Introduction Recruitment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I. -
Alliancing in Finnish Transport Agency, Finland
Alliancing in Finnish Transport Agency, Finland Pekka Petäjäniemi, Director, Finnish Transport Agency Finnish Transport Agency - Infrastructure* provides a platform for growth Infrastructure Current spending on FTA's share of the total assets on-going projects infrastructure market 19,5 billion € 2.9 billion € 1/4 *Roads, Railways & Fairways Number of people the Annual budget FTA personnel FTA employs indirectly approximately through projects 2,1 billion € 650 12,000 experts 2 www.liikennevirasto.fi Major Projects in Finland 2016 • In 2016 about 600 Million euros will spent on large investment projects (2016 • Current projects of the Projects Division amount to about 2,6 Billion euros. • 32 projects underway, of which • 23 road connection projects • 7 railway traffic projects • 2 fairway projects • An additional 4 projects in the preparation phase • A total of 26 project managers are working in the Major Projects Division. www.liikennevirasto.fi Current major projects ROAD PROJECTS FAIRWAYS PROJECTS 26 Pietarsaari channel 1 Ring Road III 2nd phase 27 Rauma channel 2 Main Road 19 Seinäjoki eastern bypass 28 Realignment of Savonlinna deep channel 3 Main Road 12 Tampereen rantaväylä 4 Road 101, Improvement of Ring Road I 5 Main Road 4 at Rovaniemi 6 Main Road 5 at Mikkeli 7 Main Road 8 Turku-Pori 8 West Metro park-and-ride facilities 9 E 18 Hamina-Vaalimaa (PPP project) 10 Main Road 6 Taavetti-Lappeenranta 11 Main Road 3 Grade separated junction at Arolampi 12 Road 148 Improvement at Kerava 13 Secondary Road 77, Viitasaari-Keitele 14 Main -
Regions of Eastern Finland (Summary)
Summary of views on the 2nd Cohesion Report Regions of Eastern Finland, 27.8.2001 Regions of South Karelia, South Savo, Kainuu, North Karelia and North Savo Starting point: - The EU regional policy is important for the development of Eastern Finland regions. - During the period 1995-1999 Eastern Finland was covered by the Obj 6, 5b and Interreg II A programmes. Of these the Obj 6 programme area was defined in the Accession Treaty of Finland and Sweden on account of specific circumstances of sparse population. - In the present period until 2006 the South Savo, North Karelia, North Savo and Kainuu regions form an Obj 1 programme area. At the same time East Finland has an A support status according to Article 87.3 of the Treaty, allowing allocation of higher state aid. The region of South Karelia is covered by the Obj 2 programme. In addition there are two Interreg III A programmes implemented in the area. - The Eastern Finland regions consider that the additionality principle has not been followed in the implementation of the regional development programmes. - The Eastern Finland (NUTS II area) GDP has lowered by 2.3 % between 1995-1999 in comparison to the EU average, and by over 5 % in comparison to the national average. It is very likely that the GDP/capita of Eastern Finland will not exceed 75 % of EU15 average without (national) specific measures. Views on the future Cohesion Policy: - The enlargement and increase of territorial inequality means that sufficient structural policy resources are required to guarantee a stable regional development. It seems that the proposed 0.45 % of the GDP will not be enough in the enlarged Union. -
The Kainuu Regional Experiment
SJPA The Kainuu regional experiment: deliberate and 19(4) unintended effects of scaling local government tasks to the regional level Arto Haveri, Jenni Airaksinen and Anni Jäntti* Abstract Arto Haveri This article examines the deliberate and unintended effects of the Kainuu Regional Exper- School of Management, iment, a regional reform where some important local government tasks were rescaled to University of Tampere the regional level. The analysis is based on the empirical results of a long-running evalua- [email protected] tion study. In Kainuu, the new regional government was successful in securing the quality Jenni Airaksinen and availability of welfare services, but in the task of regional development ‒ creating School of Management, new growth and development ‒ its role has been practically secondary, and in some cases University of Tampere the new regional government has been marginalised by the tensions built into it during the rescaling process. The Kainuu experiment exemplifies a case of rescaling where some Anni Jäntti (political) tensions between two perspectives/factors, service and development, were School of Management, rescaled together with local government functions, reflecting the reformer’s problem that University of Tampere it is extremely difficult to achieve many different outcomes with one governance expedi- ent. Altering the scale of governance has consequences for political decision-making, power structures, institutions, and citizens. Rescaling through a restructuring of hierarchy may produce different outcomes -
Mihin Suuntaan Mennään Vuokra-Asuntomarkkinoilla?
Mihin suuntaan mennään vuokra-asuntomarkkinoilla? SIJOITUS INVEST 29.-30.11.2017 Tuomas Viljamaa Suomen Vuokranantajat ry. Koko Suomi data Vuokraovi.com yksityisilmoittajat neliövuokra vuosimuutos 01-06/2017 14,7 0,1 % 01-06/2016 14,7 yritysilmoittajat neliövuokra vuosimuutos 01-06/2017 15,3 4,3 % 01-06/2016 14,7 kaikki vapaarahoitteiset neliövuokra vuosimuutos 01-06/2017 15,3 4,0 % 01-06/2016 14,7 Asuntosijoittamisen alueelliset tuotot 2017-2021 PTT ja Suomen Vuokranantajat Vuokratuoton laskeminen • Vuokratuotto ennen veroja lasketaan tässä tapauksessa näin: € 2 € 2 × 12 % = × 100 € 2 + € 2 + € 2 ⁄ − ⁄ 푀 ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ • Vuokratuotto lasketaan sitoutuneen pääoman sen hetkiselle markkina-arvolle. • Asunto hankitaan ilman lainaa ja varainsiirtovero asunto-osakkeista on 2 prosenttia. • Remonttivaraksi on oletettu PKS 700 €/m2, muut suuret kaupungit 500 €/m2, muu Suomi 400 €/m2. 5 Vuokratuotto ennen veroja 2017-2021, yksiöt Kajaani Pori Rauma Kotka Mikkeli Jyväskylä Kouvola Kehyskunnat Rovaniemi Kuopio Seinäjoki Kokkola Keskiarvo Lahti Vaasa Oulu Joensuu Tampere Turku Hämeenlinna Lappeenranta Vantaa Espoo-Kauniainen Porvoo Helsinki 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% vuosikasvu, keskimäärin 6 Arvonnousu 2017-2021, yksiöt Helsinki Kokkola Vaasa Espoo-Kauniainen Turku Tampere Vantaa Jyväskylä Kuopio Keskiarvo Lahti Seinäjoki Kehyskunnat Joensuu Hämeenlinna Porvoo Pori Mikkeli Rovaniemi Lappeenranta Kotka Kajaani Oulu Rauma Kouvola 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% vuosikasvu, keskimäärin 7 Keskimääräinen kokonaistuotto 2017-2021, yksiöt Kokkola Vaasa Helsinki Jyväskylä -
Societal Transformation Affecting the Visibility of Architecture in Finnish Defense Forces 1917-2017
SOCIETAL TRANSFORMATION AFFECTING THE VISIBILITY OF ARCHITECTURE IN FINNISH DEFENSE FORCES 1917-2017 Master’s Thesis // Architecture Aalto univeristy // School of Arts, Design and Architcture 2018 // 91 pages 2 3 4 21 michel foucault’s take on power 24 power-knowledge in built environment 30 power as socially negotiated environment 30 architecture as a functional background 32 architecture as visual signs 35 architect constructing power 5 39 Building white Finland (1917-1950) 41 Töölö car-company garrison 42 Niinisalo Lamella barrack 44 Santahamina Military Academy 47 Säkylä garrison 50 Vekaranjärvi garrison 51 Santahamina-House 53 Military architecture inside Finnish society 54 Architecture as a representation of Finnish Defense Forces 56 Functionality and appearance 6 59 Change in lifestyle 61 Transformation of media 62 People substituting buildings in media and entertainment 64 Foucault’s principles in current societal reality 66 Possible critique 68 Action plan 70 In terms of a user 71 In terms of an architect 74 In terms of the Finnish Defense Forces 75 In terms of architecture 76 In terms of society 7 Tässä työssä käsitellään Suomen Puolustusvoimien yhteiskunnallisen val- ta-aseman muutosta sotilasarkkitehtuurin näkyvyyden funktiona välillä 1917-2017. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on osoittaa, kuinka arkkitehtuuri ja sen senhetkinen näkyvyys vaikuttavat instituution kansalliseen valta- asemaan. Keskeisimpiä tutkimuskysymyksiä ovat (1) Kuinka arkkitehtuuri vaikuttaa instituution valta-asemaan yhteiskunnallisesti ja mikä on arkki- tehtuurin -
Helsinki – Joensuu/ Jyväskylä/ Kajaani/ Kemi/ Kokkola APPENDIX 8
Helsinki – Joensuu/ Jyväskylä/ Kajaani/ Kemi/ Kokkola APPENDIX 8 TRAFICOM/535299/02.03.01/2020 AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITMENT Airlines in Europe have developed the Airline Passenger Service Commitment following consultation with representatives of air travellers, European governments and the European Commission. Strong competition between airlines has provided Europe’s air travellers with an increased choice of airline, airport, price and service. The Airline Passenger Service Commitment contains non- legally binding commitments to deliver defined standards of service to air travellers. The code covers 14 areas: services provided before travel, during travel and after travel. It describes the level of service air travellers may expect consistently from signatory airlines. It will enable air travellers to make a more informed choice of airline when planning their travel arrangements. The airlines that are signatories to this Airline Passenger Service Commitment will continue to compete vigorously to meet the needs of customers by offering different products and different levels of customer service. They will endeavour to achieve the standards set out in this Airline Passenger Service Commitment on the most consistent basis possible. Signatory airlines will each develop their own individual service plans incorporating the Airline Passenger Service Commitment. Signatory airlines will establish staff training programmes and introduce changes to their computer systems to better implement the Airline Passenger Service Commitment. During this implementation period, some elements of the Airline Passenger Service Commitment may not be delivered by every airline. Signatory airlines agree to: 1. Offer the lowest fare available through each of its direct outlets a) Each airline will offer the lowest appropriate fare available for which the passenger is eligible through its own telephone reservation system, through its own website and through its own ticket offices for the date, flight and class of service requested. -
POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For
POKAT 2021 North Karelia’s Regional Strategic Programme for 2018–2021 Contents Foreword The regional strategic programme is a statutory regional devel- Sustainable Foreword 3 AIKO opment programme that must be taken into consideration by European growth and jobs Regonal Current state of North Karelia 6 the authorities. It states the regional development objectives, Territorial 2014-2020, innovations and which are based on the characteristics and opportunities spe- Cooperation structural fund experiments Focus areas of the Regional Strategic Programme 8 cific to the region in question. The programme is drawn up for a Programmes programme (Interreg) ”Small” 1. Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and operating environment 8 four-year period. The POKAT 2021 North Karelia Regional Stra- tegic Programme is for the period 2018–2021. regional policy Accessibility, transport routes and connections 8 National and international networks 8 The regional strategic programme describes and consolidates CBC programmes EU, national, supraregional and regional level strategies as well (external border) 2. Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and job-friendly economic structure 10 as the municipal and local level strategies. Despite the multi- Europe 2020 Strategy, Forest bioeconomy 10 sectoral overall approach, the aim is for the programme to have White Paper on the Future ”Large” specific focus areas. Concrete measures are described in the ac- of Europe 2025, 7th cohesion regional policy Technology industries 10 tion plan of the strategic programme and in individual sectoral report, EU Strategy for National objectives for Stone processing and mining 10 strategies and action plans. Separate EU the Baltic Sea Region, regional development Tourism 11 POKAT 2021 is the North Karelia Regional Strategic Programme programmes for the 2018–2021 period. -
Valtatie 22 Oulu - Kajaani - Vartius 17.5.2021
Suunnittelukohde Hankekortti päivitetty Valtatie 22 Oulu - Kajaani - Vartius 17.5.2021 Valtatie 22 Oulu - Kajaani on osa poikittaista kansain- • Vt 22, mt 18684 ja mt 8672 liikennejärjestelyt välillä Juu- välistä tieyhteyttä aina Ruotsista Haaparannan ja Var- russuontie - Pikkarala (vaihe 2), Oulu tiuksen raja-aseman kautta Venäjälle. Ohituskaistoilla • Vt 22 Pikkaralan (Oulu), Viskaalinmäen (Muhos), Hyrkäs parannetaan valtatien liikenteen sujuvuutta ja turval- – Sotkajärvi (Muhos) ja Kivesvaaran (Paltamo) keskikai- lisuutta, lisätään ohitusmahdollisuuksia ja lyhenne- teelliset ohituskaistat. tään yhteysvälin matka-aikoja. Tien leventämisellä nostetaan yhteysvälin laatutasoa. Liittymä- ja kevyen • Vt 22 Korivaara-Rovastinoja ja Honkala – Hyrkäs liikenne- liikenteen järjestelyillä parannetaan liikenteen toimi- järjestelyt (vaiheet 2), Muhos. vuutta ja liikenneturvallisuutta taajamien kohdilla. • Vt 22 / mt 800 Vaalan pääliittymän kanavointi ja pohja- vesisuojaus. NYKYTILA • Vt 22 leventäminen metrillä välillä Utajärvi – Vaala ja vä- Valtatie 22 yhdistää Kainuun ja Pohjois-Pohjanmaan maakun- lillä Vaala – Paltamo. takeskukset Oulun ja Kajaanin. Tie on valtakunnallinen mat- • Vt 22 välillä kt 78-mt19077 sekä Metelin ja Mieslahden kailutie (Tervantie). Tiellä on tärkeä merkitys kuntien elinvoi- kevyen liikenteen järjestelyt, Paltamo. maisuudelle sekä alueen yritysten toimintaan ja kilpailuky- • Vt 22 / Mt 19083, Tololanmäen liittymän parantaminen, kyyn. Yhteys on merkittävä myös tavaraliikenteelle, josta osa Paltamo. kulkee rataverkolla. -
Jaakko Helminen Finnish Meteorological Institute PO Box 503
FINNISH LOCAL V IEW ON THE FACTORS ACCOUNTING FOR THE COSTS OF W EATHER-RELATED DISASTERS (SPECIFICALLY, FLOODS AND STORMS) IN RECENT DECADES AND IMPLICATIONS OF UNDERSTANDING THESE FOR BOTH RESEARCH AND POLICY Jaakko Helminen Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland email: [email protected] 1. Introduction s the factors accounting for the costs of weather-related disasters (specifically, floods and storms) in recent decades and the implications of understanding these for both research and policy are considered in the Finnish context. The climatology of the pertinent weather phenomena are discussed also with some A outlook to the scenarios. Here some possible future shifts in both flood and storm types causing damages and losses are pointed out. In addition some policy issues are discussed as this seems to be another pertinent point. 2. Factors in weather-related disasters 2.1 Floods Since 1960 (Puupponen, 2006) in terms of house damage costs the three most severe flood episodes in Finland have occurred as follows. Spring 1966 – Southern Finland: This spring flood has been since 1969 the highest flood in the rivers of Southern Finland. The water equivalent of the snow at the beginning of April was still widely 200 – 250 mm which was roughly double compared with the normal value and in fact a record value. The melting of the snow was postponed to a late time point around 1 May. Consequently the recurrence value of the observed flood flows exceeded in several drainage basins 100 years in terms of a Gumbel distribution estimate. No exact damage data are available, but in relation to later damage inventories the probable cost level has been of the order of 10 million euros. -
MIT IPC Local Innovation Systems Working Paper 05-003
Strengthening the Research and Educational Basis for Regional Development in Less-Favored Regions Kati-Jasmin Kosonen MIT-IPC-LIS-05-003 The views expressed herein are the author’s responsibility and do not necessarily reflect those of the MIT Industrial Performance Center or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. University of Tampere Research Unit for Regional Development Studies Tampere – Seinäjoki Kati-Jasmin Kosonen, Researcher Research Unit for Urban and Regional Development Studies University of Tampere Sente • • • • • Strengthening the Research and Educational Basis for Regional Development in Less-Favored Regions A Local Innovation System Case Study Report March 2005 • • • • • E-mail: [email protected] www.sjoki.uta.fi/sente 1. Introduction In the era of knowledge-based economy the regional or local knowledge environment and innovation environments for specific business areas have become more important. In the knowledge-based economy the base of knowledge constantly evolves institutionally. The institutional evolvement actualizes itself by linking different kinds of knowledge-creation institutions to the knowledge-exploitation organizations and sub-systems through new kinds of knowledge-enhancing mechanisms, and mainly from R&D conducted in relation to regional capabilities (Cooke and Leydesdorff, 2004). Furthermore, new institutions are taking part in the local innovation networks, shaping the technological change and transformation in the region for the benefits of all parties, local businesses, universities or other higher education institutions and local/ national development authorities. If a region has only little formal and informal research and a few development institutions and particularly little interaction between them, actors find it more difficult to transform information (resources) into new knowledge and innovations. -
Ita-Suomi FI13 RIM Regional Innovation Report
Version: Final Date: 19 August 2011 Regional Innovation Monitor Regional Innovation Report (Eastern Finland/Itä-Suomi) To the European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Directorate D – Industrial Innovation and Mobility Industries Kimmo Viljamaa Henri Lahtinen Advansis www.technopolis-group.com PREFACE The Regional Innovation Monitor (RIM)1 is an initiative of the European Commission's Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry, which has the objective to describe and analyse innovation policy trends across EU regions. RIM analysis is based on methodologies developed in the context of the INNO-Policy Trendchart which covers innovation policies at national level as part of the PRO INNO Europe initiative. The overarching objective of this project is to enhance the competitiveness of European regions through increasing the effectiveness of their innovation policies and strategies. The specific objective of the RIM is to enhance the scope and quality of policy assessment by providing policy-makers, other innovation stakeholders with the analytical framework and tools for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of regional policies and regional innovation systems. RIM covers EU-20 Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. This means that RIM will not concentrate on Member States where the Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 1 and 2 levels are identical with the entire country (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), Malta which only has NUTS 3 regions, Slovenia which has a national innovation policy or Cyprus and Luxembourg which are countries without NUTS regions.