DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable D 4.1 Specification for Laboratory Specimens and Testing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable D 4.1 Specification for Laboratory Specimens and Testing NEW INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE BASED NIKER APPROACHES TO THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL Grant Agreement n° HERITAGE FROM EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED RISK 244123 Deliverable D 4.1 Specification for laboratory specimens and testing strategies on walls Due date: September 2010 Submission date: 15/09/2010 Issued by: BAM/ZRS WORKPACKAGE 4: Optimization of design for vertical elements Partners: UNIPD, ITAM, NTUA, POLIMI, UMINHO, UPC, CDCU, S&B, ZRS, MONU Leader: BAM PROJECT N°: 244123 ACRONYM: NIKER TITLE: New integrated knowledge based approaches to the protection of cultural heritage from earthquake-induced risk COORDINATOR: Università di Padova (Italy) START DATE: 01 January 2010 DURATION: 36 months INSTRUMENT: Collaborative Project Small or medium scale focused research project THEME: Environment (including Climate Change) Dissemination level: PU Rev: FIN NEW INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE BASED NIKER APPROACHES TO THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL Grant Agreement n° HERITAGE FROM EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED RISK 244123 INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS OF THE WORK PACKAGE ................................................... 1 2 VERTICAL ELEMENTS UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOAD ......................................................... 2 2.1 Material properties .............................................................................................................. 2 2.1.1 Masonry materials and masonry ..................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Composite characteristics of masonry ............................................................................ 6 2.1.3 Monolithic/homogeneous vertical elements .................................................................... 7 2.2 Load scenarios for vertical elements with respect to experiments ..................................... 9 2.2.1 Earthquakes and seismic waves ..................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Seismic loading and structural response of vertical elements ...................................... 10 2.2.3 Simulated earthquake motions ..................................................................................... 12 3 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON VERTICAL ELEMENTS AND TEST PROCEDURES – STATE OF THE ART ...................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Laboratory tests on stone masonry walls ......................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Simple compression tests ............................................................................................. 14 3.1.2 In-plane behaviour of masonry walls under combined vertical and horizontal loads .... 22 3.2 Laboratory tests on earthen materials and walls .............................................................. 30 3.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2 Compression and flexural tests on materials and small wall elements ......................... 31 3.2.3 Compression and diagonal compression tests on wall elements ................................. 35 3.2.4 In-plane behaviour of masonry walls subjected to shear loading ................................. 36 3.2.5 Cyclic testing ................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.6 Dynamic testing ............................................................................................................ 39 4 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS WITHIN THE WORKPACKAGE ............................................. 40 4.1 General approach ............................................................................................................. 40 4.2 Materials and wall types ................................................................................................... 40 4.3 Specimen type and type of loading .................................................................................. 41 4.4 Strengthening techniques ................................................................................................. 42 5 DETAILED EXPERIMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR EACH PARTNER .................................... 44 5.1 Partner n° 1 – UNIPD ....................................................................................................... 44 5.1.1 Stone masonry walls - Laboratory experimental campaign .......................................... 44 5.1.2 Stone Masonry Walls - In-situ Experimental Campaign ................................................ 47 5.1.3 Experimental campaign on composite materials .......................................................... 48 5.1.4 Experimental program on shear tests ........................................................................... 49 5.1.5 Experimental program on durability (in cooperation with POLIMI) ................................ 49 Optimization of design for walls and pillars D4.1 i NEW INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE BASED NIKER APPROACHES TO THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL Grant Agreement n° HERITAGE FROM EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED RISK 244123 5.2 Partners n° 2 and 17– BAM in collaboration with ZRS: Tests on earthen structural elements ...................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2.1 Scope and objectives .................................................................................................... 50 5.2.2 Materials and material properties .................................................................................. 50 5.2.3 Static experiments on small sized wall segments ......................................................... 52 5.2.4 Dynamic in-plane loading experiments with unidirectional horizontal sliding table ....... 54 5.3 Partner n° 3 – ITAM: Bhutan case - Construction in Bhutan ............................................ 55 5.3.1 Introduction and objectives ........................................................................................... 55 5.3.3 Experimental Program .................................................................................................. 56 5.4 Partner n° 4 and 16 – NTUA in collaboration with S&B: Stone Masonry Walls - Laboratory Experimental Campaign .............................................................................................................. 57 5.4.1 Introduction and Objectives .......................................................................................... 57 5.4.2 Experimental Program .................................................................................................. 58 5.5 Partner n° 5 – POLIMI ...................................................................................................... 59 5.5.1 Stone Masonry Walls - In-situ Experimental Campaign on wall quality (in cooperation with UNIPD) ............................................................................................................................. 59 5.5.2 Stone Masonry Walls - In-situ Experimental Campaign on wall repair by injection (in collaboration with UNIPD) ........................................................................................................ 60 5.5.3 Experimental program on the durability of repairs by composite materials ................... 61 5.6 Partner n° 6 – UMINHO .................................................................................................... 64 5.6.1 Experimental program on timber frame walls ............................................................... 64 5.6.2 Experimental program on grout injection of rammed earth ........................................... 65 5.6.3 Experimental program on bond durability of composite materials applications to masonry structures .................................................................................................................. 68 5.6.4 Experimental program on direct shear tests ................................................................. 71 5.7 Partner n° 10 – ENA ......................................................................................................... 71 5.8 Partner n° 11 – CDCU: Case study Meqaad Radwan, Ottoman Period (1650 AD.) ........ 72 5.8.1 Introduction and objectives ........................................................................................... 72 5.8.2 Materials and material properties .................................................................................. 72 5.8.3 Experimental program ................................................................................................... 72 5.9 Partner n° 18 – MONUMENTA ......................................................................................... 73 5.9.1 Materials and materials properties ................................................................................ 73 5.9.2 Experimental program ................................................................................................... 73 6 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 75 Optimization of design for walls and pillars D4.1 ii NEW INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE BASED NIKER APPROACHES TO THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL Grant Agreement n° HERITAGE FROM EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED RISK 244123 1 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS OF THE WORK PACKAGE The structural response of historical buildings to earthquakes is manifold and complex. This re- sponse does not only depend on the type of earthquake wave,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brick Masonry Brick
    Brick Masonry Brick • Brick is a basic building unit which is in the form of rectangular block in which length to breadth ratio is 2 but height can be different. • Normal size (nominal size) • 9''×4½" ×3" • Architectural size (Working size) • 81⅟16" x 4⁵⁄₁₆" x 21⅟16" • Brick Masonary The art of laying bricks in mortor in a proper systematic manner gives homogeneous mass which can withstand forces without disintigration, called brick masonary. Terminology: The surfaces of a brick have names: Top and bottom surfaces are beds. Ends are headers and header faces. Sides are stretchers or stretcher faces. Bricks are the subject of British Standard BS 3921. Brick Sizes A standard metric brick has coordinating dimensions of 225 x 112.5 x 75 mm (9''×4½" ×3“) called nominal size and working dimensions (actual dimensions) of 215 x 102.5 x 65 mm (8.5“ * 4 *2.5) called architectural size Brick Sizes Brick Sizes The coordinating dimensions are a measure of the physical space taken up by a brick together with the mortar required on one bed , one header face and one stretcher face. The working dimensions are the sizes to which manufacturers will try to make the bricks. Methods of manufacture for many units and components are such that the final piece is not quite the size expected but it can fall within the defined limits. This can be due to the things like shrinkage, distortion when drying out, firing etc. The difference between the working and coordinating dimensions of a brick is 10mm (0.5“)and this difference is taken up with the layer of mortar into which the bricks are pressed when laying.
    [Show full text]
  • Static and Seismic Retrofit of Masonry Arch Bridges Case Studies
    Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability – Biondini & Frangopol (Eds) © 2012 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3 Static and seismic retrofit of masonry arch bridges: case studies G.Tecchio, F. da Porto, P. Zampieri, C. Modena Department of Structural and Transportation Engineering, University of Padova, Italy C. Bettio S.M. Ingegneria srl, Via longhin 6, Padova, Italy ABSTRACT: Thousands of road and railway masonry arch bridges are still in operation in the Italian trans- portation network: most of them need being improved in their carrying capacity and to be upgraded to the standards of the current seismic code. In this paper three case-studies of the static and seismic retrofit of his- torical masonry arch bridges are presented, outlining some methodological approaches to the renewal inter- vention according to the different typological characteristics of the bridges and their state of maintenance. The main phases of work, combining both traditional and innovative strengthening techniques, are described. In the S.Gallo Bridge the load bearing capacity of the existing structure has been preserved and increased through a thickening of the old arch with a new layer of brick masonry and the application of CFRP laminates. Many refurbishment techniques, derived from the historical heritage restoration field, have been used for the Rio Moline Bridge, where new longitudinal internal brick spandrel walls connected to the extrados of the vaults have been built to share some of the load and enhance the seismic resistance. In the case of the Gresal Bridge the seismic vulnerability has been reduced by creating a new structural arrangement through a new rc slab anchored to the piers with vertical ties and restrained at the abutments, collaborating with the existing structure in carrying horizontal loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Tiling Installation Guide
    Wall Tiling Installation Guide February 2017 1 Important Notes 3 Internal Wall Substrates 4-5 Planning 6 General Information 7-8 Installing: Glass tiles. 9-11 Glass tiles with Painted backs & Protective Layers. Installing: Installing Glass Mosaics. 12-15 Installing Glass & Slate Mosaics. Installing Crackle Glaze tiles. 16-17 Installing Glazed Ceramic & Porcelain tiles. 18-19 Installing Mother of Pearl. 20-21 Installing Floor tiles on a wall. 21 Product Notes. 22 Glossary. 22 Substrate Preparation Guide. 23 Tile Essentials Product Selector – Glazed Wall Tiles. 24-26 Tile Essentials Product Selector – Stone / Slate / Mother of Pearl. 27-28 Tile Essential Product Selector – Glass Wall Tiles. 29-30 Tile Essential Product Selector – Floor Tiles. 30 Sealants and Finishes. 31 2 Important Notes The purpose of this booklet is to outline the basic principles of installing Fired Earth wall tiles. This is intended as a guide, we would always recommend you refer to British Standard BS 5385 Wall and Floor Tiling for more detailed technical information. Prior to installation please ensure the tiles purchased are suitable for the application and thoroughly inspected. Ensure your tiler is aware of the expected finish of the tiles and there are sufficient tiles for the area. The tiles must be well shuffled by drawing tiles from all the boxes. Dry lay an area in suitable light as a final check before installation. For further information or if any doubt exists, please telephone our Technical Department for advice prior to commencing any tiling. Fired Earth have tested our range of adhesives, grout and sealants to ensure compatibility with all of our tiles (see our Product Selector on pages 25 to 31).
    [Show full text]
  • Mortar Mix No
    Mortar Mix No. 1102 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION when they become "thumb print" hard. This will make the mortar joint water-tight and provide a Basic use: QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix (#1102) is neat appearance. a type N masonry mortar for use in laying brick, Coverage: Refer to table 1 for approximate block or stone; and repairing of masonry walls. coverage for each bag size. Use for brick or stone fireplaces, brick walls, block walls, parge coats, tuck pointing, stucco Table 1: Mortar Mix Usage Chart and plaster. Bag Size Standard Block Standard ® 8" X 8" X 16" Brick Composition and materials: QUIKRETE (200 mm X 200 mm X 8" X 2" X 4" Mortar (Masonry) Mix consists of a uniformly 410 mm) (200 mm X 50 blended mixture of fine sand, and type N mm X 100 mm) masonry cement. 80-lb. 12 37 Packaging: Available in three sizes: 80 lbs. (36.3 kg) (36.3 kg), 60 lbs. (27.2 kg), and 40 lbs. (18.1 28 kg). 60 lbs. 9 (27.2 kg) Technical Data QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix meets and exceeds the 40 lbs. 6 19 physical property requirements of ASTM (18.1 kg) designation 387 (Standard Specifications for Packaged, Dry, Combined Materials for Mortar Tuck Pointing or Repointing and Concrete) and ASTM C 270 for Type N Mortar. Product achieves a compressive Mixing: Mix QUIKRETE Mortar Mix with just strength in excess of 750 psi (5.17 MPa) in 28 enough water to form a damp unworkable mix day. that retains its form when pressed into a ball in the hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Tile Failure in the Physical and Recreational Training Building, HMCS Shearwater, Dartmouth, N.S
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Wall tile failure in the physical and recreational training building, HMCS Shearwater, Dartmouth, N.S. Tibbetts, D. C. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/20359026 Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1962-05-01 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=030d3c84-a61e-4721-abe0-14e7dc285439 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=030d3c84-a61e-4721-abe0-14e7dc285439 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • SP 20 (1991): Handbook on Masonry Design and Construction [CED 13: Building Construction Practices Including Painting, Varnishing and Allied Finishing]
    इंटरनेट मानक Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public. “जान का अधकार, जी का अधकार” “परा को छोड न 5 तरफ” Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan Jawaharlal Nehru “The Right to Information, The Right to Live” “Step Out From the Old to the New” SP 20 (1991): Handbook on Masonry Design and Construction [CED 13: Building Construction Practices including Painting, Varnishing and Allied Finishing] “ान $ एक न भारत का नमण” Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda “Invent a New India Using Knowledge” “ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी चराया नह जा सकताह ै”ै Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam “Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen” HANDBOOK ON MASONRY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (First Revision) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002 SP 20(S&T) : 1991 FIRST PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 1981 FIRST REVISION MARCH 1991 0 BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS 1991 UDC 693 ISBN 81-7061-029-X PRICE Rs 200.00 PRINTED IN INDlA AT KAPOOR ART PRESS, A3813 MAYAPURI, NEW DELHI AND PUBLISHED BY BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, NEW DELHI 110002 .
    [Show full text]
  • Brickwork and Modern Methods of Construction
    January 2020 BRICKWORK AND MODERN METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION Brick Development Association www.brick.org.uk BRICKWORK & MMC 2 Contents Page INTRODUCTION 03 MMC DEFINITIONS 04 HISTORY OF BRICKWORK MMC 05 SLIP PANEL SYSTEMS - INDIVIDUAL SLIPS 06 - PANEL SYSTEMS 07 - RAIL AND TILE 08 PRECAST CONCRETE 09 PRE FABRICATED COMPONENTS 10 ROBOTICS 11 DESIGN & SPECIFICATION 12 REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING 15 SEVERELYBRICKWORK EXPOSED & MMC BRICKWORK 3 INTRODUCTION In construction there is a continuous desire to build projects to a higher quality, on a shorter timescale and at a reduced cost. The government's Construction Sector Deal challenges the industry to reduce construction cost by 1/3 and construction time by 1/2, whilst improving quality. One of the key drivers identified to achieve these targets is the development and expansion of Modern Methods of Construction. Brick manufacturers have been at the forefront of developing MMC systems for several years. Clay brick has undergone a dramatic transformation during the 20th century. From solid wall construction to the modern cavity wall, with improved levels of insulation and reduced water penetration. CAUTION REQUIRED The sector needs to be mindful that during the push for quicker and cheaper we don't compromise the quality of what is built, as has happened with previous attempts to develop MMC. One of the principal benefits of hand laid clay brick is that it has a very long history of quality performance with a large and proven supply chain. Assessing when it is appropriate to use a MMC system, to gain maximum Traditional solid wall construction benefits, has historically been a complex issue.
    [Show full text]
  • MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING at 310B ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT
    MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310b Route 32 Uncasville, Montville, Connecticut Specifications For MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING AT 310b ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT CLA Job No. 6765 February 2021 Prepared By: CLA Engineers, Inc. Consulting Engineers 317 Main Street Norwich, CT 06360 Ph: 860-886-1966 F: 860-886-9165 I. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS II. INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS III. PROPOSAL FORMS 1. BID PROPOSAL 2. FORM OF BID BOND 3. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT OF PRIME BIDDER 4. STATEMENT OF BIDDER’S QUALIFICATIONS 5. PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS IV. AGREEMENT AND BOND FORMS 1. CONTRACT AGREEMENT 2. CERTIFICATION 3. FORM OF PERFORMANCE BOND 4. FORM OF PAYMENT BOND V. GENERAL CONDITIONS VI. SPECIAL CONDITIONS VII. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS VIII. PHOTOGRAPHS Town of Montville CLA Engineers, Inc. Masonry Repair/Repointing, 310b Route 32. Civil · Structural · Survey I. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Town of Montville CLA Engineers, Inc. Masonry Repair/Repointing, 310b Route 32. Civil · Structural · Survey ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TOWN OF MONTVILLE IS SOLICITING BIDS FOR MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING 310b ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT Sealed bids for MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING AT 310b ROUTE 32, UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT will be received at Montville Town Hall, 310 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville CT, until 10:00 am on April 6th, 2021, prevailing time, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud in the Town Council Chambers. The Contract generally consists of the repair and repointing of the existing exterior brickwork of Building #2 located at 310b Route 32, Uncasville, Montville, CT. The 2-story masonry building has prevalent cracking in the mortar throughout, cracks that extend through bricks, spalling of brick, and mortar loss occurring frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Superfixall My
    SUPERFIXALL MY HIGH STRENGTH CEMENT-BASED ADHESIVE KEY Features Performance Properties Typical properties conducted at 22oC and 50% RH – High bond strength Cementitious grey or white Appearance – No odour powder – Economical Wet Density approx. 1.55 g/cm3 – Easy to clean Mixing Ratio 6.5 to 7 litres of water – Non-toxic 25 kg powder – Easy to spread Pot Life 2 hours – Thick and thin bed applications Open Time 30 minutes Tensile Strength ≥ 0.5 MPa DESCRIPTION After Immersion ≥ 0.5 MPa Superfixall MY is normal cementitious adhesive with Heat Ageing ≥ 0.5 MPa extended open time. It is an exceptionally high strength Open time at 30 cement based adhesive developed to bond all types of ≥ 0.5 MPa minutes ceramic tiles. Ideal for bonding monocottura and fully vitrified tiles, as well as natural stone, marble, granite and mosaic tiles onto brickwork, cement render and MIXING concrete walls and floors. 25 kg of Superfixall MY powder requires approximately 6.5 to 7.0 litres of clean water. CLASSIFICATION / STANDARDS BS EN12004 CLASSIFICATION Add the measured amount of clean water into a clean C1 Normal Cementitious Adhesive container and gradually pour Superfixall MY into the E Adhesive with extended open time water while continuously mix using electric paddle mixer. Eliminate lumps. Mixed thoroughly until homogeneous, SUITABLE SUBSTRATES thick tooth paste consistency is obtained. Let it stand • Concrete for 2 minutes and mix again. The adhesive is now ready • Cement render to use. • Brickwork • Blockwork Superfixall MY can be used as two (2) part system especially for installation of difficult bonding tiles such as SUBstrate preparation mosaic, porcelain and vitrified tiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Repointing Masonry Walls
    TM TECHNOLOGY BRIEF October 2002 RESOURCE INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE Section 6.2 Repointing Masonry Walls The durability and longevity of masonry is greater than that of any other building material, as evident in the thousands of old brick buildings throughout our neighborhoods and towns. When designed and constructed properly, masonry can last hundreds of years or more. To maximize the life of a masonry building, the mortar joints will need periodic maintenance during the building’s life cycle. As with any building product continuously exposed to the elements, the joints are susceptible to weathering, acids in the rain, seismic movement, building settlement, freezing and thawing cycles, impact damage, and dirt. When visual inspection reveals that the mortar joints are cracking or otherwise deteriorated, restoration is necessary to help maintain the integrity of the wall system. Commonly known as tuckpointing, “repointing” is the preferred term used to describe the process of cutting out deteriorated mortar joints in a masonry wall and filling in those joints with fresh mortar. The goals of a repointing job should be to remove and replace mortar in a way that will main- tain the structural properties of the wall, improve the appearance of the wall, and form weathertight joints. To accomplish this, the architect should produce drawings and specifications that will clearly state the requirements for mortar removal, joint preparation, preparation of pointing mortar, and placing mortar in the joints. For best results, use only contractors employing trained, skilled tuckpointers. Determining Scope The architect should determine the scope of the work with the assistance of the tuckpointing contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • MASON (Building Constructor)
    CURRICULUM FOR THE TRADE OF MASON (Building Constructor) UNDER APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING SCHEME (ATS) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT & ENTREPRENURESHIP DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING 1 CONTENTS Sl. No. Topics Page No. 1. Acknowledgement 03 2. Background 04 – 05 2.1 Apprenticeship Training under Apprentice Act 1961 2.2 Changes in Industrial Scenario 2.3 Reformation 3. Rationale 06 4. Job roles: reference NCO 07 5. General Information 08 6. Course structure 09 – 10 7. Syllabus 11 – 27 7.1 Basic Training 7.1.1 Detail syllabus of Core Skill A. Block-I (Engg. drawing & W/ Cal. & Sc.) B. Block-II (Engg. drawing & W/ Cal. & Sc.) 7.1.2 Detail syllabus of Professional Skill & Professional Knowledge A. Block – I B. Block – II 7.1.3 Employability Skill 7.1.3.1 Syllabus of Employability skill A. Block – I B. Block – II 7.2 Practical Training (On-Job Training) 7.2.1 Broad Skill Component to be covered during on-job training. A. Block – I B. Block – II Assessment Standard 28 – 30 8.1 Assessment Guideline 8. 8.2 Final assessment-All India trade Test (Summative assessment) 9. Further Learning Pathways 31 2 10. Annexure-I – Tools & Equipment for Basic Training 32 – 35 11. Annexure-II – Infrastructure for On-Job Training 36 12. Annexure-III - Guidelines for Instructors & Paper setter 37 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The DGT sincerely express appreciation for the contribution of the Industry, State Directorate, Trade Experts and all others who contributed in revising the curriculum. Special acknowledgement to the following industries/organizations who have contributed valuable inputs in revising the curricula through their expert members: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Guide for Stone Masonry and Dry-Laid Resources
    PRESERVATION GUIDE FOR STONE MASONRY AND DRY-LAID RESOURCES ABBY GLANVILLE GREG HARTELL INTERN FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION SUMMER 2008 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 7 OVERVIEW 8 CRATER LAKE: RESOURCES AT A GLANCE 10 MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES 16 DOCUMENTATION 37 GUIDELINE SUMMARY 38 HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS 43 ENDNOTES 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 A PHOTOGRAPHIC INVENTORY OF MASONRY AND DRY-LAID FEATURES WITH AN INTERACTIVE MAP SHOWING THE LOCA­ TIONS OF THESE FEATURES WAS DEVELOPED IN TANDEM WITH THIS MANUAL AND IS ON FILE WITH PARK HISTORIAN, STEVE MARK. 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MY SINCERE THANKS ARE EXTENDED TO THE FRIENDS OF CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION THROUGH THE GREG HARTELL INTERNSHIP. THIS INTERNSHIP ALLOWS GRADUA TE STU­ DENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM TO GAIN PROFESSIONAL EX­ PERIENCE THROUGH PRESERVATION RELATED PROJECTS AT CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK THANK YOU ALSO TO CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK SU­ PERINTENDENT CRAIG ACKERMAN FORMER INTERIM SU­ PERINTENDENT STEPHANIE TOOTH MAN, AND FORMER SUPERINTENDENT CHUCK LUNDY, AS WELL AS MARSHA MCCABE, CHIEF OF INTERPRETATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES, FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE GREG HARTELL INTERNSHIP FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION; MAC BROCK BRIAN COULTER, LINDA HILLIGOSS, LESLIE JEHNINGS, CHERI KILLAM BOMHARD, DAVE RlVARD, BOB SCHAEFER, LI A VELLA, AND JERRY WATSON FOR THEIR EXPERTISE, ADVICE, AND FEEDBACK; MARY BENTEROU, FOR PREPARING DIGITAL IMAGES OF DRAW­ INGS; KINGSTON HEATH, DIRECTOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM, AND TARA LKENOUYE FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN OBTAINING THIS INTERNSHIP; AND TO MY SUPERVISORS KARL BACH- MAN, CHIEF OF MAINTENANCE, WHOSE RESOURCEFUL­ NESS AND DEDICATION TO PRESERVING CULTURAL RE­ SOURCES WITHIN THE PARK MADE THIS WONDERFUL IN­ TERNSHIP PROJECT POSSIBLE, AND STEVE MARK, CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK HISTORIAN, WHOSE EXPERTISE IN THE PARK'S HISTORY AND ARCHITECTURE GREATLY EN­ RICHED BOTH THE INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE AND THE CONTENT OF THIS MANUAL.
    [Show full text]