DOCSLIB.ORG

Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro’S Cabinet Chair: Peter Derrah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro’S Cabinet Chair: Peter Derrah Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro’s Cabinet Chair: Peter Derrah 1 Table of Contents 3. Letter from Chair 4. Members of Committee 5. Committee Background A.Solving the Economic Crisis B.Solving the Presidential Crisis 2 Dear LYMUN delegates, Hi, my name is Peter Derrah and I am a senior at Lyons Township High School. I have done MUN for all my four years of high school, and I was a vice chair at the previous LYMUN conference. LYMUN is a well run conference and I hope that you all will have a good experience here. In this committee you all will be representing high level political figures in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, as you deal with an incomprehensible level of inflation and general economic collapse, as well as internal political disputes with opposition candidates, the National Assembly, and massive protests and general civil unrest. This should be a very interesting committee, as these ongoing issues are very serious, urgent, and have shaped geopolitics recently. I know a lot of these issues are extremely complex and so I suggest that you do enough research to have at least a basic understanding of them and solutions which could solve them. For this reason I highly suggest you read the background. It is important to remember the ​ ​ individual background for your figure (though this may be difficult for lower level politicians) as well as the political ideology of the ruling coalition and the power dynamics of Venezuela’s current government. I hope that you all will put in good effort into preparation, write position papers, actively speak and participate in moderated and unmoderated caucus, and come up with creative and informed solutions to these pressing issues. These are roughly the metrics the vice chairs and I will use to give out awards. Just as a reminder, this is a crisis committee not a general assembly, which I expect to make this committee more engaging and interesting. I hope you all will have a good time, develop your MUN skills, learn a lot, and I wish you all good luck. Email me at [email protected] if you need help or have any questions. These crisis are ongoing and ​ subject to change so keep a brief attention to any major news regarding the current situation in Venezuela. Peter Derrah, 3 Members in Committee: 1. Nicolas Maduro, President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela 2. Diosdado Cabello, President of the Constituent Assembly 3. Delcy Rodriguez, Vice President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela 4. Francisco Torrealba, Minority Leader of the National Assembly 5. Jorge Arreaza, Minister of Foriegn Affairs 6. Vladimir Padrino Lopez, Minister of Defence 7. Tareck El Aissami, Former Vice President, current Minister of Petroleum, and current Minister of National Production 8. Aristobulo Isturiz, Former Vice President and current Minister of Education 9. Jorge Rodriguez, Former Vice President and current Minister of Communication 10. Eneida Laya Lugo, Minister of Commerce 11. Simon Zerpa, Minister of Economics and Finance 12. Wilmar Castro Soltedo, Minister of Agriculture 13. Nestor Reverol, Minister of the Interior 14. Hipolito Abreu, Minister of Transportation 15. Carlos Gonzales, Minister of Health 16. Cilia Flores, First Lady of Venezuela and member of the Constituent Assembly 4 A Brief History of contemporary Venezuela: Pre-Bolivarian Era: Venezuela was blessed with something its South American neighbors lacked, the largest oil reserves in the world. This oil money propelled 20th century Venezuela into being the wealthiest and most prosperous nation in South America, but Venezuela still suffered from many of the same problems as its neighbors: crime, high levels of poverty, inequality, and corruption. In the late 80s and early 90s, a combination of failing oil prices, controversial IMF supported neoliberal economic reforms, and general dissatisfaction led to massive riots in the capital Caracas and a destabilized political environment, which was an opportunity for a young ambitious military officer named Hugo Chavez. After his disillusionment with the economic and political structures in Venezuela, he became inspired by historical Venezuelans such as the legendary general Simon Bolivar, and formed revolutionary cells within the military in order to revolt against the political and economic elite, and put himself and his supporters in power. In 1992, he and his sympathizers in the army launched a coup d'etat, which ultimately failed due to a lack of popular support and landed Chavez in jail. The next president Caldera later pardoned him, which was a very fateful decision. 5 Chavez Era: After continuing economic decline, an increasingly disillusioned Venezuelan populace voted in the same man who tried to overthrow the government less than a decade ago. In the 1998 Venezuelan elections, Hugo Chavez represented the socialist Fifth Republic Movement party and won with 56% of the vote, after running a populist campaign focusing on anti-poverty measures and changing the stagnant political arena. From the beginning, Chavez’s autocratic tendencies were showing as he sought to radically change Venezuela. In 1999 a new Constitution created by his party was passed in a referendum, which changed the Republic of Venezuela into the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (named after revolutionary Simon Bolivar). This created a unicameral legislature, and centralized the country among other alterations. To legitimize his new changes and to increase his political control, he called for new elections in 2000, which saw Chavez win the presidency with 59% and major victories in the National Assembly and local municipalities. His initial economic policies were not considerably radical, as he sought to improve foreign investment while funding welfare programs and increasing the state-run oil company PDVSA’s share of Venezuela’s reserves. However, his friendship with Communist Cuba and his authoritarian tendencies were off-putting to much of Venezuela's population, and his nepotistic appointments to government positions were unpopular. His radical rhetoric and centralization of power made Chavez a lot of enemies, and in 2002 a coup d'etat was attempted. Though the coup was supported by many groups including public workers, the business community, and opposition parties, ultimately it failed. The coup’s 6 unintentional consequences were drastic, as it pushed Chavez from his ideas of moderate economic reform and conciliatory stance towards business into increased radicalization, and his retaliatory firings of PDVSA employees and leadership permanently damaged the crown jewel of Venezuela. Chavez continued his agenda, using increasing oil profits to go towards social programs. Though the programs were unsustainable as they put serious financial pressure on the PDVSA, they were successful, at least in the short-term. His “Bolivarian Missions” social programs ​ ​ reduced extreme poverty in half from around 20% to 10%, and bolstered his support among working class people. In 2006 he won another presidential election with 63%. With Latin America’s leftist Pink Tide, Chavez had many friends in the regions and rising oil costs brought increased government revenue, putting him in a secure position and made him popular domestically. Despite this, Chavez suffered his first major defeat in a close 2007 referendum where 51% of voters rejected his plan to make Venezuela into a ‘socialist state’. Some issues were becoming apparent in Venezuela by the late 2000s. Crime was rising heavily and despite the successes of his social programs, his poorly managed price control policies created shortages that were becoming more and more prevalent every year. The economic issues were exacerbated by the 2008 financial crisis, with volatility in the oil markets hurting Venezuela’s subsidized imports and inflation increasing. Corruption and the incompetence of appointments ruined the potential of various state run corporations. The cult of personality that Chavez promoted worried many who saw him as increasingly autocratic. Though these issues decreased Chavez’s popularity, they were not serious enough to vote him out of office. In 2012 he was reelected by 55%, though his health issues prevented him from continuing his presidency, shortly after in 2013 he died after a heart attack. He chose his long time protege Nicolas Maduro to succeed him. 7 Maduro Era: In a 2013 Presidential Election, which was called after the death of President Chavez, the United Socialist Party of Venezuela’s candidate Nicolas Maduro won a very close election with 50.6% of the vote. Almost immediately, an economic crisis was created with the sharp drop in oil prices. Chavez’s and Maduro’s overreliance on oil profits and hostile attitude towards business made failing oil prices a catastrophic economic disaster waiting to happen. Venezuela’s social programs had no funding, neither did their state-run corporations, and the poorest people who depended on subsided goods to meet their basic needs lost it all. This was all correlated with inflation, which skyrocketed with the general economic collapse and brought down the private sector with it. Maduro’s decision to rule by decree to combat these issues made him essentially a dictator, and his forceful action did not really solve any of these issues. He applied that philosophy to dealing with massive unrest and protests, which only made him more unpopular and brought the ire of the international community over his human rights abuses, including sanctions from the US and the EU. In 2015, the PSUV lost the legislative assembly election to a united opposition, winning only 40%. Though a thorn in the side of the Maduro presidency, he basically overrode any legislative powers the National Assembly with the formation of the Constitutive Assembly, a consultative group assembled with the de jure purpose of changing or drafting a new constitution. Stacked with Maduro loyalists, they gave themselves legislative powers, essentially creating an alternative National Assembly while voiding any of the National Assembly’s powers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arbitrary Rule of Decree
    Arbitrary Rule Of Decree Funest Aldric harangued no penstemon pull-up impossibly after Jermayne pepper unamusingly, quite frostlike. Inflowing and cream Waine foreseeing her killocks cataphracts velated and machicolated hitherward. Ulick saponifies deceitfully? Seven years of arbitrary state. They impose significant obstacles to rule of arbitrary decree law? Get updates on human rights issues from around this globe. Further, vessels that merely touch briefly at numerous ports never written a taxable situs at any one than them, though are taxable in the domicile of their owners or not floor all. But prosecutions remained a union federation of their organizations reported that a lifetime terms, if an atmosphere not. Republican National Committee as a defendant and the NAACP as a plaintiff. Political activist Anurak Jeantawanich was the first ramp to be charged in violation of report decree. But advise our recent cases mean than, they leave debatable issues as respects business, economic, and social affairs to legislative decision. Wisconsin Legislature should impose within its authority pursuant to the Electors Clause. These decrees contain alaska. What would Keynes do? If arbitrary rule that decree would still in malawi could exercise arbitrary rule of decree or decree? The competent court decision should also be limited to a specific period of time in order to maintain safeguards for accused persons in the preliminary investigation phase, and to ensure consistence with relevant international conventions and standards. Rule of decree or other spouse can be rendered under this article three hours per day, contesting states is arbitrary rule of decree beyond that. African American and Hispanic voters, unduly burden the right to associate, deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race, intentionally discriminate on the basis of race, and impose viewpoint discrimination based on partisan affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Video, Mexico, and the Politics of Affect Channeling the State
    Reviewed by Robert J. Mills The Open Invitation: Activist Video, Mexico, and the Politics of Affect by Freya Schiwy. University of Pittsburgh Press. 2019. 296 pages. $40.00 hardcover; also available in e- book. Channeling the State: Community Media and Popular Politics in Venezuela by Naomi Schiller. Duke University Press. 2018. 296 pages. $99.95 hardcover; $26.95 paper; also available in e-book. In May 2006, an annual teachers’ strike in the southern Mexican city of Oaxaca became the site of an unprecedented act of state brutality. Less than one month into this planned labor action, organized initially against a series of neoliberal educational reforms, the recently elected governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz deployed an army of several thousand riot police to forcefully infiltrate a number of protest camps assembled across the town square. The scenes that followed were devastating: striking labor activists were taken as political prisoners, union coordinators were evicted and reportedly tortured, and at least seventeen individuals lost their lives at the hands of the Mexican state. Over the following days, in an unexpected gesture of support, outraged local residents helped rebuild the devastated encampments, declared themselves 202 JCMS 60.2 • WINTER 2021 the new regional governing body, and initiated a grassroots anarchist uprising that would seize control of the city for the next seven months. Images of this unrest soon began to circulate globally; almost overnight, Oaxaca emerged onto the world stage as a city in flames, recognizable amid its swaths of smoke and tear gas as a zone of active democratic contestation. From behind their reinforced barricades, the energized occupants— soon to become the Oaxaca Peoples’ Popular Assembly (APPO)— led with the prefigurative chant “Ulises ya cayó! Ya cayó! Ya cayó!” (Ulises already fell! Already fell! Already fell!).1 Just a decade earlier, in the neighboring state of Venezuela, a political project spearheaded by the newly elected Hugo Chávez was likewise recon- figuring the contours of an established participatory democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • No Room for Debate the National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela
    No Room for Debate The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela July 2019 Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952 and active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realization of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession. ® No Room for Debate - The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela © Copyright International Commission of Jurists Published in July 2019 The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) permits free reproduction of extracts from any of its publications provided that due acknowledgment is given and a copy of the publication carrying the extract is sent to its headquarters at the following address: International Commission of Jurists P.O. Box 91 Rue des Bains 33 Geneva Switzerland No Room for Debate The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela This report was written by Santiago Martínez Neira, consultant to the International Commission of Jurists. Carlos Ayala, Sam Zarifi and Ian Seiderman provided legal and policy review. This report was written in Spanish and translated to English by Leslie Carmichael. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Chavismo
    Explaining Chavismo: The Unexpected Alliance of Radical Leftists and the Military in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez by Javier Corrales Associate Professor of Political Science Amherst College Amherst, MA 01002 [email protected] March 2010 1 Knowing that Venezuela experienced a profound case of growth collapse in the 1980s and 1990s is perhaps enough to understand why Venezuela experienced regime change late in the 1990s. Most political scientists agree with Przeworski et al. (2000) that severe economic crises jeopardize not just the incumbents, but often the very continuity of democratic politics in non-rich countries. However, knowledge of Venezuela’s growth collapse is not sufficient to understand why political change went in the direction of chavismo. By chavismo I mean the political regime established by Hugo Chávez Frías after 1999. Scholars who study Venezuelan politics disagree about the best label to describe the Hugo Chávez administration (1999-present): personalistic, popular, populist, pro-poor, revolutionary, participatory, socialist, Castroite, fascist, competitive authoritarian, soft- authoritarian, third-world oriented, hybrid, statist, polarizing, oil-addicted, ceasaristic, counter-hegemonic, a sort of Latin American Milošević, even political ―carnivour.‖ But there is nonetheless agreement that, at the very least, chavismo consists of a political alliance of radical-leftist civilians and the military (Ellner 2001:9). Chávez has received most political advice from, and staffed his government with, individuals who have an extreme-leftist past, a military background, or both. The Chávez movement is, if nothing else, a marriage of radicals and officers. And while there is no agreement on how undemocratic the regime has become, there is virtual agreement that chavismo is far from liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 3 1998 Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse Estelle T. Lau State University of New York at Buffalo Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Estelle T. Lau, Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse, 3 MICH. J. RACE & L. 417 (1998). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol3/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAN MONEY WHITEN? EXPLORING RACE PRACTICE IN COLONIAL VENEZUELA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTEMPORARY RACE DISCOURSE Estelle T. Lau* The Gracias al Sacar, a fascinating and seemingly inconceivable practice in eighteenth century colonial Venezuela, allowed certain individuals of mixed Black and White ancestry to purchase "Whiteness" from their King. The author exposes the irony of this system, developed in a society obsessed with "natural" ordering that labeled individuals according to their precise racial ancestry. While recognizing that the Gracias al Sacar provided opportunities for advancement and an avenue for material and social struggle, the author argues that it also justified the persistence of racial hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Suriname Republic of Suriname
    Suriname Republic of Suriname Key Facts __________ OAS Membership Date: 1977 Head of State / Head of Government: President Desire Delano Bouterse Capital city: Paramaribo Population: 597,927 Language(s): Dutch (official), English (widely spoken), Sranang Tongo (native language), Caribbean Hindustani, Javanese Religions: Protestant 23.6%, Hindu 22.3%, Roman Catholic 21.6%, Muslim 13.8%, other Christian 3.2%, Winti 1.8%, Jehovah's Witness 1.2%, other 1.7%, none 7.5%, unspecified 3.2% Ethnic Groups: Hindustani 27.4%, "Maroon" 21.7%, Creole 15.7%, Javanese 13.7%, mixed 13.4%, other 7.6%, unspecified 0.6% Currency: Surinamese dollar (SRD) Gross domestic product (PPP): $8.688 billion (2017 est.) Legal System: civil law system influenced by the Dutch civil codes. The Commissie Nieuw Surinaamse Burgerlijk Wetboek completed drafting a new civil code in February 2009. Political system: Suriname is a presidential republic. The president and vice president are indirectly elected by the National Assembly, where they go on to serve five-year terms without any term limits. The president will serve the Chief of State and the Head of Government. The National Assembly that elects people to these offices consists of 51 members who are directly elected in multi-seat constituencies by party-list proportional representation vote. These members also serve five-year terms. The High Court of Justice of Suriname consists of four members, as well as one court president and vice president. Each of these members are to be appointed by the national president in consultation with the National Assembly, the State Advisory Council, and the Order of Private Attorneys.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers in Post-Communist Government: a Constitutional Case Study of the Russian Federation Amy J
    American University International Law Review Volume 10 | Issue 4 Article 6 1995 Separation of Powers in Post-Communist Government: A Constitutional Case Study of the Russian Federation Amy J. Weisman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Weisman, Amy J. "Separation of Powers in Post-Communist Government: A Constitutional Case Study of the Russian Federation." American University International Law Review 10, no. 4 (1995): 1365-1398. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEPARATION OF POWERS IN POST- COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT: A CONSTITUTIONAL CASE STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Amy J. Weisman* INTRODUCTION This comment explores the myriad of issues related to constructing and maintaining a stable, democratic, and constitutionally based govern- ment in the newly independent Russian Federation. Russia recently adopted a constitution that expresses a dedication to the separation of powers doctrine.' Although this constitution represents a significant step forward in the transition from command economy and one-party rule to market economy and democratic rule, serious violations of the accepted separation of powers doctrine exist. A thorough evaluation of these violations, and indeed, the entire governmental structure of the Russian Federation is necessary to assess its chances for a successful and peace- ful transition and to suggest alternative means for achieving this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Diplomacy
    Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 400 South Orange Avenue, McQuaid Hall, South Orange, NJ 07079 Tel: 973-275-2515 Fax: 973-275-2519 Email: [email protected] http://www.journalofdiplomacy.org Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations is the official semi- Editor-in-Chief annual publication of the Seton Hall School Dennis Meaney of Diplomacy and International Relations at Seton Hall University. The Journal provides Deputy Editor-in-Chief a unique forum for international leaders in Michael Curtin government, the private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations to Executive Editor analyze and comment on international Ruthly Cadestin affairs. Editorial Media Manager Indexing: The Journal is indexed by Sajedeh Goudarzi Columbia International Affairs Online, Public Affairs Information Service, Social Media Associates International Political Science Abstracts, Patricia Zanini Graca, Juan C Garcia, America: History and Life and Historical Abstracts: International Relations and Security Network, and Ulrich’s Periodical Senior Editors Directory. Zehra Khan, Kevin Hill, Chiazam T Onyenso Manuscripts: Address all submissions to the Editor-in-Chief. We accept both hard Associate Editors copies and electronic versions. Submissions Maliheh Bitaraf, Meagan Torello, Erick may not exceed 6,000 words in length and Agbleke, Oluwagbemiga D Oyeneye, Edder must follow the Chicago manual of style. A Zarate, Emanuel Hernandez, Katherine M Submission deadlines are posted on our Landes, Troy L Dorch, Kendra Brock, Alex website. Miller, Devynn N Nolan, Lynn Wassenaar, Morgan McMichen, Eleanor Baldenweck Back Issues: Available upon request. Faculty Adviser Dr. Ann Marie Murphy The opinions expressed in the Journal are those of the contributors and should not be construed as representing those of Seton Hall University, the Seton Hall School of Diplomacy and International Relations, or the editors of the Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Overview of U.S. Sanctions
    Updated April 24, 2019 Venezuela: Overview of U.S. Sanctions For more than a decade, the United States has employed Silva (former defense minister and governor of Trujillo sanctions as a policy tool in response to activities of the State), and Ramón Rodríguez Chacín (former interior Venezuelan government and Venezuelan individuals. These minister and former governor of Guárico); in 2011, Freddy have included sanctions related to terrorism, drug Alirio Bernal Rosales and Amilicar Jesus Figueroa Salazar trafficking, trafficking in persons, antidemocratic actions, (United Socialist Party of Venezuela, or PSUV, politicians), human rights violations, and corruption. Overall, the Major General Cliver Antonio Alcalá Cordones, and Treasury Department has imposed financial sanctions on Ramon Isidro Madriz Moreno (a Venezuelan intelligence 111 individuals, and the State Department has revoked the officer); in 2017, then-Vice President Tareck el Aissami; visas of hundreds of individuals. On January 28, 2019, the and in May 2018, Pedro Luis Martin (a former senior Trump Administration announced sanctions on Venezuela’s intelligence official) and two of his associates. Others state-oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., or designated include drug trafficker Walid Makled, three dual PdVSA. Several days before the imposition of the PdVSA Lebanese-Venezuelan citizens allegedly involved in a drug sanctions, the United States recognized Juan Guaidó, the money-laundering network, and several Colombian drug head of Venezuela’s National Assembly, as the country’s traffickers with activity in Venezuela. interim president and ceased to recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. Targeted Sanctions Related to Antidemocratic Actions, Human Rights Violations, and Corruption Terrorism-Related Sanctions In response to increasing repression in Venezuela, Congress Since 2006, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CRACKDOWN on DISSENT Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela
    CRACKDOWN ON DISSENT Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Crackdown on Dissent Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35492 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit: http://www.hrw.org The Foro Penal (FP) or Penal Forum is a Venezuelan NGO that has worked defending human rights since 2002, offering free assistance to victims of state repression, including those arbitrarily detained, tortured, or murdered. The Penal Forum currently has a network of 200 volunteer lawyers and more than 4,000 volunteer activists, with regional representatives throughout Venezuela and also in other countries such as Argentina, Chile, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Uruguay, and the USA. Volunteers provide assistance and free legal counsel to victims, and organize campaigns for the release of political prisoners, to stop state repression, and increase the political and social cost for the Venezuelan government to use repression as a mechanism to stay in power.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Background and U.S
    Venezuela: Background and U.S. Policy (name redacted) Specialist in Latin American Affairs June 14, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44841 Venezuela: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Venezuela is in an acute political, economic, and social crisis. Following the March 2013 death of populist President Hugo Chávez, acting President Nicolás Maduro of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles of the opposition Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) to be elected to a six-year term in April 2013. President Maduro now has less than 20% public approval, and fissures have emerged within the PSUV about the means that he has used to maintain power, including an aborted attempt to have the Supreme Court dissolve the MUD-dominated legislature. Since March 2017, large-scale protests have called for President Maduro to release political prisoners, respect the separation of powers, and establish an electoral calendar. Instead, Maduro has scheduled July 30, 2017, elections to select delegates to a constituent assembly to rewrite the constitution (the opposition is boycotting). Security forces have repressed protesters, with some 70 dead and thousands injured and jailed. Venezuela also faces crippling economic and social challenges. An economic crisis, triggered by mismanagement and low oil prices, is worsening. In 2016, the economy contracted by 18% and inflation averaged 254% according to the International Monetary Fund. Shortages of food and medicine have caused a humanitarian crisis. The Maduro government is struggling to raise the cash needed to make its debt payments and pay for imports. Some economists maintain that Venezuela is at risk of default in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Assembly Kyiv, Ukraine, April 6–9, 2008
    The Fifth Assembly Kyiv, Ukraine, April 6–9, 2008 Making Democracy Work: From Principles to Performance WORLD MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRACY FIFTH ASSEMBLY 6–9 APRIL 2008 KYIV UKRAINE The World Movement for Democracy is a global network Steering Committee Members of democrats, including activists, practitioners, scholars, policy mak- ers, and funders, who have come together to cooperate in the promotion of Mariclaire Acosta – Mexico democracy. It is dedicated to strengthening democracy where it is weak, to Mahnaz Afkhami – Iran reforming and invigorating democracy even where it is longstanding, and to bolstering pro-democracy groups in countries that have not yet entered Genaro Arriagada – Chile* into a process of democratic transition. The Washington, D.C.-based National Igor Blaževic – Bosnia Endowment for Democracy (NED) serves as the Secretariat. Francesca Bomboko – Democratic How We Help to Promote Democracy Republic of Congo The World Movement seeks to offer new ways to give practical help to Kim Campbell – Canada (Chair) democrats who are struggling to open closed societies, challenge dicta- torships, democratize semi-authoritarian systems, consolidate emerging Kavi Chongkittavorn – Thailand democracies, and strengthen established democracies. It has the poten- Alicja Derkowska – Poland tial to do so in several ways… • as an of democrats in dangerous situations who need political Ivan Doherty – Ireland ally solidarity and moral support; Han Dongfang – China (Vice Chair) • as a lobby for the cause of democracy in international bodies and
    [Show full text]