I T S Ch Pt R…

Credit: NMML I ts chptr… Thus far we have focussed in this book on the developments within the country and on domestic challenges. We now turn to the external challenges. Here too our leaders faced the challenge with an innovative response by way of the policy of non-alignment. But they also found themselves in conflict with neighbours. This led to three wars in 1962, Nehru with Nkrumah 1965 and 1971. These wars, and the external relations in general, were from Ghana, Nasser shaped by and had their impact on the politics in the country. from Egypt, Sukarno from Indonesia and In this chapter we study the story of this relationship between the Tito from Yugoslavia external and the internal politics by focussing on at a meeting of non- aligned nations, New • the international context that shaped India’s external relations; York, October 1960. • the operational principles that informed the country’s foreign These five comprised the policy; core leadership of the Non-Aligned Movement • the history of India’s relations with China and Pakistan; and (NAM). • the evolution of India’s nuclear policy. 2018-19 india’s external relations 4 chapter Itrnin ct India was born in a very trying and challenging international context. The world had witnessed a devastating war and was grappling with issues of reconstruction; yet another attempt to establish an international body was underway; many new countries were emerging as a result of the collapse of colonialism; and most new nations were trying to come to terms with the twin challenges of welfare and democracy. Free India’s foreign policy reflected all these concerns in the period immediately after Independence. Apart from these factors at the global level, India had its own share of concerns. The British government left behind the legacy of many international disputes; Partition created its own pressures, and the task of poverty alleviation was already waiting for fulfilment. This was the overall context in which India started participating in the world affairs as an independent nation-state. Wh! d"# $ndpndnc% c&'ﬆ ) ? As a nation born in the backdrop of the world war, India decided I! c&'ﬆ s *+ndmt,ly to conduct its foreign relations with an aim to respect the sovereignty of all other nations and to achieve security through the maintenance n- b.&'c,ly ) *rig/ of peace. This aim finds an echo in the Directive Principles of State 01lis. 3 ! 's t4% t# ! Policy. “) $ndpndnc%. A, 1,5% 's “ Just as both internal and external factors guide the behaviour of an l"c +tn6my. Onc% *rig/ individual or a family, both domestic and international environment 01lis g7 +! ) 8+r influence the foreign policy of a nation. The developing countries hn9s $t7 t4% chrg% ) lack the required resources to effectively advocate their concerns in 56m1:ody 1,5%, t7 th! ! the international system. So they pursue more modest goals than n- $/ th! <e.&+r% 8= r% the advanced states. They focus more on peace and development in >@ $ndpnd!. their own neighbourhood. Moreover, their economic and security dependence on the more powerful states occasionally influences their foreign policy. In the period immediately after the Second World Jawaharlal Nehru War, many developing nations chose to support the foreign policy during a debate in the preferences of the powerful countries who were giving them aid or Constituent Assembly in credits. This resulted in the division of countries of the world into two March 1949. clear camps. One was under the influence of the United States and its western allies and the other was under the influence of the then Soviet Union. You have read about this in the book on Contemporary World Politics. You have read there about the experiment called the Non-Aligned Movement. As you also read there, the end of the Cold War changed the context of international relations entirely. But when India achieved its freedom and started framing its foreign policy, the 2018-19 66 P!"#$%&s #' In(i) *#nc+ Ind,p,nd,nc+ The Constitutional principles Article 51 of the Indian Constitution lays down some Directive Principles of State Policy on ‘Promotion of international peace and security’. “The State shall endeavour to – (a) Promote international peace and security (b) Maintain just and honourable relations between nations (c) Foster respect for international law and treaty obligations in the dealings of organised people with one another; and (d) Encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.” How well did the Indian state live up to these principles in the first two decades after Independence? You may come back to this question after reading the chapter. Cold War was just beginning and the world was getting divided into these two camps. Did India belong to any of these two camps in global politics of the fifties and the sixties? Was it successful in conducting its foreign policy peacefully and avoiding international conflicts? - + P!"%cy . /0'-2"ig3m,34 The Indian national movement was not an isolated process. It was a part of the worldwide struggle against colonialism and imperialism. It influenced the liberation movements of many Asian and African countries. Prior to India’s Independence, there were contacts between the nationalist leaders of India and those of other colonies, united as they were in their common struggle against colonialism and imperialism. The creation of the Indian National Army (INA) by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose during the Second World War was the clearest manifestation of the linkages established between India and overseas Indians during the freedom struggle. The foreign policy of a nation reflects the interplay of domestic and external factors. Therefore, the noble ideals that inspired India’s struggle for freedom influenced the making of its foreign policy. But India’s attainment of independence coincided with the beginning of the Cold War era. As you read in the first chapter of the book, Contemporary World Politics, this period was marked by the political, It’s the fourth economic, and military confrontation at the global level between the chapter and it’s Nehru two blocs led by the superpowers, the US and the USSR. The same once again! Was he a period also witnessed developments like the establishment of the superman or what? UN, the creation of nuclear weapons, the emergence of Communist Or has his role been glorified? 2018-19 Ini’s rn lis 67 China, and the beginning of decolonisation. So India’s leadership had to pursue its national interests within the prevailing international context. Nehru’s role The first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru played a crucial role in setting the national agenda. He was his own foreign minister. Thus both as the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister, he exercised profound influence in the formulation and implementation of India’s foreign policy from 1946 to 1964. The three major objectives of Nehru’s foreign policy were to preserve the hard-earned sovereignty, protect territorial integrity, and promote rapid economic development. Nehru wished to achieve these objectives through the strategy of non- alignment. There were, of course, parties and groups in the country that believed that India should be more friendly with the bloc led by the US because that bloc claimed to be pro-democracy. Among those who thought on these lines were leaders like Dr Ambedkar. Some O!r gnr political parties, which were opposed to communism, also wanted "#$%cy %s t& v(i) India to follow a pro-US foreign policy. These included the Bharatiya tnglm* +, "wr Jan Sangh and later the Swatantra Party. But Nehru possessed "#$+%-s n) ./ t& 0(+, considerable leeway in formulating foreign policy. ny gr!1 2 "wrs 3s “ag+4* ny / 5r gr!1. Distance from two camps 9 : w& lea+ng gr!;s The foreign policy of independent India vigorously pursued the dream today r: t5: R!< i, of a peaceful world by advocating the policy of non-alignment, by =l>? n) t5: Angl&- reducing Cold War tensions and by contributing human resources to Amr%c, =l>?. W: B!4* the UN peacekeeping operations. You might ask why India did not join C: D inly t& b/ E n) either of the two camps during the Cold War era. India wanted to keep away from the military alliances led by US and Soviet Union against FG ./ 0(+, +t5r. B/ E each other. As you read in the book, Contemporary World Politics, Amr%c n) R!< i during the Cold War, the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation r: rar+nJ+ly (NATO) and the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact came into existence. India 4!sK%ci!s 2 eacE / 5r advocated non-alignment as the ideal foreign policy approach. This 3s L$ 3s 2 / 5r “ was a difficult balancing act and sometimes the balance did not appear c!JiM . 9 %s NkM perfect. In 1956 when Britain attacked Egypt over the Suez Canal !r PtE +ﬃ c!$* issue, India led the world protest against this neo-colonial invasion. But in the same year when the USSR invaded Hungary, India did not n) L: Nay L$ C: join its public condemnation. Despite such a situation, by and large 4!4peS e) by eacE 2 India did take an independent stand on various international issues le+ng tTrUs t5: and could get aid and assistance from members of both the blocs. / 5r. 9 %s cn/ C: While India was trying to convince the other developing countries 5$pe). about the policy of non-alignment, Pakistan joined the US-led military alliances. The US was not happy about India’s independent initiatives Jawaharlal Nehru Letter to K .P. S. and the policy of non-alignment.

Load more