Sm–Nd and U–Pb Isotope Geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic Mafic Magmatism in Eastern and Northern Finland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sm–Nd and U–Pb Isotope Geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic Mafic Magmatism in Eastern and Northern Finland Geological Survey of Finland GeologicalGeological SurveySurvey ofof FinlandFinland 2018 Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland Hannu Huhma, Eero Hanski, Asko Kontinen, Jouni Vuollo, Irmeli Mänttäri and Yann Lahaye Bulletin 405 • Monograph Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin The Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Finland publishes the results of scientific research that is thematically or geographically connected to Finnish or Fennoscandian geology, or otherwise related to research and innovation at GTK. Articles by researchers outside GTK are also welcome. All manuscripts are peer reviewed. Editorial Board Prof. Pekka Nurmi, GTK, Chair Dr Stefan Bergman, SGU Dr Asko Käpyaho, GTK Dr Antti Ojala, GTK Dr Timo Tarvainen, GTK, Scientific Editor Instructions for authors available from the Scientific Editor. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF FINLAND Bulletin 405 Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland by Hannu Huhma, Eero Hanski, Asko Kontinen, Jouni Vuollo, Irmeli Mänttäri and Yann Lahaye Unless otherwise indicated, the figures have been prepared by the authors of the publication. Layout: Elvi Turtiainen Oy Espoo 2018 Huhma, H.1) , Hanski, E.2), Kontinen, A.3), Vuollo, J.4), Mänttäri, I.1) & Lahaye, Y.1) 2018. Sm–Nd and U–Pb isotope geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic mafic magmatism in eastern and northern Finland. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 405, 150 pages, 128 figures, 1 table and 11 appendices. The extensive isotopic studies performed at the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) since the early 1970s have shown that mafic magmas in the Karelia province of the Fennoscandian Shield were emplaced in several stages, including ca. 2.5 Ga, 2.44 Ga, 2.3 Ga, 2.22 Ga, 2.15 Ga, 2.12 Ga, 2.05 Ga, 2.0 Ga, 1.88 Ga and 1.78 Ga. Most of the rock associations formed during these events are related to episodes of shield-wide extension and rifting of the Archaean lithosphere and may be re- garded as examples of ancient large igneous provinces. The Sm–Nd whole-rock and mineral data produced by GTK on Palaeoproterozoic mafic rocks in the Karelia province consist of ca. 800 analyses from ca. 100 rock units. The Sm–Nd mineral ages from well-preserved samples are mostly consistent with the available U–Pb zircon ages and provide reliable estimates for the initial isotope composition of the rocks in question. These data, together with geochemical and other geological information, are used to constrain the age and origin of mafic magmas and the evolution of the lithosphere. The initial εNd values in the studied mafic rocks range from very positive to strongly negative and suggest that some of them were derived from a depleted mantle source, whereas others record a large contribution from old enriched lithosphere. Long-term mantle heterogeneity is evident from the isotopic data on high-REE mantle-derived rocks. Nearly chondritic initial εNd values were obtained from the 2.6 Ga Siilinjärvi carbonatite, the 2.0 Ga Jormua OIB and 1.8 Ga lamprophyres, whereas the 2.0 Ga Laivajoki and Kortejärvi carbonatites have yielded clearly posi- tive initial εNd values of +2.5. Further evidence for a depleted mantle source (by εNd = +4) is provided, for example, by the 2.0–2.1 Ga komatiites and some basalts in Lapland and 2.3 Ga dykes in eastern Finland. The positive εNd(T), particularly at 2.0–2.1 Ga, may indicate major attenuation of the lithosphere, which eventually allowed material from convective mantle to ascend uncontaminated to the surface. Deep-crustal contamination of ultramafic magma may explain many features of the studied mafic-ultramafic rocks, such as the 2.44 Ga layered intrusions with an εNd value of –2. Occasionally, contamination of country rock material at the final emplacement site of an intrusion may have been important, for example in the case of the 2.06 Ga Kevitsa mafic intrusion, showing an initialε Nd value from –3.4 to –6.4. The age and initial Nd isotope composition, together with other relevant infor- mation, provide tools for correlating dykes, intrusions and mafic extrusive units within the Fennoscandian Shield. The data are useful in constraining the ages of the Karelian lithostratigraphic units and their correlation. The results can also be used in correlating events between different cratons, particularly across the Atlantic to the Canadian Shield. Electronic appendices are available at http://tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/liiteaineisto/bt_405_ appendix_1_11.xlsx Electronic table is available at http://tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/liiteaineisto/bt_405_table_1. xlsx Keywords: Karelia Province, mafic magmas, gabbros, dykes, isotopes, absolute age, U/Pb, Sm/Nd, Proterozoic, Finland, Fennoscandian Shield 1) Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 96, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland 2) Oulu Mining School, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland 3) Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 1237, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland 4) Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 77, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-952-217-394-2 (PDF) ISSN 0367-522X (print) ISSN 2489-639X (online) 2 CONTENTS DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................................7 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2 ANALYTICAL METHODS ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Nd isotope analysis ...............................................................................................................................8 2.2 U–Pb isotope analysis ......................................................................................................................... 10 3 LAPLAND ......................................................................................................................................................12 3.1 Geological background ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.2 The 2.4–2.5 Ga intrusions in Lapland ............................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Tshokkoaivi intrusion .............................................................................................................16 3.2.2 Koitelainen intrusion and associated felsic volcanic rocks .................................................. 17 3.2.3 Peuratunturi and Koulumaoiva intrusions ............................................................................19 3.2.4 Lehtomaa intrusion ..................................................................................................................21 3.2.5 Onkamonlehto dyke ............................................................................................................... 22 3.3 The 2.22 Ga Palovaara intrusion ........................................................................................................24 3.4 The 2.15 Ga intrusions ........................................................................................................................25 3.4.1 Rantavaara intrusion ............................................................................................................... 25 3.4.2 Tanhua intrusions ................................................................................................................... 26 3.5 The 2.05 Ga intrusions ........................................................................................................................29 3.5.1 The Kevitsa intrusion .............................................................................................................. 29 3.5.2 Kevitsa dykes.............................................................................................................................32 3.5.3 The Moskuvaara intrusion ...................................................................................................... 34 3.5.4 The Puijärvi and Satovaara intrusions ...................................................................................35 3.6 The 2.0 Ga intrusions in Kittilä..........................................................................................................36 3.7 The 1.8 Ga Tainio and Lotto intrusions ............................................................................................ 40 3.7.1 Tainio intrusion ....................................................................................................................... 40 3.7.2 Lotto dyke ..................................................................................................................................41 3.8 Intrusions with unknown age ............................................................................................................ 41 3.8.1 Väkkärävaara intrusion ............................................................................................................41 3.8.2 Värriö intrusion ....................................................................................................................... 42 3.9 Volcanic rocks ......................................................................................................................................43
Recommended publications
  • Outokumpu Industrial Park
    Welcome to Outokumpu Industrial Park Juuso Hieta, CEO Outokumpu Industrial Park Ltd. Outokumpu Industrial Park (the core of it) Joensuu 45 km We are in this building at the moment Kuopio 92 km Sysmäjärvi industrial area Outokummun Metalli Oy Piippo Oy Mondo Minerals A Brief history of industrial evolution First stone chunck that gave evidence for Otto Trustedt’s exploration team of a rich copper ore deposit somewhere in North Karelia was found in 1910 about 70 km southeast from Outokumpu → ore discovery was the starting point of Outokumpu (both: company & town) Population vs. ore extraction – causality? Population now (~6800) What is left of our strong mining history? ”An Industrial hub” Outokumpu Industrial Park • A good example of Finnish regional (industrial) policy in the 1970’s • Outokumpu was one of many industrial cities in Finland to face such a major structural change with a very, very large scale on the local economy – many others followed → industrial park was established to broaden the local economy and to create new industrial jobs as a replacement for the declining mining business • Even as we speak we still have 15 hectares of already zoned areas for industrial purposes with a good and solid infrastructure: district heating of which 99 % is produced with renewable energy sources, optical fibre & electricity networks and modern sanitation systems easily accessible to all industrial and other start ups • Today (2018) about 960 jobs in industrial companies in Outokumpu, with 6800 inhabitants, which makes us one of the most
    [Show full text]
  • Joensuun Seudun Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma
    MEIJÄN KULTSU Joensuun seudun kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma Joel Ikonen: Näyttämö Ilomantsi – Joensuu – Juuka – Kontiolahti – Liperi – Outokumpu – Polvijärvi Sisällys Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelman laatiminen ..................................................................................... 1 Kulttuurikasvatus edistää oppimista ja luo hyvinvointia .................................................................. 2 Kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelman arvopohja ...................................................................................... 3 Kulttuurikasvatus osana opetusta ja koulujen toimintaa ................................................................. 4 Vuosiluokkakohtaiset teemakokonaisuudet .................................................................................... 5 1.-2. lk. Mie kuvittelen ............................................................................................................. 5 3.-4. lk. Mie kerron................................................................................................................... 6 5.-6. lk. Mie ja muut ................................................................................................................. 7 7.-9. lk. Mie ajattelen ............................................................................................................... 8 KULTTUURIKASVATUSSUUNNITELMAN LAATIMINEN Meijän Kultsu -kulttuurikasvatussuunnitelma on laadittu lukuvuoden 2018-2019 aikana. Työskentelyä varten koottiin työryhmä, johon kuuluivat kasvatuksen ja opetuksen seutukoordinaattori
    [Show full text]
  • From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland
    44 by David G. Gee1, Haakon Fossen2, Niels Henriksen3, and Anthony K. Higgins3 From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen Villavägen 16, Uppsala, SE-752 36, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 3 The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, Dk 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] The Caledonide Orogen in the Nordic countries is exposed in Norway, western Sweden, westernmost Fin- Introduction land, on Svalbard and in northeast Greenland. In the The Caledonide Orogen is preserved on both sides of the North mountains of western Scandinavia, the structure is dom- Atlantic Ocean, in the mountains of western Scandinavia and north- inated by E-vergent thrusts with allochthons derived eastern Greenland; it continues northwards from northern Norway, across the Barents Shelf and Svalbard to the edge of the Eurasian from the Baltoscandian platform and margin, from out- Basin (Figure 1). The orogen is notable for its thrust systems, board oceanic (Iapetus) terranes and with the highest E-vergent in Scandinavia and W-vergent in Greenland. The width of the orogen, prior to Cenozoic opening of the North Atlantic, was in thrust sheets having Laurentian affinities. The other the order of at least 700–800 km, the deformation fronts on both side of this bivergent orogen is well exposed in north- sides of the orogen being defined by thrusts that, in the Devonian, eastern Greenland, where W-vergent thrust sheets probably reached substantially further onto the foreland platforms than they do today.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkatach Hypothesis: a New Model for the Evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian Oceanic Domains
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains 1,2 2 GEOSPHERE, v. 13, no. 5 Andrew V. Zuza and An Yin 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA doi:10.1130/GES01463.1 18 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT suturing. (5) The closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean in the early Permian was accompanied by a widespread magmatic flare up, which may have been CORRESPONDENCE: avz5818@gmail .com; The Phanerozoic history of the Paleo-Asian, Tethyan, and Pacific oceanic related to the avalanche of the subducted oceanic slabs of the Paleo-Asian azuza@unr .edu domains is important for unraveling the tectonic evolution of the Eurasian Ocean across the 660 km phase boundary in the mantle. (6) The closure of the and Laurentian continents. The validity of existing models that account for Paleo-Tethys against the southern margin of Balkatach proceeded diachro- CITATION: Zuza, A.V., and Yin, A., 2017, Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the the development and closure of the Paleo-Asian and Tethyan Oceans criti- nously, from west to east, in the Triassic–Jurassic. Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains: cally depends on the assumed initial configuration and relative positions of Geosphere, v. 13, no. 5, p. 1664–1712, doi:10.1130 the Precambrian cratons that separate the two oceanic domains, including /GES01463.1. the North China, Tarim, Karakum, Turan, and southern Baltica cratons.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoproterozoic Metamorphic Evolution of the Isbjørnhamna
    Neoproterozoic metamorphic evolution of the Isbjørnhamna Group rocks from south-western Svalbardpor_186 250..264 Jaroslaw Majka,1 Jerzy Czerny,2 Stanislaw Mazur,3 Daniel K. Holm4 & Maciej Manecki2 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Mineralogy, Petrography and Geochemistry, AGH–University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Av., PL-30059 Kraków, Poland 3 GETECH, Kitson House, Elmete Hall, Elmete Lane, Leeds, LS8 2LJ, UK 4 Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA Keywords Abstract Caledonides; geothermobarometry; metapelites; Neoproterozoic; Spitsbergen. A metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary complex constitutes the Caledonian basement in the south-western part of Wedel Jarlsberg Land, Svalbard. Field, Correspondence textural and previous thermochronologic data indicate a weak, localized meta- Jaroslaw Majka, Department of Earth morphic Caledonian overprint (M2). Deformed M1 isograds and variation in Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, pressure–temperature estimates indicate a pervasive Neoproterozoic SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: amphibolite-facies metamorphism that pre-dates large-scale Caledonian age [email protected] folding. Garnet–biotite and garnet–Al silicate–plagioclase (GASP) geother- doi:10.1111/j.1751-8369.2010.00186.x mobarometry of the Isbjørnhamna Group mica schists, and their comparison with the K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O (KFMASH) petrogenetic grid, indi- cates a peak pressure of ca. 11 kbar, and a peak temperature of ca. 670°C during M1 metamorphism. A cooling rate of ca. 5°C My-1 is estimated on the basis of geothermobarometry and the available U–Th–total Pb and Ar–Ar data. Southern Wedel Jarlsberg Land (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • J-/S80C02S «^TU£V9—£2 STV K
    J-/S80C02S «^TU£v9—£2 STUK-A62 June 1987 RADIOACTIVITY OF GAME MEAT IN FINLAND AFTER THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT IN 1986 Supplement 7 to Annua! Report STUK A55 Airo R.mMvii.ir;). T'mt! Nytjrr-r K.t.ulo r-jytJr»• r•; ,iin! T,ip,ifi' f-K v ••••<-!• STV K - A - - 6 2. STUK-A62 June 1987 RADIOACTIVITY OF GAME MEAT IN FINLAND AFTER THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT IN 1986 Supplement 7 to Annual Report STUK-A55 Aino Rantavaara, Tuire Nygr6n*, Kaarlo Nygren* and Tapani Hyvönen * Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute Ahvenjärvi Game Research Station SF - 82950 Kuikkalampi Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety P.O.Box 268, SF-00101 HELSINKI FINLAND ISBN 951-47-0493-2 ISSN 0781-1705 VAPK Kampin VALTIMO Helsinki 1988 3 ABSTRACT Radioactive substances in game meat were studied in summer and early autumn 1986 by the Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety in cooperation with the Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute. The concentrations of radioactive cesium and other gamma-emitting nuclides were determined on meat of moose8 and other cervids and also on small game in various parts of the country before or in the beginning of the hunting season. The most important radionuclides found in the samples were 134Cs and 137Cs. In addition to these, 131I was detected in the first moose meat samples in the spring, and 110"Ag in a part of the waterfowl samples. None of them was significant as far as the dietary intake of radionuclides is concerned. The transfer of fallout radiocesium to game meat was most efficient in the case of the arctic hare and inland waterfowl; terrestrial game birds and the brown hare belonged to the same category as moose.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Education: Performances
    ANNE PEHKONEN VISUAL ARTIST CURRICULUM VITAE Address; Nivanlammintie 91 Email; [email protected] 82200 Hammaslahti www.environmentalart.net/stonefield Finland www.kuvataiteilijamatrikkeli.fi www.environmentalart.net www.koliartfestival.fi Phone; +358500629751 Art Education: 2003 Fine Art, B.A., North Karelia University of Applied Sciences, Joensuu, Finland. 2005 Documentary Film Production Studies, North Karelia University of Applied Sciences. 2002 Fine Art, State Academy of Art and Design, St. Petersburg, Russia. 1999 -2000 Art Therapy & Psychotherapy, University of Art and Design, Helsinki. 1992 -1993 Drawing, Vapaa Taidekoulu, Helsinki, Finland. 1976, 1992 Physiotherapy, Jyväskylä and Helsinki Performances 2017 - 2018 Snowball-open performance, St. Petersburg, Russia 2015 Performance Snowball in Village Niva, Joensuu, Finland 2014 Snowball- open performance : MoNA, http://www.mona.ee, Pärnu, Estonia 2013 Performance Snowball In Koli Environmental Art Festival, Koli Finland 2012 Performance Snowball: Vihtari, Joroinen, Puhos, Sulkava, Pankakoski, Finland Art Museum of Karelia, Petrosavodsk, Russia The Museum of Lieksa, Finland Vaasa, Finland 2011 Performance Snowball: Alajärvi, Finland ArtFair Suomi 11, Railway station, Helsinki, Finland Turku, Finland Tromso, Norway Oulu, Finland 2010 Performance Arctic fox, oneweekgallery, Eno, Finland Open Performance Snowball, Art Fair Suomi 10,Cable Factory, Helsinki, Finland Performance Snowball, Ars Sippola,Kouvola, Finland Performance Snowball-Art Today, Louhitalo, Eno, Finland 1
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage and Identity in NORTH KARELIA – FINLAND
    heritage and identity in NORTH KARELIA – FINLAND Diënne van der Burg University of Groningen/ University of Joensuu Faculty of Spatial Sciences/ Department of Geography April 2005 Heritage and Identity in North Karelia - Finland Diënne van der Burg Student number 1073176 Master’s thesis Cultural Geography April 2005 University of Groningen/ Faculty of Spatial Sciences/ Dr. P. D. Groote University of Joensuu/ Department of Geography/ Senior Assistant Professor Minna Piipponen Heritage and Identity in North Karelia 2 Abstract The region of North Karelia can be identified in different ways. Identity can be seen as the link between people, heritage and place. People want to identify themselves with a place, because for them that place has a special character. Many features distinguish places from each other and heritage is one of these features that contribute to the identity of a place and to the identification of individuals and groups within that specific place. Therefore heritage is an important contributor when people identify themselves with a place. Nowadays the interest in heritage and identity is strong in the context of processes of globalisation. Globalisation has resulted in openness and heterogeneousness in terms of place and culture. More and more, identities are being questioned and globalisation has caused nationalism and regionalism in which heritage is used to justify the construction of identities. Karelia North Karelia can be seen as part of Karelia as a whole. Karelia is situated partly in Finland and partly in Russia and that makes it a border area. Karelia is a social-cultural constructed area with no official boundaries. The shape, size and its inhabitants changed many times during the centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird-Routes-In-Lapland.Pdf
    Olli-Pekka Karlin Markus Varesvuo which is a particularly good gathering place for waders during ture for the walks: 7386462.460939, which includes Vianaapa (bird Blue Route (Tornionjoki River Route, Road E8) the spring migration period. Immediately after Niskanperä, tower, 7384330:461931). This site is provided with a fine network of Tarsiger cyanurus Tarsiger ) road no. 4 crosses Kuolajokisuu (2), another gathering place paths and lean-to shelters. The distance from Rovaniemi to this site is ( Bluetail Red-flanked The Tornionjoki River Route starts from the northernmost tip of for waders during the spring migration period. The numbers of approx. 20 km. This is a site where species such as Three-toed Woo- the Gulf of Bothnia from TORNIO and proceeds northwards along birds at Niskanperä and Kuolajokisuu is affected by the presence dpecker (Picoides tridactylus), Rustic Bunting (Emberiza rustica), along Road E8 to Skibotn in Norway. The sediment-filled Alkunkarinlah- of sediments, which are dependent on floods and the regula- with many typical wetland species, nest. In the winter, a fine site for ti Bay is at the mouth of Tornionjoki River, and it is a significant tion of the river. The delta of Ounasjoki River 1( ; Koivusaari observing White-throated Dipper (Cinclus cinclus) in its element along Snow Bunting (Plectrophenax nivalis) nesting and gathering place for aquatic birds. There are two bird floating bird tower: 7377852:4437201) is an area where 150 Raudanjoki River is east of the village of Vikajärvi and road no. 4. The towers and lean-to shelters at this location (S: 7297826:372844; bird species have been recorded, and about half of them nest easiest way to do this is from the bridge on the road joining Vikajärvi N: 7298321:372614).
    [Show full text]
  • POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For
    POKAT 2021 North Karelia’s Regional Strategic Programme for 2018–2021 Contents Foreword The regional strategic programme is a statutory regional devel- Sustainable Foreword 3 AIKO opment programme that must be taken into consideration by European growth and jobs Regonal Current state of North Karelia 6 the authorities. It states the regional development objectives, Territorial 2014-2020, innovations and which are based on the characteristics and opportunities spe- Cooperation structural fund experiments Focus areas of the Regional Strategic Programme 8 cific to the region in question. The programme is drawn up for a Programmes programme (Interreg) ”Small” 1. Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and operating environment 8 four-year period. The POKAT 2021 North Karelia Regional Stra- tegic Programme is for the period 2018–2021. regional policy Accessibility, transport routes and connections 8 National and international networks 8 The regional strategic programme describes and consolidates CBC programmes EU, national, supraregional and regional level strategies as well (external border) 2. Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and job-friendly economic structure 10 as the municipal and local level strategies. Despite the multi- Europe 2020 Strategy, Forest bioeconomy 10 sectoral overall approach, the aim is for the programme to have White Paper on the Future ”Large” specific focus areas. Concrete measures are described in the ac- of Europe 2025, 7th cohesion regional policy Technology industries 10 tion plan of the strategic programme and in individual sectoral report, EU Strategy for National objectives for Stone processing and mining 10 strategies and action plans. Separate EU the Baltic Sea Region, regional development Tourism 11 POKAT 2021 is the North Karelia Regional Strategic Programme programmes for the 2018–2021 period.
    [Show full text]
  • District 107 H.Pdf
    Club Health Assessment for District 107 H through July 2017 Status Membership Reports LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice No Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Active Activity Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Email ** Report *** Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no report When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater in 3 more than of officers that in 12 within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not have months two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active appears in in brackets in red in red red red indicated Email red Clubs less than two years old 126283 KITEE/KEISARINNA 12/28/2015 Active 25 0 0 0 0.00% 29 1 0 Clubs more than two years old 20696 ENO 01/29/1957 Active(1) 18 0 0 0 0.00% 18 2 2 1 30371 ENONKOSKI 03/06/1975 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 21 0 2 2 20697 HEINÄVESI 11/26/1963 Active 17 0 0 0 0.00% 16 2 4 45917 HEINÄVESI/KERMA 03/26/1986 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 21 5 5 20698 ILOMANTSI 10/19/1956 Active 29 0 0 0 0.00% 29 0 2 M 0 20699 ILOMANTSI/BRIHAT 02/04/1971 Active 24 0 0 0 0.00% 26 1 1 20700 JOENSUU 03/05/1955 Active 23 0 0 0 0.00% 26 1 1 51348 JOENSUU/ADAM & EVA 02/19/1991 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 18 1 1 20702 JOENSUU/CARELIAN 02/06/1958 Active 28 0 0 0 0.00% 26 1 1 33104 JOENSUU/JOKELAISET 12/14/1976 Active 33 0 0 0 0.00% 32 0 0 119420
    [Show full text]