FORWARD Annual Report and Accounts 2001 >EQUIPPED >Being Prepared Is Everything

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FORWARD Annual Report and Accounts 2001 >EQUIPPED >Being Prepared Is Everything Smiths Group plc Annual report and accounts 2001 >FORWARD Annual report and accounts 2001 >EQUIPPED >Being prepared is everything. At Smiths we focus on the future. What will our customers want tomorrow? How can we exploit technology to provide enhanced solutions for their most demanding applications? How can we extend our capabilities to give them the service they need? We are constantly searching for ways to add value for our customers. This is how we generate profitable organic growth. >DISCOVERY >Discovery is about being always one step ahead. It is about meeting needs in ways that others haven’t yet thought of. It is about developing products that provide innovative solutions for the toughest applications. Through total commitment to research and development, Smiths seeks sustainable competitive advantage. >TEAMWORK >At Smiths we believe in teamwork. We work closely with our suppliers and customers to build productive partnerships and long-term relationships. Within the company, too, teamwork is essential. Not just working together day by day, but focusing everyone's efforts on maximum efficiency, productivity, flexibility and responsiveness. Through teamwork we seek to be a leader. >REACH >In a world where efficiency is paramount, customers want to deal with fewer, better suppliers. At Smiths we have the necessary size and diversity. We are global. Our products are wide-ranging. We have the reach to be our customers’ preferred supplier. 01 03 01 As a first-tier supplier working directly 03 We are a leading supplier of products used with prime manufacturers, we are during critical and intensive care procedures, delivering systems for front-line defence and for continuing care during recovery. aircraft such as Eurofighter Typhoon. 04 Our solutions for demanding environments 02 Holding strong positions in world markets, include high-integrity connectors and our mechanical and polymer seals ensure devices to protect communications and reliability in critical processes, such as in other equipment against power surges and oil and gas industries, and are backed with lightning strikes. high levels of customer support and global distribution. 02 04 >FORWARD SMITHS IS A FORWARD-THINKING, FOCUSED ENGINEERING COMPANY WITH MARKET-LEADING POSITIONS WORLDWIDE IN ITS FOUR CHOSEN AREAS OF SPECIALISATION. 08 Smiths Group plc Annual report and accounts 2001 >SUMMARY PERFORMANCE 2001 >Operating profit on continuing activities up 13% to £525m. >Increased sales and profits from all four divisions. >Margins maintained at 15%, cash at 80% of profits. >Dividend increased by 5% to 25.0p for the year. >Successful demerger of Automotive. >Restructuring in Aerospace and Sealing Solutions well under way. Total, including discontinued Continuing activities 2001 2000 2001 2000 For the 12 months to 31 July £m £m £m £m Sales 4,958 4,653 3,466 3,062 Operating profit 651 622 525 465 Pre-tax 535 542 448* 428* Earnings per share 68.3p 68.6p 57.4p* 54.2p* before exceptionals and amortisation *pro-forma Contents 08 Introducing Smiths Group 48 Consolidated profit and loss account 09 Summary performance 2001 48 Statement of total recognised 10 Chairman’s statement gains and losses 12 Chief Executive’s review 50 Balance sheets 17 Smiths at a glance 51 Cash-flow statement 18 Business review 52 Notes to the accounts 27 Financial review 73 Accounting policies 31 Investing in global talent 74 Statement of value added 36 Board of Directors 75 Five year review 38 Directors’ report 76 Senior management 42 Directors’ emoluments and interests 77 Shareholder information 47 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 78 Notice of Annual General Meeting 47 Auditors’ report ibc Index 09 Smiths Group plc Annual report and accounts 2001 >CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT Smiths Group is nearly twice year the continuing Smiths activities the size it was when we reported a generated a 12% after-tax rate 25p year ago, directly as a result of the of return on total shareholder merger with TI Group. Consequently, investment, including goodwill, the figures in this Report and of £2.7bn. This is well above the % Accounts are all substantially company’s cost of capital, and 2001 2000 change increased, being the sum of the we are confident we can lift the Dividend (p) 25.0p 23.8p +5% two parts. More significantly, these rate of return still higher. Further figures also show a strong increase reassurance can be found in the over the previous performance of Directors’ Report, where there is the equivalent, formerly separate, a full statement of the procedures companies. The most important for internal controls, audit and 12% number to focus on for 2001 is the evaluation of potential risks to £525m of operating profits on the the business. These matters are continuing activities, because this regularly reviewed by the Board is the one that will allow the most and we are confident we have SMITHS GENERATED A 12% AFTER-TAX direct comparison when looking robust systems in place. RATE OF RETURN ON TOTAL SHAREHOLDER forward and at last year. The Chief INVESTMENT Executive therefore concentrates his The company answers to its report on the performance of these shareholders for its financial continuing activities. performance: without their equity it could not exist. However, we However, I shall first detail the recognise broader responsibilities, consolidated results of Smiths Group and we aim to report on these as it was for most of last year, which with the same degree of analysis includes the discontinued activities, as we do for our financial capital. principally the now demerged This year, in the section headed Automotive business. On sales of ‘Investing in global talent’ on page 31, £5bn, of which Automotive accounted we detail how we value our human for £1.5bn, Smiths earned operating capital, make progress on health and profits of £651m. After interest costs of safety, and meet our environmental £116m, the pre-tax profit was £535m, obligations. We respect the legitimate resulting in earnings per share of interest of customers, suppliers, 68.3p. All of these figures are reported employees and our local communities before goodwill amortisation and in these topics. exceptional charges, on which the Chief Executive gives a full report. The merger has doubled the number of people working for The Board is recommending a final Smiths, but there have been no dividend of 16.25p, bringing the total significant cultural issues from for the year to 25.0p, an increase of bringing the two companies together. 5%, and a level of payment which is We have worked hard to create an more than twice covered by earnings inclusive environment, stepping from the continuing activities alone. up our internal communications by introducing a company-wide The company’s underlying good health electronic newsflow system. will become apparent on reading the This lets employees know what Financial Director’s Review on page 27. is happening more quickly, and A highlight of this for me is that last supplements well-established 10 Smiths Group plc Annual report and accounts 2001 THE SUCCESS OF SMITHS IS ENTIRELY THE RESULT OF THE ENTHUSIASM AND COMMITMENT OF OUR PEOPLE. methods such as open-forum The Chief Executive outlines our view discussions with management. of the prospects for the company at The success of Smiths is entirely the conclusion of his Review overleaf. the result of the enthusiasm and As we prepared this Report and commitment of our people, and Accounts, our uncertainty about I would like to express here my which way the world’s economies appreciation of their support. would go was compounded by the dreadful terrorist attacks in the We took the opportunity to change US, which touched all of us. Even the company’s name slightly, taking so, it should be clear to readers of the view that ‘Industries’ implies this Report that Smiths has a great factories rather than technologies. It number of actions under way to was done with minimal expense, and improve our relative performance, the new identity and presentational and that shareholders will quickly style can be seen throughout this see the benefit of this. document. I trust you will approve. The Board was carefully rebalanced following the merger, to combine expertise from both TI and Smiths. There were two executive additions Keith Orrell-Jones from TI: John Langston joined to Chairman run Sealing Solutions, where his prior knowledge will greatly benefit the essential restructuring; David Lillycrop joined as General Counsel, and is also Company Secretary. Three former TI non-executives also came across, bringing valuable industry, government and city experience: Sir Colin Chandler, Sir Nigel Broomfield and John Hignett. Colin is my deputy and Chairman of the Audit Committee, and I chair the Nominations and Remuneration Committee myself. There are two strong features of this Board that I want to point out. First, we six non-executives provide real balance and external influence on Board deliberations, which are always lively and constructive. Secondly, our executive directors comprise the team with hands-on responsibility for the entire business. This gives us great insight into how Smiths is performing, together with a good grasp on future strategy. 11 >CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW Financial highlights of continuing activities Smiths Group made significant to £3.5bn. The comparisons are with 2001 2000 progress in the year ended July 2001. the same – but then separate – For the 12 months to 31 July £m £m In the first half we completed the businesses now merged into the Sales 3,466 3,062 strategically important merger with combined entity. After allocating a Operating profit* 525 465 TI Group, which has substantially proportion of total interest costs to Pre-tax* 448 428 enlarged the company and the discontinued activities, the pre- Earnings per share* 57.4p 54.2p in particular given it a much tax profit for continuing Smiths was *before exceptionals and amortisation stronger position in the fast- up 5% at £448m, and earnings per consolidating aerospace industry.
Recommended publications
  • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
    Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management
    [Show full text]
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2001: Armaments, Disarmament and International
    Appendix 4D. The 100 largest arms-producing companies, 1999 REINHILDE WEIDACHER, ANNE BRANDT-HANSEN and the SIPRI ARMS INDUSTRY NETWORK* I. The SIPRI ‘top 100’ in 1999 and major events in 2000 After half a decade of rapid concentration in the context of shrinking markets, the Western arms industry has entered a new phase of reorganization in which a smaller number of large companies face a constant if not growing level of demand for new military equipment. A period of intensive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) began in the early 1990s. Among large aerospace companies, concentration culminated in 1997–98 in the USA and in 1999–2000 in Western Europe. The high rate of concentration in 1999 is reflected in the significant increase in the combined value of arms sales of the 100 largest arms-producing companies in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and developing countries (except China)— by more than 11 per cent in nominal terms, from $141 billion in 1998 to $157 billion in 1999 (table 4D.2).1 Mergers and acquisitions accounted for the overwhelming share of this increase. The US Government responded to the high rate of concentration achieved by 1999 with an arms industrial policy which had as one of its major aims to preserve a suffi- cient level of competition in order to improve ‘affordability’ for the Department of Defense (DOD) and promote ‘innovation’ in military technology. In July 2000 the DOD adopted a new competition policy ‘requiring that DOD consider the effects of its acquisitions and technology strategy and budget plans on future competition’.2 To facilitate continued competition the DOD also favours a ‘competitive transatlantic industrial model—with industrial linkages among multiple firms on both sides of the Atlantic and technology sharing subject to security safeguards’.3 M&A in the US arms industry continued in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors
    Board of Directors 1. John McFarlane OBE 2. Tim O’Toole CBE 3. Chris Surch Chairman Chief Executive Group Finance Director Appointed to the Board: 2013 Appointed to the Board: 2009 Appointed to the Board: 2012 Skills and experience: He was appointed to the Skills and experience: He was appointed to Skills and experience: He has a strong track Board in December 2013 and became Chairman the Board in 2009 and became Chief Executive record of financial leadership as well as extensive in January 2014. John has a proven track record in 2010. Tim brings to the Board a wealth of operational, strategic and international experience. of implementing cultural transformation and driving international transport management experience Chris was previously Group Finance Director of through strategic change. He was formerly CEO gained over a number of years in the sector. Prior Shanks Group plc, also for a period of time serving of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd, to joining the Company, he was Managing Director, as their acting Chief Executive. Following an early Group Executive Director of Standard Chartered plc London Underground, having previously been at career with Price Waterhouse, he joined TI Group and Chairman of Aviva plc. He will step down as Transport for London, and prior to which he was plc in 1995. He held a number of senior roles there Chairman at the conclusion of the forthcoming President and Chief Executive of Consolidated and following the merger of TI Group plc with Annual General Meeting. Rail Corporation. Smiths Group plc he went on to hold further senior Other appointments: Chairman of Barclays plc Other appointments: He is a Non-Executive finance roles, latterly serving as Finance Director of and Barclays Bank plc, and a Non-Executive Director of CSX Corporation, a rail freight their Speciality Engineering division.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversified International Fund As of April 30, 2018
    Diversified International Fund As of April 30, 2018 SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS MARKET % TOTAL NET ISSUER SHARES VALUE ASSETS Australia CSL Ltd 814,527 $ 104,331,664 0.83% Macquarie Group Ltd 1,257,437 $ 102,403,171 0.81% Mirvac Group 31,695,172 $ 53,190,044 0.42% Treasury Wine Estates Ltd 2,867,805 $ 40,963,586 0.32% Dexus 5,413,746 $ 38,500,008 0.30% Total Australia $ 339,388,473 2.69% Austria Erste Group Bank AG 1,747,280 $ 85,444,781 0.68% Raiffeisen Bank International AG 1,820,658 $ 61,458,171 0.49% Total Austria $ 146,902,952 1.16% Brazil Vale SA 11,208,800 $ 155,596,011 1.23% Itausa - Investimentos Itau SA 24,445,471 $ 94,552,447 0.75% Banco do Brasil SA 8,072,700 $ 84,616,792 0.67% Ambev SA 8,524,800 $ 56,747,641 0.45% Hypera SA 4,186,014 $ 37,809,402 0.30% MRV Engenharia e Participacoes SA 5,609,500 $ 23,922,679 0.19% Petrobras Distribuidora SA 3,559,400 $ 23,493,140 0.19% Itausa - Investimentos Itau SA 591,015 $ 2,277,547 0.02% Total Brazil $ 479,015,659 3.79% Canada Brookfield Asset Management Inc 3,415,802 $ 135,387,020 1.07% Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 2,134,900 $ 119,901,584 0.95% Canadian National Railway Co 1,551,948 $ 119,869,686 0.95% Suncor Energy Inc 2,765,500 $ 105,756,494 0.84% Dollarama Inc 839,416 $ 96,706,581 0.77% Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc 2,195,346 $ 94,913,086 0.75% TransCanada Corp 2,122,306 $ 89,986,634 0.71% Bank of Montreal 1,101,600 $ 84,459,289 0.67% Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 2,005,800 $ 72,361,584 0.57% Bank of Nova Scotia/The 1,122,400 $ 68,990,076 0.55% Open Text Corp 968,800 $ 34,203,594 0.27% Total
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017
    Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017 Appendix D: Securities Held by Funds The Four Funds hold thousands of publicly and privately traded securities. Act 44 directs the Four Funds to publish “a list of all publicly traded securities held by the public fund.” For consistency in presenting the data, a list of all holdings of the Four Funds is obtained from Pennsylvania Treasury Department. The list includes privately held securities. Some privately held securities lacked certain data fields to facilitate removal from the list. To avoid incomplete removal of privately held securities or erroneous removal of publicly traded securities from the list, the Four Funds have chosen to report all publicly and privately traded securities. The list below presents the securities held by the Four Funds as of June 30, 2017. 1345 AVENUE OF THE A 1 A3 144A AAREAL BANK AG ABRY MEZZANINE PARTNERS LP 1721 N FRONT STREET HOLDINGS AARON'S INC ABRY PARTNERS V LP 1-800-FLOWERS.COM INC AASET 2017-1 TRUST 1A C 144A ABRY PARTNERS VI L P 198 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABACUS PROPERTY GROUP ABRY PARTNERS VII L P 1MDB GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L ABAXIS INC ABRY PARTNERS VIII LP REGS ABB CONCISE 6/16 TL ABRY SENIOR EQUITY II LP 1ST SOURCE CORP ABB LTD ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS II LP 200 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS IV LP 21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA INC ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS V LP 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 4/15
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Investment in Indiana
    Indiana Economic Development Corporation FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN INDIANA 1,027 TOTAL COMPANIES EACH UNIQUE FLAG IN A COUNTY REPRESENTS ONE OR MORE COMPANIES OF THE FOLLOWING ORIGIN 12 Australia 12 Austria 3 Belgium 13 Brazil 78 Canada 21 China 6 Denmark 6 Finland 52 France 127 Germany 4 Hong Kong 8 India 42 Ireland 8 Israel 36 Italy 315 Japan 1 Liechtenstein 25 Luxembourg 1 Malaysia 14 Mexico 29 Netherlands 5 New Zealand 5 Norway 1 Poland 3 Portugal 1 Qatar 1 Russia 4 Saudi Arabia 3 Singapore 2 South Africa 10 South Korea 15 Spain 31 Sweden 39 Switzerland 5 Taiwan 1 Thailand 1 Turkey 1 United Arab Emirates 95 United Kingdom INCLUDING JOINT VENTURES 1 Australia/Spain 1 Austria/Germany 1 Denmark/USA 1 Finland/Ireland INDIANA IN RELATION TO THE U.S. 2 France/Germany SEATTLE 2 Germany/Japan 1 CHICAGO NEW YORK Japan/Luxembourg INDIANAPOLIS ST. 1 LOS ANGELES Japan/Switzerland ATLANTA 5 DALLAS Japan/USA 1 Spain/USA 1 NORTH CAPITOL AVENUE, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 | 800.463.8081 | TEL 317.232.8800 | FAX 317.232.4146 | iedc.in.gov REV 6.20 Indiana Economic Development Corporation FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN INDIANA AUSTRALIA SWITZERLAND Sims Metal Management East Chicago Schneider Electric USA, Inc. Mishawaka Mulzer Crushed Stone Leavenworth GECOM Corp. Greensburg Leclanche Anderson Nipro Pharma Packaging Westport Pratt Paper, LLC Gary Air Liquide America LP Mount Vernon Americas Nestle USA Beverage Division Anderson Mulzer Crushed Stone Mauckport Hitachi Powdered Metals, Greensburg C&R Racing Indianapolis Hahn Systems New Haven Mulzer Crushed Stone Newburgh (USA) Inc. NTN Bearing Corporation of UBS Financial Services Anderson Cardno Indianapolis America Whitestown LafargeHolcim East Chicago Air Liquide America LP Pittsboro Seabrook Technology Group Pendleton Honda Manufacturing of Indiana Greensburg Delivra Indianapolis Geodis Logistics Plainfield Medtronic Plainfield LLC Kuri Tec Mfg.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, Chairman & CEO • ILFC Colin Stuart, Vice
    SPEEDNEWS 20TH ANNUAL AVIATION INDUSTRY SUPPLIERS CONFERENCE Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, Chairman & CEO • ILFC Mr. Hazy, in 1973, founded Interlease Group, Inc., which today is known as International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC), with a portfolio valued at more than $40b, consisting of more than 800 jet aircraft. ILFC is the largest customer of Airbus and Boeing. ILFC went public in 1983 with $220 million in assets and $8 million in profit. In 1990, ILFC was acquired by American Intl. Group, and since the acquisition, ILFC has generated a cumulative profit of $8.3b for AIG. In 1966, while an undergraduate student at UCLA, he formed Airlines Systems Research Consultants, a firm specializing in airline routes, fleet and planning analysis. His first clients included Aer Lingus, Mexicana and Air New Zealand. He later graduated from UCLA in 1968 with a BS in Economics and a minor in Intl. Relations. Mr. Hazy also serves on the Board of Directors of Skywest, Inc., and is on the Board of several foundations, educational institutions and corporations, and is the major donor for the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. He also has pilot type ratings in Gulfstreams, Learjets, Citations and presently is captain on the GV. Colin Stuart, Vice President-Marketing • Airbus Colin Stuart was appointed to his current position, VP-Marketing, in May 1996. His responsibilities include managing both the development and implementation of customer/product marketing activities and related marketing support services for the complete range of Airbus commercial products. He studied under the British Aerospace undergraduate apprenticeship scheme before obtaining a degree in aeronautical engineering from Bath University in 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Evenlode Investment View January 2020
    Evenlode Investment View January 2020 In this month’s investment view, I’ll review 2019 for Evenlode Income and briefly discuss my thoughts on the outlook. I’ve also included a summary of the fourth quarter as an appendix for those interested. It’s been a relatively quiet start to 2020 so far, with Evenlode Income up +1.3% and the UK market +1.2%*. The full year results season is commencing with lots of company updates due over the next few weeks. I’ll discuss some key themes that we’re hearing from the corporate world in February’s investment view. From Pessimism to Optimism At the beginning of 2019, investor sentiment was quite negative with worries over rising interest rate rises, trade tariffs, the global economy and Brexit. This had caused a significant sell-off in most stock markets at the end of 2018 and was beginning to create a valuation environment that we felt was as interesting as it had been for three or four years. Since then sentiment has, quite sharply, swung towards optimism. Though the global economy did slow during the year, it’s just about muddled along, and perhaps most significantly for financial assets, monetary policy was eased. Towards the end of the year better news on US/China trade tariffs and more clarity on the UK’s political situation also helped. This meant 2019 ended up being a strong year for most global stock markets. A Long-Term Approach Evenlode Income returned 24.3% during the year compared to 19.2% for the FTSE All-Share.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defence Industry in the 21St Century
    The Defence Industry in the 21st Century “With nine countries (and their collective industrial prowess) involved in its development, the F-35 repre- sents a new model of inter- national cooperation, ensuring affordable U.S. and coalition partner security well into the 21st century” – Sources: Photograph by US Department of Defense, Quote by Lockheed Martin Corporation Thinking Global … or thinking American? “With nine countries (and their collective industrial prowess) involved in its development, the F-35 represents a new model of international cooperation, ensuring affordable U.S. and coalition partner security well into the 21st century” – Sources: Photograph by US Department of Defense, Quote by Lockheed Martin Corporation Welcome The purpose of this paper is to provoke a debate. To stimulate further the dialogue we enjoy with our clients around the world. As the world’s largest professional services firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers works with clients in every segment of the defence industry – from the Americas to the whole of Europe; from the Middle East and Africa to Asia and the Pacific Rim. On many occasions, our discussions focus on the technical issues in which we are pre-eminently well-qualified to advise. Here, however, we seek to debate the issues that affect your industry. To review the factors that shaped today’s environment, to assess the implications for contractors and to look at the factors that might shape the future. Our views are set out in the following pages. We have debated some of these issues with some of our clients already but the time is right for a broader discus- sion.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeantransatlanticarmscoope
    ISB?: 960-8124-26-3 © 2003 Defence Analysis Institute 17, Valtetsiou Street 10680 Athens, Greece Tel.: (210) 3632902 Fax: (210) 3632634 web-site: www.iaa.gr e-mail: [email protected] Preface Introduction The European Defence Industrial Base and ESDP RESTRUCTURING OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY THE INDUSTRY-LED RESTRUCTURING PROCESS. 1997-1999: the European defence industry under pressure 13 Firms seek economies of scale and enlargement of the market State/industry consensus on the need for industrial consolidation From international cooperation to transnational integration 18 The first cooperative programmes, common subsidiaries and joint ventures Privatisation Concentration Groups with diversified activities Appraisal by sector of activities 27 Defence aerospace and electronics: a strategy of segment consolidation The land and naval armaments sectors: an industrial scene divided along national lines Trends in European defence industrial direct employment 37 Overview Situation by country THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 41 The permanence of the Europe/United States imbalance 43 Unfavourable conditions... …in the face of the American strategy of expansion in Europe First initiatives aimed at creating a favourable environment for European defence industries 48 Creation of ad hoc structures by the principal armaments producing countries (Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain and Sweden) First steps towards an institutional strategy for the EU in the field of armaments ALL-UNION INITIATIVES, ENHANCED COOPERATION AND CONVERGENCE OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]