DOCSLIB.ORG

Colloquium Spring 2018 Full

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colloquium Spring 2018 Full Venezuela in Crisis A Backgrounder By Jorge Mejía ’21 Tis essay provides a rigorous but readable background for arguably one of the most pressing geopolit- ical issues in twenty-frst century Latin America ‒ the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela under President Nicolás Maduro of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). To this end, this essay analyzes and connects three distinct political phenomena in Venezuelan history whose interrelated development explains the country’s current instability: Puntofjismo (1958-1998), Chavismo (1998-2013), and Mad- urismo (2013-present). It frst describes the collapse of Puntofjismo, Venezuela’s pacted democracy and oil-dependent petro-state to contextualize the rise of Hugo Chávez’s political project in 1990, Bolivarian- ism. Te paper then considers how Chávez’s regime continued and ruptured with Puntofjismo through clientelism, exclusionary politics, and the creation of an illiberal hybrid regime. Based of of these foun- dations, the essay situates the current student protests, military repression, and humanitarian crisis under President Maduro. Using both English and Spanish-language source material, this paper lays bare the current complex reality that is Venezuela. COLLOQUIUM Puntofijismo (1958-1998) Chavismo (1998-2013) Madurism 1958 1998 2013 - Present Moisés Naím, a Distinguished Fellow at the Venezuela’s transition from the military dicta- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, torship of Marco Pérez Jiménez to democracy states, “Today, Venezuela is the sick man of Lat- came in 1958 after representatives of Venezuela’s in America.”1 Te humanitarian crisis in Vene- three main political parties, Democratic Action zuela, under current President Nicolás Maduro (AD), the Social Christian Party (COPEI), and Moros of the United Socialist Party of Venezu- Democratic Republican Union (URD), signed ela, is arguably Latin America’s most pressing a formal agreement to accept the results of the issue in the twenty-frst century. Te country’s December 1958 presidential election of AD can- crisis, distinguished by food shortages, political didate, Rómulo Betancourt. Tis “Pacto de Pun- instability, hyperinfation, and other crises, has to Fijo” enshrined what political scientists term garnered the attention of observers worldwide, “consociational democracy,” a power-sharing ar- such as the European Union. Tis rediscovery of rangement whereby parties agree to alternate the Venezuela, however, does not imply that current presidency, respect election results, equally ap- circumstances were altogether unexpected. Tis portion government agency positions, and pre- paper analyzes and connects three distinct yet re- vent single-party hegemony.3 Puntofjismo also lated political phenomena in Venezuelan histo- afrmed petroleum’s dominance in the economy. ry: Puntofjismo (1958-1998), Chavismo (1998- Te Puntofjisto democracy had several im- 2013), and Madurismo (2013-present). Tis portant characteristics that contextualize the essay frst describes the collapse of Puntofjismo, subsequent erosion of Venezuelan democracy. Venezuela’s post-transition style of pacted de- Venezuelan history scholars underscore two spe- mocracy, or “partyarchy,” and its oil-dependent cifc qualities, the notion of the “petro-state” and petro-state, whose loss of popular support in the “partyarchy,” or pacted democracy. Terry Lynn 1980s coincided with the rise of Hugo Chávez’s Karl, author of the 1997 book, Te Paradox of political project known as Bolivarianism in the Plenty, defnes a petro-state as a distinctive type 1990s. Te paper then analyzes Chávez’s regime of institutional setting produced by an outsized and its continuation and rupture with Puntof- jismo through clientelism, exclusionary politics, and the creation of an illiberal hybrid regime. Following this analysis, the paper seeks to explain the complex realities of modern day Venezuela, including the current protests, military violence, and humanitarian crisis under Nicolás Maduro. Te modern day phenomena of Venezuela can frst be explained by the collapse of the public governance system from 1958 to 1998, Puntofjis- mo. Daniel Hellinger writes, “Most of the recent works on Venezuela concentrate on the collapse of the Punto Fijo system and on the character of Chavismo and the Bolivarian government.”2 PAGE 43 dependence on petroleum revenue.4 Petro-states directions in oil-rich states.9 In 1983, when oil like Venezuela, a member of the Organization of prices dwindled, the stability of these arrange- the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), are ments weakened as well. Several events followed noted for their extractive and distributive state that undermined the legitimacy of Puntofjismo. capacities. Strong reliance on non-productive Among these is the Caracazo, the Caracas-based and capital-intensive resources afects political ar- riots of February 27, 1989, which unfolded in re- rangements such as social classes, regime types, sponse to the government’s structural adjustment state institutions, and the decisions of policymak- program. Equally crucial were the attempted mil- ers. Regime type is especially subject to oil depen- itary coups of 1992 on February 4 and November dence due to the “symbiotic interaction between 27 led by military lieutenant Hugo Chavez fol- the…incentives created by the petro-state and a lowed by the impeachment of former President particular type of democracy.”5 Te latter hints at Carlos Andrés Pérez in December 1993, who “partyarchy,” a term coined by Michael Coppedge abandoned COPEI and later won on an anti-par- in his 1997 book, Strong Parties and Lame Ducks.6 ty platform. Levine explains the implications of Te title refers to Venezuela’s post-transition tra- these events for Venezuela’s Puntofjista democracy: dition of corporatist elite bargaining, intra-elite compromise, and economic conservatism in At each of these points a key pillar of the managing petroleum revenues and state-soci- system was undermined or removed: eco- ety relations.7 As Hellinger notes about AD and nomic strength (Black Friday); social COPEI’s talks at Punto Fijo, “Te issue was not pacts, control, and civil order (27 Febru- whether some type of system would be better… ary); a depoliticised and controlled mil- than democracy, but whether this particular de- itary (4 February and 27 November); and mocracy was delivering on the promise of ‘sowing unquestioned executive dominance and the oil’ in a project of national development that party hegemony (the destitution of Pérez would include all Venezuelans.”8 From 1958 to and the election of Caldera). Te nature 1979, Venezuela’s petro-state and pacted democ- of the crisis refects the dimensions of de- racy resulted in a system of consistent economic cline: economic decay, political ossifca- growth, strong political parties, and governability. tion and immobilism, and rising protest.10 Te erosion of government stability during the 1980s explains why Hugo Chávez’s ideol- Evidently, the 1980s issued a terminus to Venezu- ogy Bolivarianismo, or Bolivarianism, success- ela’s Puntofjista democracy. Te qualities of pet- fully channeled institutional anomie and social ro-state and pacted democracy, economic growth, demand into a revolutionary political platform. stability, governability, controlled organized so- In his 2002 article, “Te Decline and Fall of De- cial life, and military subordination to civilian mocracy in Venezuela,” Daniel Levine notes that rule, were no longer guaranteed. Factionalism, the synergy between the petro-state and pacted civil outcry, and polarization were underway. democracy reinforced certain systemic ills in Ven- Te collapse of Puntofjismo ran parallel with ezuela, such as corruption, truncated political the emergence of an alternative political project participation, corporatism, patronage, presiden- of special relevance to contemporary Venezuela, tialism, and bureaucratization. Tomas Friedman Hugo Chávez’s Bolivarianismo. Bolivarianism re- further captures these ideas in his famous “First fers to the political thought embodied in the mil- Law of Petropolitics,” which posits that the price itary movement called the Movimiento Revolu- of oil and the pace of freedom move in opposite cionario Bolivariano (MRB), which was involved COLLOQUIUM Venezuela’s systemic ills: corruption corporatism bureaucratization truncated patronage political participation presidentialism with the aforesaid coup d’état against President critique of Puntofjismo.16 Tis project critically Carlos Andrés Pérez in 1992. In his essay, “Ex- recognized civil society’s unifying plea for the plaining Political Change in Venezuela,” Pedro overhaul of Puntofjista democracy by linking the Sanoja observes, “Te ideas of Bolivarianism are Venezuela of 1830 with the Venezuela of 1990 derived from contradictions inherent to existing and drawing connections between the periods as institutions, and can only be understood in re- an unfnished Manichean struggle for freedom. lation to the values and practices embedded in In short, Chávez’s Bolivarian ideology during them, which Bolivarianism aimed to replace.”11 the 1990s made strategic use of anti-Puntof- Sanoja refers to the opportunities presented jista civil society demand. Ultimately, Bolivari- by the decay of the Puntofjista institutional or- anism and its repudiation of pacted democracy der, including the inability of AD and COPEI became institutionalized in December 1998, in the corporatist pre-Chávez institutional set- when Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías of the United ting to placate social
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro’S Cabinet Chair: Peter Derrah
    Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro’s Cabinet Chair: Peter Derrah 1 Table of Contents 3. Letter from Chair 4. Members of Committee 5. Committee Background A.Solving the Economic Crisis B.Solving the Presidential Crisis 2 Dear LYMUN delegates, Hi, my name is Peter Derrah and I am a senior at Lyons Township High School. I have done MUN for all my four years of high school, and I was a vice chair at the previous LYMUN conference. LYMUN is a well run conference and I hope that you all will have a good experience here. In this committee you all will be representing high level political figures in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, as you deal with an incomprehensible level of inflation and general economic collapse, as well as internal political disputes with opposition candidates, the National Assembly, and massive protests and general civil unrest. This should be a very interesting committee, as these ongoing issues are very serious, urgent, and have shaped geopolitics recently. I know a lot of these issues are extremely complex and so I suggest that you do enough research to have at least a basic understanding of them and solutions which could solve them. For this reason I highly suggest you read the background. It is important to remember the ​ ​ individual background for your figure (though this may be difficult for lower level politicians) as well as the political ideology of the ruling coalition and the power dynamics of Venezuela’s current government. I hope that you all will put in good effort into preparation, write position papers, actively speak and participate in moderated and unmoderated caucus, and come up with creative and informed solutions to these pressing issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Chavismo
    Explaining Chavismo: The Unexpected Alliance of Radical Leftists and the Military in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez by Javier Corrales Associate Professor of Political Science Amherst College Amherst, MA 01002 [email protected] March 2010 1 Knowing that Venezuela experienced a profound case of growth collapse in the 1980s and 1990s is perhaps enough to understand why Venezuela experienced regime change late in the 1990s. Most political scientists agree with Przeworski et al. (2000) that severe economic crises jeopardize not just the incumbents, but often the very continuity of democratic politics in non-rich countries. However, knowledge of Venezuela’s growth collapse is not sufficient to understand why political change went in the direction of chavismo. By chavismo I mean the political regime established by Hugo Chávez Frías after 1999. Scholars who study Venezuelan politics disagree about the best label to describe the Hugo Chávez administration (1999-present): personalistic, popular, populist, pro-poor, revolutionary, participatory, socialist, Castroite, fascist, competitive authoritarian, soft- authoritarian, third-world oriented, hybrid, statist, polarizing, oil-addicted, ceasaristic, counter-hegemonic, a sort of Latin American Milošević, even political ―carnivour.‖ But there is nonetheless agreement that, at the very least, chavismo consists of a political alliance of radical-leftist civilians and the military (Ellner 2001:9). Chávez has received most political advice from, and staffed his government with, individuals who have an extreme-leftist past, a military background, or both. The Chávez movement is, if nothing else, a marriage of radicals and officers. And while there is no agreement on how undemocratic the regime has become, there is virtual agreement that chavismo is far from liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Venezuela in the Gray Zone: from Feckless Pluralism to Dominant
    Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Sistema de Información Científica Myers, David J.; McCoy, Jennifer L. Venezuela in the gray zone: From feckless pluralism to dominant power system Politeia, núm. 30, enero-junio, 2003, pp. 41-74 Universidad Central de Venezuela Caracas, Venezuela Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=170033588002 Politeia, ISSN (Printed Version): 0303-9757 [email protected] Universidad Central de Venezuela Venezuela How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage www.redalyc.org Non-Profit Academic Project, developed under the Open Acces Initiative 41 REVISTA POLITEIAVENEZUELA, N° 30. INSTITUTO IN THE DE GRAY ESTUDIOS ZONE: POLÍTICOS FROM, FECKLESSUNIVERSIDAD PLURALISM CENTRAL DE TO VENEZUELA DOMINANT, 2003:41-74 POWER SYSTEM 30 Politeia Venezuela in the gray zone: From feckless pluralism to dominant power system Venezuela en la zona gris: desde el pluralismo ineficaz hacia el sistema de poder dominante David J. Myers / Jennifer L. McCoy Abstract Resumen This paper emphasizes the need to measure the El presente texto resalta la necesidad de medir las varying qualities of democracy. It delineates subtypes diversas cualidades de la democracia. En este senti- of political regimes that occupy a “gray zone” between do, delinea los diferentes tipos de regímenes políti- dictatorship and democracy, and examines the cos que se encuentran en la denominada “zona gris” possibilities for political change in the “gray zone”. entre la dictadura y la democracia. Asimismo exami- The authors address two sets of questions about na las posibilidades de cambio dentro de dicha zona political change: a) What causes a limitedly pluralist gris.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Politics and Social Polarisation in Venezuela 1998-2004
    1 Working Paper no.76 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ANTI- POLITICS AND SOCIAL POLARISATION IN VENEZUELA, 1998-2004 Jonathan DiJohn Crisis States Research Centre December 2005 Copyright © Jonathan DiJohn, 2005 Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in this Working Paper, the Crisis States Research Centre and LSE accept no responsibility for the veracity of claims or accuracy of information provided by contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. Requests for permission to reproduce this Working Paper, of any part thereof, should be sent to: The Editor, Crisis States Research Centre, DESTIN, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. Crisis States Research Centre The Political Economy of Anti-Politics and Social Polarisation in Venezuela 1998-2004 Jonathan DiJohn Crisis States Research Centre In the past twenty years, there has been a sharp decline in party politics and the rise of what can best be described as a new form of populist politics. Nowhere has this trend been more evident than in Latin America in the 1990s, particularly in the Andean region.1 One common theme in this trend is the rise of leaders who denounce politics by attacking political parties as the source of corruption, social exclusion and poor economic management of the
    [Show full text]
  • Partisanship During the Collapse Venezuela's Party System
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Political Science Publications and Other Works Political Science February 2007 Partisanship During the Collapse Venezuela's Party System Jana Morgan University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_polipubs Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Morgan, Jana, "Partisanship During the Collapse Venezuela's Party System" (2007). Political Science Publications and Other Works. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_polipubs/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Partisanship during the C ollapse of V enezuela’ S Part y S y stem * Jana Morgan University of Tennessee Received: 9-29-2004; Revise and Resubmit 12-20-2004; Revised Received 12-20-2005; Final Acceptance 4-03-2006 Abstract: Political parties are crucial for democratic politics; thus, the growing incidence of party and party system failure raises questions about the health of representative democracy the world over. This article examines the collapse of the Venezuelan party system, arguably one of the most institutionalized party systems in Latin America, by examining the individual-level basis behind the exodus of partisans from the traditional parties. Multinomial logit analysis of partisan identification in 1998, the pivotal moment of the system’s complete col- lapse, indicates that people left the old system and began to support new parties because the traditional parties failed to incorporate and give voice to important ideas and interests in society while viable alternatives emerged to fill this void in representation.
    [Show full text]
  • VENEZUELA Date of Elections: December 1, 1968 Characteristics
    VENEZUELA Date of Elections: December 1, 1968 Characteristics of Parliament The National Congress of Venezuela is composed of two Houses: — the Chamber of Deputies, currently comprising 214 members elected for 5 years. This figure varies from legislature to legislature according to fluctuations in the population and to the number of "additional seats" (currently 16) allocated on a nation-wide basis so as to ensure a more accurate representation of political forces. — the Senate, composed of 42 members — 2 for each of the 20 states plus the federal district — and a variable number of sen­ ators holding "additional seats" (10 at present). To these senators elected for 5-year terms are added a number of life senators (3 at present), participating in their capacity as former Presidents of the Republic. On December 1, the electorate went to the polls to renew both Houses and elect a new Head of State. Electoral System All Venezuelan citizens of both sexes who are at least 18 years old and not subject to civil interdiction or political disqualification are entitled to vote, with the exception of those on active military service. All citizens between the ages of 21 and 65 who fulfil these conditions are bound by law to register on the electoral rolls and participate in the poll. Except in certain specified cases, failure to comply is punishable by a fine. 91 2 Venezuela All Venezuelan-born voters are eligible for election to the Cham­ ber of Deputies provided they are at least 21 years old and to the Senate if they are over 30 years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: the Life and Times of the Party System
    VENEZUELA: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE PARTY SYSTEM Miriam Kornblith and Daniel H. Levine Working Paper #197 - June 1993 Miriam Kornblith is a researcher at the Instituto de Estudios Políticos and Professor at the Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas of the Universidad Central de Venezuela. She is a past Visiting Fellow at the Center for Latin American Studies, Stanford University (1988-1991), and is a Visiting Researcher at the Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administración (IESA) in Caracas. She is currently working on a project on constitutional reform and democratic consolidation in Latin America. Daniel H. Levine is Professor of Political Science at the University of Michigan, and is a past Fellow of the Kellogg Institute. In 1992 and 1993 he has been a Visiting Professor at IESA (Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administración) in Caracas, Venezuela. His most recent books are Popular Voices in Latin American Catholicism (Princeton University Press, 1992) and Constructing Culture and Power in Latin America (University of Michigan Press, 1993). ABSTRACT Political parties have been at the center of modern Venezuelan democracy from the beginning. Strong, highly disciplined, and nationally organized parties have dominated political organization and action in the modern period. Parties have penetrated and controlled organized social life and effectively monopolized resources and channels of political action. Beginning in the 1980s, the political parties and the party system as a whole have experienced mounting criticism and challenge. In a time of growing economic, social, and political crisis, efforts have nonetheless been made to loosen national control and open new channels for citizen participation with the aim of ‘democratizing Venezuelan democracy.’ The ability of the parties to implement these reforms, and to reform themselves in the process, is central to the survival of effective democracy in Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada on Guard: Assessing the Immigration Security Threat of Iran, Venezuela and Cuba – 2
    CANADA ON GUARD: Assessing the Immigration Security Threat of Iran, Venezuela and Cuba Victoria L. Henderson, Joseph M. Humire and Fernando D. Menéndez This policy report delves into an emerging threat to North American KEY POINTS: immigration security building on a ! Iran is collaborating with theme discussed on Parliament Hill in Venezuela and Cuba to exploit Ottawa on October 2012 and at the the seams in the Canadian immigration system. Albany Club, Toronto on November 2013 as part of the Center for a Secure ! From 2009 to 2011, Latin America was the largest prior Free Society’s (SFS) annual Future of embarkation region for North America Forum. improperly documented Iranians migrating to Canada who seek The SFS report highlights attempts to refugee status. violate Canada’s immigration system, ! Venezuelan authorities examines Venezuela’s role as a provided at least 173 passports, visas and other documentation “bridge” for Iranian covert access to to Islamist extremists seeking Canada, reviews the use of cultural to slip unnoticed into North exchange and other soft power America. strategies to win support for state ! Soft power solidarity networks sponsors of terrorism, and presents in Canada serve as a “Trojan preliminary policy recommendations for Horse” for Iran and ALBA to establish cover for spies, strengthening Canada’s immigration saboteurs and other nefarious and national security system. actors. This report, in its entirety, can be found at www.securefreesociety.org !"#$%&'()% SFS POLICY REPORT No. 1 – JUNE 2014 +,#&(+)$ +"$
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Atlas Shrugged Winning Essay
    2020 ATLAS SHRUGGED WINNING ESSAY FIRST PLACE Nathaniel Shippee, Chicago, IL — University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Atlas Shrugged tells the story of what happens to a society when its most productive members go missing. Where today can a similar situation be found? Select a well-known situation that has made international headlines. Explain what you understand to be both the cause and the effect of the situation. In what ways are the circumstances similar to the story of Atlas Shrugged? In what ways are they different? Over the course of the twentieth century, Venezuela experienced explosive economic growth compared to other South American nations. Substantial petroleum reserves discovered in 1922 attracted extensive foreign investment in the fledgling Venezuelan oil industry. By 1935, the rapid growth of that industry resulted in the highest per capita income in South America and a correspondingly high material standard of living. Up until the end of the twentieth century, large numbers of immigrants, originating both in other South American countries and in Europe, flocked to Venezuela, testifying to the country’s prosperity and material security. Today, the opposite is true. Over the past two decades, millions of Venezuelans have been plunged into poverty. The nation’s financial system has been devastated by hyperinflation, shortages of food and other basic necessities are chronic, and violent crime occurs more frequently than anywhere else in the world. As a result of these ever-worsening conditions, between four and six million people have left Venezuela in the past five years, or as much as 20% of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela » Rafael Caldera Rodríguez
    » Biografías Líderes Políticos » América del Sur » Venezuela » Rafael Caldera Rodríguez Rafael Caldera Rodríguez Venezuela Acttualliizaciión:: 24 enerro 2019 Presidente de la República (1969-1974, 1994-1999) Raffaell Anttoniio Calldera Rodrííguez Mandatto:: 2 ffebrrerro 1994 -- 2 ffebrrerro 1999 Naciimiientto:: San Felliipe,, Esttado Yarracuy,, 24 enerro 1916 Deffunciión:: Carracas,, 24 diiciiembrre 2009 Parttiido pollííttiico:: Converrgenciia Naciionall ((CN));; antterriiorrmentte,, dell Parrttiido Sociiall Crriisttiiano ((COPEII)) Proffesiión:: Perriiodiistta,, sociióllogo y prroffesorr de uniiverrsiidad Editado por: Roberto Ortiz de Zárate Presentación El modelo de alternancia bipartidista en democracia que, desde el Pacto de Punto Fijo de 1958, caracterizó las últimas cuatro décadas del siglo XX en Venezuela tuvo como artífice principal a Rafael Caldera (1916-2009), fundador del Partido Social Cristiano (COPEI), pionero de esta ideología en América Latina y dos veces presidente de la República. En su primer mandato, entre 1969 y 1974, Caldera, haciendo gala de dinamismo, redefinió en favor del Estado la política petrolera y reinsertó a las insurgencias armadas de izquierda al juego político civil. Años después, su ruptura con el COPEI y la creación de su propia formación de tendencia conservadora, Convergencia, le permitieron regresar al poder en 1994, justo para enfrentar una aguda crisis financiera, heredada del Gobierno adeco de Carlos Andrés Pérez, que intentó atajar con medidas intervencionistas, primero, y con fórmulas liberales, después. En 1999 un decrépito Caldera, autor además de una copiosa obra intelectual, dejó paso en el Palacio de Miraflores al impetuoso Hugo Chávez, el ex teniente coronel golpista al que había liberado de la prisión pese a su proyecto de liquidar el modelo político vigente, a todas luces amortizado, trayendo las banderas de la revolución bolivariana y el neosocialismo.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT State and Power After Neoliberalism in Bolivarian
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title State and Power after Neoliberalism in Bolivarian Venezuela Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/86g3m849 Author Kingsbury, Donald V. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ STATE AND POWER AFTER NEOLIBERALISM IN BOLIVARIAN VENEZUELA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICS with emphases in LATIN AMERICAN AND LATINO STUDIES and HISTORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS by Donald V. Kingsbury June 2012 The Dissertation of Donald V. Kingsbury is approved: ____________________________________ Professor Megan Thomas, Chair ____________________________________ Professor Juan Poblete ____________________________________ Professor Gopal Balakrishnan ____________________________________ Professor Michael Urban _________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Donald V. Kingsbury 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures iv Abstract v Acknowledgments vi I. Introduction 1 II. Between Multitude and Pueblo 53 III. The Problem with Populism 120 IV. The Power of the Many 169 V. The Discursive Production of a ‘Revolution’ 219 VI. ‘…after Neoliberalism?’ 277 VII. Conclusion 342 VIII. Bibliography 362 ! """! LIST OF FIGURES Figure 0.1 Seven Presidential elections and four referenda during the Bolivarian Revolution, 1998-2010. 18 Figure 1.1 "Every 11th has its 13th: The Pueblo is still on the street, but today it’s on the road to socialism!" 102 Figure 3.1 “Here comes the People’s Capitalism” 201 Figure 4.1: Advertisement of ‘Mi Negra’ Program 221 Figure 4.2 ¡Rumbo al Socialismo Bolivariano! 261 Figure 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Polity IV Country Report 2010: Venezuela
    Polity IV Country Report 2010: Venezuela Score: 2009 2010 Change Polity: -3 -3 0 Democ: 1 1 0 Autoc: 4 4 0 Durable: 1 Tentative: Yes SCODE VEN CCODE 101 Date of Report 1 June 2011 Polity IV Component Variables XRREG XRCOMP XROPEN XCONST PARREG PARCOMP 2 1 4 3 3 3 Date of Most Recent Polity Transition (3 or more point change) End Date 17 December 2006 Begin Date 16 February 2009 Polity Fragmentation: No Constitution 1999 President Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías (PSUV); initially directly elected in Executive(s) February 1999; reelected under new constitution, July 2000; most recently reelected, 3 December 2006, 62.9% Unicameral: National Assembly (165 seats, 3 reserved for indigenous peoples; Legislature directly elected; most recent elections, 26 September 2010) United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) and allies: 98 Other parties: 67 Judiciary Supreme Tribunal of Justice Narrative Description:1 Executive Recruitment: Designation (3) For over 30 years, starting in 1958, Venezuelan politics was defined by the peaceful rotation of power between the two establishment parties, the Christian Democratic Party (COPEI) and the Democratic Action party (AD). However, in late 1980s Venezuela was plagued by depressed oil revenues, a failing economy, and increasing popular dissatisfaction and political turmoil. There were two unsuccessful military coup attempts in 1992 (one led on 4 February 1992, by the current president, Hugo Chàvez) followed by the resignation in March 1993 of President Carlos Andrés Pérez after his impeachment for embezzlement (the legislature elected Senator Ramon Velásquez to serve out Pérez’s term). Rafael Caldera Rodríguez, who had led the movement to force Pérez’s resignation, formed a National Convergence coalition and won the December 1993 presidential election, becoming the first president not elected from either the COPEI or AD 1 The research described in this report was sponsored by the Political Instability Task Force (PITF).
    [Show full text]