84 – Mosque of Selim II (3 Images) Edirne, Turkey. Sinan (Architect)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

84 – Mosque of Selim II (3 images) Edirne, Turkey. Sinan (architect). 1568-1575 C.E. Brick and stone commissioned by Sultan Selim II Ottoman Innovation: organization of its interior Sinan: masterpiece and is one of the highest achievements of Islamic architecture , lifelong search for a unified interior space Center of a külliye (complex of a hospital, school, library and/or baths around a mosque) which comprises a medrese (Islamic academy teaches both Islamic and scientific lessons), a dar-ül hadis (Al-Hadith school), a timekeeper's room and an arasta (row of shops) huge encompassing dome (31.25m diameter possible to see the mihrab (direction – Quibla wall – that is faced – toward Mecca- while praying) from any location within the mosque purpose of centralizing the city (Emperor) one inspiration: he saw a connection between the wish of the central dome and the centralizing political and economic changes made by the empire o alternately: inspired by Hagia Sophia four identical minarets were planted at each corner of the marble forecourt to enforce attention on the surrounded central dome o The four vertically fluted symmetrical minarets amplify the upward thrust, shooting towards the sky like rockets from each corner of the mosque It was believed that the circular architecture was to affirm the oneness in humanity and called out the simple ideology of circle of life The visible and invisible symmetries that were called out from the exterior and interior of the mosque was to evokes God’s perfection through the plain and powerful structure of the dome and the bare stone . it amazed the public with the extravagant symmetrical exterior Interior: With the monumental exteriors proclaiming the wealth and power of the Ottoman Empire, the plain symmetrical interiors reminded the sultans should always provide a humble and faithful heart in order to connect and communicate with God o the insignificance of human o it also astonished the people with the plain symmetrical interior for it had summarized all Ottoman architectural thinking in one simple pure form .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
[Show full text]
Talaat Pasha's Report on the Armenian Genocide.Fm
Gomidas Institute Studies Series TALAAT PASHA’S REPORT ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE by Ara Sarafian Gomidas Institute London This work originally appeared as Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1917. It has been revised with some changes, including a new title. Published by Taderon Press by arrangement with the Gomidas Institute. © 2011 Ara Sarafian. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-1-903656-66-2 Gomidas Institute 42 Blythe Rd. London W14 0HA United Kingdom Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction by Ara Sarafian 5 Map 18 TALAAT PASHA’S 1917 REPORT Opening Summary Page: Data and Calculations 20 WESTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 22 Constantinople 23 Edirne vilayet 24 Chatalja mutasarriflik 25 Izmit mutasarriflik 26 Hudavendigar (Bursa) vilayet 27 Karesi mutasarriflik 28 Kala-i Sultaniye (Chanakkale) mutasarriflik 29 Eskishehir vilayet 30 Aydin vilayet 31 Kutahya mutasarriflik 32 Afyon Karahisar mutasarriflik 33 Konia vilayet 34 Menteshe mutasarriflik 35 Teke (Antalya) mutasarriflik 36 CENTRAL PROVINCES (MAP) 37 Ankara (Angora) vilayet 38 Bolu mutasarriflik 39 Kastamonu vilayet 40 Janik (Samsun) mutasarriflik 41 Nigde mutasarriflik 42 Kayseri mutasarriflik 43 Adana vilayet 44 Ichil mutasarriflik 45 EASTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 46 Sivas vilayet 47 Erzerum vilayet 48 Bitlis vilayet 49 4 Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide Van vilayet 50 Trebizond vilayet 51 Mamuretulaziz (Elazig) vilayet 52 SOUTH EASTERN PROVINCES AND RESETTLEMENT ZONE (MAP) 53 Marash mutasarriflik 54 Aleppo (Halep) vilayet 55 Urfa mutasarriflik 56 Diyarbekir vilayet
[Show full text]
Edirne, Tekirdağ, Kırklareli Için Bütünleşik Kıyı Alanları Yönetim Planı
Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse edilmektedir. STRATEJİK ÇEVRESEL DEĞERLENDİRME YÖNETMELİĞİ’NİN UYGULANMASININ DESTEKLENMESİ PROJESİ Sözleşme No: TR2018 ESOP MI A3 12/CNP/03 Edirne, Tekirdağ, Kırklareli için Bütünleşik Kıyı Alanları Yönetim Planı KAPSAM BELİRLEME RAPORU -NİHAİ- NİSAN, 2020 Stratejik Çevresel Değerlendirme (SÇD) Yönetmeliği’nin Uygulanmasının Desteklenmesi Projesi TR2018 ESOP MI A3 12/CNP/03 Bu yayının içeriği yalnızca Eptisa Mühendislik liderliğindeki Konsorsiyumun sorumluluğundadır ve hiçbir şekilde Avrupa Birliği’nin görüşlerini yansıtmaz. Kapsam Belirleme Raporu – Bütünleşik Kıyı Alanları Yönetim Planı ii Stratejik Çevresel Değerlendirme (SÇD) Yönetmeliği’nin Uygulanmasının Desteklenmesi Projesi TR2018 ESOP MI A3 12/CNP/03 BELGE KONTROL ÇİZELGESİ Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Avrupa Birliği ve Dış İlişkiler Genel Sözleşme Makamı Müdürlüğü Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevresel Etki Değerlendirmesi, İzin ve Faydalanıcı Denetim Genel Müdürlüğü Proje Stratejik Çevresel Değerlendirme (SÇD) Yönetmeliği'nin Uygulanmasının Desteklenmesi Projesi EuropeAid No TR2018 ESOP MI A3 12/CNP/03 Başlık Kapsam Belirleme Raporu - Edirne, Tekirdağ, Kırklareli için Bütünleşik Kıyı Alanları Yönetim Planı Teslim Nihai - 29.04.2020 Hazırlayanlar Kontrol Eden Nihai İsim-Soyisim İsim-Soyisim Tarih Michal MUSIL 29.04.2020 Kıdemli Uluslararası SÇD Uzmanı Pınar Yılmaz Kıdemli Yerel SÇD Uzmanı Martin SMUTNY Buse Nur Hayta Takım Lideri Teknik Destek / Çevre Mühendisi Emre MELEK Kıdemli İnşaat Mühendisi / Kıyı ve
[Show full text]
1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
[Show full text]
Introduction Suraiya N
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-62094-9 - The Cambridge History of Turkey: The Ottoman Empire as a World Power, 1453–1603: Volume 2 Edited by Suraiya N. Faroqhi and Kate Fleet Excerpt More information 1 Introduction Suraiya N. Faroqhi Of the Ottoman Empire we can say what Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) once wrote about the seventeenth-century military commander and entrepreneur Albrecht von Wallenstein (in Czech, Albrecht Václav Eusebius z Valdštejna, 1583–1634). According to Schiller’s verse, the favour and hate of [conflict- ing] parties had caused confusion, producing a highly variable image of Wallenstein’s character in history. Put differently, it was the diverging per- spectives of the beholders that gave rise to this instability. Admittedly, being a poet, Schiller made his point far more concisely than the present author is able to do.1 In certain traditions of historiography in the Balkans and elsewhere as well, denigrating the Ottoman Empire and making it responsible for all man- ner of “backwardness” is still widespread, although challenges to this view have been mounting during the last 30 years. On the other hand, romanti- cising the images of Mehmed the Conqueror (r. 1451–81) or Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66) is also quite a popular enterprise: witness the statue of Mehmed II in downtown Istanbul – a new one is in the planning stage – and the double monument to Zrínyi Miklós and Sultan Süleyman in a park of Szigetvar, Hungary. To claim “objectivity” means to deceive oneself and others, but the authors of the present volume, whatever their views, have all clearly tried to distin- guish the points made by the primary sources from the interpretations that they propose as historians of the twenty-first century.
[Show full text]
Water Pollution Studies in the Rivers of the Edirne Region–Turkey M
Water pollution studies in the rivers of the Edirne Region–Turkey M. Serdal Sakcali,1 Ruya Yilmaz,2 Salih Gucel,3∗ Celal Yarci,4 and Munir Ozturk5 1Fatih University, Faculty of Science & Arts, Buyukcekmece, Istanbul, Turkey 2Trakya University, Faculty of Agriculture, Tekirdagı,˘ Turkey 3Near East University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus 4Marmara University, Faculty of Science & Arts, Goztepe, Istanbul, Turkey 5Ege University, Botany Department, Bornova–35100, Izmir, Turkey ∗Corresponding author: [email protected] Physico-chemical parameters of Tunca, Merich, Arda and Ergene rivers, in the Edirne region of Turkey, were investigated. Studies were carried out during 1998–2004 and the data obtained were compared with EU threshold levels. The results showed that the total concentrations of P, Pb, Cu, Ni, Mn and Co were higher than these threshold levels. There is an urgent need for Turkey to limit water pollution from a wide range of dangerous substances, particularly at a time when it is being considered as an EU candidate. Turkey will be required to achieve a satisfactory status in its waters by 2015, in particular in the waters of the rivers investigated in this paper that border Bulgaria and Greece. Levels of pollutants which pose a signiﬁcant risk to the aquatic environment need to be monitored and strictly controlled. Keywords: Tunca, Merich, Arda, Ergene, physico-chemical, trace metals Introduction they contain trace elements in concentrations above acceptable limits (Sawidis et al., 1995; Zhulidov, The excessive use of natural resources and ef- 1996; Shine et al., 1998; Yevseev and Krasovskaia, ﬂuents resulting from human activity are damag- 2001). One of the states in Turkey facing this sit- ing aquatic habitats.
[Show full text]
Why Do Some Localities in Turkey Remain Resistant to Islamist Political Mobilization? Evren Celik Wiltse South Dakota State University, [email protected]
South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange History, Political Science, Philosophy, and Religion Department of History, Political Science, Faculty Publications Philosophy, and Religion 9-2017 Explaining the Dog That Does Not Bark: Why do Some Localities in Turkey Remain Resistant to Islamist Political Mobilization? Evren Celik Wiltse South Dakota State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/hppr_pubs Part of the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wiltse, E.C. 2017. Explaining the dog that doesn’t bark: Why do some localities in Turkey remain resistant to Islamist political mobilization”, to be published by George Washington University, POMEPS Studies #27 Islamists & Local Politics https://pomeps.org/category/pomeps-publications/pomeps-studies/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History, Political Science, Philosophy, and Religion at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in History, Political Science, Philosophy, and Religion Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Explaining the dog that does not bark: Why do some localities in Turkey remain resistant to Islamist political mobilization? Evren Celik Wiltse, South Dakota State University Introduction: (White, 2013; Tugal, 2015) focus on the periphery of the largest metropolis, Istanbul – Umraniye and Sultanbeyli Most studies on political Islam in Turkey have embraced respectively .
[Show full text]
Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration
Sultan Ahmed III’s calligraphy of the Basmala: “In the Name of God, the All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate” The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration In this work, words in Ottoman Turkish, including the Turkish names of people and their written works, as well as place-names within the boundaries of present-day Turkey, have been transcribed according to official Turkish orthography. Accordingly, c is read as j, ç is ch, and ş is sh. The ğ is silent, but it lengthens the preceding vowel. I is pronounced like the “o” in “atom,” and ö is the same as the German letter in Köln or the French “eu” as in “peu.” Finally, ü is the same as the German letter in Düsseldorf or the French “u” in “lune.” The anglicized forms, however, are used for some well-known Turkish words, such as Turcoman, Seljuk, vizier, sheikh, and pasha as well as place-names, such as Anatolia, Gallipoli, and Rumelia. The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne SALİH GÜLEN Translated by EMRAH ŞAHİN Copyright © 2010 by Blue Dome Press Originally published in Turkish as Tahtın Kudretli Misafirleri: Osmanlı Padişahları 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Published by Blue Dome Press 535 Fifth Avenue, 6th Fl New York, NY, 10017 www.bluedomepress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Available ISBN 978-1-935295-04-4 Front cover: An 1867 painting of the Ottoman sultans from Osman Gazi to Sultan Abdülaziz by Stanislaw Chlebowski Front flap: Rosewater flask, encrusted with precious stones Title page: Ottoman Coat of Arms Back flap: Sultan Mehmed IV’s edict on the land grants that were deeded to the mosque erected by the Mother Sultan in Bahçekapı, Istanbul (Bottom: 16th century Ottoman parade helmet, encrusted with gems).
[Show full text]
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk [[file:MustafaKemalAtaturk.jpg alt=]] President Atatürk 1st President of Turkey In office 29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 12 days) Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Succeeded by İsmet İnönü 1st Prime Minister of Turkey In office 3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921 (0 years, 266 days) Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak 1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey In office 24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923 (3 years, 219 days) Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar 1st Leader of the Republican People's Party In office 9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 62 days) Succeeded by İsmet İnönü Personal details Born 19 May 1881 (Conventional. This date was adopted by the president himself for official purposes in the absence of precise knowledge concerning the real date.)Salonica, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece) Died 10 November 1938 (aged 57)Dolmabahçe Palace Istanbul, Turkey Resting place Anıtkabir Ankara, Turkey Nationality Turkish Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party Spouse(s) Lâtife Uşaklıgil (1923–25) Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views. Signature Military service Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2 Allegiance Ottoman Empire (1893 – 8 July 1919) Republic of Turkey (9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927) Army Service/branch Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha) Republic of Turkey: Mareşal (Marshal) Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the
[Show full text]
'The Magnificent' & His Legacies
Suleiman I: ‘The Magnificent’ & His Legacies (part 1) Suleiman I: the “Magnificent” (1520-1566) … the “Magnificent” [From Tughra of Suleiman the Magnificent (additional readings) ] … “the Magnificent” - Tughra reflective of Suleiman’s wealth, power - “Suleiman shah ibn Selim shah khan al- muzzafar al-Daiman” : “Suleiman Shah son of Khan Selim, ever (the) victorious” - History reflected in use of ‘Khan’ for his father (‘khan’ from Mongol ‘leader’) - And ‘Shah’ for himself (Persian title ‘ruler’) … “the Magnificent” Like all Sultans, Suleiman struck his own coins. These are dated 1520; they carry the date of his inauguration. [from ‘Suleiman I http://members.aol.com/dkaplan888/sule.htm] … “the Magnificent” Suleimaniye Mosque: Testimony to “Magnificence” … “the Magnificent” Suleimaniye epitomized essence of Islam’s role in 16th century state: - Centre of education - medical training - religious scholarship - attached kitchen fed community, poor Recognized power of the Sultan (number of minarets), no subsequent buildings could obscure view of Mosque … “the Magnificent” Contemporary View of Mosque (from perspective of Golden Horn) … “the Magnificent” The Suleimaniye (looking down to Golden Horn): school with classrooms, ‘dormitory’ and courtyard to left … “the Magnificent” Architect Mimar Sinan: - born to simple stoneworker’s family - ‘enlisted’ into Janissary corps [note change in how one ‘became’ janissary] - trained as carpenter, became royal engineer - traveled throughout empire, brought together architectural styles Work epitomizes glory Suleiman gave to architecture, building during his reign … “the Magnificant” • Architect was Mimar Sinan (1490-1588): [see Minar Sinan in ‘Resources’] Photo from: http://www.allaboutturkey.com/si nan.htm … “the Magnificent” The Empire in 1566 Suleiman also known as the ‘Magnificent’ because the empire reached its geographical apex during his reign -- strong territorial advances in North Africa, central Europe (to walls of Vienna), Bessarabia and Iraq.
[Show full text]
The Making of Sultan Süleyman: a Study of Process/Es of Image-Making and Reputation Management
THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT by NEV ĐN ZEYNEP YELÇE Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Sabancı University June, 2009 © Nevin Zeynep Yelçe 2009 All Rights Reserved To My Dear Parents Ay şegül and Özer Yelçe ABSTRACT THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT Yelçe, Nevin Zeynep Ph.D., History Supervisor: Metin Kunt June 2009, xv+558 pages This dissertation is a study of the processes involved in the making of Sultan Süleyman’s image and reputation within the two decades preceding and following his accession, delineating the various phases and aspects involved in the making of the multi-layered image of the Sultan. Handling these processes within the framework of Sultan Süleyman’s deeds and choices, the main argument of this study is that the reputation of Sultan Süleyman in the 1520s was the result of the convergence of his actions and his projected image. In the course of this study, main events of the first ten years of Sultan Süleyman’s reign are conceptualized in order to understand the elements employed first in making a Sultan out of a Prince, then in maintaining and enhancing the sultanic image and authority. As such, this dissertation examines the rhetorical, ceremonial, and symbolic devices which came together to build up a public image for the Sultan. Contextualized within a larger framework in terms of both time and space, not only the meaning and role of each device but the way they are combined to create an image becomes clearer.
[Show full text]
Tekirdağ Ili 2013 Yili Çevre Durum Raporu
T.C. TEKİRDAĞ VALİLİĞİ ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ TEKİRDAĞ İLİ 2013 YILI ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU HAZIRLAYAN: ÇED VE ÇEVRE İZİNLERİ ŞUBE MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ÇEVRE YÖNETİMİ VE ÇEVRE DENETİMİ ŞUBE MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ TEKİRDAĞ-2014 TEKİRDAĞ İL ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU 2013 2 İçindekiler A.HAVA ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 A.1.HAVA KALİTESİ .................................................................................................................................................... 13 A.2. HAVA KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİ EDEN UNSURLAR ............................................................................................. 14 A.3. HAVA KALİTESİ KONTROLÜ KONUSUNDAKİ ÇALIŞMALAR ............................................................................... 15 A.4. ÖLÇÜM İSTASYONLARI ........................................................................................................................................ 16 A.5.EGZOZ GAZI EMİSYON KONTROLÜ ..................................................................................................................... 17 A.6.GÜRÜLTÜ .............................................................................................................................................................. 18 A.7. İKLİM DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ EYLEM PLANI ÇERÇEVESİNDE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALAR .................................................... 19 A.8. SONUÇ VE DEĞERLENDİRME ..............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]