0 0 0 £ £ 0 O £ -H -H O 0 03 03 P P £ £ P 3 0 P £ £ £ 0 £ £ 0 c W £ 0 i—l i—1 0 CO 0 g 0 P 0 0 £ 0 g 0 0 > - !> i—t g 0 £ 0 0 to\ 0 P P CM £ 0 £ tO 0 P £ ra £ a Pm 03 - 03 P: £ 0 0 •H £ 0 0 0 0 £ -H £ 0 0 0 0 0 •H 44 0 0 0 ' 0 *- P p £ -H 0 £ o 0 0 0 0 0 np -H l-1 £ 0 0 -P t—i i—1 ■—1 P 1—1 p -M i—1 i—l £ O 0 •H £ £ 0 0 0 O 0 0 G rd 0 P 0 £ •H £ "a to 0 ■H •H •H 0 -rH 0 0 g g £ g p 0 u 0 P £ £ £ P £ P P 0 0 0 1—1 0 0 •H 0 P P P 0 P 0 0 £ £ 0 £ £ N P u Q P < <1 < 03 C 03 Pm 0 rtl P Pm O •H 0 £ rC3 p 0 £ 0 P 0 4-> £ 0 P £ £ 1—1 P 0 0 0 CM LO LO CO CO O O ■H’ rd P P P i—I LO ["- i—1 CD H CO > 0 p P O CO H o CO CO LO 0 0 i-1 0 3 CO p i—1 O CO On! CM O rd Pm a O P p p 0 0 £ 0 £ -H *H 0 Pm CD 03 05 to 0 S 1 >< 1 Pi I P ! >i f >1 £ £ £ P i—1 P 1—1 P H P: H P h >,H 0 0 £ £ II rd p IP P >1 P >i P P P >i P P P P P P U U CO < 03 g a -p a p O P 0 P 0 P £ P £ P £ P • £ 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P 0 P 0 P 1 ! 1 l & 0 £ £ 0 £ 0 £ 0 £ 0 £ 0 P -H P -H p •H • p <2 m 03 £0 03 ffl 03 CQ 03 PQ 00 P 03 P CO P i—1 CM CO -=0 fp

66 i/-?

!-r

CO H to ro h- CD

O CD G CO H- 4- 0< H' H, H-

J> 0 U>

4

Hi Hi

rt“ J. Hi

H- Q

H- •n H-i 67

Of 192 patients with hand malformations, 19 were found

also to have a congenital heart abnormality. Of 267 patients with normal hands, 8 had a congenital cardiac defect.

TABLE IV

Patients with Patients without Totals hand hand anomalies anomalies

Patients with congenital heart lesions 19 8 27

Patients without congenital heart lesions 173 259 432

Totals 192 267 459

This data was analyzed by the chi-square method using

Yates correction for continuity. Chi-square is then 8.41 with one degree of freedom, which is significant at the p <,0.01 level and shows that the association of hand anomalies and heart malformations is statistically significant as regards the null hypothesis.

Of those with hand abnormalities 9.9% also had a congenital heart lesion. Of those without hand malformations, only 3.0% also had a congenital cardiac defect. Thus those with hand anomalies had a statistically significant three¬

fold increase in congenital cardiac malformations. 3

_____—-

ec i'J.pmcns . ___

riixw ainsxiB*! anoleal ~?£s;. iBixnspnoo

in odd xw ain9xis

elBioT

j*r . i r> srii '”1. >ssY-t - ns ,-SW siB;.- ■ -iriT

-

ax doxriv , irrobesxi io eaipsb sno dixw

ids bn&r riixw 9aodi 50

. noxasl i‘i69d l65ifi9pnoo

b bed osIb £0.£ Y^no

s bsd aailensoriB bnsri riixw DISCUSSION

Both upper extremity and congenital cardiac malformations were considerably more common in this mentally retarded, state- institutionalized population than in the general population.

This suggests that the agent which produced mental retardation was often sufficiently damaging to produce other associated anomalies.

None of the cases of the Holt-Oram syndrome previously recorded in the literature (See Appendix I) had been described in mental defectives. Only one case which probably fits into the Holt-Oram pattern was found in this survey of an institution for the mentally handicapped (patient number 1775).

This patient was a fifteen-year-old white female who was felt on clinical examination (including radiological four-way view of the heart with contrast media) to have an atrial septal defect (permission for confirmatory cardiac catheterization was refused). Her electrocardiogram was abnormal with a P-R interval of 0.14 seconds, long for a rate of 120 beats/minute.

It also showed right axis deviation and right . Roentgenogram of the upper extremities showed on the right hand a lack of the first metacarpal and two rudimentary phalanges on a fingerlike thumb. The right multangulum major and minor were fused and the navicular was either absent or fused with the multanguli. The other carpals were normal. The terminal phalanx of the left fifth finger was short and the tuft of the terminal phalanx of the fourth

68 UOJ 3U33IG

. SSXlB/nOflB

. savii-03:s|> Isd-nsm ni

:t •• d'3-vx^noo rf# i v; Jx6 3fi grid- 1 o wsiv

.4 pii £ ■ wort a osls 31

.Y^qoiiisqYrf

M’i briB J'xoria 2BW 69

finger was notched. Skeletal age was between 13 years and

13 years, 6 months, by the standards of Gruelich and Pyle

(1959), for a chronological age of 14 years, 4 months.

The number of patients with both cardiovascular

lesions and hand anomalies was too small to enable one to

determine whether specific types of each malformation were

associated. However, several interesting observations can be made from inspection of the table of hand and heart defects

observed to be associated.

Atrial septal defect was associated only with brachydactyly. Of five patients with brachydactyly and

congenital heart disease, two had atrial septal defect and two had atrial and ventricular septal defects. The fifth patient with brachydactyly was found at autopsy to have a patent foramen ovale.

Both of the patients with patent ductus arteriosus also had arachnodactyly. The other three patients with arachno-

dactyly also had aortic incompetence; two of these three had

the typical anomalies of Marfan's syndrome.

None of the patients with hand malformations had trans¬

position of the great vessels or persistent truncus arteriosus.

However, both these lesions have a high early mortality and

patients with these defects might not have lived long enough

to be admitted to Sonoma State Hospital.

The most important finding of this study is that the

incidence of congenital heart malformation was significantly . y. . dslo;-' . rj9r{o-lon ssw xspnxd

i' a EX.aor •; , sissy £1

i iiw adnoxdisq do ^sdjimn sriT

-d sx,vi ssilfimons bnsrf bnt> anoxssl

• ‘txns( 3 tt ed dorfv; onxmisdsb

. bs.jBi0O?2£

..d&j - dd i ffci 709';s. J crodd sbsm sd

.h-jfaj.DOc.ai6 od od boviesdo

dogdsb Ifidqoe tfiiddA

.ylydosb^rfosid

. sxi cw , sesseib da^sd IfsdinspnoD

■fr.tr; a siuoiddDov bns Isidds bed

' .nxod bb’v v I yd ox bvj Jrj f i d ridxw due idea

.sIbvo nsmexod dnsdsq

sq ri. iw sdaexdBq odd do rfdoH

dBsiti odd do ncidxaoq

od boddxmbs sd od 70 higher in those with hand anomalies than in a control group without hand anomalies. However, this is a pilot study and this finding should be reconfirmed in mentally normal children.

It would seem that the physician could indeed use the presence of an upper limb anomaly seen on physical examination to alert him to the increased probability of congenital heart disease. It would be important for him to follow and reevaluate the child so that defects discovered later can be either palliated or corrected before irreversible pulmonary hypertension has set in. oH . aailB/Hone fonsri luoxiliiw

■dq aril isxii nraaa bLuow II

•ISiTTorns dxn.il Ttaqqrr njs to aonasaxq

j'igni aril ol nixrf lials oi

. . slice nu . d follow II .sssaeib Ixsaxi

ollafo Isiil oa fol.'ric axil elBu.tsveax

lolad foalosTxioo 10 foalsillsq :tarllia

.ni las 8sri noxsnaliaqYri SUMMARY

This survey of the association of congenital hand and heart malformations was carried out in a California state hos¬ pital for the mentally retarded. As the association of hand and cardiac anomalies in Down's syndrome is well known, patients with this diagnosis were excluded to avoid prejudicing the data, but all other patients who were resident in the hospital while the study was done were included, regardless of diagnosis.

On visual inspection of 2985 patients 216 were found to have hand malformations, consisting of ectrodactyly, polydactyly, syndactyly, unequal length, arachnodactyly, brachydactyly, or short and/or incurved fifth finger.

Cardiac evaluations were completed on 192 of these patients with hand anomalies of whom 19 were found to have congenital cardiac defects.

cardiac evaluation of a randomly chosen sample of

267 patients without hand anomalies, 8 had congenital heart abnormalities.

Thus, 459 mentally retarded, state institutionalized patients had evaluations for the presence of hand and heart

anomalies. Those patients with hand malformations had a

statistically significant threefold increase in the prevalence of congenital cardiac defect as compared to a randomly selected

control group with normal hands. However, the numbers were not sufficiently large to enable one to correlate specific

71 bsixxso 2bw snoxdBrooilBnj ilBSll

BilsmoriB Dfixbifio bns bn&d

istidc 11b djxd , £d£b aril pnxoxbu§9:cq

.axaonpBxb ib 2E9lbi;Bp9'x

:noo . snoxdBmxoxIsni bnBri ovsrl od

.iqmoo sxsw snoxIbxtIbvs OBxbxsO

EsilsmonB bnsii ridiw

. adDQisb OB/.b'XBO

’.driQxiBq Yd£

xbo iBdinspnoo lo 72

kinds of congenital heart lesions.

It would seem that the physician who finds on examination of the infant a hand abnormality should be alerted to follow the child for congenital heart disease. ol d'iBBri Ib d in 9 orioo ito a bn id

r rid- meva

onds bnsri a Jaalai sdd do 73

Aj>p&n ch / Pc d /' <=? v'C eS qC pe ci cas^ s o-f ff\ € hi <3 I j~ - o_ .r' 3_ P'1 ^ynd^me. Wifd O.Coc>'n^\ pa ny l O cj ch\'£>ns> o tser\/edJ

S\j rubais used: c “5 ke! <&+a, I a- n om a, \ y

3 Car'd f O Vascular' anorv^^ly TB Ib-ieKc? \J 3s c^-i le>r 3nc>>'nalvj pr^boXle s SKelesV-ad annno s-ly pr babble 0 CarjfD^asc u.|ar" and sKe lefal a n c rn 3 | TeS pro h a b l e.

Hc>l+ and Ov'9m) 146=0

X

X

TU

IX

McKl35ick; l^ci and W6>4

J1 ’*

Ze-H-e r^vis-^ ; I 4

•-r-D

TL 6 1 J li ‘ 74

J3

i ~> X °~ -©

H thy® O-yfc D—®D.i ^,0-yO4 0 I tH-fc—a

|4 { 15 jff A A 3o^5*4 A> i ’''^5'^ "i" £TA ' "6

Pruzansk/,

X ' D-y® 4 *■

H °y^1 X i XXa ’i

TX ‘Jfcy-o b‘A li> 15 £ DyS"

ET Q X tl kui n>

Holme6 , /^^X

h 3 m i !\j M DyO rO

3L D ~V ihyO t!ll—O 5ro A

jjl iAi (!) AT)

Fa no i H !y X *T° it otf“4 XXt vXXTX •*- + +

ill- £X

Lewi's, Bruce, Baumt and Mokulsky, IHS

6ra//; S+ern , Cohen, Adarr->s, and Cavi'd so n , • 1

' 76

F'a m i l\/ TP -p T _ i 1 0~t~D~ -o L TL Ch^TT £ ~£ in .Cl

th /

D- -O

XL t> r~r

Cascos Jcj£>'7

D-t^O

J_L 'fri -

4 HI

* 77

Symbols used in charts following detailing the specific lesions observed

Captions Upper-extremity abnormalities R=Right F=Fingerlike L=Left 3=Three phalanges C=Carpals 2=Two phalanges MC=Metacarpals A=Absent F=Forearm +=Abnormal E=Elbow S=Shoulders S/=Sternum

Family member I-l=Number on pedigree chart

Age Age is in years, a.=alive d.=dead

Cardiac defects CHD=Congenital heart disease ASD=Atrial septal defect VSD=Ventricular septal defect PFO=Patent foramen ovale PDA=Patent ductus arteriosus PPH="Primary pulmonary hypertension" l=Suspected 2=Clinical examination including cardiac x-rays with barium swallow 3=Cardiac catheterization and/or angiocardiography 4=Surgery 5=Autopsy

Cardiac catheterization R=Right L=Left

Electrocardiogram PVC=Premature ventricular contraction P-R=P-R interval measured in seconds A-V=Atrial-ventricular IRBBB=Incomplete right bundle branch block RBBB=Right bundle branch block RVH=Right ventricular hypertrophy LVH=Left ventricular hypertrophy RAD=Right axis deviation ' 78

CD Qa >1 fa

CO

CO +

fa fa +

u U S + i p *H fa tn m fa E fa C P fa co fa fa fa E rd fa P fa tn cn •H O •H u

fa > rd fibrillation P fa ■H rd fa •- U a) > P 00 O i—i fa rd cm p fa U • fa •H • *■ >lO o fa fa fa CD rP fa rd fa I-1 P fa P I fa S K fa fa p o •H fa rd N •H P O (U rd fa

o rd •H fa 1—1 1—1 1-1 1-1 LD CN p Q Q Q Q P Q rd o fa fa fa fa CO CO U fa CO U U U U =71 S fa rd E S *fa fa i—I p S fa fa fa LD fa lO fa Osl d) CM CO CN •H rd rd p CO rd ld C' P co 00 rd 1 i—l lo 1 fa LO >1 E CN 0) rd i Q) 1 rd ! 0) H O H P fa rd fa 1 P P • M P • H P • H P • H P • H P • P fa 1—1 H fa' fafa H far fa H far fa H Cnfa H P fa H rd

79

rd

\ co

co

Cm W +

U + + + +

Cm tn co oo 00 00 00 04 £ p Cm Cm Cm i—i g P Q 0 rd P Pd P Q O o rd o o P Pd O <] •H O 0 pd 0 ad g < rd in o CM CD o 4-1 *H Pd pd IP'H a) P > Pd Pd a, CD >1 • “I—1 >1 p p 05 CO -P -H 4-1 pd o p Pd p • «. rd rd rd rd Pd Pd >1 tJ1'—1 rd Q 4-1 p rd P o p O rH P Pd CM p rd P Pd < P Pd 0 0 Pd o OP"" p CM Pd Pd I Pd 0 Pd p U Pd p 0 a (D p • p 0 PM > pq rd •H 0 -p co P co a-H co O CD p co • *. rd Cm l—1 a g o P pd Pd PM tn 4-) o 1—1 •H *H P CD co +J -H 1 rd p •H -H m P 04 0 o 0 w CO £ •h Pd a) co CO PM 5 rd in £ Pd CO 0 Pd o a P O *H -p rcS P O P O N 44 -h 04 -H 4-1 4-1 -H CO -P w 4-) P P P co co w in P P O 0) CL) rd 0 0 Pd pd rd -P U rH O i—1 co CO -h a) U pL, CO o a w ^ pd POP POP a a p -P CO a.-H in a-H t 1-1 t rH rd rd P >1 CD P >4 0 1 \ 1 \ V o P Pd > P Pd > p 00 P CM *0 o rd -P "M1 0} 05 CD •- P P fM 04 err 00 P *> P Q Q i—1 Q Q Q o Q O CO CO CO CO CO 0 CO 0 U 05 < < p C < 00 <1 CO ■H > 4-1 •H >i in 0 Pd 0 CO 0 * 0 in i—I cd 0 1—1 cn O £ 0 1—1 a a O ■H I 'cr i—i a 0 !-1 •H 1—1 a 0 p CD uo a g 0 H tog CO 04 1 o g 0 i—1 1 0 id rd Cd H • > p 0 <* P 1 H p 0 4-1 i • H P P Cm rd H rd 1—1 PM 4-t rtf P H H a mm 4-1 H 0 h a -p O 0 co S C-4 u> i

Study , Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S S age defect catheterization R L gersMC E t—i O'. 40 co 13 n 4-1 n co g o g *. <- - •h g •H D-io ■h n '— -H0 — cr A 13 U = gCD •H CD4M nog 13 C4 g t g dp -p >i n o 4-> eg -pg -P ■p g ■g e- 1 C>1 n g -P -H 04 n rM g -p og -P o ,(D OCD it £g g rH^ g -h o g n u cdg g -Pcd g o• CD >1 g a) go g o13 g i—i g cd >i g a g g en p tn gn g o egg o g 0 CD CD iHg Ui -H g >o ^ -P4-> g cdn g CD 13nM g o o a g i—i^ CD i—1 g i—i g cd mary p .ension - >(D ■H ■h n •H CD 13 -h g -p 4-) (L) U g *H g g g g -h g g CD -H g o g o Ele showed right block i—1 Cm < n + cc CM 04 CM -p H S 40-H CD o g + 1 n _ ^ 13 4M 0 13 o -P a) g 0 -H g • 0 4-> g g CM fa fa ■H CM + 04 04 eg H CO -p H g CD g i CM •H CO + 04 04 eg CO -p h g H • g CD g 1 CM CT) n Oh + -p + S3 s H H 0 g g o g e g p i ■H -P 04 e 0 g g g O i—1 a cd P >» i—1 Cm Cm 40 n 04 04 eg H Q1" h g■ H P'£? 1 0? + 4-1 CD g < + 00 04 o 04 Q c H H H Cm *- 1 •H 13 p 04 n -P -p e a np g g -p o g g i—i O CD CD 0 g • P (D g • P tncM uo 4m -p CD o Do Cm 80 1—1 ■h e + o H • H CO • 04 Cm H 13 0 g 1 CO 0 1—1 •H ■H 13 n 4-1 13 4-1 -p -p eg n UO M m -P 04 04 eg CD g a (D O CD H 13= g 0 g g g 0 g g g g 0 CD g g 1 co g 4m 13 0 e -h o g • o ■rM - 13 CD CD a g g g g

!

Study Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S S Karyotype age_de feet_catheterization_R L gersMC E_ II-6 Sister PPHl ' ' ' A + ~+ + + + X X X •H < + i—1 + + + + H H H a) 0 (D I rH o rd • -H Cl x) rH Pm P it C 0 5h N - I—1 < CM rd < X o H tT'r0 PM 73 + fd g o x 5h x: g o 0 !h 1 p• g CM XJ o i—i ft Q M ft CQ m CQ < Cm ft < X < CO Q + + + H H It 0 P • (. rd f rtf i • CM 03 LO CM 0 B 0 o g g p fd • cm 0 I • • "HPi Cl ■H Xi 03 X -P PM ft 5-1 5-1 o p 0 i—1 0 0 0 0 o g g g 0 ft a. 0cm g 0 p • - •»» Q B 0 CO rd • CM I-1 1—1 i—1 s H CO is > rd 0 5-1 b o P B 0 g 0 1 i—! 0 # ■H CM x: Xi o 00 o Cl o Cl CO it PQ X < x> Cl, ft ft Q H H H Q + + + p 0 0 p £ • - ! 1 I • • X! '—1 -P 0 g 0 0 p rd • *H i—1 XI X) B rd 0 p b 0 0 g 1—1 O 5-1 Cl 0 X) r-HQ CM CO < x: < H X ft X! ft 0 H >i S ft cq 0 PQ P CQ X + H PM < Q + + 0 0 p g 0 •- p 1 *H!> ! • -HCt CM x: 03 4J •- x 0 p 0 0 o g p B ft 0 g • g • - ln CM I—1 CO i—1 < < H U ft S H Ph X Q + + + 0 5-1 B rd 0 0 p g 0 1 1-1 g 0 g U CM CO 0 »

I 82 CD CD 1-1 1-1

-p i—1 i—1 1 g g fd g p p u g p rd 0 O CD 0 s S M-f £

co + + +

CO

Pm w + + + +

u u s + + + co i p g a> ■h tr> + + + + + Cm CO 23 CM 1-1 < c

g rd e«* p 03 tr> CO CO CQ O p p 03 CD •H G £3 03 • P CO CO fd o rd ... p u • V CD 03 o 00 CM LD i—1 J> •o I p CD • O'! • i—1 CM -p O O fd o 0) CU 9^ g - 0) -P 03 -p 03 P o fd i fd I j> O o w 03 CM 03 CM S rH G o ■H in G >i

o a g >i 1—I 23 p CP £3 O O MCO •H a 4-> rd O 4-> CO fd 4-) rd 4-> 0 > 4-1 p *H O G o 0 2d CD CM ffjN CM • .. p td CM p MM Q CpQ a < rd a rd CD CO a in CO p 0 MM CO o 't3 o> < p. CM c u > CM a 0 > 1—1 • S 1—1 :—1 rd p p fd <—1 fd 1—1 G CU aj £3 td G fd P p 23 23 p G p G a) p CU -p g a> P a) p 4-) LD CU 4-1 0 CD 4-) CD 4-> 1 g (U H P l p H P I G H P CD i—I 8 H H 23 fd CJ> H O • > 0 • H O H G • H 0 • g •H H » H » H p Cm fd H a. fd H o fd H u H fd td h a rd 1—1 g H fd H id H -p o td CO Cm

Study Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S S' Karyotype age__defect_catheterization_R L gers MC E_ III-14 "" VSD^ Normal; rate 140- F2 F2 + Normal male Propositus, sinus; P-R 0.16 1—1 6 05 0) IT) e O rd • • X rd —r— -P •H 1• 1—1 1-1 fa £ Hrd rd CO CO 4p PQ in Q H fa CQ CQ fa C fa fa 0 P CN nd cn 0) O P P <—l Cd CO CN CO < ft x < H H Q fa + £ 0 3 >i 0 P P -P 0 (D Pi P >i w 1 «. *H X t 4-> Q 0 P O 0 P 0 • P 0 p 0) CntN i *P nd ■H P O rd p rd ■H x 0 o p U1 t 4-1 -p 0 Q) O 1-1 CO H U ft H Q 1 X P 4-> 44 Q mi 0 0 • P P tn-H O >i 1—1 ^ -H CO 44 U It h m H • Q O 0 p P I >i P 0 1—1 LO -H CO 44 U m H • Q O 0 p 1 p 0 >1 CO CO cn i—1 Q., 83 CO < H H Q Pm > ft x + + £ (D O P P >i P -P 0 P 1 •H X 4-1 Q 0 p 0 • 0 P 0 p to 00

84

CD CU fa O 0 g p p 0 o fa s

in + + + +

m + +

fa W + + + + +

U u s + + + +

1 0 P P •H 0 + + fa tn 0

g hp + fa t ft ft C p 44 Eh fa + fa fa ft ft ft

g 0 P tn 0 ■H fa b 0 fa p P > PQ 0 -H I fa Q o fa t fa fed p o fa W Cn ^ rQ fa fa p o ■H fa 0 LD N VO •H CTi p 0 0 0 fa 0 >i i—i CM tn b 44 fa 0 >1 0 P p fa 0 0 p P p •H 0 0 l—1 tn 0 o 0 b u 0 P 0 fa fa 1—1 fa p fa 44 1 p ** rtf 1 p 0 0 0 00 0 0 IT" Pa fa g fa ■ 0 3 g o 3 0 0 0 0 p P p 0 P 0 LD CM 0 -p b 0 0 b 0 0 bOM i—1 m I—I * r 1 0 p 0 fa •H p -p -H 0 0 *• rtf b 0 0 p 44 > P • 44 > g fa g 00 g p fa fa tn 0 Q 0 Q tn 0 0 P P Q p 0 0 0 •H 1-1 m 0 in *H 1-1 p o 0 fa o

o b O- O’ fa p 0 -t 0 > p 0 44 0 s > s subclavian right heart strain 0 p fa i—1 i—i p p 0 0 0 p 0 0 fa P P p 0 fa fa g 0 P P 0 0 44 44 44 0 0 0 fa 0 i—1 44 fa tn tn g P fa P fa 0 fa 0 P p • P p P 0 P 0 P 0 fa 0 o 0 0 0 >i fa fa 0 fa P 44 Q fa g fa Q i—1 b b b 00 CM CM •H •- p r" p VO P VO I 00 CM CM oo oo fa VO 00 >1 g 0 0 1 0 i 0 I 0 H I 1 I i b 0 tn •H fa p • H p H P • H • > • > o > !> •

p fa 0 £ H tn 0 H tn H ID 0 H 0 H b H b H H 0 IV-8 Daughter Anomalous Pulmonary First degree a. 9 right hypertension A-V block; RVH; fa fa

Study / Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S S' Karyotype age_defeet_catheterization_R L gers MC e_ III-3 Mother ASD3 + + CM • IT) p ca co ca p > Q h rd Q £ k> • CD p rd 0 P • Or 1 CM •H 3: i—l 1—1 O CM 2 ca u H rd > • td C a) g D"> e 0 p rd 0 g 1 P c c + + e rd CD P CP rd o CD •H •H -P IP IP 2 1—1 + + + rH p Eh ca H > p CD p CD oncO. cd tap CD o g 0 CD g o P rd CD CP CD g 1 1—1 p > < p CO PCM rO 0 o * O O P rd £ i • • •H •H p -p p i—1 p p o g CD p CD g p CD CD CD CD > ■p rt pi p o o g o 0 g p CO 1-1 1-1 1—1 (p 2 + P LD P + + 2 2 H £ P H rd H • 0 e rd CD X o CD p 0 P £ rd 0 E rd O CD P p 1 CM *H t nC ca O CP CD g CD 3 CO H m m i—1 CM CP CQ ca ca C a H > «- o g i CD rd • CO rH JO, [p IP p p rH CO + ca ca CP P p < Q > Q H Id Q !> • P >1 £ CD Q p rd CD p g >1 CD CD g p P 0"> p rd 1 O •H 0 g •H 1—1 < IP + + P PI + LD 2 W p H H H s P 0 P £ rd P CD CD p g 0 1 *H -H i—l CM CM p p o g 0 p 0 g rd p >i gp O o P rd o rd • -H rdp P rH g0 POO P tn £ 0 £ £

'

86

+

+

Em Em

Em Em

0 00 rM I •v i—1 O Oh p P -p > P in 0 p 0 >H rM i—1 o xs -H w 40 fd 0 in p p g p 4-> P Jh *H u p p o 4-1 p o 0 rM o X P s > P o 0 > u I—I !m 0 in O 40 p P p •h P o 0 0 u u -H Pd •H r—1 "vT 0 -P >i co 0) >i in p •> On p p -P p p geo P P 0 P P CL) o g cn i i P +J r-TO P -P p p • pro 0 P P 0 6 (D U rH g Q) p • • MM p rM t—1 EX >H 0 o r—1 Oh p tr> -p m 0 0 u P P 40 -P p >1 p p P P i—1 40 -P Oh 40 fd P P Oh 40 0 •P -p p p >i p -p > >i-P *p 4-1 >i-p •** to 0 i—1 -P P ■P 40 uro P rM p c P p rH 0) < p Dh tn 0 Q 0 rM 0 Q 0 Oco fd >1 > Q o g ‘H Qh CO ■P P > Oh 1—1 o >i g 1—1 Oh •H 0 P 0 > W g rd p p •H 4-> p p •P P 4-1 co g 4-1 0 0 > -P — -P 0 P 0 PH - in o 40 CO Q Q o mm -p p P Cr> Q Mm On > 4-> Q P P tX> Q CO CO p 0 p X! 0 -H CO 0 p P P Mm CO 0 40 -P CO < > p i—i fd < 4P P > 1 1 co O -H 0 C Oh P P > CO p P ■p 0 p P 0 P 4-> p 0 in 0 P 0 40 0 4-> P 4-1 O 40 tn 40 in 4-1 W U 4-1 P P 4-1 ■p •p *P P P O 0 CO CO 0 CO 4-> Em Q CO s O rH o P UO CM CO CM P LT) i—1 P LD CM CO rM 1—1 I i O g 1 4-1 1 1-1 i—1 I H H P 0 H • m > 1 I • > > > Oh MM > P •P H > > P Q C)

& H

W5 o

sa

P

a. CP

' Study 7 Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S S Karyotype age__defect_catheterization_R L gers MC e_

V-14 Son VSD3 F F + + ■H btP X m Q CP X-*H X H > Pm £ d) O P> P Xd> fti d)p P cd >i co P >iO u Q) fd »- ! -X P *H •H -P P O P CO O b< P (D 0) Q) P M-l CO -P Q-! I—1 CO O cd > cd •— cn i—i i—i cd x ^ x u x CT\ >>x £ X) H > e o 0) cd P > -H P cd 0 X p d) cd P >oX 0 cd p i CO I—I X -p d> o p p O > 0) CO X CM o > in Q -p > Q d) p cd p tm 1 CM x CM i—i in > m X) < Q Q > Q CD p cd P to •- 1 CM X CM in m CO > Q x < Q > Q CD p cd P tn •*. i CO X I—1 in m < Q H X > Pm Q) cd p I X £ cr — <: d» -d* 73 •H V 3 in g cd to cd P c CO ■p 1—1 H Pm £ cd >) c < I—1 in c. H H £ X H d) P cd P cd i X X tn p d> cd cd p p 87 i—i CO X o. H H H £ d> cd P P cd 1 i—1 X P cd X 0) o (U £ fO fd i—i p e IV-l Mother ASD, L—^R shunt; Arrhythmia; RBBB a. 47 secundum^ mild pulmonary hypertension Vi

. s

88 a,0 >1 4-1 4-1 +j CO g CO g 1-1 d) rH d) i—I 03 o i—I cd 1—1 cd rd i—i rd i—1 cd i—I >. ■H *H £ rd £ cd £ cd e • E • E E £ E £ E £ rd o > !Z 4-1

03

03 + +

PH K + + + +

U U S + + + + I g •H + + + Eh C/3

£ gi + C < ps p CO ro Eh PE Eh + Eh IE

e rd PQ I PQ Ei PQ C PQ tT> PQ O PQ 0 PE 03 PE ■H 0) H g 05 03 ■H E El •' E4 cd cd tEEP E •H o Q3 O cd £ o 05 O PE e: E i—I I 4-1 +J 4-> P MH Q3 ro o 03 0-1 4J xi PQ 0 CD E > i—I -H E PQ jx| ■H ' r—I I O jC E PQ 0 W h C & IS C PE lX o g 03 4-) 03

44 44 1-1 >1 g g \ •' E p h P CO 0 0 -g \ 4E • E •e g 0 04 0 ro 0 0 o pH o £ PE PE P g rH > 0 p t t 1-1 44 PE i-Q'tf P rd 0 •O' - > 1—1 - ro ro ro . - >1 0 ro £ £ £ £ 0 E E £ u 3 3 3 P 44 0 0 3 cd +j 03 1—1 mi m 05 0 g -g m . 3 4 c rd g g g E 0 CE CO g >• 3 £ V. p - p v p 0 £ *H CO - p u E PQ o n u Q 0 05 i—1 E 03 Q 0 0 O 03 0 03 0 03 0 0 P 0 i—1 03 0

U 05 0 S < 03

0 E i—1 0) to -Q *• E E g *• e 0 0 0 0 w 0 03 p 4Q l rC P p £ 44 44 4-4 H 44 44 05 44 •H O i—1 H O •H g •H in E 0 E S 0 0 0 0 0 O 03 PQ m 0 CO >i

P PE £ 0 > > 03 0 0 H 0 H PE 04 0 1-1 IH PE 4H III-3 Daughter ASD, F2 4-1 IE 03 r~

fu.

* i

Study y Family member; Cardiac Cardiac Electrocardiogram ThumbsFin- C F S Sy Karyotype age defect catheterization R L gers MC E CD i—1 CT\ u Ifl O 0 (d w *■ cm ph m r\j o CN t—i P4 Em Em Oh t—i d + + Z S CN -p h rd g o E fd E o 0) 1 i • co •H d d XX CA i—1 CTv d co a) < cn Q O 4-1 Q H fd H • id o fd E fd g g w E >i g QJ E fd Cn 1 " Ed d rH K d 4-) H o m fd o o (D 0 K C CQ W Q g a g 3 . s < cq •E rH •• rH 0 Mh co -p +> < 4J .. CM P rH o i E > E i—1 •S 0 g 1 *. d oo g 0) o g g W td • •H d -P g Ed O 0 g o 0 ■H •^ •H oOh d a) d a> CO XX fd S mh < CO -PH Em co no d + + co a) e 4-1 ft w Q o 0 Cl fd H • Q h fd fd o fd E a, fd g m g pq worn E i—1 >i w g QJ E td tn 1 - g PH d d g g 89 . BIBLIOGRAPHY

American Medical Association Conference on Mental Retardation,

"Mental Retardation," Journal of American Medical

Association 191, 183-232, 1965.

Anderson, Ray C., "Causative Factors Underlying Congenital

Heart Malformations: I. Patent Ductus Arteriosus,"

Pediatrics 14, 143-152, 1954.

Arey, Leslie Brainerd, Developmental Anatomy, 5th ed.,

Philadelphia, Saunders, 1946.

Arey, Leslie Brainerd, Developmental Anatomy: A Textbook

and Laboratory Manual of Embryology, 7th ed., Philadelphia,

Saunders, 1965.

Barr/ Murray, "Some Properties of the Sex Chromosomes and

Their Bearing on Normal and Abnormal Development," in

Second International Conference on Congenital Malformations,

Morris Fishbein, ed., New York, The International Medical

Congress Ltd., 11-21, 1963.

Barsky, Arthur Joseph, Congenital Anomalies of the Hand and

Their Surgical Treatment, Springfield, Illinois, Charles

C. Thomas, 1958.

Bass, Allan D. and Moe, Gordon K., Congenital Heart Disease,

Washington, D. C., American Association for the

Advancement of Science, 1960.

90 ; £ no i i s r/n ol I £. M jib aH

. f>ppi Cci-EM ,m. aoxidsxbsq:

vJ.'-nA 1 gdritj/ngolsvsC vbxBnis-xH silasJ ,V9xA

pc ov JttL io LBxin&N yiodsiQdgJ boe

. dPI , a^obm/isB

39J xoqona mo 3" n*yibQ

, .bs ^nxod.dax'J aixioM

. c. 9P1 ^IS-II , .hdJ asotcpnoD

. 8 c PI , ssmoriT . D

siza So dnomoonsvbA 91

Bell, Julia, "On Brachydactyly and Symphalangism," The

Treasury of Human Inheritance 5_, 1-31, 1951.

Bell, Julia, "On Syndactyly and Its Association with Poly¬

dactyly," The Treasury of Human Inheritance 5_, 32-50 , 1953.

Bell, Julia, "The Laurence-Moon Syndrome," The Treasury of

Human Inheritance 5_, 51-96 , 1958 .

Bick, Edgar M., "Congenital Deformities of Musculoskeletal

System Noted in Newborn," Journal of Diseases of Childhood

100 , 861-868 , 1960 .

Birch-Jensen, Arne, Congenital Deformities of the Upper

Extremities, Odense, Denmark, Andelsbogtrykkereiti, 1949.

Blattner, Russell J., "Impact on the Patient, the Family and

Society," in Second International Conference on Congenital

Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., New York, The

International Medical Congress Ltd., 365-370, 1963.

Boesen, I. S., Melchior, J. C., Tersley, E., and Vendel, S.,

"Extracardiac Congenital Malformations in Children with

Congenital Heart Disease," Acta Paediatrica Supplementa

146, 28-33, 1963.

British Medical Journal (editorial), "Causes of Malformation

of the Heart," British Medical Journal 5_, 891-892 , 1965 .

Brown, W. M. Court, "Sex Chromosome Abnormalities," in First

International Conference on Congenital Malformations, x eiXuL , XXsQ

x .m ^fipba x^toxa

, ,Ii XIssauH ,T9fidiBXa 92

Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co.,

84-88, 1960.

Bunnell, S., Surgery of the Hand, 4th ed., Philadelphia,

Lippincott, 1964.

California State Department of Mental Hygiene, Instructions

For Reporting 1959 AAMD Terminology and Classification

in Mental Retardation, Unpublished.

Campbell, Maurice, "Causes of Malformations of the Heart,"

British Medical Journal 5_, 895-904 , 1965 .

Carlgren, Lars-Erik, "The Incidence of Congenital Heart

Disease in Children Born in Gothenburg 1941-1950,"

British Heart Journal 21, 40-50, 1959.

Carter, Cedric O., "The Genetics of Common Malformations,"

in Second International Conference on Congenital

Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., New York, The

International Medical Congress Ltd., 297-305, 1963.

/ Cascos, A. Sanchez, "Holt-Oram Syndrome," Acta Paediatrica

Scandinavia 56, 313-317, 1967.

Cooke, Robert E., "The Postnatal 'Prevention' and Correction

of Congenital Defects," in Second International Conference

on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed.. New

York, The International Medical Congress Ltd., 386-393, 1963.

Corner, George W., "Congenital Malformations: The Problem bs , nx9ddc:x3 ai^ioM

.Odei ,88-£8

3 ^Xl9nnua

. ;■ xei .diooxiiqqxJ

da x I due rtU * noXdsf d Is insM nx

, soxnxrfiM , IlsdqoiBO

soi -^bionl 9riT,: , dxna-ans J

nx nnoH nsmbXiriD nx saBssxG

x IS IsnxuoL d xeaH xi8xdi~xS

Xo soxdsnsO sdT" , .0 oxnbsD ^xbixsD

assnpnoD IsoibsM X£noxdennedaI

.t serion^S .A xeooabD

dT" ,.3 dnsdoH %9^IooD

Ou-tBrniQi IeM XedxnepnoD no

V.W spno9D ,nennoD and the Task," in First International Conference on

Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ea.,

Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co., 7-17, 1960.

Cowrie, Valerie, "Genetic Background and the Changing Back¬

ground of Medical Genetics," in Second International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein,

ed., New York, The International Medical Congress Ltd.,

371-376, 1963.

Crow, James F., "Population Genetics Studies," in Second

International Conference on Congenital Malformations,

Morris Fishbein, ed., New York, The International

Medical Congress Ltd., 314-322, 1963.

David, Milton, Acrocephalosyndactyly--, Sonoma

State Hospital Seminar, Unpublished.

Edwards, J. H., "The Epidemiology of Congenital Malformations,"

in Second International Conference on Congenital Mal¬

formations , Morris Fishbein, ed., New York, The

International Medical Congress Ltd.., 267-305 , 1963.

Ehlers, Kathryn H. and Engle, Mary Allen, "Familial Congenital

Heart Disease: I. Genetic and Environmental Factors,"

Circulation 34, 503-516, 1966.

Erhardt, Carl L., "Epidemiological and Statistical Pitfalls

in Investigations of Etiology," in First International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ?[sbT Grid- bras

onxgqxJ ,8. .1 sjsiriqlsbsli/iq

sS oi^GHGO" .GXisIfiV ,eiiwo3

GH90 IfioibsM io bnuoip ■

tx [oxd-f5ni3r.nl srfT ,, r-tiaY weW * .£>9

.Cdei xdT£>lV£

id or noix£.raqocI" , „a esmsL *woi3

- a ;HicY wsW ,.ba , nxsdrisix axuo

, $bT-M£ , »bdJ aasi^noD XeoibsM

. I'y-o£./ ^v oiBrigGooiDA tnod-IiM %bivBO

: J , xsnimsB Isbxaeoil sdsd-2

v.H .L ,abiBwba

l' -. ■ n . x/x-.d v;.< , sisXria 94

ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co., 25-33, 1960.

Fish, Stewart A., "Environmental Teratogens and Birth Defects,"

Journal-Lancet 85, 208-212, 1965.

Ford, C. E., "Chromosomal Abnormality and Congenital Mal¬

formation," in Ciba Foundation Symposium on Congenital

Malformations, G. E. W. Wolstenholme and Ceceilia M.

O'Connor, eds., London, J. and A. Churchill Ltd., 32-50,

1960 .

Gall, John C., Jr., Stern, Aaron M., Cohen, Maimom M., Adams,

Morton S., and Davidson, Ruth T., "Holt-Oram Syndrome:

Clinical and Genetic Study of a Large Family," American

Journal of Human Genetics 18, 187-200, 1966.

German, James, Ehlers, Kathryn A., and Engle, Mary Allen,

"Familial Congenital Heart Disease: II. Chromosomal

Studies," Circulation 34, 517-533, 1966.

Giroud, A., "Causes and Morphogenesis of Anencephaly," in

Ciba Foundation Symposium on Congenital Malformations,

G. E. W. Wolstenholme and Ceceilia M. O'Connor, eds.,

London, J. and A. Churchill Ltd., 199-218, 1960.

Gruelich, William Walter and Pyle, Sarah Idell, Radiographic

Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist, 2nd

ed., Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1959.

Grumbach, Melvin M., Lydon, Mary F., Lejeune, Jerome, Fruccaro,

M. , Edwards, R. G., Witschi, Emil, Makino, Sahiro, ^BirlqlsbBlxft*? , .be

c 8 d son&J-13 iviu oL

ydilenncondA IsmoeomoiriO" ,-3 .0

3 £ i OV . * . . u . D • c.noXdBfl.-. -LOl 1 fi.'A

i> , ■''' .'••'' nr.oO ' 0

.M noi&A ,rrc.9d3 > . xL y .0 nrloL ,Ils0

, . T rtdnsfL * noabiveCI bne x . 3 noixoM

.bJ h io ybjjJ-3 ol.tensO bn£ IsoinxIO

nyxrfdBX xEi9lria ,BemeL ^nsmieD

z■ e-vre noidBlx/oxiP ",esxbu;t3

iqioM bfiB ssbubD" , .A xb0OiiD

BXlxeoeO bne stnloxlnsdaloW .W .3 .0

l J xrioxy f -D .A bn£ . L ^ nob no-3

i

bxolnj&dS , *.l>9

jxW ^.0 ,3 xsbxswba ^.M 95

Zellweger, Hans U., and Miller, Orlando J., "Cytogenetics

Discussion," in Second International Conference on

Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., New

York, The International Medical Congress Ltd., 61-80, 1963.

Hall, Cameron B., Brooks, Milo B., and Dennis, Jeannie F.,

"Congenital Skeletal Deficiencies of the Extremities,"

Journal of the American Medical Association 181, 590-599, 1962.

Harris, Leonard C. and Osborne, William P., "Congenital Absence

or Hypoplasia of the Radius with Ventricular Septal

Defect: Ventriculo-radial Dysplasia," Journal of

Pediatrics 68 , 265-272 , 1966.

Harris, Lloyd E. and Steinberg, Arthur G., "Abnormalities

Observed During the First Six Days of Life in 8,716

Liveborn Infants," Pediatrics 14, 314-326, 1954.

Higgins, I. T. T., "The Epidemiology of Congenital Heart

Disease," Journal of Chronic Disease 18, 699-721, 1965.

Hill, A. Bradford, Principles of Medical Statistics, 8th ed.,

London, The Lancet Limited, 1966.

Hobbs, Lisa, "Sonoma State: In Crippled Bodies and Minds A

Tough Spirit Grasps At Life," San Francisco Sunday

Examiner and Chronicle, 3, 30, November 12, 1967.

Holmes, Lewis B., "Congenital Heart Disease and Upper Extremity

Deformities," New England Journal of Medicine 272, 437-

444, 1965. mn 5

' sno r^smioll.bM IsdinagnoS

I1.M ,s>[oo^a , .3 noisrtisD ,IIsH

..;. 1 ed r 6^9l3?J3 Isd laspno'1'1

,snio laO ha& . D ErxsnosJ , ax-xtcsH

[Bib-Bi-oIuoi^d-nsV : i09l9d

88 01 v £ V £ ~ c! 8 £ ^ 8 8 ao-rsd-sibed

iri'xxl 9rid pniiua bsvxssdO

Kt solijcibsa " , sin&'inl rrxod9vi.I

j-jV.sMq'i ©fl'J ’ * .T . T .1 , anxppiH

.eaei 96

Holt, Mary and Oram, Samuel, "Familial Heart Disease with

Skeletal Malformations," British Heart Journal 22,

236-242, 1960.

Ingalls, T. H., "Environmental Factors in Causation of Congenital

Anomalies," in Ciba Foundation Symposium on Congenital

Malformations, G. E. W. Wolstenholme and Ceceilia M.

O'Connor, eds., London, J. and A. Churchill Ltd., 51-

77, 1960.

James, Preston M., Congenital Anomalies of the Upper Extremities,

Sonoma State Hospial Orthopedic Grand Rounds, Unpublished.

Keith, John D., Rowe, Richard D., and Vlad, Peter, Heart Disease

in Infancy and Childhood, 1st ed., New York, Macmillan, 1958.

Keys, Ancel and White, Paul D., Cardiovascular Epidemiology,

New York, Paul B. Hoeber, 1956.

Knapp, K., Lenz, W., and Nowack, E., "Multiple Congenital

Abnormalities," Lancet 2_, 725 , 1962.

Kowenow, W., "Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities,"

Lancet 1_, 45-46 , 1962 .

Kretchmer, Norman, "Whither Birth Defects?" Perspectives

in Biology and Medicine 8_, 15-29 , 1964 .

Kuhn, Erich, Schaaf, Johannes, and Wagner, Alfred, "Primary

Pulmonary Hypertension, Congenital Heart Disease, and

Skeletal Anomalies in Three Generations," Japanese vnis 2 ,JnfiiO bns Y^sM v;noH

bfiLro'? Gdi.D ni % asilsmonA

lBd-.nspiioP , .M node si <1 ^ sshibL

bns t .a bnsfioifl , bwoH , .Cl nrloC* ^rldxsX

.

, .E , >[ f v7o:t bns , .W vsnsJ , .X , qqsn)i

% . W ^.onswo/i

, f ' (Io8 x rloi'iS , iiiitrX 97

Heart Journal 4_, 205-223, 1963.

Lamy, Maurice, deGrouchy, Jean, and Schweisguth, Odile,

"Genetic and Non-genetic Factors in the Epidemiology of

Congenital Heart Disease: A Study of 1188 Cases,"

American Journal of Human Genetics 9_, 17-41 , 1957 .

Lamy, Maurice and Frezal, Jean, "The Frequency of Congenital

Malformations," in First International Conference on

Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia,

J. B. Lippincott Co., 33-44, 1960.

Landtman, B., "Epidemiological Aspects of Congenital Heart

Disease," Acta Paediatrica Scandinavia 54, 467-473, 1965.

Lenz, Widkund, "Chemicals and Malformations in Man," in

Second International Conference on Congenital Malformations,

Morris Fishbein, ed.. New York, The International Medical

Congress Ltd., 263-276, 1963.

Lenz, Widkund, "Malformations Caused by Drugs in Pregnancy,"

American Journal of Diseases of Children 111, 99-106, 1966.

Lenz, Widkund, "Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities,"

Lancet 1_, 45 , 1962 .

Lewis, Kenneth B., Bruce, Robert A., Baum, David, and Motulsky,

Arno G., "The Upper Limb-Cardiovascular Syndrome: An

Autosomal Dominant Genetic Effect on Embryogenesis,"

Journal of the American Medical Association 193, 1080-

1086, 1965. c,ei , £££-£0£ , £ IsnxuoL j"xs9H

, YriouoiDef) %eoiiusU xy;mjz,J.

7

-

X"IZ3L v I S T S't'I 5ns BOltUBU x YHIE.I

•mo1 , a :r olds nn c X 1 bM Xsdin&pnoD

.0321 , ££-££ v . oD ddooniqqiJ .a .L

,9Qci Ixc.x^olojfilsbiqa" , .a , nsmbbfifi J

slv.enibnspS soni S-lPse1-! 5ioA. 11 , 98692x0

aXjso xiiit dD " , bau db±W , s ns J

~-rjrt£~ :noD I oiiO-i: 1:: n~i adnI bnoo93

, 3iA , .bs , nisdriai'? aixnoM

.£361 ,5V£-£3£ , „bdJ assnpnoO

ni Eon:cG vd bezuzD snoidsmnod IsM’! ,bnudbiW , sneJ

£ : :p£ss_a / Q to IsnnnoL nsoingmA

bns sbimobilsriT*’ , bni/dbiW ,snsJ

,.S ddsnnsX ,axwsJ

dnsn. nioa IsmoeodnA

. .3 io IsfnxroL

.3361 ,3801 98

MacMahon, Brian, "Association of Congenital Malformation of

the Heart with Birth Rank and Maternal Age," British

Journal of Social Medicine 6_, 178-182 , 1952 .

MacMahon, Brian, McKeown, Thomas, and Record, R. G., "The

Incidence and Life Expectations of Children with Congenital

Heart Disease," British Heart Journal 15, 121-129, 1953.

Martin, J. K., "Congenital Malformations Associated with

Thalidomide and Their Management," American Heart

Journal 67 , 284-285 , 1964 .

Massaumi, R. A., and Nutter, D. 0., "The Syndrome of Familial

Aspects of Heart and Upper Extremities (Holt-Oram

Syndrome)," Circulation 34, 65-76, 1966.

McBride, W. G., "The Teratogenic Action of Drugs," Medical

Journal of Australia 2_, 689-693, 1963.

McBride, W. G., "Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities,"

Lancet 2_, 1358 , 1961 .

McIntosh, Rustin, Merritt, Katharine D., Richards, Mary R.,

Samuels, Mary H., and Bellows, Marjorie T., "The

Incidence of Congenital Malformations; A Study of 5,964

Pregnancies," Pediatrics 14, 505-522, 1954.

McKeown, Thomas, "Sources of Variation in the Incidence of

Malformations," in First International Conference on

Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia,

J. B. Lippincott Co., 45-52, 1960. l£rt3S_rsM bn& MnsH rbtxw d-^ssH

.BsmoriT , awosXoH Xnfixx8 , norifiMofiM

anoii’snno^lBM lE.'txnspnoD" , .)! . Tj AnxiisM

sM xxariT bnis sbifliobilerlT

. 3.SI v68£ i-8£ ,^d IsniuoL

/3 sriT'1 , .0 . G , qsiji.H bfljs * .A .3 ^ xflitfBSSBM aai^ins'xixa xsqqU bri.o dxseH 5o aztosqaA

"N(smoxbnY^

oinsnoifi^sT ©ffT" , .0 .W t3bxxSoM

.£cCI v £ £ B- 98d %£ gxlBx.j auA la fBn-xuoh

1

.IBS! ,8c!£I ,£ leaned

, ilimaM ^nxiaxrH ^rieolnloM

,-oD iloonxqqxJ .8 .L 99

McKeown, Thomas, MacMahon, Brian, and Parsons, C. G., "The

Familial Incidence of Congenital Malformations of the

Heart," British Heart Journal 15, 273-277, 1953.

McKeown, Thomas and Record, R. G., "Malformations in a

Population Observed For Five Years After Birth," in

Ciba Foundation Symposium on Congenital Malformations,

G. E. W. Wolstenholme and Ceceilia M. O'Connor, eds.,

London, J. and A. Churchill Ltd., 2-21, 1960.

McKusick, Victor A., "A Genetical View of Cardiovascular

Disease. The Lewis A. Connor Memorial Lecture,"

Circulation 30, 326-357, 1964.

McKusick, Victor, "Medical Genetics 1960," Journal of

Chronic Diseases 14, 1-198, 1961.

Mellin, Gilbert W. and Katzenstein, Michael, "The Saga of

Thalidomide," New England Journal of Medicine 267, 1184-

1193, 1238-1244, 1962.

Morris, E. W. T., "Embryology of Some Congenital Cardiac

Anomalies," Thorax 20, 158-169, 1965.

Nachtsheim, Hans, "The Interaction Between Genes and

Environment in Development," in First International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein,

ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co., 77-83, 1960.

Neel, J. V., "A Study of Major Congenital Defects in Japanese

Infants American Journal of Human Genetics 10 nbi'j-.a * norfsMobM , esfuoffT .nwosXoM

1 i i n:tJJoL -12^M \^3B9li

. ■ v frxoo-sH fojGLB, gsmoxiT %nwo9XoM

-> i . ,.; no iT.r/xaoqfriYS noiJBbnuo'S sd-rf;

.bbJ IIxrfoiuxID .A bns .L ,nobnoJ

Isoi.'tonsc} A' \ *A xo^ox' ^xloxarj/ jj-

.9SB93XG

,0£ noxJeIuoxxO

,0361 BoiiarsO' laoxbsM" . xoioxV ,jtoxai/XoM

.13PI ,861-1 , M ssessaia oxnoxriD

j :ixc- Ian sb ;X brrs ,‘v died!JtO , riillsh , ,£aei ,f^£j>8££i ,een

GM-82I x&nodT " x oaxIsmonA

rxedril orfT!: , ansB ^inxoriBirfDJsW

IfidinspnoO no aonsxQXnoP

a „ L , Bxrtc lobs I xda: * .b9

xo( bM io YbxrdS A" y .Xi »X , I99W 100

398-445, 1958.

Oppenheimer, B. S., Blackman, N. S., and Grishman, Arthur,

"The Association of the Interatrial Septal Defects and

Anomalies of the Osseous System," Transactions of the

Association of American Physicians 62, 284-293, 1949.

Patau, K., "Partial Trisomy," in Second International Conference

on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., New

York, 52-59, 1963.

Penrose, L. S., "Genetic Causes of Malformation and the Search

For Their Origin," in Ciba Foundation Symposium on

Congenital Malformations, G. E. W. Wolstenholme and

Ceceilia M. O'Connor, eds., London, J. and A. Churchill

Ltd., 22-31, 1960.

Penrose, L. S., "Parental Age and Mutation," Lancet 2_, 312-313, 1955 .

Pfeiffer, R. A. and Kosenow, W., "Thalidomide and Congenital

Malformations," Lancet 1_, 45-46 , 1962 .

Pliess, G., "Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities," Lancet

1, 1128, 1962.

Potter, Edith L., Klein, David, Mellin, Gilbert W., and Heilman,

Louis M., "Incidence: Discussion," in First International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein,

ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co., 53-60, 1960. .8eei

^sjnis/insqqC

i-sioia ;rfq -y. pi •! 10-iisxooasA

sai/fiO oiiansO" ,.8 . J , esoina^

.oaei ,.:e-ss , .mj

. l <3 I , d £—c i* ,1 jeonfid ", s no id- srsn oil bK

a .T_, x£..LjrfqI.9bsXi.ria ,.£>9 101

Pruzanski, W., "Familial Congenital Malformations of the

Heart and Upper Limbs: A Syndrome of Holt-Oram,"

Cardiologia 45, 21-38, 1964.

Public Health Section, "Congenital Abnormalities Due to

Thalidomide," Lancet 2_, 931, 986 , 1962 .

Reynolds, Geoffrey, "The Heart in Arachnodactyly," Guy1s

Hospital Reports 99, 178-209, 1950.

Richards, Mary R., Merritt, Katherine K., Samuels, Mary H.,

and Langeman, Alfred G., "Congenital Malformations of

the Cardiovascular System in a Series of 6,053 Infants,"

Pediatrics 15, 12-32, 1955.

Rhodes, A. J., "Virus Infections and Congenital Malformations,"

in International Conference on Congenital Malforma¬

tions , Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott

Co., 106-116 , 1960 .

Rodhe, Russell A., "The Chromosomes in Heart Disease: Clinical

and Cytogenetic Studies of Sixty-Eight Cases," Circulation

34, 484-502, 1966.

Saldanha, P. H., "Frequency of Congenital Malformations in Mixed

Populations of Southern Brazil," in Second International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein,

ed., New York, The International Medical Congress Ltd.,

323-333, 1963.

Selle, Robert W., Congenital Anomalies of the Hand, Sonoma ,I£e ^ daofi.sJ ", ebi.«,ob ilBfiT

: I , 6 0 £ ~ 8 VI ,_6 8 aliiocsfl I sdigaoH

-j.X ©nxisrid©?! , ddixisM , .51 y^cbM ^sb^srioJbl

Isi- IsdinspnoD" ,.G ba'xtIA .nBMspnsJ bn©

b r i /nadavS ij5Ijjd3£vox£>i.£D ©fid

a aniiV" v.L .A ,asfoorf£

© j. aoD Isnc'XdsnxsdnJ djrxi/3 nx

. od.ei , dix-Box , .od

•^onroT.rif j sriT'1 , A X tsaei/H ^©ribcH

Yonijpsx'I'' , . H .<3 ^srinsblJsS

jfaoY w©fS , .b©

. c. d € I ,£££-£££

I' diri©pncO diedoH ^©IIsS 102

State Hospital Orthopedic Grand Rounds, Unpublished.

Shapiro, Raymond N., Eddy, William., Fitzgibbon, John, and

O'Brien, Gerald, "The Incidence of Congenital Anomalies

Discovered in the Neonatal Period," American Journal of

Surgery 96 , 396-400 , 1958 .

Shaw, Russell G., "The Relative Role of Heredity and Environment

in Congenital Heart Disease: A Review," Journal-Lancet

85_, 519-524 , 1965 .

Smithells, R. W., "Thalidomide and Malformations in Liverpool,"

Lancet 1, 1270-1273, 1962.

Speirs, A. L., "Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities,"

Lancet 1_, 303-305 , 1962 .

Speirs, L., "Ascertainment of Malformations," Lancet 1_, 222 , 1963.

Stecher, Robert M., "Identical Twins Discordant for Inter¬

ventricular Septal Defect and Absent Radius and Thumb,"

American Journal of Human Genetics 9_, 218-223, 1957.

Stevenson, Stuart Shelton, Worcester, Jane, and Rice, Robert

Gerald, "677 Congenitally Malformed Infants and Associated

Gestational Characteristics: I. General Considerations,"

Pediatrics 6_, 37-50 , 1950 .

Storstein, Ole, Roksith, Rolf, and Sdrland, Svein, "Congenital

Heart Disease in a Clinical Material," Acta Medica

Scandinavia 176, 195-200, 1964 3ln% svil&lsZ

.a?ex ,*se-eia ves

.£dei t£TSI~OV&l , I jsonsJ

\ • '-*• •A I 21-L9CJ2

.ssei ,20£-£0£ , I ^so-.isJ

;j " . anoliBiircoi F.bM 16 1 nsmni&liso a A'

ioslsd iBiqsa ^Bluoxiinsv

,blfiisD

, xi:: Jie:?iaH , elO

.fcdfcl ,002-2? 103

Suhr, Otto, ed., Proceedings of the Second International

Congress on Mental Retardation, Basel, Switzerland,

S. Krager, 1963.

Taussig, Helen B., Congenital Malformations of the Heart,

2 vols., Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University

Press, 1960.

Taussig, Helen B., "On the Evolution of Our Knowledge of

Congenital Malformations of the Heart: The T. Duckett

Jones Memorial Lecture," Circulation 31, 768-777, 1965.

Taussig, Helen B., "A Study of the German Outbreak of Phocomelia,"

Journal of the American Medical Association 180, 1106-

1114, 1962.

Turpin, Raymond and Lejeune, Jerdme, "Congenital Human Anomalies

Due to Chromosome Aberrations," in First International

Conference on Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein,

ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co., 70-76, 1960.

Uchida, Irene A. and Rowe, R. D., "Discordant Heart Anomalies

in Twins," American Journal of Human Genetics 9, 133-140, 1957

Wallace, Helen M. , Baumgartner, Leona, and Rich, Herbert,

"Congenital Malformations and Birth Injuries in New York

City," Pediatrics 12, 525-545, 1953.

Warkany, Josef and Kalter, Harold, "Congenital Malformations,"

New England Journal of Medicine 265, 993-1001, 1046-1052, 1961 ,£dGI .2

‘1 '/'is _ , ;j: 98JJ: 3£23£J , Spbl idJilSO , . 3-foV >. .osei x

io .-. ii ju Iovd srid- nO" , .H nsIsH ^piaaxrsT

'- iioiiBflEtoiil sM IsJ-xnepnoO

",9WJo9>I Ifil-xomsM asnoL

IsoxbsM. ixBo.iiom£ aiii xjZ A . . i£L .ssei ,*111

, sixoxis'X^sdA srac ^omoiriD oJ- 9ua

Is j-in

,sxriqj.9beliril ,\b&

oaia" , .Ci ,H , swoH 5ns .A 9fi9il ,s5irfoU

I xTsnjxspmt/sa , .M nsIsH ^sos^IsW

i u rij'ila 5rs artoi^smioilsM Isrt-xnsgnoD"

,SI soxiJsxbsq

sH KisiIs>I bns issol ,yhs^sW 104

West German Health Ministry, "Thalidomide Report," American

Medical Association News, 2, February 12, 1968.

Wiland, Olin K., "Extracardiac Anomalies in Association with

Congenital Heart Disease: Analysis of 200 Necropsy

Cases," Laboratory Investigations 5_, 280-288 , 1956 .

Wilson, James G., "General Principles in Experimental Teratology,"

in First International Conference on Congenital Malformations,

Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Co.,

187-194, 1960.

Wilson, James L., "Congenital Anomalies in Modern Clinical

Medicine," in First International Conference on

Congenital Malformations, Morris Fishbein, ed., Philadelphia,

J. B. Lippincott Co., 264-268, 1960. x Y^ainiM ndlssH nsnrcsQ dasW

S , 3W9M no-CdsiooasA IsoxbsM

osibxBDBxdxSr" ^ . X nilO ,fonsIi:W

a no-i: Jb xJsevnl "<39863

aelqlorcir'I Isnsnsy" ^0 as/nsL ,noalr.W

I~bBl±iiq ^ .bs *ni3clriai3 ainoM

.0D8I ,^ei-V8I

si,ion A Is d.r.ixepnoD" , . J aomfil* NnoaIi.W

, 3nibxb9M

. OdQI , 3’dS-IdS. v ,oD IrooniqqiJ .3 . L