DOCSLIB.ORG

Regions of Eastern Finland (Summary)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regions of Eastern Finland (Summary) Summary of views on the 2nd Cohesion Report Regions of Eastern Finland, 27.8.2001 Regions of South Karelia, South Savo, Kainuu, North Karelia and North Savo Starting point: - The EU regional policy is important for the development of Eastern Finland regions. - During the period 1995-1999 Eastern Finland was covered by the Obj 6, 5b and Interreg II A programmes. Of these the Obj 6 programme area was defined in the Accession Treaty of Finland and Sweden on account of specific circumstances of sparse population. - In the present period until 2006 the South Savo, North Karelia, North Savo and Kainuu regions form an Obj 1 programme area. At the same time East Finland has an A support status according to Article 87.3 of the Treaty, allowing allocation of higher state aid. The region of South Karelia is covered by the Obj 2 programme. In addition there are two Interreg III A programmes implemented in the area. - The Eastern Finland regions consider that the additionality principle has not been followed in the implementation of the regional development programmes. - The Eastern Finland (NUTS II area) GDP has lowered by 2.3 % between 1995-1999 in comparison to the EU average, and by over 5 % in comparison to the national average. It is very likely that the GDP/capita of Eastern Finland will not exceed 75 % of EU15 average without (national) specific measures. Views on the future Cohesion Policy: - The enlargement and increase of territorial inequality means that sufficient structural policy resources are required to guarantee a stable regional development. It seems that the proposed 0.45 % of the GDP will not be enough in the enlarged Union. - The areas lagging behind should be the target of development also in the future Cohesion Policy. These areas need to be taken into account so that the eligibility criteria are defined for both the existing and the new Member States. Also unemployment and negative population trend should be taken into account in addition to the GDP criterion. - Specific treatment of the sparsely populated areas were taken into account in the Accession Treaty of Finland to the EU. Specific problems of these areas (sparse population, small size of population centres, periferic location, long distances, cold climate) are permanent disadvantages to the business and industry, and have impact on the development of the area. Sparse population should still be taken into consideration when the geographically problematic areas and areas with difficult nature conditions will be defined. Eastern Finland Objective 1 regions and Objective 2 regions bordering to Russia are examples of such areas. P:\Web debate site\1 Member States and Regions and Candidate Countries\Finland\Regions of 1 Eastern Finland-27.08.01-summary.EN.doc - Development of the external borders of the EU is important. Especially the eastern border should be brought forward stronger in the next Structural Fund period. At the same time compatibility of the EU and cross-border programmes with Russia should be emphasized so that the regions themselves have the decision-making powers over the implementation of their border programmes. - The present Structural Fund management should be simplified and developed. Local and regional decision-making should be emphasized more in future. Planning, implementation and decision-making of the development programmes should take place in the regions, under the leadership of the regional development authorities. P:\Web debate site\1 Member States and Regions and Candidate Countries\Finland\Regions of 2 Eastern Finland-27.08.01-summary.EN.doc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outokumpu Mining Case Study
    OUTOKUMPU MINING CASE STUDY Preliminary reflections 7 March 2019 1. Regional strengths of Outokumpu 2. Challenges for sustained growth 3. Policy options 4. Data appendix 2 1. Geographic location – proximity to Joensuu - 50 kilometres distance to Joensuu (average travel time of 40 minutes) and 40km to Joensuu airport (travel time 35 minutes) - 90 kilometres distance to Kuopio (average travel time of 75 minutes) - Less than 120 kilometres distance to the Russian border Population trend (1990 = 100) 120 Joensuu Outokumpu 115 110 Outokumpu is part of the largest labour 105 Regional population growth is concentrating market in North 100 in Joensuu Karelia (Joensuu). 95 90 85 80 75 2. A strong industrial sector and a high share of tradable activities Share of employed population by economic sector (2016) Finland Local labour Outokumpu market Agriculture, forestry and fishing (A) (T) 3% 8% 4% Public administration and defence, compulsory social security, 29% 32% 30% education and human health (O,P,Q) (NT) Construction (F) (NT) 7% 7% 6% Real estate (L) (NT) 1% 1% 1% Other services (R,S,T,U) (T) 5% 5% 5% Mining and quarrying, electricity and 1% 2% 4% water supply (B,D,E) (T) Manufacturing (C) (T) 13% 16% 24% Whole sale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food 21% 17% 14% services (G, H, I) (NT) Information and communication (J) (T) 4% 1% 1% Professional, scientific, technical and 13% 8% 10% administrative activities (M, N) (NT) Financial and insurance activities (K) (T) 2% 1% 1% • Outokumpu’s industry plays an instrumental role in the smart specialization strategy of North Karelia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU and NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND
    Policy Highlights OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU AND NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. About CFE The Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities helps local, regional and national governments unleash the potential of entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises, promote inclusive and sustainable regions and cities, boost local job creation and implement sound tourism policies. About this booklet This document summarizes the key findings of OECD (2019), OECD Mining case study: Outokumpu and North Karelia, OECD Publishing, Paris. The full publication will be available at http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/mining-regions-project.htm This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: ©Getyyimages, @Outokumpu Mining Museum For more information: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/ │ 1 Introduction This policy highlight provides a summary of the first OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study. The Case Study focuses on the region of North Karelia and the municipality of Outokumpu in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Semi-Natural Grasslands in the Province of South Karelia, SE Finland
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 181–186 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 24 September 1999 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1999 The status of semi-natural grasslands in the province of South Karelia, SE Finland Olli Marttila, Juha Jantunen & Kimmo Saarinen Marttila, O., Jantunen, J. & Saarinen, K., South Karelia Allergy and Environment Institute, Lääkäritie 15, FIN-55330 Tiuruniemi, Finland Received 21 December 1998, accepted 4 May 1999 Marttila, O., Jantunen, J. & Saarinen, K. 1999: The status of semi-natural grasslands in the province of South Karelia, SE Finland. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 181–186. The semi-natural grasslands were inventoried in the province of South Karelia (Fin- land) in 1992, 1993 and 1996. Altogether 89 different sites were found, covering a total area of 97 hectares. The sites were classified into five different biotopes, which com- prised a total of 115 grasslands. Three-quarters of all sites (68, 76%), covering an area of 65 hectares (67% of total), were assessed as being in danger of losing their value because of either poor management or lack of management. The results indicate that the area of semi-natural grasslands in the province is now about 250 times smaller (0.4%) than at the beginning of the 20th century. The status of these environments in South Karelia is alarming. Key words: agricultural management, grassland, grazing, mowing, pasture, semi-natural vegetation INTRODUCTION small patches on shores, mires, rocks and some larger areas on the fells in Lapland. The majority It is assumed that 30%–40% (400–500 species) of grasslands have resulted from agricultural man- of the Finnish flora has benefited from grazing agement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kainuu Regional Experiment
    SJPA The Kainuu regional experiment: deliberate and 19(4) unintended effects of scaling local government tasks to the regional level Arto Haveri, Jenni Airaksinen and Anni Jäntti* Abstract Arto Haveri This article examines the deliberate and unintended effects of the Kainuu Regional Exper- School of Management, iment, a regional reform where some important local government tasks were rescaled to University of Tampere the regional level. The analysis is based on the empirical results of a long-running evalua- [email protected] tion study. In Kainuu, the new regional government was successful in securing the quality Jenni Airaksinen and availability of welfare services, but in the task of regional development ‒ creating School of Management, new growth and development ‒ its role has been practically secondary, and in some cases University of Tampere the new regional government has been marginalised by the tensions built into it during the rescaling process. The Kainuu experiment exemplifies a case of rescaling where some Anni Jäntti (political) tensions between two perspectives/factors, service and development, were School of Management, rescaled together with local government functions, reflecting the reformer’s problem that University of Tampere it is extremely difficult to achieve many different outcomes with one governance expedi- ent. Altering the scale of governance has consequences for political decision-making, power structures, institutions, and citizens. Rescaling through a restructuring of hierarchy may produce different outcomes
    [Show full text]
  • North Karelia As a Mining Region Eira Varis Development Director North Karelia in a Nutshell
    North Karelia as a mining region Eira Varis Development director North Karelia in a nutshell Population 162 087 (2019) 13 municipalities, of which 5 towns Regional centre Joensuu Distance to Helsinki 450 km, one hour flight Distance to St Petersburg 407 km by train 89 % of land area covered by forests East and west meet 300 km frontier with Russia Over 1.2 million border crossings per year in Niirala Inland waterway connection through Saimaa canal to Russia and the Baltic Sea World-class knowledge hub Unique collaboration and expertise European Forest Institute – EFI HQ Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE) Finnish Forest Centre Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Business development: Business Joensuu, regional Business Development Organisations Educational institutions Educational institutions University of Eastern Finland – UEF Karelia University of Applied Sciences Riveria Vocational Education & Training Over 20 000 students in the region High-quality R&D and business • 6 000 companies, 33 000 employers, 5,7 billion € turnover • Top business areas: metal products, machinery, forest industry and technology, bioeconomy, plastics, mining, trade and services Mineral deposits of North Karelia 13.6.2019 Strenghts and weaknesses of North Karelia +++ --- Significant natural resources Ageing population structure World-class high level expertise High unemployment but also lack of (forest bioeconomy) skilled labour force Strong cooperation between Decline of infrastructure (roads) different actors Geographical handicaps: long Russia as
    [Show full text]
  • Between North Karelia, Finland, and Kaunas, Lithuania, from 1971 to 1987
    516 Br Heart J 1992;68:516-23 EPIDEMIOLOGY Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.68.11.516 on 1 November 1992. Downloaded from Comparison of trends in ischaemic heart disease between North Karelia, Finland, and Kaunas, Lithuania, from 1971 to 1987 Daiva Rastenyte, Veikko Salomaa, Harri Mustaniemi, Dalia Rasteniene, Regina Grazuleviciene, Zygimantas Cepaitis, Jari Kankaanpaa, Kari Kuulasmaa, Jorma Torppa, Juozas Bluzhas, Jaakko Tuomilehto Abstract Conclusions-Despite the remarkable Objective-To compare the long-term decline in the occurrence of ischaemic trends in mortality and attack rate of heart disease, it still remains the most ischaemic heart disease in North Karelia, important cause of premature mortality Finland, and in Kaunas, Lithuania, from in North Karelia. In Kaunas ischaemic 1971 to 1987. heart disease mortality and attack rate Design-Data on routine mortality increased in men. Experiences from suc- statistics were obtained from the Central cessful cardiovascular disease prevention Statistical Office of Finland and from the programmes in western countries, such Central City Archives of Kaunas. In ad- as the North Karelia Project, should be dition, data from the community based exploited to prevent an increasing myocardial infarction registers were epidemic of ischaemic heart disease in used. The registers used similar diagnos- eastern Europe. tic criteria and had operated in both areas during the entire study period. (Br Heart J 1992;68:516-23) Setting-The province ofNorth Karelia in Finland and the city of Kaunas in During the late 1950s and the early 1960s Lithuania. several western countries, including Finland, http://heart.bmj.com/ Subjects-The target populations were experienced a considerable increase in mor- the people of North Karelia and Kaunas tality and morbidity from ischaemic heart dis- aged 35-64 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Karelia Project in Finland
    ISSUE 5 · MARCH 2013 In this issue The North Karelia Project in Finland: A portrait of the North Karelia Project, the A societal shift favouring healthy lifestyles basis for community programs in chronic 2 disease prevention. In the early 1970s, the coronary heart disease mortality rate in Finland was the highest in the world, and North Karelia was the most affected. In every family in the region, physically active men in their prime were dying And answers to the following prematurely. questions The goal of the North Karelia Project was to reverse the situation by changing the population’s lifestyles. The goal was successfully attained: in 35 years, • What were the project’s goals? death by coronary heart disease in the North Karelia population dropped • What actions were taken in this context, and 85%. To this day, the project still serves as a model in promoting healthy what results were obtained? lifestyles.(1) • What were the details surrounding the community mobilization that contributed to the project’s success? • Is the success of the North Karelia Project transferable? What is TOPO? The TOPO collection is produced by the multidisciplinary team on nutrition, physical activity, and weight-related problems prevention (Nutrition, activité physique et prévention des problèmes reliés au poids or NAPP)1 at the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). The collection disseminates knowledge to inform the choices of practitioners and decision makers in the prevention North Karelia is a region of Finland with a population of 166 000 spread over an area of 21 585 km2. Traditionally of weight-related problems.
    [Show full text]
  • POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For
    POKAT 2021 North Karelia’s Regional Strategic Programme for 2018–2021 Contents Foreword The regional strategic programme is a statutory regional devel- Sustainable Foreword 3 AIKO opment programme that must be taken into consideration by European growth and jobs Regonal Current state of North Karelia 6 the authorities. It states the regional development objectives, Territorial 2014-2020, innovations and which are based on the characteristics and opportunities spe- Cooperation structural fund experiments Focus areas of the Regional Strategic Programme 8 cific to the region in question. The programme is drawn up for a Programmes programme (Interreg) ”Small” 1. Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and operating environment 8 four-year period. The POKAT 2021 North Karelia Regional Stra- tegic Programme is for the period 2018–2021. regional policy Accessibility, transport routes and connections 8 National and international networks 8 The regional strategic programme describes and consolidates CBC programmes EU, national, supraregional and regional level strategies as well (external border) 2. Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and job-friendly economic structure 10 as the municipal and local level strategies. Despite the multi- Europe 2020 Strategy, Forest bioeconomy 10 sectoral overall approach, the aim is for the programme to have White Paper on the Future ”Large” specific focus areas. Concrete measures are described in the ac- of Europe 2025, 7th cohesion regional policy Technology industries 10 tion plan of the strategic programme and in individual sectoral report, EU Strategy for National objectives for Stone processing and mining 10 strategies and action plans. Separate EU the Baltic Sea Region, regional development Tourism 11 POKAT 2021 is the North Karelia Regional Strategic Programme programmes for the 2018–2021 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Bulletin July 2021
    PIRKANMAA Employment Bulletin August 2021 PIRKANMAA August 2021 Unemployed jobseeker´s percentage of the workforce Unemployed jobseekers' percentage of the workforce by municipality Virrat 7,7 Kihniö 8,1 Parkano 8,5 Mänttä­Vilppula 8,7 Ruovesi 7,1 Ikaalinen Ylöjärvi 10,7 6,4 Juupajoki 6,1 Orivesi Hämeenkyrö Tampere 8,9 8,2 12,3 Kuhmoinen 11,1 Sastamala Nokia Kangasala 6,5 8,6 Pirkkala 8,0 6,8 Lempäälä Pälkäne Vesilahti 6,6 7,6 5,9 Valkeakoski 9,3 Akaa Punkalaidun 8,7 6,4 Urjala 9,8 5,0 ­ 9,9 (20) 10,0 ­ 14,9 (3) PIRKANMAA August 2021 Unemployed jobseekers UNEMPLOYED JOBSEEKERS MONTHLY AND TREND Pirkanmaa Persons 42 000 40 000 38 000 36 000 34 000 32 000 30 000 28 000 26 000 24 000 22 000 20 000 18 000 16 000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Pirkanmaa, Number of jobseekers on calculation date Trend UNEMPLOYED JOBSEEKERS, MONTH BY MONTH COMPARISON Pirkanmaa Persons 42 000 40 000 38 000 36 000 34 000 32 000 30 000 28 000 26 000 24 000 22 000 20 000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 2017 2020 2015 2018 2021 2016 2019 PIRKANMAA August 2021 Unemployed jobseekers by sub­regional unit UNEMPLOYED JOBSEEKERS by Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (ELY) Uusimaa Southwest Finland Satakunta Häme Pirkanmaa Southeast Finland South Savo North Savo North Karelia Central Finland South Ostrobothnia Ostrobothnia North Ostrobothnia Kainuu Lapland Åland 0 20 000 40 000 60 000 80 000 100 000 120 000 2020 August 2021 August Unemployed jobseekers and jobs vacant in Employment
    [Show full text]
  • Ita-Suomi FI13 RIM Regional Innovation Report
    Version: Final Date: 19 August 2011 Regional Innovation Monitor Regional Innovation Report (Eastern Finland/Itä-Suomi) To the European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Directorate D – Industrial Innovation and Mobility Industries Kimmo Viljamaa Henri Lahtinen Advansis www.technopolis-group.com PREFACE The Regional Innovation Monitor (RIM)1 is an initiative of the European Commission's Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry, which has the objective to describe and analyse innovation policy trends across EU regions. RIM analysis is based on methodologies developed in the context of the INNO-Policy Trendchart which covers innovation policies at national level as part of the PRO INNO Europe initiative. The overarching objective of this project is to enhance the competitiveness of European regions through increasing the effectiveness of their innovation policies and strategies. The specific objective of the RIM is to enhance the scope and quality of policy assessment by providing policy-makers, other innovation stakeholders with the analytical framework and tools for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of regional policies and regional innovation systems. RIM covers EU-20 Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. This means that RIM will not concentrate on Member States where the Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 1 and 2 levels are identical with the entire country (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), Malta which only has NUTS 3 regions, Slovenia which has a national innovation policy or Cyprus and Luxembourg which are countries without NUTS regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sosiaali- Ja Terveyspalvelut Satakunta HARJOITUS
    Sosiaali- ja terveyspalvelut Päätösten tueksi Päätösten satakunta Asiantuntija-arvio, syksy 2018 THL:n asiantuntijaryhmä 42 | 2018 HARJOITUS Sosiaali- ja terveyspalvelut Satakunta HARJOITUS THL:n asiantuntijaryhmä Sisällys Maakuntien seurannan ja arvioinnin vastuuhenkilönä on Maakunnan arvioinnin toiminut arviointijohtaja, professori Pekka Rissanen, arviointi- tausta ja toteutus 3 työtä on koordinoinut projektipäällikkö Kimmo Parhiala. 1. Keskeiset havainnot ja asiantuntija-arvio 4 Alueellisina arviointi­ Johanna Lammi-Taskula päällikköinä ovat toimineet: tutkimuspäällikkö 2. Maakunnan väestö ja lasten, nuorten ja Tiina Hetemaa toimintaympäristö perheiden palvelut Kainuu, Keski-Pohjanmaa, järjestämistehtävän Lappi, Pohjois-Pohjanmaa Jaana Suvisaari lähtökohtina 6 tutkimusprofessori Eija Rintala 3. Maakunnan mielenterveyspalvelut Etelä-Pohjanmaa, järjestämistehtävän Kanta-Häme, Pirkanmaa Tiina Hetemaa haltuunotto 8 arviointipäällikkö Nina Knape perusterveydenhuolto 4. Sosiaali- ja terveys- Etelä-Savo, Keski-Suomi, palvelujen rahoitus Pohjois-Karjala, Pohjois-Savo Airi Partanen ja kustannukset 11 kehittämispäällikkö Hannele Ridanpää päihdepalvelut 5. Tehtäväkokonaisuuksien Pohjanmaa, Satakunta, arviointi 15 Varsinais-Suomi Marina Merne-Grafström johtava ylihammaslääkäri, Jukka Kärkkäinen 5.1. Hyvinvoinnin ja Turku, suun terveydenhuolto Etelä-Karjala, Kymenlaakso, terveyden edistäminen 15 Uusimaa, Päijät-Häme Eeva Liukko 5.2. Erikoissairaanhoito 16 erityisasiantuntija työikäisten sosiaalipalvelut 5.3. Perusterveydenhuolto 19 tehtäväkokonaisuuksien
    [Show full text]
  • The Wolf Debate in Finland
    Ruralia Institute Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki The wolf debate in Finland Publications 12 The wolf debate in Finland Expectations and objectives for the management of the wolf population at regional and national level Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki Seinäjoki 2008 Publisher: University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute Kampusranta 9 FIN-60320 SEINÄJOKI Puh. +358 6 4213 300 Fax. +358 6 4213 301 ISBN 978-952-10-4135-8 (paperback) 978-952-10-4136-5 (pdf) ISSN 1796-0649 (paperback) 1796-0657 (pdf) Printed by Oy Fram Ab, Vaasa Foreword The wolf has returned to the Finnish countryside and once again there is no avoiding the fact that the interaction of man and wolf is an extremely painful one. Attitudes to the wolf divide Finns, and the wolf itself causes opinion to change fast once it has arrived in new areas. The wolf is a perpetual problem environmentally, something people have to live with on a daily basis. But what is the importance of social sustainability and how can protection of the wolf be reconciled with what local people see as a decline in the quality of life? How should the wolf issue be managed and who should act in what situation? These are the questions which have to be addressed in preparations for a national policy on wolves. Studies relating to policy on large carnivores for the University of Helsinki’s Institute for Rural Research and Training (Ruralia) represent a breakthrough, yet people in rural communities have always been at the centre of research. The sustainable use of natural resources is becoming more and more about socio-economic issues, with ecology obviously imposing its own set of condi- tions.
    [Show full text]