DOCSLIB.ORG

POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For POKAT 2021 North Karelia’s Regional Strategic Programme for 2018–2021 Contents Foreword The regional strategic programme is a statutory regional devel- Sustainable Foreword 3 AIKO opment programme that must be taken into consideration by European growth and jobs Regonal Current state of North Karelia 6 the authorities. It states the regional development objectives, Territorial 2014-2020, innovations and which are based on the characteristics and opportunities spe- Cooperation structural fund experiments Focus areas of the Regional Strategic Programme 8 cific to the region in question. The programme is drawn up for a Programmes programme (Interreg) ”Small” 1. Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and operating environment 8 four-year period. The POKAT 2021 North Karelia Regional Stra- tegic Programme is for the period 2018–2021. regional policy Accessibility, transport routes and connections 8 National and international networks 8 The regional strategic programme describes and consolidates CBC programmes EU, national, supraregional and regional level strategies as well (external border) 2. Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and job-friendly economic structure 10 as the municipal and local level strategies. Despite the multi- Europe 2020 Strategy, Forest bioeconomy 10 sectoral overall approach, the aim is for the programme to have White Paper on the Future ”Large” specific focus areas. Concrete measures are described in the ac- of Europe 2025, 7th cohesion regional policy Technology industries 10 tion plan of the strategic programme and in individual sectoral report, EU Strategy for National objectives for Stone processing and mining 10 strategies and action plans. Separate EU the Baltic Sea Region, regional development Tourism 11 POKAT 2021 is the North Karelia Regional Strategic Programme programmes for the 2018–2021 period. The programme’s vision propositions (direct EU funding) Arctic region’s joint Food 11 are: smart specialisation, an oil-free region and life-long partic- communication Central Smart Specialisation choices 12 ipation. The core of smart specialisation is formed by two inter- government national-level expertise areas for economic development: new block grants, 3. Well-being from partnerships 16 solutions in forest bioeconomy, and technologies and materi- infrastructure, investments Education and competence 16 als as drivers of growth. The region also has significant growth Rural Regional Well-being and inclusion 16 potential in mining and tourism. In terms of natural resources, development agriculture and food production play important roles. North Ka- fund strategic Culture, identity and creative industries 16 relia is aiming to become non-reliant on fossil fuels: the region seeks to be at the forefront of sustainable and resource-smart programme Action plan 4. Overarching themes 18 production and use of renewable energies. Life-long participa- (regional Regional strategy tion is about seeing the ageing population as an opportunity development The living environment 18 POKAT 2021 discussion) The specifics of urban and rural development 18 rather than just as a challenge. Resource wisdom 18 AREAS OF Security 19 Municipal and Supra-regional local strategies PROGRAMME strategies and and thematic thematic Regional programmes programmes strategies and WORK thematic programmes 3 The focus areas of the regional strategic Vision of the POKAT 2021 Programme programme are: • Smart Specialisation – Smart Growth: North Karelia invests • Oil free region – Sustainable Growth: Emerging bioecon- • Life-long participation – Inclusive Growth: Population age- • Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and The development of the operational environment and economic The specific characteristics of urban areas, suburban regions, in selected productive sectors. The goal is to increase re- omy and climate change consideration provide good op- ing is both a challenge and an opportunity for the region. By operating environment growth are aimed at supporting residents’ well-being – in other rural and sparsely populated areas are recognised and used gion´s enterprises’ international competitiveness portunities for resource efficient activities in North Karelia. activating people of different age groups the region wishes • Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and words, ensuring comfortable daily lives. Educational standards as the basis for development efforts. Housing and living envi- The objective to become a region that is free from fossil oil to be recognized as the home region of people of all ages job-friendly economic structure are high, and the necessary competence areas are supported ronments are pleasant and safe. The “resource wisdom” ap- is demanding but realistic • Well-being from partnerships – Comfortable living as needed. Welfare services are well-functioning, and citizens’ proach means using natural resources in a sustainable and active participation in welfare development is supported. North efficient manner and supporting circular economy. Security Vitality from regional networking means creating a competitive Karelian culture is valued, and the region has a strong identity. at various levels is part of citizens’ well-being and comfort- and highly appealing operating environment in North Karelia. It able living. These dimensions are ensured through partner- means good accessibility and well-functioning transport routes The regional strategic programme has four overarching themes: ships and cooperation. and connections. North Karelia is active in various national and • the “housing and living environment” theme highlights crit- Vision of the POKAT 2021 Programme international networks. ical issues related to the region’s appeal and profile, The regional strategic programme steers the use of EU funds • the “specifics of urban and rural development” theme en- and other resources allocated to the region. The annual lev- Growth from renewal means building a diverse, sustainable and sures that development within the region is well-balanced, el of funding is estimated to be approximately €170 million. job-friendly economic structure. Strengthening the competitive- • resource wisdom offers multisectoral opportunities, and, The POKAT 2021 Regional Strategic Programme 2018–2021 ness of local economy and businesses is the central element of • as a new theme, the programme highlights security as a was approved by the Regional Assembly in December 2017. this focus area. In particular, there is a strong focus on smart spe- broad-based concept. cialisation choices without forgetting the diversity of the eco- nomic structure. Smart Oil free Life-long Specialisation – region – participation – POKAT 2021 FOCUS AREAS Smart Growth Sustainable Growth Inclusive Growth Accessibility, Smart Education and transport routes specialisation competence and links choices North Karelia invests in Emerging bioeconomy and Population ageing is both VITALITY GROWTH selected productive sectors. climate change consideration a challenge and an opportunity FROM REGIONAL FROM RENEWAL Well-being The goal is to increase region´s provide good opportunities for for the region. By activating National and - DIVERSE, and inclusion WELL-BEING NETWORKING Economic international enterprises’ international resource effi cient activities in people of different age groups - A COMPETITIVE AND competitive- SUSTAINABLE FROM PARTNERSHIPS networks ATTRACTIVE OPERATING ness AND JOB-FRIENDLY - COMFORTABLE LIVING competitiveness North Karelia. The objective to the region wishes to be ENVIRONMENT ECONOMIC become a region that is free recognized as the home STRUCTURE Culture and from fossil oil is demanding region of people of identity but realistic all ages Specifi cs of The living Resource Overarching themes urban and rural Security development environment wisdom 4 5 Current state of North Karelia In the current decade, North Karelia has seen stronger econom- has turned. The activation service has 4,000–5,000 custom- although the 2016 growth figure, at 2.5%, was low compared of duty-free sales also began to grow late last year, and shop- ic development than the national average. The forecasts were ers on a continuous basis, which is equivalent to 6–7% of the with the 2015 figure (+8.6%). Nevertheless, the figure is bet- ping tourism from Russia is clearly increasing: in the first seven less favourable for a while, but improvement in the general eco- labour force. This means that the combined unemployment fig- ter than the national average (-0.1%) and the outlook is en- months of 2017 the change was +68%. nomic outlook has also led to increased confidence in the re- ure (unemployed job-seekers and those accessing services) was couraging. gion. For North Karelia, Finland’s economic growth is a positive around 18,000 at the end of 2016. The operational economy of local authorities in North Karelia as well as a potential cause for concern, as it can affect the re- Cuts in education funding in recent years have had a significant has been catching up with the national average in recent years. gion’s net population and availability of skilled workforce. There On the plus side, this means that when labour demand increases, impact in North Karelia, since education is an important sector The annual balance, an indicator of local authorities’ economic are already some signs of a weakened trend in internal migration. the region should have plenty of skilled workers to meet the de- for the region. On the other hand, the challenging funding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outokumpu Industrial Park
    Welcome to Outokumpu Industrial Park Juuso Hieta, CEO Outokumpu Industrial Park Ltd. Outokumpu Industrial Park (the core of it) Joensuu 45 km We are in this building at the moment Kuopio 92 km Sysmäjärvi industrial area Outokummun Metalli Oy Piippo Oy Mondo Minerals A Brief history of industrial evolution First stone chunck that gave evidence for Otto Trustedt’s exploration team of a rich copper ore deposit somewhere in North Karelia was found in 1910 about 70 km southeast from Outokumpu → ore discovery was the starting point of Outokumpu (both: company & town) Population vs. ore extraction – causality? Population now (~6800) What is left of our strong mining history? ”An Industrial hub” Outokumpu Industrial Park • A good example of Finnish regional (industrial) policy in the 1970’s • Outokumpu was one of many industrial cities in Finland to face such a major structural change with a very, very large scale on the local economy – many others followed → industrial park was established to broaden the local economy and to create new industrial jobs as a replacement for the declining mining business • Even as we speak we still have 15 hectares of already zoned areas for industrial purposes with a good and solid infrastructure: district heating of which 99 % is produced with renewable energy sources, optical fibre & electricity networks and modern sanitation systems easily accessible to all industrial and other start ups • Today (2018) about 960 jobs in industrial companies in Outokumpu, with 6800 inhabitants, which makes us one of the most
    [Show full text]
  • Joensuun Seudun Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma
    MEIJÄN KULTSU Joensuun seudun kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma Joel Ikonen: Näyttämö Ilomantsi – Joensuu – Juuka – Kontiolahti – Liperi – Outokumpu – Polvijärvi Sisällys Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelman laatiminen ..................................................................................... 1 Kulttuurikasvatus edistää oppimista ja luo hyvinvointia .................................................................. 2 Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelman arvopohja ...................................................................................... 3 Kulttuurikasvatus osana opetusta ja koulujen toimintaa ................................................................. 4 Vuosiluokkakohtaiset teemakokonaisuudet .................................................................................... 5 1.-2. lk. Mie kuvittelen ............................................................................................................. 5 3.-4. lk. Mie kerron................................................................................................................... 6 5.-6. lk. Mie ja muut ................................................................................................................. 7 7.-9. lk. Mie ajattelen ............................................................................................................... 8 KULTTUURIKASVATUSSUUNNITELMAN LAATIMINEN Meijän Kultsu -kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma on laadittu lukuvuoden 2018-2019 aikana. Työskentelyä varten koottiin työryhmä, johon kuuluivat kasvatuksen ja opetuksen seutukoordinaattori
    [Show full text]
  • 1(9) PÄÄTÖS Annettu Julkipanon Jälkeen Kaivnro: 11.4.2019 1852
    Turvallisuus- ja kemikaalivirasto 1(9) PÄÄTÖS Annettu julkipanon jälkeen KaivNro: 11.4.2019 1852 PÄÄTÖS KAIVOSLUVASSA ANNETTAVIEN YLEISTEN JA YKSITYISTEN ETUJEN TURVAAMISEKSI TARPEELLISISTA MÄÄRÄYKSISTÄ Kaivospiirin haltija Mondo Minerals B.V. Amsterdam Alankomaat Yhteystiedot: Mondo Minerals B.V. Branch Finland PL 603 87101 Kajaani puh. 010-56211 Kaivospiiri Vuonos (KaivNro 1852) Sijainti Outokumpu (kaivospiirin kartta on esitetty liitteessä 1) PÄÄTÖS Turvallisuus-ja kemikaalivirasto antaa Mondo Minerals B.V. :lle päätöksen kai- vosluvassa annettavien yleisten ja yksityisten etujen turvaamiseksi tarpeellisista määräyksistä koskien Vuonos -kaivospiiriä (KaivNro 1852). Perustelut: Kaivoslaki 52 §, 125 § ja 181 § Peruste määräysten tarkistamiselle Kuulemisen peruste: KHO päätös 22.11.2017 (Dnro 1217/1/16). Turvallisuus- ja kemikaalivirasto on päätöksellään 24.6.2014 antanut Vuonoksen kaivospiiriä koskien yleisten ja yksityisten etujen turvaamiseksi tarpeelliset mää­ räykset. Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeuden antaman päätöksen 21.3.2016 (nro 16/0079/3) mukaisesti päätöksen 24.6.2014 lupamääräys 3 on kumottu ja palautettu Turvalli­ suus-ja kemikaalivirastoon uudelleen käsiteltäväksi. Mondo Minerals B.V. valitti päätöksestä. KHO antoi päätöksen 22.11.2017 (Dnro 1217/1/16). Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisun mukaan Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeuden päätöstä ei muuteta. Turvallisuus-ja ke­ Helsinki Tampere Rovaniemi Vaihde 029 5052 00( mikaalivirasto PL 66 (Opastinsilta 12 B) Yliopistonkatu 38 Valtakatu 2 www.tukes.fi 00521 Helsinki 33100 Tampere 96100 Rovaniemi [email protected] Y-tunnus 1021277-9 2(9) KaivNro: 1852 Kaivosviranomainen kuulutti ja käsitteli uudelleen päätökseen 24.6.2014 liitty­ neen lupamääräyksen 3. Kuulemisen peruste on ollut kaivoslain (621/2011) 52.3 §, 108 § ja 109 §. Kaivosviranomaisen katselmus Vuonoksen kaivospiiriilä 22.5.2018 Kuulemisasiakirjassa esitettiin ote kaivosviranomaisen katselmuksesta Vuonoksen kaivospiiriilä 22.5.2018.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Environment Brought to You by CORE Provided by Helsingin Yliopiston445 Digitaalinen Arkisto the Finnish Eurowaternet
    445 View metadata, citation and similar papersThe at core.ac.uk Finnish Environment The Finnish Environment brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston445 digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Eurowaternet ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION Jorma Niemi, Pertti Heinonen, Sari Mitikka, Heidi Vuoristo, The Finnish Eurowaternet Olli-Pekka Pietiläinen, Markku Puupponen and Esa Rönkä (Eds.) with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies The Finnish Eurowaternet The European Environment Agency (EEA) has a political mandate from with information about Finnish water resources the EU Council of Ministers to deliver objective, reliable and comparable and monitoring strategies information on the environment at a European level. In 1998 EEA published Guidelines for the implementation of the EUROWATERNET monitoring network for inland waters. In every Member Country a monitoring network should be designed according to these Guidelines and put into operation. Together these national networks will form the EUROWATERNET monitoring network that will provide information on the quantity and quality of European inland waters. In the future they will be developed to meet the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. This publication presents the Finnish EUROWATERNET monitoring network put into operation from the first of January, 2000. It includes a total of 195 river sites, 253 lake sites and 74 hydrological baseline sites. Groundwater monitoring network will be developed later. In addition, information about Finnish water resources and current monitoring strategies is given. The publication is available in the internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe445/fe445.htm ISBN 952-11-0827-4 ISSN 1238-7312 EDITA Ltd. PL 800, 00043 EDITA Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Regions of Eastern Finland (Summary)
    Summary of views on the 2nd Cohesion Report Regions of Eastern Finland, 27.8.2001 Regions of South Karelia, South Savo, Kainuu, North Karelia and North Savo Starting point: - The EU regional policy is important for the development of Eastern Finland regions. - During the period 1995-1999 Eastern Finland was covered by the Obj 6, 5b and Interreg II A programmes. Of these the Obj 6 programme area was defined in the Accession Treaty of Finland and Sweden on account of specific circumstances of sparse population. - In the present period until 2006 the South Savo, North Karelia, North Savo and Kainuu regions form an Obj 1 programme area. At the same time East Finland has an A support status according to Article 87.3 of the Treaty, allowing allocation of higher state aid. The region of South Karelia is covered by the Obj 2 programme. In addition there are two Interreg III A programmes implemented in the area. - The Eastern Finland regions consider that the additionality principle has not been followed in the implementation of the regional development programmes. - The Eastern Finland (NUTS II area) GDP has lowered by 2.3 % between 1995-1999 in comparison to the EU average, and by over 5 % in comparison to the national average. It is very likely that the GDP/capita of Eastern Finland will not exceed 75 % of EU15 average without (national) specific measures. Views on the future Cohesion Policy: - The enlargement and increase of territorial inequality means that sufficient structural policy resources are required to guarantee a stable regional development. It seems that the proposed 0.45 % of the GDP will not be enough in the enlarged Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Koli National Park • Location: Joensuu, Kontiolahti, Lieksa • 30 Km2 • Established: 1991
    Koli National Park • Location: Joensuu, Kontiolahti, Lieksa • 30 km2 • Established: 1991 Metsähallitus, Parks and Wildlife Finland • Ukko Visitor Centre, Ylä-Kolintie, Koli, tel. + 358 (0)206 39 5654 [email protected] • nationalparks.fi/koli • facebook.com/ kolinkansallispuisto National Park Please help us to protect nature: • Please respect nature and other hikers! Koli • Leave no traces of your visit behind. Safely combustible wastes can be burnt at campfire sites. into one of Finland’s national Metsähallitus manages Please take any other wastes away landscapes. The best loved cultural landscapes within the when you leave the park. vistas open up vellous view over national park, at the same time Light campfires is allowed in the Lake Pielinen from the top of preserving traditional farming • sites provided in the camping When you take in the mar- Ukko-Koli hill, it’s easy to see methods. Swidden fields are areas marked on the map. Lighting vellous view over Lake why this spot has attracted so cleared and burnt in the park’s campfires is forbidden if the forest many Finnish artists, photog- forests, meadows are mown by Pielinen from the top of fire warning is in effect. Ukko-Koli hill, it’s easy to see raphers and nature-lovers over hand, and cattle graze the park’s • You may freely walk, ski and row, in why this spot has attracted the centuries. The splendid pastures. scenery always instills a sense of the park, except in restricted areas. so many Finnish artists, serenity and wonder in visitors. Hilltops and meadows • Please keep pets on lead.
    [Show full text]
  • R-Sarja Ntm 14 / 20.05.2013 (2018-08-30)
    R-sarja Ntm 14 / 20.05.2013 Tm/UfS/NtM 25. 10.9.2018 *274 /2018 (2018-09-10) Suomi. Vuoksen vesistö. Eno. Peltoniemi. Kaapelit ja johdot Finland. Vuoksens vattendrag. Eno. Peltoniemi. Kablar och rörledningar Finland. Vuoksi watercourse. Eno. Peltoniemi. Cables and pipelines Kartat / Kort / Charts Edellinen / Föregående / Previous R285, R285.1 262 /2018 Viite: TM 28/305/2012 Referens: UfS 28/305/2012 Reference: NtM 28/305/2012 2 R285, R285.1 Muuta Seuraavien pisteiden välillä: (1) 62°56.37'N 30°05.05'E Ändra > Mellan följande positioner: (2) 62°56.88'N 30°05.70'E Amend Between the following positions: ( FTA, Lappeenranta/Villmanstrand 2018 ) Tm/UfS/NtM 24 31.08.2018 *262 /2018 (2018-08-30) Suomi. Vuoksen vesistö. Eno. Kaltimonkoski. Kaapelit ja johdot Finland. Vuoksens vattendrag. Eno. Kaltimonkoski. Kablar och rörledningar Finland. Vuoksi watercourse. Eno. Kaltimonkoski. Cables and pipelines Kartat / Kort / Charts Edellinen / Föregående / Previous R/INDEX, R278 34 /2018 1 R/INDEX, R278 (1) 62°47.689'N 30°07.078'E Lisää Seuraavien pisteiden välille: (2) 62°47.662'N 30°07.255'E Inför Mellan följande positioner: (3) 62°47.695'N 30°07.528'E Add Between the following positions: 2 Kuva viitteeksi, karttaotteet ei merikartan mittakaavassa / Bild för referens, kortutdrag inte i sjökortets skala / Image for reference, chart extracts not to scale of chart ( FTA, Lappeenranta/Villmanstrand 2018 ) Tm/UfS/NtM 4 10.02.2017 *34 /2018 (2018-02-08) Suomi. Vuoksen vesistö. Pielinen. Joensuu. Ahveninen-Suurselkä väylä (2.4 m). Poistettu matalikko. Syvyystiedot Finland. Vuoksens vattendrag. Pielisjärvi. Joensuu. Farleden Ahveninen-Suurselkä (2.4 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Lasten Ja Nuorten Hyvinvointisuunnitelma 2019 2022
    Lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelma 2019─2022 Kunnanhallitus 3.12.2018 § 247 Valtuusto 17.12.2018 § 82 Ilman hulluja unelmia ei synny viisaita päätöksiä. Tommy Tabermann Sisältö 1. Johdanto .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Suunnitelmaa ohjaavat arvot, lait ja asiakirjat .......................................................................................... 2 2.1. Keskeiset lait ja asetukset .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Kuntastrategia ja muut ohjaavat asiakirjat........................................................................................ 3 2.3. Edellisen suunnitelman arviointi ....................................................................................................... 5 2.4. Lapsivaikutusten arviointi .................................................................................................................. 7 3. Lasten ja nuorten hyvinvoinnin nykytila .................................................................................................... 8 3.1. Väestö ja asuminen ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.2. Terveys, kehitys ja oppiminen ......................................................................................................... 13 3.3. Fyysinen kasvuympäristö ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outokumpu Mining Case Study
    OUTOKUMPU MINING CASE STUDY Preliminary reflections 7 March 2019 1. Regional strengths of Outokumpu 2. Challenges for sustained growth 3. Policy options 4. Data appendix 2 1. Geographic location – proximity to Joensuu - 50 kilometres distance to Joensuu (average travel time of 40 minutes) and 40km to Joensuu airport (travel time 35 minutes) - 90 kilometres distance to Kuopio (average travel time of 75 minutes) - Less than 120 kilometres distance to the Russian border Population trend (1990 = 100) 120 Joensuu Outokumpu 115 110 Outokumpu is part of the largest labour 105 Regional population growth is concentrating market in North 100 in Joensuu Karelia (Joensuu). 95 90 85 80 75 2. A strong industrial sector and a high share of tradable activities Share of employed population by economic sector (2016) Finland Local labour Outokumpu market Agriculture, forestry and fishing (A) (T) 3% 8% 4% Public administration and defence, compulsory social security, 29% 32% 30% education and human health (O,P,Q) (NT) Construction (F) (NT) 7% 7% 6% Real estate (L) (NT) 1% 1% 1% Other services (R,S,T,U) (T) 5% 5% 5% Mining and quarrying, electricity and 1% 2% 4% water supply (B,D,E) (T) Manufacturing (C) (T) 13% 16% 24% Whole sale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food 21% 17% 14% services (G, H, I) (NT) Information and communication (J) (T) 4% 1% 1% Professional, scientific, technical and 13% 8% 10% administrative activities (M, N) (NT) Financial and insurance activities (K) (T) 2% 1% 1% • Outokumpu’s industry plays an instrumental role in the smart specialization strategy of North Karelia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pohjois-Karjalan Pelastuslaitos-Liikelaitos Pelastustoimen Palvelutasopäätös 01.01.2021
    POHJOIS-KARJALAN PELASTUSLAITOS-LIIKELAITOS PELASTUSTOIMEN PALVELUTASOPÄÄTÖS 01.01.2021 - 31.12.2024 HYVÄKSYTTY Siun sote - Pohjois-Karjalan sosiaali- ja terveyspalvelujen kuntayhtymä Yhtymävaltuusto xx.xx.2020 Palvelutasopäätös lausuntoversio 2 (77) 12.6.2020 SISÄLTÖ 1. YLEISTÄ ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Lainsäädäntö ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Pelastustoimen järjestäminen ja tuottaminen Pohjois-Karjalassa .............................................................. 6 1.3 Strategiset tavoitteet ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Palvelutasopäätösprosessi ............................................................................................................................... 9 2. PALVELUTASOPÄÄTÖKSEN PERUSTEET.......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Toimintaympäristön kuvaus ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Meneillään olevan palvelutasokauden arviointi .......................................................................................... 13 2.3 Pelastustehtävämäärän kehitys ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU and NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND
    Policy Highlights OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU AND NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. About CFE The Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities helps local, regional and national governments unleash the potential of entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises, promote inclusive and sustainable regions and cities, boost local job creation and implement sound tourism policies. About this booklet This document summarizes the key findings of OECD (2019), OECD Mining case study: Outokumpu and North Karelia, OECD Publishing, Paris. The full publication will be available at http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/mining-regions-project.htm This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: ©Getyyimages, @Outokumpu Mining Museum For more information: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/ │ 1 Introduction This policy highlight provides a summary of the first OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study. The Case Study focuses on the region of North Karelia and the municipality of Outokumpu in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Sm–Nd and U–Pb Isotope Geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic Mafic Magmatism in Eastern and Northern Finland
    Geological Survey of Finland GeologicalGeological SurveySurvey ofof FinlandFinland 2018 Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland Hannu Huhma, Eero Hanski, Asko Kontinen, Jouni Vuollo, Irmeli Mänttäri and Yann Lahaye Bulletin 405 • Monograph Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin The Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Finland publishes the results of scientific research that is thematically or geographically connected to Finnish or Fennoscandian geology, or otherwise related to research and innovation at GTK. Articles by researchers outside GTK are also welcome. All manuscripts are peer reviewed. Editorial Board Prof. Pekka Nurmi, GTK, Chair Dr Stefan Bergman, SGU Dr Asko Käpyaho, GTK Dr Antti Ojala, GTK Dr Timo Tarvainen, GTK, Scientific Editor Instructions for authors available from the Scientific Editor. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF FINLAND Bulletin 405 Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland by Hannu Huhma, Eero Hanski, Asko Kontinen, Jouni Vuollo, Irmeli Mänttäri and Yann Lahaye Unless otherwise indicated, the figures have been prepared by the authors of the publication. Layout: Elvi Turtiainen Oy Espoo 2018 Huhma, H.1) , Hanski, E.2), Kontinen, A.3), Vuollo, J.4), Mänttäri, I.1) & Lahaye, Y.1) 2018. Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 405, 150 pages, 128 figures, 1 table and 11 appendices. The extensive isotopic studies performed at the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) since the early 1970s have shown that mafic magmas in the Karelia province of the Fennoscandian Shield were emplaced in several stages, including ca.
    [Show full text]