Role of Abdominal Ultrasonography in Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma: a Tertiary Center Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of Abdominal Ultrasonography in Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma: a Tertiary Center Experience ORIGINAL ARTICLE Role of abdominal ultrasonography in clinical staging of pancreatic carcinoma: a tertiary center experience Piotr Kulig, Radosław Pach, Jan Kulig 1st Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland KEY WORDS ABSTRACT abdominal ultrasound, INTRODUCTION Various imaging modalities are used for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. diagnostic accuracy, Abdominal ultrasonography is the most widely available method and usually the first‑line diagnostic tool pancreatic cancer, used in patients with suspicion of pancreatic carcinoma. sensitivity, specificity OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the clinical value of abdominal ultrasonography used in a tertiary center for staging of pancreatic carcinoma. PatientS AND METHODS This prospective clinical trial included 454 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer, who underwent a surgery between 2000 and 2012. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography was established for each T category and lymph node involvement. Computed tomography and intraop‑ erative staging of the pancreatic cancer were used as reference methods. RESUltS The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in cancer staging according to T categories was 94.1% for T1, 95.7% for T2, 85.4% for T3, and 81.7% for T4 tumors. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and assessment of tumor resectability was 66.1% and 74.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study summarize 12 years of our experience with abdominal ultra‑ sonography in patients with pancreatic cancer and confirm that ultrasonography remains a valuable diagnostic modality in this patient group. IntroDUction Pancreatic carcinoma remains Currently, thin ‑section, contrast ‑enhanced one of the leading causes of cancer ‑related deaths multi ‑detector CT is regarded as the investiga‑ in the world. In the years from 2000 to 2009, tion of choice in patients with pancreatic cancer. the incidence rate in the United States increased The sensitivity of CT in detecting pancreatic can‑ by 0.9% per year and the death rate increased by cer is between 75% and 100% with specificity of 0.5% per year.1 The overall 5 ‑year survival rate 70% to 100%.3,4 MRI has been proved to be ef‑ reported worldwide does not exceed 5%. Even fective in the diagnosis and staging of pancreat‑ Correspondence to: dr n. med. Radoslaw Pach, I Katedra for patients with a tumor that has been surgi‑ ic cancers; therefore, it should be used in centers Chirurgii Ogólnej, Uniwersytet cally removed, the 5‑year survival is only about where these facilities are readily available. Posi‑ Jagielloński, Collegium Medicum, 20% to 25%. In 2009 in Poland, pancreatic can‑ tron emission tomography–CT is a useful com‑ ul. Kopernika 40, 31-501 Kraków, Poland, phone: +48 -12-424 -80 -07, cer was the second cause of death due to malig‑ plementary investigation to exclude metastases fax: +48 -12-424 -80 -07, nant gastrointestinal neoplasms in women and outside the abdomen. Staging laparoscopy and e -mail: [email protected] the third one in men.2 laparoscopic ultrasonography are important in Received: February 20, 2014. Revision accepted: April 1, 2014. Over the years, various radiological imaging the restaging of locally advanced lesions after neo‑ 3 Published online: April 2, 2014. modalities have been used for the diagnosis and adjuvant therapy. However, in view of wide avail‑ Conflict of interest: none declared. staging of pancreatic cancer, including abdomi‑ ability, noninvasiveness, low cost, and relatively Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014; nal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), high diagnostic accuracy, abdominal ultrasonog‑ 124 (5): 225-232 Copyright by Medycyna Praktyczna, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), laparoscopy, raphy is routinely used as the first ‑line diagnostic Kraków 2014 and endoscopic ultrasonography. modality in pancreatic cancer, and its sensitivity ORIGINAL ARTICLE Role of abdominal ultrasonography in clinical staging... 225 reaches 90%.5,6 The limitations associated with Logiq 7 (Logiq 7, General Electric, Fairfield, Con‑ abdominal ultrasound examination, such as in‑ necticut, United States), Hitachi EUB 6000, or Hi‑ sufficient experience of the operator, low quali‑ tachi EUB 550 (Hitachi, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan) ty of the ultrasound equipment, or incorrect pa‑ apparatus. All examinations were performed in tient preparation, result in divergent opinions on the morning, and all patients were fasting on its efficacy in pancreatic cancer staging. A signif‑ the day of the examination. Each examination icant advantage of this modality is its ability to was performed according to the established study detect liver metastases, which makes further im‑ protocol, including staging of pancreatic cancer. aging unnecessary. Morrin et al.7 demonstrated The T and N categories were established and ana‑ that grey ‑scale ultrasound combined with Dop‑ lyzed according to the TNM Classification of Ma‑ pler imaging has similar results to helical CT and lignant Tumors.8 The infiltration of the major ‑ab CT angiography in detecting venous involvement. dominal vessels (the aorta, celiac artery, superi‑ The aim of our study was to assess the diagnos‑ or mesenteric artery, common hepatic artery, he‑ tic accuracy of abdominal ultrasonography in stag‑ patic portal vein, superior mesenteric vein) was ing of pancreatic carcinoma in all patients who assessed with color Doppler and power Doppler underwent surgery between 2000 and 2012 in ultrasonography. The ultrasound criteria of vas‑ a tertiary care center. All examinations were per‑ cular invasion applied in this study were as fol‑ formed by surgeons experienced in abdominal lows: loss of normal hyperechogenic tissue be‑ ultrasonography and the results were compared tween the tumor and the vessel, obstruction, or with intraoperative findings. We attempted to encasement by tumor tissue over more than half establish the role of abdominal ultrasonography of the circumference of any vessel. The intraoper‑ performed by experienced diagnosticians in pa‑ ative finding of major artery infiltration, and, in tients with pancreatic cancer. most cases, also of major abdominal vein infiltra‑ tion, precluded resection. Local lymph nodes were PatientS anD MetHODS Patient selection The assessed as metastatic if they were hypoechogenic study involved 454 consecutive patients with pan‑ and the size of their short axis exceeded 10 mm. creatic cancer admitted to a tertiary referral hos‑ All examinations were conducted by surgeons pital, who underwent surgery between the years who verified their findings intraoperatively and 2000 and 2012. The inclusion criteria were as fol‑ performed more than 1000 abdominal ultraso‑ lows: pancreatic cancer confirmed preoperative‑ nographies per year. ly by fine ‑needle aspiration biopsy or core ‑needle The final staging of pancreatic carcinoma was biopsy performed intraoperatively or by histo‑ based on a histopathological examination of sur‑ logical examination of the specimen; preopera‑ gical specimen in resectable cases and on the re‑ tive abdominal ultrasonography and CT; signed sults of intraoperative surgical assessment. informed consent for diagnostic procedures and The assessment of retrieved lymph nodes was surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: dis‑ performed in patients in whom resections had tant metastases confirmed by imaging studies be‑ been performed and in some patients with unre‑ fore surgery; lack of informed consent; contrain‑ sectable tumors in whom lymph nodes had been dications for general anesthesia. collected intraoperatively for a histopathological All relevant data were collected prospective‑ study. CT was used to determine the nodal sta‑ ly using a standard electronic database (Magic2, tus when the tumor was not resected and lymph Magic Software Enterprises). The authors ana‑ nodes were not retrieved. lyzed the following variables: clinical and patho‑ In all patients, abdominal CT and chest X‑ray logical features, staging of pancreatic cancer based were required to exclude distant metastases for on preoperative abdominal ultrasonography, type clinical staging before surgery. of surgical procedures, pathomorphological stag‑ ing and staging of pancreatic carcinoma based on Surgery None of the patients received neoad‑ intraoperative findings and CT. juvant therapy prior to surgery. A Whipple or The study was performed in accordance with Traverso–Longmire procedure was used for tu‑ the ethical standards of the Declaration of Hel‑ mors located in the head of the pancreas, a dis‑ sinki and Good Clinical Practice. The approval tal pancreatectomy for those located in the body of an ethics committee was not required to con‑ or tail, and a total pancreatectomy for multifo‑ duct the present study, according to the legal sys‑ cal tumors. Regional lymph nodes were routine‑ tem in Poland. ly resected en bloc with the tumor. We did not perform vascular resection with reconstruction. Diagnostic procedures Abdominal ultrasound ex‑ In patients who had a nonresectable tumor, ex‑ aminations were performed in an outpatient clinic ploratory laparotomy or gastroenteroanastomo‑ after patients with suspicion of pancreatic cancer sis (or biliodigestive anastomosis in those with a had been consulted by a surgeon. After the ultra‑ tumor within the head of the pancreas) was per‑ sound examination, patients were scheduled for formed (TABLE 2). A bilio digestive anastomosis was CT, following which a decision on surgical
Recommended publications
  • OT Resource for K9 Overview of Surgical Procedures
    OT Resource for K9 Overview of surgical procedures Prepared by: Hannah Woolley Stage Level 1 2 Gynecology/Oncology Surgeries Lymphadenectomy (lymph node dissection) Surgical removal of lymph nodes Radical: most/all of the lymph nodes in tumour area are removed Regional: some of the lymph nodes in the tumour area are removed Omentectomy Surgical procedure to remove the omentum (thin abdominal tissue that encases the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Indications for omenectomy: Ovarian cancer Sometimes performed in combination with TAH/BSO Posterior Pelvic Exenteration Surgical removal of rectum, anus, portion of the large intestine, ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus (partial or total removal of the vagina may also be indicated) Indications for pelvic exenteration Gastrointestinal cancer (bowel, colon, rectal) Gynecological cancer (cervical, vaginal, ovarian, vulvar) Radical Cystectomy Surgical removal of the whole bladder and proximal lymph nodes In men, prostate gland is also removed In women, ovaries and uterus may also be removed Following surgery: Urostomy (directs urine through a stoma on the abdomen) Recto sigmoid pouch/Mainz II pouch (segment of the rectum and sigmoid colon used to provide anal urinary diversion) 3 Radical Vulvectomy Surgical removal of entire vulva (labia, clitoris, vestibule, introitus, urethral meatus, glands/ducts) and surrounding lymph nodes Indication for radical vulvectomy Treatment of vulvar cancer (most common) Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Exploratory procedure where the sentinel lymph node is removed and examined to determine if there is lymph node involvement in patients diagnosed with cancer (commonly breast cancer) Total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral saplingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) Surgical removal of the uterus (including cervix), both fallopian tubes and ovaries Indications for TAH/BSO: Uterine fibroids: benign growths in the muscle of the uterus Endometriosis: condition where uterine tissue grows on structures outside the uterus (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Complication Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy Based on Early Personal Experience
    Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011;15:243-247 Original Article Complication analysis of distal pancreatectomy based on early personal experience Sung-Jin Park, Hyung-Il Seo, Soo-Hee Go, Sung-Pil Yun, and Ji-Yeon Lee Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea Backgrounds/Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial personal experiences with distal pancreatectomy and perioperative risk factors, outcomes, and management of pancreatic fistulas. Methods: Between May, 2007 and May, 2010, a total of 28 patients who had undergone elective distal pancreatectomy were evaluated for this study. Perioperative factors and the occurrence of pancreatic fistula were analyzed on the basis of International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria. Results: There were sixteen cases of benign neo- plasms and twelve cases of malignant tumors. The remnant pancreas was manually sutured with ligation of the pancre- atic duct (n=14), auto-suture stapling along with manual sutures (n=12), or stapling alone (n=2). According to the ISGPF classification, morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic fistulas was 42.9% (n=12) and 0%, respectively. These pancreatic fistulae were classified as grade A in 8 cases (28.6%), grade B in 3 cases (10.7%), and grade C in one case (3.6%). All patients with pancreatic fistula were treated conservatively. Conclusions: Perioperative factors do not affect the risk of pancreatic fistula. Adequate drainage is the most effective method for management of a pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. (Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011;15:243-247) Key Words: Distal pancreatectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Complication; Leak INTRODUCTION Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Pancreatectomy Treats Chronic Pancreatitis While Preserving Endocrine Function in Preclinical Models
    Chemical pancreatectomy treats chronic pancreatitis while preserving endocrine function in preclinical models Mohamed Saleh, … , Krishna Prasadan, George Gittes J Clin Invest. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI143301. Research In-Press Preview Endocrinology Gastroenterology Chronic pancreatitis affects over 250,000 people in the US and millions worldwide. It is associated with chronic debilitating pain, pancreatic exocrine failure, high-risk of pancreatic cancer, and usually progresses to diabetes. Treatment options are limited and ineffective. We developed a new potential therapy, wherein a pancreatic ductal infusion of 1-2% acetic acid in mice and non-human primates resulted in a non-regenerative, near-complete ablation of the exocrine pancreas, with complete preservation of the islets. Pancreatic ductal infusion of acetic acid in a mouse model of chronic pancreatitis led to resolution of chronic inflammation and pancreatitis-associated pain. Furthermore, acetic acid-treated animals showed improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. The loss of exocrine tissue in this procedure would not typically require further management in patients with chronic pancreatitis because they usually have pancreatic exocrine failure requiring dietary enzyme supplements. Thus, this procedure, which should be readily translatable to humans through an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), may offer a potential innovative non-surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis that relieves pain and prevents the progression of pancreatic diabetes. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/143301/pdf Chemical pancreatectomy treats chronic pancreatitis while preserving endocrine function in preclinical models Authors: Mohamed Saleh1,2, *Kartikeya Sharma1, *Ranjeet Kalsi1, Joseph Fusco1, Anuradha Sehrawat1, Jami L. Saloman3, Ping Guo4, Ting Zhang 1, Nada Mohamed1, Yan Wang1, Krishna Prasadan1, George K.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article
    ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article - Technique 2018;31(3):e1395 DOI: /10.1590/0102-672020180001e1395 LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH SPLEEN PRESERVATION Pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica com preservação esplênica Sergio Renato PAIS-COSTA1,2, Guilherme Costa Crispim de SOUSA1,2, Sergio Luiz Melo ARAUJO1,2, Olímpia Alves Teixeira LIMA1,2 How to cite this article: Pais-Costa SR, Sousa GCC, Araujo SLM, Lima OAT. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018;31(3):e1395. DOI: /10.1590/0102-672020180001e1395 From the 1Hospital Santa Lúcia, Brasília, DF ABSTRACT - Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy has been the choice for resection and 2Hospital Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil. of distal pancreas lesions due many advantages over open approach. Spleen preservation technique seems minimizes infectious complications in long-term outcome. Aim: To present the results of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies with spleen preservation by Kimura´s technique (preservation of spleen blood vessels) performed by single surgical team. Methods: Retrospective case series aiming to evaluate both short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies with spleen preservation. Results: A total of 54 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies were performed, in which 26 were laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies with spleen preservation by Kimura´s technique. Mean age was 47.9 years-old (21-75) where 61.5% were female. Mean BMI was 28.5 kg/m² (18-38.8). Mean diameter of lesion was 4.3 cm (1.8- 7.5). Mean operative time was 144.1 min (90-200). Intraoperative bleeding was 119.2 ml (50- 600). Conversion to laparotomy 3% (n=1).
    [Show full text]
  • Once in a Lifetime Procedures Code List 2019 Effective: 11/14/2010
    Policy Name: Once in a Lifetime Procedures Once in a Lifetime Procedures Code List 2019 Effective: 11/14/2010 Family Rhinectomy Code Description 30160 Rhinectomy; total Family Laryngectomy Code Description 31360 Laryngectomy; total, without radical neck dissection 31365 Laryngectomy; total, with radical neck dissection Family Pneumonectomy Code Description 32440 Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; with resection of segment of trachea followed by 32442 broncho-tracheal anastomosis (sleeve pneumonectomy) 32445 Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; extrapleural Family Splenectomy Code Description 38100 Splenectomy; total (separate procedure) Splenectomy; total, en bloc for extensive disease, in conjunction with other procedure (List 38102 in addition to code for primary procedure) Family Glossectomy Code Description Glossectomy; complete or total, with or without tracheostomy, without radical neck 41140 dissection Glossectomy; complete or total, with or without tracheostomy, with unilateral radical neck 41145 dissection Family Uvulectomy Code Description 42140 Uvulectomy, excision of uvula Family Gastrectomy Code Description 43620 Gastrectomy, total; with esophagoenterostomy 43621 Gastrectomy, total; with Roux-en-Y reconstruction 43622 Gastrectomy, total; with formation of intestinal pouch, any type Family Colectomy Code Description 44150 Colectomy, total, abdominal, without proctectomy; with ileostomy or ileoproctostomy 44151 Colectomy, total, abdominal, without proctectomy; with continent ileostomy 44155 Colectomy,
    [Show full text]
  • Leapfrog Hospital Survey Hard Copy
    Leapfrog Hospital Survey Hard Copy QUESTIONS & REPORTING PERIODS ENDNOTES MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS FAQS Table of Contents Welcome to the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey........................................................................................... 6 Important Notes about the 2016 Survey ............................................................................................ 6 Overview of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey ................................................................................ 7 Pre-Submission Checklist .................................................................................................................. 9 Instructions for Submitting a Leapfrog Hospital Survey ................................................................... 10 Helpful Tips for Verifying Submission ......................................................................................... 11 Tips for updating or correcting a previously submitted Leapfrog Hospital Survey ...................... 11 Deadlines ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Deadlines for the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey ...................................................................... 13 Deadlines Related to the Hospital Safety Score ......................................................................... 13 Technical Assistance.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Resection of Hepatic and Rectal Metastases of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma (PACC): a Case Report
    Surgical resection of hepatic and rectal metastases of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC): a case report 著者 Ohara Yusuke, Oda Tatsuya, Enomoto Tsuyoshi, Hisakura Katsuji, Akashi Yoshimasa, Ogawa Koichi, Owada Yohei, Domoto Yu, Miyazaki Yoshihiro, Shimomura Osamu, Kurata Masanao, Ohkohchi Nobuhiro journal or World journal of surgical oncology publication title volume 16 page range 158 year 2018-08 権利 (C) The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1 .0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00153588 doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1457-8 Creative Commons : 表示 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.ja Ohara et al. World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2018) 16:158 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1457-8 CASE REPORT Open Access Surgical resection of hepatic and rectal metastases of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC): a case report Yusuke Ohara, Tatsuya Oda*, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Katsuji Hisakura, Yoshimasa Akashi, Koichi Ogawa, Yohei Owada, Yu Domoto, Yoshihiro Miyazaki, Osamu Shimomura, Masanao Kurata and Nobuhiro Ohkohchi Abstract Background: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC), a rare variant of pancreatic malignancy, is generally managed the same way as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Hand-Assisted Total Pancreatectomy: Single Institution Experience of Seven Patients
    JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2020 June 30; 21(3): 57-62. ORIGINAL ARTICLE Laparoscopic Hand-assisted Total Pancreatectomy: Single Institution Experience of Seven Patients Sujit Kulkarni1, Kaylene Barrera2, Rick Selby1, Dilipkumar Parekh1 1Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States 2SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States ABSTRACT Background In the past two decades, total pancreatectomy has been associated with improved postoperative and long-term outcomes due to the improvements in surgical technique, better enzyme preparations and diabetes control. While minimally invasive Whipple operation has enjoyed the attention in recent years, the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive total pancreatectomy is still not established. Methods A retrospective review of minimally invasive total pancreatic resections. Results Seven patients underwent laparoscopic hand- assisted total pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2011. The mean patient age was 58.1 years (58.1 ± 6.45) and the median American Society of Anesthesiologist score was 3. Three patients had diffuse IPMN, two had multiple neuroendocrine tumors and two patients had large cystic lesions in head, body and tail of pancreas. Median operative time was 431 minutes (range 348-590) with 300 cc (range the mortality was 0. Conclusion The laparoscopic hand-assisted total pancreatectomy appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. It is a150-1200) technically of demanding blood loss. procedureThe 90 days requiring postoperative expertise complication in both open rate and of advancedgrade 2 or laparoscopic higher Clavien-Dindo pancreatic classification procedures andwas additional 14% and multi-institutional studies are necessary to further evaluate its role.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of the Early and Late Postoperative Pancreatic Function and Nutritional Status: Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy
    ISSN: 2378-3397 Izumo et al. Int J Surg Res Pract 2017, 4:057 DOI: 10.23937/2378-3397/1410057 Volume 4 | Issue 3 International Journal of Open Access Surgery Research and Practice RESEARCH ARTICLE The Evaluation of the Early and Late Postoperative Pancreatic Func- tion and Nutritional Status: Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy Wataru Izumo*, Ryota Higuchi and Masakazu Yamamoto Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Japan *Corresponding author: Wataru Izumo, Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan, E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Introduction Background: Central pancreatectomy is performed to The pancreas has both exocrine and endocrine func- preserve pancreatic function in selected patients with low- tions, and plays an important role in digestion and ab- grade tumors. We evaluated short-term and long-term pan- sorption by secreting pancreatic digestive enzymes in creatic function and nutritional status after central or distal pancreatectomy. the pancreatic juice and releasing insulin into the blood. In recent years, central pancreatectomy has been per- Methods: The subjects were 24 patients undergoing central pancreatectomy and 91 patients receiving distal pancrea- formed to preserve pancreatic function in selected pa- tectomy. We retrospectively evaluated body weight, serum tients with low-grade pancreatic tumors, but its short- albumin, hemoglobin A1c, and complications. term and long-term efficacy for achieving this objective Results: After central pancreatectomy, body weight and he- has been not so clear. moglobin A1c did not change significantly up to 60 months postoperatively compared with before surgery, while serum Theoretically, pancreatic exocrine function should albumin was significantly increased at all postoperative as- be better after central pancreatectomy than after other sessments (6, 12, 36, and 60 months, all P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Ex Vivo Resection and Autotransplantation for Pancreatic Neoplasms
    Ex Vivo Resection and Autotransplantation for Pancreatic Neoplasms Peter Liou, MD, Tomoaki Kato, MD, MBA* KEYWORDS Pancreas Pancreatic tumors Ex vivo resection Autotransplantation Mesenteric root involvement SMA involvement KEY POINTS Ex vivo resection and autotransplantation is a technique derived from multivisceral and intestinal transplantation whereby tumor-infiltrated organs are removed en bloc and pre- served in the cold, followed by tumor resection and reimplantation of the remaining viscera. Advantages of ex vivo resection include tumor removal in a bloodless field while mini- mizing the risk of ischemic injury to the involved organs. Access to the mesenteric root is greatly facilitated with ex vivo resection, and allows for safe reconstruction of major vasculature while preserving visceral integrity. Certain low-grade, non-adenocarcinomatous pancreatic neoplasms involving the mesen- teric vessels where aggressive surgical resection would be warranted, may benefit from ex vivo resection. Although ex vivo resections have been performed for pancreatic adenocarcinomas with major arterial involvement, the associated morbidity is significant and benefit remains unclear. INTRODUCTION Pancreatic neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of tumors arising from the pancreas with distinct and varied clinical profiles.1 Although pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains by far the most common and deadliest of these, there are several low- grade or benign neoplasms that may benefit from aggressive, curative resection.2,3 Due to the proximity of the pancreas to major abdominal vasculature, these tumors can sometimes infiltrate these vessels and preclude complete or safe resection by conventional surgical technique. Ex vivo resection and autotransplantation, whereby Financial Disclosures: The authors have nothing to disclose. Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168 Street PH14-105, New York, NY 10032, USA * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Whipple: a Practical Approach to Nutrition Management
    NINFLAMMATORYUTRITION ISSUES BOWEL IN GASTROENTEROLO DISEASE: A PRACTICALGY, SERIES APPROACH, #108 SERIES #73 Carol Rees Parrish, M.S., R.D., Series Editor Post-Whipple: A Practical Approach to Nutrition Management Nora Decher Amy Berry The classic pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), also known as the Kausch-Whipple, and the pylorus- preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) are most commonly performed for treatment of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. This highly complex surgery disrupts the coordination of tightly orchestrated digestive processes. This, in combination with a diseased gland, sets the patient up for nutritional complications such as altered motility (gastroparesis and dumping), pancreatic insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies and bacterial overgrowth. Close monitoring and attention to these issues will help the clinician optimize nutritional status and help prevent potentially devastating complications. 63-year-old female, D.D., presented to the copper, zinc, selenium, and potentially thiamine University of Virginia Health System (UVAHS) (thiamine was repleted before serum levels were Awith weight loss and biliary obstruction. She was checked). A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with diagnosed with a large pancreatic serous cystadenoma jejunal extension (PEG-J) was placed due to intolerance and underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) of gastric enteral nutrition (EN). After several more (standard Whipple procedure with partial gastrectomy) hospitalizations, prolonged rehabilitation in a nursing with posterior anastomosis and cholecystectomy. Seven home, 7 months of supplemental nocturnal EN, and months later she was admitted to UVAHS with nausea, treatment of pancreatic insufficiency with pancreatic vomiting, diarrhea and a severe weight loss of 47lbs enzymes (with her meals and EN), D.D. was able to (33% of her usual body weight).
    [Show full text]
  • Facing Pancreatic Surgery?
    Facing Pancreatic Surgery? Learn about minimally invasive da Vinci ® Surgery The Condition: Pancreatitis/Pancreatic Cancer The pancreas is an organ that produces enzymes and hormones to help your body digest food and regulate blood sugar. The pancreas is located behind your stomach and is about 6 inches long. Pancreatitis is a disease in which the pancreas becomes inflamed. It can be acute or chronic. Acute pancreatitis occurs suddenly and usually goes away in a few days with treatment.1 Symptoms may include: pain, swelling or tenderness in the upper abdomen, nausea, vomiting, back pain, and fever. Chronic pancreatitis occurs over many years and can lead to permanent damage.1 Symptoms may include: upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and oily stool. Pancreatitis often develops between ages 30 and 40. The most common causes are: gallstones, heavy alcohol use, cystic fibrosis, high triglycerides, certain medicines, and structural problems in the pancreas. Pancreatic cancer is hard to detect in its initial stages since it often does not cause early symptoms.2 If symptoms are present, they may include: yellowing skin or eyes, pain in the abdomen and back, loss of appetite, depression and blood clots. Some risk factors include: smoking, obesity, diabetes, chronic pancreatitis, and certain hereditary disorders. Stomach Pancreas Treatment/Surgery Your doctor will suggest a treatment plan based on the severity or stage of the disease. If surgery is recommended, the type of surgery (listed below) will depend on how much of your pancreas is affected. When cancer is suspected, your surgeon will remove your pancreas and send it to a lab to be tested for cancer.
    [Show full text]