DOCSLIB.ORG

Leapfrog Hospital Survey Hard Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leapfrog Hospital Survey Hard Copy Leapfrog Hospital Survey Hard Copy QUESTIONS & REPORTING PERIODS ENDNOTES MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS FAQS Table of Contents Welcome to the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey........................................................................................... 6 Important Notes about the 2016 Survey ............................................................................................ 6 Overview of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey ................................................................................ 7 Pre-Submission Checklist .................................................................................................................. 9 Instructions for Submitting a Leapfrog Hospital Survey ................................................................... 10 Helpful Tips for Verifying Submission ......................................................................................... 11 Tips for updating or correcting a previously submitted Leapfrog Hospital Survey ...................... 11 Deadlines ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Deadlines for the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey ...................................................................... 13 Deadlines Related to the Hospital Safety Score ......................................................................... 13 Technical Assistance........................................................................................................................ 14 Help Desk .................................................................................................................................... 14 Leapfrog Survey Users Group .................................................................................................... 14 Reporting Periods ............................................................................................................................. 15 PROFILE ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 PROFILE ................................................................................................................................................. 19 Facility Information ...................................................................................................................... 19 Demographic Information ............................................................................................................ 19 Contact Information ..................................................................................................................... 20 SECTION 1: BASIC HOSPITAL INFORMATION ....................................................................................... 22 Section 1: 2016 Basic Hospital Information ............................................................................................. 23 Section 1: 2016 Basic Hospital Reference Information ........................................................................... 24 What’s New in the 2016 Survey .................................................................................................. 24 Change Summary since Release................................................................................................ 24 Page Intentionally Left Blank ...................................................................................................................... 25 SECTION 2: COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY (CPOE) ..................................................... 26 Section 2: 2016 Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) Standard .............................................. 27 Section 2: Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) Reference Information .................................. 30 What’s New in the 2016 Survey .................................................................................................. 30 Change Summary since Release................................................................................................ 30 CPOE Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) .................................................................................... 31 SECTION 3: EVIDENCE-BASED HOSPITAL REFERRAL (EBHR)........................................................... 33 Section 3: 2016 Evidence-Based Hospital Referral ................................................................................ 34 3A High-Risk Surgical Procedures Provided ................................................................................... 35 3B: Aortic Valve Replacement ......................................................................................................... 36 Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) – Volume ................................................................................ 36 2 Version 6.3 First Release: April 1, 2016 Updated Release: August 22, 2016 Table of Contents Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) – National Performance Measurement .................................. 37 Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) – Regional Registries ............................................................ 38 3C: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Repair ................................................................................ 39 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Repair – Volume ................................................................. 39 3D: Pancreatic Resections ............................................................................................................... 40 Pancreatic Resections – Volume ................................................................................................ 40 3E: Esophagectomy ......................................................................................................................... 41 Esophagectomy – Volume .......................................................................................................... 41 Section 3: 2015 Evidence-Based Hospital Referral (EBHR) Reference Information .............................. 43 What’s New in the 2016 Survey .................................................................................................. 43 Change Summary since Release................................................................................................ 43 EBHR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) .................................................................................... 44 AVR Measure References ............................................................................................................... 45 AVR Volume Standard ................................................................................................................ 45 AVR Outcomes Specifications .................................................................................................... 46 AAA Repair Measure References .................................................................................................... 47 AAA Volume Standard ................................................................................................................ 47 Pancreatectomy Measure References ............................................................................................. 48 Pancreatectomy Volume Standard ............................................................................................. 48 Esophagectomy Measure References ............................................................................................. 50 Esophagectomy Volume Standard ............................................................................................. 50 Page Intentionally Left Blank ...................................................................................................................... 51 SECTION 4: MATERNITY CARE ............................................................................................................... 52 Section 4: 2016 Maternity Care ............................................................................................................... 53 4A Maternity Care ............................................................................................................................ 54 4B: Early Elective Deliveries ............................................................................................................ 55 4C: Cesarean Section ...................................................................................................................... 56 4D: Episiotomy ................................................................................................................................. 57 4E: Process Measures of Quality ..................................................................................................... 58 4F:High-Risk Deliveries .................................................................................................................... 59 High-Risk Deliveries .................................................................................................................... 59 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit(s) – Volume .................................................................................. 60 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit(s) – National Performance Measurement .................................... 60 Process Measure of Quality – Antenatal Steroids ...................................................................... 61 Section 4: 2016 Maternity Care Reference Information .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caesarean Section Or Vaginal Delivery in the 21St Century
    CAESAREAN SECTION OR VAGINAL DELIVERY IN THE 21ST CENTURY ntil the 20th Century, caesarean fluid embolism. The absolute risk of trans-placentally to the foetus, prepar- section (C/S) was a feared op- death with C/S in high and middle- ing the foetus to adopt its mother’s Ueration. The ubiquitous classical resource settings is between 1/2000 and microbiome. C/S interferes with neonatal uterine incision meant high maternal 1/4000 (2, 3). In subsequent pregnancies, exposure to maternal vaginal and skin mortality from bleeding and future the risk of placenta previa, placenta flora, leading to colonization with other uterine rupture. Even with aseptic surgi- accreta and uterine rupture is increased. environmental microbes and an altered cal technique, sepsis was common and These conditions increase maternal microbiome. Routine antibiotic exposure lethal without antibiotics. The operation mortality and severe maternal morbid- with C/S likely alters this further. was used almost solely to save the life of ity cumulatively with each subsequent Microbial exposure and the stress of a mother in whom vaginal delivery was C/S. This is of particular importance to labour also lead to marked activation extremely dangerous, such as one with women having large families. of immune system markers in the cord placenta previa. Foetal death and the use blood of neonates born vaginally or by of intrauterine foetal destructive proce- Maternal Benefits C/S after labour. These changes are absent dures, which carry their own morbidity, C/S has a modest protective effect against in the cord blood of neonates born by were often preferable to C/S.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Management of Transcatheter Heart Valves
    Corporate Medical Policy Surgical Management of Transcatheter Heart Valves File Name: surgica l_management_of_transcatheter_heart_valves Origination: 1/2011 Last CAP Review: 6/2021 Next CAP Review: 6/2022 Last Review: 6/2021 Description of Procedure or Service As the proportion of older adults increases in the U.S. population, the incidence of degenerative heart valve disease also increases. Aortic stenosis and mitra l regurgita tion are the most common valvular disorders in adults aged 70 years and older. For patients with severe valve disease, heart valve repair or replacement involving open heart surgery can improve functional status and qua lity of life. A variety of conventional mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves are readily available. However, some individuals, due to advanced age or co-morbidities, are considered too high risk for open heart surgery. Alternatives to the open heart approach to heart valve replacement are currently being explored. Transcatheter heart valve replacement and repair are relatively new interventional procedures involving the insertion of an artificial heart valve or repair device using a catheter, rather than through open heart surgery, or surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The point of entry is typically either the femoral vein (antegrade) or femora l artery (retrograde), or directly through the myocardium via the apical region of the heart. For pulmonic and aortic valve replacement surgery, an expandable prosthetic heart valve is crimped onto a catheter and then delivered and deployed at the site of the diseased native valve. For valve repair, a small device is delivered by catheter to the mitral valve where the faulty leaflets are clipped together to reduce regurgitation.
    [Show full text]
  • OT Resource for K9 Overview of Surgical Procedures
    OT Resource for K9 Overview of surgical procedures Prepared by: Hannah Woolley Stage Level 1 2 Gynecology/Oncology Surgeries Lymphadenectomy (lymph node dissection) Surgical removal of lymph nodes Radical: most/all of the lymph nodes in tumour area are removed Regional: some of the lymph nodes in the tumour area are removed Omentectomy Surgical procedure to remove the omentum (thin abdominal tissue that encases the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Indications for omenectomy: Ovarian cancer Sometimes performed in combination with TAH/BSO Posterior Pelvic Exenteration Surgical removal of rectum, anus, portion of the large intestine, ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus (partial or total removal of the vagina may also be indicated) Indications for pelvic exenteration Gastrointestinal cancer (bowel, colon, rectal) Gynecological cancer (cervical, vaginal, ovarian, vulvar) Radical Cystectomy Surgical removal of the whole bladder and proximal lymph nodes In men, prostate gland is also removed In women, ovaries and uterus may also be removed Following surgery: Urostomy (directs urine through a stoma on the abdomen) Recto sigmoid pouch/Mainz II pouch (segment of the rectum and sigmoid colon used to provide anal urinary diversion) 3 Radical Vulvectomy Surgical removal of entire vulva (labia, clitoris, vestibule, introitus, urethral meatus, glands/ducts) and surrounding lymph nodes Indication for radical vulvectomy Treatment of vulvar cancer (most common) Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Exploratory procedure where the sentinel lymph node is removed and examined to determine if there is lymph node involvement in patients diagnosed with cancer (commonly breast cancer) Total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral saplingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) Surgical removal of the uterus (including cervix), both fallopian tubes and ovaries Indications for TAH/BSO: Uterine fibroids: benign growths in the muscle of the uterus Endometriosis: condition where uterine tissue grows on structures outside the uterus (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 1063 Relation Between Vaginal Hiatus and Perineal Body
    1063 Campanholi V1, Sanches M1, Zanetti M R D1, Alexandre S1, Resende A P M1, Petricelli C D1, Nakamura M U1 1. Unifesp- Brasil RELATION BETWEEN VAGINAL HIATUS AND PERINEAL BODY LENGTHS WITH EPISIOTOMY IN VAGINAL DELIVERY Hypothesis / aims of study The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between vaginal hiatus and perineal body lengths with the occurrence of episiotomy during vaginal delivery. Study design, materials and methods It´s a cross-sectional observational study with a consecutive sample of 60 parturients, made from July 2009 to March 2010 in the Obstetric Center at University Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Inclusion criteria were parturients at term (37 to 42 weeks gestation) in the first stage of labour, with less than 9 cm dilatation, with a single fetus in cephalic presentation and good vitality confirmed by cardiotocography. Exclusion criteria were parturients submitted to cesarean section or forceps delivery. The patients were evaluated in the lithotomic position. The measurement was performed in the first stage of labour, by the same examiner using a metric measuring tape previously cleaned with alcohol 70% and discarded after each use. The vaginal hiatus length (distance between the external urethral meatus and the vulvar fourchette) and the perineal body (distance between the vulvar fourchette and the center of the anal orifice) were evaluated. For statistical analysis the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 17® was used, applying Mann-Whitney Test and Spearman Rank Correlation Test to determine the importance of vaginal hiatus and perineal body length in the occurrence of episiotomy, with p<0.05.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Valve Replacement Procedure
    Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Valve Replacement Procedure A Guide for Patients and their Families If you’ve been diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis, you probably have a lot of questions and concerns. The information in this booklet will help you learn more about your heart, severe aortic stenosis, and treatment options. Your heart team will recommend which treatment option is best for you. Please talk with them about any questions you have. Table of Contents 4 About Your Heart 5 What Is Severe Aortic Stenosis? 5 What Causes Severe Aortic Stenosis? 7 What Are the Symptoms of Severe Aortic Stenosis? 8 Treatment Options for Severe Aortic Stenosis 10 Before a TAVR Procedure 12 What Are the Risks of TAVR? 2 3 About Your Heart What Is Severe See the difference between healthy and The heart is a muscle about the size of your fist. It is a pump that works nonstop to Aortic Stenosis? diseased valves send oxygen-rich blood throughout your entire body. The heart is made up of four The aortic valve is made up of two or three chambers and four valves. The contractions (heartbeats) of the four chambers push Healthy Valve the blood through the valves and out to your body. tissue flaps, called leaflets. Healthy valves open at every heart contraction, allowing blood to flow forward to the next chamber, and then close tightly to prevent blood from backing Pulmonic controls the flow of Aortic controls the flow of blood up. Blood flows in one direction only. This is Valve blood to the lungs Valve out of your heart to the important for a healthy heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Preservation of Gastric Tube Blood
    CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 5 (2014) 746–749 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Surgery Case Reports j ournal homepage: www.casereports.com Pancreaticoduodenectomy with preservation of gastric tube blood flow after esophagectomy: Report of a case ∗ Sho Okimoto, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi , Shintaro Kuroda, Hiroyuki Tahara, Masahiro Ohira, Kentaro Ide, Kohei Ishiyama, Hirotaka Tashiro, Hideki Ohdan Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 734-8551, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan a r a t b i c l e i n f o s t r a c t Article history: INTRODUCTION: During pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) is commonly Received 10 July 2014 divided. In this study, we described the clinical features of PD in which the GDA was preserved in order Received in revised form 5 August 2014 to avoid gastric tube ischemia in a patient who had previously undergone esophagectomy. Accepted 7 August 2014 PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 70-year-old man had previously undergone esophagectomy. Esophagectomy Available online 28 August 2014 and gastric tube reconstruction were performed 10 years earlier due to superior thoracic esophageal can- cer. The patient was referred to our hospital for the treatment of obstructive jaundice and was diagnosed Keywords: with middle bile duct cancer. We performed PD and preserved the GDA. The postoperative course was Bile duct cancer Pancreaticoduodenectomy uneventful, and the gastric tube continued functioning well. DISCUSSION: In a patient with a prior esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction, the blood flow to Gastroduodenal artery Esophagectomy the gastric tube is supplied only by the GDA via the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA).
    [Show full text]
  • Complication Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy Based on Early Personal Experience
    Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011;15:243-247 Original Article Complication analysis of distal pancreatectomy based on early personal experience Sung-Jin Park, Hyung-Il Seo, Soo-Hee Go, Sung-Pil Yun, and Ji-Yeon Lee Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea Backgrounds/Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial personal experiences with distal pancreatectomy and perioperative risk factors, outcomes, and management of pancreatic fistulas. Methods: Between May, 2007 and May, 2010, a total of 28 patients who had undergone elective distal pancreatectomy were evaluated for this study. Perioperative factors and the occurrence of pancreatic fistula were analyzed on the basis of International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria. Results: There were sixteen cases of benign neo- plasms and twelve cases of malignant tumors. The remnant pancreas was manually sutured with ligation of the pancre- atic duct (n=14), auto-suture stapling along with manual sutures (n=12), or stapling alone (n=2). According to the ISGPF classification, morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic fistulas was 42.9% (n=12) and 0%, respectively. These pancreatic fistulae were classified as grade A in 8 cases (28.6%), grade B in 3 cases (10.7%), and grade C in one case (3.6%). All patients with pancreatic fistula were treated conservatively. Conclusions: Perioperative factors do not affect the risk of pancreatic fistula. Adequate drainage is the most effective method for management of a pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. (Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011;15:243-247) Key Words: Distal pancreatectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Complication; Leak INTRODUCTION Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF).
    [Show full text]
  • Delivery Mode for Prolonged, Obstructed Labour Resulting in Obstetric Fistula: a Etrr Ospective Review of 4396 Women in East and Central Africa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eCommons@AKU eCommons@AKU Obstetrics and Gynaecology, East Africa Medical College, East Africa 12-17-2019 Delivery mode for prolonged, obstructed labour resulting in obstetric fistula: a etrr ospective review of 4396 women in East and Central Africa C. J. Ngongo T. J. Raassen L. Lombard J van Roosmalen S. Weyers See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.aku.edu/eastafrica_fhs_mc_obstet_gynaecol Part of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Commons Authors C. J. Ngongo, T. J. Raassen, L. Lombard, J van Roosmalen, S. Weyers, and Marleen Temmerman DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16047 www.bjog.org Delivery mode for prolonged, obstructed labour resulting in obstetric fistula: a retrospective review of 4396 women in East and Central Africa CJ Ngongo,a TJIP Raassen,b L Lombard,c J van Roosmalen,d,e S Weyers,f M Temmermang,h a RTI International, Seattle, WA, USA b Nairobi, Kenya c Cape Town, South Africa d Athena Institute VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands e Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands f Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium g Centre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya h Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Correspondence: CJ Ngongo, RTI International, 119 S Main Street, Suite 220, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Email: [email protected] Accepted 3 December 2019. Objective To evaluate the mode of delivery and stillbirth rates increase occurred at the expense of assisted vaginal delivery over time among women with obstetric fistula.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy: Thoracic Stage in Prone Position
    DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912017005002 Original Article Thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy: thoracic stage in prone position Esofagectomia vídeo-tóraco-laparoscópica com tempo torácico em posição pronada CARLOS BERNARDO COLA, TCBC-RJ1,2, FLÁVIO DUARTE SABINO, TCBC-RJ1, CARLOS EDUARDO PINTO, TCBC-RJ1, MARIA RIBEIRO MORARD, TCBC-RJ2, PEDRO PORTARI FILHO, TCBC-RJ2, TEREZA GUEDES1. ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the National Cancer Institute Abdominopelvic Division (INCA / MS/HC I) initial experience with thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with thoracic stage in prone position. Methods: we studied 19 consecutive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomies from may 2012 to august 2014, including ten patients with squamous cells carcinoma (five of the middle third and five of the lower third) and nine cases of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (six Siewert I and three Siewert II). All procedures were initiated by the prone thoracic stage. Results: There were minimal blood loss, optimal mediastinal visualization, oncological radicality and no conversions. Surgical morbidity was 42 %, most being minor complications (58% Clavien I or II), with few related to the technique. The most common complica- tion was cervical anastomotic leak (37%), with a low anastomotic stricture rate (two stenosis: 10.53%). We had one (5.3%) surgical related death, due to a gastric tube`s mediastinal leak, treated by open reoperation and neck diversion. The median Intensive Care Unit stay and hospital stay were two and 12 days, respectively. The mean thoracoscopic stage duration was 77 min. Thirteen patients received neoadju- vant treatment (five squamous cells carcinoma and eight gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas). The average lymph node sample had 16.4 lymph nodes per patient and 22.67 when separately analyzing patients without neoadjuvant treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Pancreatectomy Treats Chronic Pancreatitis While Preserving Endocrine Function in Preclinical Models
    Chemical pancreatectomy treats chronic pancreatitis while preserving endocrine function in preclinical models Mohamed Saleh, … , Krishna Prasadan, George Gittes J Clin Invest. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI143301. Research In-Press Preview Endocrinology Gastroenterology Chronic pancreatitis affects over 250,000 people in the US and millions worldwide. It is associated with chronic debilitating pain, pancreatic exocrine failure, high-risk of pancreatic cancer, and usually progresses to diabetes. Treatment options are limited and ineffective. We developed a new potential therapy, wherein a pancreatic ductal infusion of 1-2% acetic acid in mice and non-human primates resulted in a non-regenerative, near-complete ablation of the exocrine pancreas, with complete preservation of the islets. Pancreatic ductal infusion of acetic acid in a mouse model of chronic pancreatitis led to resolution of chronic inflammation and pancreatitis-associated pain. Furthermore, acetic acid-treated animals showed improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. The loss of exocrine tissue in this procedure would not typically require further management in patients with chronic pancreatitis because they usually have pancreatic exocrine failure requiring dietary enzyme supplements. Thus, this procedure, which should be readily translatable to humans through an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), may offer a potential innovative non-surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis that relieves pain and prevents the progression of pancreatic diabetes. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/143301/pdf Chemical pancreatectomy treats chronic pancreatitis while preserving endocrine function in preclinical models Authors: Mohamed Saleh1,2, *Kartikeya Sharma1, *Ranjeet Kalsi1, Joseph Fusco1, Anuradha Sehrawat1, Jami L. Saloman3, Ping Guo4, Ting Zhang 1, Nada Mohamed1, Yan Wang1, Krishna Prasadan1, George K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Obstetrical Coding Production of This Document Is Made Possible by Financial Contributions from Health Canada and Provincial and Territorial Governments
    ICD-10-CA | CCI A Guide to Obstetrical Coding Production of this document is made possible by financial contributions from Health Canada and provincial and territorial governments. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada or any provincial or territorial government. Unless otherwise indicated, this product uses data provided by Canada’s provinces and territories. All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be reproduced unaltered, in whole or in part and by any means, solely for non-commercial purposes, provided that the Canadian Institute for Health Information is properly and fully acknowledged as the copyright owner. Any reproduction or use of this publication or its contents for any commercial purpose requires the prior written authorization of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Reproduction or use that suggests endorsement by, or affiliation with, the Canadian Institute for Health Information is prohibited. For permission or information, please contact CIHI: Canadian Institute for Health Information 495 Richmond Road, Suite 600 Ottawa, Ontario K2A 4H6 Phone: 613-241-7860 Fax: 613-241-8120 www.cihi.ca [email protected] © 2018 Canadian Institute for Health Information Cette publication est aussi disponible en français sous le titre Guide de codification des données en obstétrique. Table of contents About CIHI ................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surgery for Acquired Heart Disease
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you byCORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE EARLY RESULTS WITH PARTIAL LEFT VENTRICULECTOMY Patrick M. McCarthy, MD a Objective: We sought to determine the role of partial left ventriculectomy in Randall C. Starling, MD b patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods: Since May 1996 we have James Wong, MBBS, PhD b performed partial left ventriculectomy in 53 patients, primarily (94%) in Gregory M. Scalia, MBBS b heart transplant candidates. The mean age of the patients was 53 years Tiffany Buda, RN a Rita L. Vargo, MSN, RN a (range 17 to 72 years); 60% were in class IV and 40% in class III. Marlene Goormastic, MPH c Preoperatively, 51 patients were thought to have idiopathic dilated cardio- James D. Thomas, MD b myopathy, one familial cardiomyopathy, and one valvular cardiomyopathy. Nicholas G. Smedira, MD a As our experience accrued we increased the extent of left ventriculectomy James B. Young, MD b and more complex mitral valve repairs. For two patients mitral valve replacement was performed. For 51 patients the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets were approximated (Alfieri repair); 47 patients also had ring posterior annuloplasty. In 27 patients (5!%) one or both papillary muscles were divided, additional left ventricular wall was resected, and the papillary muscle heads were reimplanted. Results: Echocardiography showed a significant decrease in left ventricular dimensions after resection (8.3 cm to 5.8 cm), reduction in mitral regurgitation (2.8+ to 0), and increase in forward ejection fraction (15.7% to 32.7%).
    [Show full text]